Resistance Training Improves Vasoreactivity in End-Stage Heart Failure Patients on Inotropic Support

Resistance exercise for cardiac rehabilitation

Lean mass abnormalities are highly prevalent in patients referred for cardiac rehabilitation (CR). As such, current guidelines recommend incorporating resistance exercise (RE) into the exercise prescription of Phase II-IV CR. The effects of RE on health-related outcomes in patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) have not been extensively investigated in comparison to aerobic exercise, the traditional modality of exercise implemented in CR. The purpose of this review is to highlight the growing prevalence of lean mass abnormalities such as dynapenia and sarcopenia in CVD and briefly outline the contributing pathophysiology of these impairments as potential targets for RE training. An update on the current evidence pertaining to the effects of RE on exercise capacity, skeletal muscle strength, body composition, CV health, and quality of life in CR patient populations is provided. The current recommendations for RE training in CR are discussed. Future directions for research and clinical practice in this field are highlighted, and included the need to identify the most efficacious principles of resistance training for different health related outcomes in CVD, as well as the suggested drive towards a 'personalized medicine' approach to exercise prescription in CR.

Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Heart Failure: JACC Expert Panel

Cardiac rehabilitation is defined as a multidisciplinary program that includes exercise training, cardiac risk factor modification, psychosocial assessment, and outcomes assessment. Exercise training and other components of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are safe and beneficial and result in significant improvements in quality of life, functional capacity, exercise performance, and heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations in patients with HF. Despite outcome benefits, cost-effectiveness, and strong practice guideline recommendations, CR remains underused. Clinicians, health care leaders, and payers should prioritize incorporating CR as part of the standard of care for patients with HF.

Exercise interventions in solid organ transplant candidates: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Exercise training may be recommended to solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates to improve fitness and tolerance before surgery. We aimed to determine the acceptance, safety, and effectiveness of exercise interventions in SOT candidates.

METHODS

Online databases were searched. Studies of any design were included. Outcomes of interest were acceptance, safety, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles were included. Acceptance ranged from 16% to 100%. In the fifteen studies that assessed adverse events, none mentioned any adverse events occurring during the study. Five out of seven studies reported an increase in maximal exercise capacity post-exercise in the intervention group (range of mean change: 0.45 to 2.9 mL/kg). Eight out of fourteen studies reported an increase in 6-minute walking distance in the intervention group after the training period (range of mean change: 40-105 m). Two articles showed an improvement in the mental composite scores as well as in the physical composite scores post-exercise in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

There was a lack of significant findings among most randomized controlled trials. Exercise training is acceptable and safe for selective SOT candidates. The effects of exercise training on exercise capacity and quality of life in SOT candidates are unclear.

Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Heart Failure: Clinical Evidence

People with heart failure experience marked reduction in their exercise capacity which has detrimental effects on their activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, and ultimately their hospital ad-mission rate and mortality. Numerous cardiac rehabilitation studies have demonstrated functional benefits, improvement in quality of life and clinical outcomes from exercise training in patients with HFrEF. Based on evidences, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, European Society of Cardiology, and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence(NICE) consistently recommend exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation(CR) as an effective and safe adjunct for patients with stable class II to III heart failure (HF) who do not have advanced arrhythmias and who do not have other limitations to exercise. This recommendation applies to patients with HFrEF as well as to patients with HFpEF besides patients with class IV HF, although the data are not as robust for patients with HFpEF. In this article, the clinical evidence on effects of exercise for HFrEF and HFpEF as well as end-stage heart failure were separately reviewed.

Effects of exercise interventions on peripheral vascular endothelial vasoreactivity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Changes in vascular function, such as endothelial dysfunction are linked to the progression of heart failure (HF) and poorer outcomes, such as increased hospitalisations. Exercise training may positively influence endothelial function in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. The aim of this manuscript is to summarise HF studies evaluating the influence of exercise training on endothelial function as measured by flow mediated vasodilation as a primary outcome and to provide recommendations for future research studies designed to improve peripheral vascular function in HF. Databases were searched for studies published between 1995 and December 2011. Two reviewers determined eligibility and extracted information on study characteristics and quality, exercise interventions, and endothelial function. Eleven articles (N=318 HF participants with an ejection fraction <40%) were eligible for full review. Aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise training improved endothelium-dependent vasodilation as measured by ultrasound or plethysmography. There is less evidence supporting improvement in endothelium-independent function with exercise training. Sample sizes were small and predominantly male. Future research is needed to address the best mode and optimal dose of exercise for all patients with HF including women and subgroups with specific co-morbidities.

Blood flow restricted exercise and vascular function

It is established that regular aerobic training improves vascular function, for example, endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and arterial stiffness or compliance and thereby constitutes a preventative measure against cardiovascular disease. In contrast, high-intensity resistance training impairs vascular function, while the influence of moderate-intensity resistance training on vascular function is still controversial. However, aerobic training is insufficient to inhibit loss in muscular strength with advancing age; thus, resistance training is recommended to prevent sarcopenia. Recently, several lines of study have provided compelling data showing that exercise and training with blood flow restriction (BFR) leads to muscle hypertrophy and strength increase. As such, BFR training might be a novel means of overcoming the contradiction between aerobic and high-intensity resistance training. Although it is not enough evidence to obtain consensus about impact of BFR training on vascular function, available evidences suggested that BFR training did not change coagulation factors and arterial compliance though with inconsistence results in endothelial function. This paper is a review of the literature on the impact of BFR exercise and training on vascular function, such as endothelial function, arterial compliance, or other potential factors in comparison with those of aerobic and resistance training.

Exercise as a nonpharmacologic intervention in patients with heart failure

For patients with heart failure (HF), dyspnea and fatigue resulting in diminished exercise tolerance are among the main factors that contribute to decreased social and physical functioning and quality of life. There has long been evidence to suggest that measures of cardiac function, such as ejection fraction and cardiac output, only poorly correlate with a patient's exercise capacity, indicating the involvement of factors other than those impacting central circulation. The lack of a close correlation between central hemodynamics and exercise tolerance has led to investigations into alterations in the periphery, such as abnormalities in vascular endothelial function, hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system, and changes in structure and oxidative capacity of skeletal muscle, which are commonly seen in patients with HF. Over the past 2 decades, numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the beneficial impact of exercise training on skeletal muscle energy metabolism, vascular function, and ventilatory capacity, which correlate with improvements in exercise tolerance, hospitalization rates, and quality of life of patients with HF. In accordance with recent guidelines established by the leading cardiology societies in the United States and Europe, physicians are urged to emphasize exercise training for all clinically stable patients with HF using individualized protocols that feature early mobilization after acute exacerbations of the disease and gradual increases in intensity.