Phase II study of pemetrexed and cisplatin, with chest radiotherapy followed by docetaxel in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:927-933. [PMID: 21415776 DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e3182156109]

Comparison of post-chemoradiotherapy pneumonitis between Asian and non-Asian patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pneumonitis is a common complication for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). It remains unclear whether there is ethnic difference in the incidence of post-CRT pneumonitis.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies from January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2023. The outcomes of interest were incidence rates of pneumonitis. The random-effect model was used for statistical analysis. This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023416490).

Findings

A total of 248 studies involving 28,267 patients were included. Among studies of CRT without immunotherapy, the pooled rates of pneumonitis for Asian patients were significantly higher than that for non-Asian patients (all grade: 66.8%, 95% CI: 59.2%-73.9% vs. 28.1%, 95% CI: 20.4%-36.4%; P < 0.0001; grade ≥2: 25.1%, 95% CI: 22.9%-27.3% vs. 14.9%, 95% CI: 12.0%-18.0%; P < 0.0001; grade ≥3: 6.5%, 95% CI: 5.6%-7.3% vs. 4.6%, 95% CI: 3.4%-5.9%; P = 0.015; grade 5: 0.6%, 95% CI: 0.3%-0.9% vs. 0.1%, 95% CI: 0.0%-0.2%; P < 0.0001). Regarding studies of CRT plus immunotherapy, Asian patients had higher rates of all-grade (74.8%, 95% CI: 63.7%-84.5% vs. 34.3%, 95% CI: 28.7%-40.2%; P < 0.0001) and grade ≥2 (34.0%, 95% CI: 30.7%-37.3% vs. 24.6%, 95% CI: 19.9%-29.3%; P = 0.001) pneumonitis than non-Asian patients, but with no significant differences in the rates of grade ≥3 and grade 5 pneumonitis. Results from subgroup analyses were generally similar to that from the all studies. In addition, the pooled median/mean of lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy and mean lung dose were relatively low in Asian studies compared to that in non-Asian studies.

Interpretation

Asian patients are likely to have a higher incidence of pneumonitis than non-Asian patients, which appears to be due to the poor tolerance of lung to radiation. Nevertheless, these findings are based on observational studies and with significant heterogeneity, and need to be validated in future large prospective studies focusing on the subject.

Funding

None.

Noncoding SNP at rs1663689 represses ADGRG6 via interchromosomal interaction and reduces lung cancer progression

A previous genome-wide association study (GWAS) revealed an association of the noncoding SNP rs1663689 with susceptibility to lung cancer in the Chinese population. However, the underlying mechanism is unknown. In this study, using allele-specific 4C-seq in heterozygous lung cancer cells combined with epigenetic information from CRISPR/Cas9-edited cell lines, we show that the rs1663689 C/C variant represses the expression of ADGRG6, a gene located on a separate chromosome, through an interchromosomal interaction of the rs1663689 bearing region with the ADGRG6 promoter. This reduces downstream cAMP-PKA signaling and subsequently tumor growth both in vitro and in xenograft models. Using patient-derived organoids, we show that rs1663689 T/T-but not C/C-bearing lung tumors are sensitive to the PKA inhibitor H89, potentially informing therapeutic strategies. Our study identifies a genetic variant-mediated interchromosomal interaction underlying ADGRG6 regulation and suggests that targeting the cAMP-PKA signaling pathway may be beneficial in lung cancer patients bearing the homozygous risk genotype at rs1663689.

Consolidation Systemic Therapy in Locally Advanced, Inoperable Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer-How to Identify Patients Which Can Benefit from It?

BACKGROUND

Consolidation systemic therapy (ST) given after concurrent radiotherapy (RT) and ST (RT-ST) is frequently practiced in locally advanced inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Little is known, however, about the fate of patients achieving different responses after concurrent phases of the treatment.

METHODS

we searched the English-language literature to identify full-length articles on phase II and Phase III clinical studies employing consolidation ST after initial concurrent RT-ST. We sought information about response evaluation after the concurrent phase and the outcome of these patient subgroups, the patterns of failure per response achieved after the concurrent phase as well as the outcome of these subgroups after the consolidation phase.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven articles have been initially identified, of which 20 studies were excluded for various reasons, leaving, therefore, a total of 67 studies for our analysis. Response evaluation after the concurrent phase was performed in 36 (54%) studies but in only 14 (21%) response data were provided, while in 34 (51%) studies patients underwent a consolidation phase regardless of the response. No study provided any outcome (survivals, patterns of failure) as per response achieved after the concurrent phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Information regarding the outcome of subgroups of patients achieving different responses after the concurrent phase and before the administration of the consolidation phase is still lacking. This may negatively affect the decision-making process as it remains unknown which patients may preferentially benefit from the consolidation of ST.

A network meta-analysis for efficacies and toxicities of different concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies and toxicities of different CCRT regimens in the treatment of LA-NSCLC by adopting a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

An exhaustive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted to identify relevant studies from inception to October 1, 2020. Direct and indirect evidence was combined to calculate the odds radios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as well as to plot the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. Cluster analyses were adopted to compare the efficacies and toxicities of different CCRT regimens according to the similarity of 2 variables. Publication bias was detected by comparison-adjusted funnel plots.

Results

Twenty-two studies were enrolled in this NMA, including 18 regimens: CCRT (cisplatin + etoposide), CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + carboplatin), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), CCRT (docetaxel + cisplatin), CCRT (S-1 + cisplatin), CCRT (mitomycin + vindesine + cisplatin), CCRT (cisplatin + vinorelbine), CCRT (cisplatin), CCRT (etoposide + cisplatin + amifostine), RT, CCRT (5-FU), CCRT (paclitaxel + cisplatin), CCRT (irinotecan + carboplatin), CCRT (nedaplatin), CCRT (carboplatin + etoposide), CCRT (paclitaxel), and CCRT (carboplatin). The results indicated that the regimens with CCRT (cisplatin + etoposide), CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), CCRT (S-1 + cisplatin), and CCRT (cisplatin + vinorelbine) had relatively better efficacies compared with other regimens. As for toxicities of different CCRT regimens, the CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel), CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin), and CCRT (docetaxel + cisplatin) were relatively lower.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin) and CCRT (carboplatin + paclitaxel) might be the best options for the treatment of LA-NSCLC, and CCRT (pemetrexed + cisplatin) had the highest 3-year overall survival (OS) rate.

Adding Base-Excision Repair Inhibitor TRC102 to Standard Pemetrexed-Platinum-Radiation in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Phase I Trial

PURPOSE

TRC102, a small-molecule base-excision repair inhibitor, potentiates the cytotoxicity of pemetrexed and reverses resistance by binding to chemotherapy-induced abasic sites in DNA. We conducted a phase I clinical trial combining pemetrexed and TRC102 with cisplatin-radiation in stage III nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients were enrolled from 2015 to 2019. The primary objective was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of TRC102 in combination with pemetrexed, cisplatin, and radiotherapy. Secondary objectives were to assess toxicity, tumor response, and progression-free survival at 6 months. Based on our preclinical experiments, pemetrexed-TRC102 was given on day 1, and cisplatin/radiotherapy was initiated on day 3. This schedule was duplicated in the second cycle. After completion, two additional cycles of pemetrexed-cisplatin were given. Toxicities were assessed using NCI CTACAE versions 4/5.

RESULTS

The median age was 69 years (45-79) with the median follow-up of 25.7 months (range, 7.9-47.4). No dose-limiting toxicities and no grade 5 toxicity were seen. Hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most common side effects. No clinical radiation pneumonitis was seen. Of 15 evaluable patients, three had complete response (20%), and 12 had partial response (80%). The 6-month progression-free survival was 80%, and the 2-year overall survival was 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed-TRC102 combined with cisplatin/radiotherapy in NS-NSCLC is safe and well tolerated. The recommended phase II dose is 200 mg TRC102 along with cisplatin-pemetrexed. No additional safety signal was seen beyond the expected CRT risks. A phase II trial, integrating post-CRT immunotherapy with this aggressive DNA-damaging regimen, is warranted.

Vinorelbine-Based Chemo-Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and background

Concomitant radio-chemotherapy improves survival of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, with a better local-regional control.

Methods and study design

We report our experience with vinorelbine-based chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and radical settings in 43 patients. Regimens consisted of cisplatin plus vinorelbine in 74.4% patients and carboplatin plus vinorelbine in 14.0%; 11.6% underwent mono-chemotherapy with oral vinorelbine. We estimated the crude probability of death or local recurrence by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression models were used to identify the main significant predictors of death or local recurrence.

Results

A significant effect of the response to treatment was shown on both local disease free-survival (P = 0.004) and overall survival (P <0.0001). Patients with progressive disease after primary treatment had a significantly higher risk of further relapse at both univariate (P = 0.046) and multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.014) than patients with a complete response. They also showed a significantly higher risk of death at both univariate (P = 0.0005) and multivariate regression analysis (P <0.0001) than patients with a complete response. The most common toxicity was hematologic and gastroenteric. We recorded grade III/IV leukopenia in 11%, anemia in 6%, and esophagitis in 14% of the patients.

Conclusions

Our experience showed that vinorelbine-based chemotherapy is an effective and safe regimen, in association with a platinum compound and thoracic radiotherapy.

Radiosensitization of non-small-cell lung cancer cells and xenografts by the interactive effects of pemetrexed and methoxyamine

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The anti-folate pemetrexed is a radiosensitizer. In pre-clinical models, pemetrexed is more effective along with the base-excision-repair inhibitor methoxyamine. We tested whether methoxyamine enhances pemetrexed-mediated radiosensitization of lung adenocarcinoma cells and xenografts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A549 and H1299 cells were evaluated for cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry, radiosensitization by clonogenic assay, and DNA repair by neutral comet assay and repair protein activation. H460 cells were included in some studies. Xenografts in nude mice received drug(s) and/or radiation, and tumor growth was monitored by caliper and in vivo toxicity by animal weight.

RESULTS

Exposure to pemetrexed/methoxyamine for 24 (H1299, H460) or 48 (A549)hours before irradiation resulted in accumulation of cells near the radiosensitive G1/S border; dose-enhancement factors of 1.62±0.19, 1.97±0.25, and 1.67±0.30, respectively; reduction of mean inactivation dose by 32%, 30%, and 46%, respectively; and significant reductions of SF2 and SF4 (p<0.05). Radiosensitization was associated with rapid DNA double-strand-break rejoining and increased levels of DNA-PKcs. Both tumor-growth rate and tumor-growth delay were significantly improved by adding methoxyamine to pemetrexed pre-irradiation (p<0.0001); no mice lost weight during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of methoxyamine to pemetrexed and fractionated radiotherapy may improve outcome for patients with locally advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Phase III study of cisplatin with pemtrexed or vinorelbine plus concurrent late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin with pemtrexed or vinorelbine and concurrent late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (LCAHRT). Patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to two regimens. The experimental (PP) arm included cisplatin, pemtrexed and concurrent LCAHRT based on bilateral lung V20 = 33%. The control (NP) arm used cisplatin, vinorelbine with the same radiotherapy protocol. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Median survival times were 26.0 months (95% CI 23.2 to 28.7 months) and 28.5 months (95% CI 17.1 to 39.9 months) for the NP and PP arms, respectively (P = 0.26). Median progression-free survival was 12.5 months and 17.5 months in the NP and PP arms (P = 0.07). In both arms of the study, there were no differences in overall survival between patients with squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC. The incidences of grade 3 or 4 toxicity were higher in NP than PP arm. With concurrent LCAHRT, pemetrexed/cisplatin was equally as efficacious as vinorelbine/cisplatin, but showed a more favorable toxicity profile.

PROCLAIM: Randomized Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed-Cisplatin or Etoposide-Cisplatin Plus Thoracic Radiation Therapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The phase III PROCLAIM study evaluated overall survival (OS) of concurrent pemetrexed-cisplatin and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) followed by consolidation pemetrexed, versus etoposide-cisplatin and TRT followed by nonpemetrexed doublet consolidation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIA/B unresectable nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer randomly received (1:1) pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 weeks for three cycles plus concurrent TRT (60 to 66 Gy) followed by pemetrexed consolidation every 3 weeks for four cycles (arm A), or standard therapy with etoposide 50 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) intravenously, every 4 weeks for two cycles plus concurrent TRT (60 to 66 Gy) followed by two cycles of consolidation platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (arm B). The primary objective was OS. The study was designed as a superiority trial with 80% power to detect an OS hazard ratio of 0.74 with a type 1 error of .05.

RESULTS

Enrollment was stopped early because of futility. Five hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned (301 to arm A, 297 to arm B) and 555 patients (283 in arm A, 272 in arm B) were treated. Arm A was not superior to arm B in terms of OS (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.20; median, 26.8 v 25.0 months; P = .831). Arm A had a significantly lower incidence of any drug-related grade 3 to 4 adverse events (64.0% v 76.8%; P = .001), including neutropenia (24.4% v 44.5%; P < .001), during the overall treatment period.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed-cisplatin combined with TRT followed by consolidation pemetrexed was not superior to standard chemoradiotherapy for stage III unresectable nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: Have we made any progress?

Lung cancer is responsible for the most cancer deaths worldwide with an incidence that is still rising. One third of patients have unresectable stage IIIA or stage IIIB disease. The standard of care for locally advanced disease in patients with good performance status consists of combined modality therapy in particular concurrent chemoradiotherapy. But despite a lot of efforts done in the past, local control and survival of patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor. Improving outcomes for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC has therefore been an area of ongoing research. Research has focused on improving systemic therapy, improving radiation therapy or adding a maintenance therapy to consolidate the initial therapy. Also implementation of newer targeted therapies and immunotherapy has been investigated as well as the option of prophylactic cranial irradiation. This article reviews the latest literature on improving local control and preventing distant metastases. It seems that we have reached a plateau with conventional chemotherapy. Radiotherapy dose escalation did not improve outcome although increasing radiation dose-intensity with new radiotherapy techniques and the use of newer agents, e.g., immunotherapy might be promising. In the future well-designed clinical trials are necessary to prove those promising results.

Genome-wide Association Study on Platinum-induced Hepatotoxicity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to improve the survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; the platinum-induced toxicity severely impedes the success of chemotherapy. Genetic variations, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), may contribute to patients’ responses to the platinum-based chemotherapy. To identify SNPs that modify the risk of hepatotoxicity in NSCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, we performed a genome-wide association scan in 334 subjects followed by a replication study among 375 subjects. Consistent associations with platinum-induced hepatotoxicity risk was identified for SNP rs2838566 located at 21q22.3, as the minor A allele could significantly increase the risk of liver injury (OR = 3.78, 95%CI = 1.99–7.19, P = 4.90 × 10⁻⁵ for GWAS scan, OR = 1.89, 95%CI = 1.03–3.46, P = 0.039 for replication, and OR = 2.56, 95%CI = 1.65–3.95, P = 2.55 × 10⁻⁵ for pooled population). These results suggested that genetic variants at 21q22.3 may contribute to the susceptibility of platinum-induced hepatotoxicity in NSCLC patients.

Final results from a Phase II study of pemetrexed and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation after Pem-Cis induction in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

OBJECTIVES

This single-arm multicenter Phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed (Pem) and cisplatin (Cis) induction chemotherapy (CT) followed by full-dose Pem-Cis plus concurrent radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with unresectable Stage III non-squamous NSCLC received two 21-day cycles of Pem 500 mg/m(2) (vitamin/folic acid supplementation and dexamethasone prophylaxis per Pem-label)+Cis 75 mg/m(2) on Day 1. Eligible patients who had not progressed continued with 2 further cycles of full-dose Pem-Cis plus concurrent RT (2 Gy/fraction, 5 days/week, 66 Gy total). Primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate.

RESULTS

Of 90 patients enrolled (all treated; median age 61 years, male/female 57%/43%, ECOG performance status 0/1 66%/34%, adenocarcinoma 90%, Stage III 36%/62%), 75 (83%) completed induction CT and started concurrent CT+RT. 64 (71%) patients received all 4 CT cycles and an RT dose ≥60 Gy. The 1-year PFS rate was 51.3% (95%CI: 42.0, 60.5). Median PFS was 10.6 months (95%CI: 8.6, 17.3), median OS was 26.2 months (95%CI: 16.7, not estimable). One patient died from enteritis (treatment-related) during Cycle 4. Four patients discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events, 1 on induction CT (renal failure), 3 on concurrent CT+RT (1 hypoacusis, 2 acute esophagitis). During induction CT, 18.9% of patients reported Grade 3/4 CTCAEs, only neutropenia (2.2%) and syncope (2.2%) were reported by >1 patient. During concurrent CT+RT, 41.3% of patients reported G3/4 CTCAEs, mainly esophagitis (12.0%), neutropenia (10.7%), and leukopenia (9.3%).

CONCLUSION

In this study of Pem-Cis induction CT followed by full-dose Pem-Cis with concurrent RT, median PFS was 10.6 months and toxicity was manageable, in line with previous data on Pem-Cis plus RT.

Concurrent pemetrexed and radiation therapy in the treatment of patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of completed and ongoing studies

Current standard for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is combined concurrent therapy with a platinum-based regimen. Preclinical synergistic activity of pemetrexed with radiation therapy (RT) and favorable toxicity profile has led to clinical trials evaluating pemetrexed in chemoradiation regimens. This literature search of concurrent pemetrexed and RT treatment of patients with stage III NSCLC included MEDLINE database, meeting abstracts, and the clinical trial registry database. Nineteen unique studies were represented across all databases including 11 phase I studies and eight phase II studies. Of the six phase II trials with mature data available, median overall survival ranged from 18.7 to 34 months. Esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in 0-16% and 0-23% of patients, respectively. Of the ongoing trials, there is one phase III and four phase II trials with pemetrexed in locally advanced NSCLC. Pemetrexed can be administered safely at full systemic doses with either cisplatin or carboplatin concomitantly with radical doses of thoracic radiation therapy. While results from the ongoing phase III PROCLAIM trial are needed to address definitively the efficacy of pemetrexed-cisplatin plus RT in stage III NSCLC, available results from phase II trials suggest that this regimen has promising activity with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Induction gemcitabine in standard dose or prolonged low-dose with cisplatin followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal combination of chemotherapy with radiation therapy for treatment locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an open issue. This randomized phase II study compared gemcitabine in two different schedules and cisplatin - as induction chemotherapy, followed by radiation therapy concurrent with cisplatin and etoposid.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had microscopically confirmed inoperable non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer; fulfilled the standard criteria for platin-based chemotherapy; and signed informed consent. Patients were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Two different aplications of gemcitabine were compared: patients in arm A received gemcitabine at 1250 mg/m(2) in a standard half hour i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8; patients in arm B received gemcitabine at 250 mg/m(2) in prolonged 6-hours i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8. In both arms, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 2 was administered. All patients continued treatment with radiation therapy with 60-66 Gy concurrent with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29 and 36 and etoposid 50 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29-33. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) after induction chemotherapy; secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

From September 2005 to November 2010, 106 patients were recruited to this study. No statistically signifficant differences were found in RR after induction chemotherapy between the two arms (48.1% and 57.4%, p = 0.34). Toxicity profile was comparable and mild with grade 3/4 neutropenia as primary toxicity in both arms. One patient in arm B suffered from acute peripheral ischemia grade 4 and an amputation of lower limb was needed. With a median follow-up of 69.3 months, progression-free survival and median survival in arm A were 15.7 and 24.8 months compared to 18.9 and 28.6 months in arm B. The figures for 1- and 3-year overall survival were 73.1% and 30.8% in arm A, and 81.5 % and 44.4% in arm B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the two cisplatin-based doublets of induction chemotherapy for inoperable NSCLC, both schedules of gemcitabine have a comparable toxicity profile. Figures for RR, PFS and OS are among the best reported in current literature. While there is a trend towards better efficacy of the treament with prolonged infusion of gemcitabine, the difference between the two arms did not reach statistical significance.

Superiority of concomitant chemoradiation over sequential chemoradiation in inoperable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: challenges in the selection of appropriate chemotherapy

Treatment of inoperable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach considering both local therapy and systemic therapy. Based on the results from several phase III studies and 2 meta-analyses, the use of concomitant chemoradiation therapy (ChRT) could significantly improve overall survival and is considered the standard of care in LA-NSCLC with good performance status. Currently, no evidence has shown a significant survival benefit of third-generation regimens applied in combination with ChRT compared with second-generation regimens. For regimens concomitant with radiation therapy, full-dose chemotherapy (such as cisplatin and etoposide or cisplatin and vinblastine) might be preferred. Additional full-dose consolidation paclitaxel-carboplatin is recommended when patients receive weekly paclitaxel-carboplatin ChRT. Effective novel chemotherapy agents or targeted therapies are required to further improve the outcome of patients with LA-NSCLC. In addition, personalized medicine concomitant with radiation therapy is a promising approach. However, little evidence exists concerning the effectiveness of this novel approach.

Phase 2 study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin, or pemetrexed plus cisplatin with concurrent radiation therapy followed by pemetrexed consolidation in patients with favorable-prognosis inoperable stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus chemotherapy regimen with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) for inoperable stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer. This trial evaluated pemetrexed with carboplatin (PCb) or cisplatin (PC) with concurrent RT followed by consolidation pemetrexed.

METHODS

In this open-label, noncomparative phase II trial, patients with inoperable stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer (initially all histologies, later restricted to nonsquamous) were randomized (1:1) to PCb or PC with concurrent RT (64-68 Gy over days 1-45). Consolidation pemetrexed monotherapy was administered every 21 days for three cycles. Primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS) rate.

RESULTS

From June 2007 to November 2009, 98 patients were enrolled (PCb: 46; PC: 52). The 2-year OS rate was PCb: 45.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.5-60.0%); PC: 58.4% (95% CI, 42.6-71.3%), and in nonsquamous patients was PCb: 48.0% (95% CI, 29.0-64.8%); PC: 55.8% (95% CI, 38.0-70.3%). Median time to disease progression was PCb: 8.8 months (95% CI, 6.0-12.6 months); PC: 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-not evaluable [NE]). Median OS (months) was PCb: 18.7 (95% CI, 12.9-NE); PC: 27.0 (95% CI, 23.2-NE). The objective response rates (ORRs) were PCb: 52.2%; PC: 46.2%. Grade 4 treatment-related toxicities (% PCb/% PC) were: anemia, 0/1.9; neutropenia, 6.5/3.8; thrombocytopenia, 4.3/1.9; and esophagitis, 0/1.9. Most patients completed scheduled chemotherapy and RT during induction and consolidation phases. No drug-related deaths were reported during chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of study design, efficacy comparisons cannot be made. However, both combinations with concurrent RT were active and well tolerated.

The place of pemetrexed in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Chemotherapy is included in the management of the majority of NSCLC patients either in addition to a local treatment (surgery/radiotherapy) or alone. In this setting, pemetrexed has become one of the most important partners of current chemotherapy regimens for nonsquamous NSCLC patients. Indeed, pemetrexed demonstrated a comparable efficacy to other previously available drugs in NSCLC, with however a better safety profile and an easier schedule of administration. In addition, pemetrexed demonstrated a greater efficacy in nonsquamous NSCLC that lead to an exploration of the underlying potential biological background. It is now suggested that the tumor thymidylate synthase level may act as a predictor of pemetrexed efficacy, therefore potentially providing clinicians in the future with a predictor of efficacy, which it is usually lacking with standard chemotherapies.

First assessment of whole-brain radiation therapy combined with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung carcinoma: data on safety and efficacy

The folate antimetabolite pemetrexed was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Its activity on brain metastases makes pemetrexed attractive in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), but it could also potentially increase toxicity. We examined the medical records of 43 consecutive patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Patients received pemetrexed-based chemotherapy at a dose of 500 mg/m. The median total number of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range: 1-28). During the course of chemotherapy, patients received WBRT delivering 30 Gy in 10 fractions (n=34) or 20 Gy in five fractions (n=9). The median follow-up time was 30.5 weeks (range: 1-79 weeks). Intracranial progression was a cause of death in nine patients (20.9%). Clinical benefit of WBRT was reported in 30 patients (69.8%). The best radiological response was a complete response in eight patients (18.6%), a partial response in 16 patients (37.2%), stable disease in 11 patients (25.6%), and progression in four patients (9.3%). A stable intracranial disease until the last follow-up was observed in 26 patients (60.5%). The median estimated overall survival was 31 weeks (95% CI: 24-37 weeks). Most WBRT-related toxicities were low and 21 patients (48.9%) had no reported acute neurological toxicity. One patient developed unexplained encephalopathy 5 weeks after WBRT completion in the context of progressive diffuse brain metastases. The combination of pemetrexed with WBRT led to considerable clinical improvement and tumor responses in most patients. Overall neurological toxicity was rather low. A clinical trial is essential for better analysis of the potential synergistic effects of a drug with radiation and evaluation of neurological toxicity.

Dose-Escalation Study of Thoracic Radiotherapy in Combination With Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin in Japanese Patients With Locally Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of Survival and Recurrent Sites

OBJECTIVES

We performed a post hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and recurrent sites in patients with locally advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer who were enrolled in a phase I trial of combination chemotherapy consisting of pemetrexed plus cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) plus cisplatin (75 mg/m²) on day 1 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles plus concurrent thoracic radiotherapy consisting of 60 Gy (n=6) or 66 Gy (n=12); 4 to 6 weeks thereafter, patients received consolidation treatment with pemetrexed (500 mg/m) every 3 weeks for up to 3 cycles. We reviewed the medial records to collect data on progression, recurrent sites, late toxicity, and survival.

RESULTS

No late radiation morbidity was observed. Thirteen patients (72%) exhibited disease progression: 8 patients had distant metastases, 8 patients had local recurrence (within the radiation field [n=6], outside the radiation field [n=2], and both [n=1]), and 3 patients had local recurrence plus distant metastases. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8-12.3), and the 3-year PFS rate was 28% (95% CI, 7.0-48.6). Ten of the 18 patients died of lung cancer. The median follow-up time for the censored cases was 42.8 months (range, 38.1 to 52.9 mo). The median OS was 27.3 months (95% CI, 13.1-41.6), and the 3-year OS rate was 50% (95% CI, 26.9-73.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The median PFS and OS in our study were comparable to those of historical chemoradiotherapy controls.

Controversies in the management of stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of death in the USA and is the most common cancer both in incidence and in mortality globally (1.35 million deaths annually). Non-small-cell lung cancer accounts for >80% of all lung cancers [1] . About 35-45% of non-small-cell lung cancer patients present with locally advanced non-metastatic stage III disease. However, confirmed stage III disease represents a very heterogeneous group ranging from borderline surgical candidate with minimal mediastinal involvement to bulky mediastinal nodes or contralateral nodal involvement with significant controversy regarding optimal management in these various situations. This article specifically addresses the role of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy in multimodal approach to treat stage III patients with N2/N3 involvement and controversies surrounding these recommendations.

Expression of thymidylate synthase predicts clinical outcomes of pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Observational and preclinical studies suggested an association between the expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) and clinical effects of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the predictive value of TS for pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy regimen remained controversial. The aim of the study was to further appraise the association between the expression of TS and clinical efficacy pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We searched in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 1945 to May 2013. Two authors independently extracted information from the characteristics of study participants. Primary outcomes included therapeutic response (TR; i.e., complete response + partial response vs. stable disease + progressive disease), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) were used for evaluating the risk or hazard.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Better response usually appeared in NSCLC patients with a lower expression of TS [RR = 2.06 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 1.44, 2.96]. There was a significant association between TS expression and outcomes of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy for NSCLC (PFS: HR = 0.63 95 % CI 0.52, 0.76; OS: HR = 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.63, 0.88). In addition, no evidence of publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis evaluated the predictive value of TS and provided evidence that NSCLC patients with lower TS expression could significantly benefit from pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. This increased level of TS was probably an independent risk factor of potential resistance against pemetrexed.

Association between TYMS expression and efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The predictive value of thymidylate synthase (TYMS) to sensitivity to pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of all relevant published data to assess the association of TYMS expression with the clinical outcomes of pemetrexed-based regimen in advanced NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

We conducted an electronic search using using PubMed, Embase, OVID and Cochrane Library databases and manual search. Pooled odds ratio (OR) for the response rate and hazard ratio (HR) for the overall survival and progression free survival were calculated using the software Revman 5.0.

Results

There were 11 studies (n=798) met our criteria for evaluation. Response rate to pemetrexed-based regimen was significantly higher in patients with low/negative TYMS (OR=2.96, 95%CI [1.81, 4.86] P<0.0001). Patients with low/negative TYMS who were treated with pemetrexed-based regimen had longer progression free survival (HR 0.50, 95%CI [0.41, 0.61] P <0.00001) and overall survival (HR 0.41, 95%CI [0.22, 0.78] P=0.007) than those with high/positive TYMS.

Conclusions

Low/negative TYMS expression was significantly associated with higher response rate, longer median survival and longer progression free survival for advanced NSCLC patients receiving pemtrexed-based chemotherapy. Hence, TYMS may be a potential predictor of sensitivity to pemtrexed-based chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Large scale prospective clinical trials are still warranted.

Association between eIF3α polymorphism and severe toxicity caused by platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients

AIM

Platinum-induced toxicity severely impedes successful chemotherapy in lung cancer patients. The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is considered as one of the major factors contributing to platinum effects. Furthermore, genetic variances of the NER pathway influence platinum toxicity. eIF3α, over expressed in many malignancies, is an up-stream gene of NER and could regulate its activity. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether eIF3α polymorphism is associated with severe platinum toxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Two hundred and eighty-two incident NSCLC patients, from three different institutions, were enrolled and followed up. These patients were diagnosed and histologically confirmed with non-small cell lung cancer. All patients accepted platinum based chemotherapy for at least two cycles. Twenty-two SNPs of eIF3α were detected in these patients.

RESULTS

eIF3α Arg803Lys C > T polymorphism was associated with cisplatin-induced toxicity in NSCLC patients (P = 0.02, OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32, 93). T-carrier subjects presented better tolerance to platinum nephrotoxicity, but poorer tolerance to ototoxicity.

CONCLUSION

eIF3α Arg803Lys was associated with platinum toxicity in NSCLC patients and could be considered as a predictor for pretreatment evaluation in lung cancer patients.

State of the art of radiotherapy

Locally advanced or stage III disease accounts for ~30% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which means only in the United States, more than 50,000 new patients each year. Stage III is a very heterogeneous disease, the management of patients is complex and several conditions (performance status, weight loss, comorbidities, characteristics of nodal involvement or resectability) must be considered before selecting the best treatment, which in most cases is chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT). In this article, we will review key changes in the management of unresectable stage III during the last decades. Also we will highlight some challenges and areas of active research.

ERCC1 and RRM1: ready for prime time?

The quest for markers of sensitivity to cytotoxic agents has been ongoing for decades. In non-small-cell lung cancer, platinum compounds represent the cornerstone of systemic therapy. They target DNA and induce damage that cancer cells struggle to overcome. Somatic excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 1 (ERCC1), and ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) expression levels have been extensively explored as markers of DNA repair capacity in tumor cells. Although low ERCC1 and/or RRM1 expression is generally associated with sensitivity to platinum, the results published in retrospective and prospective studies are not always consistent. Against this background, we will examine in this review the function of these two biomarkers as well as the tools available for their assessment and the associated technical issues. Their prognostic and predictive values will be summarized and considered in terms of customizing systemic therapy according to biomarker (ERCC1 and RRM1) expression levels. We will also discuss why the use of both markers should at this point be restricted to clinical research and underline that functional readouts of DNA repair will help boost future strategies for biomarker discovery in the field.

Emerging developments of chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC

Over the past decade, concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy has become the established treatment for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, many patients with NSCLC are too old or have multiple comorbidities to withstand such aggressive treatments. Attempts to improve outcomes have included studies of radiotherapy dose escalation and new chemotherapy combinations, as well as adding biological agents and cancer vaccines to existing regimens. Technical radiotherapy modifications, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy and particle beam therapy, have also been investigated. Given the number of potential advances to current models of treatment development, phase III trials of any single new treatment can take years to complete, which is inadequate. To advance research within shorter timescales to improve patient outcomes, we need methods of improving clinical trial accrual, which might require changes in models of research governance, cooperative group activity, trial design and patient consent.

Novel approaches of chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage IIIA and stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

Approximately one third of patients with non-small cell lung cancer have unresectable stage IIIA or stage IIIB disease, and appropriate patients are candidates for chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. The optimal treatment paradigm is currently undefined. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, compared with sequential chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), results in superior overall survival outcomes as a result of better locoregional control. Recent trials have revealed efficacy for newer chemotherapy combinations similar to that of older chemotherapy combinations with concurrent TRT and a lower rate of some toxicities. Ongoing phase III trials will determine the roles of cisplatin and pemetrexed concurrent with TRT in patients with nonsquamous histology, cetuximab, and the L-BLP25 vaccine. It is unlikely that bevacizumab will have a role in stage III disease because of its toxicity. Erlotinib, gefitinib, and crizotinib have not been evaluated in stage III patients selected based on molecular characteristics. The preliminary results of a phase III trial that compared conventionally fractionated standard-dose TRT (60 Gy) with high-dose TRT (74 Gy) revealed an inferior survival outcome among patients assigned to the high-dose arm. Hyperfractionation was investigated previously with promising results, but adoption has been limited because of logistical considerations. More recent trials have investigated hypofractionated TRT in chemoradiotherapy. Advances in tumor targeting and radiation treatment planning have made this approach more feasible and reduced the risk for normal tissue toxicity. Adaptive radiotherapy uses changes in tumor volume to adjust the TRT treatment plan during therapy, and trials using this strategy are ongoing. Ongoing trials with proton therapy will provide initial efficacy and safety data.

Interstitial pneumonitis after treatment with pemetrexed: a rare event?

BACKGROUND

Pneumonitis after pemetrexed has been rarely reported in conjunction with radiation therapy.

METHODS

Two cases of pemetrexed-induced pneumonitis in different clinical settings and with unequal outcomes are discussed with a review of the literature.

RESULTS

Two patients with stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer developed interstitial lung disease after chemotherapy with pemetrexed. The first patient was previously treated with thoracic radiotherapy, and radiation pneumonitis was initially suspected. He died shortly after pemetrexed reexposition. The second patient developed pemetrexed-induced interstitial lung disease despite no prior radiotherapy. After discontinuation of pemetrexed and administration of steroids, pneumonitis resolved completely.

CONCLUSION

Interstitial lung disease is a rare but potentially fatal side effect of pemetrexed. It occurs more often after radiotherapy but can also be encountered in the absence of radiotherapy. Reexposition to pemetrexed may lead to severe interstitial lung disease and even death and should be strictly avoided.