Rapid Response Electroencephalography for Urgent Evaluation of Patients in Community Hospital Intensive Care Practice

Seizure Assessment and Forecasting With Efficient Rapid-EEG: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparative Effectiveness Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Approximately 30% of critically ill patients have seizures, and more than half of these seizures do not have an overt clinical correlate. EEG is needed to avoid missing seizures and prevent overtreatment with antiseizure medications. Conventional-EEG (cEEG) resources are logistically constrained and unable to meet their growing demand for seizure detection even in highly developed centers. Brief EEG screening with the validated 2HELPS2B algorithm was proposed as a method to triage cEEG resources, but it is hampered by cEEG requirements, primarily EEG technologists. Seizure risk-stratification using reduced time-to-application rapid response-EEG (rrEEG) systems (∼5 minutes) could be a solution. We assessed the noninferiority of the 2HELPS2B score on a 1-hour rrEEG compared to cEEG.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective EEG diagnostic accuracy study was conducted from October 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. Chart and EEG review performed with consecutive sampling at 4 tertiary care centers, included records of patients ≥18 years old, from January 1, 2018, to June 20, 2022. Monte Carlo simulation power analysis yielded n = 500 rrEEG; for secondary outcomes n = 500 cEEG and propensity-score covariate matching was planned. Primary outcome, noninferiority of rrEEG for seizure risk prediction, was assessed per area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Noninferiority margin (0.05) was based on the 2HELPS2B validation study.

RESULTS

A total of 240 rrEEG with follow-on cEEG were obtained. Median age was 64 (interquartile range 22); 42% were female. 2HELPS2B on a 1-hour rrEEG met noninferiority to cEEG (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.90, p = 0.001). Secondary endpoints of comparison with a matched contemporaneous cEEG showed no significant difference in AUC (0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.94, p = 0.31); in false negative rate for the 2HELPS2B = 0 group (p = 1.0) rrEEG (0.021, 95% CI 0-0.062), cEEG (0.016, 95% CI 0-0.048); nor in survival analyses.

DISCUSSION

2HELPS2B on 1-hour rrEEG is noninferior to cEEG for seizure prediction. Patients with low-risk (2HELPS2B = 0) may be able to forgo prolonged cEEG, allowing for increased monitoring of at-risk patients.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that rrEEG is noninferior to cEEG in calculating the 2HELPS2B score to predict seizure risk.

Estimate of Patients With Missed Seizures Because of Delay in Conventional EEG

PURPOSE

There is frequent delay between ordering and placement of conventional EEG. Here we estimate how many patients had seizures during this delay.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty consecutive adult patients who underwent conventional EEG monitoring at the University of Wisconsin Hospital were retrospectively chart reviewed for demographics, time of EEG order, clinical and other EEG-related information. Patients were stratified by use of anti-seizure medications before EEG and into low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups based on 2HELPS2B score (0, 1, or >1). Monte Carlo simulations (500 trials) were performed to estimate seizures during delay.

RESULTS

The median delay from EEG order to performing EEG was 2.00 hours (range of 0.5-8.00 hours) in the total cohort. For EEGs ordered after-hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-8.00 hours), and during business hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-6.00 hours). The place of EEG, intensive care unit, emergency department, and general floor, did not show significant difference (P = 0.84). Anti-seizure medication did not affect time to first seizure in the low-risk (P = 0.37), medium-risk (P = 0.44), or high-risk (P = 0.12) groups. The estimated % of patients who had a seizure in the delay period for low-risk group (2HELPS2B = 0) was 0.8%, for the medium-risk group (2HELPS2B = 1) was 10.3%, and for the high-risk group (2HELPS2B > 1) was 17.6%, and overall risk was 7.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The University of Wisconsin Hospital with 24-hour in-house EEG technologists has a median delay of 2 hours from order to start of EEG, shorter than published reports from other centers. Nonetheless, seizures were likely missed in about 7.2% of patients.

Economic review of point-of-care EEG

Aims: Point-of-care electroencephalogram (POC-EEG) is an acute care bedside screening tool for the identification of nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). The objective of this narrative review is to describe the economic themes related to POC-EEG in the United States (US).Materials and methods: We examined peer-reviewed, published manuscripts on the economic findings of POC-EEG for bedside use in US hospitals, which included those found through targeted searches on PubMed and Google Scholar. Conference abstracts, gray literature offerings, frank advertisements, white papers, and studies conducted outside the US were excluded.Results: Twelve manuscripts were identified and reviewed; results were then grouped into four categories of economic evidence. First, POC-EEG usage was associated with clinical management amendments and antiseizure medication reductions. Second, POC-EEG was correlated with fewer unnecessary transfers to other facilities for monitoring and reduced hospital length of stay (LOS). Third, when identifying NCS or NCSE onsite, POC-EEG was associated with greater reimbursement in Medical Severity-Diagnosis Related Group coding. Fourth, POC-EEG may lower labor costs via decreasing after-hours requests to EEG technologists for conventional EEG (convEEG).Limitations: We conducted a narrative review, not a systematic review. The studies were observational and utilized one rapid circumferential headband system, which limited generalizability of the findings and indicated publication bias. Some sample sizes were small and hospital characteristics may not represent all US hospitals. POC-EEG studies in pediatric populations were also lacking. Ultimately, further research is justified.Conclusions: POC-EEG is a rapid screening tool for NCS and NCSE in critical care and emergency medicine with potential financial benefits through refining clinical management, reducing unnecessary patient transfers and hospital LOS, improving reimbursement, and mitigating burdens on healthcare staff and hospitals. Since POC-EEG has limitations (i.e. no video component and reduced montage), the studies asserted that it did not replace convEEG.

Automated Seizure Detection in Patients with Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Review of Ceribell™ Rapid-EEG Recordings

BACKGROUND

In patients with cardiac arrest who remain comatose after return of spontaneous circulation, seizures and other abnormalities on electroencephalogram (EEG) are common. Thus, guidelines recommend urgent initiation of EEG for the evaluation of seizures in this population. Point-of-care EEG systems, such as Ceribell™ Rapid Response EEG (Rapid-EEG), allow for prompt initiation of EEG monitoring, albeit through a reduced-channel montage. Rapid-EEG incorporates an automated seizure detection software (Clarity™) to measure seizure burden in real time and alert clinicians at the bedside when a high seizure burden, consistent with possible status epilepticus, is identified. External validation of Clarity is still needed. Our goal was to evaluate the real-world performance of Clarity for the detection of seizures and status epilepticus in a sample of patients with cardiac arrest.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of Rapid-EEG recordings from all the patients who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit at Kent Hospital (Warwick, RI) between 6/1/2021 and 3/18/2022 for management after cardiac arrest and who underwent Rapid-EEG monitoring as part of their routine clinical care (n = 21). Board-certified epileptologists identified events that met criteria for seizures or status epilepticus, as per the 2021 American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology, and evaluated any seizure burden detections generated by Clarity.

RESULTS

In this study, 4 of 21 patients with cardiac arrest (19.0%) who underwent Rapid-EEG monitoring had multiple electrographic seizures, and 2 of those patients (9.5%) had electrographic status epilepticus within the first 24 h of the study. None of these ictal abnormalities were detected by the Clarity seizure detection system. Clarity showed 0% seizure burden throughout the entirety of all four Rapid-EEG recordings, including the EEG pages that showed definite seizures or status epilepticus.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of frequent electrographic seizures and/or status epilepticus can go undetected by Clarity. Timely and careful review of all raw Rapid-EEG recordings by a qualified human EEG reader is necessary to guide clinical care, regardless of Clarity seizure burden measurements.

Rapid-Response Electroencephalography in Seizure Diagnosis and Patient Care: Lessons From a Community Hospital

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonconvulsive seizures are a major source of in-hospital morbidity and a cause of unexplained encephalopathy in critically ill patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) is essential to confirm nonconvulsive seizures and can guide patient-specific workup, treatment, and prognostication. In a 208-bed community hospital, EEG services were limited to 1 part-time EEG technician and 1 EEG machine shared between inpatient and outpatient settings. Its use was restricted to typical business hours. A nursing-led quality improvement (QI) project endeavored to enhance access to EEG by introducing a point-of-care rapid-response EEG program. METHODS: For this project, a multidisciplinary protocol was developed to deploy a Food and Drug Administration-cleared, point-of-care rapid-response EEG platform (Ceribell Inc) in a community hospital's emergency department and inpatient units to streamline neurodiagnostic workups. This QI project compared EEG volume, study location, time-to-EEG, number of cases with seizures captured on EEG, and hospital-level financial metrics of diagnosis-related group reimbursements and length of stay for the 6 months before (pre-QI, using conventional EEG) and 6 months after implementing the rapid-response protocol (post-QI). RESULTS: Electroencephalography volume increased from 35 studies pre-QI to 115 post-QI (3.29-fold increase), whereas the median time from EEG order to EEG start decreased 7.6-fold (74 [34-187] minutes post-QI vs 562 [321-1034] minutes pre-QI). Point-of-care EEG was also associated with more confirmed seizure diagnoses compared with conventional EEG (27/115 post-QI vs 0/35 pre-QI). This resulted in additional diagnosis-related group reimbursements and hospital revenue. Availability of point-of-care EEG was also associated with a shorter median length of stay. CONCLUSION: A nurse-led, rapid-response EEG protocol at a community hospital resulted in significant improvements in EEG accessibility and seizure diagnosis with hospital-level financial benefits. By expanding access to EEG, confirming nonconvulsive seizures, and increasing care efficiency, rapid-response EEG protocols can enhance patient care.

Implementation and impact of a point of care electroencephalography platform in a community hospital: a cohort study

Objective

To determine the clinical and financial feasibility of implementing a poc-EEG system in a community hospital.

Design

Data from a prospective cohort displaying abnormal mentation concerning for NCSE or rhythmic movements due to potential underlying seizure necessitating EEG was collected and compared to a control group containing patient data from 2020.

Setting

A teaching community hospital with limited EEG support.

Patients

The study group consisted of patients requiring emergent EEG during hours when conventional EEG was unavailable. Control group is made up of patients who were emergently transferred for EEG during the historical period.

Interventions

Application and interpretation of Ceribell®, a poc-EEG system.

Measurement and main results

88 patients were eligible with indications for poc-EEG including hyperkinetic movements post-cardiac arrest (19%), abnormal mentation after possible seizure (46%), and unresponsive patients with concern for NCSE (35%). 21% had seizure burden on poc-EEG and 4.5% had seizure activity on follow-up EEG. A mean of 1.1 patients per month required transfer to a tertiary care center for continuous EEG. For the control period, a total of 22 patients or a mean of 2 patients per month were transferred for emergent EEG. Annually, we observed a decrease in the number of transferred patients in the post-implementation period by 10.8 (95% CI: -2.17-23.64, p = 0.1). Financial analysis of the control found the hospital system incurred a loss of $3,463.11 per patient transferred for an annual loss of $83,114.64. In the study group, this would compute to an annual loss of $45,713.05 for an overall decrease in amount lost of $37,401.59. We compared amount lost per patient between historical controls and study patients. Implementation of poc-EEG resulted in an overall decrease in annual amount lost of $37,401.59 by avoidance of transfer fees. We calculated the amount gained per patient in the study group to be $13,936.44. To cover the cost of the poc-EEG system, 8.59 patients would need to avoid transfer annually.

Conclusion

A poc-EEG system can be safely implemented in a community hospital leading to an absolute decrease in transfers to tertiary hospital. This decrease in patient transfers can cover the cost of implementing the poc-EEG system. The additional benefits from transfer avoidance include clinical benefits such as rapid appropriate treatment of seizures and avoidance of unnecessary treatment as well as negating transfer risk and keeping the patient at their local hospital.

Point-of-care electroencephalography enables rapid evaluation and management of non-convulsive seizures and status epilepticus in the emergency department

Objectives

To describe our institutional experience with point-of-care electroencephalography (pocEEG) and its impact on the evaluation/management of suspected non-convulsive seizures in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

We retrospectively identified 157 adults who underwent pocEEG monitoring in our community hospital ED in 1 year. We calculated the time to obtain pocEEG in the ED (door-to-EEG time) and examined the impact of pocEEG findings (categorized as seizure, highly epileptiform patterns, slowing, or normal activity) on antiseizure medication treatment.

Results

PocEEG revealed seizures (14%, n = 22), highly epileptiform patterns (22%, n = 34), slowing (44%, n = 69), and normal activity (20%, n = 32). The median door-to-EEG time (from initial ED evaluation to pocEEG monitoring) was only 1.2 hours (interquartile range 0.1-2.1) even though 55% of studies were performed after-hours (5 pm-9 am). Most patients were admitted (54% to the intensive care unit, 41% to floor). Antiseizure medication treatment occurred pre-pocEEG in 93 patients (59%) and post-pocEEG in 88 patients (56%). By reviewing the relationship between pocEEG monitoring and antiseizure medication management, we found a significant association between pocEEG findings and changes in management (P < 0.001). Treatment escalation occurred more frequently in patients with epileptiform activity (seizures or highly epileptiform patterns, 52%) than patients with non-epileptiform activity (normal or slow, 25%, P < 0.001), and avoidance of treatment escalation occurred more frequently in patients with normal or slow activity (27%) than patients with seizures or highly epileptiform patterns (2%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our study, the largest to date describing the real-world use of pocEEG in emergency medicine, found that rapid EEG acquisition in the ED was feasible in a community hospital and significantly affected the management of suspected non-convulsive seizures.

Making SENSE of what we do - How to bring evidence to clinical practice

Status epilepticus is a frequent neurological emergency. Several audits and registries have enhanced our knowledge regarding patient demography, etiology, treatment, and outcome. Several large registries have also contributed significantly to current treatment guidelines that emphasize the importance of instant and effective treatment onset. Large registries also document that deviation from these treatment guidelines is not the exception but the rule. Therefore, careful analysis of the treatment pathways as well as balanced intervention efforts are necessary to overcome the gap between knowledge and action. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Improved access to rapid electroencephalography at a community hospital reduces inter-hospital transfers for suspected non-convulsive seizures

OBJECTIVE

Patients with suspected non-convulsive seizures are optimally evaluated with EEG. However, limited EEG infrastructure at community hospitals often necessitates transfer for long-term EEG monitoring (LTM). Novel point-of-care EEG systems could expedite management of nonconvulsive seizures and reduce unnecessary transfers. We aimed to describe the impact of rapid access to EEG using a novel EEG device with remote expert interpretation (tele-EEG) on rates of transfer for LTM.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified a cohort of patients who underwent Rapid-EEG (Ceribell Inc., Mountain View, CA) monitoring as part of a new standard-of-care at a community hospital. Rapid-EEGs were initially reviewed on-site by a community hospital neurologist before transitioning to tele-EEG review by epileptologists at an affiliated academic hospital. We compared the rate of transfer for LTM after Rapid-EEG/tele-EEG implementation to the expected rate if rapid access to EEG was unavailable.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients underwent a total of 118 Rapid-EEG studies (10 with seizure, 18 with highly epileptiform patterns, 90 with slow/normal activity). Eighty-one studies (69%), including 9 of 10 studies that detected seizures, occurred after-hours when EEG was previously unavailable. Based on historical practice patterns, we estimated that Rapid-EEG potentially obviated transfer for LTM in 31 of 33 patients (94%); both completed transfers occurred before the transition to tele-EEG review.

SIGNIFICANCE

Rapid access to EEG led to the detection of seizures that would otherwise have been missed and reduced inter-hospital transfers for LTM. We estimate that the reduction in inter-hospital transportation costs alone would be in excess of $39,000 ($1,274 per patient). Point-of-care EEG systems may support a hub-and-spoke model for managing non-convulsive seizures (similar to that utilized in this study and analogous to existing acute stroke infrastructures), with increased EEG capacity at community hospitals and tele-EEG interpretation by specialists at academic hospitals that can accept transfers for LTM.

Big data and predictive analytics in neurocritical care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe predictive data and workflow in the intensive care unit when managing neurologically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the era of Big Data in medicine, intensive critical care units are data-rich environments. Neurocritical care adds another layer of data with advanced multimodal monitoring to prevent secondary brain injury from ischemia, tissue hypoxia, and a cascade of ongoing metabolic events. A step closer toward personalized medicine is the application of multimodal monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics, bran oxygenation, brain metabolism, and electrophysiologic indices, all of which have complex and dynamic interactions. These data are acquired and visualized using different tools and monitors facing multiple challenges toward the goal of the optimal decision support system. In this review, we highlight some of the predictive data used to diagnose, treat, and prognosticate the neurologically ill patients. We describe information management in neurocritical care units including data acquisition, wrangling, analysis, and visualization.

Rapid Handheld Continuous Electroencephalogram (EEG) Has the Potential to Detect Delirium in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Delirium-related biochemical derangements lead to electrical changes that can be detected in electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns followed by behavioral signs and symptoms. Studies using limited lead EEG show a large difference between patients with and without delirium while discriminating delirium from other causes. Handheld rapid EEG devices may be capable of detecting delirium before symptom onset, thus providing an objective physiological method to detect delirium when it is most amenable to interventions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the potential for rapid EEG to detect waveform pattern changes consistent with delirium status.

METHODS

This prospective exploratory pilot study used a correlational design and mixed models to explore the relationships between handheld portable EEG data and delirium status.

RESULTS

While being under powered minimized opportunities to detect statistical differences in EEG-derived ratios using spectral density analysis, sleep-to-wake ratios tended to be higher in patients with delirium.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited lead EEG may be useful in predicting adverse outcomes and risk for delirium in older critically ill patients. Although this population is at the highest risk for mortality, delirium is not easily identified by current clinical assessments. Therefore, further investigation of limited lead EEG for delirium detection is warranted.

Rapid Response EEG: Current State and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To critically appraise the literature on the application, methods, and advances in emergency electroencephalography (EEG).

RECENT FINDINGS

The development of rapid EEG (rEEG) technologies and other reduced montage approaches, along with advances in machine learning over the past decade, has increased the rate and access to EEG acquisition. These achievements have made EEG in the emergency setting a practical diagnostic technique for detecting seizures, suspected nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), altered mental status, stroke, and in the setting of sedation. Growing evidence supports using EEG to expedite medical decision-making in the setting of suspected acute neurological injury. This review covers approaches to acquiring EEG in the emergency setting in the adult and pediatric populations. We also cover the clinical impact of this data, the time associated with emergency EEG, and the costs of acquiring EEG in these settings. Finally, we discuss the advances in artificial intelligence for rapid electrophysiological interpretation.

Update on neurological symptoms in patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2

Novel coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) is the latest and most intense epidemic, which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). In addition to causing respiratory symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 can have severe effects on the nervous system. Clinically, COVID-19 patients have been reported ranging from mild hypogeusia and hyposmia to severe neurological disorders, such as encephalopathy, encephalitis, strokes, and seizures syndrome. However, the pathological mechanisms of this SARS-CoV-2 neuro aggressiveness remain unclear, so it is of great significance to explore the neurological effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To facilitate clinicians to timely recognize the manifestations of COVID-19 patients with neurological injury and timely treatment, the author hereby reviews the latest research progress in the possible pathways, clinical manifestations, and pathogenesis of COVID-19 patients with nerve injury.

Electrographic Seizure Detection by Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit Nurses via Bedside Real-Time Quantitative EEG

Objective

Our primary objective was to determine the performance of real-time neuroscience intensive care unit (neuro-ICU) nurse interpretation of quantitative EEG (qEEG) at the bedside for seizure detection. Secondary objectives included determining nurse time to seizure detection and assessing factors that influenced nurse accuracy.

Methods

Nurses caring for neuro-ICU patients undergoing continuous EEG (cEEG) were trained using a 1-hour qEEG panel (rhythmicity spectrogram and amplitude-integrated EEG) bedside display. Nurses' hourly interpretations were compared with post hoc cEEG review by 2 neurophysiologists as the gold standard. Diagnostic performance, time to seizure detection compared with standard of care (SOC), and effects of other factors on nurse accuracy were calculated.

Results

A total of 109 patients and 65 nurses were studied. Eight patients had seizures during the study period (7%). Nurse sensitivity and specificity for the detection of seizures were 74% and 92%, respectively. Mean nurse time to seizure detection was significantly shorter than SOC by 132 minutes (Cox proportional hazard ratio 6.96). Inaccurate nurse interpretation was associated with increased hours monitored and presence of brief rhythmic discharges.

Conclusions

This prospective study of real-time nurse interpretation of qEEG for seizure detection in neuro-ICU patients showed clinically adequate sensitivity and specificity. Time to seizure detection was less than that of SOC.

Trial Registration Information

Clinical trial registration number NCT02082873.

Classification of Evidence

This study provides Class I evidence that neuro-ICU nurse interpretation of qEEG detects seizures in adults with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 92% compared with traditional cEEG review.

Resident Use of EEG Cap System to Rule Out Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) requires an EEG for diagnosis and in many centers access may be limited. The authors aimed to test whether neurology residents can be trained to use and interpret full-montage EEGs using an EEG cap electrode system to detect NCSE while on-call.

METHODS

Neurology residents were trained to interpret EEG recordings using the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society critical care EEG terminology. Residents who achieved a score of 70% or higher in the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society certification test and attended a training session were eligible to use the EEG cap on-call with patients suspected of having NCSE. Residents' experience and interpretation of observed EEG patterns were evaluated using a questionnaire. Each EEG recording was independently reviewed by three epilepsy specialists to determine the interpretability of each study and whether the residents correctly identified the EEG patterns.

RESULTS

Sixteen residents undertook the training and 12 (75%) achieved a score of 70% or higher on the certification test. Seven of these residents performed 14 EEG cap studies between August 2017 and May 2018. The percent agreement between residents and electroencephalographers was 78.6% for EEG interpretability and 57.1% for description of EEG pattern. Residents did not miss any malignant patterns concerning for NCSE, which accounted for 1 of 14 EEGs but "overcalled" patterns as malignant in 3 of 14 recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that neurology residents can be taught to perform and interpret EEGs using a cap system to monitor for NCSE. Additional training will help improve EEG interpretation and sensitivity.

Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Rapid Response Electroencephalography: The DECIDE Multicenter Prospective Observational Clinical Study

OBJECTIVES

To measure the diagnostic accuracy, timeliness, and ease of use of Ceribell rapid response electroencephalography. We assessed physicians' diagnostic assessments and treatment plans before and after rapid response electroencephalography assessment. Primary outcomes were changes in physicians' diagnostic and therapeutic decision making and their confidence in these decisions based on the use of the rapid response electroencephalography system. Secondary outcomes were time to electroencephalography, setup time, ease of use, and quality of electroencephalography data.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter nonrandomized observational study.

SETTING

ICUs in five academic hospitals in the United States.

SUBJECTS

Patients with encephalopathy suspected of having nonconvulsive seizures and physicians evaluating these patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Physician bedside assessment of sonified electroencephalography (30 s from each hemisphere) and visual electroencephalography (60 s) using rapid response electroencephalography.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Physicians (29 fellows or residents, eight attending neurologists) evaluated 181 ICU patients; complete clinical and electroencephalography data were available in 164 patients (average 58.6 ± 18.7 yr old, 45% females). Relying on rapid response electroencephalography information at the bedside improved the sensitivity (95% CI) of physicians' seizure diagnosis from 77.8% (40.0%, 97.2%) to 100% (66.4%, 100%) and the specificity (95% CI) of their diagnosis from 63.9% (55.8%, 71.4%) to 89% (83.0%, 93.5%). Physicians' confidence in their own diagnosis and treatment plan were also improved. Time to electroencephalography (median [interquartile range]) was 5 minutes (4-10 min) with rapid response electroencephalography while the conventional electroencephalography was delayed by several hours (median [interquartile range] delay = 239 minutes [134-471 min] [p < 0.0001 using Wilcoxon signed rank test]). The device was rated as easy to use (mean ± SD: 4.7 ± 0.6 [1 = difficult, 5 = easy]) and was without serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid response electroencephalography enabled timely and more accurate assessment of patients in the critical care setting. The use of rapid response electroencephalography may be clinically beneficial in the assessment of patients with high suspicion for nonconvulsive seizures and status epilepticus.

Continuous Electroencephalographic Training for Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit Nurses: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Use of continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring has more than doubled at our institution for the last 4 years. Although intensive care unit cEEG is reviewed remotely by board-certified epileptologists every 4 to 6 hours, there are inherent delays between occurrence, recognition, and treatment of epileptiform activity. Neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) nurses are uniquely positioned to monitor cEEG in real time yet do not receive formal training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an education program to teach nurses to monitor cEEG, identify a burst suppression pattern, and measure the duration of suppression.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of pretest and posttest data. All NSICU nurses (40) were invited to complete the pretest (PT-0), with 25 participating. Learning style/preference, demographics, comfort with cEEG, and knowledge of EEG fundamentals were assessed. A convenience cohort of NSICU nurses (13) were selected to undergo EEG training. Posttests evaluating EEG fundamental knowledge were completed immediately after training (PT-1), at 3 months (PT-3), and at 6 months (PT-6). The cohort also completed a burst suppression module after the training, which assessed ability to quantify the duration of suppression.

RESULTS

Mean cohort test scores significantly improved after the training (P < .001). All nurses showed improvement in test scores, and 76.9% passed PT-1 (a score of 80% or higher). Reported mean comfort level with EEG also significantly improved after the training (P = .001). There was no significant difference between mean cohort scores between PT-1, PT-3, and PT-6 (all 88.6%; P = 1.000). Mean cohort score from the bust suppression module was 73%, with test scores ranging from 31% to 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

NSICU nurses can be taught fundamentals of cEEG, to identify a burst suppression pattern, and to quantify the duration of suppression. Further research is needed to determine whether this knowledge can be translated into clinical competency and affect patient care.

Severe Neurologic Complications of SARS-CoV-2

Purpose of Review

This review presents an overview of the known neurocritical care complications of severe acute respiratory virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We present readers with a review of the literature of severe neurologic complications of SARS-CoV-2 and cases from our institution to illustrate these conditions.

Recent Findings

Neurologic manifestations are being increasingly recognized in the literature. Some patients can have severe neurologic manifestations, though the true prevalence is unknown.

Summary

Severe neurologic complications of COVID-19 include large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, encephalitis, myelitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, status epilepticus, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. These conditions can manifest in COVID-19 patients even in the absence of risk factors and must be promptly identified as they can have a high mortality if left untreated.

Factors associated with resistance to benzodiazepines in status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors related to benzodiazepine (BZD) resistance in status epilepticus (SE) with a focus on their relationship with the etiology of the episode.

METHODS

All SE cases in patients aged >16 years treated with BZDs were prospectively collected in our center from February 2011 to April 2019. The registry included demographics, SE type and etiology, the timing and duration of BZD administration, and the outcome. In total, 371 episodes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median age at SE onset was 61.3 years; the most frequent etiology was acute symptomatic (55.8%). SE with prominent motor symptoms occurred in 63.3%. Median time to BZD administration was 2 h. We studied the correlation between two-time variables: time from SE onset to BZD administration and time from BZD administration to resolution of SE (response); we observed that timely administration correlated with a faster response in patients with prominent motor symptoms (p = 0.017), SE due to a chronic structural cerebral lesion (p = 0.004), and patients with a history of seizures (p = 0.013). In these subgroups (prominent motor symptoms or chronic structural lesion) BZD administration within the first 4.5 h was highly associated with shorter post-BZD SE duration (p < 0.001).

SIGNIFICANCE

The relationship between prompt BZD administration and subsequent duration of SE was found to depend to some extent on the etiology of the episode: patients with chronic structural lesions and those with previous epilepsy responded faster to BZDs. Semiology may have also its impact, as the presence of prominent motor symptoms showed also a faster response.

Structure and Outcomes of Educational Programs for Training Non-electroencephalographers in Performing and Screening Adult EEG: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively and quantitatively summarize curricula, teaching methods, and effectiveness of educational programs for training bedside care providers (non-experts) in the performance and screening of adult electroencephalography (EEG) for nonconvulsive seizures and other patterns.

METHODS

PRISMA methodological standards were followed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, WOS, Scopus, and MedEdPORTAL databases were searched from inception until February 26, 2020 with no restrictions. Abstract and full-text review was completed in duplicate. Studies were included if they were original research; involved non-experts performing, troubleshooting, or screening adult EEG; and provided qualitative descriptions of curricula and teaching methods and/or quantitative assessment of non-experts (vs gold standard EEG performance by neurodiagnostic technologists or interpretation by neurophysiologists). Data were extracted in duplicate. A content analysis and a meta-narrative review were performed.

RESULTS

Of 2430 abstracts, 35 studies were included. Sensitivity and specificity of seizure identification varied from 38 to 100% and 65 to 100% for raw EEG; 40 to 93% and 38 to 95% for quantitative EEG, and 95 to 100% and 65 to 85% for sonified EEG, respectively. Non-expert performance of EEG resulted in statistically significant reduced delay (86 min, p < 0.0001; 196 min, p < 0.0001; 667 min, p < 0.005) in EEG completion and changes in management in approximately 40% of patients. Non-experts who were trained included physicians, nurses, neurodiagnostic technicians, and medical students. Numerous teaching methods were utilized and often combined, with instructional and hands-on training being most common.

CONCLUSIONS

Several different bedside providers can be educated to perform and screen adult EEG, particularly for the purpose of diagnosing nonconvulsive seizures. While further rigorous research is warranted, this review demonstrates several potential bridges by which EEG may be integrated into the care of critically ill patients.

A Fast-Track Care by a Nursing Case Management Concept Improved Status Epilepticus Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency neurological condition, which is life-threatening, results in high morbidity and mortality rates, and needs to be diagnosed and promptly cared for. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the SE fast-track care using a nursing case management concept on SE outcomes.

METHODS

Quasi-experimental study conducted in adult patients with SE admitted in 15 emergency and intensive critical/intermediate care wards. SE outcomes were evaluated and compared between preintervention and postintervention.

RESULTS

Time to treatment was reduced from 30 minutes to 3.5 minutes (P < .001). Similarly, the seizure control rate increased from 65.7% to 94.4% (P = .009). The mortality rate was reduced but did not reach statistical significance (8.6% vs 0%; P = .115). The intervention also reduced average waiting time for receiving antiepileptic drugs from the pharmacy department from 13.09 minutes to < 1 minute.

CONCLUSION

The development of the fast-track care system for SE patients by nursing case management is at the core of management for coordinating multidisciplinary teams. This can improve outcomes by reducing the time to diagnosis and treatment time, therefore reducing mortality rates in SE patients.

Central Nervous System Manifestations Associated with COVID-19

Purpose of Review

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global health crisis of our time. The disease arises from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on host cells for its internalization. COVID-19 has a wide range of respiratory symptoms from mild to severe and affects several other organs, increasing the complexity of the treatment. There is accumulating evidence to suggest that SARS-CoV-2 can target the nervous system. In this review, we provide an account of the COVID-19 central nervous system (CNS) manifestations.

Recent Findings

A broad spectrum of the CNS manifestations including headache, impaired consciousness, delirium, loss of smell and taste, encephalitis, seizures, strokes, myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neurogenic respiratory failure, encephalopathy, silent hypoxemia, generalized myoclonus, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and Kawasaki syndrome has been reported in patients with COVID-19.

Summary

CNS manifestations associated with COVID-19 should be considered in clinical practice. There is a need for modification of current protocols and standing orders to provide better care for COVID-19 patients presenting with neurological symptoms.

Monitoring the Burden of Seizures and Highly Epileptiform Patterns in Critical Care with a Novel Machine Learning Method

INTRODUCTION

Current electroencephalography (EEG) practice relies on interpretation by expert neurologists, which introduces diagnostic and therapeutic delays that can impact patients' clinical outcomes. As EEG practice expands, these experts are becoming increasingly limited resources. A highly sensitive and specific automated seizure detection system would streamline practice and expedite appropriate management for patients with possible nonconvulsive seizures. We aimed to test the performance of a recently FDA-cleared machine learning method (Claritγ, Ceribell Inc.) that measures the burden of seizure activity in real time and generates bedside alerts for possible status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified adult patients (n = 353) who underwent evaluation of possible seizures with Rapid Response EEG system (Rapid-EEG, Ceribell Inc.). Automated detection of seizure activity and seizure burden throughout a recording (calculated as the percentage of ten-second epochs with seizure activity in any 5-min EEG segment) was performed with Claritγ, and various thresholds of seizure burden were tested (≥ 10% indicating ≥ 30 s of seizure activity in the last 5 min, ≥ 50% indicating ≥ 2.5 min of seizure activity, and ≥ 90% indicating ≥ 4.5 min of seizure activity and triggering a SE alert). The sensitivity and specificity of Claritγ's real-time seizure burden measurements and SE alerts were compared to the majority consensus of at least two expert neurologists.

RESULTS

Majority consensus of neurologists labeled the 353 EEGs as normal or slow activity (n = 249), highly epileptiform patterns (HEP, n = 87), or seizures [n = 17, nine longer than 5 min (e.g., SE), and eight shorter than 5 min]. The algorithm generated a SE alert (≥ 90% seizure burden) with 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity. The sensitivity and specificity of various thresholds for seizure burden during EEG recordings for detecting patients with seizures were 100% and 82% for ≥ 50% seizure burden and 88% and 60% for ≥ 10% seizure burden. Of the 179 EEG recordings in which the algorithm detected no seizures, seizures were identified by the expert reviewers in only two cases, indicating a negative predictive value of 99%.

DISCUSSION

Claritγ detected SE events with high sensitivity and specificity, and it demonstrated a high negative predictive value for distinguishing nonepileptiform activity from seizure and highly epileptiform activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Ruling out seizures accurately in a large proportion of cases can help prevent unnecessary or aggressive over-treatment in critical care settings, where empiric treatment with antiseizure medications is currently prevalent. Claritγ's high sensitivity for SE and high negative predictive value for cases without epileptiform activity make it a useful tool for triaging treatment and the need for urgent neurological consultation.

Epileptic Seizures in Critically Ill Patients: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes

Epileptic seizures in critically ill patients represent a major source of concern, because they are associated with significant mortality and morbidity rates. Despite recent advances that have enabled a better understanding of the global epidemiology of this entity, epileptic seizures in critically ill patients remain associated with a high degree of uncertainty and numerous questions remain unanswered. The present Special Issue aims to invite authors to contribute original research articles as well as review articles related to all aspects of epileptic seizures in critically ill patients, diagnosis, management, and outcomes.

EEG findings in acutely ill patients investigated for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: A small case series preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

Acute encephalopathy may occur in COVID-19-infected patients. We investigated whether medically indicated EEGs performed in acutely ill patients under investigation (PUIs) for COVID-19 report epileptiform abnormalities and whether these are more prevalent in COVID-19 positive than negative patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, adult COVID-19 inpatient PUIs underwent EEGs for acute encephalopathy and/or seizure-like events. PUIs had 8-channel headband EEGs (Ceribell; 20 COVID-19 positive, 6 COVID-19 negative); 2 more COVID-19 patients had routine EEGs. Overall, 26 Ceribell EEGs, 4 routine and 7 continuous EEG studies were reviewed. EEGs were interpreted by board-certified clinical neurophysiologists (n = 16). EEG findings were correlated with demographic data, clinical presentation and history, and medication usage. Fisher's exact test was used.

RESULTS

We included 28 COVID-19 PUIs (30-83 years old), of whom 22 tested positive (63.6% males) and 6 tested negative (33.3% male). The most common indications for EEG, among COVID-19-positive vs COVID-19-negative patients, respectively, were new onset encephalopathy (68.2% vs 33.3%) and seizure-like events (14/22, 63.6%; 2/6, 33.3%), even among patients without prior history of seizures (11/17, 64.7%; 2/6, 33.3%). Sporadic epileptiform discharges (EDs) were present in 40.9% of COVID-19-positive and 16.7% of COVID-19-negative patients; frontal sharp waves were reported in 8/9 (88.9%) of COVID-19-positive patients with EDs and in 1/1 of COVID-19-negative patient with EDs. No electrographic seizures were captured, but 19/22 COVID-19-positive and 6/6 COVID-19-negative patients were given antiseizure medications and/or sedatives before the EEG.

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first preliminary report of EDs in the EEG of acutely ill COVID-19-positive patients with encephalopathy or suspected clinical seizures. EDs are relatively common in this cohort and typically appear as frontal sharp waves. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the potential direct or indirect effects of COVID-19 on activating epileptic activity.