1
|
Trager RJ, Cupler ZA, Srinivasan R, Casselberry RM, Perez JA, Dusek JA. Chiropractic spinal manipulation and likelihood of tramadol prescription in adults with radicular low back pain: a retrospective cohort study using US data. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078105. [PMID: 38692725 PMCID: PMC11086504 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients receiving chiropractic spinal manipulation (CSM) for low back pain (LBP) are less likely to receive any opioid prescription for subsequent pain management. However, the likelihood of specifically being prescribed tramadol, a less potent opioid, has not been explored. We hypothesised that adults receiving CSM for newly diagnosed radicular LBP would be less likely to receive a tramadol prescription over 1-year follow-up, compared with those receiving usual medical care. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING US medical records-based dataset including >115 million patients attending academic health centres (TriNetX, Inc), queried 9 November 2023. PARTICIPANTS Opioid-naive adults aged 18-50 with a new diagnosis of radicular LBP were included. Patients with serious pathology and tramadol use contraindications were excluded. Variables associated with tramadol prescription were controlled via propensity matching. INTERVENTIONS Patients were divided into two cohorts dependent on treatment received on the index date of radicular LBP diagnosis (CSM or usual medical care). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Risk ratio (RR) for tramadol prescription (primary); markers of usual medical care utilisation (secondary). RESULTS After propensity matching, there were 1171 patients per cohort (mean age 35 years). Tramadol prescription was significantly lower in the CSM cohort compared with the usual medical care cohort, with an RR (95% CI) of 0.32 (0.18 to 0.57; p<0.0001). A cumulative incidence graph demonstrated that the reduced incidence of tramadol prescription in the CSM cohort relative to the usual medical care cohort was maintained throughout 1-year follow-up. Utilisation of NSAIDs, physical therapy evaluation and lumbar imaging was similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS This study found that US adults initially receiving CSM for radicular LBP had a reduced likelihood of receiving a tramadol prescription over 1-year follow-up. These findings should be corroborated by a prospective study to minimise residual confounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert James Trager
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Clinical Research Training Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary A Cupler
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitative Services, Butler VA Health Care System, Butler, Pennsylvania, USA
- Institute for Clinical Research Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roshini Srinivasan
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Regina M Casselberry
- Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jaime A Perez
- Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jeffery A Dusek
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kelly JM, Coppieters MW, Kluver J, Deen M, Rio E, Harvie DS. "It made you feel like you've still got it": experiences of people with chronic low back pain undertaking a single session of body image training in virtual reality. Physiother Theory Pract 2023; 39:2651-2661. [PMID: 35861952 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2095313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Embodying fit avatars in virtual reality (VR) is proposed as a possible treatment for cortical body representations and pain-related self-perceptions. OBJECTIVE To explore consumer perceptions of a novel VR intervention (VR-BiT) for chronic low back pain. METHODS Adults (n = 17, mean age(SD) = 52(14)) with chronic low back pain who had undergone a single session of VR-BiT as part of a randomized controlled trial underwent a semi-structured interview using open-ended questions. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS Data reduction identified four themes: clinically beneficial and beyond; helping and hindering use; desire for more; and individualized future. Participants experienced wide ranging effects, including improved physical self-efficacy, pain, ability to perform physical activity and psychological symptoms. The intervention was well tolerated, except for two reports of nausea, and a few participants indicating pain associated with unaccustomed movement. Most participants were motivated to use VR-BiT again, despite some having technical issues. Participants suggested that personalizing VR-BiT and regular use would be beneficial. CONCLUSIONS There was strong consumer support for further use of VR-BiT. Future studies of VR-BiT effectiveness are warranted and should consider incorporating individual user preferences, including people with diverse pain presentations, and involving a multi-session design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan M Kelly
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane & Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Michel W Coppieters
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane & Gold Coast, Australia
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph Kluver
- Metro South Pain Rehabilitation Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Michael Deen
- Metro South Pain Rehabilitation Centre, Division of Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Ebonie Rio
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
- The Victorian Institute of Sport, Albert Park, Australia
| | - Daniel S Harvie
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane & Gold Coast, Australia
- Innovation, Implementation and Clinical Translation in Health (IIMPACT in Health), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Tce, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tieppo Francio V, Westerhaus BD, Carayannopoulos AG, Sayed D. Multifidus dysfunction and restorative neurostimulation: a scoping review. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2023; 24:1341-1354. [PMID: 37439698 PMCID: PMC10690869 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is multifactorial in nature, with recent research highlighting the role of multifidus dysfunction in a subset of nonspecific CLBP. This review aimed to provide a foundational reference that elucidates the pathophysiological cascade of multifidus dysfunction, how it contrasts with other CLBP etiologies and the role of restorative neurostimulation. METHODS A scoping review of the literature. RESULTS In total, 194 articles were included, and findings were presented to highlight emerging principles related to multifidus dysfunction and restorative neurostimulation. Multifidus dysfunction is diagnosed by a history of mechanical, axial, nociceptive CLBP and exam demonstrating functional lumbar instability, which differs from other structural etiologies. Diagnostic images may be used to grade multifidus atrophy and assess other structural pathologies. While various treatments exist for CLBP, restorative neurostimulation distinguishes itself from traditional neurostimulation in a way that treats a different etiology, targets a different anatomical site, and has a distinctive mechanism of action. CONCLUSIONS Multifidus dysfunction has been proposed to result from loss of neuromuscular control, which may manifest clinically as muscle inhibition resulting in altered movement patterns. Over time, this cycle may result in potential atrophy, degeneration and CLBP. Restorative neurostimulation, a novel implantable neurostimulator system, stimulates the efferent lumbar medial branch nerve to elicit repetitive multifidus contractions. This intervention aims to interrupt the cycle of dysfunction and normalize multifidus activity incrementally, potentially restoring neuromuscular control. Restorative neurostimulation has been shown to reduce pain and disability in CLBP, improve quality of life and reduce health care expenditures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States
| | - Benjamin D Westerhaus
- Cantor Spine Institute at the Paley Orthopedic & Spine Institute, West Palm Beach, FL 33407, United States
| | - Alexios G Carayannopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, United States
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lapin B, Li Y, Davin S, Stilphen M, Johnson JK, Benzel E, Habboub G, Katzan IL. Comparison of stratification techniques for optimal management of patients with chronic low back pain in spine clinics. Spine J 2023; 23:1334-1344. [PMID: 37149152 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Identifying optimal stratification techniques for subgrouping patients with low back pain (LBP) into treatment groups for the purpose of identifying optimal management and improving clinical outcomes is an important area for further research. PURPOSE Our study aimed to compare performance of the STarT Back Tool (SBT) and 3 stratification techniques involving PROMIS domain scores for use in patients presenting to a spine clinic for chronic LBP. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Adult patients with chronic LBP seen in a spine center between November 14, 2018 and May 14, 2019 who completed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as part of routine care, and were followed up with completed PROs 1 year later. OUTCOME MEASURES Four stratification techniques, including SBT, and 3 PROMIS-based techniques: the NIH Task Force recommended Impact Stratification Score (ISS), symptom clusters based on latent class analysis (LCA), and SPADE symptom clusters. METHODS The 4 stratification techniques were compared according to criterion validity, construct validity, and prognostic utility. For criterion validity, overlap in characterization of mild, moderate, and severe subgroups were compared to SBT, which was considered the gold standard, using quadratic weighted kappa statistic. Construct validity compared techniques' ability to differentiate across disability groups defined by modified Oswestry LBP Disability Questionnaire (MDQ), median days in the past month unable to complete activities of daily living (ADLs), and worker's compensation using standardized mean differences (SMD). Prognostic utility was compared based on the techniques' ability to predict long-term improvement in outcomes, defined as improvement in global health and MDQ at 1-year. RESULTS There were 2,246 adult patients with chronic LBP included in our study (mean age 61.0 [SD 14.0], 55.0% female, 83.4% white). All stratification techniques resulted in roughly a third of patients grouped into mild, moderate, and severe categories, with ISS and LCA demonstrating substantial agreement with SBT, while SPADE had moderate agreement. Construct validity was met for all techniques, with large effects demonstrated between mild and severe categories for differentiating MDQ, ADLs, and worker's compensation disability groups (SMD range 0.57-2.48). All stratification techniques demonstrated ability to detect improvement by 1-year, with severe groups experiencing the greatest improvement in multivariable logistic regression models. CONCLUSIONS All 4 stratification techniques demonstrated validity and prognostic utility for subgrouping patients with chronic LBP based on risk of long-term disability. ISS and LCA symptom clusters may be the optimal methods given the improved feasibility of including only a few relevant PROMIS domains. Future research should investigate multidisciplinary treatment approaches to target mild, moderate, and severe patients based on these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Lapin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Yadi Li
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Sara Davin
- Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Mary Stilphen
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Therapy, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Joshua K Johnson
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Therapy, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Edward Benzel
- Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Ghaith Habboub
- Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Irene L Katzan
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quirk DA, Johnson ME, Anderson DE, Smuck M, Sun R, Matthew R, Bailey J, Marras WS, Bell KM, Darwin J, Bowden AE. Biomechanical Phenotyping of Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol for BACPAC. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2023; 24:S48-S60. [PMID: 36315101 PMCID: PMC10403313 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Biomechanics represents the common final output through which all biopsychosocial constructs of back pain must pass, making it a rich target for phenotyping. To exploit this feature, several sites within the NIH Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) have developed biomechanics measurement and phenotyping tools. The overall aims of this article were to: 1) provide a narrative review of biomechanics as a phenotyping tool; 2) describe the diverse array of tools and outcome measures that exist within BACPAC; and 3) highlight how leveraging these technologies with the other data collected within BACPAC could elucidate the relationship between biomechanics and other metrics used to characterize low back pain (LBP). METHODS The narrative review highlights how biomechanical outcomes can discriminate between those with and without LBP, as well as among levels of severity of LBP. It also addresses how biomechanical outcomes track with functional improvements in LBP. Additionally, we present the clinical use case for biomechanical outcome measures that can be met via emerging technologies. RESULTS To answer the need for measuring biomechanical performance, our "Results" section describes the spectrum of technologies that have been developed and are being used within BACPAC. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS The outcome measures collected by these technologies will be an integral part of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies conducted in BACPAC. Linking these measures with other biopsychosocial data collected within BACPAC increases our potential to use biomechanics as a tool for understanding the mechanisms of LBP, phenotyping unique LBP subgroups, and matching these individuals with an appropriate treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Adam Quirk
- Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Marit E Johnson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Dennis E Anderson
- Center for Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew Smuck
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ruopeng Sun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Robert Matthew
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jeannie Bailey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - William S Marras
- Department of Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Kevin M Bell
- Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessa Darwin
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anton E Bowden
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trager RJ, Cupler ZA, Srinivasan R, Casselberry RM, Perez JA, Dusek JA. Association between chiropractic spinal manipulation and gabapentin prescription in adults with radicular low back pain: retrospective cohort study using US data. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073258. [PMID: 37479505 PMCID: PMC10364168 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Radicular low back pain (rLBP) is often treated off-label with gabapentin or by chiropractors using chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT). To date, no studies have examined the association between these interventions. We hypothesised that adults under 50 years of age receiving CSMT for newly diagnosed rLBP would have reduced odds of receiving a gabapentin prescription over 1 year-follow-up. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING US network including linked medical records, medical claims and pharmacy claims of >122 million patients attending large healthcare organisations (TriNetX), queried 15 June 2023, yielding data from 2017 to 2023. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 18-49 were included at their first occurrence of rLBP diagnosis. Exclusions were severe pathology, other spinal conditions, on-label gabapentin indications and gabapentin contraindications. Propensity score matching controlled for variables associated with gabapentin use and receipt of prescription medication over the preceding year. INTERVENTIONS Patients were divided into CSMT or usual medical care cohorts based on the care received on the index date of rLBP diagnosis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES OR for gabapentin prescription. RESULTS After propensity matching, there were 1635 patients per cohort (mean age 36.3±8.6 years, 60% women). Gabapentin prescription over 1-year follow-up was significantly lower in the CSMT cohort compared with the usual medical care cohort, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.53 (0.40 to 0.71; p<0.0001). Sensitivity analyses revealed early divergence in cumulative incidence of prescription; and no significant between-cohort difference in a negative control outcome (gastrointestinal medication) suggesting adequate control for pharmacological care preference. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that US adults receiving CSMT for newly diagnosed rLBP have significantly reduced odds of receiving a gabapentin prescription over 1-year follow-up compared with those receiving usual medical care. Results may not be generalisable and should be replicated in other healthcare settings and corroborated by a prospective study to reduce confounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Trager
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- College of Chiropractic, Logan University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Zachary A Cupler
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitative Services, Butler VA Health Care System, Butler, Pennsylvania, USA
- Institute for Clinical Research Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roshini Srinivasan
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Regina M Casselberry
- Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jaime A Perez
- Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jeffery A Dusek
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gleadhill C, Dooley K, Kamper SJ, Manvell N, Corrigan M, Cashin A, Birchill N, Donald B, Leyland M, Delbridge A, Barnett C, Renfrew D, Lamond S, Boettcher CE, Chambers L, Maude T, Davis J, Hodgson S, Makaroff A, Wallace JB, Kotrick K, Mullen N, Gallagher R, Zelinski S, Watson T, Davidson S, Viana Da Silva P, Mahon B, Delore C, Manvell J, Gibbs B, Hook C, Stoddard C, Meers E, Byrne M, Schneider T, Bolsewicz K, Williams CM. What does high value care for musculoskeletal conditions mean and how do you apply it in practice? A consensus statement from a research network of physiotherapists in New South Wales, Australia. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071489. [PMID: 37328182 PMCID: PMC10277099 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a physiotherapist-led consensus statement on the definition and provision of high-value care for people with musculoskeletal conditions. DESIGN We performed a three-stage study using Research And Development/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method methodology. We reviewed evidence about current definitions through a rapid literature review and then performed a survey and interviews with network members to gather consensus. Consensus was finalised in a face-to-face meeting. SETTING Australian primary care. PARTICIPANTS Registered physiotherapists who are members of a practice-based research network (n=31). RESULTS The rapid review revealed two definitions, four domains of high value care and seven themes of high-quality care. Online survey responses (n=26) and interviews (n=9) generated two additional high-quality care themes, a definition of low-value care, and 21 statements on the application of high value care. Consensus was reached for three working definitions (high value, high-quality and low value care), a final model of four high value care domains (high-quality care, patient values, cost-effectiveness, reducing waste), nine high-quality care themes and 15 statements on application. CONCLUSION High value care for musculoskeletal conditions delivers most value for the patient, and the clinical benefits outweigh the costs to the individual or system providing the care. High-quality care is evidence based, effective and safe care that is patient-centred, consistent, accountable, timely, equitable and allows easy interaction with healthcare providers and healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Gleadhill
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- New South Wales Regional Health Partners, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine Dooley
- School of Health Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven J Kamper
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Allied Health Department, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Manvell
- NUmoves Physiotherapy, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Aidan Cashin
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Noah Birchill
- Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bruce Donald
- John Hunter Hospital Physiotherapy, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Murray Leyland
- Thornton Physiotherapy, Maitland, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Delbridge
- Regent Street Physiotherapy, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - David Renfrew
- Newcastle Performance Physiotherapy, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven Lamond
- Newcastle Knights, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Craig Edward Boettcher
- Regent Street Physiotherapy, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lucia Chambers
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Travis Maude
- Advanced Physiotherapy, Warners Bay, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jon Davis
- PhysioStudio, Maitland, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephanie Hodgson
- Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Makaroff
- Employers Mutual Limited, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Kelly Kotrick
- Newcastle Performance Physiotherapy, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Ryan Gallagher
- Honeysuckle Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samuel Zelinski
- NUmoves Physiotherapy, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Toby Watson
- The Good Physio, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon Davidson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Priscilla Viana Da Silva
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Caitlin Delore
- Regent Street Physiotherapy, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joshua Manvell
- Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Chris Hook
- Advanced Physiotherapy, Warners Bay, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Stoddard
- Terrace Physio Plus, Raymond Terrace, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elliot Meers
- Kinetic Sports Physiotherapy, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Byrne
- Recovery Partners, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Katarzyna Bolsewicz
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher Michael Williams
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Mid North Coast Local Health District, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vila-Dieguez O, Heindel MD, Awokuse D, Kulig K, Michener LA. Exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy: Proposed mechanisms of recovery. Shoulder Elbow 2023; 15:233-249. [PMID: 37325389 PMCID: PMC10268139 DOI: 10.1177/17585732231172166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy is a common recurrent cause of shoulder pain, and resistance exercise is the first-line recommended intervention. Proposed causal mechanisms of resistance exercise for patients with RC tendinopathy consist of four domains: tendon structure, neuromuscular factors, pain and sensorimotor processing, and psychosocial factors. Tendon structure plays a role in RC tendinopathy, with decreased stiffness, increased thickness, and collagen disorganization. Neuromuscular performance deficits of altered kinematics, muscle activation, and force are present in RC tendinopathy, but advanced methods of assessing muscle performance are needed to fully assess these factors. Psychological factors of depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, treatment expectations, and self-efficacy are present and predict patient-reported outcomes. Central nervous system dysfunctions also exist, specifically altered pain and sensorimotor processing. Resisted exercise may normalize these factors, but limited evidence exists to explain the relationship of the four proposed domains to trajectory of recovery and defining persistent deficits limiting outcomes. Clinicians and researchers can use this model to understand how exercise mediates change in patient outcomes, develop subgroups to deliver patient-specific approach for treatment and define metrics to track recovery over time. Supporting evidence is limited, indicating the need for future studies characterizing mechanisms of recovery with exercise for RC tendinopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Vila-Dieguez
- Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew D. Heindel
- Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Awokuse
- Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kornelia Kulig
- Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lori A. Michener
- Division of Biokinesiology & Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fritz JM, Kongsted A. A new paradigm for musculoskeletal pain care: moving beyond structural impairments. Conclusion of a chiropractic and manual therapies thematic series. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:15. [PMID: 37264395 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00484-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
This commentary closes the thematic series "A new paradigm for musculoskeletal pain care: moving beyond structural impairments". The papers published in the series point to key aspects of shifting the paradigm of musculoskeletal care from clinician-led management often focused on addressing presumed structural anomalies to partnering with patients to find individual strategies that empower patients towards self-management. Several papers in the series highlighted the need for developing patient-centred models of care that respect individual patient's needs and preferences. Also, the series pointed to different options for modes of delivery including mHealth and the challenges and opportunities they present for developing person-centred strategies. For health care to provide effective support for people with musculoskeletal pain conditions, there is a need to recognise that contextual factors, including a strong patient-provider alliance, clearly play an important, perhaps primary, role. Health care professions dealing with musculoskeletal pain conditions should engage in research to investigate effective ways to move this understanding into practice including how to train providers. We hope the work collected in this series will stimulate further questions and more research as musculoskeletal pain providers seek to make their care more person-centred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training and Associate Dean for Research, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Senior Researcher, Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lapin B, Davin S, Stilphen M, Johnson JK, Benzel E, Habboub G, Katzan IL. Stratification of Spine Patients based on Self-Reported Clinical Symptom Classes: Evaluation of Long-Term Outcomes and Subsequent Interventions. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL (NASSJ) 2023; 14:100205. [PMID: 36970061 PMCID: PMC10031537 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Prior work by our group developed a stratification tool based on four PROMIS domains for patients with low back pain (LBP). Our study aimed to evaluate the ability of our previously developed symptom classes to predict long-term outcomes, and determine whether there were differential treatment effects by intervention. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with LBP seen in spine clinics in a large health system between November 14, 2018 and May 14, 2019 who completed patient-reported outcomes as part of routine care at baseline and again at 12-months follow-up. Latent class analysis identified symptom classes based on PROMIS domain scores (physical function, pain interference, social role satisfaction, and fatigue) that were ≥1 standard deviation worse (meaningfully worse) than the general population. The ability of the profiles to predict long-term outcomes at 12-months was evaluated through multivariable models. Differences in outcomes by subsequent treatments (physical therapy, specialist visits, injections, and surgery) were investigated. Results There were 3,236 adult patients (average age 61.1 ± 14.2, 55.4% female) included in the study with three distinct classes identified: mild symptoms (n = 986, 30.5%), mixed (n = 798, 24.7%) with poor scores on physical function and pain interference but better scores on other domains, and significant symptoms (n = 1,452, 44.9%). The classes were significantly associated with long-term outcomes, with patients with significant symptoms improving the most across all domains. Utilization differed across classes, with the mixed symptom class receiving more PT and injections and significant symptom class receiving more surgeries and specialist visits. Conclusions Patients with LBP have distinct clinical symptom classes which could be utilized to stratify patients into groups based on risk of future disability. These symptom classes can also be used to provide estimates of the effectiveness of different interventions, further increasing the clinical utility of these classes in standard care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Lapin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
- Corresponding author. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, JJ3-603, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Tel.: (216)-308-5259; fax: (216)-636-1040.
| | - Sara Davin
- Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Mary Stilphen
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Therapy, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Joshua K. Johnson
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Therapy, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
- Center for Value-Based Care Research, Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Edward Benzel
- Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Ghaith Habboub
- Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Irene L. Katzan
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pratscher SD, Sibille KT, Fillingim RB. Conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention in adults with chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:15. [PMID: 36694217 PMCID: PMC9872326 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01247-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is a major source of human suffering, and chronic low back pain (cLBP) is among the most prevalent, costly, and disabling of pain conditions. Due to the significant personal and societal burden and the complex and recurring nature of cLBP, self-management approaches that can be practiced at home are highly relevant to develop and test. The respiratory system is one of the most integrated systems of the body, and breathing is bidirectionally related with stress, emotion, and pain. Thus, the widespread physiological and psychological impact of breathing practices and breathwork interventions hold substantial promise as possible self-management strategies for chronic pain. The primary aim of the current randomized pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention compared to a sham control condition. METHODS The rationale and procedures for testing a 5-day conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention, compared to a deep breathing sham control intervention, in 24 adults (18-65 years) with cLBP is described. Both interventions will be delivered using standardized audio recordings and practiced over 5 days (two times in-person and three times at-home), and both are described as Breathing and Attention Training to reduce possible expectancy and placebo effects common in pain research. The primary outcomes for this study are feasibility and acceptability. Feasibility will be evaluated by determining rates of participant recruitment, adherence, retention, and study assessment completion, and acceptability will be evaluated by assessing participants' satisfaction and helpfulness of the intervention. We will also measure other clinical pain, psychological, behavioral, and physiological variables that are planned to be included in a follow-up randomized controlled trial. DISCUSSION This will be the first study to examine the effects of a conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention for individuals with chronic pain. The successful completion of this smaller-scale pilot study will provide data regarding the feasibility and acceptability to conduct a subsequent trial testing the efficacy of this breathing self-management practice for adults with cLBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04740710 . Registered on 5 February 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven D Pratscher
- Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Kimberly T Sibille
- Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Roger B Fillingim
- Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shen WC, Jan YK, Liau BY, Lin Q, Wang S, Tai CC, Lung CW. Effectiveness of self-management of dry and wet cupping therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32325. [PMID: 36595746 PMCID: PMC9794267 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) can significantly affect a person's quality of life. Cupping has been used to treat LBP. However, various cupping methods are typically included in evaluating the efficacy of cupping therapy. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the evidence from the literature regarding the effects of dry and wet cupping therapy on LBP in adults. Dry and wet cupping therapy are analyzed categorically in this study. METHODS We searched for randomized clinical trials with cupping in LBP published between 2008 and 2022. In dry or wet cupping clinical studies, pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale and present pain intensity, and the quality of life intensity was measured using the Oswestry disability index. RESULTS The 656 studies were identified, of which 10 studies for 690 patients with LBP were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant reduction in the pain intensity score with present pain intensity using wet cupping therapy (P < .01). In addition, both cupping therapy groups displayed significant Oswestry disability index score reduction compared to the control group (both P < .01). The patients with LBP have a substantial reduction by using wet cupping but have not shown a considerable decrease by using dry cupping (P = .19). In addition, only wet cupping therapy groups displayed a significantly improved quality of life compared to the control group. The study had a very high heterogeneity (I2 > 50%). It means there is no standardization in the treatment protocol in randomized clinical trials. In the meta-regression, there was statistically significant evidence that the number of treatment times and intercepts were related (P < .01). CONCLUSION The present meta-analysis shows that wet cupping therapy effectively reduces the pain intensity of LBP. Furthermore, both dry wet cupping therapy improved patients with LBP quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Cheng Shen
- Department of Digital Media Design, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Kuen Jan
- Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL
- Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL
- Computational Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL
| | - Ben-Yi Liau
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Quanxin Lin
- Department of Creative Product Design, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Song Wang
- Division of Chinese Medicine, Asia University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Cheng Tai
- International Ph.D. Program for Cell Therapy and Regeneration Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lung
- Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL
- Department of Creative Product Design, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
- * Correspondence: Chi-Wen Lung, Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tonelli Enrico V, Schneider M, Haas M, Vo N, Huang W, McFarland C, Weber N, Sowa G. The association of biomarkers with pain and function in acute and subacute low back pain: a secondary analysis of an RCT. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:1059. [PMID: 36471334 PMCID: PMC9721012 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06027-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition and a major cause of disability worldwide. Previous studies have found associations of biomarkers with pain and pain-related disability in LBP patients. This study aimed to explore the association between serum biomarkers and pain and disability in patients with acute or subacute axial LBP. METHODS This study was ancillary to a parent randomized controlled trial. Enrolled participants were randomized into three intervention groups: one of two types of spinal manipulation or medical care. In the parent study, 107 adults who experienced a new episode of LBP within 3 months prior to enrollment were recruited. For this study, 90 of these 107 participants consented to have blood samples obtained, which were drawn immediately before the beginning of treatment. Seven biomarkers were chosen based on previous literature and analyzed. Clinical outcomes were pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) evaluated at baseline and 4 weeks. Spearman's |r| was used to study the association of initial levels of each biomarker with pain and ODI scores at baseline and with changes in outcome scores from baseline to 4 weeks (end of treatment) within each intervention group. RESULTS At baseline, 4 of 7 biomarkers had an association with pain that was |r| ≥ .20: neuropeptide Y (NPY) (r = 0.23, p = .028), E-Selectin (r = 0.22, p = .043), vitamin D ((r = - 0.32, p = .002), and c-reactive protein (CRP) (r = 0.37, p = .001). No baseline biomarker had an association with disability that was |r| ≥ 0.20. For the correlations of baseline biomarkers with 4-week change in outcomes, vitamin D showed a correlation with change in disability and/or pain (|r| ≥ 0.20, p > .05) in manipulation-related groups, while CRP, NPY, and E-selectin along with TNFα, Substance P and RANTES showed at least one correlation with change in pain or disability (|r| ≥ 0.20, p > .05) in at least one of the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS In 90 LBP patients, the analyzed biomarkers, especially vitamin D, represent a small set of potential candidates for further research aimed at individualizing patient care. Overall, the associations investigated in the current study are an initial step in identifying the direct mechanisms of LBP and predicting outcomes of manipulation-related treatments or medical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01211613, Date of Registration: September 29, 2010, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01211613?term=schneider&cond=Low+Back+Pain&cntry=US&state=US%3APA&draw=2&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Tonelli Enrico
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Ferguson Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Spine Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop Street, Room E1612, BST, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA ,grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, 100 Technology Dr, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
| | - Michael Schneider
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, 100 Technology Dr, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA ,grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Forbes Tower, Suite 7057, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
| | - Mitchell Haas
- grid.17635.360000000419368657Integrative Health & Wellbeing Program, University of Minnesota, MMC 505; 420 Delaware Street S.E, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
| | - Nam Vo
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Ferguson Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Spine Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop Street, Room E1612, BST, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
| | - Wan Huang
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 910; 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
| | - Christine McFarland
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, 100 Technology Dr, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
| | - Nick Weber
- grid.280535.90000 0004 0388 0584Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, 355 E Erie St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA ,grid.16753.360000 0001 2299 3507Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 710 N Lake Shore Dr #1022, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| | - Gwendolyn Sowa
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Ferguson Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Spine Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop Street, Room E1612, BST, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA ,grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 910; 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ray BM, Kovaleski A, Kelleran KJ, Stilwell P, Baraki A, Coninx S, Eubanks JE. An exploration of low back pain beliefs in a Northern America based general population. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 61:102591. [PMID: 35777261 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior research has demonstrated that people across different populations hold beliefs about low back pain (LBP) that are inconsistent with current evidence. Qualitative research is needed to explore current LBP beliefs in Northern America (NA). OBJECTIVES We conducted a primarily qualitative cross-sectional online survey to assess LBP beliefs in a NA population (USA and Canada). METHODS Participants were recruited online using social media advertisements targeting individuals in NA over the age of 18 with English speaking and reading comprehension. Participants answered questions regarding the cause of LBP, reasons for reoccurrence or persistence of LBP, and sources of these beliefs. Responses were analyzed using conventional (inductive) content analysis. RESULTS/FINDINGS 62 participants were included with a mean age of 47.6 years. Most participants reported multiple causes for LBP as well as its persistence and reoccurrence, however, these were biomedically focused with minimal to no regard for psychological or environmental influences. The primary cited source of participants' beliefs was healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS Our findings align with prior research from other regions, demonstrating a need for updating clinical education and public messaging about the biopsychosocial nature of LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Michael Ray
- Department of Health and Human Sciences, Bridgewater College, Bridgewater, VA, USA.
| | | | - Kyle J Kelleran
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Peter Stilwell
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, QC, USA
| | - Austin Baraki
- Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sabrina Coninx
- Institute for Philosophy II, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, DE, Germany
| | - James E Eubanks
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Garcia AN, Simon CB, Yang ZL, Niedzwiecki D, Cook CE, Gottfried O. Classification of older adults who underwent lumbar-related surgery using pre-operative biopsychosocial predictors and relationships with surgical recovery: An observational study conducted in the United States. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e1570-e1584. [PMID: 34587349 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Lumbar surgery is a commonly prescribed intervention for low back pain but poses higher risks and worse outcomes for older adults. Identifying clinical phenotypes based on biopsychosocial factors may help identify older adults who are at greatest risk for poor postoperative recovery. This study aimed to (a) classify older adults who underwent lumbar surgery based on preoperative biopsychosocial factors, and (b) quantify the association between preoperative biopsychosocial classifications and 3 and 12 months postoperative improvement outcomes. Latent class analysis was used to identify biopsychosocial classifications in 10,283 individuals aged ≥60 from the Quality Outcomes Database (the United States, 2021-2018). Logistic regression models measured the association between biopsychosocial classifications and 3 and 12 months postoperative outcomes (back/leg pain intensity, disability and quality of life), adjusting for covariates. Three classes were identified based on 19 a priori biopsychosocial factors and were characterised as 'high-risk' (15%), 'physical-/social health-risk' (44%) and 'low-risk' (41%). The high-risk class demonstrated increased odds of failing to recover post-operatively compared to the other classes. Similarly, the physical-/social-risk class demonstrated increased odds of failing to recover in all outcomes and time points compared to the low-risk class. Biopsychosocial factors with higher prevalence in the high versus low-risk class were depression (92.5% vs. 10.6%), multiple morbidities (55.3% vs. 25.7%) and obesity (59.5% vs. 37.2%). This study introduces novel non-recovery phenotypes for older adults undergoing lumbar surgery and may lead to the development of tailored interventions to improve clinical care and outcomes for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra N Garcia
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Lillington, North Carolina, USA
| | - Corey B Simon
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Division, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zidanyue Lexie Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chad E Cook
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Division, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Oren Gottfried
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stratification of spine patients based on self-reported clinical symptom classes. Spine J 2022; 22:1131-1138. [PMID: 35189348 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Improving prognostic stratification for patients with low back pain (LBP) outside of a primary care setting has been identified as an important area for further research. PURPOSE Our study aimed to identify clinical symptom classes of patients presenting to a spine clinic based on 4 Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains and evaluate demographic and clinical differences across classes. STUDY DESIGN An observational cross-sectional study of patients seen in spine centers at a large health system. PATIENT SAMPLE Adult patients with LBP seen in a spine center between November 14, 2018 and May 14, 2019 who completed patient-reported outcomes as part of routine care. OUTCOME MEASURES PROMIS physical function, pain interference, satisfaction with social roles and activities, and fatigue. METHODS Latent class analysis identified symptom classes based on PROMIS domain scores ≥1 standard deviation worse (meaningfully worse) than the general population. A multivariable multinomial logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate differences in symptom classes based on demographics and socioeconomic characteristics. Lastly, the ability of the profiles to discriminate across levels of disability, based on the modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI), was evaluated. RESULTS There were 7,144 adult patients included in the study who visited spine clinics for a primary complaint of LBP and completed all 4 PROMIS domains (age 58.7±15.9, 54% female). Three distinct classes were identified. Class 1 ("Significant Symptoms," n=3238) had PROMIS scores that were meaningfully worse than the population average for all domains. Class 2 ("Mixed Symptoms," n=1366) had meaningfully worse scores on physical function and pain interference but average scores on other domains. Class 3 ("Mild Symptoms," n=2540) had average scores across all domains. Compared to patients in Class 3, those in Class 2 were more likely older, and those in Classes 1 and 2 were more likely to be divorced, have lower household income, and no employment. Level of disability was significantly different across each class (average (SD) ODI for Classes 1-3: 53.4 (14.3), 39.9 (12.5), 22.9 (12.1), p<.01). CONCLUSIONS Patients presenting to specialty clinics for LBP demonstrate distinct clinical symptom classes which could be utilized to inform specific symptom-based treatment. Future research should evaluate the ability of these classes to predict long-term disability.
Collapse
|
17
|
George SZ, Fritz JM, Silfies SP, Schneider MJ, Beneciuk JM, Lentz TA, Gilliam JR, Hendren S, Norman KS. Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021; 51:CPG1-CPG60. [PMID: 34719942 PMCID: PMC10508241 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) remains a musculoskeletal condition with an adverse societal impact. Globally, LBP is highly prevalent and a leading cause of disability. This is an update to the 2012 Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy (AOPT), formerly the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), clinical practice guideline (CPG) for LBP. The overall objective of this update was to provide recommendations on interventions delivered by physical therapists or studied in care settings that included physical therapy providers. It also focused on synthesizing new evidence, with the purpose of making recommendations for specific nonpharmacologic treatments. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(11):CPG1-CPG60. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0304.
Collapse
|
18
|
Back and neck pain: in support of routine delivery of non-pharmacologic treatments as a way to improve individual and population health. Transl Res 2021; 234:129-140. [PMID: 33901699 PMCID: PMC8340679 DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Chronic back and neck pain are highly prevalent conditions that are among the largest drivers of physical disability and cost in the world. Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend use of non-pharmacologic treatments to decrease pain and improve physical function for individuals with back and neck pain. However, delivery of these treatments remains a challenge because common care delivery models for back and neck pain incentivize treatments that are not in the best interests of patients, the overall health system, or society. This narrative review focuses on the need to increase use of non-pharmacologic treatment as part of routine care for back and neck pain. First, we present the evidence base and summarize recommendations from clinical practice guidelines regarding non-pharmacologic treatments. Second, we characterize current use patterns for non-pharmacologic treatments and identify potential barriers to their delivery. Addressing these barriers will require coordinated efforts from multiple stakeholders to prioritize evidence-based non-pharmacologic treatment approaches over low value care for back and neck pain. These stakeholders include patients, health care providers, health care organizations, administrators, payers, policymakers and researchers.
Collapse
|
19
|
Briggs AM, Huckel Schneider C, Slater H, Jordan JE, Parambath S, Young JJ, Sharma S, Kopansky-Giles D, Mishrra S, Akesson KE, Ali N, Belton J, Betteridge N, Blyth FM, Brown R, Debere D, Dreinhöfer KE, Finucane L, Foster HE, Gimigliano F, Haldeman S, Haq SA, Horgan B, Jain A, Joshipura M, Kalla AA, Lothe J, Matsuda S, Mobasheri A, Mwaniki L, Nordin MC, Pattison M, Reis FJJ, Soriano ER, Tick H, Waddell J, Wiek D, Woolf AD, March L. Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e006045. [PMID: 37904582 PMCID: PMC8215245 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the profound burden of disease, a strategic global response to optimise musculoskeletal (MSK) health and guide national-level health systems strengthening priorities remains absent. Auspiced by the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health (G-MUSC), we aimed to empirically derive requisite priorities and components of a strategic response to guide global and national-level action on MSK health. METHODS Design: mixed-methods, three-phase design.Phase 1: qualitative study with international key informants (KIs), including patient representatives and people with lived experience. KIs characterised the contemporary landscape for MSK health and priorities for a global strategic response.Phase 2: scoping review of national health policies to identify contemporary MSK policy trends and foci.Phase 3: informed by phases 1-2, was a global eDelphi where multisectoral panellists rated and iterated a framework of priorities and detailed components/actions. RESULTS Phase 1: 31 KIs representing 25 organisations were sampled from 20 countries (40% low and middle income (LMIC)). Inductively derived themes were used to construct a logic model to underpin latter phases, consisting of five guiding principles, eight strategic priority areas and seven accelerators for action.Phase 2: of the 165 documents identified, 41 (24.8%) from 22 countries (88% high-income countries) and 2 regions met the inclusion criteria. Eight overarching policy themes, supported by 47 subthemes, were derived, aligning closely with the logic model.Phase 3: 674 panellists from 72 countries (46% LMICs) participated in round 1 and 439 (65%) in round 2 of the eDelphi. Fifty-nine components were retained with 10 (17%) identified as essential for health systems. 97.6% and 94.8% agreed or strongly agreed the framework was valuable and credible, respectively, for health systems strengthening. CONCLUSION An empirically derived framework, co-designed and strongly supported by multisectoral stakeholders, can now be used as a blueprint for global and country-level responses to improve MSK health and prioritise system strengthening initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Carmen Huckel Schneider
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Sarika Parambath
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James J Young
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Saurab Sharma
- Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal
| | - Deborah Kopansky-Giles
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Swatee Mishrra
- Sydney Musculoskeletal, Bone and Joint Health Alliance. Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristina E Akesson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nuzhat Ali
- Health Improvement, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Joletta Belton
- Global Alliance of Partners for Pain Advocacy, International Association for the Study of Pain, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Fiona M Blyth
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Brown
- World Federation of Chiropractic, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Demelash Debere
- Rehabilitation International (Africa Region), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Karsten E Dreinhöfer
- Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Finucane
- International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists Incorporated (IFOMPT), World Physiotherapy, London, UK
- Sussex MSK Partnership, Physiotherapy Department, National Health Service, Brighton, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Population Health Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Scott Haldeman
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California, USA
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- World Spine Care, Santa Ana, California, USA
| | - Syed A Haq
- Rheumatology Department, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Ben Horgan
- Consumer and Community Involvement Program, West Australian Health Translation Network, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anil Jain
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, Jaipur, India
| | | | - Asgar A Kalla
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jakob Lothe
- Norwegian Council for Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Shuichi Matsuda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ali Mobasheri
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Departments of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Joint Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Margareta C Nordin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Environmental Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York City, NY, USA
- Department of Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Marilyn Pattison
- World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT), London, UK
- MPOT/Access Fitness and Talking Matters, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Felipe J J Reis
- Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Clinical Medicine Department, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Enrique R Soriano
- Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Services and University Institute, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Heather Tick
- Department of Family Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Academic Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health, New Buffalo, Michigan, USA
| | - James Waddell
- Saint Michael's Hospital Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dieter Wiek
- People with Arthritis and Rheumatism, European Alliance for Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), Kilchberg, Switzerland
| | - Anthony D Woolf
- Bone and Joint Research Group, Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Lyn March
- Sydney Musculoskeletal, Bone and Joint Health Alliance. Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Briggs AM, Jordan JE, Kopansky-Giles D, Sharma S, March L, Schneider CH, Mishrra S, Young JJ, Slater H. The need for adaptable global guidance in health systems strengthening for musculoskeletal health: a qualitative study of international key informants. Glob Health Res Policy 2021; 6:24. [PMID: 34256865 PMCID: PMC8277526 DOI: 10.1186/s41256-021-00201-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, MSK pain and MSK injury/trauma are the largest contributors to the global burden of disability, yet global guidance to arrest the rising disability burden is lacking. We aimed to explore contemporary context, challenges and opportunities at a global level and relevant to health systems strengthening for MSK health, as identified by international key informants (KIs) to inform a global MSK health strategic response. METHODS An in-depth qualitative study was undertaken with international KIs, purposively sampled across high-income and low and middle-income countries (LMICs). KIs identified as representatives of peak global and international organisations (clinical/professional, advocacy, national government and the World Health Organization), thought leaders, and people with lived experience in advocacy roles. Verbatim transcripts of individual semi-structured interviews were analysed inductively using a grounded theory method. Data were organised into categories describing 1) contemporary context; 2) goals; 3) guiding principles; 4) accelerators for action; and 5) strategic priority areas (pillars), to build a data-driven logic model. Here, we report on categories 1-4 of the logic model. RESULTS Thirty-one KIs from 20 countries (40% LMICs) affiliated with 25 organisations participated. Six themes described contemporary context (category 1): 1) MSK health is afforded relatively lower priority status compared with other health conditions and is poorly legitimised; 2) improving MSK health is more than just healthcare; 3) global guidance for country-level system strengthening is needed; 4) impact of COVID-19 on MSK health; 5) multiple inequities associated with MSK health; and 6) complexity in health service delivery for MSK health. Five guiding principles (category 3) focussed on adaptability; inclusiveness through co-design; prevention and reducing disability; a lifecourse approach; and equity and value-based care. Goals (category 2) and seven accelerators for action (category 4) were also derived. CONCLUSION KIs strongly supported the creation of an adaptable global strategy to catalyse and steward country-level health systems strengthening responses for MSK health. The data-driven logic model provides a blueprint for global agencies and countries to initiate appropriate whole-of-health system reforms to improve population-level prevention and management of MSK health. Contextual considerations about MSK health and accelerators for action should be considered in reform activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Briggs
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
| | | | - Deborah Kopansky-Giles
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Saurab Sharma
- Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal
| | - Lyn March
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Musculoskeletal, Bone & Joint Health Alliance, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carmen Huckel Schneider
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Swatee Mishrra
- Sydney Musculoskeletal, Bone & Joint Health Alliance, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - James J Young
- Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helen Slater
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Longtin C, Décary S, Cook CE, Tousignant-Laflamme Y. What does it take to facilitate the integration of clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain into practice? Part 1: A synthesis of recommendation. Pain Pract 2021; 21:943-954. [PMID: 33998769 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the emergence of multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the rehabilitation of low back pain (LBP) over the last decade, self-reported levels of disability in this population have not improved. This may be explained by the numerous implementation barriers, such as the complexity of information and sheer volumes of CPGs. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to summarize the evidence and recommendations from the most recent and high-quality CPGs on the rehabilitation management of LBP by developing an infographic summarizing the recommendations to facilitate dissemination into clinical practice. METHODS We performed a systematic review of high-quality CPGs with an emphasis on rehabilitation approaches. We searched major health-related research databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, and PEDro). We performed quality assessment via the AGREE-II instrument. Contents of the CPGs were synthesized by extracting recommendations, which were then compared to one another to identify consistencies based on an iterative evaluation process. RESULTS We identified and assessed 5 recent high-quality CPGs. We synthesized 13 recommendations on the rehabilitation management of LBP (2 for screening procedures, 3 for assessment procedures, and 8 involving treatment approaches) and 2 underlying principles were highlighted. These results were then synthetized and illustrated in a concise infographic that serves as a conceptual roadmap that identifies the specific behavior changes (i.e., adoption of CPGs' recommendations) rehabilitation professionals should adopt in order to integrate an evidenced-based approach for the management of LBP. CONCLUSIONS We systematically reviewed the literature for CPGs' recommendations for the physical rehabilitation management of LBP and synthesized the information through an infographic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Longtin
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Chad E Cook
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Shebrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.,Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stevans JM, Delitto A, Khoja SS, Patterson CG, Smith CN, Schneider MJ, Freburger JK, Greco CM, Freel JA, Sowa GA, Wasan AD, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ, Minick KI, Wegener ST, Ephraim PL, Friedman M, Beneciuk JM, George SZ, Saper RB. Risk Factors Associated With Transition From Acute to Chronic Low Back Pain in US Patients Seeking Primary Care. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2037371. [PMID: 33591367 PMCID: PMC7887659 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Acute low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent, with a presumed favorable prognosis; however, once chronic, LBP becomes a disabling and expensive condition. Acute to chronic LBP transition rates vary widely owing to absence of standardized operational definitions, and it is unknown whether a standardized prognostic tool (ie, Subgroups for Targeted Treatment Back tool [SBT]) can estimate this transition or whether early non-guideline concordant treatment is associated with the transition to chronic LBP. OBJECTIVE To assess the associations between the transition from acute to chronic LBP with SBT risk strata; demographic, clinical, and practice characteristics; and guideline nonconcordant processes of care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This inception cohort study was conducted alongside a multisite, pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Adult patients with acute LBP stratified by SBT risk were enrolled in 77 primary care practices in 4 regions across the United States between May 2016 and June 2018 and followed up for 6 months, with final follow-up completed by March 2019. Data analysis was conducted from January to March 2020. EXPOSURES SBT risk strata and early LBP guideline nonconcordant processes of care (eg, receipt of opioids, imaging, and subspecialty referral). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Transition from acute to chronic LBP at 6 months using the National Institutes of Health Task Force on Research Standards consensus definition of chronic LBP. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical factors, and LBP process of care were obtained via electronic medical records. RESULTS Overall, 5233 patients with acute LBP (3029 [58%] women; 4353 [83%] White individuals; mean [SD] age 50.6 [16.9] years; 1788 [34%] low risk; 2152 [41%] medium risk; and 1293 [25%] high risk) were included. Overall transition rate to chronic LBP at six months was 32% (1666 patients). In a multivariable model, SBT risk stratum was positively associated with transition to chronic LBP (eg, high-risk vs low-risk groups: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.45; 95% CI, 2.00-2.98; P < .001). Patient and clinical characteristics associated with transition to chronic LBP included obesity (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.28-1.80; P < .001); smoking (aOR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.29-1.89; P < .001); severe and very severe baseline disability (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.48-2.24; P < .001 and aOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.60-2.68; P < .001, respectively) and diagnosed depression/anxiety (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28-2.15; P < .001). After controlling for all other variables, patients exposed to 1, 2, or 3 nonconcordant processes of care within the first 21 days were 1.39 (95% CI, 1.21-2.32), 1.88 (95% CI, 1.53-2.32), and 2.16 (95% CI, 1.10-4.25) times more likely to develop chronic LBP compared with those with no exposure (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, the transition rate to chronic LBP was substantial and increased correspondingly with SBT stratum and early exposure to guideline nonconcordant care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel M. Stevans
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anthony Delitto
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samannaaz S. Khoja
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Charity G. Patterson
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Clair N. Smith
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael J. Schneider
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Janet K. Freburger
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Carol M. Greco
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer A. Freel
- Physician Network and Quality, St Clair Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Gwendolyn A. Sowa
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ajay D. Wasan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Kate I. Minick
- Intermountain Healthcare Rehabilitation Services, Murray, Utah
| | | | - Patti L. Ephraim
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Jason M. Beneciuk
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville
| | - Steven Z. George
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert B. Saper
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
|