1
|
Strohl M, Sweeny L. Advances in Midface Reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2025; 33:57-65. [PMID: 39523036 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2024.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
The complexity of the midface structure and its importance to a multitude of functions present the reconstructive surgeon with unique challenges. The midface is an area that is crucial both functionally and esthetically. Midface reconstructions can make profound differences in form and function. This review focuses on complex midface and maxillary reconstructions requiring free tissue transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Strohl
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Louisville, 401 East Chestnut Street, Suite 170, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Larissa Sweeny
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami - Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; Surgical Care Division, Miami Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kortman MCP, Jansma J, Schepers RH, Slump CH, Merema BJ, Kraeima J. A method for accuracy of placement analysis on radiolucent polyether-ether-keton facial implants: A case series. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2024; 52:1082-1087. [PMID: 39004536 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Facial asymmetry is defined as a bilateral difference between facial components. Correction, often desired by the patient, can be performed with the aim of bone born patient-specific solid implants designed using 3D CAD software. This treatment is embedded in the daily practice of today's healthcare. However, an analysis of the implant's accuracy of placement has not been reported. This case series describes the accuracy analysis of bone born aesthetic facial implants manufactured out of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK). The accuracy analysis was based on postoperative (cone beam) computed tomography ((CB)CT) data and preoperative 3D planning. The analysis showed a median entry point error of 0.7 mm (min: 0.1, max: 3.3, interquartile range: 0.78). The median maximal orientation error was 5.5° (min: 0.1, max: 36.8, interquartile range: 7.13). Both parameters showed an excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement with an ICC above 0.84. The described cases show that the analysis method is an objective approach for determining the accuracy of PSI placement and indicates that these implants can be placed accurately on the osseous face.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C P Kortman
- University of Twente, Technical Medical Centre, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging (M3i), Faculty of Science & Technology, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - J Jansma
- Dpt of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R H Schepers
- Dpt of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - C H Slump
- University of Twente, Technical Medical Centre, Robotics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mathematics and Computer Science, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - B J Merema
- 3D Lab, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Dpt of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J Kraeima
- 3D Lab, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Dpt of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reconstructive Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 81:E263-E299. [PMID: 37833026 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
|
4
|
Raveggi E, Sobrero F, Gerbino G. Patient Specific Implants for Orbital Reconstruction in the Treatment of Silent Sinus Syndrome: Two Case Reports. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040578. [PMID: 37108964 PMCID: PMC10141094 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Silent sinus syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by ipsilateral enophthalmos and hypoglobus following a collapse of the orbital floor, in the presence of asymptomatic long-term maxillary sinusitis. It results in enophthalmos, hypoglobus and deepening of the superior palpebral sulcus. A standardized treatment protocol for this infrequent syndrome has not yet been established. The management includes restoration of maxillary sinus ventilation with functional endoscopic sinus surgery and orbital reconstruction, either concurrently or separately. In this paper, the authors presented two patients successfully treated with patient-specific implants, and intraoperative navigation. These cases highlight the benefit of computer-assisted planning and titanium patient-specific implants in the management of silent sinus syndrome. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that described the use of PSI with titanium spacers performed with the aid of intraoperative navigation for SSS treatment. Advantages, drawbacks of this technique and treatment alternatives currently available in the literature were also discussed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Landau Prat D, Massarwa S, Zohar A, Priel A, Sagiv O, Zloto O, Ben Simon GJ. Patient-Specific Orbital Implants Vs. Pre-Formed Implants for Internal Orbital Reconstruction. Semin Ophthalmol 2023; 38:365-370. [PMID: 36639878 DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2166353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the outcome of orbital blowout fracture repair by means of pre-formed porous-polyethylene titanium implants (PFI) vs patient-specific porous-polyethylene implants (PSI). METHODS Retrospective cohort study. Baseline characteristics, ophthalmic examination results, ocular motility, fracture type, the timing of surgery, implant type, and final relative enophthalmos of all patients operated on for blow-out fractures in a single center were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients (mean age 39 years, 9 females) were enrolled. Sixteen underwent fracture repair with PFI and 11 with PSI at 11 months (median) post-trauma. Mean follow-up duration was 1.1 years. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvement in primary or vertical gaze diplopia (P = .03, χ2). Relative enophthalmos improved from -3.2 preoperative PFI to -1.7 mm postoperative PFI, and from -3.0 mm preoperative PSI to -1.1 mm postoperative PSI (P= .1). PSI patients had non-significantly less postoperative enophthalmos and globe asymmetry than PFI patients. The outcome was not influenced by previous surgery, age, sex, number of orbital walls involved in the initial trauma, or medial wall involvement (linear regression). Both groups sustained complications unrelated to implant choice. CONCLUSION Both PSI and PFI yielded good outcomes in this study. PSI may be a good alternative to PFI in primary or secondary orbital blowout fracture repair with less enophthalmos and globe asymmetry, in spite of the possible disadvantages of production time, a relatively larger design, and challenging insertion. Since it is a mirror image of the uninjured orbit, it may be beneficial in extensive fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphna Landau Prat
- Orbital Ophthalmic Plastic & Lacrimal Surgery Institute, Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel.,The Sheba Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Division of Ophthalmology, Oculoplastic and Orbital Surgery Service, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and The Edwin and Fannie Gray Hall, Center for Human Appearance, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Said Massarwa
- Plastic Surgery Department, Hadassah Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Assa Zohar
- Orbital Ophthalmic Plastic & Lacrimal Surgery Institute, Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ayelet Priel
- Orbital Ophthalmic Plastic & Lacrimal Surgery Institute, Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Oded Sagiv
- Orbital Ophthalmic Plastic & Lacrimal Surgery Institute, Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Ofira Zloto
- Orbital Ophthalmic Plastic & Lacrimal Surgery Institute, Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel.,The Sheba Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Guy J Ben Simon
- Orbital Ophthalmic Plastic & Lacrimal Surgery Institute, Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel.,The Sheba Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Larochelle RD, Mann SE, Ifantides C. 3D Printing in Eye Care. Ophthalmol Ther 2021; 10:733-752. [PMID: 34327669 PMCID: PMC8320416 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-021-00379-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Three-dimensional printing enables precise modeling of anatomical structures and has been employed in a broad range of applications across medicine. Its earliest use in eye care included orbital models for training and surgical planning, which have subsequently enabled the design of custom-fit prostheses in oculoplastic surgery. It has evolved to include the production of surgical instruments, diagnostic tools, spectacles, and devices for delivery of drug and radiation therapy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased demand for personal protective equipment and supply chain shortages inspired many institutions to 3D-print their own eye protection. Cataract surgery, the most common procedure performed worldwide, may someday make use of custom-printed intraocular lenses. Perhaps its most alluring potential resides in the possibility of printing tissues at a cellular level to address unmet needs in the world of corneal and retinal diseases. Early models toward this end have shown promise for engineering tissues which, while not quite ready for transplantation, can serve as a useful model for in vitro disease and therapeutic research. As more institutions incorporate in-house or outsourced 3D printing for research models and clinical care, ethical and regulatory concerns will become a greater consideration. This report highlights the uses of 3D printing in eye care by subspecialty and clinical modality, with an aim to provide a useful entry point for anyone seeking to engage with the technology in their area of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Larochelle
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado, Sue Anschutz-Rodgers Eye Center, 1675 Aurora Court, F731, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Scott E Mann
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Cristos Ifantides
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado, Sue Anschutz-Rodgers Eye Center, 1675 Aurora Court, F731, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Habib LA, Yoon MK. Patient specific implants in orbital reconstruction: A pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2021; 24:101222. [PMID: 34746511 PMCID: PMC8554165 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Successful repair of the orbital skeleton restores function and cosmesis by normalizing globe position and allowing full motility of the extraocular muscles. Routine repairs are successful with standard implants. However, defects that are irregular or cause volume deficiency can be challenging to repair. The development of patient specific implants (PSI) offers an additional tool in complex cases. Herein, we report our experience using PSI for orbital reconstruction. Methods An IRB-approved review was conducted of consecutive patients who received PSI from 8/2016–9/2018. Demographic and examination findings were recorded. PSI was designed using high-density porous polyethylene or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and implanted for repair. The postoperative course was reviewed for outcomes and complications. Results Eight patients were identified. Two had silent sinus syndrome, 3 were complex facial fracture revisions, and 3 were post-oncologic reconstruction. Seven received porous polyethylene implants, and 1 had a PEEK implant. Mean follow up time was 10.2 months (3.3–28.3). All had an improved functional and aesthetic result. Diplopia and enophthalmos completely resolved in 60% of fracture and silent sinus patients. All fracture and silent sinus patients were orthotropic without diplopia in primary gaze at last follow up. Tumor patients had improvement in symmetry and functionality. There were no complications. Conclusion and importance Complex orbital skeleton derangements can be difficult to repair and standard implants may incompletely resolve the anatomic problem. In challenging cases, PSI may better achieve an aesthetically and anatomically successful outcome and improve functionality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa A Habib
- Department of Ophthalmology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael K Yoon
- Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|