Can Adults Recognize Concussion Symptoms? A Critical Review of Empirical Research Using the Rosenbaum Concussion Knowledge and Attitudes Survey

Question Format Matters: Do Athletes Really Know the Signs and Symptoms of a Sport-Related Concussion?

Authors of previous studies commonly used a multiselect checklist method to assess an athlete's ability to recognize true sport-related concussion (SRC) signs and symptoms (S&S) among incorrect distractor options. However, this may overinflate the evaluation of participants' knowledge because the multiselect method does not test athletes' ability to retrieve knowledge from their long-term memory. To examine this hypothesis, we sent an online survey to registered members of the Japan Lacrosse Association (n = 8530) to assess differences in reported SRC S&S by open-ended-question and multiselect formats. We also evaluated whether previous exposure to SRC education and a history of SRC influenced athletes' SRC S&S knowledge. The numbers and proportions of responses were calculated using descriptive statistics. The Pearson correlation was calculated to analyze the relationship between scores from the 2 question formats. Unpaired-samples t tests were conducted to compare the mean scores for each question format by previous SRC education and history of diagnosed SRC. Odds ratios were computed to express the relationship between the proportion of correct answers by question format per symptom. The response rate of the survey was 35.9% (n = 3065), and scores from the 2 question formats were correlated (r = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.37; P < .001). For both question formats, athletes with previous exposure to SRC education and a history of SRC had a greater number of correct answers; however, the mean differences were trivial. Researchers and clinicians should acknowledge the difference between multiselect (recognition) and open-ended (free recall) formats when assessing one's understanding of SRC and managing athletes with a suspected SRC.

Sports fans, wagering, and concussion knowledge: implications for injury nondisclosure

OBJECTIVE

Athletes perceive sports fans as a source of concussion nondisclosure pressure. Sports fans are exposed to injury depictions from the media that could lead them to underestimate its seriousness. This study examined the concussion knowledge of non-sports fans, sports fans, and wagering sports fans, as knowledge is a modifiable factor that can influence injury disclosure.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 443 Australian adults completed an online survey.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

MAIN MEASURES

Self-rated and actual concussion knowledge (the Rosenbaum Concussion Knowledge and Attitudes Survey; RoCKAS).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the concussion knowledge of self-identified sports (n = 157) and non-sports (n = 286) fans; but sports fans rated their knowledge as significantly higher than non-sports fans (p < .05). Wagering sports fans (n = 24) had significantly less concussion knowledge than non-wagering sports fans (η2 = .03, small effect).

DISCUSSION

Athletes who feel nondisclosure pressure from sports fans may be influenced by people with incomplete concussion knowledge, particularly wagering sports fans. Sports fans over-estimated their knowledge, and this could contribute to the nondisclosure pressure felt by athletes. Programmes to increase injury disclosure by athletes should take these factors into consideration.