Clinical Implications of Variant ALK FISH Rearrangement Patterns

Concordance of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Detection of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) and Ros Proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) Gene Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 4.5-Year Experience Highlighting Challenges and Pitfalls

CONTEXT.—

ALK and ROS1 rearrangements are essential biomarkers to be tested in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. While D5F3 Ventana assay is a companion diagnostic for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-targeted therapy, immunohistochemistry is only a screening tool for detecting ROS1 rearrangement. Confirmation by cytogenetic or molecular techniques is necessary.

OBJECTIVE.—

To evaluate the utility of ALK and ROS1 fluorescence in situ hybridization as a complement to immunohistochemistry in routine predictive biomarker testing algorithms.

DESIGN.—

The study was ambispective, spanning 4.5 years during which lung adenocarcinoma samples were subjected to EGFR mutation testing by real-time polymerase chain reaction and ALK/ROS1 rearrangement testing by immunohistochemistry (Ventana D5F3 assay for anaplastic lymphoma kinase protein; manual assay with D4D6 clone for Ros proto-oncogene 1 protein). Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in all anaplastic lymphoma kinase equivocal and Ros proto-oncogene 1 immunopositive cases.

RESULTS.—

Of 1874 samples included, EGFR mutations were detected in 27% (481 of 1796). Anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunohistochemistry was positive in 10% (174 of 1719) and equivocal in 3% (58 of 1719) of samples tested. ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization showed 81% (77 of 95) concordance with immunohistochemistry. Ros proto-oncogene 1 immunopositivity was noted in 13% (190 of 1425) of cases, with hybridization-confirmed rearrangements in 19.3% (26 of 135) of samples, all of which showed diffuse, strong- to moderate-intensity, cytoplasmic staining in tumor cells. Ros proto-oncogene 1 protein overexpression without rearrangement was significantly common in EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged adenocarcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunostaining is a robust method for ALK-rearrangement testing, with fluorescence in situ hybridization adding value in the rare equivocal stained case. ROS1-rearrangement testing is more cost-effective if immunohistochemistry is followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization after excluding EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged adenocarcinomas.

Discordant ALK Status in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Detailed Reevaluation Comparing IHC, FISH, and NGS Analyses

ALK detection was performed on 2813 EGFR-unmutated NSCLC cases by simultaneous use of immunohistochemistry (VENTANA® anti-ALK D5F3, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Rotkreuz, Switzerland) and fluorescence in situ hybridization with the ALK break apart and the ALK/EML4 fusion probe (ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany). A total of 33 cases were positive discordant (FISH-positive, IHC-negative) and 17 cases were negative discordant (FISH-negative, IHC-positive). This study's aim was to reevaluate the methods used and compare discordant samples to positive concordant samples in order to ellucidate the differences. FISH signal variants were examined and compared. Positive discordant cases featured one pattern of ALK rearrangement in 41.4%, two patterns in 48.3%, and three patterns in 10.3% of analysed samples, with a higher variability of detected patterns and a higher number of ALK copy gains. Positive concordant cases displayed one pattern of rearrangement in 82%, two patterns in 17.8%, and three patterns in 0.6% of analysed samples. The association between number of patterns and concordance/discordance was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Eleven positive discordant and two negative concordant cases underwent NGS analysis, which resulted in identification of ALK fusion in one positive discordant and two negative discordant cases. Positive protein expression regardless of FISH result correlated more with a positive NGS result compared to samples with a positive FISH result with negative protein expression. FISH analysis was able to detect atypical or heterogenous patterns of rearrangement in a proportion of cases with negative protein expression, which may be associated with more extensive genetic alterations rather than true ALK rearrangement.

A Robust FISH Assay to Detect FGFR2 Translocations in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients

FGFR fusions retaining the FGFR kinase domain are active kinases that are either overexpressed or constitutively activated throughout diverse cancer types. The presence of FGFR translocations enhances tumor cell proliferation and contributes to significant sensitivity to FGFR kinase inhibitors. FGFR2 as an actionable target in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) has been tested in many clinical trials. FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) and NGS (next-generation sequence) are well-known tools to investigate the translocations of FGFR with multiple or unknown translocation partners. A rapid and robust FISH assay was developed and validated to detect FGFR2 translocations from FFPE specimens in iCCA. The analytical performance of the FISH assay was evaluated for probe localization, probe sensitivity and specificity, and assay precision. Twenty-five archival FFPE specimens from local iCCA patients were tested for FGFR2 translocations. FISH results were correlated with that of NGS on some samples. Biallelic translocations and a novel FGFR2 translocation involving the partner gene, SHROOM3, t(4;10) (q21;q26), were identified in a local iCCA patient.

False positivity in break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization due to polyploidy

Background

In-situ hybridization (ISH) is a diagnostic tool in the detection of chromosomal anomalies, which has important implications for diagnosis, classification and prediction of cancer therapy in various diseases. Certain thresholds of number of cells showing an aberrant pattern are commonly used to declare a sample as positive for genomic rearrangements. The phenomenon of polyploidy can be misleading in the interpretation of break apart fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of cell size and ploidy on FISH results.

Methods

In sections of varying thickness of control liver tissue and non-small cell lung cancer cases, nuclear size was measured and the number of MET chromogenic ISH and ALK FISH (liver) or ALK and ROS1 FISH (lung cancer) signals was manually counted and quantified.

Results

In liver cell nuclei the number of FISH/chromogenic ISH signals increases with nuclear size related to physiological polyploidy and is related to section thickness. In non-small cell lung cancer cases tumour cells with higher ploidy levels and nuclear size have an increased chance of single signals. Furthermore, additional lung cancer samples with borderline ALK FISH results were examined with a commercial kit for rearrangements. No rearrangements could be demonstrated, proving a false positive ALK FISH result.

Conclusions

In case of polyploidy there is an increased likelihood of false positivity when using break apart FISH probes. Therefore, we state that prescribing one single cut-off in FISH is inappropriate. In polyploidy, the currently proposed cut-off should only be used with caution and the result should be confirmed by an additional technique.

Cell block-based RNA next generation sequencing for detection of gene fusions in lung adenocarcinoma: An institutional experience

OBJECTIVE

Targeted therapy is an important part of the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. Tests for EGFR mutation, ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK gene fusions are needed to make a treatment decision. These gene fusions are traditionally detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) or immunohistochemistry. In this study, we investigated whether gene fusions in pulmonary adenocarcinoma could be accurately detected by RNA next-generation sequencing (RNA-NGS) and whether cytology cell blocks could be used effectively for this test.

METHODS

Archived cytological specimens of lung adenocarcinoma submitted for RNA sequencing between 2019 and 2022 at Fox Chase Cancer Center were retrospectively retrieved. Hybrid capture-based targeted RNA next generation sequencing was used, which covers 507 fusion genes, including ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRKs, irrespective of their partner genes. DNA NGS, FISH and chromosomal microarray analysis were used to confirm the results of the RNA-NGS.

RESULTS

A total of 129 lung adenocarcinoma cytology specimens were submitted for molecular testing. Eight of 129 (6.2%) cases were excluded from RNA sequencing as their cell blocks contained inadequate numbers of tumour cells. One case (0.8%) failed to yield adequate RNA. The overall success rate was 93% (120/129). Ten of 120 (8.3%) cytology cases were positive for gene fusions, including 7 ALK, 2 ROS1 fusion genes, and 1 RET fusion gene. Twenty-two cell block cases were also tested for ALK fusion genes using FISH. However, 11 of 22 (50%) failed the testing due to inadequate material.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytology cell blocks can be used as the main source of material for molecular testing for lung cancer. Detection of gene fusions by RNA-based NGS on cell blocks is convenient and reliable in daily practice.

ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis with long-term treatment for organizing pneumonia: A case report

RATIONALE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes inflammation in various organs including the lungs. Pulmonary manifestations include inflammation of the pleura, vasculature, airway, and parenchyma, including interstitial lung disease (ILD). RA-organizing pneumonia (OP) is the third most common cause of RA-ILD. Cases of OP coexisting/complicated with lung cancer have been reported. Therefore, lung cancer can represent a diagnostic challenge, especially in patients with underlying pulmonary diseases including OP.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 81-year-old woman with a 12-year history of RA-OP underwent multiple transbronchial lung biopsies (TBLBs), all of which resulted in no malignant findings. She was treated with prednisolone (PSL) depending on the deteriorated infiltrations. At admission, chest computed tomography (CT) images showed exacerbation of left S8 consolidation on chest CT. Additionally, her RA activity was exacerbated, and PSL dose was increased to 30 mg/day, which resulted in improved dyspnea and consolidation. Accordingly, PSL dose was gradually decreased. However, 6 months later, when PSL dose was 11 mg/d, due to a worsening of consolidation and the joint symptoms of RA, PSL dose was increased to 20 mg/d and tacrolimus 2 mg/d was administered. 3 months after the increase in PSL dose, dyspnea improved and PSL dose was reduced to 15 mg/d; however, she was admitted to our hospital because of low back pain.

DIAGNOSIS

Spinal magnetic resonance imaging showed bone metastases in the third and fifth lumbar vertebrae, and lung cancer was suspected as the primary tumor on CT.

INTERVENTIONS

TBLB was performed on the left B8 infiltrate, which showed no evidence of malignancy in the previous TBLB.

OUTCOMES

Pathological examination of TBLB on the left B8 revealed an adenocarcinoma that was positive for anaplastic lymphoma kinase.

LESSONS

Physicians should be aware of the development of lung cancer in regions with OP, even after a partial response to corticosteroid therapy.

Targeting ALK Rearrangements in NSCLC: Current State of the Art

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be effectively treated with a variety of ALK-targeted drugs. After the approval of the first-generation ALK inhibitor crizotinib which achieved better results in prolonging the progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy, a number of next-generation ALK inhibitors have been developed including ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and ensartinib. Recently, a potent, third-generation ALK inhibitor, lorlatinib, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first-line treatment of ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC. These drugs have manageable toxicity profiles. Responses to ALK inhibitors are however often not durable, and acquired resistance can occur as on-target or off-target alterations. Studies are underway to explore the mechanisms of resistance and optimal treatment options beyond progression. Efforts have also been undertaken to develop further generations of ALK inhibitors. This review will summarize the current situation of targeting the ALK signaling pathway.

Molecular diagnosis in non-small-cell lung cancer: expert opinion on ALK and ROS1 testing

The effectiveness of targeted therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depends on the accurate determination of the genomic status of the tumour. For this reason, molecular analyses to detect genetic rearrangements in some genes (ie, ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK) have become standard in patients with advanced disease. Since immunohistochemistry is easier to implement and interpret, it is normally used as the screening procedure, while fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) is used to confirm the rearrangement and decide on ambiguous immunostainings. Although FISH is considered the most sensitive method for the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, the interpretation of results requires detailed guidelines. In this review, we discuss the various technologies available to evaluate ALK and ROS1 genomic rearrangements using these techniques. Other techniques such as real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing have been developed recently to evaluate ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangements, but some limitations prevent their full implementation in the clinical setting. Similarly, liquid biopsies have the potential to change the treatment of patients with advanced lung cancer, but further research is required before this technology can be applied in routine clinical practice. We discuss the technical requirements of laboratories in the light of quality assurance programmes. Finally, we review the recent updates made to the guidelines for the determination of molecular biomarkers in patients with NSCLC.

ALK Gene Rearrangements in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Concordance of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization, RNA In Situ Hybridization, and RNA Next-Generation Sequencing Testing

Introduction

The 2018 updated molecular testing guidelines for patients with advanced lung cancer incorporated ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis as an equivalent to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method recommended in 2013. Nevertheless, no specific recommendation for alternative methods was proposed owing to insufficient data. The aim of this study was to compare the results of ALK IHC, FISH, RNA next-generation sequencing (NGS), and RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) with available clinical data.

Methods

A search for lung carcinomas with ALK testing by greater than or equal to one modality (i.e., ALK IHC, FISH, NGS) was performed; a subset underwent RNA ISH. When available, clinical data were recorded.

Results

The results were concordant among all performed testing modalities in 86 of 90 cases (95.6%). Of the four discordant cases, two were ALK positive by FISH but negative by IHC, RNA NGS, and RNA ISH. The remaining two cases failed RNA NGS testing, one was IHC negative, FISH positive, RNA ISH negative and the second was IHC positive, FISH positive, RNA ISH equivocal. RNA NGS identified one rare and one novel ALK fusion. Sufficient therapy data were available in 10 cases treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors; three had disease progression, including one with discordant results (FISH positive, RNA NGS negative, IHC negative, RNA ISH negative) and two with concordant ALK positivity among all modalities.

Conclusions

Our results reveal high concordance among IHC, RNA NGS, and RNA ISH. In cases of discordance with available RNA NGS, FISH result was positive whereas IHC and ISH results were negative. On the basis of our data, multimodality testing is recommended to identify discrepant results and patients (un)likely to respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Diagnosis and Treatment of ALK Aberrations in Metastatic NSCLC

OPINION STATEMENT

There has been rapid progress in the use of targeted therapies for ALK-positive which has led to improve dramatically PFS and OS in the metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients. There are several molecules now available (crizotinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib) and others in development. Such an improvement in treatment efficacy has even more highlighted the importance of an adequate identification of ALK alterations. Efficient and easily accessible testing tools are required to identify eligible patients in a timely fashion. Different methods for detecting ALK+ NSCLC patients are now available, with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) currently representing validated diagnostic techniques for the initial assessment of ALK status. Furthermore the widespread use of next-generation sequencing to detect other possible different activating mutations has allowed to identify individual ALK fusion variants. Several more expensive and time-consuming methods are also available nowadays which have the advantage to detect even rarer uncommon ALK fusion variants and mutations in tumour or blood samples. A review of the evolving testing-treatment landscape is needed to highlight the importance of properly diagnosing and treating this group of patients.

Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) for Detecting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Rearrangement in Lung Cancer: Clinically Relevant Technical Aspects

In 2011, the Vysis Break Apart ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a companion diagnostic for detecting ALK rearrangement in lung cancer patients who may benefit from treatment of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. This assay is the current “gold standard”. According to updated ALK testing guidelines from the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Association for Molecular Pathology published in 2018, ALK immunohistochemistry is formally an alternative to ALK FISH, and simultaneous detection of multiple hot spots, including, at least, ALK, ROS1, RET, MET, ERBB2, BRAF and KRAS genes is also recommended while performing next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing. Therefore, ALK status in a specimen can be tested by different methods and platforms, even in the same institution or laboratory. In this review, we discuss several clinically relevant technical aspects of ALK FISH, including pros and cons of the unique two-step (50- to 100-cell) analysis approach employed in the Vysis Break Apart ALK FISH assay, including: the preset cutoff value of ≥15% for a positive result; technical aspects and biology of discordant results obtained by different methods; and incidental findings, such as ALK copy number gain or amplification and co-existent driver mutations. These issues have practical implications for ALK testing in the clinical laboratory following the updated guidelines.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase 5A4 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic assay in lung cancer: A Canadian reference testing center's results in population-based reflex testing

BACKGROUND

The presence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement predicts response to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was the initial reference standard to detect ALK rearrangement, but immunohistochemistry (IHC) using D5F3 has gained acceptance as an alternative diagnostic method. ALK IHC assays using other ALK antibodies have also been used as screening methods, but data supporting their utility as diagnostic tests have not been widely reported.

METHODS

Data from reflexive clinical ALK IHC test using the 5A4 clone concurrent with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing were analyzed. ALK IHC results were reported as negative (-), equivocal, or positive (+), with equivocal or positive staining validated by FISH break-apart probe testing. Treatment outcomes were reviewed for ALK IHC+ patients.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2015, 146 (2.5%) cases were reported as ALK IHC+, 188 (3.2%) were reported as equivocal, and 5624 (94.4%) were reported as ALK IHC-. Of the ALK IHC+ cases, 131/143(91.6%) were ALK FISH+. Excluding 6 cases in which FISH was inconclusive or not performed, the positive predictive value was 95.6%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. Most specimens (n = 5352 [89.6%]) were also successfully tested for EGFR. Clinical responses to ALK TKIs were noted in 49 ALK IHC+ patients, with a median progression-free survival of 9.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

ALK 5A4 IHC can serve as a robust diagnostic test for ALK-rearranged lung cancer and is associated with treatment response and survival. Optimized tissue allocation resulted in high success rates of combined reflex EGFR and ALK testing.

Oncologist uptake of comprehensive genomic profile guided targeted therapy

We describe the extent to which comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results were used by oncologists to guide targeted therapy selection in a cohort of solid tumor patients tested as part of standard care at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center June 2016-June 2017, with adequate follow up through September 2018 (n = 620). Overall, 28.4% of CGP tests advised physicians about targeted therapy use supported by companion diagnostic or practice guideline evidence. Post-test targeted therapy uptake was highest for patients in active treatment at the time of order (86% versus 76% of treatment naïve patients), but also took longer to initiate (median 50 days versus 7 days for treatment naïve patients), with few patients (2.6%) receiving targeted agents prior to testing. 100% of patients with resistance variants did not receive targeted agents. Treatment naïve patients received immunotherapy as the most common alternative. When targeted therapy given off-label or in a trial was the best CGP option, (7%) of patients received it. Our data illustrate the appropriate and heterogeneous use of CGP by oncologists as a longitudinal treatment decision tool based on patient history and treatment needs, and that some patients may benefit from testing prior to initiation of other standard treatments.

Sensitivity of next-generation sequencing assays detecting oncogenic fusions in plasma cell-free DNA

OBJECTIVES

Plasma genotyping represents an opportunity for convenient detection of clinically actionable mutations in advanced cancer patients, such has been well-documented in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Oncogenic gene fusions are complex variants that may be more challenging to detect by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Rigorous evaluation of plasma NGS assays in the detection of fusions is needed to maximize clinical utility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Additional plasma was collected from patients with advanced NSCLC and ALK, ROS1, or RET gene fusions in tissue who had undergone clinical plasma NGS using Guardant360^™(G360, Guardant Health). We then sequenced extracted cfDNA with a plasma NGS kit focused on known driver mutations in NSCLC (ctDx-Lung, Resolution Bioscience) with cloud-based bioinformatic analysis and blinded variant calling.

RESULTS

Of 16 patients assayed known to harbor anALK, ROS1, or RET in tumor, G360 detected fusions in 7 cases, ctDx-Lung detected fusions in 13 cases, and 3 cases were detected by neither. Of the 7 fusions detected by both assays, G360 reported lower mutant allelic fractions (AF). In cases missed by G360, tumor derived TP53 mutations were often detected confirming presence of tumor DNA. Raw sequencing data showed that inverted or out-of-frame variants were overrepresented in cases detected using ctDx-Lung but not by G360.

CONCLUSION

Focusing on complex, clinically actionable mutations using tumor as a reference standard allows for evaluation of technical differences in plasma NGS assays that may impact clinical performance. Noting the heterogeneity of fusion sequences observed in NSCLC, we hypothesize that differences in hybrid capture techniques and bioinformatic calling may be sources of variations in sensitivity among these assays.

Next-generation Sequencing for ALK and ROS1 Rearrangement Detection in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Implications of FISH-positive Patterns

BACKGROUND

Detection of ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancer is required for directing patient care. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry have been established as gold standard methods, next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are called to be at least equally successful. Comparison of these methods for translation into daily use is currently under investigation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty non-small-cell lung cancer paraffin-embedded samples with previous ALK (n = 33) and ROS1 (n = 7) FISH results were examined with the Oncomine Focus Assay and tested for ALK and ROS1 immunoreactivity. Clinical implications of concurrent molecular alterations and concordance between methods were evaluated.

RESULTS

NGS was successful in 32 (80%) cases: 25 ALK and 7 ROS1. Few concomitant alterations were detected: 1 ALK rearranged case had an ALK p.L1196M-resistant mutation, 4 had CDK4, MYC, and/or ALK amplifications, and 1 ROS1 rearranged case showed a FGFR4 amplification. Comparison between techniques revealed 5 (16%) discordant cases that had lower progression-free survival than concordant cases: 7.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-13) versus 19.4 (95% confidence interval, 10.1-28.6). Remarkably, 4 of these cases had isolated 3' signal FISH pattern (P = .026).

CONCLUSION

Our data support that the identification of 3' isolated signal FISH pattern in ALK and ROS1 cases might suggest a false-positive result. NGS seems a reliable technique to assess ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, offering the advantage over immunohistochemistry of detecting other molecular alterations with potential therapeutic implications.

Discordance between FISH, IHC, and NGS Analysis of ALK Status in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a Brief Report of 7 Cases

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement represents a landmark in the targeted therapy of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a sensitive and specific method to detect ALK protein expression, possibly an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In this study, the concordance of FISH and IHC to determine ALK status was evaluated, particularly focusing on discordant cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ALK status was tested by FISH and the IHC validated method (Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay) in 95 NSCLCs. Discordant cases were analyzed also by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The response to crizotinib of treated patients was recorded. RESULTS: Seven (7.3%) discordant cases were ALK FISH positive and IHC negative. They showed coexistent split signals pattern, with mean percentage of 15.4%, and 5′ deletions pattern, with mean percentage 31.7%. Two cases had also gene amplification pattern. In three cases (42.8 %), the polysomy was observed. The NGS assay confirmed IHC results. In these patients, the treatment with crizotinib was ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: In our discordant cases, a coexistent complex pattern (deleted, split, and amplified/polysomic) of ALK gene was observed by FISH analysis. These complex rearranged cases were not detectable by IHC, and it could be speculated that more complex biological mechanisms could modulate protein expression. These data highlight the role of IHC and underscore the complexity of the genetic pattern of ALK. It could be crucial to consider these findings in order to best select patients for anti-ALK treatment in daily clinical practice.

RNA-based analysis of ALK fusions in non-small cell lung cancer cases showing IHC/FISH discordance

Background

Rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) belong to the promising targets in the therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are predominantly detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). However, both methods occasionally produce discordant results, especially in so-called borderline (BL) cases, showing ALK FISH-positive signals in 10–20% of the tumor nuclei around the cutoff (15%). This leads to a diagnostic and thus to a therapeutic dilemma.

Methods

We selected 18 unequivocal (12 ALK IHC/FISH-negative; 6 ALK IHC/FISH-positive) and 15 equivocal samples with discordant results between FISH (Abbott, Vysis LSI ALK Dual Color) and IHC (Ventana, D5F3), including cases with FISH-BL results, for further RNA based-analysis. To detect ALK rearrangement at the transcriptional level, RNA was analyzed using a targeted multiplex-PCR panel followed by IonTorrent sequencing and by direct transcript counting using a digital probe-based assay (NanoString). Sensitivity of both methods was defined using RNA obtained from an ALK-positive cell line dilution series.

Results

Cases with unequivocal IHC/FISH results showed concordant data with both RNA-based methods, whereas the three IHC-negative/FISH-positive samples were negative. The four IHC-negative/FISH-BL-negative cases, as well as the five IHC-negative/FISH-BL-positive samples showed negative results by massive parallel sequencing (MPS) and digital probe-based assay. The two IHC-positive/FISH-BL-positive cases were both positive on the RNA-level, whereas a tumor with questionable IHC and FISH-BL-positive status displayed no ALK fusion transcript.

Conclusions

The comparison of methods for the confirmation of ALK rearrangements revealed that the detection of ALK protein by IHC and ALK fusion transcripts on transcriptional level by MPS and the probe-based assay leads to concordant results. Only a small proportion of clearly ALK FISH-positive cases are unable to express the ALK protein and ALK fusion transcript which might explain a non-responding to ALK inhibitors. Therefore, our findings led us to conclude that ALK testing should initially be based on IHC and/or RNA-based methods.

Simultaneous detection of lung fusions using a multiplex RT-PCR next generation sequencing-based approach: a multi-institutional research study

Background

Gene fusion events resulting from chromosomal rearrangements play an important role in initiation of lung adenocarcinoma. The recent association of four oncogenic driver genes, ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1, as lung tumor predictive biomarkers has increased the need for development of up-to-date technologies for detection of these biomarkers in limited amounts of material.

Methods

We describe here a multi-institutional study using the Ion AmpliSeq™ RNA Fusion Lung Cancer Research Panel to interrogate previously characterized lung tumor samples.

Results

Reproducibility between laboratories using diluted fusion-positive cell lines was 100%. A cohort of lung clinical research samples from different origins (tissue biopsies, tissue resections, lymph nodes and pleural fluid samples) were used to evaluate the panel. We observed 97% concordance for ALK (28/30 positive; 71/70 negative samples), 95% for ROS1 (3/4 positive; 19/18 negative samples), and 93% for RET (2/1 positive; 13/14 negative samples) between the AmpliSeq assay and other methodologies.

Conclusion

This methodology enables simultaneous detection of multiple ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1 gene fusion transcripts in a single panel, enhanced by an integrated analysis solution. The assay performs well on limited amounts of input RNA (10 ng) and offers an integrated single assay solution for detection of actionable fusions in lung adenocarcinoma, with potential savings in both cost and turn-around-time compared to the combination of all four assays by other methods.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4736-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Simultaneous VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR testing of ALK status in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients and response to crizotinib

Background

ALK rearrangement-advanced NSCLC patients respond to crizotinib. ALK rearrangement is currently determined with RT-PCR. VENTANA IHC is a standard method to identify ALK protein overexpression in NSCLC; however, VENTANA IHC has rarely been used to determine the response to crizotinib in Chinese patients with NSCLC and ALK overexpression. To better clarify the clinical implication of VENTANA IHC to detect ALK rearrangements, we conducted this study to analyze VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR in a large cohort of Chinese patients with NSCLC undergoing screening for ALK rearrangements.

Methods

A total of 1720 patients with NSCLC who had ALK rearrangements detected by VENTANA IHC and/or RT-PCR were included in this analysis. We compared the efficacy and survival of ALK-positive patients detected by VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR. We used NGS to identify patients in whom the two methods were inconsistent.

Results

Among 1720 patients, 187 (10.87%) were shown to be ALK-positive by VENTANA IHC and/or RT-PCR, and 66 received crizotinib treatment. We identified 10.27% (172/1674) of patients as ALK-positive by the VENTANA IHC method, and 12.73% (41/322) of patients had ALK rearrangements by the RT-PCR method. Twenty-nine of 276 (10.51%) ALK-positive patients were simultaneously analyzed using VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR. The overall response rates were 65.90% (29/44) by VENTANA IHC and 55.88% (19/34) by RT-PCR. The disease control rates were 86.36% (38/44) by VENTANA IHC and 76.47% (26/34) by RT-PCR. In contrast, the median progression-free survival for VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR was 8.5 and 9.2 months, respectively. The VENTANA IHC and RT-PCR results obtained for 6 of 17 ALK-positive patients were inconsistent based on NGS; specifically, 4 patients had EML4-ALK fusions, 2 patients had non EML4-ALK fusions, 1 patient had a KCL1-ALK fusion, and one patient had a FBXO36-ALK fusion.

Conclusions

VENTANA IHC is a reliable and rapid screening tool used in routine pathologic laboratories for the identification of suitable candidates for ALK-targeted therapy. VENTANA IHC has moderate sensitivity and a slightly higher association with response to therapy with ALK inhibitors, and some VENTANA IHC-positive, but RT-PCR-negative cases may benefit from crizotinib.

CEP72-ROS1: A novel ROS1 oncogenic fusion variant in lung adenocarcinoma identified by next-generation sequencing

ROS1 rearrangement is a validated therapeutic driver gene in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and represents a small subset (1–2%) of NSCLC. A total of 17 different fusion partner genes of ROS1 in NSCLC have been reported. The multi‐targeted MET/ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in ROS1‐rearranged NSCLC. Consequently, ROS1 detection assays include fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and real‐time PCR. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) assay covers a range of fusion genes and approaches to discover novel receptor‐kinase rearrangements in lung cancer. A 63‐year‐old male smoker with stage IV NSCLC (TxNxM1) was detected with a novel ROS1 fusion. Histological examination of the tumor showed lung adenocarcinoma. NGS analysis of the hydrothorax cellblocks revealed a novel CEP72‐ROS1 rearrangement. This novel CEP72‐ROS1 fusion variant is generated by the fusion of exons 1–11 of CEP72 on chromosome 5p15 to exons 23–43 of ROS1 on chromosome 6q22. The predicted CEP72‐ROS1 protein product contains 1202 amino acids comprising the N‐terminal amino acids 594–647 of CEP72 and C‐terminal amino acid 1‐1148 of ROS1. CEP72‐ROS1 is a novel ROS1 fusion variant in NSCLC discovered by NGS and could be included in ROS1 detection assay, such as reverse transcription PCR. Pleural effusion samples show good diagnostic performance in clinical practice.

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology

CONTEXT

- In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing.

OBJECTIVE

- To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update.

DESIGN

- The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations.

RESULTS

- Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

- The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes ( ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology

CONTEXT

In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update.

DESIGN

The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations.

RESULTS

Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology

CONTEXT

In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update.

DESIGN

The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations.

RESULTS

Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.

ALK FISH patterns and the detection of ALK fusions by next generation sequencing in lung adenocarcinoma

Break-apart ALK FISH probe is the FDA approved approach for detection of ALK rearrangements in lung carcinoma patients who may benefit from ALK kinase inhibitors. The FISH assay can be technically challenging and difficult to interpret. ALK immunohistochemistry and next generation sequencing have been proposed as alternative approaches. In this study, we compared various ALK –FISH patterns to next –generation sequencing (NGS) for gene fusion detection, ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tumor responses to crizotinib. 72 (4%) of 2116 lung adenocarcinoma were positive by ALK- FISH. Of 28 ALK-FISH positive cases selected for the study, FISH patterns included 15 (54%) cases with split signal, 10 (36%) with single orange signal and 3 (10%) with “mixed pattern”. 12 (80%) cases with split signal and 4 (40%) cases with single orange signal were positive by NGS and IHC, while mixed cases were all negative. Mutation analysis of discordant cases revealed multiple mutations including oncogenic mutations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ATM genes. All discordant cases in groups with split and mixed signal showed a lower number of cells with rearrangement (mean 28.5%; range 20.5-36.9%). No statistically significant association between response to crizotinib and FISH patterns was observed (p=0.73). In contrast, NGS fusion positive cases were associated with more responses to crizotinib than NGS negative cases (p= 0.016). Our study suggests that ALK FISH alone may not be the most reliable assay for detection of ALK gene rearrangements, and probably should be used in parallel with ALK IHC and NGS for detection of gene fusions and mutations.

Dual drive coexistence of EML4-ALK and TPM3-ROS1 fusion in advanced lung adenocarcinoma

We report a case of concomitant EML4-ALK and TPM3-ROS1 fusion in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a 47-year-old Chinese man and review the clinical characteristics of this type double of fusion. The patient presented with a local tumor of the left upper lobe and underwent thoracoscopy. Postoperative surgical pathologic staging revealed T1a N0 M0 stage IA. Histological examination of the tumor showed lung adenocarcinoma. Ventana ALK (D5F3) assay of the left lung tissue was ALK negative; however, immunohistochemical assay was positive for ROS1 protein. Using next generation sequencing, we found that the tumor had concomitant EML4-ALK and TPM3-ROS1 fusion. No recurrence was observed during seven months of follow-up. Precise diagnostic techniques allow the detection of concomitant ROS1 fusion and other driver genes, including ALK or EGFR; therefore oncologists should consider this rare double mutation in NSCLC patients. Further exploration of treatment models is required to provide additional therapeutic options.

EGFR-RAD51 fusion variant in lung adenocarcinoma and response to erlotinib: A case report

The most frequent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations of lung cancer include exon 19 in deletion and the exon 21 L858R mutation. And EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as the standard first line treatment show good response to classical/sensitizing EGFR mutations. With the development of detection methods, some uncommon genomic mutation events such as exon 18-25 kinase domain duplications (KDD) and EGFR rearrangements (EGFR-RAD51 or EGFR-PURB) are found. We reported a case of EGFR-RAD51 fusion in non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC) and the efficacy of erlotinib to this type fusion of NSCLC patients. A 48-year-old Chinese man with right lung tumor and multiple brain metastases NSCLC (T1N2M1, stage IV). Histological examination of surgical specimens from the brain tumor showed lung adenocarcinoma metastasis. By using next generation sequencing assay, we found that tumor had EGFR-RAD51 fusion rather than the most common kind of EGFR mutations. Then the patient experienced a remarkable tumor response to erlotinib. Considering this rare EGFR fusion and remarkable response to TKI treatment, we conclude that the incidence of EGFR fusions in NSCLC patients should be attentive. NSCLC patients with EGFR-RAD51 fusion gene response to treatment with EGFR inhibitor. With the guidance of precise diagnosis, it is important that we should realize other rare EGFR gene mutations and novel diagnostic method.

Astroblastoma: a distinct tumor entity characterized by alterations of the X chromosome and MN1 rearrangement

Astroblastoma is a rare, enigmatic tumor of the central nervous system (CNS) which shares some clinicopathologic aspects with other CNS tumors, especially ependymoma. To further clarify the nature of astroblastoma, we performed clinicopathologic and molecular genetic studies on eight cases of astroblastoma. The median age of the patients was 14.5 years, ranging from 5 to 60 years, and seven of the patients were female. All tumors arose in the cerebral hemisphere and radiologically appeared to be well-bordered, nodular tumors often associated with cystic areas and contrast-enhancement. Six of the seven patients with prognosis data survived without recurrences during the follow-up periods ranging from six to 76 months. One patient had multiple recurrences and died six years later. All tumors exhibited salient microscopic features, such as being well demarcated from the surrounding brain tissue, perivascular arrangement of epithelioid tumor cells (represented by "astroblastic" pseudorosettes, trabecular alignment, and pseudopapillary patterns), and hyalinized blood vessels. Immunoreactivity for GFAP, S-100 protein, Olig2, and EMA was variably demonstrated in all tumors, and IDH1 R132H and L1CAM were negative. Array comparative genomic hybridization revealed numerous heterozygous deletions on chromosome X in the four tumors studied, and break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization demonstrated rearrangement of MN1 in five tumors with successful testing. The characteristic clinicopathologic and genetic findings support the idea that astroblastoma is distinct from other CNS tumors, in particular, ependymoma. In addition, MN1 rearrangement and aberrations of chromosome X may partly be involved in the pathogenesis of astroblastoma.

Detection of known and novel ALK fusion transcripts in lung cancer patients using next-generation sequencing approaches

Rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent a novel molecular target in a small subset of tumors. Although ALK rearrangements are usually assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), molecular approaches have recently emerged as relevant alternatives in routine laboratories. Here, we evaluated the use of two different amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods (AmpliSeq and Archer^®FusionPlex^®) to detect ALK rearrangements, and compared these with IHC and FISH. A total of 1128 NSCLC specimens were screened using conventional analyses, and a subset of 37 (15 ALK-positive, and 22 ALK-negative) samples were selected for NGS assays. Although AmpliSeq correctly detected 25/37 (67.6%) samples, 1/37 (2.7%) and 11/37 (29.7%) specimens were discordant and uncertain, respectively, requiring further validation. In contrast, Archer^®FusionPlex^® accurately classified all samples and allowed the correct identification of one rare DCTN1-ALK fusion, one novel CLIP1-ALK fusion, and one novel GCC2-ALK transcript. Of particular interest, two out of three patients harboring these singular rearrangements were treated with and sensitive to crizotinib. These data show that Archer^®FusionPlex^® may provide an effective and accurate alternative to FISH testing for the detection of known and novel ALK rearrangements in clinical diagnostic settings.

Immunohistochemistry for predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer

In the era of targeted therapy, predictive biomarker testing has become increasingly important for non-small cell lung cancer. Of multiple predictive biomarker testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely available and technically less challenging, can provide clinically meaningful results with a rapid turn-around-time and is more cost efficient than molecular platforms. In fact, several IHC assays for predictive biomarkers have already been implemented in routine pathology practice. In this review, we will discuss: (I) the details of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) IHC assays including the performance of multiple antibody clones, pros and cons of IHC platforms and various scoring systems to design an optimal algorithm for predictive biomarker testing; (II) issues associated with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC assays; (III) appropriate pre-analytical tissue handling and selection of optimal tissue samples for predictive biomarker IHC.

ALK in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Pathobiology, Epidemiology, Detection from Tumor Tissue and Algorithm Diagnosis in a Daily Practice

Patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harboring an ALK rearrangement, detected from a tissue sample, can benefit from targeted ALK inhibitor treatment. Several increasingly effective ALK inhibitors are now available for treatment of patients. However, despite an initial favorable response to treatment, in most cases relapse or progression occurs due to resistance mechanisms mainly caused by mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of ALK. The detection of an ALK rearrangement is pivotal and can be done using different methods, which have variable sensitivity and specificity depending, in particular, on the quality and quantity of the patient’s sample. This review will first highlight briefly some information regarding the pathobiology of an ALK rearrangement and the epidemiology of patients harboring this genomic alteration. The different methods used to detect an ALK rearrangement as well as their advantages and disadvantages will then be examined and algorithms proposed for detection in daily routine practice.

The Molecular Pathology of Lung Cancer

Advances in lung cancer genomics have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of this heterogeneous and clinically significant group of tumors. This article provides a broad overview of the most clinically relevant oncogenic alterations in common and rare lung tumors, with an emphasis on the pathologic correlates of the major oncogenic drivers, including EGFR, KRAS, ALK, and MET. Illustrations emphasize the morphologic diversity of lung adenocarcinoma, including genotype-phenotype correlations of genomic evolution in tumorigenesis. Molecular diagnostic approaches, including PCR-based testing, massively parallel sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry are reviewed.

Immunohistochemistry of Pulmonary Biomarkers: A Perspective From Members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society

The use of immunohistochemistry for the determination of pulmonary carcinoma biomarkers is a well-established and powerful technique. Immunohistochemisty is readily available in pathology laboratories, is relatively easy to perform and assess, can provide clinically meaningful results very quickly, and is relatively inexpensive. Pulmonary predictive biomarkers provide results essential for timely and accurate therapeutic decision making; for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, predictive immunohistochemistry includes ALK and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) (ROS1, EGFR in Europe) testing. Handling along proper methodologic lines is needed to ensure patients receive the most accurate and representative test outcomes.

Nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: diagnostic difficulties in small biopsies and cytological specimens

The pathological and molecular classification of lung cancer has become substantially more complex over the past decade. For diagnostic purposes on small samples, additional stains are frequently required to distinguish between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Subsequently, for advanced nonsquamous cell nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, predictive analyses on epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1 are required. In NSCLCs negative for these biomarkers, programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry is performed. Small samples (biopsy and cytology) require “tissue” management, which is best achieved by the interaction of all physicians involved.

A comparison of ALK gene rearrangement and ALK protein expression in primary lung carcinoma and matched metastasis

AIMS

The 2013 College of American Pathologists, the Association for Molecular Pathology and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer guideline for EGFR and ALK testing in lung carcinoma indicates that either the primary tumour or the metastasis is suitable for testing. The heterogeneity of gene mutations has been studied extensively, while similar reports on gene rearrangements are limited. The aim of this study was to determine if ALK status between primary tumour and matched metastasis differs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifteen ALK fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) rearranged and 19 non-ALK FISH rearranged adenocarcinomas were collected retrospectively based on availability of tissue from a matched metastatic site. Sixty-eight samples were tested by ALK FISH (Vysis ALK break-apart FISH kit) and ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Ventana ALK D5F3 CDx assay). Overall agreement of FISH and IHC was 88%, with IHC showing 100% specificity and 71% sensitivity. Concordance between primary site and metastasis by ALK FISH was seen in 30 cases (88%), and in 32 cases (94%) by ALK IHC. Five discordant cases were found (15%). Three ALK FISH discordant cases had low percentage of ALK FISH-positive tumour cells (average 23%, range: 18-31%) and all were negative by ALK IHC. One IHC discordant case had a high percentage of ALK FISH-positive tumour cells (67%), and was ALK IHC-negative. One FISH discordant case showed ALK FISH- and ALK IHC-positive primary tumour, but ALK FISH- and ALK IHC-negative metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

ALK FISH results show more frequent discordances between primary tumour and matched metastases than ALK IHC, due probably to technical challenges and sample quality. This observation indicates that the quality of sample and technical expertise of the laboratory should guide the decision about ALK testing in clinical practice.

Responses to Crizotinib therapy in five patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who tested FISH negative and Ventana immunohistochemistry positive for ALK fusions

AIM

Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reverse transcription-PCR can detect ALK rearrangements, the ALK break-apart FISH assay is currently considered the standard method.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Five patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, who had an ALK-negative FISH result that was later confirmed as positive by the Ventana IHC assay, were studied. Four had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. All five were subsequently treated with Crizoitinib 250 mg twice daily.

RESULTS & CONCLUSION

Four patients had a partial response to Crizotinib and one had stable disease. IHC is an efficient technique for diagnosing ALK rearrangements in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, and may serve as an alternative to FISH in clinical practice.

Institutional implementation of clinical tumor profiling on an unselected cancer population

BACKGROUND. Comprehensive genomic profiling of a patient's cancer can be used to diagnose, monitor, and recommend treatment. Clinical implementation of tumor profiling in an enterprise-wide, unselected cancer patient population has yet to be reported. METHODS. We deployed a hybrid-capture and massively parallel sequencing assay (OncoPanel) for all adult and pediatric patients at our combined cancer centers. Results were categorized by pathologists based on actionability. We report the results for the first 3,727 patients tested. RESULTS. Our cohort consists of cancer patients unrestricted by disease site or stage. Across all consented patients, half had sufficient and available (>20% tumor) material for profiling; once specimens were received in the laboratory for pathology review, 73% were scored as adequate for genomic testing. When sufficient DNA was obtained, OncoPanel yielded a result in 96% of cases. 73% of patients harbored an actionable or informative alteration; only 19% of these represented a current standard of care for therapeutic stratification. The findings recapitulate those of previous studies of common cancers but also identify alterations, including in AXL and EGFR, associated with response to targeted therapies. In rare cancers, potentially actionable alterations suggest the utility of a "cancer-agnostic" approach in genomic profiling. Retrospective analyses uncovered contextual genomic features that may inform therapeutic response and examples where diagnoses revised by genomic profiling markedly changed clinical management. CONCLUSIONS. Broad sequencing-based testing deployed across an unselected cancer cohort is feasible. Genomic results may alter management in diverse scenarios; however, additional barriers must be overcome to enable precision cancer medicine on a large scale. FUNDING. This work was supported by DFCI, BWH, and the National Cancer Institute (5R33CA155554 and 5K23CA157631).

An Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Immunohistochemistry-Negative but Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Is Resistant to Crizotinib

INTRODUCTION

Oncogenic fusion of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) with echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4 protein or other partner genes occurs in 3% to 6% of lung adenocarcinomas. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the accepted standard for detecting anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) gene rearrangement that gives rise to new fusion genes, not all ALK FISH-positive patients respond to ALK inhibitor therapies. We report here an ALK FISH-positive patient-derived xenograft (PDX) that was nonresponsive to crizotinib therapy.

METHODS

The PDX patient human lung cancer (PHLC402) was established in NOD/SCID mice from a patient with resected pT4N1M0 lung adenocarcinoma. ALK gene status was investigated using the standard FISH break-apart assay, reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RNA sequencing and immunohistochemical assay using the 5A4 antibody. PHLC402 was treated with crizotinib (50 mg/kg) by daily oral gavage.

RESULTS

ALK FISH assay was positive in both the primary patient tumor and PDX, which were negative for ALK protein expression by immunohistochemical analysis. ALK fusion product was not detected by RNA sequencing and reverse-transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction comparing the 5' and 3' ALK transcript levels. Crizotinib treatment of PHLC402 grown in mice resulted in no tumor response.

CONCLUSION

ALK protein expression may be necessary for ALK FISH-positive lung cancer to be responsive to ALK inhibitor therapy.

Profile of Ventana ALK (D5F3) companion diagnostic assay for non-small-cell lung carcinomas

The development of several ALK inhibitors means that the importance of accurately identifying ALK-positive lung cancer has never been greater. Therefore, it is crucial that ALK testing assays become more standardized. The aim of this review is to comment on the recently FDA-approved VENTANA ALK (D5F3) Companion Diagnostic (CDx) Assay. This kit provides high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ALK rearrangements and seamless integration into the laboratory workflow, with a fully automated analytical phase and fast interpretation. The use of controls increases the sensitivity and specificity and a dichotomous scoring approach enhances reproducibility.

ALK Protein Analysis by IHC Staining after Recent Regulatory Changes: A Comparison of Two Widely Used Approaches, Revision of the Literature, and a New Testing Algorithm

INTRODUCTION

Recent regulatory changes have allowed the diagnostic use of immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis for the identification of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are eligible for treatment with anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) inhibitors. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ) as companion diagnostics, and the Italian Medicines Agency has recognized IHC analysis as a diagnostic test indicating an algorithm for patient selection.

METHODS

On the basis of the new regulations, we compared two commonly used IHC assays on 1031 lung adenocarcinomas: the VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay with the OptiView Amplification Kit (Ventana Medical Systems) and a standard IHC test with the clone 5A4 (Novocastra, Leica Biosystems, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) along with their interpretative algorithms. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed in all cases. Next-generation sequencing was performed in FISH/IHC analysis-discordant samples.

RESULTS

FISH gave positive results in 33 (3.2%) cases. When FISH was used as a reference, the VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx assay had a sensitivity of 90.9% ± 2.6%, a specificity of 99.8% ± 0.6%, and positive and negative predictive values of 93.8% ± 2.1% and 99.7% ± 0.6%, respectively. The clone 5A4-based IHC test showed a sensitivity of 90.9% ± 2.6%, a specificity of 98.3% ± 1.3%, and positive and negative predictive values of 63.8% ± 4.2% and 99.7% ± 0.6%, respectively. Five cases with IHC analysis/FISH-discordant results in our series were analyzed together with those previously reported in the literature. Overall, data from 35 patients indicate a response rate to ALK inhibitors in 100% of FISH-negative/IHC analysis-positive cases (seven of seven) and 46% of FISH-positive/IHC analysis-negative cases (13 of 28), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm the difficulty in managing an IHC test without amplification in the absence of confirmatory FISH analysis, as well as the possibility of performing a direct diagnosis in approximately 90% of patients by the VENTANA ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay. On the basis of the recent regulatory changes, the data that have emerged from the literature, and the results of the present study, a new algorithm for ALK assessment in non-small cell lung cancer has been devised.