Results of a multicentric in silico clinical trial (ROCOCO): comparing radiotherapy with photons and protons for non-small cell lung cancer

Prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative-intent conventional radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important side effect of thoracic Radiotherapy (RT), which may impair quality of life and survival. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for new-onset AF in patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) receiving RT alone or as a part of their multi-modal treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage I-IV NSCLC treated with curative-intent conventional photon RT were included. The baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) was compared with follow-up ECGs to identify the occurrence of new-onset AF. A wide range of potential clinical predictors and dose-volume measures on the whole heart and six automatically contoured cardiac substructures, including chambers and conduction nodes, were considered for statistical modeling. Internal validation with optimism-correction was performed. A nomogram was made.

RESULTS

374 patients (mean age 69 ± 10 years, 57 % male) were included. At baseline, 9.1 % of patients had AF, and 42 (11.2 %) patients developed new-onset AF. The following parameters were predictive: older age (OR=1.04, 95 % CI: 1.013-1.068), being overweight or obese (OR=1.791, 95 % CI: 1.139-2.816), alcohol use (OR=4.052, 95 % CI: 2.445-6.715), history of cardiac procedures (OR=2.329, 95 % CI: 1.287-4.215), tumor located in the upper lobe (OR=2.571, 95 % CI: 1.518-4.355), higher forced expiratory volume in 1 s (OR=0.989, 95 % CI: 0.979-0.999), higher creatinine (OR=1.008, 95 % CI: 1.002-1.014), concurrent chemotherapy (OR=3.266, 95 % CI: 1.757 to 6.07) and left atrium Dmax (OR=1.022, 95 % CI: 1.012-1.032). The model showed good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.76-0.84), calibration and positive net benefits.

CONCLUSION

This prediction model employs readily available predictors to identify patients at high risk of new-onset AF who could potentially benefit from active screening and timely management of post-RT AF.

Impact of interplay effects on spot scanning proton therapy with motion mitigation techniques for lung cancer: SFUD versus robustly optimized IMPT plans utilizing a four-dimensional dynamic dose simulation tool

BACKGROUND

The interaction between breathing motion and scanning beams causes interplay effects in spot-scanning proton therapy for lung cancer, resulting in compromised treatment quality. This study investigated the effects and clinical robustness of two types of spot-scanning proton therapy with motion-mitigation techniques for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a new simulation tool (4DCT-based dose reconstruction).

METHODS

Three-field single-field uniform dose (SFUD) and robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans combined with gating and re-scanning techniques were created using a VQA treatment planning system for 15 patients with locally advanced NSCLC (70 GyRBE/35 fractions). In addition, gating windows of three or five phases around the end-of-expiration phase and two internal gross tumor volumes (iGTVs) were created, and a re-scanning number of four was used. First, the static dose (SD) was calculated using the end-of-expiration computed tomography (CT) images. The four-dimensional dynamic dose (4DDD) was then calculated using the SD plans, 4D-CT images, and the deformable image registration technique on end-of-expiration CT. The target coverage (V98%, V100%), homogeneity index (HI), and conformation number (CN) for the iGTVs and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses were calculated for the SD and 4DDD groups and statistically compared between the SD, 4DDD, SFUD, and IMPT treatment plans using paired t-test.

RESULTS

In the 3- and 5-phase SFUD, statistically significant differences between the SD and 4DDD groups were observed for V100%, HI, and CN. In addition, statistically significant differences were observed for V98%, V100%, and HI in phases 3 and 5 of IMPT. The mean V98% and V100% in both 3-phase plans were within clinical limits (> 95%) when interplay effects were considered; however, V100% decreased to 89.3% and 94.0% for the 5-phase SFUD and IMPT, respectively. Regarding the significant differences in the deterioration rates of the dose volume histogram (DVH) indices, the 3-phase SFUD plans had lower V98% and CN values and higher V100% values than the IMPT plans. In the 5-phase plans, SFUD had higher deterioration rates for V100% and HI than IMPT.

CONCLUSIONS

Interplay effects minimally impacted target coverage and OAR doses in SFUD and robustly optimized IMPT with 3-phase gating and re-scanning for locally advanced NSCLC. However, target coverage significantly declined with an increased gating window. Robustly optimized IMPT showed superior resilience to interplay effects, ensuring better target coverage, prescription dose adherence, and homogeneity than SFUD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

None.

Exploring beamline momentum acceptance for tracking respiratory variability in lung cancer proton therapy: a simulation study

Objective. Investigating the aspects of proton beam delivery to track organ motion with pencil beam scanning therapy. Considering current systems as a reference, specify requirements for next-generation units aiming at real-time image-guided treatments.Approach. Proton treatments for six non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were simulated using repeated 4DCTs to model respiratory motion variability. Energy corrections required for this treatment site were evaluated for different approaches to tumour tracking, focusing on the potential for energy adjustment within beamline momentum acceptance (dp/p). A respiration-synchronised tracking, taking into account realistic machine delivery limits, was compared to ideal tracking scenarios, in which unconstrained energy corrections are possible. Rescanning and the use of multiple fields to mitigate residual interplay effects and dose degradation have also been investigated.Main results. Energy correction requirements increased with motion amplitudes, for all patients and tracking scenarios. Higher dose degradation was found for larger motion amplitudes, rescanning has beneficial effects and helped to improve dosimetry metrics for the investigated limited dp/pof 1.2% (realistic) and 2.4%. The median differences between ideal and respiratory-synchronised tracking show minimal discrepancies, 1% and 5% respectively for dose coverage (CTV V95) and homogeneity (D5-D95). Multiple-field planning improves D5-D95 up to 50% in the most extreme cases while it does not show a significant effect on V95.Significance. This work shows the potential of implementing tumour tracking in current proton therapy units and outlines design requirements for future developments. Energy regulation within momentum acceptance was investigated to tracking tumour motion with respiratory-synchronisation, achieving results in line with the performance of ideal tracking scenarios. ±5% Δp/p would allow to compensate for all range offsets in our NSCLC patient cohort, including breathing variability. However, the realistic momentum of 1.2% dp/prepresentative of existing medical units limitations, has been shown to preserve plan quality.

Cost-effectiveness of proton radiotherapy versus photon radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients: Exploring the model-based approach

INTRODUCTION

Proton radiotherapy (PT) is a promising but more expensive strategy than photon radiotherapy (XRT) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PT is probably not cost-effective for all patients. Therefore, patients can be selected using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models with predefined criteria. This study aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for patients with stage III NSCLC: 1. photon radiotherapy for all patients (XRT_All); 2. PT for all patients (PT_All); 3. PT for selected patients (PT_{Individualized}).

METHODS

A decision-analytical model was constructed to estimate and compare costs and QALYs of all strategies. Three radiation-related toxicities were included: dyspnea, dysphagia and cardiotoxicity. Costs and QALY's were incorporated for grade 2 and ≥ 3 toxicities separately. Incremental Cost-Effectiven Ratios (ICERs) were calculated and compared to a threshold value of €80,000. Additionally, scenario, sensitivity and value of information analyses were performed.

RESULTS

PT_All yielded most QALYs, but was also most expensive. XRT_All was the least effective and least expensive strategy, and the most cost-effective strategy. For thresholds higher than €163,467 per QALY gained, PT_{Individualized} was cost-effective. When assuming equal minutes per fraction (15 minutes) for PT and XRT, PT_{Individualized} was considered the most cost-effective strategy (ICER: €76,299).

CONCLUSION

Currently, PT is not cost-effective for all patients, nor for patient selected on the current NTCP models used in the Dutch indication protocol. However, with improved clinical experience, personnel and treatment costs of PT can decrease over time, which potentially leads to PT_{Individualized}, with optimal patient selection, will becoming a cost-effective strategy.

The impact of organ motion and the appliance of mitigation strategies on the effectiveness of hypoxia-guided proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of organ motion on hypoxia-guided proton therapy treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hypoxia PET and 4D imaging data of six NSCLC patients were used to simulate hypoxia-guided proton therapy with different motion mitigation strategies including rescanning, breath-hold, respiratory gating and tumour tracking. Motion-induced dose degradation was estimated for treatment plans with dose painting of hypoxic tumour sub-volumes at escalated dose levels. Tumour control probability (TCP) and dosimetry indices were assessed to weigh the clinical benefit of dose escalation and motion mitigation. In addition, the difference in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) between escalated proton and photon VMAT treatments has been assessed.

RESULTS

Motion-induced dose degradation was found for target coverage (CTV V_95% up to -4%) and quality of the dose-escalation-by-contour (Q_RMS up to 6%) as a function of motion amplitude and amount of dose escalation. The TCP benefit coming from dose escalation (+4-13%) outweighs the motion-induced losses (<2%). Significant average NTCP reductions of dose-escalated proton plans were found for lungs (-14%), oesophagus (-10%) and heart (-16%) compared to conventional VMAT plans. The best plan dosimetry was obtained with breath hold and respiratory gating with rescanning.

CONCLUSION

NSCLC affected by hypoxia appears to be a prime target for proton therapy which, by dose-escalation, allows to mitigate hypoxia-induced radio-resistance despite the sensitivity to organ motion. Furthermore, substantial reduction in normal tissue toxicity can be expected compared to conventional VMAT. Accessibility and standardization of hypoxia imaging and clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings in a clinical setting.

GOECP/SEOR radiotheraphy guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease accounting for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Only 17% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Treatment is multidisciplinary and radiotherapy plays a key role in all stages of the disease. More than 50% of patients with NSCLC are treated with radiotherapy (curative-intent or palliative). Technological advances-including highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, new immobilization and respiratory control systems, and precision image verification systems-allow clinicians to individualize treatment to maximize tumor control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Novel therapeutic regimens such as moderate hypofractionation and advanced techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have reduced the number of radiotherapy sessions. The integration of SBRT into routine clinical practice has radically altered treatment of early-stage disease. SBRT also plays an increasingly important role in oligometastatic disease. The aim of the present guidelines is to review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of localized, locally-advanced, and metastatic NSCLC. We review the main radiotherapy techniques and clarify the role of radiotherapy in routine clinical practice. These guidelines are based on the best available evidence. The level and grade of evidence supporting each recommendation is provided.

Flourish of Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in China

Proton and heavy ion therapy offer superior relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in the treatment of deep-seated tumors compared with conventional photon radiotherapy due to its Bragg-peak feature of energy deposition in organs. Many proton and carbon ion therapy centers are active all over the world. At present, five particle radiotherapy institutes have been built and are receiving patient in China, mainly including Wanjie Proton Therapy Center (WPTC), Shanghai Proton Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC), Heavy Ion Cancer Treatment Center (HIMM), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH), and Ruijin Hospital affiliated with Jiao Tong University. Many cancer patients have benefited from ion therapy, showing unique advantages over surgery and chemotherapy. By the end of 2020, nearly 8,000 patients had been treated with proton, carbon ion or carbon ion combined with proton therapy. So far, there is no systemic review for proton and carbon ion therapy facility and clinical outcome in China. We reviewed the development of proton and heavy ion therapy, as well as providing the representative clinical data and future directions for particle therapy in China. It has important guiding significance for the design and construction of new particle therapy center and patients’ choice of treatment equipment.

Influence of X-rays and gamma-rays on the mechanical performance of human bone factoring out intraindividual bone structure and composition indices

Doses of irradiation above 25 ​kGy are known to cause irreversible mechanical decay in bone tissue. However, the impact of irradiation doses absorbed in a clinical setting on the mechanical properties of bone remains unclear. In daily clinical practice and research, patients and specimens are exposed to irradiation due to diagnostic imaging tools, with doses ranging from milligray to Gray. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of irradiation at these doses ranges on the mechanical performance of bone independent of inter-individual bone quality indices.

Therefore, cortical bone specimens (n ​= ​10 per group) from a selected organ donor were irradiated at doses of milligray, Gray and kilogray (graft tissue sterilization) at five different irradiation doses. Three-point bending was performed to assess mechanical properties in the study groups.

Our results show a severe reduction in mechanical performance (work to fracture: 50.29 ​± ​11.49 Nmm in control, 14.73 ​± ​1.84 Nmm at 31.2 ​kGy p ​≤ ​0.05) at high irradiation doses of 31.2 ​kGy, which correspond to graft tissue sterilization or synchrotron imaging. In contrast, no reduction in mechanical properties were detected for doses below 30 ​Gy. These findings are further supported by fracture surface texture imaging (i.e. more brittle fracture textures above 31.2 ​kGy).

Our findings show that high radiation doses (≥31.2 ​kGy) severely alter the mechanical properties of bone. Thus, irradiation of this order of magnitude should be taken into account when mechanical analyses are planned after irradiation. However, doses of 30 ​Gy and below, which are common for clinical and experimental imaging (e.g., radiation therapy, DVT imaging, CT imaging, HR-pQCT imaging, DXA measurements, etc.), do not alter the mechanical bending-behavior of bone.

Dosimetry, Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of Proton Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common malignancy which requires radiotherapy (RT) as an important part of its multimodality treatment. With the advent of the novel irradiation technique, the clinical outcome of NSCLC patients who receive RT has been dramatically improved. The emergence of proton therapy, which allows for a sharper dose of build-up and drop-off compared to photon therapy, has potentially improved clinical outcomes of NSCLC. Dosimetry studies have indicated that proton therapy can significantly reduce the doses for normal organs, especially the lung, heart, and esophagus while maintaining similar robust target volume coverage in both early and advanced NSCLC compared with photon therapy. However, to date, most studies have been single-arm and concluded no significant changes in the efficacy for early-stage NSCLC by proton therapy over stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The results of proton therapy for advanced NSCLC in these studies were promising, with improved clinical outcomes and reduced toxicities compared with historical photon therapy data. However, these studies were also mainly single-arm and lacked a direct comparison between the two therapies. Currently, there is much emerging evidence focusing on dosimetry, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of proton therapy for NSCLC that has been published, however, a comprehensive review comparing these therapies is, to date, lacking. Thus, this review focuses on these aspects of proton therapy for NSCLC.

Proton therapy for thoracic malignancies: a review of oncologic outcomes

Introduction: Radiotherapy is an integral component in the treatment of the majority of thoracic malignancies. By taking advantage of the steep dose fall-off characteristic of protons combined with modern optimization and delivery techniques, proton beam therapy (PBT) has emerged as a potential tool to improve oncologic outcomes while reducing toxicities from treatment.Areas covered: We review the physical properties and treatment techniques that form the basis of PBT as applicable for thoracic malignancies, including a brief discussion on the recent advances that show promise to enhance treatment planning and delivery. The dosimetric advantages and clinical outcomes of PBT are critically reviewed for each of the major thoracic malignancies, including lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mesothelioma, thymic cancer, and primary mediastinal lymphoma.Expert opinion: Despite clear dosimetric benefits with PBT in thoracic radiotherapy, the improvement in clinical outcomes remains to be seen. Nevertheless, with the incorporation of newer techniques, PBT remains a promising modality and ongoing randomized studies will clarify its role to determine which patients with thoracic malignancies receive the most benefit. Re-irradiation, advanced disease requiring high cardio-pulmonary irradiation volume and younger patients will likely derive maximum benefit with modern PBT.

Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To use a model-based approach to identify a sub-group of patients with locally advanced lung cancer who would benefit from proton therapy compared to photon therapy for reduction of cardiac toxicity.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) and robust-optimised intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were generated for twenty patients with locally advanced lung cancer to give a dose of 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) in 35 fractions. Cases were selected to represent a range of anatomical locations of disease. Contouring, treatment planning and organs-at-risk constraints followed RTOG-1308 protocol. Whole heart and ub-structure doses were compared. Risk estimates of grade⩾3 cardiac toxicity were calculated based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models which incorporated dose metrics and patients baseline risk-factors (pre-existing heart disease (HD)).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in target coverage between VMAT and IMPT. IMPT delivered lower doses to the heart and cardiac substructures (mean, heart V5 and V30, P < .05). In VMAT plans, there were statistically significant positive correlations between heart dose and the thoracic vertebral level that corresponded to the most inferior limit of the disease. The median level at which the superior aspect of the heart contour began was the T7 vertebrae. There was a statistically significant difference in dose (mean, V5 and V30) to the heart and all substructures (except mean dose to left coronary artery and V30 to sino-atrial node) when disease overlapped with or was inferior to the T7 vertebrae. In the presence of pre-existing HD and disease overlapping with or inferior to the T7 vertebrae, the mean estimated relative risk reduction of grade⩾3 toxicities was 24-59%.

CONCLUSION

IMPT is expected to reduce cardiac toxicity compared to VMAT by reducing dose to the heart and substructures. Patients with both pre-existing heart disease and tumour and nodal spread overlapping with or inferior to the T7 vertebrae are likely to benefit most from proton over photon therapy.

Role of Proton Beam Therapy in Current Day Radiation Oncology Practice

Proton beam therapy (PBT), because of its unique physics of no–exit dose deposition in the tissue, is an exciting prospect. The phenomenon of Bragg peak allows protons to deposit their almost entire energy towards the end of the path of the proton and stops any further dose delivery. Braggs peak equips PBT with superior dosimetric advantage over photons or electrons because PBT doesn’t traverse the target/body but is stopped sharply at an energy dependent depth in the target/body. It also has no exit dose. Because of no exit dose and normal tissue sparing, PBT is hailed for its potential to bring superior outcomes. Pediatric malignancies is the most common malignancy where PBT have found utmost application. Nowadays, PBT is also being used in the treatment of other malignancies such as carcinoma prostate, carcinoma breast, head and neck malignancies, and gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Despite advantages of PBT, there is not only a high cost of setting up of PBT centers but also a lack of definitive phase-III data. Therefore, we review the role of PBT in current day practice of oncology to bring out the nuances that must guide the practice to choose suitable patients for PBT.

Photons or protons for reirradiation in (non-)small cell lung cancer: Results of the multicentric ROCOCO in silico study

OBJECTIVE

Locally recurrent disease is of increasing concern in (non-)small cell lung cancer [(N)SCLC] patients. Local reirradiation with photons or particles may be of benefit to these patients. In this multicentre in silico trial performed within the Radiation Oncology Collaborative Comparison (ROCOCO) consortium, the doses to the target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were compared when using several photon and proton techniques in patients with recurrent localised lung cancer scheduled to undergo reirradiation.

METHODS

24 consecutive patients with a second primary (N)SCLC or recurrent disease after curative-intent, standard fractionated radio(chemo)therapy were included in this study. The target volumes and OARs were centrally contoured and distributed to the participating ROCOCO sites. Remaining doses to the OARs were calculated on an individual patient's basis. Treatment planning was performed by the participating site using the clinical treatment planning system and associated beam characteristics.

RESULTS

Treatment plans for all modalities (five photon and two proton plans per patient) were available for 22 patients (N = 154 plans). 3D-conformal photon therapy and double-scattered proton therapy delivered significantly lower doses to the target volumes. The highly conformal techniques, i.e., intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), CyberKnife, TomoTherapy and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), reached the highest doses in the target volumes. Of these, IMPT was able to statistically significantly decrease the radiation doses to the OARs.

CONCLUSION

Highly conformal photon and proton beam techniques enable high-dose reirradiation of the target volume. They, however, significantly differ in the dose deposited in the OARs. The therapeutic options, i.e., reirradiation or systemic therapy, need to be carefully weighed and discussed with the patients.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Highly conformal photon and proton beam techniques enable high-dose reirradiation of the target volume. In light of the abilities of the various highly conformal techniques to spare specific OARs, the therapeutic options need to be carefully weighed and patients included in the decision-making process.

Organ sparing potential and inter-fraction robustness of adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer

Background: The aim of this study was to compare adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) robustness and organ sparing capabilities with that of adaptive volumetric arc photon therapy (VMAT).Material and methods: Eighteen lung cancer patients underwent a planning 4DCT (p4DCT) and 5 weekly repeated 4DCT (r4DCT) scans. Target volumes and organs at risk were manually delineated on the three-dimensional (3D) average scans of the p4DCT (av_p4DCT) and of the r4DCT scans (av_r4DCT). Planning target volume (PTV)-based VMAT plans and internal clinical target volume (ICTV)-based robust IMPT plans were optimized in 3D on the av_p4DCT and re-calculated on the av_r4DCTs. Re-planning on av_r4DCTs was performed when indicated and accumulated doses were evaluated on the av_p4DCT.Results: Adaptive VMAT and IMPT resulted in adequate ICTV coverage on av_r4DCT in all patients and adequate accumulated-dose ICTV coverage on av_p4DCT in 17/18 patients (due to a shrinking target in one patient). More frequent re-planning was needed for IMPT than for VMAT. The average mean heart dose reduction with IMPT compared with VMAT was 4.6 Gy (p = .001) and it was >5 Gy for five patients (6, 7, 8, 15, and 22 Gy). The average mean lung dose reduction was 3.2 Gy (p < .001). Significant reductions in heart and lung V5 Gy were observed with IMPT.Conclusion: Robust-planned IMPT required re-planning more often than VMAT but resulted in similar accumulated ICTV coverage. With IMPT, heart and lung mean dose values and low dose regions were significantly reduced. Substantial cardiac sparing was obtained in a subgroup of five patients (28%).

Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

PURPOSE

Approximate dose calculation methods were used in the nominal dose distribution and the perturbed dose distributions due to uncertainties in a commercial treatment planning system (CTPS) for robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). We aimed to investigate whether the approximations influence plan quality, robustness, and interplay effect of the resulting IMPT plans for the treatment of locally advanced lung cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten consecutively treated locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were selected. Two IMPT plans were created for each patient using our in-house developed TPS, named "Solo," and also the CTPS, Eclipse^TM (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), respectively. The plans were designed to deliver prescription doses to internal target volumes (ITV) drawn by a physician on averaged four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). Solo plans were imported back to CTPS, and recalculated in CTPS for fair comparison. Both plans were further verified for each patient by recalculating doses in the inhalation and exhalation phases to ensure that all plans met clinical requirements. Plan robustness was quantified on all phases using dose-volume-histograms (DVH) indices in the worst-case scenario. The interplay effect was evaluated for every plan using an in-house developed software, which randomized starting phases of each field per fraction and accumulated dose in the exhalation phase based on the patient's breathing motion pattern and the proton spot delivery in a time-dependent fashion. DVH indices were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

Compared to the plans generated using CTPS on the averaged CT, Solo plans had significantly better target dose coverage and homogeneity (normalized by the prescription dose) in the worst-case scenario [ITV D_95% : 98.04% vs 96.28%, Solo vs CTPS, P = 0.020; ITV D_5% -D_95% : 7.20% vs 9.03%, P = 0.049] while all DVH indices were comparable in the nominal scenario. On the inhalation phase, Solo plans had better target dose coverage and cord D_max in the nominal scenario [ITV D_95% : 99.36% vs 98.45%, Solo vs CTPS, P = 0.014; cord D_max : 20.07 vs 23.71 Gy(RBE), P = 0.027] with better target coverage and cord D_max in the worst-case scenario [ITV D_95% : 97.89% vs 96.47%, Solo vs CTPS, P = 0.037; cord D_max : 24.57 vs 28.14 Gy(RBE), P = 0.037]. On the exhalation phase, similar phenomena were observed in the nominal scenario [ITV D_95% : 99.63% vs 98.87%, Solo vs CTPS, P = 0.037; cord D_max : 19.67 vs 23.66 Gy(RBE), P = 0.039] and in the worst-case scenario [ITV D_95% : 98.20% vs 96.74%, Solo vs CTPS, P = 0.027; cord D_max : 23.47 vs 27.93 Gy(RBE), P = 0.027]. In terms of interplay effect, plans generated by Solo had significantly better target dose coverage and homogeneity, less hot spots, and lower esophageal D_mean , and cord D_max [ITV D_95% : 101.81% vs 98.68%, Solo vs CTPS, P = 0.002; ITV D_5% -D_95% : 2.94% vs 7.51%, P = 0.002; cord D_max : 18.87 vs 22.29 Gy(RBE), P = 0.014].

CONCLUSIONS

Solo-generated IMPT plans provide improved cord sparing, better target robustness in all considered phases, and reduced interplay effect compared with CTPS. Consequently, the approximation methods currently used in commercial TPS programs may have space for improvement in generating optimal IMPT plans for patient cases with locally advanced lung cancer.

Proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: the road ahead

Proton therapy is an evolving radiotherapy modality with indication for numerous cancer types. With the benefits of reducing dose and sparing normal tissue, protons offer a clear physical and dosimetric advantage over photon radiotherapy for many patients. However, its impact on one type of disease, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is still not fully understood. Our review aims to highlight the data for using proton therapy in NSCLC, with a focus on the clinical data-or lack thereof-supporting proton treatment for early and advanced stage disease. In evaluating these data, we consider how future directions and advances in proton technology give rise for hope in defining a role for protons in improving NSCLC outcomes. We close with considerations for next steps and the challenges ahead in using proton therapy for this unique patient population.

Radiation-Induced Lung Injury: Assessment and Management

Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) encompasses any lung toxicity induced by radiation therapy (RT) and manifests acutely as radiation pneumonitis and chronically as radiation pulmonary fibrosis. Because most patients with thoracic and breast malignancies are expected to undergo RT in their lifetime, many with curative intent, the population at risk is significant. Furthermore, indications for thoracic RT are expanding given the advent of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for early-stage lung cancer in nonsurgical candidates as well as oligometastatic pulmonary disease from any solid tumor. Fortunately, the incidence of serious pulmonary complications from RT has decreased secondary to advances in radiation delivery techniques. Understanding the temporal relationship between RT and injury as well as the patient, disease, and radiation factors that help distinguish RILI from other etiologies is necessary to prevent misdiagnosis. Although treatment of acute pneumonitis is dependent on clinical severity and typically responds completely to corticosteroids, accurately diagnosing and identifying patients who may progress to fibrosis is challenging. Current research advances include high-precision radiation techniques, an improved understanding of the molecular basis of RILI, the development of small and large animal models, and the identification of candidate drugs for prevention and treatment.

AAR-RT - A system for auto-contouring organs at risk on CT images for radiation therapy planning: Principles, design, and large-scale evaluation on head-and-neck and thoracic cancer cases

Contouring (segmentation) of Organs at Risk (OARs) in medical images is required for accurate radiation therapy (RT) planning. In current clinical practice, OAR contouring is performed with low levels of automation. Although several approaches have been proposed in the literature for improving automation, it is difficult to gain an understanding of how well these methods would perform in a realistic clinical setting. This is chiefly due to three key factors - small number of patient studies used for evaluation, lack of performance evaluation as a function of input image quality, and lack of precise anatomic definitions of OARs. In this paper, extending our previous body-wide Automatic Anatomy Recognition (AAR) framework to RT planning of OARs in the head and neck (H&N) and thoracic body regions, we present a methodology called AAR-RT to overcome some of these hurdles. AAR-RT follows AAR's 3-stage paradigm of model-building, object-recognition, and object-delineation. Model-building: Three key advances were made over AAR. (i) AAR-RT (like AAR) starts off with a computationally precise definition of the two body regions and all of their OARs. Ground truth delineations of OARs are then generated following these definitions strictly. We retrospectively gathered patient data sets and the associated contour data sets that have been created previously in routine clinical RT planning from our Radiation Oncology department and mended the contours to conform to these definitions. We then derived an Object Quality Score (OQS) for each OAR sample and an Image Quality Score (IQS) for each study, both on a 1-to-10 scale, based on quality grades assigned to each OAR sample following 9 key quality criteria. Only studies with high IQS and high OQS for all of their OARs were selected for model building. IQS and OQS were employed for evaluating AAR-RT's performance as a function of image/object quality. (ii) In place of the previous hand-crafted hierarchy for organizing OARs in AAR, we devised a method to find an optimal hierarchy for each body region. Optimality was based on minimizing object recognition error. (iii) In addition to the parent-to-child relationship encoded in the hierarchy in previous AAR, we developed a directed probability graph technique to further improve recognition accuracy by learning and encoding in the model "steady" relationships that may exist among OAR boundaries in the three orthogonal planes. Object-recognition: The two key improvements over the previous approach are (i) use of the optimal hierarchy for actual recognition of OARs in a given image, and (ii) refined recognition by making use of the trained probability graph. Object-delineation: We use a kNN classifier confined to the fuzzy object mask localized by the recognition step and then fit optimally the fuzzy mask to the kNN-derived voxel cluster to bring back shape constraint on the object. We evaluated AAR-RT on 205 thoracic and 298 H&N (total 503) studies, involving both planning and re-planning scans and a total of 21 organs (9 - thorax, 12 - H&N). The studies were gathered from two patient age groups for each gender - 40-59 years and 60-79 years. The number of 3D OAR samples analyzed from the two body regions was 4301. IQS and OQS tended to cluster at the two ends of the score scale. Accordingly, we considered two quality groups for each gender - good and poor. Good quality data sets typically had OQS ≥ 6 and had distortions, artifacts, pathology etc. in not more than 3 slices through the object. The number of model-worthy data sets used for training were 38 for thorax and 36 for H&N, and the remaining 479 studies were used for testing AAR-RT. Accordingly, we created 4 anatomy models, one each for: Thorax male (20 model-worthy data sets), Thorax female (18 model-worthy data sets), H&N male (20 model-worthy data sets), and H&N female (16 model-worthy data sets). On "good" cases, AAR-RT's recognition accuracy was within 2 voxels and delineation boundary distance was within ∼1 voxel. This was similar to the variability observed between two dosimetrists in manually contouring 5-6 OARs in each of 169 studies. On "poor" cases, AAR-RT's errors hovered around 5 voxels for recognition and 2 voxels for boundary distance. The performance was similar on planning and replanning cases, and there was no gender difference in performance. AAR-RT's recognition operation is much more robust than delineation. Understanding object and image quality and how they influence performance is crucial for devising effective object recognition and delineation algorithms. OQS seems to be more important than IQS in determining accuracy. Streak artifacts arising from dental implants and fillings and beam hardening from bone pose the greatest challenge to auto-contouring methods.

Spatial Dose Patterns Associated With Radiation Pneumonitis in a Randomized Trial Comparing Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy With Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is commonly associated with thoracic radiation therapy, and its incidence is related to dose and volume of the normal lung in the path of radiation. Our aim was to investigate dose patterns associated with RP in patients enrolled in a randomized trial of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed 178 patients prospectively treated with PSPT or IMRT for non-small cell lung cancer to a prescribed dose of 66 or 74 Gy in conventional daily fractionation with concurrent chemotherapy. Forty patients (22%) developed clinically symptomatic RP. Voxel-based analysis of local dose differences was done with a nonparametric permutation test accounting for multiple comparisons. From the obtained 3-dimensional significance maps, we derived clusters of voxels that exhibited dose differences between groups at a statistical significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

The voxel-based analysis highlighted that (1) significant dose differences between patients with and without RP were found in the lower part of the lungs and in the heart and (2) the anatomic regions significantly spared by PSPT and the clusters in which doses were significantly correlated with RP development were disjoint.

CONCLUSIONS

The analyzed trial data provide an unprecedented opportunity to substantiate previous hypotheses regarding the role of the heart and the lower lungs in the development of RP. Knowledge of this relationship between RP and thoracic regional radiosensitivity should be considered in clinical practice and in the design of future trials.

Distinct vascular genomic response of proton and gamma radiation-A pilot investigation

The cardiovascular biology of proton radiotherapy is not well understood. We aimed to compare the genomic dose-response to proton and gamma radiation of the mouse aorta to assess whether their vascular effects may diverge. We performed comparative RNA sequencing of the aorta following (4 hrs) total-body proton and gamma irradiation (0.5–200 cGy whole body dose, 10 dose levels) of conscious mice. A trend analysis identified genes that showed a dose response. While fewer genes were dose-responsive to proton than gamma radiation (29 vs. 194 genes; q-value ≤ 0.1), the magnitude of the effect was greater. Highly responsive genes were enriched for radiation response pathways (DNA damage, apoptosis, cellular stress and inflammation; p-value ≤ 0.01). Gamma, but not proton radiation induced additionally genes in vasculature specific pathways. Genes responsive to both radiation types showed almost perfectly superimposable dose-response relationships. Despite the activation of canonical radiation response pathways by both radiation types, we detected marked differences in the genomic response of the murine aorta. Models of cardiovascular risk based on photon radiation may not accurately predict the risk associated with proton radiation.

Intensity-modulated proton therapy decreases dose to organs at risk in low-grade glioma patients: results of a multicentric in silico ROCOCO trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) have a prolonged survival expectancy due to better discriminative tumor classification and multimodal treatment. Consequently, long-term treatment toxicity gains importance. Contemporary radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), tomotherapy (TOMO) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enable high-dose irradiation of the target but they differ regarding delivered dose to organs at risk (OARs). The aim of this comparative in silico study was to determine these dosimetric differences in delivered doses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Imaging datasets of 25 LGG patients having undergone postoperative radiotherapy were included. For each of these patients, in silico treatment plans to a total dose of 50.4 Gy to the target volume were generated for the four treatment modalities investigated (i.e., IMRT, VMAT, TOMO, IMPT). Resulting treatment plans were analyzed regarding dose to target and surrounding OARs comparing IMRT, TOMO and IMPT to VMAT.

RESULTS

In total, 100 treatment plans (four per patient) were analyzed. Compared to VMAT, the IMPT mean dose (D_mean) for nine out of 10 (90%) OARs was statistically significantly (p < .02) reduced, for TOMO this was true in 3/10 (30%) patients and for 1/10 (10%) patients for IMRT. IMPT was the prime modality reducing dose to the OARs followed by TOMO.

DISCUSSION

The low dose volume to the majority of OARs was significantly reduced when using IMPT compared to VMAT. Whether this will lead to a significant reduction in neurocognitive decline and improved quality of life is to be determined in carefully designed future clinical trials.

Clinical outcomes of image-guided proton therapy for histologically confirmed stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Two prospective phase II trials were designed to assess the efficacy and safety of image-guided proton therapy (IGPT) for either medically inoperable or operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study reports the interim results of these trials.

Methods

Fifty-five patients with histologically confirmed stage I NSCLC (IA in 33 patients and IB in 22 patients; inoperable in 21 patients and operable in 34 patients) who received IGPT between July 2013 and February 2017 were analyzed. The median patient age was 71 years (range: 48–88 years). IGPT with fiducial metallic marker matching was performed for suitable patients, and a respiratory gating method for motion management was used for all treatments. Peripherally located tumors were treated with 66 Gy relative biological effectiveness equivalents (Gy(RBE)) in 10 fractions (n = 49) and centrally located tumors were treated with 72.6 Gy(RBE) in 22 fractions (n = 6). Treatment associated toxicities were evaluated using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (v.4.0).

Results

Median follow-up was 35 months (range: 12–54 months) for survivors. For all patients, the 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 87% (95% confidence interval: 73–94%), 74% (58–85%), and 96% (83–99%), respectively. Fiducial marker matching was used in 39 patients (71%). Grade 2 toxicities observed were radiation pneumonitis in 5 patients (9%), rib fracture in 2 (4%), and chest wall pain in 5 (9%). There were no grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities.

Conclusions

IGPT appears to be effective and well tolerated for all patients with stage I NSCLC.

Trial registration

Lung-001, 13–02-09 (9), registered 11 June 2013 and Lung-002, 13–02-10 (10), registered 11 June 2013.

Advanced radiation techniques for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy

Radiation therapy (RT) represents an integral part of a multimodality treatment plan in the definitive, preoperative and postoperative management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Technological advances in RT have enabled a shift from two-dimensional radiotherapy to more conformal techniques. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), the current minimum technological standard for treating NSCLC, allows for more accurate delineation of tumor burden by using computed tomography-based treatment planning instead of two-dimensional radiographs. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and proton therapy represent advancements over 3DCRT that aim to improve the conformity of RT and provide the possibility for dose escalation to the tumor by minimizing radiation dose to organs at risk. Both techniques likely confer benefits to certain anatomic subgroups of NSCLC requiring RT. This article reviews pertinent studies evaluating the use of IMRT and proton therapy in locally advanced NSCLC, and outlines challenges, indications for use, and areas for future research.

Proton beam therapy and immunotherapy: an emerging partnership for immune activation in non-small cell lung cancer

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is becoming an increasingly common option for patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). With the concurrent emergence of immunotherapy as an effective systemic treatment for historically treatment-resistant disease such as advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the combination of RT's immunoadjuvant effects with immunotherapy is gaining widespread attention. However, pre-clinical and clinical studies have shown potential immunosuppressive mechanisms associated with conventional RT that may restrict its immunogenic potential. Protons, as charged particles, exhibit both dosimetric and biological differences in normal and cancer cells that may be able to not only enhance the immunoadjuvant effects of RT, but also reduce immunosuppressive mechanisms. Here, we review the rationale, preclinical and clinical evidence, and ongoing efforts in combining PBT with immunotherapy in cancer treatment with a focus on NSCLC.

The EPTN consensus-based atlas for CT- and MR-based contouring in neuro-oncology

PURPOSE

To create a digital, online atlas for organs at risk (OAR) delineation in neuro-oncology based on high-quality computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

METHODS

CT and 3 Tesla (3T) MR images (slice thickness 1 mm with intravenous contrast agent) were obtained from the same patient and subsequently fused. In addition, a 7T MR without intravenous contrast agent was obtained from a healthy volunteer. Based on discussion between experienced radiation oncologists, the clinically relevant organs at risk (OARs) to be included in the atlas for neuro-oncology were determined, excluding typical head and neck OARs previously published. The draft atlas was delineated by a senior radiation oncologist, 2 residents in radiation oncology, and a senior neuro-radiologist incorporating relevant available literature. The proposed atlas was then critically reviewed and discussed by European radiation oncologists until consensus was reached.

RESULTS

The online atlas includes one CT-scan at two different window settings and one MR scan (3T) showing the OARs in axial, coronal and sagittal view. This manuscript presents the three-dimensional descriptions of the fifteen consensus OARs for neuro-oncology. Among these is a new OAR relevant for neuro-cognition, the posterior cerebellum (illustrated on 7T MR images).

CONCLUSION

In order to decrease inter- and intra-observer variability in delineating OARs relevant for neuro-oncology and thus derive consistent dosimetric data, we propose this atlas to be used in photon and particle therapy. The atlas is available online at www.cancerdata.org and will be updated whenever required.

Towards a Clinical Decision Support System for External Beam Radiation Oncology Prostate Cancer Patients: Proton vs. Photon Radiotherapy? A Radiobiological Study of Robustness and Stability

We present a methodology which can be utilized to select proton or photon radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Four state-of-the-art competing treatment modalities were compared (by way of an in silico trial) for a cohort of 25 prostate cancer patients, with and without correction strategies for prostate displacements. Metrics measured from clinical image guidance systems were used. Three correction strategies were investigated; no-correction, extended-no-action-limit, and online-correction. Clinical efficacy was estimated via radiobiological models incorporating robustness (how probable a given treatment plan was delivered) and stability (the consistency between the probable best and worst delivered treatments at the 95% confidence limit). The results obtained at the cohort level enabled the determination of a threshold for likely clinical benefit at the individual level. Depending on the imaging system and correction strategy; 24%, 32% and 44% of patients were identified as suitable candidates for proton therapy. For the constraints of this study: Intensity-modulated proton therapy with online-correction was on average the most effective modality. Irrespective of the imaging system, each treatment modality is similar in terms of robustness, with and without the correction strategies. Conversely, there is substantial variation in stability between the treatment modalities, which is greatly reduced by correction strategies. This study provides a ‘proof-of-concept’ methodology to enable the prospective identification of individual patients that will most likely (above a certain threshold) benefit from proton therapy.

Advances in proton therapy in lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States (US) and worldwide. Radiation therapy is a mainstay in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and serves as an excellent alternative for early stage patients who are medically inoperable or who decline surgery. Proton therapy has been shown to offer a significant dosimetric advantage in NSCLC patients over photon therapy, with a decrease in dose to vital organs at risk (OARs) including the heart, lungs and esophagus. This in turn, can lead to a decrease in acute and late toxicities in a population already predisposed to lung and cardiac injury. Here, we present a review on proton treatment techniques, studies, clinical outcomes and toxicities associated with treating both early stage and locally advanced NSCLC.

Decision support systems for personalized and participative radiation oncology

A paradigm shift from current population based medicine to personalized and participative medicine is underway. This transition is being supported by the development of clinical decision support systems based on prediction models of treatment outcome. In radiation oncology, these models 'learn' using advanced and innovative information technologies (ideally in a distributed fashion - please watch the animation: http://youtu.be/ZDJFOxpwqEA) from all available/appropriate medical data (clinical, treatment, imaging, biological/genetic, etc.) to achieve the highest possible accuracy with respect to prediction of tumor response and normal tissue toxicity. In this position paper, we deliver an overview of the factors that are associated with outcome in radiation oncology and discuss the methodology behind the development of accurate prediction models, which is a multi-faceted process. Subsequent to initial development/validation and clinical introduction, decision support systems should be constantly re-evaluated (through quality assurance procedures) in different patient datasets in order to refine and re-optimize the models, ensuring the continuous utility of the models. In the reasonably near future, decision support systems will be fully integrated within the clinic, with data and knowledge being shared in a standardized, dynamic, and potentially global manner enabling truly personalized and participative medicine.

Adaptation is mandatory for intensity modulated proton therapy of advanced lung cancer to ensure target coverage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Large anatomical changes during radiotherapy are seen for a large proportion of lung cancer patients. We investigate the applicability of a decision support protocol for photon therapy in a proton therapy setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive NSCLC patients treated with adaptive photon therapy were retrospectively planned using IMPT. The adaptive protocol was based on geometrical measures of target positioning and large anatomical changes as shown on daily CBCT scans. Two surveillance CT-scans were acquired during the treatment course. The consequences of anatomical changes were evaluated by recalculating the proton plans on the surveillance scans. The CTV receiving 95% of the prescribed dose was analysed.

RESULTS

Fourteen (61%) patients needed adaptations when treated with protons, given that 95% of the CTV must be covered by 95% of the dose. In comparison, no patients needed adaptation when treated with photons using this criterion. The adaptive protocol was found to identify patients with large target under-dosage for proton therapy (six patients). Additionally, target under-dosage was observed for eight patients with non-rigid changes up to 15mm in the positioning of the bones.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton therapy for loco-regional lung cancer demands daily imaging and therapy adaptation for a high proportion of patients.

Optimal design and patient selection for interventional trials using radiogenomic biomarkers: A REQUITE and Radiogenomics consortium statement

The optimal design and patient selection for interventional trials in radiogenomics seem trivial at first sight. However, radiogenomics do not give binary information like in e.g. targetable mutation biomarkers. Here, the risk to develop severe side effects is continuous, with increasing incidences of side effects with higher doses and/or volumes. In addition, a multi-SNP assay will produce a predicted probability of developing side effects and will require one or more cut-off thresholds for classifying risk into discrete categories. A classical biomarker trial design is therefore not optimal, whereas a risk factor stratification approach is more appropriate. Patient selection is crucial and this should be based on the dose-response relations for a specific endpoint. Alternatives to standard treatment should be available and this should take into account the preferences of patients. This will be discussed in detail.

A critical review of recent developments in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality, and radiotherapy plays a key role in both curative and palliative treatments for this disease. Recent advances include stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), which is now established as a curative-intent treatment option for patients with peripheral early-stage NSCLC who are medically inoperable, or at high risk for surgical complications. Improved delivery techniques have facilitated studies evaluating the role of SABR in oligometastatic NSCLC, and encouraged the use of high-technology radiotherapy in some palliative settings. Although outcomes in locally advanced NSCLC remain disappointing for many patients, future progress may come about from an improved understanding of disease biology and the development of radiotherapy approaches that further reduce normal tissue irradiation. At the moment, the benefits, if any, of radiotherapy technologies such as proton beam therapy remain unproven. This paper provides a critical review of selected aspects of modern radiotherapy for lung cancer, highlights the current limitations in our understanding and treatment approaches, and discuss future treatment strategies for NSCLC.

Nuclear physics in particle therapy: a review

Charged particle therapy has been largely driven and influenced by nuclear physics. The increase in energy deposition density along the ion path in the body allows reducing the dose to normal tissues during radiotherapy compared to photons. Clinical results of particle therapy support the physical rationale for this treatment, but the method remains controversial because of the high cost and of the lack of comparative clinical trials proving the benefit compared to x-rays. Research in applied nuclear physics, including nuclear interactions, dosimetry, image guidance, range verification, novel accelerators and beam delivery technologies, can significantly improve the clinical outcome in particle therapy. Measurements of fragmentation cross-sections, including those for the production of positron-emitting fragments, and attenuation curves are needed for tuning Monte Carlo codes, whose use in clinical environments is rapidly increasing thanks to fast calculation methods. Existing cross sections and codes are indeed not very accurate in the energy and target regions of interest for particle therapy. These measurements are especially urgent for new ions to be used in therapy, such as helium. Furthermore, nuclear physics hardware developments are frequently finding applications in ion therapy due to similar requirements concerning sensors and real-time data processing. In this review we will briefly describe the physics bases, and concentrate on the open issues.

An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning

PURPOSE

Planning studies to compare x-ray and proton techniques and to select the most suitable technique for each patient have been hampered by the nonequivalence of several aspects of treatment planning and delivery. A fair comparison should compare similarly advanced delivery techniques from current clinical practice and also assess the robustness of each technique. The present study therefore compared volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and single-field optimization (SFO) spot scanning proton therapy plans created using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for dose escalation in midesophageal cancer and analyzed the effect of setup and range uncertainties on these plans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 21 patients, SIB plans with a physical dose prescription of 2 Gy or 2.5 Gy/fraction in 25 fractions to planning target volume (PTV)50Gy or PTV62.5Gy (primary tumor with 0.5 cm margins) were created and evaluated for robustness to random setup errors and proton range errors. Dose-volume metrics were compared for the optimal and uncertainty plans, with P<.05 (Wilcoxon) considered significant.

RESULTS

SFO reduced the mean lung dose by 51.4% (range 35.1%-76.1%) and the mean heart dose by 40.9% (range 15.0%-57.4%) compared with VMAT. Proton plan robustness to a 3.5% range error was acceptable. For all patients, the clinical target volume D98 was 95.0% to 100.4% of the prescribed dose and gross tumor volume (GTV) D98 was 98.8% to 101%. Setup error robustness was patient anatomy dependent, and the potential minimum dose per fraction was always lower with SFO than with VMAT. The clinical target volume D98 was lower by 0.6% to 7.8% of the prescribed dose, and the GTV D98 was lower by 0.3% to 2.2% of the prescribed GTV dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The SFO plans achieved significant sparing of normal tissue compared with the VMAT plans for midesophageal cancer. The target dose coverage in the SIB proton plans was less robust to random setup errors and might be unacceptable for certain patients. Robust optimization to ensure adequate target coverage of SIB proton plans might be beneficial.

Development and evaluation of an online three-level proton vs photon decision support prototype for head and neck cancer - Comparison of dose, toxicity and cost-effectiveness

To quantitatively assess the effectiveness of proton therapy for individual patients, we developed a prototype for an online platform for proton decision support (PRODECIS) comparing photon and proton treatments on dose metric, toxicity and cost-effectiveness levels. An evaluation was performed with 23 head and neck cancer datasets.

Recent developments in clinical trial designs for HIV vaccine research

HIV vaccine strategies are expected to be a crucial component for controlling the HIV epidemic. Despite the large spectrum of potential candidate vaccines for both prophylactic and therapeutic use, the overall development process of an efficacious HIV vaccine strategy is lengthy. The design of clinical trials and the progression of a candidate strategy through the different clinical development stages remain methodologically challenging, mainly due to the lack of validated correlates of protection. In this review, we describe recent advances in clinical trial designs to increase the efficiency of the clinical development of candidate HIV vaccine strategies. The methodological aspects of the designs for early- (phase I and II) and later -stage (phase IIB and III) development are discussed, taking into account the specificities of both prophylactic and therapeutic HIV vaccine development.

Increasing the Therapeutic Ratio of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy by Individualized Isotoxic Dose Prescription

To obtain a favorable tradeoff between treatment benefits and morbidity ("therapeutic ratio"), radiotherapy (RT) dose is prescribed according to the tumor volume, with the goal of controlling the disease while respecting normal tissue tolerance levels. We propose a new paradigm for tumor dose prescription in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) based on organ-at-risk (OAR) tolerance levels called isotoxic dose prescription (IDP), which is derived from experiences and limitations of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. With IDP, the radiation dose is prescribed based on the predefined level of normal tissue complication probability of a nearby dose-limiting OAR at a prespecified dose-volume constraint. Simultaneously, the prescribed total tumor dose (TTD) is maximized to the technically highest achievable level in order to increase the local tumor control probability (TCP). IDP is especially relevant for tumors located at eloquent locations or for large tumors in which severe toxicity has been described. IDP will result in a lower RT dose or a treatment scheduled with more fractions if the OAR tolerance level is exceeded, and potential dose escalation occurs when the OAR tolerance level allows it and when it is expected to be beneficial (if TCP < 90%). For patients with small tumors at noneloquent sites, the current SABR dose prescription already results in high rates of local control at low toxicity rates. In this review, the concept of IDP is described in the context of SABR.

Modern clinical research: How rapid learning health care and cohort multiple randomised clinical trials complement traditional evidence based medicine

BACKGROUND

Trials are vital in informing routine clinical care; however, current designs have major deficiencies. An overview of the various challenges that face modern clinical research and the methods that can be exploited to solve these challenges, in the context of personalised cancer treatment in the 21st century is provided.

AIM

The purpose of this manuscript, without intending to be comprehensive, is to spark thought whilst presenting and discussing two important and complementary alternatives to traditional evidence-based medicine, specifically rapid learning health care and cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design. Rapid learning health care is an approach that proposes to extract and apply knowledge from routine clinical care data rather than exclusively depending on clinical trial evidence, (please watch the animation: http://youtu.be/ZDJFOxpwqEA). The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design is a pragmatic method which has been proposed to help overcome the weaknesses of conventional randomised trials, taking advantage of the standardised follow-up approaches more and more used in routine patient care. This approach is particularly useful when the new intervention is a priori attractive for the patient (i.e. proton therapy, patient decision aids or expensive medications), when the outcomes are easily collected, and when there is no need of a placebo arm.

DISCUSSION

Truly personalised cancer treatment is the goal in modern radiotherapy. However, personalised cancer treatment is also an immense challenge. The vast variety of both cancer patients and treatment options makes it extremely difficult to determine which decisions are optimal for the individual patient. Nevertheless, rapid learning health care and cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design are two approaches (among others) that can help meet this challenge.

Improved calibration of mass stopping power in low density tissue for a proton pencil beam algorithm

Dose distributions for proton therapy treatments are almost exclusively calculated using pencil beam algorithms. An essential input to these algorithms is the patient model, derived from x-ray computed tomography (CT), which is used to estimate proton stopping power along the pencil beam paths. This study highlights a potential inaccuracy in the mapping between mass density and proton stopping power used by a clinical pencil beam algorithm in materials less dense than water. It proposes an alternative physically-motivated function (the mass average, or MA, formula) for use in this region. Comparisons are made between dose-depth curves calculated by the pencil beam method and those calculated by the Monte Carlo particle transport code MCNPX in a one-dimensional lung model. Proton range differences of up to 3% are observed between the methods, reduced to  <1% when using the MA function. The impact of these range errors on clinical dose distributions is demonstrated using treatment plans for a non-small cell lung cancer patient. The change in stopping power calculation methodology results in relatively minor differences in dose when plans use three fields, but differences are observed at the 2%-2 mm level when a single field uniform dose technique is adopted. It is therefore suggested that the MA formula is adopted by users of the pencil beam algorithm for optimal dose calculation in lung, and that a similar approach is considered when beams traverse other low density regions such as the paranasal sinuses and mastoid process.

Disregarding RBE variation in treatment plan comparison may lead to bias in favor of proton plans

PURPOSE

Currently in proton radiation therapy, a constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) equal to 1.1 is assumed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of disregarding variations in RBE on the comparison of proton and photon treatment plans.

METHODS

Intensity modulated treatment plans using photons and protons were created for three brain tumor cases with the target situated close to organs at risk. The proton plans were optimized assuming a standard RBE equal to 1.1, and the resulting linear energy transfer (LET) distribution for the plans was calculated. In the plan evaluation, the effect of a variable RBE was studied. The RBE model used considers the RBE variation with dose, LET, and the tissue specific parameter α/β of photons. The plan comparison was based on dose distributions, DVHs and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs).

RESULTS

Under the assumption of RBE=1.1, higher doses to the tumor and lower doses to the normal tissues were obtained for the proton plans compared to the photon plans. In contrast, when accounting for RBE variations, the comparison showed lower doses to the tumor and hot spots in organs at risk in the proton plans. These hot spots resulted in higher estimated NTCPs in the proton plans compared to the photon plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Disregarding RBE variations might lead to suboptimal proton plans giving lower effect in the tumor and higher effect in normal tissues than expected. For cases where the target is situated close to structures sensitive to hot spot doses, this trend may lead to bias in favor of proton plans in treatment plan comparisons.

The radiobiology of hypofractionation

If the α/β ratio is high (e.g. 10 Gy) for tumour clonogen killing, but low (e.g. 3 Gy) for late normal tissue complications, then delivering external beam radiotherapy in a large number (20-30) of small (≈2 Gy) dose fractions should yield the highest 'therapeutic ratio'; this is demonstrated via the linear-quadratic model of cell killing. However, this 'conventional wisdom' is increasingly being challenged, partly by the success of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) extreme hypofractionation regimens of three to five large fractions for early stage non-small cell lung cancer and partly by indications that for certain tumours (prostate, breast) the α/β ratio may be of the same order or even lower than that characterising late complications. It is shown how highly conformal dose delivery combined with quasi-parallel normal tissue behaviour (n close to 1) enables 'safe' hypofractionation; this can be predicted by the (α/β)eff concept for normal tissues. Recent analyses of the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy covering 'conventional' hyper- to extreme hypofractionation (stereotactic ablative radiotherapy) regimens are consistent with linear-quadratic radiobiology, even at the largest fraction sizes, despite there being theoretical reasons to expect 'LQ violation' above a certain dose. Impairment of re-oxygenation between fractions and the very high (α/β) for hypoxic cells can complicate the picture regarding the analysis of clinical outcomes; it has also been suggested that vascular damage may play a role for very large dose fractions. Finally, the link between high values of (α/β)eff and normal-tissue sparing for quasi-parallel normal tissues, thereby favouring hypofractionation, may be particularly important for proton therapy, but more generally, improved conformality, achieved by whatever technique, can be translated into individualisation of both prescription dose and fraction number via the 'isotoxic' (iso-normal tissue complication probability) concept.