1
|
Therrell BL, Padilla CD, Borrajo GJC, Khneisser I, Schielen PCJI, Knight-Madden J, Malherbe HL, Kase M. Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023). Int J Neonatal Screen 2024; 10:38. [PMID: 38920845 PMCID: PMC11203842 DOI: 10.3390/ijns10020038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) began in the early 1960s based on the work of Dr. Robert "Bob" Guthrie in Buffalo, NY, USA. His development of a screening test for phenylketonuria on blood absorbed onto a special filter paper and transported to a remote testing laboratory began it all. Expansion of NBS to large numbers of asymptomatic congenital conditions flourishes in many settings while it has not yet been realized in others. The need for NBS as an efficient and effective public health prevention strategy that contributes to lowered morbidity and mortality wherever it is sustained is well known in the medical field but not necessarily by political policy makers. Acknowledging the value of national NBS reports published in 2007, the authors collaborated to create a worldwide NBS update in 2015. In a continuing attempt to review the progress of NBS globally, and to move towards a more harmonized and equitable screening system, we have updated our 2015 report with information available at the beginning of 2024. Reports on sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean, missing in 2015, have been included. Tables popular in the previous report have been updated with an eye towards harmonized comparisons. To emphasize areas needing attention globally, we have used regional tables containing similar listings of conditions screened, numbers of screening laboratories, and time at which specimen collection is recommended. Discussions are limited to bloodspot screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford L. Therrell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
- National Newborn Screening and Global Resource Center, Austin, TX 78759, USA
| | - Carmencita D. Padilla
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines;
| | - Gustavo J. C. Borrajo
- Detección de Errores Congénitos—Fundación Bioquímica Argentina, La Plata 1908, Argentina;
| | - Issam Khneisser
- Jacques LOISELET Genetic and Genomic Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon;
| | - Peter C. J. I. Schielen
- Office of the International Society for Neonatal Screening, Reigerskamp 273, 3607 HP Maarssen, The Netherlands;
| | - Jennifer Knight-Madden
- Caribbean Institute for Health Research—Sickle Cell Unit, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica;
| | - Helen L. Malherbe
- Centre for Human Metabolomics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa;
- Rare Diseases South Africa NPC, The Station Office, Bryanston, Sandton 2021, South Africa
| | - Marika Kase
- Strategic Initiatives Reproductive Health, Revvity, PL10, 10101 Turku, Finland;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gawde N, Kamble S, Kurle S, Jagtap D, Goel N, Nikhare K, Kamble S, Gade S, Verma V, Singh R, Nerurkar S, Rajan S, Das C. Determinants of Turn-Around-Time for Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV Testing: Retrospective Analysis of National Level PCR Testing Data. INQUIRY : A JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION AND FINANCING 2023; 60:469580231159493. [PMID: 36932853 PMCID: PMC10026091 DOI: 10.1177/00469580231159493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
India has been implementing one of the biggest Early Infant Diagnosis (EID) of HIV intervention globally. The turn-around-time (TAT) for EID test is one of the major factors for success of the program. This study was to assess the turnaround time and its determinants. It is a mixed methods study with quantitative analysis of retrospective data (2013-2016) collected from all the 7 Early Infant Diagnosis testing laboratories (called as regional reference laboratories or RRLs) in India and qualitative component that can help explain the determinants of turn-around-time. The retrospective national level data available from the RRLs was analyzed to measure the turn-around-time from the receipt of samples to the dispatch of results and to understand the determinants for the same. The 3 components transport time, testing time, and dispatch time were also calculated. Transport time was analyzed state-wise and the testing time RRL wise to understand disparities, if any. Qualitative interviews with the RRL officials were conducted to understand the underlying determinants of TAT. The Median turn-around-time ranged between 29 and 53 days over the 4 years. Transport time was significantly higher for states without RRL (42 days) than those with RRL (27 days). Testing time varied from RRL to RRL and was associated with incomplete forms, inadequate samples, kits logistics, staff turnover, staff training, and instrument related issues. The TAT is high and can be potentially reduced with interventions, such as decentralization of RRLs; courier systems for sample transport; and ensuring adequate resources at the RRL level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilesh Gawde
- Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suchit Kamble
- ICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Swarali Kurle
- ICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Dhanashree Jagtap
- ICMR - National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Noopur Goel
- ICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kalyani Nikhare
- ICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Susmita Kamble
- ICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sharda Gade
- ICMR - National AIDS Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vinita Verma
- National AIDS Control Organisation, New Delhi, India
| | - Ravikar Singh
- Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sayali Nerurkar
- Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shobini Rajan
- National AIDS Control Organisation, New Delhi, India
| | - Chinmoyee Das
- National AIDS Control Organisation, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sacks E, Katirayi L, Kaeberle B, Mafaune HW, Chadambuka A, Tachiwenyika E, Nyamundaya T, Cohn J, Mahomva A, Mushavi A. ‘The baby will have the right beginning’: a qualitative study on mother and health worker views on point-of-care HIV birth testing across 10 sites in Zimbabwe. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:546. [PMID: 36104687 PMCID: PMC9472398 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03601-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The survival of HIV-infected infants depends on early identification and initiation on effective treatment. HIV-exposed infants are tested at 6 weeks of age; however, testing for HIV sooner (e.g., shortly after birth) can identify in utero infection, which is associated with rapid progression. Infant early diagnostic virologic tests often have long turnaround times, reducing the utility of early testing. Point-of-care (POC) testing allows neonates born in health facilities to get results prior to discharge. This study aimed to understand the views of mothers and health workers regarding the use and acceptability of POC birth testing. Methods Beginning in 2018, Zimbabwe offered standard HIV testing at birth to high-risk HIV-exposed infants; as part of a pilot program, at 10 selected hospitals, POC birth testing (BT) was offered to every HIV-exposed infant. In order to understand experiences at the selected sites, 48 interviews were held: 23 with mothers and 25 with health workers, including 6 nurses-in-charge. Participants were purposively sampled across the participating sites. Interviews were held in English, Shona, or Ndebele, and transcribed in English. Line-by-line coding was carried out, and the constant comparison method of analysis was used to identify key themes for each respondent type. Results Findings were organized under four themes: challenges with BT, acceptability of BT, benefits of BT, and recommendations for BT programs. Overall, BT was well accepted by mothers and health workers because it encouraged mothers to better care for their uninfected newborns or initiate treatment more rapidly for infected infants. While the benefits were well understood, mothers felt there were some challenges, namely that they should be informed in advance about testing procedures and tested in a more private setting. Mothers and HCWs also recommended improving awareness of BT, both among health care workers and in the community in general, as well as ensuring that facilities are well-stocked with supplies and can deliver results in a timely way before scaling up programs. Conclusions Mothers and health workers strongly support implementation and expansion of birth testing programs due to the benefits for newborns. The challenges noted should be taken as planning guidance, rather than reasons to delay or discontinue birth testing programs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03601-x.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wexler C, Kamau Y, Muchoki E, Babu S, Maosa N, Maloba M, Brown M, Goggin K, Mabachi N, Gautney B, Finocchario-Kessler S. Implementing at-birth, point-of-care HIV testing in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:89. [PMID: 34380567 PMCID: PMC8359118 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00188-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At-birth and point-of-care (POC) testing can expedite early infant diagnosis of HIV and improve infant outcomes. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study describes the implementation of an at-birth POC testing pilot from the perspective of implementing providers and identifies the factors that might support and hinder the scale up of these promising interventions. METHODS We conducted 28 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 48 providers across 4 study sites throughout the course of a pilot study assessing the feasibility and impact of at-birth POC testing. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for a priori themes related to CFIR constructs. This qualitative study was nested within a larger study to pilot and evaluate at-birth and POC HIV testing. RESULTS Out of the 39 CFIR constructs, 30 were addressed in the FGDs. While all five domains were represented, major themes revolved around constructs related to intervention characteristics, inner setting, and outer setting. Regarding intervention characteristics, the advantages of at-birth POC (rapid turnaround time resulting in improved patient management and enhanced patient motivation) were significant enough to encourage provider uptake and enthusiasm. Challenges at the intervention level (machine breakdown, processing errors), inner settings (workload, limited leadership engagement, challenges with access to information), and outer setting (patient-level challenges, limited engagement with outer setting stakeholders) hindered implementation, frustrated providers, and resulted in missed opportunities for testing. Providers discussed how throughout the course of the study adaptations to implementation (improved channels of communication, modified implementation logistics) were made to overcome some of these challenges. To improve implementation, providers cited the need for enhanced training and for greater involvement among stakeholders outside of the implementing team (i.e., other clinicians, hospital administrators and implementing partners, county and national health officials). Despite provider enthusiasm for the intervention, providers felt that the lack of engagement from leadership within the hospital and in the outer setting would preclude sustained implementation outside of a research setting. CONCLUSION Despite demonstrated feasibility and enthusiasm among implementing providers, the lack of outer setting support makes sustained implementation of at-birth POC testing unlikely at this time. The findings highlight the multi-dimensional aspect of implementation and the need to consider facilitators and barriers within each of the five CFIR domains. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03435887 . Retrospectively registered on 19 February 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Wexler
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
| | - Yvonne Kamau
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | | | - May Maloba
- Global Health Innovations - Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Melinda Brown
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Kathy Goggin
- Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Natabhona Mabachi
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Brad Gautney
- Global Health Innovations - USA, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Finocchario-Kessler S, Wexler C, Brown M, Goggin K, Lwembe R, Nazir N, Gautney B, Khamadi S, Babu S, Muchoki E, Maosa N, Mabachi N, Kamau Y, Maloba M. Piloting the Feasibility and Preliminary Impact of Adding Birth HIV Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing to the Early Infant Diagnosis Guidelines in Kenya. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021; 40:741-745. [PMID: 33990521 PMCID: PMC8274583 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Kenya, standard early infant diagnosis (EID) with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing at 6-week postnatal achieves early treatment initiation (<12 weeks) in <20% of HIV+ infants. Kenya's new early infant diagnosis guidelines tentatively proposed adding PCR testing at birth, pending results from pilot studies. METHODS We piloted birth testing at 4 Kenyan hospitals between November 2017 and November 2018. Eligible HIV-exposed infants were offered both point-of-care and PCR HIV testing at birth (window 0 to <4 weeks) and 6 weeks (window 4-12 weeks). We report the: proportion of infants tested at birth, 6-week, and both birth and 6-week testing; median infant age at results; seropositivity and antiretroviral therapy initiation. RESULTS Final sample included 624 mother-infant pairs. Mean maternal age was 30.4 years, 73.2% enrolled during antenatal care and 89.9% had hospital deliveries. Among the 590 mother-infants pairs enrolled before 4 weeks postnatal, 452 (76.6%) completed birth testing before 4 weeks, with 360 (79.6%) testing within 2 weeks, and 178 (39.4%) before hospital discharge (0-2 days). Mothers were notified of birth PCR results at a median infant age of 5.4 weeks. Among all 624 enrolled infants, 575 (92.1%) were tested during the 6-week window; 417 (66.8%) received testing at both birth and 6-weeks; and 207 received incomplete testing (93.3% only 1 PCR and 6.7% no PCR). Four infants were diagnosed with HIV, and 3 infants were initiated on antiretroviral therapy early, before 12 weeks of age. CONCLUSIONS Uptake of PCR testing at birth was high and a majority of infants received repeat testing at 6 weeks of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Catherine Wexler
- From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Melinda Brown
- From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Kathy Goggin
- Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Health Services and Outcomes Research, Kansas City, Missouri
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Raphael Lwembe
- Center for Virus Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Niaman Nazir
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | | - Samoel Khamadi
- Center for Virus Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | | | | | - Natabhona Mabachi
- From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Yvonne Kamau
- From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - May Maloba
- Global Health Innovations—Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wexler C, Nazir N, Maloba M, Brown M, Goggin K, Gautney B, Maosa N, Babu S, Muchoki E, Mabachi N, Lwembe R, Finocchario-Kessler S. Programmatic evaluation of feasibility and efficiency of at birth and 6-week, point of care HIV testing in Kenyan infant. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240621. [PMID: 33035274 PMCID: PMC7546458 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Testing infants at birth and with more efficient point of care (POC) HIV diagnostic can streamline EID and expedite infant ART initiation. We evaluated the implementation of at birth and 6-week POC testing to assess the effectiveness and feasibility when implemented by existing hospital staff in Kenya. Methods Four government hospitals were randomly assigned to receive a GeneXpert HIV-1 Qual (n = 2) or Alere m-PIMA (n = 2) machine for POC testing. All HIV-exposed infants enrolled were eligible to receive POC testing at birth and 6-weeks of age. The primary outcome was repeat POC testing, defined as testing both at birth and 6-weeks of age. Secondary outcomes included predictors of repeat POC testing, POC efficiency (turnaround times of key services), and operations (failed POC results, missed opportunities). Results Of 626 enrolled infants, 309 (49.4%) received repeat POC testing, 115 (18.4%) were lost to follow up after an at-birth test, 120 (19.2%) received POC testing at 6-weeks only, 80 (12.8%) received no POC testing, and 2 (0.3%) received delayed POC testing (>12 weeks of age). Three (0.4%) were identified as HIV-positive. Of the total 853 POC tests run at birth (n = 424) or 6-weeks (n = 429), 806 (94.5%) had a valid result documented and 792 (98.3%) results had documented maternal notification. Mean time from sample collection to notification was 1.08 days, with 751 (94.8%) notifications on the same day as sample collection. Machine error rates at birth and 6-weeks were 8.5% and 2.5%, respectively. A total of 198 infants presented for care (48 at birth; 150 at 6-weeks) without receiving a POC test, representing missed opportunities for testing. Discussion At birth POC testing can streamline infant HIV diagnosis, expedite ART initiation and can be implemented by existing hospital staff. However, maternal disengagement and missed opportunities for testing must be addressed to realize the full benefits of at birth POC testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Wexler
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Niaman Nazir
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America
| | - May Maloba
- Global Health Innovations–Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Melinda Brown
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America
| | - Kathy Goggin
- Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Health Services and Outcomes Research, Kansas City, MO, United States of America
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States of America
| | - Brad Gautney
- Global Health Innovations, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | | | | | | | - Natabhona Mabachi
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America
| | | | - Sarah Finocchario-Kessler
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|