A phase II trial of erlotinib monotherapy in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who do not possess active EGFR mutations: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group trial 0705

Ocular Surface Side Effects of Novel Anticancer Drugs

Surgery, anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, hormonal medicines, and targeted treatments), and/or radiation are common treatment strategies for neoplastic diseases. Anticancer drugs eliminate malignant cells through the inhibition of specific pathways that contribute to the formation and development of cancer. Given the ability of such pharmacological medications to combat cancerous cells, their role in the management of neoplastic diseases has become essential. However, these drugs may also lead to undesirable systemic and ocular adverse effects due to cyto/neuro-toxicity and inflammatory reactions. Ocular surface side effects are recognized to significantly impact patient's quality of life and quality of vision. Blepharoconjunctivitis is known to be a common side effect caused by oxaliplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and docetaxel, while anastrozole, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil can all determine dry eye disease. However, the potential processes involved in the development of these alterations are yet not fully understood, especially for novel drugs currently available for cancer treatment. This review aims at analyzing the potential ocular surface and adnexal side effects of novel anticancer medications, trying to provide a better understanding of the underlying pharmacological processes and useful insights on the choice of proper management.

Ocular Toxicity of Targeted Anticancer Agents

The proliferation of targeted anticancer agents over the last two decades has revolutionized cancer treatment and improved survival in many previously refractory malignancies. However, many agents are associated with characteristic ophthalmic adverse effects. It is important that ophthalmologists recognize and maintain a high index of suspicion for these side effects in patients on targeted therapy. Most ophthalmic adverse effects can be treated with specific ocular therapy without discontinuation of cancer treatment, although it is important to be aware of the life-threatening and vision-threatening circumstances that would require therapy cessation in conjunction with the patient's oncologist. This review aims to summarize the ophthalmic adverse effects of targeted and hormonal anticancer agents and briefly describe their management.

Eye, hepatobiliary, and renal disorders of erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat EGFR mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Skin rash and diarrhea are well-known and common adverse events in patients receiving erlotinib, whereas other adverse events, including eye, liver, or renal disorders have not been evaluated adequately. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the ocular, hepatobiliary, and renal toxicities of erlotinib in patients with NSCLC cancers.

Methods

In total, sixty studies were assessed, and the results of the included studies were quantitatively integrated using meta-analysis. The incidence of ocular, hepatobiliary (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and bilirubin elevations; other hepatic adverse events), and renal adverse events were estimated. Additionally, the erlotinib-treated groups and the control groups (placebo or other treatment) were compared with respect to ocular disorders and ALT elevation. The study protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42018093758.

Results

The overall incidence of ocular disorders was 3.30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.20%–5.00%). The incidence of ALT elevation, bilirubin elevation, and other hepatobiliary disorders was 6.40% (95% CI 3.90%–10.4%), 3.80% (95% CI 2.30%–6.10%), and 1.00% (95% 0.60%–1.80%), respectively. The incidence of renal disorder was 3.10% (95% CI 1.90%–5.00%). The risk of ocular toxicity in the erlotinib treatment group was significantly increased (risk ratio = 2.91; 95% CI 1.70–4.98) compared to that in the control group. ALT elevation was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion

Based on the results, careful monitoring of ocular toxicity in patients receiving erlotinib should be recommended and closer monitoring of hepatic toxicity should be also recommended in patients with liver-related risk factors.

The efficacy and safety of anlotinib treatment for advanced lung cancer

Objective

Anlotinib is an oral novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and stem cell factor receptor (c-Kit). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib treatment in advanced lung cancer in the real world.

Methods

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of apatinib in patients with previously treated advanced lung cancer from 2018 to 2019 in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were included in the present study. Thirty-one of these patients received anlotinib treatment as a third line and 27 patients received further therapy.  All 58 patients had therapeutic evaluation and 46 patients acquired progression-free survival evaluation. Ten patients achieved partial response (PR), and 36 achieved stable disease (SD), representing a response rate of 17.2% and a disease control rate of 77.6%. Median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (95% CI 1.595-5.071). The toxicities associated with anlotinib were generally acceptable with a total grade 3/4 toxicity of 5.2%. The toxicities of anlotinib were generally tolerated and the common toxicities were hand-foot syndrome and hypertension.

Conclusion

In the third-line or more-line treatment of advanced lung cancer, anlotinib appears to have some activity when utilized as a salvage treatment. Adverse reactions are controllable.

Recent trends in the treatment of unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Approximately 20-25% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is diagnosed when the disease has progressed to clinical stage III. At this stage, and even if the cancer is considered unresectable, the treatment strategy should aim to achieve a cure. At the time of the initial diagnosis, it is necessary for medical oncologists to devise the best treatment strategy for each patient by composing a multidisciplinary treatment team including thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists. In this review, we summarize prior pivotal clinical trials in unresectable clinical stage III NSCLC. Furthermore, we review very recent clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC.

Pneumonitis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor: Meta-analysis of 153 cohorts with 15,713 patients: Meta-analysis of incidence and risk factors of EGFR-TKI pneumonitis in NSCLC

PURPOSE

Pneumonitis is a significant toxicity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We studied the incidence of pneumonitis in clinical trials of EGFR-TKI published in 2003-2017, and performed subgroups analyses to identity predisposing factors.

METHODS

Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE search up to 4/17/17 using the keywords, "erlotinib", "gefitinib", "afatinib", "osimertinib", and "lung cancer", resulted in a total of 153 eligible trial cohorts with 15,713 advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKI. The pooled incidence of all-grade, high-grade, and grade 5 pneumonitis was obtained. Subgroup analyses were performed with meta-regression using study-level covariates.

RESULTS

Among the patients without prior exposure to EGFR-TKI, the overall incidence was 1.12% (95% CI:0.79-1.58%) for all-grade, 0.61% (95% CI:0.40-0.93%) for high-grade, and 0.20% (95% CI:0.11-0.38%) for grade 5 pneumonitis. The incidence was significantly higher in Japanese studies compared to studies of non-Japan origin, for all-grade (4.77% vs. 0.55%, p < 0.001), high grade (2.49% vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001), and grade 5 pneumonitis (1.00% vs. 0.18%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated higher odds of pneumonitis in Japanese studies for all-grade (odds ratio [OR]: 5.04; 95% CI:3.14-8.11, p < 0.001), high-grade (OR: 4.45; 95% CI:2.50-7.93, p < 0.001), and grade 5 pneumonitis (OR: 4.55; 95% CI:2.20-9.44, p < 0.001) compared to others, after adjusting for types of EGFR-TKI and lines of therapy. In patients with EGFR retreatment analyzed separately, the pooled incidence was 1.13% (95% CI:0.40-3.15%) for all-grade, 0.49% (95% CI:0.21-1.11%) for high-grade, and 0.16% (95% CI:0.04-0.65%) for grade 5 pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of EGFR-TKI pneumonitis was 1.12% in patients without prior exposure to EGFR-TKI, and 1.13% in EGFR-TKI retreatment group. The cohorts from Japan had significantly higher incidence of pneumonitis, providing insights for further mechanistic studies.

Anlotinib as a third-line therapy in patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised phase II trial (ALTER0302)

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib (AL3818) is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibiting tumour angiogenesis and proliferative signalling. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of third-line anlotinib for patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (RA-NSCLC).

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomised 1 : 1 to receive anlotinib (12 mg per day, per os; days 1-14; 21 days per cycle) or a placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 117 eligible patients enrolled from 13 clinical centres in China were analysed in the full analysis set. No patients received immune check-point inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor status was unknown in 60.7% of the population. PFS was better with anlotinib compared with the placebo (4.8 vs 1.2 months; hazard ratio (HR)=0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20-0.51; P<0.0001), as well as overall response rate (ORR) (10.0%; 95% CI, 2.4-17.6% vs 0%; 95% CI, 0-6.27%; P=0.028). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-15.1) for the anlotinib group and 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.3-10.5) for the placebo group (HR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.51-1.18; P=0.2316). Adverse events were more frequent in the anlotinib than the placebo group. The percentage of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events was 21.67% in the anlotinib group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib as a third-line treatment provided significant PFS benefits to patients with RA-NSCLC when compared with the placebo, and the toxicity profiles showed good tolerance.

MAPK1E322K mutation increases head and neck squamous cell carcinoma sensitivity to erlotinib through enhanced secretion of amphiregulin

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have not been effective in unselected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) populations. We previously reported an exceptional response to a brief course of erlotinib in a patient with advanced HNSCC whose tumor harbored a MAPK1^E322K somatic mutation. MAPK1^E322Kwas associated with increased p-EGFR, increased EGFR downstream signaling and increased sensitivity to erlotinib. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of MAPK1^E322K-mediated EGFR activation in the context of erlotinib sensitivity. We demonstrated increased AREG secretion in HNSCC cell lines harboring endogenous or exogenous MAPK1^E322K compared to wild type MAPK1. We found inhibition or knockdown of MAPK1 with siRNA resulted in reduced secretion of AREG and decreased sensitivity to erlotinib in the setting of MAPK1^E322K. MAPK1^E322K was associated with increased AREG secretion leading to an autocrine feedback loop involving AREG, EGFR and downstream signaling. Knockdown of AREG in HNSCC cells harboring MAPK1^E322K abrogated EGFR signaling and decreased sensitivity to erlotinib in vitro and in vivo. These cumulative findings implicate increased AREG secretion and EGFR activation as contributing to increased erlotinib sensitivity in MAPK1^E322K HNSCC.

The comparison of outcomes from tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy in second- or third-line for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with wild-type or unknown EGFR status

BACKGROUND

Second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients includes monotherapy with a third-generation cytotoxic drug (CT) or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). These options are the actual standard for EGFR wild-type (WT) status, as patients with EGFR mutations achieve greater benefit by the use of TKI in first-line treatment. Some clinical trials and meta-analyses investigated the comparison between CT and TKI in second-line, but data are conflicting.

METHODS

We designed a retrospective trial to gather information about TKI sensitivity in comparison with CT. We selected from clinical records patients treated with at least 1 line of CT and at least 1 line of TKI. We collected data about age, sex, performance status, comorbidity, smoking status, histotype, metastatic sites, EGFR status, treatment schedule, better response and time-to-progression (TTP) for each line of treatment and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

93 patients met selection criteria. Mean age 66,7 (range: 46-84). M/F ratio is 3:1. 39 EGFR-WT and 54 EGFR-UK. All patients received erlotinib or gefitinib as second-line treatment or erlotinib as third-line treatment. No TTP differences were observed for both second-line (HR:0,91; p = 0,6333) and third-line (HR:1.1; p = 0,6951) treatment (TKI vs CT). A trend of a benefit in OS in favor of 3rd-line TKI (HR:0,68; p = 0,11).

CONCLUSIONS

This study explores the role of TKIs in EGFR non-mutated NSCLC patients. OS analysis highlights a trend to a benefit in patients who received TKI in third-line, even if this result is statistically non-significant. Further analysis are needed to find an explanation for this observation.

A randomized phase II trial of erlotinib vs. S-1 as a third- or fourth-line therapy for patients with wild-type EGFR non-small cell lung cancer (HOT1002)

PURPOSE

A high proportion of patients with wild-type EGFR non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive third-line therapy and beyond, with no prospective randomized trials addressing the issue. This study aimed to select the most suitable regimen as a third- or fourth-line therapy for wild-type EGFR NSCLC.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized phase II study in Japan included patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown EGFR, who progressed after two or three previous chemotherapies. The patients were randomly assigned to erlotinib (150 mg/day, days 1-21) or S-1 (80-120 mg/day, days 1-14) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2016, 37 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib (E arm, n = 19) and S-1 (S arm, n = 18). This study was terminated prematurely because of poor patient accrual. DCR/ORR were 42.1%/15.8% in the E arm and 66.7%/16.7% in the S arm. Median PFS/OS were 1.6 months/8.0 months in the E arm and 3.3 months/12.2 months in the S arm. In both groups, the most commonly reported grade 3-4 toxicities were fatigue, anorexia, and nausea. One grade 5 pneumonitis occurred in the S arm. No significant difference was seen in QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 as a third- or fourth-line therapy for wild-type EGFR NSCLC showed numerically better clinical outcomes than erlotinib.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

UMIN000005308.

Efficacy of icotinib in lung squamous-cell cancer: A real-world experience from single institution

AIM

Squamous cell carcinoma is a less common type of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which associates with a poor clinical prognosis and lacks specific therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of icotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has proven to be effective in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, in patients with lung squamous-cell cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted in patients who had advanced lung squamous-cell cancer confirmed by cytology or histology. Patients were treated orally with icotinib (125 mg, three times daily) until event of unacceptable toxicity, disease progression or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall response rate and disease control rate.

RESULTS

Between January 2014 and May 2016, 20 patients were enrolled and evaluated for the efficacy and safety of icotinib. Overall, the median overall survival and progression-free survival were 9.93 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.46-16.40) and 3.0 months (95% CI: 0.00-8.35), respectively. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 20% and 70%, respectively. For treatment-naive patients (n = 11), the overall survival and progression-free survival were 9.93 months (95% CI: 0.00-23.49) and 6.27 months (95% CI: 0.00-12.61); the response rate and disease control rate were 27.3% and 54.5%, respectively. The overall survival and progression-free survival of patients treated with second- or multiple-line icotinib treatment (n = 9) were 6.5 months (95% CI: 0.80-12.20) and 1.2 months (95% CI: 1.10-1.30). A total of 11 patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event, most of which were mild to moderate. The most common manifestations were rash (n = 6, 30%) followed by diarrhea (n = 2, 10%).

CONCLUSION

Icotinib has demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with advanced lung squamous-cell cancer.

Low-dose Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition of EGFR Mutation-positive Lung Cancer: Therapeutic Benefits and Associations Between Dosage, Efficacy and Body Surface Area

A key drug for treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer is epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). While the dosage of many general anti-tumor drugs is adjusted according to the patient body surface area, one uniform dose of most TKIs is recommended regardless of body size. In many cases, dose reduction or drug cessation is necessary due to adverse effects. Disease control, however, is frequently still effective, even after dose reduction. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the characteristics of 26 patients at Fukuoka University Hospital between January 2004 and January 2015 in whom the EGFR-TKI dose was reduced with respect to progression free survival and overall survival. There were 10 and 16 patients in the gefitinib group and the erlotinib group, respectively. The median progression-free survival in the gefitinib group and the erlotinib group was 22.4 months and 14.1 months, respectively, and the median overall survival was 30.5 months and 32.4 months, respectively. After stratification of patients by body surface area, the overall median progression-free survival was significantly more prolonged in the low body surface area (<1.45 m2) group (25.6 months) compared to the high body surface area (>1.45 m2) group (9.7 months) (p=0.0131). These results indicate that low-dose EGFR-TKI may sufficiently control disease without side effects in lung cancer patients with a small body size.

Advances in EGFR as a Predictive Marker in Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, lung cancer is the most common cause of mortality. Toxins from tobacco smoke are known to increase the risk of lung cancer; however, up to 15% of lung cancer-related deaths in men and up to 50% of lung cancer-related deaths in women occur in people who do not smoke. Despite the fact that chemotherapy generally provides a survival benefit for non-small-cell lung cancer, not every patient will respond to therapy and many experience therapy-related adverse events. Thus, predictive markers are used to determine which patients are more likely to respond to a given regimen.

METHODS

We reviewed the current medical literature in English relating to predictive markers that may be positive, such as the presence of an activating EGFR mutation.

RESULTS

The advances in using EGFR as a molecular predictive marker were summarized. This biomarker influences therapeutic response in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Clinical evidence supporting its value is also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of EGFR as a predictive factor in lung adenocarcinoma may help target therapy to individual tumors to achieve the best likelihood for long-term survival and to avoid adverse events from medications unlikely to be effective.

Long progression-free survival with afatinib in a patient with heavily pretreated lung adenocarcinoma without common activating EGFR mutations

Here we report the case of a female Caucasian patient with advanced NSCLC who responded to afatinib after numerous previous lines of treatment. Despite likely being EGFR wild-type, she had attained two long-lasting progression-free intervals with erlotinib but eventually relapsed. After 7 years with various treatments, including EGFR inhibitor erlotinib, she started treatment with afatinib in March 2012. The patient was able to recover from the complete atelectasis present at the start of treatment and was able to lead a normal active life. Toxicities were mild and controllable with medication and reduction of afatinib dose. The patient remained symptom- and progression-free for 31 months.

Tyr1068-phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) predicts cancer stem cell targeting by erlotinib in preclinical models of wild-type EGFR lung cancer

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown strong activity against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, a fraction of EGFR wild-type (WT) patients may have an improvement in terms of response rate and progression-free survival when treated with erlotinib, suggesting that factors other than EGFR mutation may lead to TKI sensitivity. However, at present, no sufficiently robust clinical or biological parameters have been defined to identify WT-EGFR patients with greater chances of response. Therapeutics validation has necessarily to focus on lung cancer stem cells (LCSCs) as they are more difficult to eradicate and represent the tumor-maintaining cell population. Here, we investigated erlotinib response of lung CSCs with WT-EGFR and identified EGFR phosphorylation at tyrosine1068 (EGFRtyr1068) as a powerful biomarker associated with erlotinib sensitivity both in vitro and in preclinical CSC-generated xenografts. In contrast to the preferential cytotoxicity of chemotherapy against the more differentiated cells, in EGFRtyr1068 cells, erlotinib was even more active against the LCSCs compared with their differentiated counterpart, acquiring potential value as CSC-directed therapeutics in the context of WT-EGFR lung cancer. Although tumor growth was inhibited to a similar extent during erlotinib or chemotherapy administration to responsive tumors, erlotinib proved superior to chemotherapy in terms of higher tolerability and reduced tumor aggressiveness after treatment suspension, substantiating the possibility of preferential LCSC targeting, both in adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) tumors. We conclude that EGFRtyr1068 may represent a potential candidate biomarker predicting erlotinib response at CSC-level in EGFR-WT lung cancer patients. Finally, besides its invariable association with erlotinib sensitivity in EGFR-WT lung CSCs, EGFRtyr1068 was associated with EGFR-sensitizing mutations in cell lines and patient tumors, with relevant diagnostic, clinical and therapeutic implications.

Retrospective efficacy and safety analyses of erlotinib, pemetrexed, and docetaxel in EGFR-mutation-negative patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Several guidelines recommend erlotinib, pemetrexed, or docetaxel for second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib, pemetrexed, and docetaxel in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-negative patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the efficacy of these agents in patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous NSCLC who had EGFR wild-type tumors, performance status (PS) of 0, 1, or 2 and received erlotinib, pemetrexed, or docetaxel between December 2007 and September 2011. Variability among patient backgrounds was evaluated using propensity scores to assess comparability. The efficacy of these agents was evaluated in patient subgroups with low variability.

RESULTS

The propensity scores showed that the backgrounds of the groups that received second-line therapy with each agent had low variability and were adequate for comparison. Patients were divided into the PS0/1 and PS2 groups for analysis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with erlotinib was 2.8 months in the PS0/1 group, as compared with 1.0 month in the PS0/1/2 group and 0.90 months in the PS2 group. PFS in PS0/1 patients who received erlotinib was comparable to that in PS0/1 patients who received pemetrexed (2.5 months) or docetaxel (1.9 months). Overall survival (OS) in erlotinib-, pemetrexed-, and docetaxel-treated PS0/1 patients was 16.1, 7.4 and 10.0 months, respectively. The study had limited power to detect differences in PFS and OS because of the small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Erlotinib appears to be a useful second-line option in PS0/1 patients with EGFR mutation-negative advanced non-squamous NSCLC given its mild adverse effects. The results should be carefully interpreted because of the small sample size, limited power, and retrospective nature of the study.

A phase II trial of erlotinib monotherapy for pretreated elderly patients with advanced EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which is an effective treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially those harboring activating EGFR mutations. A previous phase III trial suggested that patients with EGFR wild-type (EGFR-wt) NSCLC or elderly patients with disease progression after cytotoxic chemotherapy might benefit from erlotinib monotherapy. However, few studies have prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of second- or third-line erlotinib monotherapy for elderly patients with EGFR-wt advanced or recurrent NSCLC.

METHODS

Pretreated patients aged ≥70 years with EGFR-wt stage IIIB/IV NSCLC or those with postoperative recurrence were enrolled and received oral erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/day until disease progression. Primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile.

RESULTS

This study was terminated early because of the results from a Japanese phase III trial (DELTA trial). Sixteen patients were enrolled between April 2010 and May 2013. The median age was 78 years (range 70-84 years). Six patients were female. Five patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0. Eleven (69%) patients had adenocarcinoma. Fifteen (94%) patients were treated with erlotinib as a second-line therapy. The ORR was 0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-17.1]. DCR was 56.3% (95% CI 33.2-76.9). The median PFS and OS were 1.7 months (95% CI 1.3-2.2) and 7.2 months (95% CI 5.6-8.7), respectively. The most commonly occurring adverse events included acneiform eruption (31.3%) and skin rash (25.0%). One patient developed grade 3 interstitial lung disease, which improved following steroid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In pretreated elderly patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-wt NSCLC, daily oral erlotinib was well tolerated; however, administration of the drug should not be considered as a second line therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000004561 (Date of registration: November 15th, 2010).

Effects of cigarette smoking on metabolism and effectiveness of systemic therapy for lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cigarette smoke associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons can induce key drug-metabolizing enzymes of cytochrome P450 and isoforms of the glucuronyl transferases families. These enzymes metabolize several systemic therapies for lung cancer. Induction of these enzymes may lead to accelerated clearance with resultant impact on systemic therapy efficacy and toxicity in smokers compared with nonsmokers. This article reviews published literature regarding the influence of smoking as it relates to alteration of metabolism of systemic therapy in lung cancer.

METHODS

A structured search of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed/MEDLINE identified relevant articles. Data were abstracted and analyzed to summarize the findings.

RESULTS

Studies that analyzed pharmacokinetic data were prospective. Smokers receiving erlotinib exhibited rapid clearance, requiring a higher dose to reach equivalent systemic exposure compared with nonsmokers. Smokers receiving irinotecan also demonstrated increased clearance and lower systemic exposure. There was no difference in clearance of paclitaxel or docetaxel in smokers. Chemotherapy-associated neutropenia was worse in nonsmokers compared with smokers in patients treated with paclitaxel, docetaxel, irinotecan, and gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic therapy for lung cancer has a narrow therapeutic index such that small changes in plasma concentrations or exposure in smokers may result in suboptimal therapy and poor outcomes. Smoking cessation must be emphasized at each clinical visit. However, prospective trials should take into consideration the effects of smoking history on drug pharmacokinetics and efficacy. The metabolizing enzyme phenotype in smokers may require individualized dose algorithms for specific agents.

A phase II study of erlotinib monotherapy in pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR gene mutation who have never/light smoking history: re-evaluation of EGFR gene status (NEJ006/TCOG0903)

OBJECTIVES

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors are particularly effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring active EGFR mutations. However, some studies have reported survival benefits in NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR upon erlotinib treatment. This trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib monotherapy and investigate the predictive values of several biomarkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously treated NSCLC but without EGFR gene mutations that had never or light smoked were eligible for this study. Gene status screening was performed using the PNA-LNA PCR clamp method. Erlotinib was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred. EGFR gene status was re-evaluated using the fragment method to detect exon 19 deletions and the Cycleave-PCR method to detect point mutations. Expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), Met, and thymidylate synthase (TS) were evaluated using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were enrolled in the study between March 2010 and November 2011. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.2% and 41.3%. Re-evaluations for EGFR gene were performed in 32 tumor samples. EGFR gene mutations were found in eight samples (5:exon 19 deletion, 2:G719X, 1:L858R). Six patients had PR and two had SD among these eight patients. A total of 24 patients were confirmed as wild-type EGFR using different methods. ORR and DCR were 4.2% and 41.7%. The median progression free survival (PFS) and median survival times were 2.0 and 6.0 months, respectively. Patients with tumors expressing HGF showed shorter PFS but not MET or TS.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-examination of EGFR gene status using different detecting method or different sample should be considered to grasp a chance of erlotinib treatment after first line treatment. In confirmed EGFR wild NSCLC, negative HGF staining could be a biomarker for longer PFS by erlotonib treatment.

Impact of EGFR mutation detection methods on the efficacy of erlotinib in patients with advanced EGFR-wild type lung adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Methods used for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing vary widely. The impact of detection methods on the rates of response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-wild type (wt) lung adenocarcinoma patients is unknown.

METHODS

We recruited the Group-I patients to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib in patients with EGFR-wt lung adenocarcinoma by either direct sequencing (DS) or mutant type-specific sensitive (MtS) methods in six medical centers in Taiwan. Cross recheck of EGFR mutations was performed in patients who achieved objective response to erlotinib and had adequate specimens. The independent Group-II lung adenocarcinoma patients whose EGFR mutation status determined by DS were recruited to evaluate the potential limitations of three MtS methods.

RESULTS

In Group-I analysis, 38 of 261 EGFR-wt patients (14.6%) achieved partial response to erlotinib treatment. Nineteen patients (50.0%) had adequate specimens for cross recheck of EGFR mutations and 10 of them (52.6%) had changes in EGFR mutation status, 5 in 10 by DS and 5 in 9 by MtS methods originally. In Group-II analysis, 598 of 996 lung adenocarcinoma patients (60.0%) had detectable EGFR mutations. The accuracy rates of the three MtS methods, MALDI-TOF MS, Scorpions ARMS and Cobas, were 87.8%, 86.8% and 85.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant portion of the erlotinib responses in EGFR-wt lung adenocarcinoma patients were related to the limitations of detection methods, not only DS but also MtS methods with similar percentages. Prospective studies are needed to define the proper strategy for EGFR mutation testing.

Clinical utility of erlotinib for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in Japanese patients: current evidence

Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has been approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on Phase II clinical trials since 2002. Erlotinib, another EGFR-TKI, was also approved a few years thereafter. In 2004, activating mutations in the EGFR gene were discovered to be a predictive biomarker for EGFR-TKI treatment, and gefitinib, which is not effective for patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC, has since been used only in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. In contrast, erlotinib is potentially effective for the treatment of EGFR wild-type NSCLC. Similar to gefitinib, erlotinib is also effective for EGFR-mutated NSCLC and has been used as an initial treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Both gefitinib and erlotinib can be used in a Japanese clinical setting. The approved daily dose of erlotinib (150 mg) is equal to the maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib. In contrast, the daily dose of gefitinib has been set at 250 mg, which is approximately one-third of the maximum tolerated dose of gefitinib. Accordingly, a higher serum concentration can be achieved using erlotinib, compared with gefitinib. This advantage can be applied to the treatment of central nervous system metastases (brain metastasis and carcinomatous meningitis), the treatment of which is complicated by the difficulty drugs have penetrating the blood-brain barrier. Although patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC respond dramatically to EGFR-TKIs, some patients have a poor response and the majority eventually undergo disease progression. To overcome such resistance, several novel treatment strategies, such as combination therapy and next-generation EGFR-TKIs, have been attempted.

Phase II study of erlotinib for previously treated patients with EGFR wild-type non-small-cell lung cancer, following EGFR mutation status reevaluation with the Scorpion Amplified Refractory Mutation System

While assessing the efficacy of erlotinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type (WT) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the sensitivity of the method used for the EGFR mutation analysis may affect the evaluation of the efficacy. We conducted a phase II study of erlotinib for previously treated patients with EGFR WT NSCLC screened by the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid (PNA-LNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) clamp method, which is known to be highly sensitive. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Preplanned reevaluation of the EGFR genotype as an exploratory endpoint was performed using the Scorpion Amplification Refractory Mutation System (S-ARMS) assay. Erlotinib was administered daily until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. A total of 53 evaluable patients were enrolled. The histological subtypes were adenocarcinoma in 40 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in 9 patients and not otherwise specified NSCLC in 4 patients. Partial response (PR) was achieved in 6 patients (4 with adenocarcinoma and 2 with squamous cell carcinoma). The ORR was 11.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.3-23.0]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.2-2.3). Samples from 26 of the 53 patients (49.0%) were available for EGFR mutation reanalysis with the S-ARMS assay. Of these 26 samples, only 1 sample of adenocarcinoma was found to be EGFR mutation-positive (exon 19 deletion) and the patient achieved a PR. The EGFR WT genotype was reconfirmed by the S-ARMS assay in the remaining 25 patients and 2 of these patients exhibited a PR. This study did not meet the primary endpoint, although erlotinib was found to be moderately effective in pretreated patients with EGFR WT NSCLC, even when the EGFR mutational status was confirmed by the highly sensitive PNA-LNA clamp PCR method.

[Treatment progress for EGFR wild-type advanced non-small cell lung cancer]

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer in the world. The treatment remains one of the most challenging tasks in the medical world. The discovery and development of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) have had a major impact in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). But the efficacy of EGFR-TKI in EGFR wild-type patients is limited, and the limited EGFR mutation incidence also prompts researchers to study what is the best treatment choice for patients with NSCLC who are negative for EGFR mutations. This review will discuss the research status in treatment choice for EGFR wild-type NSCLC.

Erlotinib in African Americans with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study with genetic and pharmacokinetic analyses

Prospective studies on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in African Americans with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not previously been performed. In this phase II randomized study, 55 African Americans with NSCLC received 150 mg/day erlotinib or a body weight-adjusted dose with subsequent escalations to the maximum-allowable dose, 200 mg/day, to achieve rash. Erlotinib and OSI-420 exposures were lower than those observed in previous studies, consistent with CYP3A pharmacogenetics implying higher metabolic activity. Tumor genetics showed only two EGFR mutations, EGFR amplification in 17/47 samples, eight KRAS mutations, and five EML4-ALK translocations. Although absence of rash was associated with shorter time to progression (TTP), disease-control rate, TTP, and 1-year survival were not different between the two dose groups, indicating the dose-to-rash strategy failed to increase clinical benefit. Low incidence of toxicity and low erlotinib exposure suggest standardized and maximum-allowable dosing may be suboptimal in African Americans.

Factor associated with failure to administer subsequent treatment after progression in the first-line chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group experience

PURPOSE

Early administration of both epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy is crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. We investigated the effect of first-line administration of these therapies on subsequent therapy in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

This study enrolled 63 consecutive patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC and good performance status (PS) and who underwent first-line EGFR-TKI therapy or standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and then had progressive disease, from 2007 to 2011. The ability of each patient to receive the other therapy after first-line treatment failure was assessed.

RESULTS

In the first-line setting, 23 and 40 patients received EGFR-TKI therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, respectively. At relapse, the EGFR-TKI therapy group showed more frequent PS deterioration (p = 0.042) and greater likelihood of symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) relapse (p = 0.093) compared with the cytotoxic chemotherapy group. Nine (39 %) of 23 patients initially receiving EGFR-TKI therapy could not receive standard cytotoxic therapy after progression mainly due to symptomatic CNS relapse. Only one (3 %) of 40 initially treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy failed to receive subsequent EGFR-TKI therapy (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a correlation between the first-line therapy and the failure to switch to the other therapy after disease progression (OR 48.605, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

In this study, patients who could not receive both EGFR-TKI therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy in the early-line setting were included more in the first-line EGFR-TKI group, suggesting a potential risk associated with missing the timing of administration of subsequent therapy. Further investigation is warranted to detect their pretreatment clinical or molecular characteristics for development of a new treatment strategy specific for such subpopulation.

Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of erlotinib and pharmacogenomic analysis of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid drug concentrations in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Erlotinib shows large inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability, but the impact of early drug exposure and genetic variations on the clinical outcomes of erlotinib remains fully investigated. The primary objective of this study was to clarify the population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of erlotinib in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The secondary objective was to identify genetic determinant(s) for the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) permeability of erlotinib and its active metabolite OSI-420.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients treated with erlotinib (150 mg/day) were enrolled, and CSF samples were available from 23 of these patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Plasma and CSF concentrations of erlotinib and OSI-420 were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling program NONMEM. Germline mutations including ABCB1 (1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T), ABCG2 (421C>A), and CYP3A5 (6986A>G) polymorphisms, as well as somatic EGFR activating mutations if available, were examined. Early exposure to erlotinib and its safety/efficacy relationship were evaluated.

RESULTS

The apparent clearance of erlotinib and OSI-420 were significantly decreased by 24 and 35 % in patients with the ABCG2 421A allele, respectively (p < 0.001), while ABCB1 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms did not affect their apparent clearance. The ABCG2 421A allele was significantly associated with increased CSF penetration for both erlotinib and OSI-420 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the incidence of grade ≥2 diarrhea was significantly higher in patients harboring this mutant allele (p = 0.035). A multivariate logistic regression model showed that erlotinib trough (C0) levels on day 8 were an independent risk factor for the development of grade ≥2 diarrhea (p = 0.037) and skin rash (p = 0.031). Interstitial lung disease (ILD)-like events occurred in 3 patients (3.4 %), and the median value of erlotinib C0 levels adjacent to these events was approximately 3 times higher than that in patients who did not develop ILD (3253 versus 1107 ng/mL; p = 0.014). The objective response rate in the EGFR wild-type group was marginally higher in patients achieving higher erlotinib C0 levels (≥1711 ng/mL) than that in patients having lower erlotinib C0 levels (38 versus 5 %; p = 0.058), whereas no greater response was observed in the higher group (67 %) versus the lower group (77 %) within EGFR mutation-positive patients (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

ABCG2 can influence the apparent clearance of erlotinib and OSI-420, and their CSF permeabilities in patients with NSCLC. Our preliminary findings indicate that early exposure to erlotinib may be associated with the development of adverse events and that increased erlotinib exposure may be relevant to the antitumor effects in EGFR wild-type patients while having less of an impact on the tumor response in EGFR mutation-positive patients.

EGFR mutation frequency and effectiveness of erlotinib: a prospective observational study in Danish patients with non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

In 2008, we initiated a prospective study to explore the frequency and predictive value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in an unselected population of Danish patients with non-small cell lung cancer offered treatment with erlotinib, mainly in second-line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred and eighty eight patients with advanced NSCLC were included. The mutation status was assessed using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test. Erlotinib was administrated (150 mg/d) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and response.

RESULTS

Biopsies were retrieved from 467 patients, and mutation results obtained for 462. We identified 57 (12%) patients with EGFR mutations: 33 exon 19 deletions, 13 exon 21 mutations, 5 exon 18 mutations, 3 exon 20 insertions, 1 exon 20 point mutation (S768I), and two complex mutations. Seven percent of the patients were never smokers. The differences in median progression-free survival and overall survival between the mutated group and the wild-type group were 8.0 vs. 2.5 months, p<0.001 and 12.1 vs. 3.9 months, p<0.001. Performance status (0-1 vs. 2-3) and line of treatment (1st vs. 2nd and 3rd) had no influence on outcome in EGFR-mutated patients.

CONCLUSION

We found a higher frequency of EGFR mutations than expected in a cohort with less than 10% never smokers. The outcome after treatment with erlotinib was much better in patients with EGFR mutations than in patients with wild-type EGFR and was independent of performance status and treatment line in EGFR-mutated patients.

Serum proteomic study on EGFR-TKIs target treatment for patients with NSCLC

Background

Although epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely used for EGFR mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, tumor sample availability and heterogeneity of the tumor remain challenging for physicians’ selection of these patients. Here, we developed a serum proteomic classifier based on matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) to predict the clinical outcome of patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.

Method

A total of 68 patients were included in this study. All patients received EGFR-TKIs as second or third line treatment and blood samples were collected before treatment. Using magnetic bead assisted serum peptide capture coupled to MALDI-TOF-MS, pretreatment serum from 24 NSCLC patients was analyzed to develop a proteomic classifier (training set). In a blinded test set with 44 patients, each sample was classified into “good” or “poor” groups using this classifier. Survival analysis of each group was done based on this classification.

Result

A 3-peptide proteomic classifier was developed from the training set. In the testing set, the classifier was able to distinguish patients of “good” or “poor” outcomes with 93% accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The overall survival and progression free survival of the predicted good group were found to be significantly longer than the poor group, not only in the whole population but also in certain subgroups, such as pathological adenocarcinoma and nonsmokers. With respect to the tumor samples available for EGFR mutation detection, all eight EGFR mutant tumors and three of the 12 wild type EGFR tumors were classified as good while nine of the 12 wild type EGFR tumors were classified as poor.

Conclusion

The current study has shown that a proteomic classifier can predict the outcome of patients treated with EGFR-TKIs and may aid in patient selection in the absence of available tumor tissue. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

[Personalized targeted therapy for lung cancer]

由于每一肺癌患者在临床特征、预后、治疗反应和耐受性方面的进展都是独特的，所以肺癌被认为是异质性疾病。个体化用药是指运用标志物来预测哪些患者更易获益于某种治疗。对于肺癌而言，日趋完善的表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR)和新发现的棘皮动物微管相关蛋白样4-间变淋巴瘤激酶(echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase, EML4-ALK)是重要的治疗靶标。本综述包括EGFR和EML4-ALK活化的机制、预测性生物标记物、耐药的机理和已有的靶向性酪氨酸激酶抑制剂。本文将通过总结基于生物标记物筛选患者而进行的前瞻性临床试验来探讨EGFR和ALK靶向治疗的疗效。此外，由于革命性的测序和系统生物学技术会为癌症的分子特征提供一个全面的理解，有助于为更适宜靶向治疗的患者提供更精确的区分从而提供更有前景的个体化治疗，本综述也将包括这些技术。同时，非亚裔人群中EGFR和ALK相对较低的突变发生率和突变患者反应的缺乏限制了靶向于EGFR或ALK的治疗的应用。测序和系统生物学策略则可能为这些患者提供新的解决方案。

Phase II study of pemetrexed plus intermittent erlotinib combination therapy for pretreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with documentation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status

INTRODUCTION

Erlotinib and pemetrexed have been approved for the second-line and maintenance treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the recommended doses determined by our previous phase I study, we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination of the two agents in pretreated non-squamous NSCLC patients.

METHODS

This study was performed in patients with stage IIIB/IV or post-surgically recurrent non-squamous NSCLC whose disease had progressed on or after receiving first-line chemotherapy. Patients received 500 mg/m(2) of intravenous pemetrexed every 21 days and 150 mg of oral erlotinib on days 2-16 until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The expected response rate and threshold were defined as 33.5% and 10%, respectively. Assuming a one-sided alpha of 5%, a power of 80%, the possible deviation from assessment, 26 patients were necessary.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients, 16 males and 11 females were recruited. Patients had the median age of 70 years (range, 48-80 years) and included 21 stage IV diseases, 22 adenocarcinomas. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were examined in all patients. One patient had positive EGFR mutation, but the other 26 patients had wild-type EGFR. The median number of treatment courses was 3 (range, 1 to over 19). The best overall response rate and disease control rate were 11.1% and 63.0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI); 1.9-7.5 months) and 15.8 months (95% CI; 9.3 months to not available), respectively. Dermal, hepatic, gastrointestinal and hematological disorders were the frequently observed adverse events. One patient experienced grade 3 drug-induced interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not demonstrate the add-on effect of intermittent erlotinib on pemetrexed in a second-line setting for patients with non-squamous NSCLC without EGFR mutations.

Impact of physical size on gefitinib efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

Gefitinib is an essential drug for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations. The approved dosage is 250 mg/body/day without adjustment for physical size such as body surface area (BSA), and the impact of physical size on the efficacy of gefitinib has not been evaluated. Here, we sought to clarify this issue using a retrospective cohort. We reviewed the medical records of patients with consecutive advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who underwent gefitinib monotherapy at Okayama University Hospital. In total, 101 patients were included in this study, and the median BSA in this cohort was 1.5 m(2). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with higher BSA (≥1.5 m(2)) was significantly worse than that of those with lower BSA (< 1.5 m(2)) (10.4 vs. 18.0 months; p = 0.019, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis also showed a significant impact of BSA on PFS (hazards ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-2.89; p = 0.002). By contrast, no significant association between BSA and PFS was observed in those undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (4.0 vs. 5.1 months; p = 0.989, log-rank test), suggesting that BSA is a predictive, rather than a prognostic, marker for gefitinib therapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. In conclusion, BSA affected PFS in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who underwent gefitinib monotherapy, suggesting the need for appraisal of BSA-based dose adjustment, even for this molecular target-based therapy.

The management of skin toxicity during erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: how much does it cost?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to estimate the costs for the foreseeable management of skin toxicity (papulo-pustular reactions) in patients treated with erlotinib for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in order to value the direct medical economical impact. No studies like the above have been published until now.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with NSCLC treated with erlotinib at Clinical Oncology Unit of University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy from June 2007 to May 2011. We evaluated severity and median duration of papulo-pustular reactions for each grade and we identified costs for the different therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

We evaluated 25 patients. Median time follow-up was 18.65 months (range 5.69-88.36). Finally, follow-up 7 patients (28.0%) were alive with metastases and 18 patients (72.0%) were deceased. Nineteen patients (76.0%) developed papulo-pustular reactions: 2 patients (10.5%) mild rash, 11 patients (57.9%) moderate rash and 6 patients (31.6%) severe rash; no case of hospitalization was observed. Median duration of mild rash was 97 days (costs-range: 157.7-452.2 €), median duration of moderate rash was 89 days (costs-range: 438.7-1035.6 €) and median duration of severe rash was 34 days (costs-range: 460.3-1057.2 €).

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience, though the analysis of not selected case study, showed that management of skin toxicities related to erlotinib is not so expensive, especially for low grade; therefore, we also recommended to give particular attention to low grade of toxicities for reducing progression to high grade and consequent risk of hospitalization, which really impact on costs.

Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib following Gefitinib-Induced Hepatotoxicity: Review of 8 Clinical Cases

Objective. Gefitinib often induces liver damage. A few reports have described that the subsequent administration of erlotinib was associated with less hepatotoxicity, but the safety and efficacy of this treatment are still not fully investigated. Therefore, we evaluated retrospectively the patients with erlotinib following gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. Methods and Patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records between December 2007 and March 2010. The patients were evaluated including the following information: age, gender, histology of lung cancer, performance status, smoking status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, liver metastasis, viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver injury, clinical response, and hepatotoxicity due to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Results. We identified 8 patients with erlotinib following gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. All achieved disease control by gefitinib. Hepatotoxicity was grades 2 and 3 in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. The median duration of treatment with gefitinib was 112.5 days and the median time to gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity was 51.5 days. The median duration of treatment with erlotinib was 171.5 days. Grade 1 and 2 erlotinib-induced hepatotoxicity was observed in 2 and 1 patient, respectively. Conclusions. Erlotinib administration with careful monitoring is thought to be a good alternative strategy for patients who respond well to gefitinib treatment but experience hepatotoxicity.

Role of erlotinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: clinical outcomes in wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor patients

Erlotinib is an orally administered small molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase. Erlotinib at the standard oral daily dose of 150 mg is approved for the treatment of unselected chemorefractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients as well as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy. The European Medicines Agency has recently also approved erlotinib as the first-line therapy in patients with EGFR mutations. Although recent studies have identified higher response rates and improved survival with erlotinib in a subset of patients with EGFR mutations, the survival benefit from single agent erlotinib in chemorefractory patients and in the maintenance setting is well observed in EGFR wild-type patients. The role of single agent erlotinib in the first-line setting in special subsets of EGFR wild-type patients (elderly, poor performance status, non-smokers) needs to be further determined. The combination of erlotinib with other targeted therapies has shown promising results and warrants further studies in EGFR wild-type patients.

Personalized targeted therapy for lung cancer

Lung cancer has long been recognized as an extremely heterogeneous disease, since its development is unique in every patient in terms of clinical characterizations, prognosis, response and tolerance to treatment. Personalized medicine refers to the use of markers to predict which patient will most likely benefit from a treatment. In lung cancer, the well-developed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the newly emerging EML4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are important therapeutic targets. This review covers the basic mechanism of EGFR and EML4-ALK activation, the predictive biomarkers, the mechanism of resistance, and the current targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The efficacy of EGFR and ALK targeted therapies will be discussed in this review by summarizing the prospective clinical trials, which were performed in biomarker-based selected patients. In addition, the revolutionary sequencing and systems strategies will also be included in this review since these technologies will provide a comprehensive understanding in the molecular characterization of cancer, allow better stratification of patients for the most appropriate targeted therapies, eventually resulting in a more promising personalized treatment. The relatively low incidence of EGFR and ALK in non-Asian patients and the lack of response in mutant patients limit the application of the therapies targeting EGFR or ALK. Nevertheless, it is foreseeable that the sequencing and systems strategies may offer a solution for those patients.

Impact of specific mutant KRAS on clinical outcome of EGFR-TKI-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with an EGFR wild type genotype

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the impact of specific mutant KRAS on clinical outcome to either gefitinib or erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, EGFR-TKI) in patients with EGFR wild type (WT) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with an EGFR WT genotype who were treated with an EGFR-TKI for advanced disease at our Institution were identified. Simultaneous availability of KRAS mutation status was required for study inclusion.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were eligible. Median age was 60 years (39-84), and 10 patients (14.9%) had received an EGFR-TKI as upfront therapy. Overall, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.9 months and 18.0 months, respectively. KRAS mutant patients (n=18) experienced a significantly shorter PFS compared with those carrying a KRAS WT genotype (n=49) (1.6 months vs 3.0 months, respectively, P=0.04; HR=1.92). However, within the KRAS mutant group a great variability in terms of sensitivity to treatment was noted (PFS ranging from 0.7 months to 38.7 months). KRAS codon 13 mutant patients (n=4) experienced the worse outcome when compared with KRAS codon 12 mutants (n=14) and KRAS WT patients (P<0.0001 and P=0.01 for PFS and OS, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Though we found that EGFR WT/KRAS mutant advanced NSCLC patients are associated with an increased resistance to treatment, specific mutant KRAS may account for differential sensitivity to an EGFR-TKI. KRAS codon 13 mutants are those who seem to experience the worse clinical outcome.

Retrospective study of erlotinib in patients with advanced squamous lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The effective targeted therapy for lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is needed. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation rate is low in lung SCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the status of erlotinib treatment and EGFR mutation in lung SCC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled lung cancer patients with SCC histology and history of erlotinib treatment. The primary objective was to assess overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) and the secondary objective was to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). EGFR mutations were assessed in parts of patients using both direct sequencing and protein nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PNA-LNA PCR) clamp methods.

RESULTS

In total, 92 patients were analyzed (75 men and 17 women, median age 69 years, and 74 current or former smokers). Sixteen patients achieved partial response and 9 had stable disease. The ORR was 17.4% and the DCR was 27.2%. The PFS and OS were longer in patients with disease control than with progressive disease (PFS 7.8 versus 1.3 months and OS 20.7 versus 2.7 months, both p<0.0001). The 1-year survival rate was 21.7%. In 27 patients with adequate specimens for molecular analysis (including 4 PR and 4 SD), two (7.4%) had EGFR complex mutations. One patient experienced response to erlotinib and the other did not.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of lung SCC patients would derive a clinical benefit from erlotinib treatment. The relatively higher response rate than the EGFR mutation rate in present study needs further evaluation.

Safety profiles of erlotinib therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Erlotinib is an orally available, small-molecule EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It has shown promising activity in chemotherapy-relapsed patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and is now approved in many countries. To date, there have been a number of clinical studies of erlotinib therapy demonstrating its safety as well as its efficacy. This article summarizes clinical study results in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, so that we can comprehensively understand the toxicities expected with erlotinib in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

A phase II trial of erlotinib in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

There is as yet no optimal treatment regimen for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene wild-type non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that has progressed despite cytotoxic chemotherapy. This trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR, in Japanese patients with EGFR wild-type tumors.

METHODS

Patients with stage III/IV or postoperative recurrence of NSCLC whose tumors have wild-type EGFR were eligible. Erlotinib (150 mg/day) was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary end point was disease control rate (DCR).

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (23 men and 8 women; median age, 71 years; range, 31-89) were enrolled between January 2008 and June 2011. Twenty-one had adenocarcinoma, nine had squamous cell carcinoma, and one had large cell carcinoma. Ten, nine, eight, and four patients showed performance status 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Erlotinib was administered following the median 3.1 regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapies. One patient achieved complete response, four showed partial response, and eight had stable disease. Thus, response rate was 17.2%, and DCR was 44.8%. Skin rash was the most common side effect (80.6%). Two patients developed interstitial lung disease. Nevertheless, all of these events were reversible, and there were no treatment-related deaths. The median progression-free survival and survival times were 2.1 and 7.7 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib might be an alternative option for patients resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy even in those with EGFR wild-type NSCLC.

Retrospective evaluation of the clinical benefit of long-term continuous use of zoledronic acid in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases

BACKGROUND

For patients with bone metastases, skeletal-related events including fracture are common, can cause considerable morbidity, and may reduce overall survival (OS). This retrospective analysis assessed the effect of Zometa (zoledronic acid, ZOL), an intravenous bisphosphonate (IV-BP), on fracture risk and OS in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer (LC). (Zometa is a registered trademark of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, USA.)

METHODS

A claims-based analysis using commercial and Medicare Advantage data from >45 US managed-care plans was used to evaluate the association between fracture risk and treatment persistency (31-90, 91-180, 181-365, and ≥366 days) and follow-up duration in LC patients diagnosed with bone metastases between 01/01/2001 and 12/31/2006 and treated with ZOL or without (no IV-BP). Persistency was defined as the absence of a >45-day gap between ZOL treatments. Analysis of variance tests were used to compare follow-up duration, a proxy for OS, between ZOL persistency groups. The effect of time to treatment with ZOL was also assessed.

RESULTS

In 9874 LC patients with bone metastases (n = 1090 ZOL; n = 8784 no IV-BP) the unadjusted relative fracture risk was reduced by 40% with ZOL vs no IV-BP; fracture risk decreased consistently with increasing duration of ZOL treatment. Even short-term (31-90 days) ZOL significantly reduced fracture risk (47%) vs no IV-BP (p = 0.005) with adjustment for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics. Delaying ZOL until after bone metastases were diagnosed significantly increased fracture risk (p = 0.0017). For a sub-set of patients included in a survival analysis (n = 550 ZOL; n = 4512 no IV-BP), mortality was significantly lower (mean, 38.6 vs 46.8 deaths/100 person-years; p = 0.038) in those treated with ZOL vs no IV-BP.

LIMITATIONS

Interpretation of this claims-based analysis must be tempered by the inherent limitations of observational data, such as limited clinical information and the ability to control for prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis demonstrates that LC patients with bone metastases receiving ZOL had significantly reduced risk of fracture (p = 0.005) and death (p < 0.038) vs patients receiving no IV-BP. Longer ZOL persistency consistently yielded better outcomes, with ≥12 months' treatment producing the greatest benefit.

Erlotinib for pretreated squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in Japanese patients

OBJECTIVE

Erlotinib has demonstrated survival benefit in patients with not only adenocarcinoma but also squamous cell carcinoma. Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors are more effective in Asian populations, including the Japanese than in western populations. However, a higher incidence of interstitial lung disease has been reported as a fatal adverse event in the Japanese population. There is little data on erlotinib for Japanese patients with pretreated squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and October 2010, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib administered as the first epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for 41 Japanese patients with pretreated squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease were carefully excluded by several examinations including high-resolution computed tomography.

RESULTS

The response rate and disease control rate were 9.7% [95% confidence interval: 2.7-23.1%) and 43.9% (95% confidence interval: 28.5-60.2%], respectively. Median time to treatment failure and overall survival were 2.2 months (95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.8 months) and 11.0 months (95% confidence interval: 5.7-15.7 months), respectively. Interstitial lung disease (Grade 5) was observed in one (2.4%) patient. Patients with Grade 0-1 skin rashes vs. patients with Grades 2-3 exhibited disease control rates of 28 vs. 83% (P = 0.0017), and median time to treatment failure of 1.2 months vs. 3.4 months (P = 0.0099).

CONCLUSIONS

Erlotinib has moderate efficacy for pretreated squamous cell carcinoma in Japanese patients. A higher grade of skin rash was associated with clinical benefit. Careful exclusion of pre-existing interstitial lung disease can minimize the occurrence of interstitial lung disease.

Phase II study of erlotinib as third-line monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

OBJECTIVE

There are few standard therapeutic options beyond second-line treatment. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib monotherapy as third-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

METHODS

In this phase II trial, patients who did not have epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and who had previously received two cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens containing platinum were treated with erlotinib (150 mg, per os) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were eligible for the assessment of efficacy and safety. Three cases showed a partial response, and eight cases showed stable disease with an overall response rate of 15.0% (95% confidence interval: 5.2-36.0%) and a disease control rate of 55.0% (95% confidence interval: 34.2-74.2%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival time were 2.1 and 6.7 months, respectively. Although dose reduction was required in one patient because of skin toxicity, grade 3/4 toxicity or pulmonary disease was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Erlotinib as third-line therapy showed an acceptable response rate, survival time and toxicity. It could be a potential third-line therapy for patients without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.