Tempo-spatial discrimination is lower for noxious stimuli than for innocuous stimuli

Topical capsaicin modulates the two-point discrimination threshold-Modulation depends on stimulation modality and intensity

BACKGROUND

Spatial acuity concerns the ability to localize and discriminate sensory input and is often tested using the two-point discrimination threshold (2PDT). Sensitization of the pain system can affect the spatial acuity, but it is unclear how 2PDTs of different testing modalities are affected. The aim was to investigate if the 2PDTs for mechanical and heat stimulation at different intensities were modulated by topical capsaicin sensitization.

METHODS

30 healthy subjects were divided into either a capsaicin or a placebo group. The 2PDT was tested using two different modalities, mechanical and thermal (laser) delivered at innocuous and noxious intensities. The 2PDT were determined at baseline and re-assessed 48 h later. In the follow-up session, the subjects either had a capsaicin patch (8%) or placebo patch placed in the testing area for 30 min before re-testing the 2PDT.

RESULTS

The 2PDT was highly dependent on stimulation modality and intensity. The lowest 2PDT was found for innocuous mechanical stimuli (40.0 mm, 95% CI 38.1-41.9 mm), and the highest 2PDT was found for innocuous thermal stimuli (81.7 mm, 95% CI 73.9-89.5 mm). Topical capsaicin generally increased the 2PDT, but this was only significant for innocuous mechanical stimuli. The perceived intensity of the stimuli was increased following capsaicin and was generally higher for noxious stimuli than for innocuous stimuli (ANOVA, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that capsaicin provoked pain sensitization increased the 2PDT. The 2PDT tested using innocuous mechanical stimuli showed less variable results indicating that this test is most suitable to detect this aspect of spatial acuity.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study investigated how the two-point discrimination threshold (2PDT) can be modulated by topical capsaicin. The 2PDT was assessed for two different modalities (thermal and mechanical) and for two different intensities (innocuous and noxious) before and after capsaicin. The results showed that the 2PDT was generally impaired following capsaicin, but this was only significant for mechanical innocuous stimuli. Furthermore, it was shown that mechanical innocuous stimuli assessed the 2PDT with lower variability than other combinations.

Investigation of directional discrimination in the nociceptive system using temperature-controlled laser stimuli

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous laser stimulation has commonly been employed to investigate the thermal properties of the nociceptive system. The aim of this study was to investigate how a temperature-controlled laser system improves the assessment of directional discrimination in the nociceptive system.

METHODS

In total, twenty healthy volunteers participated in this study. To determine the directional discrimination threshold (stimulation length 50% correct, expressed in mm), thermal stimuli were delivered using a diode laser and the laser beam was perpendicularly displaced across the skin to give a linear stimulation in four different directions (distal, proximal, lateral and medial) and displacement lengths (3 for lateral-medial and 5 for distal-proximal). Two temperature control modes were used in the stimulation system, open-loop and closed-loop control. The subjects had to report the perceived stimulus direction, the degree of certainty regarding the perceived direction and the intensity of the perceived stimulus (0-10 numerical rating scale, 3: pain threshold).

RESULTS

During closed-loop control, the orientation of stimuli was discriminated significantly more accurately than during open-loop control. During closed-loop control, the directional discrimination threshold was 31.9 and 26.1 mm for distal-proximal and lateral-medial directed stimuli, respectively. A numerical rating scale was significantly higher for the lateral/medial directions. Moreover, the variability of the discrimination threshold is reduced in the closed-loop control system.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings show that discrimination ability is better in the lateral-medial directions compared to the distal-proximal directions. This study indicates that using a system enabling closed-loop temperature control, allows more robust probing of the temporo-spatial mechanisms in the nociceptive system.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study shows that a newly developed temperature-controlled laser stimulation system enhances the possibilities to investigate the nociceptive temporo-spatial integration, as shown by a less variable directional discrimination threshold. The results also show that different orthogonal directions are discriminated differently. This new method allows a better investigation of the combined temporal and spatial mechanisms in the nociceptive system.

Influence of skin type and laser wavelength on laser-evoked potentials

BACKGROUND

Infrared laser stimulation is a valuable tool in pain research, its primary application being the recording of laser-evoked brain potentials (LEPs). Different types of laser stimulators, varying in their skin penetrance, are likely to have a large influence on the LEPs, when stimulating different skin types. The aim of this study was to investigate how LEPs depend on laser type and skin location.

METHODS

Two different laser stimulators (CO2 and Nd:YAP) were used to compare LEPs in healthy subjects. Stimuli were delivered to the hand dorsum and palm to investigate the effects of skin type on the evoked responses. Stimulus-evoked brain responses were recorded using EEG and perceived intensity ratings were recorded. Computational modelling was used to investigate the observed differences.

RESULTS

LEPs evoked by stimulation of the hairy skin were similar between CO2 and Nd:YAP stimulation. In contrast, LEPs elicited from the palm were markedly different and barely present for CO2 stimulation. There was a significant interaction between laser type and skin type (RM-ANOVA, p < 0.05) likely due to smaller CO2 LEPs in the palm. CO2 stimuli to the palm also elicited significantly lower perceived intensities. The computational model showed that the observed differences were explainable by the laser absorption characteristics and skin thickness affecting the temperature profile at the dermo-epidermal junction (DEJ).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that LEP elicitation depends on the combination of laser penetrance and skin type. Low penetrance stimuli, from a CO2 laser, elicited significantly lower LEPs and perceived intensities in the palm.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study showed that the elicitation of laser-evoked potentials in healthy humans greatly depends on the combination of laser stimulator type and skin type. It was shown that high penetrance laser stimuli are capable of eliciting responses in both hairy and glabrous skin, whereas low penetrance stimuli barely elicited responses from the glabrous skin. Computational modelling was used to demonstrate that the results could be fully explained by the combination of laser type and skin thickness.

A novel temperature-controlled laser system to uniformly activate cutaneous thermal receptors during movable thermal stimulation

Objective. Laser stimulators have been widely used in pain studies to selectively activate Aδand C nociceptors without coactivation of mechanoreceptors. Temperature-controlled laser systems have been implemented with low-temperature variations during stimulations, however, these systems purely enabled stationary stimulation. This study aimed to implement, test and validate a new laser stimulation system that controls skin temperature by continuously adjusting laser output during stimulus movement to allow accurate investigation of tempo-spatial mechanisms in the nociceptive system.Approach. For validation, laser stimuli were delivered to the right forearm of eight healthy subjects using a diode laser. The laser beam was displaced across the skin to deliver a moving thermal stimulation to the skin surface. To test the function and feasibility of the system, different stimulation parameters were investigated involving two control modes (open-loop and closed-loop), three displacement velocities (5, 10 and 12 mm s^-1), two intensities (high 46 °C and low 42 °C), two stimulus lengths (20 and 100 mm) and two directions (distal and proximal).Main results. During closed-loop control, the stimulation error and variation of stimulation temperatures were significantly smaller than during open-loop control. The standard deviation of stimulation temperatures increased significantly with stimulation intensity and displacement length.Significance. This study showed that more accurate, less variable laser stimulations were delivered to the skin using closed-loop control during a movable stimulus. The more uniform skin temperature during stimuli is likely to ensure a more uniform nociceptor activation.

Spinal spatial integration of nociception and its functional role assessed via the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and psychophysical measures in healthy humans

Animal studies have previously shown that deep dorsal horn neurons play a role in the processing of spatial characteristics of nociceptive information in mammals. Human studies have supported the role of the spinal neurons; however, the mechanisms involved, and its significance, remain to be clarified. The aim of this study was to investigate spatial aspects of the spinal integration of concurrent nociceptive electrical stimuli in healthy humans using the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex (NWR) as an objective indication of spinal nociceptive processing. Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in the study. Electrical stimuli were delivered, using five electrodes located across the sole of the foot in a mediolateral disposition, as a single or double simultaneous stimuli with varying Inter-Electrode Distances (IEDs). The stimulation intensity was set at 1.5× NWR threshold (TA muscle). The size of the NWR was quantified in the 60-180 ms poststimulus window as a primary outcome measure. Psychophysical measures were secondary outcomes. Single stimulation elicited significantly smaller NWRs and perceived intensity than double stimulation (p < .01), suggesting the presence of spatial summation occurring within the spinal processing. During double stimulation, increasing the inter-electrode distance produced significantly smaller NWR sizes (p < .05) but larger pain intensity ratings (p < .05). By the NWR, spatial summation was shown to affect the nociceptive processing within the spinal cord. The inhibited motor response obtained when simultaneously stimulating the medial and lateral side of the sole of the foot suggests the presence of an inhibitory mechanism with a functional, behaviorally oriented function.

Tempo-spatial integration of nociceptive stimuli assessed via the nociceptive withdrawal reflex in healthy humans

Spatial information of nociceptive stimuli applied in the skin of healthy humans is integrated in the spinal cord to determine the appropriate withdrawal reflex response. Double-simultaneous stimulus applied in different skin sites are integrated, eliciting a larger reflex response. The temporal characteristics of the stimuli also modulate the reflex, e.g., by temporal summation. The primary aim of this study was to investigate how the combined tempo-spatial aspects of two stimuli are integrated in the nociceptive system. This was investigated by delivering single- and double-simultaneous stimulation and sequential stimulation with different interstimulus intervals (ISIs ranging 30-500 ms) to the sole of the foot of 15 healthy subjects. The primary outcome measure was the size of the nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) and biceps femoris (BF) muscles. Pain intensity was measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS) scale. Results showed spatial summation in both TA and BF when delivering simultaneous stimulation. Simultaneous stimulation provoked larger reflexes than sequential stimulation in TA, but not in BF. Larger ISIs elicited significantly larger reflexes in TA, whereas the opposite pattern occurred in BF. This differential modulation between proximal and distal muscles suggests the presence of spinal circuits eliciting a functional reflex response based on the specific tempo-spatial characteristics of a noxious stimulus. No modulation was observed in pain intensity ratings across ISIs. Absence of modulation in the pain intensity ratings argues for an integrative mechanism located within the spinal cord governed by a need for efficient withdrawal from a potentially harmful stimulus.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Tempo-spatial integration of electrical noxious stimuli was studied using the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and a perceived intensity. Tibialis anterior and biceps femoris muscles were differentially modulated by the temporal characteristics of the stimuli and stimulated sites. These findings suggest that spinal neurons are playing an important role in the tempo-spatial integration of nociceptive information, leading to a reflex response that is distributed across multiple spinal cord segments and governed by an efficient defensive withdrawal strategy.

The two-point discrimination threshold depends both on the stimulation noxiousness and modality

The two-point discrimination threshold (2PDT) has been used to investigate the integration of sensory information, especially in relation to spatial acuity. The 2PDT has been investigated for both innocuous mechanical stimuli and noxious thermal stimuli; however, previous studies used different stimulation modalities to compare innocuous and noxious stimuli. This study investigated the 2PDT in 19 healthy participants, using both thermal (laser) and mechanical stimulation modalities. Within each modality, both innocuous and noxious intensities were applied. Concurrent point stimuli were applied to the right volar forearm, with separation distances of 0-120 mm, in steps of 10 mm. 0 mm corresponds to a single point. Following each stimulus, the participants indicated the number of perceived points (1 or 2) and the perceived intensity (NRS: 0: no perception, 3: pain threshold, 10: maximum pain). The order of stimulation modality, intensity and distance was randomized. The 2PDT for innocuous and noxious mechanical stimuli was 34.7 mm and 47.1 mm, respectively. For thermal stimuli, the 2PDT was 80.5 mm for innocuous stimuli and 66.9 mm for noxious stimuli. The average NRS for thermal stimuli was 1.6 for innocuous intensities and 4.0 for noxious intensities, while for mechanical stimuli, the average NRS was 0.9 for innocuous intensities and 3.6 for noxious intensities. This study showed that the 2PDT highly depends on both stimulation modality and intensity. Within each modality, noxious intensities modulates the 2PDT differently, i.e., noxious intensities lowers the 2PDT for thermal stimuli, but increases the 2PDT for mechanical stimuli.

Not as "blurred" as expected? Acuity and spatial summation in the pain system

ABSTRACT

Spatial acuity measured by 2-point discrimination (2PD) threshold and spatial summation of pain (SSp) are useful paradigms to probe the pain system in humans. Whether the results of these paradigms are influenced by different stimulus modalities and intensities is unclear. The aim of this study was to test 2PD controlling the stimulus modality and the intensity and to investigate the effect of modality on SSp. Thirty-seven healthy volunteers were tested for 2PDs with 2 stimulus modalities (electrocutaneous and mechanical) and intensity (noxious and innocuous). For each condition, participants received stimuli to either 1 or 2 points on their lower back with different distances (2-14 cm, steps of 2 cm). It was found that 2PDs were significantly smaller for noxious stimuli for both modalities. By contrast, between-modality comparison reproduced previous reports of impaired acuity for noxious stimulation. Higher pain intensities were reported when a larger area was stimulated (SSp), independent of the modality. Furthermore, reported pain intensities were higher when the distance between 2 stimulated areas was increased from 2 to 6 cm (P < 0.001), 8 cm (P < 0.01), and 14 cm (P < 0.01). 2PDs determined by mechanical and electrocutaneous stimuli were significantly correlated within both stimulus intensities, ie, innocuous (r = 0.34, P < 0.05) and noxious (r = 0.35, P < 0.05). The current results show 3 novel findings: (1) the precision of the pain system might be higher than in the innocuous (tactile) system when mechanical and electrocutaneous modalities are used, (2) the pattern of distance-based and area-based SSp seems to be comparable irrespective of the modality applied (mechanical and electrocutaneous), and (3) both modalities are moderately correlated.

Widespread impairment of tactile spatial acuity and sensory-motor control in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain with neuropathic features

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in tactile spatial acuity and in sensory-motor control between patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNSNP) with and without neuropathic features (NF), as well as asymptomatic.

METHODS

183 participants were included, 135 had CNSNP classified by the Self-report version of Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs scale in order to identify pain with NF: (1) CNSNP with NF (n = 67), (2) CNSNP with No-NF (n = 68), and (3) asymptomatic subjects (n = 48). The following tests in the following order were assessed after determining the participants' clinical characteristics: 1) two-point discrimination, 2) joint position error, and 3) craniocervical flexion test.

RESULTS

Both neck pain groups showed a significant reduction in their ability to discriminate two points in the trapezium and masseter, as well as a significant deficit of a moderate to large magnitude in craniocervical motor control compared with the asymptomatic group. However, only the CNSNP with NF group showed a significant impairment of the two-point discrimination in the tibia (d = 0.57) and a significant impairment of the kinesthetic sense (neck rotation, d = 0.73; neck lateroflexion, d = 0.69), compared with the asymptomatic group. Significant differences in pain intensity, disability and psychological factors between the CNSNP groups were also found, observing the poorest results in the NF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CNSNP with NF have a greater sensory, motor and psychological impairment than those without NF, more pain intensity, disability and negative psychological factors, as well as more impaired tactile spatial acuity in areas remote to the pain and impaired cervical kinesthetic sense.

Rating the Intensity of a Laser Stimulus, but Not Attending to Changes in Its Location or Intensity Modulates the Laser-Evoked Cortical Activity

Top-down attention towards nociceptive stimuli can be modulated by asking participants to pay attention to specific features of a stimulus, or to provide a rating about its intensity/unpleasantness. Whether and how these different top-down processes may lead to different modulations of the cortical response to nociceptive stimuli remains an open question. We recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to brief nociceptive laser stimuli in 24 healthy participants while they performed a task in which they had to compare two subsequent stimuli on their Spatial location (Location task) or Intensity (Intensity Task). In two additional blocks (Location + Ratings, and Intensity + Ratings) participants had to further provide a rating of the perceived intensity of the stimulus. Such a design allowed us to investigate whether focusing on spatial or intensity features of a nociceptive stimulus and rating its intensity would exert different effects on the EEG responses. We did not find statistical evidence for an effect on the signal while participants were focusing on different features of the signal. We only observed a significant cluster difference in frontoparietal leads at approximately 300-500 ms post-stimulus between the magnitude of the signal in the Intensity and Intensity + Rating conditions, with a less negative response in the Intensity + Rating condition in frontal electrodes, and a less positive amplitude in parietal leads. We speculatively propose that activity in those electrodes and time window reflects magnitude estimation processes. Moreover, the smaller frontal amplitude in the Intensity + Rating condition can be explained by greater working memory engagement known to reduce the magnitude of the EEG signal. We conclude that different top-down attentional processes modulate responses to nociceptive laser stimuli at different electrodes and time windows depending on the underlying processes that are engaged.

Cutaneous nociceptive sensitization affects the directional discrimination – but not the 2-point discrimination

Background and aims

Several pain conditions have been shown to reduce the discriminative abilities of external stimuli. The aim of this study was to investigate how cutaneous sensitization affects the tempo-spatial discrimination for both painful laser stimulation and mechanical stimulation.

Methods

Fifteen healthy subjects were presented with two different stimulation paradigms, a continuous line stimulation and a 2-point stimulation. Line stimulations were delivered in two different directions in lengths of 25, 50, 75, and 100 mm. Two-point distances from 0 to 100 mm were tested. The subjects reported the perceived intensity, and either direction (line stimulations) or number of perceived points (2-point stimulations). All stimuli were tested both before and after topical capsaicin (8% concentration) sensitization (30 min).

Results

All mechanical line stimulations were reported correctly before capsaicin and 3 stimulations (out of 240) were reported incorrectly after capsaicin. For the laser line stimulation, the directional discrimination threshold (DDT) was 69.5 mm before capsaicin and 76.3 mm after capsaicin. The 2-point discrimination threshold for laser stimulation was 70.3 mm before capsaicin and 68.0 mm after, for the mechanical stimuli it was 31.5 mm before capsaicin and 31.0 mm after capsaicin. The perceived intensities were increased for the laser line stimulations after capsaicin (linear mixed model (LMM), p < 0.001) and increased with stimulation length (LMM, p < 0.001). For mechanical stimuli, NRS was increased following capsaicin (LMM, p < 0.001). The intensities for both mechanical and laser 2-point stimuli increased after capsaicin and increased with distance between points (LMM, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

The findings show how cutaneous sensitization appears to affect directional discrimination to a larger extent than the 2-point discrimination.

Implications

This study is the first to investigate how directional discrimination is altered during sensitization. If such measures can be optimized they may provide a new method to probe the neural mechanisms in pain patients.

Topographic mapping of pain sensitivity of the lower back – a comparison of healthy controls and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

Background and aims

The choice of testing site for quantitative sensory testing (QST) of pain sensitivity is important and previous studies have demonstrated patterns in pain sensitivity within discrete areas in different body regions. Some areas are characterized by a relatively high degree of spatial pain discrimination and recognizable patterns of pain referral, whilst others are not. The lumbar region is likely to have relatively low pain acuity and overlapping of pain referral. The current study was conducted to determine whether patterns of pain sensitivity (detection thresholds) could be identified in the lower back, whether differences in such patterns exist between different groups and whether such patterns could help identify a clinical source of pain and localized increased pain sensitivity.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with non-specific chronic low back pain and 21 healthy controls were tested for pressure and heat pain thresholds on 30 pre-defined locations over the mid and lower back. Topographical maps of mean pain thresholds and variability were produced, inspected visually and analyzed statistically. Between group differences in pain threshold were analyzed statistically as an indicator of widespread increased pain sensitivity. Evidence of segmental increased pain sensitivity was examined by group statistical comparison of mid-line lower range.

Results

A clear pattern of higher pain thresholds in the mid-line was evident in both groups and for both pain modalities. No discernible patterns were evident for variability within groups, but marked differences were seen between groups: variability for pressure pain thresholds appeared similar between groups, however for heat pain threshold, variability was uniformly low in the control group and uniformly high in the patient group. A highly significant (p<0.0001) difference in pain thresholds for pressure and heat was found with patients exhibiting lower thresholds than controls. No between group difference was found for mid-line lower range for either modality (p>0.05).

Conclusions

The current study supports previous findings of widespread, increased pain sensitivity in chronic non-specific low-back pain patients. It also indicates that there are discernible and similar topographical patterns of pain sensitivity in the dorsal area in both groups, but that this pattern is related to the lateral position of the test site and not the segmental level. Specific segments with increased pain sensitivity could not be identified in the patient group, which casts doubt on the utility of pressure and heat pain thresholds as indicators of the clinical source of spinal pain – at least in a population of chronic non-specific low-back pain.

Implications

In a cohort of chronic non-specific low-back pain patients and with the chosen methodology, topographical QST mapping in the lumbar region does not appear useful for identifying the spinal segment responsible for clinical pain, but it does demonstrate widespread group differences in pain sensitivity.