A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Lower Eyelid Retraction Repair With Autologous Auricular Cartilage, Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix (Surgimend), and Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix (Enduragen) Spacer Grafts

Lower eyelid retraction repair using autologous auricular scapha cartilage

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of lower eyelid retraction surgery utilizing autologous auricular scapha cartilage (located within the anterior surface groove between the helix and anti-helix) and to present the surgical outcomes in a patient cohort.

METHODS

Medical records of 21 patients who underwent lower eyelid retraction surgery with scapha cartilage were retrospectively reviewed. Retractions, present for an extended duration (6 months to 20 years), exhibited 1 mm or more inferior scleral show, attributed to prior lower eyelid blepharoplasty, facial palsy, or as a normal anatomical variation. Surgical interventions included lateral canthotomy, cantholysis, incision of the subtarsal conjunctiva-lower eyelid retractors, lower eyelid retractor lysis, cartilage graft suturing to the defect area without conjunctival cover, and tightening of the lateral canthal corner in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 29 eyelids in 21 patients underwent surgery without intraoperative complications. Over a mean follow-up period of 11 months (range: 6-30 months), lower lid retraction improved in 96.5% of eyelids. Postoperative margin-to-reflex distance measurements (MRD2) significantly decreased compared to preoperative values (p = 0.001; p < 0.01). Average improvements in MRD2-a (midpupil to lower lid) and MRD2-b (lateral limbus to lower lid) were 1.77 ± 0.80 and 2.04 ± 0.81, respectively (p = 0.001; p < 0.01). Four eyelids (4/29) required revision due to canthal corner loosening, with correction necessitating periosteal flaps. All four patients had previously undergone two or more repairs elsewhere. The graft was visible in two lids but did not require further revision. One patient experienced mild helix deformity at the donor site, which did not warrant additional intervention.

CONCLUSION

In cases of lower lid retraction associated with middle/posterior lamellar shortening, utilizing an autologous auricular scapha cartilage spacer graft offers notable benefits. These advantages comprise straightforward harvesting with minimal donor site complications, stability without experiencing shrinkage, a softer texture in comparison to posterior cartilage, a concave shape that facilitates proper fitting on the globe, and its autologous nature.

Advances, challenges, and future directions in the clinical translation of ECM biomaterials for regenerative medicine applications

Extracellular Matrix (ECM) scaffolds and biomaterials have been widely used for decades across a variety of diverse clinical applications and have been implanted in millions of patients worldwide. ECM-based biomaterials have been especially successful in soft tissue repair applications but their utility in other clinical applications such as for regeneration of bone or neural tissue is less well understood. The beneficial healing outcome with the use of ECM biomaterials is the result of their biocompatibility, their biophysical properties and their ability to modify cell behavior after injury. As a consequence of successful clinical outcomes, there has been motivation for the development of next-generation formulations of ECM materials ranging from hydrogels, bioinks, powders, to whole organ or tissue scaffolds. The continued development of novel ECM formulations as well as active research interest in these materials ensures a wealth of possibilities for future clinical translation and innovation in regenerative medicine. The clinical translation of next generation formulations ECM scaffolds faces predictable challenges such as manufacturing, manageable regulatory pathways, surgical implantation, and the cost required to address these challenges. The current status of ECM-based biomaterials, including clinical translation, novel formulations and therapies currently under development, and the challenges that limit clinical translation of ECM biomaterials are reviewed herein.

Cheeklift With and Without Posterior Lamellar Spacer Grafts for Treatment of Lower Eyelid Retraction

BACKGROUND

To compare outcomes of lower eyelid retraction repair using a subperiosteal midface lifting technique with and without posterior lamellar grafts.

METHODS

Charts of patients undergoing a sub-periosteal midface lift for treatment of lower eyelid retraction using 4 techniques for posterior lamellar reconstruction were reviewed. Thirty patients were included in each of the groups: midface with hard palate graft (HPG), midface lift with acellular cadaveric graft (ADG), midface lift with retractor disinsertion (RD) and midface lift alone (NG). Measurements of distance from pupil center to lower lid margin (MRD2) and from lateral limbus to lower lid margin (MRD2limbus) were taken from pre- and postoperative photographs and compared. Secondary outcomes included rates of reoperation, major and minor complications, resolution of symptoms and keratopathy.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty operations were assessed (n = 30 for each surgical group). The average follow-up time was 20 weeks. The median MRD2 elevation was 0.95 mm (NG), 0.85 mm (HPG), 1.59 mm (ADG) and 1.02 mm (RD). The median MRD2limbus elevation was 1.06 mm (NG), 0.92 mm (HPG), 1.45 mm (ADG) and 1.12 mm (RD). There were no significant differences in MRD2 or MRD2limbus between the 4 groups (p = 0.06 and 0.29, respectively). Reoperation rates were highest with in the hard palate graft group (33%) compared to other techniques (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar degrees of lower eyelid elevation were achieved with all the midface lifting techniques, and complication rates did not significantly differ between techniques. However, the higher reoperation rates with the use of spacer grafts suggest that a no-graft technique may be preferable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Bioengineering autologous cartilage grafts for functional posterior lamellar eyelid reconstruction: A preliminary study in rabbits

The reconstruction of posterior lamellar eyelid defects remains a significant challenge in clinical practice due to anatomical complexity, specialized function, and aesthetic concerns. The ideal substitute for the posterior lamellar should replicate the native tarsoconjunctival tissue, providing both mechanical support for the eyelids and a smooth surface for the globe after implantation. In this study, we present an innovative approach utilizing tissue-engineered cartilage (TEC) grafts generated from rabbit auricular chondrocytes and a commercialized type I collagen sponge to reconstruct critical-sized posterior lamellar defects in rabbits. The TEC grafts demonstrated remarkable mechanical strength and maintained a stable cartilaginous phenotype both in vitro and at 6 months post-implantation in immunodeficient mice. When employed as autografts to reconstruct tarsal plate defects in rabbits' upper eyelids, these TEC grafts successfully restored normal eyelid morphology, facilitated smooth eyelid movement, and preserved the histological structure of the conjunctival epithelium. When applied in bilayered tarsoconjunctival defect reconstruction, these TEC grafts not only maintained the normal contour of the upper eyelid but also supported conjunctival epithelial cell migration and growth from the defect margin towards the centre. These findings highlight that auricular chondrocyte-based TEC grafts hold great promise as potential candidates for clinical posterior lamellar reconstruction. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The complex structure and function of the posterior lamellar eyelid continue to be significant challenges for clinical reconstructive surgeries. In this study, we utilized autologous auricular chondrocyte-based TEC grafts for posterior lamellar eyelid reconstruction in a preclinical rabbit model. The TEC grafts exhibited native cartilaginous histomorphology and comparable mechanical strength to those of the native human tarsal plate. In rabbit models with either tarsal plate defects alone or bilayered tarsoconjunctival defects, TEC grafts successfully restored the normal eyelid contour and movement, as well as supported preservation and growth of conjunctival epithelium. This is the first study to demonstrate autologous TEC grafts can be employed for repairing tarsal plate defects, thereby offering an alternative therapeutic approach for treating posterior lamellar defects in clinic settings.

Surgical Correction of Cicatricial Lower Eyelid Retraction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cicatricial lower eyelid retraction is a challenging condition. It involves scarring of the lower eyelid, which causes it to retract and expose the sclera. This can lead to complications such as dry eye syndrome and corneal melting. It can be caused by trauma, burns, or previous eyelid surgery. Detailed assessment and understanding of eyelid anatomy and retraction are critical for successful surgical planning. Dynamic and static examinations of the eyelid including measurements of the lower eyelid margin reflex distance (MRD2) and scleral show are also essential to determine the appropriate treatment approach.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases with keywords related to cicatricial lower eyelid retraction. The publication language was limited to English after 2000. A total of 29 articles were included for data extraction and analysis.

RESULTS

The main surgical techniques include tarsoconjunctival grafts, spacers, midface lift, and lateral canthal tendon suspension, although no single procedure has been universally recognized as the gold standard. New innovations such as synthetic grafts and xenografts are being explored for their potential in eyelid reconstruction. Severe cases, defined as those with inferior scleral show greater than 2 mm, may require a combination of reconstruction methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Correcting cicatricial lower eyelid retraction is a major challenge in oculoplastic reconstruction. The surgical approach should be individualized, considering the pathologies and etiologies of lid retraction. In-depth knowledge and careful surgical planning are essential for best outcomes. There is no gold standard technique, and postoperative outcomes, complications, and management vary depending on the surgical approach used.

[Conjunctival reconstruction-State of the art of regenerative treatment forms beyond the limbus]

BACKGROUND

The demands on conjunctival replacement tissues are high: they need to be elastic, clinically compatible, surgically feasible and support goblet cell growth.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of currently applied conjunctival replacement tissues and those under investigation.

METHOD

Current publications on clinically applied conjunctival replacement tissues and substrates which are the subject of scientific research and those already tested in animal models are presented and discussed.

RESULTS

Replacement tissues in clinical use are autologous and allogenic conjunctiva, nasal and oral mucous membranes, amniotic membrane and decellularized tissues. Autologous conjunctiva shows good results but is not suitable for large defects due to limited availability. In these cases autologous nasal and oral mucous membranes can be used; however, success is limited in cases of autoimmune diseases. Amniotic membranes are frequently applied clinically but goblet cell growth is limited. Different decellularized tissues are used clinically and goblet cell growth was found in vivo. Robust comparative studies are not yet available. Biological matrices such as fibrin, collagen, elastin, gelatin or hyaluronate and synthetic tissues from the group of polyesters are being investigated in the laboratory and in animal models. These studies show good epithelialization and goblet cell growth in vivo.

CONCLUSION

Transplantation of conjunctiva, nasal and oral mucous membranes and amniotic membranes show satisfactory clinical results but exhibit individual weaknesses. Further studies in animal models and clinical settings are required to further evaluate the benefits of other matrices, such as cell-free tissues or other biological and synthetic matrices.

[Beyond esthetics-Regenerative medicine for severe diseases of the adnexa oculi]

BACKGROUND

Restoration of eyelid and lacrimal functions are important steps on the way to an intact ocular surface. Clinically available substitute tissues or therapeutic options for eyelid reconstruction and lacrimal gland regeneration often reach their limits in patients with severe diseases of the adnexa oculi. Several approaches in regenerative medicine have been intensively researched and clinically tested in recent years. These range from reconstructive approaches with novel tissue matrices in the field of eyelid surgery to stem cell therapies to regenerate lacrimal gland function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The state of the art in the current literature is presented and an overview of clinically applied or currently researched tissues for eyelid reconstruction is given. Furthermore, approaches in stem cell therapy of the lacrimal gland as well as own results are presented.

RESULTS

Acellular dermis has been successfully used for eyelid reconstruction and represents a viable option in cases of limited availability of autologous tissue. In vitro grown cellular constructs or tissues with genetically modified cells have already been successfully applied in dermatology for the treatment of burns or severe genodermatoses. First studies on stem cell therapy for severe dry eye in Sjögren syndrome showed a safe and effective application of mesenchymal stem cells by injection into the lacrimal gland.

CONCLUSION

Due to the limitations of currently available replacement tissues, there is a clinical need for the development of new materials for adnexa oculi reconstruction. Constructs grown in vitro with allogeneic and/or genetically engineered cells are slowly making their way into clinical practice. The efficacy and mode of action of stem cells in severe dry eye are subject matters of current clinical trials.

Surgical Strategies for Eyelid Defect Reconstruction: A Review on Principles and Techniques

Reconstruction of eyelid defects, especially the posterior lamella, remains challenging because of its anatomical complexity, functional considerations, and aesthetic concerns. The goals of eyelid reconstruction include restoring eyelid structure and function and achieving an aesthetically acceptable appearance. An in-depth understanding of the complex eyelid anatomy and several reconstructive principles are mandatory to achieve these goals. Currently, there are multiple surgical treatment options for eyelid reconstruction, including different flaps, grafts, and combinations of them. This comprehensive review outlines the principles of reconstruction and discusses the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of currently available surgical techniques. We also propose our clinical thinking for solving specific clinical questions in eyelid reconstruction and offer perspectives on new potential methodologies in the future.

Clinical observation on healing of tarsal plate defect after reconstruction with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix

Objective

To evaluate the safety, function, and cosmetic outcome of eyelid reconstruction using a xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix as a tarsal plate replacement in the repair of 50 to 100% eyelid defects following excision of large malignant tumours.

Methods

A retrospective, non-comparative, interventional study of 21 eyes was performed over 26 months. Fourteen patients were female and seven were male. In all cases, a xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix was used for total or subtotal replacement of the tarsal plate. The central vertical height of the palpebral fissure was measured immediately after eyelid margin incision and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

In patients who underwent surgery, the mean palpebral fissure height (PFH) was not significantly different between immediately and 1 month after incision (8.10 ± 0.562 mm vs 8.17 ± 0.577 mm, respectively; P > 0.05). After 6 months, PFH was 8.26 ± 0.605 mm, which was significantly different from that immediately after incision (P < 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, all patients had a good aesthetic appearance after eyelid reconstruction, with no obvious graft dissolution or rejection, normal eyelid activity, and normal opening, closing, and lifting function. None of the 21 patients experienced tumour recurrence during postoperative follow-up.

Conclusion

The xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix was a successful tarsal plate replacement. This material is readily available, and a second surgical site is avoided. The xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix is considered a promising alternative material for tarsal replacement in future generations.

Biologics and acellular dermal matrices in head and neck reconstruction: A comprehensive review

Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have been studied extensively in the literature and have gained popularity for various reconstructive and aesthetic purposes. ADMs are composed of a basement membrane and acellular dermal layer of collagen and provide a platform for mucosal epithelization and neovascularization. Combining dermal collagen and essential growth factors allows ADMs to support adequate wound healing and bolster soft-tissue repairs. These dermal matrices can be derived from human cadaveric donor skin (allogenic) or mammalian donor sources (xenogeneic). These dermal substitutes provide the benefit of reducing or eliminating the need for autologous tissue grafts and subsequently minimize donor site morbidity. Many ADMs are currently available in the market, each with variations in processing, manufacturing, storage, preparation, and use. The literature validating ADMs in the head and neck for both cosmetic and reconstructive purposes is evolving rapidly. This review aims to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of the principles of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs), the different types of ADMs, and evaluate common indications, techniques, and outcomes pertaining to select anatomic sites in the head and neck reconstruction.

Outcomes of surgery for epiblepharon accompanied with lower eyelid retraction secondary to buphthalmos in children

IMPORTANCE

In cases of epiblepharon with lower eyelid retraction secondary to glaucoma, correcting epiblepharon alone is ineffective. Combined surgery should be performed to obtain satisfactory outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate outcomes after surgery to correct epiblepharon with lower eyelid retraction secondary to buphthalmos in children.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of six eyes in four patients was performed included lower lid retractor recession combined with marginal rotation with tarsal fixation. The margin reflex distance-2, lagophthalmus, resolution of clinical symptoms, and complications were assessed during 6 to 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

In all cases, epiblepharon and lagophthalmus were corrected, symptoms of photophobia and epiphora were relieved, and the corneal epithelium was repaired. The margin reflex distance-2 decreased and remained normal during the follow-up period, but slightly regressed within 6 months postoperatively.

INTERPRETATION

Epiblepharon caused by buphthalmos in children is often associated with lower eyelid retraction. Lower lid retractor recession combined with marginal rotation with tarsal fixation fundamentally solves the problems of high eyelid tension, lower eyelid retraction, and epiblepharon and reduces the recurrence rate.

The effects of using spacer grafts on lower-eyelid retraction surgery in patients with facial nerve palsy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of the concomitant use of spacer grafts in lateral tarsal strip surgery in patients with facial nerve palsy-related lower-eyelid retraction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent lateral tarsal strip surgery to correct facial nerve palsy-related lower-eyelid retraction were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative decreases in marginal reflex distance-2 values at 1, 2 and 6 months were measured along with the effects of spacer grafts.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (28 males) were included (mean age: 59.56 years). Mean preoperative marginal reflex distance-2 was 6.87 ± 1.34 mm. Twenty patients underwent lateral tarsal strip surgery only (lateral tarsal strip-only); 25 patients underwent lateral tarsal strip surgery using spacer grafts (lateral tarsal strip + graft). Median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 12.0 (6.0-23.0) months. Retraction was significantly improved and maintained at 1, 2 and 6 months postoperatively in all patients (mean marginal reflex distance-2: 3.78 ± 1.06 mm, 4.30 ± 1.23 mm and 4.72 ± 1.11 mm, respectively). Surgical outcomes were significantly better in the lateral tarsal strip + graft than in the lateral tarsal strip-only group (Δmarginal reflex distance-2: 3.92 vs. 2.05 mm at 1 month, p < 0.001; 3.38 vs. 1.61 mm at 2 months, p = 0.001; 2.88 vs. 1.69 at 6 months, p = 0.042). Subgroup analyses by spacer graft type revealed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

The concomitant use of spacer material in lateral tarsal strip surgery yielded better surgical outcomes than lateral tarsal strip surgery alone. The use of spacer grafts should be considered for correcting severe facial nerve palsy-related lower-eyelid retraction.

The Treatment of Post-blepharoplasty Lower Eyelid Retraction

Numerous solutions for post-blepharoplasty lower eyelid retraction are reviewed. Patients require permanent recruitment of skin and soft tissue to lengthen the lower eyelid and control of the lower eyelid shape. The authors use a hand-carved expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) implant held with microscrews to provide volume and felting material at the orbital rim and to permanently fix vertically lifted cheek soft tissue into the lower eyelid. The eyelid margin is also controlled with a hard palate graft inset into the conjunctival surface below the tarsus. This eyelid reconstruction avoids tension on the lateral canthoplasty, a point of failure in other solutions.

Silicone Scaffold Support Using a Bilayer Dermal Regeneration Matrix Template for Correction of Primary or Recurrent Eyelid Retraction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a bilayer dermal regenerative matrix for primary or complex/recurrent eyelid retraction.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients undergoing eyelid retraction repair using the bilayer dermal regenerative matrix from 2005 to 2019. Nineteen eyelid surgeries from 15 patients were identified. Collected data included patient demographics, symptoms, preoperative/postoperative lower eyelid position, inferior scleral show, lagophthalmos, etiology of retraction, history of prior retraction surgeries, major/minor complications, and follow-up duration (minimum 6 months). Postoperative measurements were taken at a minimum of 1 week, 3-6 weeks, 2-4 months, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 90% of cases had good improvement of lower eyelid retraction (defined as 1 mm or less below the inferior limbus). Postoperative elevation of the lower eyelid ranged 1-3.5 mm compared with preoperative measurements. When used in the upper eyelid for conjunctival scarring, the implant improved the superior fornix depth. Complications were minimal and included transient conjunctival injection, eyelid edema, and foreign body sensation. No patients requested early removal of the silicone layer due to ocular pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The bilayer dermal regeneration matrix template may be considered a reasonable alternative to other spacers to reduce the vertical palpebral fissure and eyelid malposition in primary, complex, or recurrent cases. It also worked well for first-line correction of thyroid retraction, which tend to be more challenging due to globe proptosis. Suboptimal results may have occurred due to active cicatrizing conjunctival disease, or residual negative vector of the cheek and orbit. High cost may be a consideration, and the bilayer dermal regeneration matrix template was not studied directly against hard palate and other spacer materials.

Decellularized xenografts in regenerative medicine: From processing to clinical application

Decellularized xenografts are an inherent component of regenerative medicine. Their preserved structure, mechanical integrity and biofunctional composition have well established them in reparative medicine for a diverse range of clinical indications. Nonetheless, their performance is highly influenced by their source (ie species, age, tissue) and processing (ie decellularization, crosslinking, sterilization and preservation), which govern their final characteristics and determine their success or failure for a specific clinical target. In this review, we provide an overview of the different sources and processing methods used in decellularized xenografts fabrication and discuss their effect on the clinical performance of commercially available decellularized xenografts.

Autologous dermis graft versus conchal cartilage graft for managing lower eyelid retraction: A comparative study

PURPOSE

Lower eyelid management is challenging. The conchal cartilage is often considered a spacer of choice for treating lower eyelid retraction. However, dermis graft has also recently been shown to be a viable spacer. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of dermis graft to that of conchal cartilage graft in this indication.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted in patients who underwent lower eyelid lengthening with autologous dermis graft (group 1) or autologous conchal cartilage graft (group 2). The main outcome measure was the reduction in inferior scleral show (ISS) assessed by three independent masked surgeons. Secondary outcome measures was the assessment of lagophthalmos and corneal keratitis. Complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-five eyelids of 23 patients were included: 11 and 14 eyelids, respectively in group 1 (dermis graft) and group 2 (conchal cartilage graft). Patient mean follow-up was 12.3 (±12.5) and 7.1 (±7.7) months, respectively. No statistical differences in postoperative ISS reduction, lagophthalmos and exposure keratitis was observed (p = 0.540, p = 0.946, p = 0.934, respectively). Three patients experienced a grade I Clavien-Dindo complication in group 1 and one patient experienced a grade II complication in group 2 (p = 0.540).

CONCLUSION

Autologous dermis grafts and conchal cartilage grafts provide favorable outcomes without major complications.

Porcine dermal matrix sandwich graft for lower eyelid reconstruction

Purpose: To report the clinical outcomes of porcine acellular dermal matrix implants sandwiched between skin and conjunctival flaps for lower eyelid reconstruction following Mohs surgery. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients with lower eyelid defects following Mohs surgery treated using a porcine acellular dermal matrix sandwich graft from 2013 to 2018. Patient demographics, defect size and characteristics, and collagen matrix implant dimensions were evaluated. Postoperative course and complications were also reviewed. Results: The dermal matrix sandwich graft was performed in 13 cases (12 patients). Average horizontal marginal defect width was 11.7 mm (range: 6-16 mm). Mean width of the implanted dermal matrix was 7.7 mm (range: 5-9 mm). There were no instances of infection or graft failure. The reconstructed lid had an excellent marginal contour in 11 cases (84.6%), while 2 had minimal irregularities. All patients had an excellent thickness of the reconstructed margin. One patient (7.7%) required cauterization of overgrown marginal conjunctiva after surgery. Two patients (15.4%) experienced symptomatic trichiasis, requiring electrolysis (n = 1) and epilation (n = 1). Conclusions: The dermal matrix sandwich graft is an effective method for marginal defect repair when the remaining conjunctiva and skin are sufficient to develop the necessary flaps. While the resolution of edema and erythema may take several months, an excellent final result is achieved in the majority of cases. Complications are mild, relatively uncommon, and similar to those encountered in other reconstructive procedures. This single-stage, tissue-sparing technique preserves the capability of performing future tarsoconjunctival flaps or lateral canthal procedures, should the need arise.

Efficacy of porcine acellular dermal matrix in the management of lower eyelid retraction: case series and review of the literature

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of Permacol™, a decellularized porcine dermal-derived membrane, as a spacer in the management of lower eyelid retraction. The efficacy of sizing and insertion was investigated, as well as complications. The literature was also reviewed to compare this material with other porcine-derived grafts in use for the management of lower eyelid retraction.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series observing all patients who received lower eyelid Permacol implants by the two senior authors (AAM, TGH) for the management of lower eyelid retraction. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, graft size, degree of postoperative lid advancement, and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients (16 eyelids) received Permacol implants for correction of lower eyelid retraction during the study period of 18 months (January 2015 to July 2017). Ten procedures were related to thyroid eye disease, 3 for reconstruction, 2 postcosmetic lower lid blepharoplasty, and one acquired anophthalmic socket. The average preoperative inferior scleral show (ISS) was 1.74 mm, and the average postoperative ISS was 0.82 mm. There was a mean lower eyelid elevation of 0.91 mm (p < 0.005, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and mean ratio of graft height:preoperative ISS was 3.8:1 over a median of 8 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Permacol is a safe and effective alternative to autologous tissues for use as a spacer in patients with lower eyelid retraction of varying etiologies. It does undergo some resorption with time, however this can be predicted and incorporated into surgical planning; we recommend an implant height:ISS ratio of 4:1.

Inflammatory Reaction to Decellularized Porcine-Derived Xenograft for Lower Eyelid Retraction

A 54-year-old woman underwent uncomplicated bilateral lower eyelid surgery for eyelid retraction using porcine decellularized membrane graft (TarSys). Left lower eyelid pain began several months after surgery and persisted until the graft was removed 15 months after implantation. The opposite eyelid graft caused no symptoms. Histologically, the lesion consisted of acellular collagen surrounded by florid granulomatous inflammation. Although the inflammatory reaction suggested a cell-mediated immune response, this pathway of injury is difficult to reconcile given the asymptomatic opposite eyelid. The literature reflects limited experience with porcine decellularized membranes of the eyelid. Complications and long-term tolerance remain to be determined.

Bipedicle Dermis Fat Graft for Orbital Volume Augmentation and Repair of Lower Eyelid Retraction in an Anophthalmic Socket With Prior Orbital Implant Placement

Buphthalmos can create treatment challenges for socket rehabilitation following enucleation due to compression atrophy and mechanical stretching of adnexal tissues. The authors report a case demonstrating a surgical technique for simultaneous volume augmentation of the anophthalmic socket, expansion of the conjunctival fornix, and repair of lower eyelid retraction in a patient with history of buphthalmos and a previously placed 22 mm orbital implant at the time of enucleation. The authors utilized a single-stage, bipedicle dermis fat graft. Postoperatively, the patient demonstrated improvement in lower eyelid position, lower eyelid volume, improved prosthesis fit, improved three-dimensional projection of the ocular prosthesis, and an improvement in the superior sulcus deformity. Bipedicle dermis fat grafts are an option for surgical rehabilitation of the anophthalmic socket when orbital volume deficiency, conjunctival fornix contracture, and eyelid retraction are present and an adequately sized orbital implant has previously been placed.