Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Testing in Children Younger Than 2 Years in a US-Based Health System

Timing of maternal isoniazid preventive therapy on tuberculosis infection among infants exposed to HIV in low-income and middle-income settings: a secondary analysis of the TB APPRISE trial

BACKGROUND

Infants born to women with HIV in settings with a high tuberculosis burden are at risk of tuberculosis infection and rapid progression to active disease. Maternal isoniazid preventive therapy might mitigate this risk, but optimal timing of therapy remains unclear. The TB APPRISE trial showed that initiation of isoniazid during pregnancy resulted in more frequent adverse pregnancy outcomes than when initiated postpartum. We aimed to determine the proportion of infants testing positive for tuberculosis infection born to mothers who initiated isoniazid therapy antepartum compared with postpartum using two commonly used tests, the test agreement, and predictors of test positivity.

METHODS

TB APPRISE was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial done at 13 study sites across eight countries (Botswana, Haiti, India, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda, and Zimbabwe). Pregnant women with HIV on antiretroviral therapy were randomly assigned to receive immediate isoniazid preventive therapy (28 weeks isoniazid [300 mg daily], then placebo until week 40 after delivery) or deferred treatment (placebo until week 12 after delivery, then isoniazid [300 mg daily] for 28 weeks). Mother-infant pairs were followed up until 48 weeks after delivery. We included all liveborn infants with a tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) at 44 weeks. The outcomes assessed in this secondary analysis were tuberculosis test positivity by study group, test agreement, and predictors of test positivity. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01494038.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 19, 2014, and April 4, 2016, 956 mothers were randomly assigned, and 749 mother-child pairs were included in this secondary analysis. Of 749 infants, 694 (93%) received Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination, 675 (90%) were born to mothers who had completed isoniazid treatment, 20 (3%) were exposed to tuberculosis, seven (1%) became HIV positive, and one (<1%) developed probable tuberculosis. 43 (6%; 95% CI 4-8]) of 732 infants had a positive IGRA test result and 55 (8%; 6-10) of 727 infants had a positive tuberculin skin test result. Test positivity did not differ by study group (p=0·88 for IGRA; p=0·44 for tuberculin skin test). Test agreement was poor (κ=0·107 [95% CI 0·002-0·212]). Infant tuberculin skin test positivity was associated with breastfeeding (adjusted odds ratio 6·63 [95% CI 1·57-27·9]), BCG vaccination (4·97 [1·50-16·43]), and maternal tuberculin skin test positivity at delivery (3·28 [1·70-6·33]); IGRA positivity was associated with female sex (2·09 [1·06-4·14]).

INTERPRETATION

Deferral of maternal isoniazid preventive therapy to early postpartum had no effect on infant tuberculosis acquisition in our trial population, regardless of the diagnostic test used; however, tuberculosis test agreement is poor during infancy.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health.

Contact Investigations With a Single Tuberculin Skin Test on Infants Exposed to Tuberculosis in a Postpartum Care Center During the Neonatal Period

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) exposure in congregate settings related to neonates is a serious medical and social issue. TB exposure happens during the neonatal period, but contact investigations for exposed infants are usually conducted after the neonatal period. Generally, recommendations for screening and managing close contact are different for neonates and children. Thus, there are challenges in contact investigations. We aimed to report contact investigations with a single tuberculin skin test (TST) on infants exposed to infectious TB in a postpartum care center.

METHODS

The index case was a healthcare worker with active pulmonary TB: sputum acid-fast bacilli smear negative, culture positive, and no cavitary lesion. All exposed infants underwent medical examinations and chest X-ray. After TB disease was ruled out, contacts received window period prophylaxis with isoniazid (INH) until three months after the last exposure. TST was performed only once after completing the prophylaxis.

RESULTS

A total of 288 infants were selected as high-priority contacts. At the initial contact investigation, the age of infants ranged from 8 to 114 days. None of these exposed infants had TB disease. The prevalence of latent TB infection (LTBI) was 25.3% (73/288; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.7-30.7). There were no serious adverse events related to the window period prophylaxis or LTBI treatment with INH. During the 1-year follow-up period, no infants progressed to overt TB disease. The size of TST induration in infants vaccinated with percutaneous Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine was significantly larger than that of infants vaccinated with intradermal BCG vaccine (median, 8 mm vs. 5 mm; P = 0.002). In multiple logistic regression analysis, independent factors associated with TST positivity (≥ 10 mm induration) were male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.98; 95% CI, 1.6-5.64), percutaneous BCG vaccination (aOR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.75-6.48), TST reading between 60 and 72 hours after injecting purified protein derivative (aOR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.53-5.49), and INH prophylaxis more than four weeks (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94).

CONCLUSION

A single TST at three months after the last TB exposure with INH prophylaxis could be used as a main protocol in contact investigations for infants exposed to infectious TB during the neonatal period in congregate settings in Korea.

Use of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in Children <2 Years Old

While interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are widely used for detecting tuberculosis (TB) infection, tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) remain preferred for children under the age of 2 years. The preference for TST stems from concern over IGRA sensitivity in young children. However, TSTs are susceptible to false-positive results following Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination, which is common in infancy, and exposure to nontuberculous mycobacteria. We reviewed available data for IGRA performance in children under age 2 years. Across four cohorts of high-risk children under age 2 (mostly case contacts or those born in tuberculosis endemic regions), 0 of 575 untreated children with negative IGRA test results progressed to tuberculosis disease-including 0 of 70 who were TST positive but IGRA negative. While neither TSTs nor IGRAs are perfectly sensitive for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection, IGRAs are an acceptable alternative to TST in children <2 years of age.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Performance in Children: A Narrative Review

This review summarizes studies evaluating the performance of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ) infection in children. Literature searching was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase (January 2017 to December 2021) and the terms "children" or "pediatric" and "IGRAs" or "QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus." Selected studies (N = 14; 4646 subjects) enrolled children with Mtb infection, tuberculosis (TB) disease or healthy children with household TB contacts. Agreement between QFT-Plus and tuberculin skin test (TST) (kappa values) ranged from -0.201 (no agreement) to 0.83 (almost perfect agreement). Assay sensitivity of QFT-Plus (against reference standard of microbiologically confirmed TB disease) was 54.5%-87.3%, with no reported difference in children less than 5 versus greater than or equal to 5 years of age. In individuals less than or equal to 18 years of age, the rate of indeterminate results was 0%-33.3% (2.6% in children <2 years). IGRAs may overcome the limitations of TST in young, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-vaccinated children.

Interferon Gamma Release Assay Results and Testing Trends Among Patients Younger Than 2 Years Old at Two US Health Centers

BACKGROUND

Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) are approved for children ≥2 years old to aid in diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection and disease. Tuberculin skin tests (TSTs) continue to be the recommended method for diagnosis of TB infection in children <2 years, in part due to limited data and concern for high rates of uninterpretable results.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of IGRA use in patients <2 years old in 2 large Boston healthcare systems. The primary outcome was the proportion of valid versus invalid/indeterminate IGRA results. Secondary outcomes included concordance of IGRAs with paired TSTs and trends in IGRA usage over time.

RESULTS

A total of 321 IGRA results were analyzed; 308 tests (96%) were valid and 13 (4%) were invalid/indeterminate. Thirty-seven IGRAs were obtained in immunocompromised patients; the proportion of invalid/indeterminate results was significantly higher among immunocompromised (27%) compared with immunocompetent (1%) patients ( P < 0.001). Paired IGRAs and TSTs had a concordance rate of 64%, with most discordant results in bacille Calmette-Guérin-vaccinated patients. The proportion of total TB tests that were IGRAs increased over the study period (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.85, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The high proportion of valid IGRA test results in patients <2 years of age in a low TB prevalence setting in combination with the known logistical and interpretation challenges associated with TSTs support the adoption of IGRAs for this age group in certain clinical scenarios. Interpretation of IGRAs, particularly in immunocompromised patients, should involve consideration of the broader clinical context.

Performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus assays in paediatric tuberculosis: a multicentre PTBNET study

RATIONALE

In 2016, a new interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) was introduced, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), claimed to have improved sensitivity in active tuberculosis (TB).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the performance of QFT-Plus, compared with previous generation IGRAs and the tuberculin skin test (TST), in children with TB in Europe.

METHODS

Multicentre, ambispective cohort study within the Paediatric Tuberculosis Network European Trials Group (ptbnet), a dedicated paediatric TB research network comprising >300 members, capturing TB cases <18 years-of-age diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2019.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

1001 TB cases from 16 countries were included (mean age (IQR) 5.6 (2.4-12.1) years). QFT-Plus was performed in 358, QFT Gold in-Tube (QFT-GIT) in 600, T-SPOT.TB in 58 and TST in 636 cases. The overall test sensitivities were: QFT-Plus 83.8% (95% CI 80.2% to 87.8%), QFT-GIT 85.5% (95% CI 82.7% to 88.3%), T-SPOT.TB 77.6% (95% CI 66.9% to 88.3%) and TST (cut-off ≥10 mm) 83.3% (95% CI 83.3% to 86.2%). There was a trend for tests to have lower sensitivity in patients with miliary and/or central nervous system (CNS) TB (73.1%, 70.9%, 63.6% and 43.5%, respectively), and in immunocompromised patients (75.0%, 59.6%, 45.5% and 59.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the latest generation IGRA assay, QFT-Plus, does not perform better than previous generation IGRAs or the TST in children with TB disease. Overall, tests performed worse in CNS and miliary TB, and in immunocompromised children. None of the tests evaluated had sufficiently high sensitivity to be used as a rule-out test in children with suspected TB.

Challenges and the Way forward in Diagnosis and Treatment of Tuberculosis Infection

Globally, it is estimated that one-quarter of the world's population is latently infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), also known as latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Recently, this condition has been referred to as tuberculosis infection (TBI), considering the dynamic spectrum of the infection, as 5-10% of the latently infected population will develop active TB (ATB). The chances of TBI development increase due to close contact with index TB patients. The emergence of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and the risk of development of latent MDR-TB has further complicated the situation. Detection of TBI is challenging as the infected individual does not present symptoms. Currently, there is no gold standard for TBI diagnosis, and the only screening tests are tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs). However, these tests have several limitations, including the inability to differentiate between ATB and TBI, false-positive results in BCG-vaccinated individuals (only for TST), false-negative results in children, elderly, and immunocompromised patients, and the inability to predict the progression to ATB, among others. Thus, new host markers and Mtb-specific antigens are being tested to develop new diagnostic methods. Besides screening, TBI therapy is a key intervention for TB control. However, the long-course treatment and associated side effects result in non-adherence to the treatment. Additionally, the latent MDR strains are not susceptible to the current TBI treatments, which add an additional challenge. This review discusses the current situation of TBI, as well as the challenges and efforts involved in its control.

Low secondary attack rate after prolonged exposure to sputum smear positive miliary tuberculosis in a neonatal unit

BACKGROUND

Several neonatal intensive care units (NICU) have reported exposure to sputum smear positive tuberculosis (TB). NICE guidelines give support regarding investigation and treatment intervention, but not for contact definitions. Data regarding the reliability of any interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) in infants as a screening test for TB infection is scarce. We report an investigation and management strategy and evaluated the viability of IGRA (T-Spot) in infants and its concordance to the tuberculin skin test (TST).

METHODS

We performed an outbreak investigation of incident TB infection in a NICU after prolonged exposure to sputum smear positive miliary TB by an infant's mother. We defined individual contact definitions and interventions and assessed secondary attack rates. In addition, we evaluated the technical performance of T-Spot in infants and compared the results with the TST at baseline investigation.

RESULTS

Overall, 72 of 90 (80%) exposed infants were investigated at baseline, in 51 (56.7%) of 54 (60%) infants, follow-up TST at the age of 6 months was performed. No infant in our cohort showed a positive TST or T-Spot at baseline. All blood samples from infants except one responded to phytohemagglutinin (PHA), which was used as a positive control of the T-Spot, demonstrating that cells are viable and react upon stimulation. 149 of 160 (93.1%) exposed health care workers (HCW) were investigated. 1 HCW was tested positive, having no other reason than this exposure for latent TB infection. 5 of 92 (5.5%) exposed primary contacts were tested positive, all coming from countries with high TB incidences. In total, 1 of 342 exposed contacts was newly diagnosed with latent TB infection. The secondary attack rate in this study including pediatric and adult contacts was 0.29%.

CONCLUSION

This investigation highlighted the low transmission rate of sputum smear positive miliary TB in a particularly highly susceptible population as infants. Our expert definitions and interventions proved to be helpful in terms of the feasibility of a thorough outbreak investigation. Furthermore, we demonstrated concordance of T-Spot and TST. Based on our findings, we assume that T-Spot could be considered a reliable investigation tool to rule out TB infection in infants.

2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Recommendations for Nonpharmacologic Therapies, Medication Monitoring, Immunizations, and Imaging

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with a focus on nonpharmacologic therapies, medication monitoring, immunizations, and imaging, irrespective of JIA phenotype.

METHODS

We developed clinically relevant Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low). A Voting Panel including clinicians and patients/caregivers achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations.

RESULTS

Recommendations in this guideline include the use of physical therapy and occupational therapy interventions; a healthy, well-balanced, age-appropriate diet; specific laboratory monitoring for medications; widespread use of immunizations; and shared decision-making with patients/caregivers. Disease management for all patients with JIA is addressed with respect to nonpharmacologic therapies, medication monitoring, immunizations, and imaging. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low in quality. For that reason, more than half of the recommendations are conditional.

CONCLUSION

This clinical practice guideline complements the 2019 American College of Rheumatology JIA and uveitis guidelines, which addressed polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and uveitis, and a concurrent 2021 guideline on oligoarthritis, temporomandibular arthritis, and systemic JIA. It serves as a tool to support clinicians, patients, and caregivers in decision-making. The recommendations take into consideration the severity of both articular and nonarticular manifestations as well as patient quality of life. Although evidence is generally low quality and many recommendations are conditional, the inclusion of caregivers and patients in the decision-making process strengthens the relevance and applicability of the guideline. It is important to remember that these are recommendations. Clinical decisions, as always, should be made by the treating clinician and patient/caregiver.

2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Recommendations for Nonpharmacologic Therapies, Medication Monitoring, Immunizations, and Imaging

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with a focus on nonpharmacologic therapies, medication monitoring, immunizations, and imaging, irrespective of JIA phenotype.

METHODS

We developed clinically relevant Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low). A Voting Panel including clinicians and patients/caregivers achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations.

RESULTS

Recommendations in this guideline include the use of physical therapy and occupational therapy interventions; a healthy, well-balanced, age-appropriate diet; specific laboratory monitoring for medications; widespread use of immunizations; and shared decision-making with patients/caregivers. Disease management for all patients with JIA is addressed with respect to nonpharmacologic therapies, medication monitoring, immunizations, and imaging. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low in quality. For that reason, more than half of the recommendations are conditional.

CONCLUSION

This clinical practice guideline complements the 2019 American College of Rheumatology JIA and uveitis guidelines, which addressed polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, enthesitis, and uveitis, and a concurrent 2021 guideline on oligoarthritis, temporomandibular arthritis, and systemic JIA. It serves as a tool to support clinicians, patients, and caregivers in decision-making. The recommendations take into consideration the severity of both articular and nonarticular manifestations as well as patient quality of life. Although evidence is generally low quality and many recommendations are conditional, the inclusion of caregivers and patients in the decision-making process strengthens the relevance and applicability of the guideline. It is important to remember that these are recommendations. Clinical decisions, as always, should be made by the treating clinician and patient/caregiver.

Recent Innovations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Tuberculosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Tuberculosis is leading cause of global morbidity and mortality and a significant proportion of the burden of disease occurs in children. In the past 5 years, a number of innovations have improved the diagnosis and treatment for children with both latent tuberculosis infection and active disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review discusses three key areas of innovation. First, we assess utilization and performance of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in different clinical and epidemiologic scenarios. Recent literature has demonstrated good performance of IGRAs for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection, particularly in low-incidence settings such as TB control programs in North America. For high-incidence populations, or when testing is done for possible active TB disease, IGRA performance has some important limitations, but IGRA sensitivity when measured against culture proven disease may be better than earlier studies suggested. The second area of innovation is in increased uptake of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) tests and broader application in non-sputum samples for both pediatric pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Finally, recent studies have provided solid evidence in support of shorter treatment courses for pediatric latent tuberculosis infection, such as 12 weeks of weekly isoniazid and rifapentine or 4 months daily rifampin, that improve compliance and may reduce resources required for TB control. Many recent innovations in pediatric tuberculosis relate to an improved understanding of how to optimally use existing tests and treatments. Until diagnostic tests and interventions such as vaccination are developed that can dramatically alter the paradigm of pediatric TB management and control, it is important for stakeholders to have a nuanced understanding of tools currently available.