Use of proton pump inhibitors and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Cirrhosis: Pharmacokinetics, Benefits and Drawbacks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the pharmacokinetics, benefits, and risks of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in cirrhotic patients, focusing on the appropriateness of their use and potential adverse effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies highlight significant pharmacokinetic alterations in PPIs among cirrhotic patients, with marked increases in lansoprazole and pantoprazole exposure and relatively stable levels of esomeprazole. While effective for managing acid-related disorders and post-band ulcer rebleeding, evidence supporting PPI use for portal hypertension-related bleeding is lacking. Emerging research suggests potential adverse effects such as hepatic decompensation, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, and increased mortality, possibly linked to dysbiosis and bacterial translocation. PPI use in cirrhotic patients alters pharmacokinetics significantly, with esomeprazole potentially safer in advanced cirrhosis. The review advises caution in routine PPI use beyond acid-related conditions due to limited evidence and substantial risks. It underscores the need for careful risk-benefit assessments and exploration of alternative therapies. Future research should aim to identify safer management strategies for portal hypertension complications and to develop evidence-based guidelines for PPI use in patients with cirrhosis.

The association between proton-pump inhibitor use and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The association between long-term proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) use and malignancies had long been discussed, but it still lacks consensus. Our study investigated the association between PPI use and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence following curative surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 6037 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy. Patients were divided into four groups according to their PPI usage. (non-users: < 28 cumulative defined daily dose [cDDD]; short-term users: 28-89 cDDD; mid-term users: 90-179 cDDD, and long-term users: ≥ 180 cDDD, respectively). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Among the 6037 HCC patients, 2043 (33.84%) were PPI users. PPI users demonstrated better median RFS (3.10 years, interquartile range [IQR] 1.49-5.01) compared with non-users (2.73 years, IQR 1.20-4.74; with an adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] of 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.74, P < 0.001). When considering the cumulative dosage of PPI, only long-term PPI users had significant lower risk of HCC recurrence than non-PPI group (adj-HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.35-0.70; P < 0.001). Moreover, the impact of long-term PPIs use on improving RFS was significant in most of the subgroup analysis, except in patients with advanced tumor stages, with non-cirrhosis, or with a history of chronic kidney disease. However, there were no significant differences in median OS between PPI users and non-users (4.23 years, IQR 2.73-5.86 vs 4.04 years, IQR 2.51-5.82, P = 0.369).

CONCLUSION

Long-term PPI use (≥ 180 cDDD) may be associated with a better RFS in HCC patients after hepatectomy.

Long-Term Intake of Proton-Pump Inhibitors Could Be Associated with an Increased Incidence of Liver Cancer in Women

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in gastroenterology. Although PPIs are mostly well tolerated, long-term PPI intake has been linked with diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis and infectious disease. In the present study, we evaluated a potential association between PPI intake and a subsequent diagnosis of liver cancer in a large real-world cohort of outpatients in Germany.

METHODS

A total of 1766 patients with liver cancer, as well as 8830 propensity-score-matched controls, were identified from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA). The outcome of the study was the association between PPI use and a subsequent diagnosis of liver cancer, which was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 42.9% of the liver cancer patients and 39.0% of the controls received at least one PPI prescription before the index date. PPI prescriptions at any time before the index date were associated with an increased risk of subsequent liver cancer (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06-1.31). The positive association was observed in all age groups, as well as in women and men, but only in women (OR: 1.30; 95% 1.09-1.55) did it reach the predefined level of significance (p < 0.01). When considering the duration of PPI therapy, only PPI therapy for at least two years was significantly associated with an increased risk of liver cancer (OR: 1.28; 95% 1.09-1.50). In an analysis stratified by age and sex, this association was strongest in the age group < 60 years (OR: 1.99; 95% 1.21-3.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that long-term PPI intake in women as well as in patients < 60 years might be associated with an increased risk of liver cancer. These findings support current efforts to reduce the inappropriate use of PPIs in routine clinical practice and to link PPI prescribing to a clear medical indication.

Adverse Effects Associated with Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors

Proton Pump Inhibitors are used widely to manage many gastric acid-related conditions such as gastroesophageal disease, gastritis, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, peptic ulcer disease, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcers, and Helicobacter pylori eradication, around the globe. This review article focuses on adverse effects associated with the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors. Various observational studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses have established the adverse effects associated with the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors including renal disorders (acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease), cardiovascular risks (major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke), fractures, infections (Clostridium difficile infection, community-acquired pneumonia, and Coronavirus disease 2019), micronutrient deficiencies (hypomagnesemia, anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia), hypergastrinemia, cancers (gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatic cancer), hepatic encephalopathy, and dementia. Clinicians including prescribers and pharmacists should be aware of the adverse effects of taking proton pump inhibitors for an extended period of time. In addition, the patients taking proton pump inhibitors for long-term should be monitored for the listed adverse effects. The American Gastroenterological association recommends a few non-pharmacological measures and the use of histamine 2 blockers to lessen gastrointestinal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflex disease and the utilization of proton pump inhibitors treatment if there is a definitive indication. Additionally, the American Gastroenterological association's Best Practice Advice statements emphasize deprescribing when there is no clear indication for proton pump inhibitors therapy.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cancer Risk: An Umbrella Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

OBJECTIVES

Increasing evidence suggested that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use might affect the development of cancers, but previous conclusions remain controversial. Therefore, an umbrella review was performed to clarify the associations between PPIs and various types of cancer by summarizing the existing meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP database up to June 2022 for eligible meta-analyses or systematic reviews. The summary effect size, 95% CI, heterogeneity, small study effect, and 95% prediction interval were considered in the present study. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Review 2 and grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation were used to assess methodological quality and evidence.

RESULTS

The umbrella review included 21 meta-analyses containing 65 studies and 10 cancer types with 6.8 million subjects. The results showed that PPI use was significantly associated with increased risks of certain types of cancer, including gastric cancer (odds ratio [OR]: 2.07; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.29), pancreatic cancer (OR: 1.73; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.44), colorectal cancer (OR: 1.84; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.67), and liver cancer (OR: 1.80; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.54), but was not associated with esophageal cancer. In addition, PPI use was associated with decreased risk of breast cancer (OR: 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that clinicians should pay more attention to the occurrence of gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, and liver cancer in patients who used PPIs, and PPI prescription should be written only when an accurate specific diagnosis has been made. Furthermore, additional PPIs to the treatment regimen may be benefit for women with a higher-than-average risk of breast cancer.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risk of Gastric Cancer: Current Evidence from Epidemiological Studies and Critical Appraisal

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used for maintaining or improving gastric problems. Evidence from observational studies indicates that PPI therapy is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer. However, the evidence for PPIs increasing the risk of gastric cancer is still being debated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether long-term PPI use is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer. We systematically searched the relevant literature in electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search and collection of eligible studies was between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2021. Two independent authors were responsible for the study selection process, and they considered only observational studies that compared the risk of gastric cancer with PPI treatment. We extracted relevant information from selected studies, and assessed the quality using the Newcastle−Ottawa scale (NOS). Finally, we calculated overall risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of gastric cancer in the group receiving PPI therapy and the control group. Thirteen observational studies, comprising 10,557 gastric cancer participants, were included. Compared with patients who did not take PPIs, the pooled RR for developing gastric cancer in patients receiving PPIs was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.46−2.22, p < 0.001). The overall risk of gastric cancer also increased in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), H. pylori treatment, and various adjusted factors. The findings were also consistent across several sensitivity analyses. PPI use is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer in patients compared with those with no PPI treatment. The findings of this updated study could be used in making clinical decisions between physicians and patients about the initiation and continuation of PPI therapy, especially in patients at high risk of gastric cancer. Additionally, large randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether PPIs are associated with a higher risk of gastric cancer.

Association between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Korean Nationally Representative Cohort Study

(1) Background: The association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been controversial, especially in the general population. We aimed to determine the impact of PPI on HCC risk in participants without liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis virus infection. (2) Methods: We assessed 406,057 participants from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database who underwent health screening from 2003 to 2006. We evaluated exposure to PPI before the index date using a standardized daily defined dose (DDD) system. The association of proton pump inhibitor use with the risk of HCC was evaluated using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression. (3) Results: Compared with non-users, PPI use was not associated with the HCC risk in low (<30 DDDs; aHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91−1.27), intermediate (30 ≤ PPI < 60 DDDs; aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.73−1.26), and high (≥60 DDDs; aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63−1.17) PPI groups in the final adjustment model. In addition, risks of cirrhosis-associated HCC and non-cirrhosis-associated HCC were not significantly associated with PPI use. The results remained consistent after excluding events that occurred within 1, 2, and 3 years to exclude pre-existing conditions that may be associated with the development of HCC. We also found no PPI-associated increase in HCC risk among the selected population, such as those with obesity, older age, and chronic liver diseases. (4) Conclusions: PPI use may not be associated with HCC risk regardless of the amount. We call for future studies conducted in other regions to generalize our findings.

Proton pump inhibitors and colorectal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is common worldwide, with reports suggesting that they may be overused. Several studies have found that PPI may affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk.

AIM

To summarize current knowledge on the relationship between PPI and CRC from basic research, epidemiological and clinical studies.

METHODS

This systematic review was based on the patients, interventions, comparisons, outcome models and performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until May 17, 2021. The initial search returned 2591 articles, of which, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The studies were categorized as basic research studies (n = 12), epidemiological studies (n = 11), and CRC treatment studies (n = 5). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool depending on the study design.

RESULTS

Data from basic research indicates that PPI do not stimulate CRC development via the trophic effect of gastrin but instead may paradoxically inhibit it. These studies also suggest that PPI may have properties beneficial for CRC treatment. PPI appear to have anti-tumor properties (omeprazole, pantoprazole), and are potential T lymphokine-activated killer cell-originated protein kinase inhibitors (pantoprazole, ilaprazole), and chemosensitizing agents (pantoprazole). However, these mechanisms have not been confirmed in human trials. Current epidemiological studies suggest that there is no causal association between PPI use and increased CRC risk. Treatment studies show that concomitant PPI and capecitabine use may reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy resulting in poorer oncological outcomes, while also suggesting that pantoprazole may have a chemosensitizing effect with the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen.

CONCLUSION

An unexpected inhibitory effect of PPI on CRC carcinogenesis by way of several potential mechanisms is noted. This review identifies that different PPI agents may have differential effects on CRC treatment, with practical implications. Prospective studies are warranted to delineate this relationship and assess the role of individual PPI agents.

Comprehensive analysis of proton pump inhibitors and risk of digestive tract cancers

BACKGROUND

For the past two decades, dispute on whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) leads to digestive tract cancer remains, and emerging studies in recent years still demonstrate inconsistent results, which continues to perpetuate concerns over the safety of PPI use. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, with comprehensive evaluation by Bradford Hill criteria of causation, to assess the effect of PPI use on digestive tract cancers.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for observational studies published up to 15th January 2021. Pooled relative risks (RRs) were estimated via random effects models. Cumulative defined daily dose- and duration-risk relationships using restricted cubic spline and fractional polynomial models were investigated. Bradford Hill criteria were applied to evaluate causation. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42020211103.

RESULTS

Thirty-two publications containing 4,355,254 participants were included. PPI use is associated with an increased risk of overall digestive tract cancers (RR = 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33 to 2.00). PPI use is correlated with increased risks of gastric cancer (RR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.31), pancreatic cancer (RR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.82) and liver cancer (RR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.52), but not of esophageal cancer (RR = 2.06, 95% CI 0.65 to 6.57) and colorectal cancer (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.66). The association between PPI and digestive tract cancers is stronger in people with minimal exposure. When cumulative defined daily dose or duration increases, the risks decline and become non-significant. Evaluation by Bradford Hill criteria indicates weak evidence of causation.

CONCLUSIONS

A causal relationship between PPI use and digestive tract cancers is not supported by the evidence in the current review. Concerns over carcinogenic side-effects of PPI might be unfounded.

Potential proton pump inhibitor-related adverse effects

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most common medications taken by patients worldwide. PPIs are used to treat acid-related disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug/stress ulceration. For some of these diseases, long-term treatment is necessary. With such prolonged use, concern and investigation into potential adverse effects has increased. In addition, data are available regarding potential anticancer effects of PPIs, especially regarding solid tumors. The aim of this review is to assess the literature on PPIs with regard to common concerns, such as drug-drug interactions, the intestinal microbiome, dementia and central nervous system disease, and osteoporosis, as well as to highlight potential negative and positive impacts of the drug in cancer.