Antipsychotic prescription filling in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

Patterns of antipsychotic prescriptions in patients with schizophrenia in China: A national survey

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the patterns and correlates of antipsychotic prescriptions among recently discharged inpatients with schizophrenia in China.

METHODS

The study included discharged patients from 41 tertiary psychiatric hospitals in 29 provinces between March 19-30, 2019. A total of 1032 inpatients with schizophrenia were included. Socio-demographic and clinical data were retrieved from medical records upon discharge.

RESULTS

Patients received a total of 13 unique antipsychotic medications, which included 9 s-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and 4 first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs). The utilization rates of SGAs and FGAs were 98.8 % and 6.1 % respectively. The three most commonly antipsychotic medications were risperidone (35.1 %), olanzapine (31.3 %), and clozapine (24.6 %). The mean chlorpromazine equivalent dose was 452.12 ± 230.74 mg/day. The utilization rate of mood stabilizers was 18.9 %, 8.8 % for antidepressants, 20.3 % for sleep improvers, and 9.9 % for anticholinergics. More than two fifths patients (43.1 %) received two or more antipsychotic medications. Predictors of antipsychotic polypharmacy included younger age, residing in Central or West China, a longer duration of illness, a history of prior hospitalizations, and having agitated behavior during the hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Antipsychotic polypharmacy in China is common on inpatients settings. The proportion of antipsychotic polypharmacy in China is higher than in many other countries, despite limited data to support the efficacy of many combinations. Clozapine remains one of most commonly prescribed antipsychotics in China, either as a monotherapy or combination therapy.

Antipsychotic use among persons with schizophrenia in Sweden and Finland, trends and differences

OBJECTIVES

To compare the differences in prevalence of antipsychotic and adjunctive pharmacotherapy use among individuals with schizophrenia between Sweden and Finland during 2006-2016.

METHODS

Nationwide register-based data were utilized for constructing two separate cohorts: all persons in Finland with a diagnosis of schizophrenia treated in inpatient care during 1972-2014, and persons in Sweden aged 16-64 with recorded diagnoses of schizophrenia in inpatient or specialized outpatient care, sickness absence or disability pension during 2005-2013. The prevalence of use was assessed as a point prevalence on 31 October each year 2006-2016, based on drug use periods modelled with the PRE2DUP method. In 2016, the Finnish cohort included 37,780 persons and Swedish cohort 25,433 persons.

RESULTS

The most commonly used antipsychotic in 2016 was oral olanzapine in both countries (22.7% [95% CI 21.6-22.4] in Finland, 20.9% [20.4-21.4] in Sweden), followed by clozapine which was more frequently used in Finland (22.0%, 21.6-22.4) than in Sweden (14.8%, 14.4-15.3). Long-acting injectable (LAI) use was almost two times more likely in Sweden (21.6%, 95% CI 21.1-22.1) than in Finland (12.8%, 12.5-13.1), a difference which was due to more common use of FG-LAIs in Sweden. A four-fold difference was observed in Z-drugs use (19.9% in Sweden versus 5.0% in Finland).

CONCLUSION

Potential explanations for the observed discrepancies include differences in national treatment guidelines, methods of data collection, patient characteristics and/or attitudes towards treatment among both patients and physicians.

The effect of non-adherence to antipsychotic treatment on rehospitalization in patients with psychotic disorders

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many patients with psychotic disorders are non-adherent to antipsychotic (AP) medication(s), potentially contributing to rehospitalization. It is unknown whether non-adherence in different phases of AP use is associated with rehospitalization. The aim of this study was to assess the association between non-adherence to APs and rehospitalization in patients with psychotic disorders. Non-adherence was assessed specifically for the initiation, continued drug use and early discontinuation of AP use.

METHODS

A retrospective follow-up study was performed. Adult patients were included at discharge if they suffered from schizophrenia, psychotic, or bipolar I disorder; had been hospitalized in a psychiatric hospital for ⩾7 days; and were treated with oral APs. Patients discharged between January 2006 and December 2009 from Altrecht Mental Health Care were included. Non-adherence was studied in the three phases of medication use: initiation, continued drug use (implementation) and (early) discontinuation after discharge until the end of follow up or until patients were rehospitalized. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the strength of the association between non-adherence for the different phases of AP use and rehospitalization during follow up and expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 417 patients were included. Patients who did not initiate their APs compared with those who did in the first month (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.19-2.19) and between the first and third month after discharge (RR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.04-2.79) had the highest risk for rehospitalization during follow up. Overall, patients who did not initiate their AP medication within the first year after discharge had a RR of 2.70 (95% CI: 1.97-3.68) for rehospitalization during follow up compared with those that initiated their AP.

CONCLUSION

Not initiating APs right after discharge was associated with an increased risk of rehospitalization. Interventions should aim to promote the initiation of APs soon after discharge to minimize the risk of rehospitalization.

Service Use Following First-Episode Schizophrenia Among Commercially Insured Youth

OBJECTIVE

To investigate patterns of mental health service and antipsychotic use following a first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and to examine the role of the treatment setting in which individuals are first diagnosed.

METHOD

Analysis of de-identified administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse was used to identify 1450 privately insured youth and young adults aged 14 through 30 with FES from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. Regression analysis was used to estimate the use of mental health services during the year following FES, by type of service and by site of index diagnosis.

RESULTS

In the year following FES, 79.7% of youth received outpatient mental health services and 35.8% filled a prescription for antipsychotic medication. Among service users, mean outpatient visits were 15.9 and mean antipsychotic fills were 8.3. Youth who received an index diagnosis of FES in an inpatient setting were more likely to fill an antipsychotic medication than youth with FES in other settings. Youth who received an index diagnosis of FES during a specialty mental health outpatient visit had greater use of outpatient mental health than youth who received their diagnosis during a primary care visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite evidence-based guidelines supporting outpatient psychosocial care and antipsychotic treatment for FES, one-fifth of this cohort did not use outpatient services and the majority did not fill any prescriptions for antipsychotic medications during the year following FES. Our findings provide renewed urgency to ongoing efforts to accelerate early identification and care coordination for youth with FES.

Predicting rehospitalization in patients treated with antipsychotics: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Prediction of rehospitalization in patients treated with antipsychotics is important for identifying patients in need of additional support to prevent hospitalization. Our aim was to identify factors that predict rehospitalization in patients treated with antipsychotics at discharge from a psychiatric hospital.

METHODS

Adult patients suffering from schizophrenia, psychotic or bipolar I disorders who had been hospitalized in a psychiatric hospital for ⩾7 days and were treated with oral antipsychotics at discharge were included. The main outcome was rehospitalization within 6 months after discharge. A prediction model for rehospitalization was constructed including: patient/disease and medication characteristics, patients' beliefs about medicines, and healthcare-professional-rated assessment for all patients. The patients were stratified by diagnosis (schizophrenia and nonschizophrenia). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC_ROC) was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were included and 33.3% of them were rehospitalized within 6 months after discharge. The variables that predicted rehospitalization were duration of hospitalization, patients' attitude towards medicine use, and healthcare-professional-rated assessment with an AUC_ROC of 0.82. Rehospitalization for patients with schizophrenia could be predicted (AUC_ROC = 0.71) by the Global Assessment of Functioning score, age, and harm score. Rehospitalization was predicted (AUC_ROC = 0.73) for nonschizophrenia patients with, for example rehospitalization predicted by the nurse.

CONCLUSIONS

Rehospitalization was predicted by a combination of variables from the patient/disease and medication characteristics, patients' attitude towards medicine use, and healthcare-professional-rated assessment. These variables can be assessed relatively easily at discharge to predict rehospitalization within 6 months.

Adherence to Antipsychotic Medication in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenic Patients: A Systematic Review

Antipsychotics are the drugs prescribed to treat psychotic disorders; however, patients often fail to adhere to their treatment, and this has a severe negative effect on prognosis in these kinds of illnesses. Among the wide range of risk factors for treatment nonadherence, this systematic review covers those that are most important from the point of view of clinicians and patients and proposes guidelines for addressing them. Analyzing 38 studies conducted in a total of 51,796 patients, including patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and bipolar disorder, we found that younger age, substance abuse, poor insight, cognitive impairments, low level of education, minority ethnicity, poor therapeutic alliance, experience of barriers to care, high intensity of delusional symptoms and suspiciousness, and low socioeconomic status are the main risk factors for medication nonadherence in both types of disorder. In the future, prospective studies should be conducted on the use of personalized patient-tailored treatments, taking into account risk factors that may affect each individual, to assess the ability of such approaches to improve adherence and hence prognosis in these patients.

Predictors for initiation of pharmacological prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder--A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Treatment guidelines state that all patients with bipolar disorder should use pharmacological prophylaxis; however the actual use of prophylactic drugs after bipolar disorder diagnosis is unknown. Our aim was to assess the use of, and predictors for, pharmacoprophylaxis in newly diagnosed bipolar disorder patients.

METHODS

Data from three Swedish nationwide registers were obtained. We identified patients aged 18-75 with a first time diagnosis of bipolar disorder between 2006 and 2012 (n=31,770) and reviewed subsequent mood-stabilizer and antipsychotic prescription fills. In multivariable Cox regression models, we studied demographic and illness related factors as predictors of prescription fills after diagnosis.

RESULTS

In total, 72.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.7-72.7%) of the patients filled a prescription of a prophylactic drug within 3 months after diagnosis. Pharmacological prophylaxis was mainly associated with a longer duration of hospitalization at bipolar disorder diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.18; CI 2.02-2.35 for a hospitalization of ≥28 days compared to <7 days) and previous use of any mood-stabilizer or antipsychotic (inpatients: AHR 1.24; CI 1.17-1.31 and outpatients: AHR 1.78; CI 1.73-1.84).

LIMITATIONS

We had no information on drug prescriptions that were never filled.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of newly diagnosed bipolar disorder patients without pharmacological prophylaxis is substantial. Patients who are naïve to mood-stabilizers and antipsychotics and are hospitalized for a brief period at diagnosis are the ones least likely to initiate pharmacoprophylaxis, suggesting that this group deserves attention in order to improve the long term prognosis.