1
|
Kung H, Yu J. Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e216. [PMID: 36814688 PMCID: PMC9939368 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with a high rate of recurrence and a dismal 5-year survival rate. Contributing to the poor prognosis of PDAC is the lack of early detection, a complex network of signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms, a dense and desmoplastic stroma, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. A recent shift toward a neoadjuvant approach to treating PDAC has been sparked by the numerous benefits neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has to offer compared with upfront surgery. However, certain aspects of NAT against PDAC, including the optimal regimen, the use of radiotherapy, and the selection of patients that would benefit from NAT, have yet to be fully elucidated. This review describes the major signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in PDAC initiation and progression in addition to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of PDAC. We then review current guidelines, ongoing research, and future research directions on the use of NAT based on randomized clinical trials and other studies. Finally, the current use of and research regarding targeted therapy for PDAC are examined. This review bridges the molecular understanding of PDAC with its clinical significance, development of novel therapies, and shifting directions in treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng‐Chung Kung
- Krieger School of Arts and SciencesJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jun Yu
- Departments of Medicine and OncologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cui M, Shoucair S, Liao Q, Qiu X, Kinny-Köster B, Habib JR, Ghabi EM, Wang J, Shin EJ, Leng SX, Ali SZ, Thompson ED, Zimmerman JW, Shubert CR, Lafaro KJ, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, Zheng L, He J, Zhao Y, Wolfgang CL, Yu J. Cancer-cell-derived sialylated IgG as a novel biomarker for predicting poor pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Int J Surg 2023; 109:99-106. [PMID: 36799816 PMCID: PMC10389326 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly applied in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, accurate prediction of therapeutic response to NAT remains a pressing clinical challenge. Cancer-cell-derived sialylated immunoglobulin G (SIA-IgG) was previously identified as a prognostic biomarker in PDAC. This study aims to explore whether SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve fine needle aspirate (FNA) biopsy specimens could predict the pathological response (PR) to NAT for PDAC. METHODS Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided FNA biopsy specimens prior to NAT were prospectively obtained from 72 patients with PDAC at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. SIA-IgG expression of PDAC specimens was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Associations between SIA-IgG expression and PR, as well as patient prognosis, were analyzed. A second cohort enrolling surgically resected primary tumor specimens from 79 patients with PDAC was used to validate the prognostic value of SIA-IgG expression. RESULTS SIA-IgG was expressed in 58.3% of treatment-naïve FNA biopsies. Positive SIA-IgG expression at diagnosis was associated with unfavorable PR and can serve as an independent predictor of PR. The sensitivity and specificity of SIA-IgG expression in FNA specimens in predicting an unfavorable PR were 63.9% and 80.6%, respectively. Both positive SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve FNA specimens and high SIA-IgG expression in surgically resected primary tumor specimens were significantly associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS Assessment of SIA-IgG on FNA specimens prior to NAT may help predict PR for PDAC. Additionally, SIA-IgG expression in treatment-naïve FNA specimens and surgically resected primary tumor specimens were predictive of the prognosis for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Cui
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sami Shoucair
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Quan Liao
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Xiaoyan Qiu
- Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Joseph R. Habib
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Elie M. Ghabi
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christopher R. Shubert
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Kelly J. Lafaro
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Richard A. Burkhart
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - William R. Burns
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Jin He
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
| | - Yupei Zhao
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Jun Yu
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdelrahman AM, Goenka AH, Alva-Ruiz R, Yonkus JA, Leiting JL, Graham RP, Merrell KW, Thiels CA, Hallemeier CL, Warner SG, Haddock MG, Grotz TE, Tran NH, Smoot RL, Ma WW, Cleary SP, McWilliams RR, Nagorney DM, Halfdanarson TR, Kendrick ML, Truty MJ. FDG-PET Predicts Neoadjuvant Therapy Response and Survival in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:1023-1032.e3. [PMID: 36075389 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is used in borderline resectable/locally advanced (BR/LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Anatomic imaging (CT/MRI) poorly predicts response, and biochemical (CA 19-9) markers are not useful (nonsecretors/nonelevated) in many patients. Pathologic response highly predicts survival post-NAT, but is only known postoperatively. Because metabolic imaging (FDG-PET) reveals primary tumor viability, this study aimed to evaluate our experience with preoperative FDG-PET in patients with BR/LA PDAC in predicting NAT response and survival. METHODS We reviewed all patients with resected BR/LA PDAC who underwent NAT with FDG-PET within 60 days of resection. Pre- and post-NAT metabolic (FDG-PET) and biochemical (CA 19-9) responses were dichotomized in addition to pathologic responses. We compared post-NAT metabolic and biochemical responses as preoperative predictors of pathologic responses and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 202 eligible patients. Post-NAT, 58% of patients had optimization of CA 19-9 levels. Major metabolic and pathologic responses were present in 51% and 38% of patients, respectively. Median RFS and OS times were 21 and 48.7 months, respectively. Metabolic response was superior to biochemical response in predicting pathologic response (area under the curve, 0.86 vs 0.75; P<.001). Metabolic response was the only univariate preoperative predictor of OS (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.40), and was highly correlated (P=.001) with pathologic response as opposed to biochemical response alone. After multivariate adjustment, metabolic response was the single largest independent preoperative predictor (P<.001) for pathologic response (odds ratio, 43.2; 95% CI, 16.9-153.2), RFS (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6), and OS (hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.1-0.4). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with post-NAT resected BR/LA PDAC, FDG-PET highly predicts pathologic response and survival, superior to biochemical responses alone. Given the poor ability of anatomic imaging or biochemical markers to assess NAT responses in these patients, FDG-PET is a preoperative metric of NAT efficacy, thereby allowing potential therapeutic alterations and surgical treatment decisions. We suggest that FDG-PET should be an adjunct and recommended modality during the NAT phase of care for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ajit H Goenka
- Division of Nuclear Medicine Radiology, Department of Radiology
| | - Roberto Alva-Ruiz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | - Jennifer A Yonkus
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | | | - Rondell P Graham
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology
| | | | | | | | - Susanne G Warner
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | | | - Travis E Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | - Nguyen H Tran
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | - Wen Wee Ma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | - Robert R McWilliams
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - David M Nagorney
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery
| | | | | | - Mark J Truty
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang S, Zhang Y, Hua Y, Cui M, Wang M, Gao J, Liu Q, Liao Q. GREM1 is a novel serum diagnostic marker and potential therapeutic target for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2022; 12:968610. [PMID: 36091126 PMCID: PMC9458890 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.968610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant neoplasm with rising incidence worldwide. Gremlin 1 (GREM1), a regulator of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling, fine-tunes extensive biological processes, including organ morphology, cellular metabolism, and multiple pathological developments. The roles of GREM1 in PDAC remain unknown. Methods Varieties of public databases and online software were employed to analyze the expressions at transcription and protein levels of GREM1 in multiple malignant neoplasms including PDAC, and in addition, its potential pro-tumoral functions in PDAC were further evaluated. A total of 340 serum samples of pancreatic disease, including PDAC, low-grade malignant pancreatic neoplasm, benign pancreatic neoplasm, pancreatitis, and 132 healthy controls, were collected to detect GREM1. The roles of serum GREM1 in the diagnosis and prediction of survival of PDAC after radical resection were also analyzed. Results Bioinformatics analyses revealed that GREM1 was overexpressed in PDAC and predicted a poorer survival in PDAC. A higher protein level of GREM1 in PDAC correlated with stroma formation and immunosuppression by recruiting varieties of immunosuppressive cells, including T regulatory cells (Tregs), M2 macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and exhaustion T cells into the tumor microenvironment. A higher level of serum GREM1 was observed in PDAC patients, compared to healthy control (p < 0.001). Serum GREM1 had a good diagnostic value (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.718, p < 0.001), and its combination with carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) achieved a better diagnostic efficacy (AUC = 0.914, p < 0.001), compared to CA199 alone. The cutoff value was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and PDAC patients were divided into two groups of low and high GREM1. Logistic analyses showed serum GREM1 positively correlated with tumor size (hazard ratio (HR) = 7.097, p = 0.032) and histopathological grades (HR = 2.898, p = 0.014). High-level serum GREM1 (1,117.8 pg/ml) showed a shorter postoperative survival (p = 0.0394). Conclusion Higher intra-tumoral expression of GREM1 in PDAC contributes to tumor stroma and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, presenting its therapeutic potential. High-level serum GREM1 predicts poorer survival after resection. A combination of serum CA199 and GREM1 shows a stronger diagnostic efficacy in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sen Yang
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yalu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - Yuze Hua
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Cui
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Mengyi Wang
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junyi Gao
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qiaofei Liu
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Qiaofei Liu, ; Quan Liao,
| | - Quan Liao
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Qiaofei Liu, ; Quan Liao,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yin L, Pu N, Thompson E, Miao Y, Wolfgang C, Yu J. Improved Assessment of Response Status in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy using Somatic Mutations and Liquid Biopsy Analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:740-748. [PMID: 33082211 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate somatic mutations, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and find their associations with outcome. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Thirty-six patients with PDAC with pCR were identified from 2009 to 2017. Macrodissection was performed on resected specimens to isolate DNA from 332 regions of interest including fibrosis, normal duct, normal parenchyma, and undefined ductal cells (UDCs). Cell-free DNA and CTCs were also extracted. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect mutations of KRAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4, TP53, GNAS, and BRAF. RESULTS KRAS mutation was detected in UDCs and fibrosis while SMAD4, TP53, and GNAS were only seen in UDCs. Patients with TP53 mutation showed relatively worse overall survival (HR, 3.596, 95% CI, 0.855-15.130; P = 0.081). Five patients available for CTCs data were all positive for CTCs and seven of 16 patients with pCR were detected with ctDNA at surgery. We proposed a new concept of regression assessment combining genomic analysis of resected specimens and liquid biopsy data for PDAC, namely, molecular complete response (mCR). Three of six patients with mCR recurred as compared with six in 15 non-mCR patients. Seven of 15 non-mCR patients died during follow-up, while there was only one in six patients with mCR. CONCLUSIONS This study first reports that somatic mutations, CTCs, and ctDNA existed even in patients with PDAC with pCR to NAT, which could possibly predict early recurrence and reduced survival. The current regression evaluation system of PDAC needs to be reassessed at a molecular level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingdi Yin
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ning Pu
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Elizabeth Thompson
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yi Miao
- Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Christopher Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
- Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jun Yu
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cacciato Insilla A, Vivaldi C, Giordano M, Vasile E, Cappelli C, Kauffmann E, Napoli N, Falcone A, Boggi U, Campani D. Tumor Regression Grading Assessment in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX: Interobserver Agreement and Prognostic Implications. Front Oncol 2020; 10:64. [PMID: 32117724 PMCID: PMC7025535 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy represents an increasingly used strategy in pancreatic cancer, and this means that more pancreatic resections need to be evaluated for therapy effect. Several grading systems have been proposed for the histological assessment of tumor regression in pre-treated patients with pancreatic cancer, but issues like practical application, level of agreement and prognostic significance are still debated. To date, a standardized and widely accepted score has not been established yet. In this study, two pathologists with expertise in pancreatic cancer used 4 of the most frequently reported systems (College of American Pathologists, Evans, MD Anderson, and Hartman) to evaluate tumor regression in 29 locally advanced pancreatic cancers previously treated with modified FOLFIRINOX regimen, to establish the level of agreement between pathologists and to determine their potential prognostic value. Cases were additionally evaluated with a fifth grading system inspired to the Dworak score, normally used for colo-rectal cancer, to identify an alternative, relevant option. Results obtained for current grading systems showed different levels of agreement, and they often proved to be very subjective and inaccurate. In addition, no significant correlation was observed with survival. Interestingly, Dworak score showed a higher degree of concordance and a significant correlation with overall survival in individual assessments. These data reflect the need to re-evaluate grading systems for pancreatic cancer to establish a more reproducible and clinically relevant score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cacciato Insilla
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Caterina Vivaldi
- Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mirella Giordano
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Enrico Vasile
- Division of Medical Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carla Cappelli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Kauffmann
- Department of Transplant and General Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Niccolò Napoli
- Department of Transplant and General Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alfredo Falcone
- Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Transplant and General Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniela Campani
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|