Use of Cyproheptadine for the Treatment of Serotonin Syndrome: A Case Series

Management of serotonin syndrome (toxicity)

Serotonin syndrome (toxicity), resulting from an excessive accumulation of serotonin in the central nervous system, it can occur due to various factors such as the initiation of medication, overdose or drug interactions. Diagnosing serotonin toxicity presents challenges as there are no definitive criteria. This review delves into the pathophysiology, incidence, clinical assessment and management of serotonin toxicity, stressing the significance of promptly recognizing and managing severe cases. Diagnosis relies primarily relies on clinical assessment due to the absence of specific laboratory tests. The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity criteria are commonly utilized but have only been validated in the overdose setting. Assessing the severity of toxicity is crucial for guiding management decisions. Supportive care, discontinuation of causative agents and symptomatic treatment are prioritized in management. Mild toxicity often requires withdrawal or reduction of the serotonergic agent, while more severe toxicity requires more aggressive resuscitative and supportive care. Severe serotonin toxicity characterized by hyperthermia and rigidity requires aggressive supportive measures, including benzodiazepines, intubation, paralysis and active cooling. Animal studies suggest potential benefits of 5-HT2A receptor antagonists in preventing hyperthermia and fatalities, but only at high doses. Their clinical effectiveness remains uncertain, and evidence is predominately from case series and case reports. Although commonly used, serotonin antagonists like cyproheptadine lack conclusive evidence of efficacy. Other serotonin antagonists such as chlorpromazine and olanzapine have been explored but evidence is limited to case reports. Hence, the cornerstone of treating severe cases does not lie in 'antidote' administration or even diagnosis but in effective early resuscitative and supportive care.

Serotonin syndrome controversies: A need for consensus

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a drug-induced clinical syndrome resulting from increased serotonergic activity in the central nervous system. Although more than seven decades have passed since the first description of SS, it is still an enigma in terms of terminology, clinical features, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic measures. The majority of SS cases have previously been reported by toxicology or psychiatry centers, particularly in people with mental illness. However, serotonergic medications are used for a variety of conditions other than mental illness. Serotonergic properties have been discovered in several new drugs, including over-the-counter medications. These days, cases are reported in non-toxicology centers, such as perioperative settings, neurology clinics, cardiology settings, gynecology settings, and pediatric clinics. Overdoses or poisonings of serotonergic agents constituted the majority of the cases observed in toxicology or psychiatry centers. Overdose or poisoning of serotonergic drugs is uncommon in other clinical settings. Patients may develop SS at therapeutic dosages. Moreover, these patients may continue to use serotonergic medications even if they develop mild to moderate SS due to several reasons. Thus, the clinical presentation (onset, severity, and clinical features) in such instances may not exactly match what toxicologists or psychiatrists observe in their respective settings. They produce considerable diversity in many aspects of SS. However, other experts discount these new developments in SS. Since SS is a potentially lethal illness, consensus is required on several concerns related to SS.

Serotonin syndrome treated with cyproheptadine using NPi from a digital pupillometer as a therapeutic indicator: A case report

RATIONALE

Serotonin syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition resulting from the use of antidepressants, their interactions with other serotonergic medications, or poisoning. It presents with a triad of psychiatric, dysautonomic, and neurological symptoms and is sometimes fatal. While cyproheptadine is a specific treatment option, the optimal duration of its administration remains unclear. The purpose of this report is to quantitatively assess the endpoints of serotonin syndrome treatment. Based on the hypothesis that neurological pupil index (NPi) on a digital pupil recorder would correlate with the severity of the serotonin syndrome, we administered cyproheptadine using NPi as an indicator.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A patient with a history of depression was brought to our hospital after he overdosed on 251 tablets of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors.

DIAGNOSES

On day 3, the patient was diagnosed with serotonin syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS

Cyproheptadine syrup was administered at 4 mg every 4 hours. The NPi of the automated pupillometer was simultaneously measured. On day 5, the NPi exceeded 3.0 cyproheptadine was discontinued.

OUTCOMES

The patient was discharged on day 7.

LESSONS

The lack of considerable improvement during the treatment period suggests that the patient may have improved on his own. In this case, the relationship between NPi and the severity of serotonin syndrome could not be determined.

Cyproheptadine in serotonin syndrome: A retrospective study

Objective

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is an iatrogenic life-threatening condition caused by serotonergic agents. The treatment for SS involves the administration of a serotonin antagonist (cyproheptadine). However, the dosing schedule for cyproheptadine is not uniform in the literature.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 23 adult patients (>18 years) admitted to the Neurology Department and met the Hunter criteria for SS.

Results

The mean age was 35.2 years, and 52% were female. Ten patients were managed in the intensive care unit (ICU), whereas thirteen patients were admitted to the ward. Hyperreflexia was the most common clinical feature (100%), followed by clonus (91%), tachycardia (83%), and tremor (83%). Other common clinical features were rigidity (65%), increased bowel sound (61%), diaphoresis (48%), fever (43%), hypertension (39%), and myoclonus (30%). All but one patient received two or more serotonergic drugs. Tramadol was the most common serotonergic agent (39%), followed by sodium valproate (21%), and amitriptyline (21%). Cyproheptadine was administered to all patients. All patients admitted in the ICU received a loading dose of 12 mg followed by 2 mg every 2 h for at least 24 h. All patients admitted to the ward were given 4 mg of cyproheptadine three times each day. Every patient showed at least some response to cyproheptadine within 24 h. The total doses of cyproheptadine and the length of treatment differed between patients.

Conclusion

Any response to cyproheptadine at a therapeutic dose within 24 h, even a partial one, could be a diagnostic indicator of the existence of SS.

Therapeutic cyproheptadine regimen in serotonin syndrome: Complications after cardiovascular surgery

Serotonin syndrome can be a life-threatening condition that occurs from the overactivity of serotonin in the central nervous system. This report describes the use of cyproheptadine for the management of serotonin syndrome in a patient taking fluoxetine and bupropion, who received methylene blue for vasoplegia syndrome. A 61-year-old female taking fluoxetine and bupropion preoperatively was given a total of three doses of methylene blue 100 mg IV within a brief time frame during and after a planned coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Postoperatively, the patient was not following commands, was agitated and confused, febrile with diaphoresis, tachycardic, had muscle rigidity, and horizontal ocular clonus. The patient's presentation was most consistent with serotonin syndrome due to a drug-drug interaction. Cyproheptadine and supportive care were used successfully to treat serotonin syndrome, and the patient was discharged home 14 days postoperatively. Based on the literature, there is no standardized method of weaning cyproheptadine when used for serotonin syndrome. The patient in our case received a total of 188 mg of cyproheptadine over the course of 10 days and did not experience any side effects. This case highlights a potential dosing regimen that can be used for other patients.

Off-Label Cyproheptadine in Children and Adolescents: Psychiatric Comorbidities, Interacting Variables, Safety, and Risks of Hepatotoxicity

Cyproheptadine is a widely prescribed first-generation antihistamine, and due to its unique chemical structure, it has a popular off-label choice for a range of clinical conditions. Its efficacy is widely debated in the literature, but there are reports of hepatotoxicity as a rare adverse effect. Its benefits in migraine prophylaxis and appetite stimulation also underscore a highly overlapping clinical pathway that requires additional assessment and evaluation. The evidence suggests a baseline metabolic profile before initiation and assessment for co-occurring mental health conditions may improve overall response with evidence-based mental health interventions.

The serotonin toxidrome: shortfalls of current diagnostic criteria for related syndromes

INTRODUCTION

Serotonin syndrome (toxicity) describes adverse drug effects from toxic amounts of intra-synaptic central nervous system serotonin. A wide range of drugs have been implicated to cause serotonin toxicity, not all justifiably. The plausible agents all have a final common pathway resulting in a substantial increase in central nervous system serotonergic neurotransmission. Serotonin toxicity is characterized by neuromuscular excitation, mental status changes, and autonomic dysregulation. Signs and symptoms represent a spectrum of toxicity (mild to life-threatening) related to increasing serotonin concentrations. As there is no consensus on the threshold for "toxicity" or diagnostic criteria, the true incidence of serotonin toxicity is unknown. The incidence in overdose is easier to quantify and is reasonably common in serotonergic antidepressant overdoses. In a large case series of overdoses, moderate serotonin toxicity occurred in 14% of poisonings with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. While half those ingesting a monoamine oxidase inhibitor in combination with a serotonergic agent in overdose exhibit at least moderately severe serotonin toxicity. In contrast, the incidence of serotonin toxicity in those on therapeutic serotonergic agents appears to be very low.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a narrative review of the current diagnostic criteria, utilizing case reports of fatalities to evaluate how many meet the various diagnostic criteria and propose practical solutions to resolve controversies in diagnosis.

METHODS

A review of serotonin toxicity diagnostic criteria in the English literature was completed by searching Embase and PubMed from January 1990 to July 2021 for the keywords "serotonin syndrome/toxicity" paired with "diagnostic criteria" or "diagnosis." Also, fatal cases of serotonin toxicity identified from a recent systematic review were independently examined to determine what diagnostic criteria were met and whether serotonin toxicity or another cause was most likely.

REVIEW OF DIAGNOSIS CRITERIA

Serotonin toxicity is a clinical diagnosis, four diagnostic criteria (Sternbach, Serotonin Syndrome Scale, Radomski, and Hunter) have been proposed. However, the Serotonin Syndrome Scale has not been validated in patients with serotonin toxicity and only utilized in those on a serotonergic agent. The remaining three criteria are utilized more widely but have undergone little refinement or validation.

REVIEW OF FATAL CASES

Shortfalls with diagnostic criteria can be illustrated by examining case fatalities. Of 55 fatal cases reviewed, 12 (22%) were unlikely to be serotonin toxicity. Sternbach and Radomski criteria were met by 25 (45%), 20 (36%) had insufficient data reported and 10 (18%) met an exclusion criterion. Few had sufficient information reported to determine whether Hunter Criteria were met, with only 13 (24%) documented as meeting the criteria, the remaining 42 (76%) had insufficient data.

RESOLVING SHORTFALLS IN CURRENT DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA

As serotonin toxicity is a clinical diagnosis, issues arise when basing the diagnosis on symptom criteria alone, without considering whether the drug/s ingested increase central nervous system serotonin or whether there is an alternative diagnosis. This has resulted in case reports and government warnings for drugs that cannot plausibly cause significant serotonin toxicity (e.g., ondansetron and antipsychotics). We propose when assessing for a serotonin toxidrome, both the causative agent(s) and clinical scenario is considered to determine the likelihood of serotonin toxicity. Then the clinical features assessed, those with a moderate to high prior probability (e.g., serotonergic drug-drug interaction, overdose, recent initiation or increase in dose of serotonergic agent/s) could be diagnosed based on the Hunter criteria. However, those with a low probability (e.g., stable therapeutic doses of a serotonergic agent) require more specific and stringent criteria. Finally, we propose a minimum dataset for case reports/series of serotonin toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

More complete and accurate reporting of serotonin toxicity cases is required in the future, to avoid further misleading associations that are physiologically implausible.

Antiepileptic drugs and serotonin syndrome- A systematic review of case series and case reports

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a drug‑induced, potentially fatal, clinical syndrome resulting from drugs that have serotonergic properties. Several antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are known to have serotonergic properties and it can be hypothesized that such AEDs can cause SS. This study aims to review the literature on SS in patients receiving AEDs. We performed a systematic review of Scopus and MEDLINE/PUBMED for case reports and case series of SS where patients had received at least one AED at the onset of symptoms. The cases published in the English literature between 1 January 1991 and 1 April 2021 were included. Initial search identified 1263 articles of which 63 (76 patients) were included in the final analysis. Most of the included cases (53 cases, 70%) have been published in the last 10 years. The mean age of the 76 patients was 40.6 ± 17.8 years, and 51% of cases were females. These patients had been exposed to a total of 8 different types of AEDs. Valproic acid was the most common drug (29, 38%), followed by lamotrigine (22, 29%), gabapentin (16, 21%), pregabalin (seven, 9%), topiramate (five, 7%) and carbamazepine (two, 3%). There has been one case each with phenytoin and oxcarbazepine. Seven (9%) patients received more than one AEDs. Most patients (67, 88%) also received other serotoninergic agents. Only nine (12%) patients were on AEDs alone. The most common clinical condition for using AEDs was psychiatric disorders (36 patients, 47.3%), followed by migraine (17, 22.4%), other painful conditions (15, 19.7%), epilepsy (7, 9.2%), and perioperative conditions (8, 10.5%). Death was reported in two patients. We suggest that AEDs, because of their serotonergic properties, may induce SS, especially in patients who are on another serotonergic agent.

Postoperative Serotonin Syndrome Following Methylene Blue Administration for Vasoplegia After Cardiac Surgery: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Serotonin syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition associated with increased serotonergic activity in the central nervous system. The increasing incidence of this condition is thought to parallel the increasing use of serotonergic agents in medical practice. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are perhaps the most commonly implicated group of medications associated with serotonin syndrome. This case report describes the occurrence of postoperative serotonin syndrome in a patient on long-term sertraline who underwent coronary artery bypass graft and was treated with methylene blue for perioperative vasoplegia. It delineates the various clinical features commonly encountered and illustrates the recommended management modalities, including prevention, for this potentially lethal medical emergency. With prompt diagnosis and expeditious treatment, the patient has had full recovery.