A multi-institution phase I/II trial of triweekly regimen with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Phase III study of cisplatin with or without S-1 in patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer

Background

This open-label phase III trial evaluated efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin vs. cisplatin alone as first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer.

Methods

Patients were randomised (1:1) to S-1 plus cisplatin (study group) or cisplatin alone (control group). In each cycle, cisplatin 50 mg/m² was administered on Day 1 in both groups. S-1 was administered orally at 80–120 mg daily on Days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle in the study group. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 375 patients were enrolled, of whom 364 (188, study group; 176, control group) received treatment. Median OS was 21.9 and 19.5 months in the study and control groups, respectively (log-rank P = 0.125; hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–1.05). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 and 4.9 months in the study and control groups, respectively (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48–0.80, P < 0.001). The adverse event (AE) rate increased in the study group despite the absence of any unexpected AEs.

Conclusions

S-1 plus cisplatin did not show superiority over cisplatin alone in OS but significantly increased PFS in patients with stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer. Since the standard therapy has changed in the course of this study, further studies are warranted to confirm the clinical positioning of S-1 combined with cisplatin for this population.

Prospective exploratory study of gemcitabine and S-1 against elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

A prospective study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of a combined regimen of gemcitabine and S-1 for the treatment of elderly patients (>70 years) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as a first-line setting based on the dosage recommended in a previous phase I study. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC received gemcitabine plus S-1. S-1 (40 mg/m²) was administered orally twice daily for 14 days while gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m²) was administered on days 1 and 15 of each cycle, and this regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. A total of 20 patients were included in the present study. Of these, 8 patients achieved an overall response rate of 40.0%, and the overall disease control rate was 65.0%. According to the histological type, the response rate in patients with NSCLC and adenocarcinoma was 38.5%, and that for non-adenocarcinoma was 42.9%. Progression-free survival and median survival times were 6.4 months and 17.8 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities observed were leukopenia (29%) and neutropenia (24%), while febrile neutropenia was not observed in any patient. The only non-hematological adverse event observed was grade 3 skin rash (10%). Therefore, the combination of gemcitabine and S-1 may be a promising and feasible regimen in the first-line setting for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy versus cisplatin alone with concurrent radiotherapy in Chinese patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer: A multicentre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin combined with concurrent radiotherapy (SCCCR) versus cisplatin alone combined with concurrent radiotherapy (CCCR) in Chinese patients with unresectable stage III nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2014, 72 eligible Chinese patients with NSCLC were included and randomly divided into 2 groups, each having 36 patients. Patients in the SCCCR group received S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent, radiotherapy. The other 36 patients in the CCCR group were administered cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy. The primary outcome was the overall response rate. The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.

RESULTS

The 3-year overall response rates for the SCCCR and CCCR groups were 60.1% and 53.3%, respectively (P = 0.041). The median OS was 35.1 (range, 6.5-47.2) months and 24.6 (range, 2.8-24.3) months for the SCCCR and CCCR groups, respectively (P = 0.016). The median PFS for the SCCCR and CCCR groups was 31.4 (range, 5.6-39.3) months and 22.3 (range, 2.4-36.5) months, respectively (P = 0.023). The toxicity profiles were similar for both groups.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of SCCCR was more encouraging compared to those of CCCR in Chinese NSCLC patients. In addition, the toxicities in both groups were tolerable.

Epidermal growth factor signals regulate dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status is associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the relationship between EGFR mutation status and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), a 5-FU degrading enzyme, is unknown.

METHODS

We elucidated the crosstalk among the EGFR signal cascade, the DPD gene (DPYD), and DPD protein expression via the transcription factor Sp1 and the effect of EGFR mutation status on the crosstalk.

RESULTS

In the PC9 (exon19 E746-A750) study, EGF treatment induced up-regulation of both Sp1 and DPD; gefitinib, an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), and mithramycin A, a specific Sp-1 inhibitor, suppressed them. Among EGFR-mutated (PC9, HCC827; exon19 E746-A750 and H1975; exon21 L858R, T790M, gefitinib resistant) and -non-mutated (H1437, H1299) cell lines, EGF administration increased DPYD mRNA expression only in mutated cells (p < 0.05). Accordingly, gefitinib inhibited DPD protein expression only in PC9 and HCC827 cells, and mithramycin A inhibited it in EGFR-mutated cell lines, but not in wild-type. FU treatment decreased the level of cell viability more in gefitinib-treated EGFR-TKI sensitive cell lines. Further, combination treatment of FU and mithramycin A suppressed cell viability even in a gefitinib resistant cell line.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGFR signal cascade regulates DPD expression via Sp1 in EGFR mutant cells. These results might be a step towards new therapies targeting Sp1 and DPD in NSCLC with different EGFR mutant status.

A randomized phase III trial of oral S-1 plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: TCOG0701 CATS trial

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based two-drug combination chemotherapy has been standard of care for patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary aim was to compare overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced NSCLC between the two chemotherapy regimens. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response, safety, and quality of life (QoL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and adequate organ function were randomized to receive either oral S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-21 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 8 every 4-5 weeks, or docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3-4 weeks, both up to six cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 608 patients from 66 sites in Japan were randomized to S-1 plus cisplatin (n = 303) or docetaxel plus cisplatin (n = 305). OS for oral S-1 plus cisplatin was noninferior to docetaxel plus cisplatin [median survival, 16.1 versus 17.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 1.013; 96.4% confidence interval (CI) 0.837-1.227]. Significantly higher febrile neutropenia (7.4% versus 1.0%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (73.4% versus 22.9%), grade 3/4 infection (14.5% versus 5.3%), and grade 1/2 alopecia (59.3% versus 12.3%) were observed in the docetaxel plus cisplatin than in the S-1 plus cisplatin. There were no differences found in PFS or response between the two arms. QoL data investigated by EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13 favored the S-1 plus cisplatin.

CONCLUSION

Oral S-1 plus cisplatin is not inferior to docetaxel plus cisplatin and is better tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

UMIN000000608.

S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy versus cisplatin alone with concurrent radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Background

We investigated the efficacy and safety of S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation (SCCR) over cisplatin alone plus concurrent thoracic radiation (CCR) for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Between January 2009 and November 2011, 40 eligible patients with NSCLC were included and divided randomly into two groups. Twenty patients received SCCR with S-1 (orally at 40 mg/m² per dose, b.i.d.) on days 1 through 14, cisplatin (60 mg/m² on day 1) every 4 weeks for two cycles, and radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions over 6 weeks) beginning on day 1. Twenty subjects received CCR (cisplatin and radiotherapy, the same as for SCCR).

Results

The 3-year overall response rate was 59.3% and 52.4% for the SCCR and CCR groups, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant, while the median overall survival was 33 months (range, 4–41 months) and 24 months (range, 2–37 months), respectively (P = 0.048). The median progression-free survival was 31 months for SCCR (range, 5–39 months), whereas it was 20 months (range, 2–37 months) for CCR (P = 0.037). The toxicity profile was similar in both groups.

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrated that S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation was more effective than cisplatin plus radiotherapy in NSCLC patients with acceptable toxicity.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trials Register: ChiCTR-TRC-13003997.

Phase II study of trastuzumab in combination with S-1 plus cisplatin in HER2-positive gastric cancer (HERBIS-1)

Background:

S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, plus cisplatin (SP) is a standard regimen for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in East Asia. To date, no studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with SP in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive AGC.

Methods:

Patients with HER2-positive AGC received S-1 (80–120 mg per day) orally on days 1–14, cisplatin (60 mg m⁻²) intravenously on day 1, and trastuzumab (course 1, 8 mg kg⁻¹; course 2 onward, 6 mg kg⁻¹) intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was response rate (RR); secondary end points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events.

Results:

A total of 56 patients were enrolled. In the full analysis set of 53 patients, the confirmed RR was 68% (95% confidence interval (CI)=54–80%), and the disease control rate was 94% (95% CI=84–99%). Median OS, PFS, and TTF were estimated as 16.0, 7.8, and 5.7 months, respectively. Major grade 3 or 4 adverse events included neutropaenia (36%), anorexia (23%), and anaemia (15%).

Conclusions:

Trastuzumab in combination with SP showed promising antitumour activity and manageable toxic effects in patients with HER2-positive AGC.

Phase II study of oral S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of oral S-1 in combination with cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

S-1 (50mg/m(2)) was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, with cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks, for 2-4 cycles. Thoracic radiation therapy was administered in 2 Gy fractions five times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was the response rate, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival and safety.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate was 87.8% (98% CI: 77.8-97.8%). The median progression-free survival was 467 days (15.4 months), and the median survival time was 904 days (29.7 months). The overall survival rates at 1- and 2-years were 85.7% and 52.9%, respectively. Hematological toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia (17%) and grade 3/4 leukopenia (27%). No grade 3 febrile neutropenia was detected, and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were also mild. A grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage was observed in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oral S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy is a promising treatment with a high efficacy and lower toxicity in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Clinical development of S-1 for non-small cell lung cancer: a Japanese perspective

For more than a decade, S-1 has been investigated aggressively against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. Recently, two randomized phase III trials of S-1 combined with cisplatin (CDDP) or carboplatin (CBDCA) compared with the standard platinum doublet chemotherapy were reported. S-1 and CDDP was noninferior to CDDP and DTX in terms of overall survival (OS) (median survival time [MST] 16.1 versus 17.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 1.013; 96.4% confidence interval [CI] 0.837-1.227). Noninferiority of S-1 and CBDCA compared with CBDCA and paclitaxel was also confirmed for OS (MST 15.2 versus 13.3 months, respectively; HR 0.928; 99.2% CI 0.671-1.283). The noninferiority design employed an upper CI limit of HR<1.322 in the former trial and HR<1.33 in the latter. S-1 combined with CDDP or CBDCA was thought to be one of the standard platinum doublet regimens in the first-line setting for patients with advanced NSCLC in Japan. Some additional interesting phase I and II studies have been published in Japan. They include studies of S-1 as first-line chemotherapy when combined with nonplatinum agents; as second-line chemotherapy; within chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease; and in the postoperative adjuvant setting. This review will also describe the use of S-1 for the treatment of NSCLC in these settings.

Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy of S-1/cisplatin for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using S-1 containing tegafur, an oral 5-FU prodrug, plus cisplatin has been reported to show promising efficacy against locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with acceptable toxicity. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of this induction treatment followed by surgery on survival for those patients.

METHODS

Potentially resectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients were eligible. The concurrent phase consisted of S-1 (orally at 40 mg/m² twice a day on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 36) and cisplatin (60 mg/m² on days 1 and 22) with radiation of 40 Gy/20 fractions beginning on day 1 followed by surgical resection.

RESULTS

Forty-two consecutive patients, between June 2005 and February 2011, were retrospectively analyzed. The median age was 59 (42 to 77) years, there were 34 males and 8 females, 26 cStage IIIA and 16 IIIB, each 21 adenocarcinomas and others. There were 26 partial responses and 16 stable disease cases after current induction treatment without uncontrollable toxicity. Of the 42 patients, 39 underwent surgical resection; 27 underwent a lobectomy and 12 pneumonectomies. One patient died due to thoracic empyema 65 days after surgery. The median follow-up time was 32.0 months. Three- and 5-year disease-free survival rates in all 39 resected patients were 52.0% and 44.0%, respectively, and 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 77.4% and 61.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgery may provide a better prognosis for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. Further prospective clinical investigation should be required.

Phase II study of oral S-1 plus cisplatin with bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin with bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients received S-1 plus cisplatin with bevacizumab. S-1 (80 mg/m(2)) was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 and every 3 weeks for 4-6 cycles. Patients with an objective response or stable disease received maintenance bevacizumab every 3 weeks until disease progression.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. The median number of chemotherapy was four (range, 1-6 cycles), and the median number of bevacizumab alone was three (range, 1-31 cycles). The grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropaenia (23%), thrombocytopaenia (10%), febrile neutropaenia (3%), hypertension (17%), pneumonia (7%), and bowel perforation (3%). The objective response rate was 71% (95% CI, 55-88%) for a disease control rate of 100%. The median progression-free and overall survival times were 7.0 months and 20.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus cisplatin with bevacizumab is an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with chemotherapy-naïve non-squamous NSCLC.

Feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 consisting of a 4-week administration and a two-week rest period in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has yet to be clarified, and the appropriate schedule for the adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 remains unknown. A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. Patients enrolled in this study were 20-75 years old, had pathological stage IB-IIIA NSCLC, and had received complete resection of NSCLC. S-1 (80 mg/m²) was administered orally to the patients for four weeks followed by a two-week rest period (conventional schedule), for a maximum of eight cycles. The primary endpoint was relative dose intensity (RDI), while the secondary endpoints were safety and 1 year of disease-free survival (1y-DFS). Between May 2007 and October 2009, 28 patients were enrolled. The RDI was 63.1% (95% CI, 48.6-77.7). No grade 3 or worse hematological toxicity was observed. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities were observed in four patients. No grade 4 or worse hematological toxicity was detected. The probability of 1y-DFS was 85.7% (95% CI, 72.8-98.6). In the subgroup analysis, the median RDI of patients over 65 years old was lower compared to the other patients (44.8 vs. 100%; P=0.013; Mann-Whitney U test). Creatinine clearance (CCr) was lower in the older group, with more grade 2 or 3 non-hematological toxicities in the elderly patients. These results suggest that the conventional schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is not likely to be feasible in older patients with completely resected NSCLC.

S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional phase II trial (West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 3706)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the combination chemotherapy using oral antimetabolite S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (RT) followed by the consolidation SP for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer, 20 to 74 years of age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 were eligible. The concurrent phase consisted of full dose S-1 (orally at 40 mg/m/dose twice daily, on days 1-14) and cisplatin (60 mg/m on day 1) repeated every 4 weeks for two cycles with RT delivered beginning on day 1 (60 Gy/30 fractions over 6 weeks). After SP-RT, patients received an additional two cycles of SP as the consolidation phase.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were registered between November 2006 and December 2007. Of the 50 patients for efficacy analysis, the median age was 64 years; male/female 40/10; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, 21/29; clinical stage IIIA/IIIB 18/32; and adenocarcinoma/others 20/30. There were 42 clinical responses including one complete response with an objective response rate of 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71-93%). The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 88% (95% CI, 75-94%) and 70% (95% CI, 55-81%), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 20 months. Of the 54 patients for safety analysis, common toxicities in the concurrent phase included grade 3/4 neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (9%), and grade 3 esophagitis (9%) and febrile neutropenia (9%). In one patient, grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in the consolidation phase. There were two treatment-related deaths caused by infection in the concurrent phase.

CONCLUSIONS

SP-RT showed a promising efficacy against locally advanced NCSLC with acceptable toxicity.

Long-term administration of second-line chemotherapy with S-1 and gemcitabine for platinum-resistant non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Standard second-line chemotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been established but have limited clinical relevance. S-1 is a recently developed agent with potential activity against NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed NSCLC recurrence after previous single- or two-regimen chemotherapy with platinum, performance status of 0 to 1, adequate organ functions, and measurable lesions were treated with S-1 (60 mg/m/d, twice a day) on days 1 to 14 and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) on days 8 and 15, which were repeated every 3 weeks until tumor progression.

RESULTS

Treatment was administered for a median of 4 courses (range, 1-13) over a median of 125-day period in 34 patients. The overall response rate was 23.5% (no complete response and eight partial response; 95% confidence interval: 9.1-38.0%). The median progression-free and overall survival times were 6.6 and 19.9 months, respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 58.8 and 30.9%, respectively. Toxicity was mild during the entire treatment period, except for three grade 3 interstitial pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

The primary end point was met with the relatively high overall response rate. Randomized phase III studies for elucidating survival outcome of the regimen are warranted.