First-line gefitinib in patients aged 75 or older with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: NEJ 003 study. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:1417-1422. [PMID: 22895139 DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e318260de8b]

QT-Interval Prolongation, Torsades de Pointes, and Heart Failure With EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review

A systematic literature review was conducted to determine the incidence and mortality of QT-interval prolongation (QTp), torsades de pointes (TdP), and heart failure (HF) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKIs. Of 296 identified publications, 95 met eligibility criteria and were abstracted for QTp/TdP and HF outcomes (QTp/TdP: 83 publications, including 5 case study publications; HF: 79 publications, including 6 case study publications [involving 8 patients]). QTp incidence ranged from 0% to 27.8% in observational studies and from 0% to 11% in clinical trials, with no deaths due to QTp. There were no TdP events or deaths due to TdP. The incidence of HF ranged from 0% to 8%, and HF mortality rates ranged from 0% to 4%. Patients receiving treatment with EGFR TKIs should be monitored for signs of QTp, TdP, and HF per prescribing information. Standardized definitions and methods to improve monitoring of QTp, TdP, and HF-related events are needed in patients with NSCLC.

Concomitant osimertinib and antituberculosis therapy in an elderly patient with EGFR-mutated lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis: A case report

The concurrent incidence of lung cancer and tuberculosis is expected to escalate due to the projected growth in the older population. Combination therapy with osimertinib and antituberculosis drugs has not been well-established. We report a case of successful treatment involving the concomitant administration of osimertinib and antituberculosis drugs in an older patient, an 89-year-old female, diagnosed with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis. Accumulating evidence is warranted to develop an optimal treatment strategy for patients with lung cancer and tuberculosis.

Osimertinib as first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting (OSI-FACT-EP)

OBJECTIVES

Osimertinib is the primary treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, evidence of the outcomes of osimertinib treatment in patients over 75 years of age in the real-world setting is limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the data of 538 patients (203 elderly and 335 non-elderly) with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer in whom osimertinib was initiated as first-line treatment between August 2018 and December 2019. Patients over 75 years of age were classified as elderly. The data cut-off date was February 28, 2022.

RESULTS

The progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the elderly and non-elderly groups [elderly group: median PFS, 16.9 months (95 % confidence interval (CI), 14.3-20.2); non-elderly group: median PFS, 22.1 months (95 % CI: 19.5-26.3); hazard ratio (HR) for the elderly against the non-elderly: 1.21 (95 % CI: 0.98-1.50), p = 0.079]. However, the time to treatment failure (TTF) was significantly shorter in the elderly than in the non-elderly [elderly group: median TTF, 14.0 months (95 % CI: 0.98-1.50); non-elderly group: median TTF, 21.8 months (95 % CI: 18.2-24.6); HR for the elderly against the non-elderly: 1.46 (95 % CI: 1.20-1.77), p < 0.001]. Furthermore, the rate of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events was 28.6 % in the elderly and 14.9 % in the non-elderly (p < 0.001). Among patients who discontinued treatment, the conversion rate to second-line treatment was 39.6 % in the elderly and 72.8 % in the non-elderly. In addition, the median overall survival was 30 months (95 % CI: 25.8-37.7) in the elderly and not reached (NR) (95 % CI: NR-NR) in the non-elderly (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world clinical setting, elderly patients receiving osimertinib as first-line treatment should be aware of the frequent inability to transition to second-line treatment due to adverse events.

Expert consensus to optimize the management of older adult patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC) is associated with ageing, with the average age of affected individuals being approximately 70 years. However, despite a higher incidence and prevalence among older people, the older adult population is underrepresented in clinical trials. For LC with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations, there is no clear association of this mutation with age. Geriatric assessments (GAs) and a multidisciplinary approach are essential for defining the optimal treatment. In this consensus, a group of experts selected from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sección de Oncogeriatría de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica-SEOM), the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (Grupo Español de Cáncer de Pulmón-GECP) and the Association for Research on Lung Cancer in Women (Asociación para la Investigación del Cáncer de Pulmón en Mujeres-ICAPEM) evaluate the scientific evidence currently available and propose a series of recommendations to optimize the management of older adult patients with advanced LC with EGFR mutations.

Evaluating the potential of immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients: A real-world study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has become the standard therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, no robust evidence on the efficacy and safety of ICI in elderly NSCLC patients has been established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ICI in elderly NSCLC patients. NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) between 2016 and 2022 were divided into two cohorts according to the age: the Elderly cohort (patients aged ≥ 75 years) and the Nonelderly cohort (patients aged < 75 years). The progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and frequency of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 111 NSCLC patients were included in this study (41 patients in the Elderly cohort and 70 patients in the Nonelderly cohort). The PFS (5.6 months vs. 6.3 months, P = 0.98), response rate (36.6% vs. 44.9%, P = 0.51), and disease control rate (80.5% vs. 76.8%, P = 0.83) were not significantly different between the two cohorts. In a subgroup analysis, stratified according to PD-L1 expression (low vs. high) and ICI treatment mode (ICI monotherapy vs. CIT), the PFSs of both cohorts were also not significantly different, regardless of PD-L1 expression. Moreover, the frequency of irAEs did not significantly differ between elderly and nonelderly NSCLC patients (21/41 [51.2%] vs. 38/70 [54.3%], P = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of ICI in elderly NSCLC patients were not inferior to those in younger patients.

Unraveling the Impact of Intratumoral Heterogeneity on EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a game changer in lung cancer therapy. However, patients often develop resistance to the drugs within a few years. Despite numerous studies that have explored resistance mechanisms, particularly in regards to collateral signal pathway activation, the underlying biology of resistance remains largely unknown. This review focuses on the resistance mechanisms of EGFR-mutated NSCLC from the standpoint of intratumoral heterogeneity, as the biological mechanisms behind resistance are diverse and largely unclear. There exist various subclonal tumor populations in an individual tumor. For lung cancer patients, drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cell populations may have a pivotal role in accelerating the evolution of tumor resistance to treatment through neutral selection. Cancer cells undergo various changes to adapt to the new tumor microenvironment caused by drug exposure. DTP cells may play a crucial role in this adaptation and may be fundamental in mechanisms of resistance. Intratumoral heterogeneity may also be precipitated by DNA gains and losses through chromosomal instability, and the role of extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) may play an important role. Significantly, ecDNA can increase oncogene copy number alterations and enhance intratumoral heterogeneity more effectively than chromosomal instability. Additionally, advances in comprehensive genomic profiling have given us insights into various mutations and concurrent genetic alterations other than EGFR mutations, inducing primary resistance in the context of tumor heterogeneity. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance is clinically crucial since these molecular interlayers in cancer-resistance mechanisms may help to devise novel and individualized anticancer therapeutic approaches.

Older age is not a negative factor for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, retrospective, propensity score-matching study

PURPOSE

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has changed the surgical approach to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) dramatically. The current study compares the outcomes of older and younger patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for NSCLC.

METHODS

In total, 424 eligible patients with pathological stage I NSCLC underwent VATS lobectomy between 2007 and 2017. Patients were classified into two groups (< 75 and ≥ 75 years old), after which propensity score-matching was performed.

RESULTS

After matching, 143 patients were identified. No significant difference in postoperative complication rates was observed; however, the ≥ 75-year-old group had a longer postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.001). The 5-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, and lung cancer-specific survival rates of the < 75- and ≥ 75-year-old groups were 87.1% vs. 85.6% (p = 0.537), 82.1% vs. 79.0% (p = 0.531), and 93.5% vs. 92.7% (p = 0.832), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite the longer postoperative recovery following VATS lobectomy, the short- and long-term outcomes of older patients did not differ from those of younger patients. Thus, for early-stage NSCLC, older age alone was not a negative factor for lobectomy performed via minimally invasive surgery. Naturally, the systemic condition of this population must be evaluated carefully before surgery.

Pharmacokinetics of gefitinib in elderly patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Gefitinib is recommended as a first-line treatment option for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because no pharmacokinetics of gefitinib have been examined, we prospectively assessed the pharmacokinetics of gefitinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene-mutated advanced NSCLC who were 75 years or older.

METHODS

Gefitinib was orally administered once daily at a dose of 250 mg. The concentrations of gefitinib and its major metabolite O-desmethyl gefitinib in plasma were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 48 h (AUC_0-48) was calculated. Polymorphisms in CYP3A5, CYP2D6, ABCG2, ABCB1, and OATP1B1 were analyzed by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with a median age of 80.5 years (range, 75-89) with adequate liver and kidney functions were examined. AUC_0-48 values of gefitinib and O-desmethyl gefitinib in this population were 9.49 ± 3.5 and 10.6 ± 14 µM h, respectively. Compared to the gefitinib pharmacokinetics observed in a previous phase I study in Japan, systemic exposure to gefitinib in elderly patients was slightly higher than that in younger patients. Three patients experienced grade 3 diarrhea, increases in alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase levels 30 days after starting gefitinib treatment. The CYP2D6 genotype was associated with CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of gefitinib to O-desmethyl gefitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated for the first time the systemic exposure to gefitinib in elderly patients with NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry Japan (UMIN000026409) on November 8, 2013.

A Phase II Trial on Osimertinib as a First-Line Treatment for EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC in Elderly Patients: The SPIRAL-0 Study

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is one of the standard first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, because it achieves significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than conventional first-line treatments (hazard ratio: 0.46). However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients aged ≥75 years remain unclear.

METHODS

This phase II study was performed to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was 1-year PFS rate; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The 1-year PFS rate was 59.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1%-72.7%), which did not meet the primary endpoint (the threshold 1-year PFS rate of 50% predicted using data from the NEJ003 study). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were rash/dermatitis acneiform/ALT increased/hypokalemia (2 patients, 5%). Seven patients developed pneumonitis (17.5%). There were no other cases of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events other than pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

Although this study did not meet the primary endpoint, osimertinib was tolerable for elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials [JRCT] ID number: jRCTs071180007).

Advanced Lung Cancer Patients' Use of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Overall Survival: Real-World Evidence from Quebec, Canada

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are breakthrough palliative treatments for advanced lung cancer patients with tumors harboring mutations in the EGFR gene. Using healthcare administrative data, three cohorts were created to describe the use of three EGFR-TKIs that are publicly funded in Quebec for specific indications (i.e., 1st-line gefitinib, 1st-line afatinib, and post-EGFR-TKI osimertinib). The main objective was to compare overall survival (OS) among patients receiving these treatments to those in previous experimental and real-world studies. The patients who received EGFR-TKIs for indications of interest between 1 April 2001, and 31 March 2019 (or 31 March 2020, for post-EGFR-TKI osimertinib) were included to estimate the Kaplan-Meier-based median OS for each cohort. An extensive literature search was conducted to include comparable studies. For the gefitinib 1st-line (n = 457), the afatinib 1st-line (n = 80), and the post-EGFR-TKI osimertinib (n = 119) cohorts, we found a median OS (in months) of 18.9 (95%CI: 16.3-21.9), 26.6 (95%CI: 13.7-NE) and 19.9 (95%CI: 17.4-NE), respectively. Out of the 20 studies that we retained from the literature review and where comparisons were feasible, 17 (85%) had similar OS results, which further confirms the value of these breakthrough therapies in real-world clinical practice.

Retrospective analysis of independent predictors of progression‐free survival in patients with EGFR mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer receiving first‐line osimertinib

Background

Clinically measurable factors affecting the progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients receiving osimertinib as first‐line therapy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not yet been established.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 patients treated with osimertinib as primary therapy for EGFR mutation‐positive advanced NSCLC at Yokohama City University Medical Center between August 2018 and March 2022. Our objective was to identify the independent predictors of PFS.

Results

The median age of participants was 74 years. Overall, 73.8% had good (0–1) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), and 98.4% had histology of adenocarcinoma. The EGFR mutation was exon19 deletion in 52.5% and exon21 L858R in 44.3% of patients. Programmed death‐ligand 1 tumor proportion score >50% was observed in 21.3% and liver metastasis in 9.9% of patients. Median PFS was 19.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6–31.6), and overall survival was not reached. The objective response rate was 68.9%, and disease control rate was 93.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that poor PS (2–4) negatively impacted PFS (hazard ratio, 3.79; 95% CI: 1.46–9.87; p = 0.006). Median PFS in the good PS and poor PS groups was 20.4 months (95% CI: 12.4‐not evaluable) and 7.2 months (95% CI: 7.2–19.5), respectively. Interstitial lung disease of all grades and grade 3 was observed as an adverse event in 6.6 and 4.9% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Poor PS was associated with poor prognosis in patients with EGFR mutation‐positive advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first‐line therapy.

Medical management of older patients with lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death globally. In addition, its incidence increases with age, with approximately half of all cases diagnosed in patients aged ≥70. Molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer have markedly improved outcomes over the past two decades. Despite the high incidence of lung cancer in older people, most trials excluded such patients from enrollment. Therefore, the optimal treatment strategies for older patients remain unclear. The present review summarizes the published literature and provides guidance on the treatment of older patients with lung cancer within three broad stages: (i) early-stage lung cancer, (ii) locally advanced lung cancer and (iii) metastatic lung cancer. We also discuss the use of the latest evidence for older patients.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments based on clinicopathological characteristics for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A growing number of regimens have been approved as first-line treatments for patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer. However, the optimal regimen has not been determined, especially for patients with different clinicopathological characteristics. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC based on clinicopathological characteristics, thereby providing evidence for individual patient clinical decision-making.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, and abstracts of ASCO, ESMO, and WCLC were searched from inception to 3 June 2021 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs) were compared and ranked based on various clinicopathological characteristics among 14 regimens by network meta-analysis (NMA) and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), respectively.

RESULTS

25 RCTs were included, with a total of 6965 patients and 14 treatment regimens. The primary endpoint of all RCTs was PFS, and OS, ORR, and ≥3AEs were secondary endpoints. Regarding overall patients, the most distinct PFS benefit was observed in osimertinib (OSI), with the fewest ≥3AEs, whereas gefitinib plus pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (GEF+PB) provided the greatest benefit for OS. When considering EGFR mutation type, aumolertinib (AUM) and GEF+PB could be the optimal regimens in terms of PFS for patients with EGFR 19DEL and EGFR 21L858R, respectively. Notably, the efficacy of the 14 regimens for PFS varied across clinicopathological characteristics, with GEP+PB ranking first in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS)= 1, Asian, age＜65 and smoking subgroups, with AUM ranking first in ECOG PS= 0 and female subgroups, with ICO+PB ranking first in age ≥65 and no smoking subgroups, and with AFA+CET ranking first in the male subgroup. In terms of brain metastases, third-generation EGFR-TKI showed obvious superiority, with AUM and OSI optimally prolonging PFS in patients with and without brain metastases, respectively. In addition, GEF+PB is a superior alternative, ranking second in terms of PFS regardless of the presence of brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

OSI and GEF+PB were the most two effective first-line regimens for overall patients, ranking first in PFS and OS, respectively. GEF+PB ranked first in terms of PFS in subgroups of EGFR 21L858R, ECOG PS= 1, Asian, age <65, and smoking. Meanwhile, AUM in subgroups of EGFR 19DEL, ECOG PS= 0, female, brain metastasis, OSI in the subgroup of without brain metastasis, ICO+PB in no smoking subgroup, and AFA+CET in male subgroup were the best options as for their evident superiority in PFS.

A randomized phase II study of docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without the continuation of gefitinib after disease progression in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (JMTO LC12-01)

BACKGROUND

Gefitinib (G) is a recommended molecular-targeted agent for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Docetaxel (Doc) and pemetrexed (Pem) have similar efficacies, and either is often used as the sole agent during treatment. The efficacy of continuing G after progressive disease (PD) develops has been reported. It remains unclear whether the continuation of G in combination with a single cytotoxic agent beyond PD is beneficial for elderly patients. Here, we conducted a randomized phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy with G for elderly patients with progressive EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

METHODS

Elderly patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with PD previously treated with G were enrolled. Patients received Pem 500 mg/m or Doc 60 mg/m every 21 days and were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with 250 mg G (G+ Doc/Pem arm) or without G (Doc/Pem arm) until further disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

This trial was terminated early owing to slow accrual. A group of 22 patients underwent analysis. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was significantly longer in the G + Doc/Pem arm (median: 1.6 months vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-0.99, p = 0.0391). Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more frequent in the G + Doc/Pem arm (45.5% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on G and Pem or Doc beyond PD showed a longer PFS than those on single-agent chemotherapy; however, it was associated with increased toxicity.

Biomarker guided treatment in oncogene-driven advanced non-small cell lung cancer in older adults: A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Report

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with most patients diagnosed at an advanced age. The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionized with the introduction of molecular guided therapy. Despites the challenges when considering treatment of older adults, they are still systematically underrepresented in registrational trials. This review aims to summarize the existing evidence on treatment of older patients with lung cancer with a targetable driver mutation or alteration (EGFR, ALK, ROS, BRAF^V600E, MET, RET, KRAS^G12C and NTRK), and consider the evidence from a geriatric oncology perspective. Early generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). TKIs are fairly well-studied in older adults and have been shown to be safe and efficient. However, older adult-specific data regarding the standard-of-care first-line agent osimertinib are lacking. Erlotinib, dacomitinib, and afatinib may be more toxic than other EGFR-TKIs. Next generation ALK-TKIs are preferred over crizotinib due to increased efficacy, as demonstrated in phase III trials. Alectinib seems to be safer than crizotinib, while brigatinib is associated with increased toxicity. Lorlatinib overcomes most resistance mutations, but data regarding this agent have only recently emerged. Regarding ROS1-fusion positive NSCLC, crizotinib is an option in older adults, while entrectinib is similarly effective but shows increased neurotoxicity. In BRAF^V600E-mutant NSCLC, the combination darbafenib/tramectinib is effective, but no safety data for older adults exist. MET alterations can be targeted with capmatinib and tepotinib, and registrational trials included primarily older patients, due to the association of this alteration with advanced age. For RET-rearranged-NSCLC selpercatinib and pralsetinib are approved, and no differences in safety or efficacy between older and younger patients were shown. KRAS^G12C mutations, which are more frequent in older adults, became recently druggable with sotorasib, and advanced age does not seem to affect safety or efficacy. In NTRK-fusion positive tumors, larotrectinib and entrectinib have tumor agnostic approval, however, not enough data on older patients are available. Based on currently available data, molecularly-guided therapy for most alterations is safe and efficacious in older adults with oncogene-driven advanced NSCLC. However, for many TKIs, older adult-specific data are lacking, and should be subject of future prospective evaluations.

Targeted Therapy for Older Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Guidelines from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG) and the French-Language Society of Pulmonology (SPLF)/French-Language Oncology Group (GOLF)

Simple Summary

Targeted therapy has become essential in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are currently no guidelines for older patients who are frailer with regard to this type of treatment. Two learned societies, the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG) and the French-language Society of Pulmonology (SPLF)/French-language Oncology Group (GOLF), joined forces to conduct a systematic review of the literature from May 2010 to May 2021 regarding the efficacy, toxicity, and feasibility of targeted therapy in older patients with NSCLC. Guidelines were then drawn up to enable clinicians to adapt the type of targeted therapy proposed according to the oncological and geriatric profile of the older patient with NSCLC.

Abstract

Systematic molecular profiling and targeted therapy (TKI) have changed the face of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, there are no specific recommendations to address the prescription of TKI for older patients. A multidisciplinary task force from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG) and the French Society of Pulmonology/Oncology Group (SPLF/GOLF) conducted a systematic review from May 2010 to May 2021. Protocol registered in Prospero under number CRD42021224103. Three key questions were selected for older patients with NSCLC: (1) to whom TKI can be proposed, (2) for whom monotherapy should be favored, and (3) to whom a combination of TKI can be proposed. Among the 534 references isolated, 52 were included for the guidelines. The expert panel analysis concluded: (1) osimertinib 80 mg/day is recommended as a first-line treatment for older patients with the EGFR mutation; (2) full-dose first generation TKI, such as erlotinib or gefitinib, is feasible; (3) ALK and ROS1 rearrangement studies including older patients were too scarce to conclude on any definitive recommendations; and (4) given the actual data, TKI should be prescribed as monotherapy. Malnutrition, functional decline, and the number of comorbidities should be assessed primarily before TKI initiation.

Fluorescence Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with a low (<21%) 5-year survival rate. Lung cancer is often driven by the misfunction of molecules on the surface of cells of the epithelium, which orchestrate mechanisms by which these cells grow and proliferate. Beyond common non-specific treatments, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, among molecular-specific treatments, a number of small-molecule drugs that block cancer-driven molecular activity have been developed. These drugs initially have significant success in a subset of patients, but these patients systematically develop resistance within approximately one year of therapy. Substantial efforts towards understanding the mechanisms of resistance have focused on the genomics of cancer progression, the response of cells to the drugs, and the cellular changes that allow resistance to develop. Fluorescence microscopy of many flavours has significantly contributed to the last two areas, and is the subject of this review.

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a complex disease often driven by activating mutations or amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, which expresses a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase. Targeted anti-EGFR treatments include small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), among which gefitinib and erlotinib are the best studied, and their function more often imaged. TKIs block EGFR activation, inducing apoptosis in cancer cells addicted to EGFR signals. It is not understood why TKIs do not work in tumours driven by EGFR overexpression but do so in tumours bearing classical activating EGFR mutations, although the latter develop resistance in about one year. Fluorescence imaging played a crucial part in research efforts to understand pro-survival mechanisms, including the dysregulation of autophagy and endocytosis, by which cells overcome the intendedly lethal TKI-induced EGFR signalling block. At their core, pro-survival mechanisms are facilitated by TKI-induced changes in the function and conformation of EGFR and its interactors. This review brings together some of the main advances from fluorescence imaging in investigating TKI function and places them in the broader context of the TKI resistance field, highlighting some paradoxes and suggesting some areas where super-resolution and other emerging methods could make a further contribution.

Biomarker Testing in Older Patients Treated for an Advanced or Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The French ESME Real-Life Multicenter Cohort Experience

Simple Summary

Genomic and immunologic tumor biomarker testing has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients treated for advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). In older patients, targeted therapy and immunotherapy appear attractive considering better tolerance and increased survival. However, it remains unclear whether they have access to biomarker testing techniques in the same proportion as younger patients. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the proportion of biomarker testing performed in non-squamous aNSCLC at diagnosis between patients aged ≥70 years old and their younger counterparts. There was no significant difference between the two age groups in terms of frequency of biomarker testing. Among old patients tested, 22% of them presented an EGFR mutation. Biomarker testing is a crucial diagnostic tool for older patients with aNSCLC in whom the newer anti-EGFR agents have shown clear benefits.

Abstract

Background: Genomic and immunologic tumor biomarker testing has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients, particularly those treated for advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) when access to targeted agents is available. It remains unclear whether older patients have access to therapy-predictive biomarker testing techniques in the same proportion as younger patients. This study aims to compare the proportion of biomarker testing performed in non-squamous aNSCLC at diagnosis between patients aged ≥70 years old and their younger counterparts. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) Advanced or Metastatic Lung Cancer Data Platform, a French multicenter real-life database. All patients with non-squamous aNSCLC diagnosed between 2015 and 2018 were selected. Biomarker testing corresponded to at least one molecular alteration and/or PD-L1 testing performed within 1 month before or 3 months after the aNSCLC diagnosis. Results: In total, 2848 patients aged ≥70 years and 6900 patients aged <70 years were included. Most patients were male. The proportion of current smokers at diagnosis was higher in the <70 years group (42% vs. 17%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the proportion of biomarker testing performed between the two groups (63% vs. 65%, p = 0.15). EGFR mutations were significantly more common in the older group (22% vs. 12%, p < 0.0001) and KRAS mutations significantly more frequent in the younger group (39% vs. 31% p < 0.0001). The distribution of other driver mutations (ALK, ROS1, BRAF V600E, HER2, and MET) was similar across age. In the multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with biomarker testing were gender, smoking status, history of COPD, stage at primary diagnosis, and histological type. Conclusions: Age is not a barrier to biomarker testing in patients with aNSCLC.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic analysis of low-dose afatinib treatment in elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

An increasing number of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases are being reported in the ageing population. However, studies on the use of afatinib in elderly patients are scarce. We conducted a prospective multicentre, single-arm, and open-label phase II trial for low-dose afatinib (30 mg/day) use in elderly patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutation to assess quality-of-life (QOL) and pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacogenomic (PGx) parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary end-point was the objective response rate (ORR), and the planned number of registered cases was 35, with a threshold ORR of 50%, an expected ORR of 75%, α of 0.05, and β of 0.1. Secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs), QOL survey (FACT-L), and trough plasma concentration of afatinib at steady state (Css) and at the occurrence of clinically significant AEs.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 79 years. The ORR was 80.0% and the disease control rate was 91.4%. The median PFS and OS were 15.6 and 29.5 months, respectively. Four patients discontinued because of AEs. Treatment-related death was not observed. No significant change in QOL was observed at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Css was comparable with those in previous reports and was significantly higher in patients with grade 3 AEs. Direct correlations between afatinib treatment and PGx profiles were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

An afatinib starting dose of 30 mg/day could be an effective and safe treatment option for elderly patients.

A Prospective Observational Study of Osimertinib for Chemo-Naive Elderly Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

The clinical outcomes of elderly patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with osimertinib have not been sufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in elderly chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.

Patients and Methods

We assessed the clinical effects of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for elderly NSCLC patients (≥75 years of age) with an exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation in EGFR. All patients were administered 80 mg/day osimertinib as initial treatment.

Results

Forty-three patients (24 women and 19 men) with adenocarcinoma who were treated between August 2018 and July 2021 were included in this study; their median age was 79 years (range, 75-90 years). The overall objective response rate was 60.5%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) of the entire patient population were 22.1 months and 14.6 months, respectively. The most common adverse event was rash acneiform (42%), followed by diarrhea (33%) and paronychia (28%); none of these were grades ≥3. Interstitial lung disease developed in 8 patients (18.6%); however, no treatment-related deaths occurred. Multivariate analysis identified performance status and disease stage as predictors of PFS and TTF.

Conclusion

Considering the findings of this study and despite an observed discordance between PFS and TTF, osimertinib appears to be an effective and safe treatment option in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. To obtain conclusive results, further studies in a larger elderly population are warranted.

First-line osimertinib in elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicenter study (HOT2002)

Osimertinib is a standard of care therapy for previously untreated epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. However, limited data exist regarding the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as a first-line therapy for elderly patients aged 75 years or older. To assess the potential clinical benefits of osimertinib in this population, this retrospective multi-institutional observational study included 132 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (age ≥ 75 years), who received osimertinib as first-line treatment. The proportion of patients with 1-year progression-free survival was 65.8% (95% confidence interval 57.1–73.5). The median progression-free survival was 19.4 (95% confidence interval 15.9–23.9) months. The median overall survival was not reached (95% confidence interval 24.6–not reached). The frequency of pneumonitis was 17.4%, with a grade 3 or higher rate of 9.1%. More than two-thirds of treatment discontinuations due to pneumonitis occurred within 3 months of starting osimertinib, and the prognosis of patients with pneumonitis was unsatisfactory. Osimertinib is one of the effective first-line therapeutic options for patients aged 75 years or older; however, special caution should be exercised due to the potential development of pneumonitis.

Efficacy and Prognosis of First-Line EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment in Older Adults Including Poor Performance Status Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard first-line treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in older patients including poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) is seldom investigated.

Methods

We enrolled patients 65 years or older with EGFR-mutated Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and evaluated the efficacy and prognosis of first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Clinical and demographic characteristics were reviewed and analyzed, including age, sex, PS, smoking history, EGFR mutation type, treatment regimen, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

From January 2015 to December 2019, a total of 237 patients were included, 205 of whom were eligible for efficacy and outcome analyses. Among them, 91 (44.4%) were categorized as poor PS (2-4). Compared with patients categorized as good PS (0-1), those with poor PS were older (79 versus 75 years), had a higher proportion of brain metastases (41.8% versus 25.4%), more comorbidities (74.7% versus 54.4%), and more likely to be treated with first-generation TKIs (74.7% versus 57.0%). The PFS and OS were 17.1 and 26.7 months respectively in patients with good PS and 12.7 and 18.2 months in those with poor PS (both p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, good PS, <3 metastatic sites, and first-line treatment with afatinib compared with erlotinib and gefitinib were associated with longer PFS. A relatively younger age, good PS, < 3 metastatic sites, and no brain metastasis at diagnosis were associated with better OS.

Conclusion

In older patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and receive EGFR-TKI treatment, a good PS and <3 metastatic sites at diagnosis were associated with a longer PFS and OS. In addition, afatinib as first-line treatment was associated with a longer PFS whereas a relatively younger age and no brain metastasis at diagnosis were associated with better OS.

Effectiveness and Safety of EGFR-TKI Rechallenge Treatment in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Drug-Sensitive EGFR Mutations

Background and Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective first-line chemotherapeutic agents for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. However, the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment is not sufficient in elderly patients (over 75 years of age) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Materials and Methods: Between April 2008 and December 2015, we analyzed 78 elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations with first-line EGFR-TKI treatment at four Japanese institutions. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety profiles of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R mutation). Results: Twenty-two patients in the cohort were rechallenged with EGFR-TKI. The median age was 79.5 years (range 75–87 years). Despite the fact that it was a retrospective analysis, even with EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment the response rate was 23%, progression-free survival was 5.3 months, and overall survival was 14.4 months. Common adverse events included rash acneiform, paronychia, diarrhea, and anorexia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Due to the occurrence of adverse events of grade 2 or more, dose reduction was performed in 15 (68.2%) of 22 cases. Conclusions: EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations was one of the limited, safe and effective treatment options for elderly EGFR-positive lung cancer patients.

Liquid biopsy uncovers distinct patterns of DNA methylation and copy number changes in NSCLC patients with different EGFR-TKI resistant mutations

Targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) provides survival benefits to a majority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance to TKI almost always develops after treatment. Although genetic and epigenetic alterations have each been shown to drive resistance to TKI in cell line models, clinical evidence for their contribution in the acquisition of resistance remains limited. Here, we employed liquid biopsy for simultaneous analysis of genetic and epigenetic changes in 122 Vietnamese NSCLC patients undergoing TKI therapy and displaying acquired resistance. We detected multiple profiles of resistance mutations in 51 patients (41.8%). Of those, genetic alterations in EGFR, particularly EGFR amplification (n = 6), showed pronounced genome instability and genome-wide hypomethylation. Interestingly, the level of hypomethylation was associated with the duration of response to TKI treatment. We also detected hypermethylation in regulatory regions of Homeobox genes which are known to be involved in tumor differentiation. In contrast, such changes were not observed in cases with MET (n = 4) and HER2 (n = 4) amplification. Thus, our study showed that liquid biopsy could provide important insights into the heterogeneity of TKI resistance mechanisms in NSCLC patients, providing essential information for prediction of resistance and selection of subsequent treatment.

Efficacy of erlotinib and its effects on the quality of life of older patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective, multicenter, dose-modification study

Aim

Gefitinib and erlotinib are efficacious and safe for older patients with epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer. However, prolonged use of epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors in older patients is difficult, owing to potential adverse events. Hence, dose reduction or treatment discontinuation is often required. We investigated the efficacy of low‐dose first‐line erlotinib and its effects on the quality of life of older patients with lung cancer.

Methods

A prospective, multicenter, phase II clinical trial was carried out in patients aged ≥75 years with epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer. Initially, 100 mg/day erlotinib was administered orally; if well tolerated, it was increased to 150 mg/day. The primary end‐point was progression‐free survival, and secondary end‐points were the response rate, overall survival and change in quality of life (“Care Notebook” questionnaire).

Results

The median progression‐free survival was 17.8 months, response rate was 63.6% and median overall survival was 27.8 months. The change in the quality of life after 6 weeks was assessed in 72.7% of the patients. Fatigue, pain, anxiety and deterioration in daily activities were found in at least 40% of the patients. Despite the therapeutic effect of 100 mg/day erlotinib, many patients required dose reduction, and in some, the quality of life could not be maintained.

Conclusions

Many older patients with epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer might require treatment dose reduction. Further studies are required to develop individualized treatments for older patients with lung cancer. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 881–886.

First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment of elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents still a challenge for higher risk of comorbidity, deteriorations in physical, organ, and cognitive functions, a potentially different pharmacokinetics, diminished social support, and immunosenescense. Here, we aim to report and analyse the most relevant and recent literature defining the role of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past years, treatment of NSCLC was based on cytotoxic chemotherapy, but recently, new drugs are deeply changing therapeutic standards, such as targeted therapy for oncogene addicted NSCLC, and immunotherapy. Despite lung cancer is primarily a disease of the elderly, they are under-represented in clinical trials. Targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors are largely considered to be appropriated for elderly too, because of their manageability, and fewer side effects compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, we need further investigations to define and to choose the better treatment option for each elderly patient.

Mediastinal lymph node dissection for the elderly with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the differences in prognosis and perioperative complications between patients with and without mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) among elderly patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We analysed 439 patients ≥ 75 years of age with NSCLC classified as clinical stage I who underwent complete resection with lobectomy. We divided the patients into two groups. Those with MLND were included in the MLND group (n = 365), and those without MLND or adequate systematic mediastinal lymph node sampling were included in the non-MLND group (n = 74). To reduce selection bias, a propensity score matching method (3:1) was implemented. We compared survival and the incidence of perioperative complications.

RESULTS

After matching, we compared 171 patients in the MLND group to 57 patients in the non-MLND group. There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the groups. The non-MLND group did not show a significantly better prognosis than the MLND group in overall survival and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.246 and 0.150, respectively). The cumulative incidence of recurrence was similar in the two groups. MLND did not affect chest drain duration or hospitalization. The numbers of patients with perioperative complications ≥ grade 2 or ≥ grade 3 did not differ between the groups (p = 0.312 and > 0.999, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical pulmonary resection without MLND might be a treatment option for elderly patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. Further investigation is needed to clarify the value of MLND, especially for vulnerable elderly individuals.

Survival analysis for older patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer after progression of first-line gefitinib

AIM

Currently, little studies focus on treatment strategies and survival after progression of gefitinib in older patients with epidermal growth factor receptor )EGFR( mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different treatment modalities on survival after progression of gefitinib in older patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis included 62 consecutively recruited EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients aged over 70 years who failed first-line gefitinib between 2008 and 2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate curves for overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis identified independent prognostic risk factors of OS.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 75 years (range, 70-88 years). The median progression-free survival of gefitinib was 11.0 months. Forty-four (69.4%) patients continued gefitinib beyond progressive disease (PD), and median gefitinib treatment duration was 18.0 months. Only 67.7% patients received anticancer treatments after discontinuation of gefitinib. The median OS was 24.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.7-29.3 months). After failure of gefitinib, the osimertinib only group had significantly improved OS compared with chemotherapy or palliative care only groups (37.5 versus 17.5 and 15.3 months, respectively; P = .017). Multivariate analysis showed that continuous gefitinib after Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor-defined PD (hazards ratio [HR] 0.273, 95% CI: 0.132-0.564, P < .001), osimertinib treatment (HR 0.244, 95% CI: 0.122-0.487, P < .001), and better performance status (HR 0.360, 95% CI: 0.163-0.796, P = .012) were significantly and independently correlated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

For older patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the most important treatment. Survival benefit of chemotherapy after failure of gefitinib seems limited.

A phase II study of first-line afatinib for patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: North East Japan Study Group trial NEJ027

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is most common among older individuals. However, polypharmacy and comorbidities, which are also more common in older individuals, can limit treatment options. Previous studies suggest that afatinib can be used safely and effectively in elderly patients. This study investigated the anti-tumour activity and safety profile of first-line afatinib in previously-untreated elderly Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label, phase II study, performed in multiple centres in Japan. Previously untreated patients, aged ≥75 years, with EGFR mutation-positive (Del19 or L858R) advanced NSCLC were treated with afatinib 40 mg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were managed with protocol-defined dose adjustments. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central review.

RESULTS

In total, 38 patients received at least one dose of afatinib, and 37 were evaluable for response. Median age was 77.5 years (range 75-91), all patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and 60.5% had Del19-positive disease. Median follow-up was 838 days. ORR was 75.7% (2 complete responses and 26 partial responses). Median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5-19.0). Median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 months (95% CI, 35.2-not reached); the 2-year OS rate was 78.3%. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were diarrhoea (28.9%), paronychia (23.7%), and rash/acne (15.8%). Dose reductions due to TRAEs were reported in 78.9% of patients, and eight (21.1%) patients discontinued afatinib due to TRAEs. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

Although dose adjustments were relatively common in this small group of Japanese patients aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, discontinuation occurred much less frequently, and most patients were able to stay on treatment for well over a year. Further, afatinib was associated with high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCT) as trial number 031180136 (date of initial registration: 19 February 2019), and the University Hospital Network (UMIN) as trial number 000017877 (date of initial registration: 11 June 2015).

Prognostic factors in older patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Over 40% Japanese patients with lung cancer are above 75 years of age. A specific strategy to treat such older patients is necessary because most trials exclude older patients with poor physical health. Herein, we aimed to identify predictive factors associated with overall survival (OS) in older patients by evaluating patient backgrounds and laboratory data before the start of treatment.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective medical chart review study was conducted at three Japanese institutions and involved patients aged 75 years and above with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Of the patients, 75 had received best supportive care (BSC) and 49 mono-chemotherapy or platinum-doublet chemotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). OS after diagnosis was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional hazard models, which included age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), staging, serum albumin levels, and receipt of chemotherapy were analyzed.

Results

Age at diagnosis was not shown to be related to OS in patients receiving BSC. In patients aged 81 years and above, the chemotherapy group tended to have longer survival than did the BSC group, but there was no statistically significant difference in the median OS between the two groups due to the very small number of subjects (n: 30 vs. 12, median: 52 vs. 30 weeks, hazard ratio: 0.512, 95% confidence interval: 0.232–1.130, P=0.088). The patients’ performance status and albumin levels at lung cancer diagnosis had the highest impact on OS in the BSC group.

Conclusions

Careful consideration should be given to the indications of chemotherapy for patients aged 81 years and above with wild-type EGFR advanced non-small lung cancer.

Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guidelines for Stage IV NSCLC With EGFR Mutations

Patients with NSCLC in East Asia, including Japan, frequently contain EGFR mutations. In 2018, we published the latest full clinical practice guidelines on the basis of those provided by the Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guidelines Committee. The purpose of this study was to update those recommendations, especially for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent EGFR-mutated NSCLC. We conducted a literature search of systematic reviews of randomized controlled and nonrandomized trials published between 2018 and 2019 that multiple physicians had reviewed independently. On the basis of those studies and the advice from the Japanese Society of Lung Cancer Expert Panel, we developed updated guidelines according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. We also evaluated the benefits of overall and progression-free survival, end points, toxicities, and patients' reported outcomes. For patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations, the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs), especially osimertinib, had the best recommendation as to first-line treatment. We also recommended the combination of EGFR TKI with other agents (platinum-based chemotherapy or antiangiogenic agents); however, it can lead to toxicity. In the presence of EGFR uncommon mutations, except for an exon 20 insertion, we also recommended the EGFR TKI treatment. However, we could not provide recommendations for the treatment of EGFR mutations with immune checkpoint inhibitors, including monotherapy, and its combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, because of the limited evidence present in the literature. The 2020 Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guidelines can help community-based physicians to determine the most appropriate treatments and adequately provide medical care to their patients.

Challenges associated with systemic therapy for older patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed worldwide. Data from several studies fall short to make appropriate conclusions on the management for elderly patients. The discovery of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has allowed these patients access to a wider array of options.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review research for treating older patients with lung cancer focusing on research performed in this patient population. Data are presented relating to chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy in the advanced setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Elderly patients particularly benefit from advances in systemic therapy. Based on the tumor profile, treatment with targeted therapy or immunotherapy should be favored over chemotherapy where possible in the elderly population. Elderly patients benefit from EGFR, ALK, and ROS-1 inhibition in the setting of these tumor alterations. These agents should be utilized early in the treatment course. Across many studies, the benefit from immunotherapy is seen irrespective of age. Favorable outcomes and toxicity profiles from immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy are well described. Chemotherapy should be offered with caution after a detailed assessment. Options include combination or single-agent chemotherapy regimens. Best supportive care alone is a reasonable option in the frailer, highly co-morbid patient.

Overall survival of super-elderly (85 years or older) advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with active epidermal growth factor receptor mutations receiving first-line gefitinib therapy: a single-institute retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of first-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy in super-elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring active EGFR mutations remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the difference in the overall survival (OS) among super-elderly (aged ≥ 85 years) NSCLC patients who had received best supportive care alone (BSC group, n = 36), cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT group, n = 11) or EGFR-TKI therapy (TKI group, n = 22).

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 88 years. Among the 35 super-elderly NSCLC patients with an performance status (PS) score of 0-2, 11of 18 EGFR wild-type patients received cytotoxic chemotherapy and 15 of 17 EGFR-mutant patients received EGFR-TKI therapy with gefitinib (n = 13) or osimertinib (n = 2). The OS tended to be longer in the TKI group than in the CT or BSC group (16.9 months vs. 7.2 months or 9.8 months, p = 0.059). Among the 34 super-elderly NSCLC patients with a PS score of 3-4, 7 with EGFR-mutant received gefitinib therapy and the remaining 27 received BSC alone. The OS tended to be longer in the TKI group than in the BSC group (4.6 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.060). Multivariate analysis identified a good PS before the start of first-line therapy and presence of active EGFR mutations reduced a risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Gefitinib appears to be useful as a salvage therapy in super-elderly NSCLC patients with active EGFR mutation, regardless of their PS.

Fatal toxic effects related to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on 53 cohorts with 9,569 participants

Background

To estimate the incidence and susceptible factors of fatal toxic effects related to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

Methods

PubMed and Embase were thoroughly searched for clinical trials based on the following terms and corresponding Medical Subject Heading ones: “erlotinib”, “gefitinib”, “afatinib”, “dacomitinib”, “osimertinib”, and “non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)”. A total of 53 eligible cohorts with 9,569 participants were collected.

Results

A total of 105 cases of fatal toxic effects related to EGFR-TKIs occurred in 53 cohorts. The overall incidence was 1.33% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08–1.63%]. The odds and incidence were apparently higher in Japanese group (compared with non-East Asian group) [2.72 vs. 1.30, P=0.015; odds ratio (OR): 2.26, 95% CI: 1.17–4.37, P=0.015], in first-line treatment group (compared with EGFR-TKI retreatment group) (1.54 vs. 0.69, P=0.028; OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.10–5.26, P=0.028), and in the trial phase II (compared with trial phase III) (1.82% vs. 1.11%, P=0.009; OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.15–2.62, P=0.009). Notably, the Japanese group was higher than non-East Asian group after controlling for the treatment-line and trial phase (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.12–4.16, P=0.022). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was predominant in 29 fatal causes followed by pneumonia, respiratory failure and diarrhea.

Conclusions

The overall incidence of fatal toxic effects related to EGFR-TKIs was 1.33%, and the major fatal cause was ILD, followed by pneumonia, respiratory failure and diarrhea. The susceptible factor of fatal toxic effects related to EGFR-TKIs was the Japanese group. This study provided a capability for clinicians to predict and detect high-risk populations of fatal toxic effects.

Low-Dose Erlotinib Treatment in Elderly or Frail Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Phase 2 Trial

Importance

Although the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR gene mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer is well established, optimal dosing remains to be established, especially in elderly or frail patients.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose erlotinib in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Single-arm phase 2 trial with the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 2-stage design that enrolled frail patients from 21 Japanese institutions after meeting the inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy-naive patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who were considered frail based on age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were eligible for the study.

Interventions

Patients were initially administered 50 mg/d erlotinib for 4 weeks, which was modified based on response or adverse events. Dose increase was permitted for patients with stable disease after 4 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the independent review committee-confirmed objective response rate (ORR) at the dose of 50 mg/d. The study also evaluated the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and influence of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms.

Results

Eighty patients were enrolled, with a median (range) age of 80 (49-90) years; 54 (68%) were men. An independent review committee confirmed a significant ORR of 60.0% (90% CI, 50.2%-69.2%). The disease control rate was 90.0% (90% CI, 82.7%-94.9%), median progression-free survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.2-11.4 months), and median overall survival was 26.2 months (95% CI, 21.9-30.4 months). Mild adverse events were observed in some participants, with few patients exhibiting grade 3 or greater adverse events. Low-dose erlotinib treatment was temporarily suspended for 10 patients owing to adverse events. Five of 80 patients (6%) had their erlotinib dose reduced to 25 mg because of oral mucositis, paronychia, erythema multiforme, diarrhea, and anorexia. Two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (cutaneous ulcer and bone infection, and oral mucositis, respectively). There were no cases of interstitial lung disease or treatment-related deaths. The median (range) erlotinib plasma concentration was measured at 685 (153-1950) ng/mL. Seventy-three patients discontinued study treatment owing to disease progression (n = 60), death (n = 3), AEs (n = 4), and patient requests (n = 6). No clear association was observed between the pharmacokinetics of low-dose erlotinib and the treatment outcome.

Conclusions and Relevance

Low-dose erlotinib appears to be safe and effective in elderly or frail patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer and can be a valid treatment option.

Trial Registration

UMIN-CTR Identifier: UMIN000015949.

ABCG2 C421A polymorphisms affect exposure of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib

ATP-binding castle protein G2 (ABCG2) is thought to inhibit the activities of certain gefitinib transporters, thereby affecting drug pharmacokinetics. The C421A polymorphism affects the function and expression of ABCG2 on the cell membrane. Previous studies have shown that proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) inhibit gefitinib absorption, as well as the function of ABCG2. We evaluated the plasma concentrations of gefitinib in patients with and without the ABCG2 C421A polymorphism, who were or were not taking PPIs. In total, 61 patients with advanced epidermal-growth-factor-positive non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in this study. They were treated with gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg per day. Plasma gefitinib concentration and ABCG2 C421A status were determined after 2 weeks. The patients were divided into CC- and CA/AA genotype groups. We compared the trough and peak gefitinib levels and the area under the curve (AUC) values for 24-h gefitinib concentrations. We also compared these parameters among four groups distinguished according to the presence or absence of the polymorphism and PPI use. The mean trough gefitinib level and AUC value for 24-h gefitinib concentration were significantly lower in the CA/AA group compared to the CC group (mean trough level: 333.2 vs. 454.5 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.021; AUC: 9949.9 vs. 13,085.4 ng・h/mL, respectively, P = 0.034). Among patients taking PPIs, the mean trough gefitinib level was significantly lower in the CA/AA group than the CC group (220.1 vs. 340.5 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.033). The CA/AA-type of ABCG2 C421A polymorphism may be associated with lower gefitinib plasma concentrations.

A phase I and extension study of S-1 and carboplatin for previously untreated patients aged 75 years or more with advanced non-small cell lung cancer -TCOG 1101

PURPOSE

Combination carboplatin and S-1 is active in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on this combination for elderly patients with NSCLC are insufficient.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria were no prior chemotherapy, Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, performance status 0-1, age ≥ 75 years, and adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal functions. Carboplatin was administered on day 1 and S-1 was administered orally, twice a day, between days 1 and 14, repeated every 3 weeks. In phase I, the primary purpose was determination of the recommended dose. Starting doses of carboplatin and S-1 were area under the curve (AUC) of 4 and 80 mg/m²/day, respectively. In the extension study, the effects and tolerability of this combination therapy of recommended dose were confirmed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients were entered into phase I and 14 patients were entered into the extension study. The recommended doses for this drug combination are AUC 5 for carboplatin and 80 mg/m²/day every 3 weeks for S-1. With carboplatin and S-1 combination therapy at the recommended dose, the response rate was 30.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-54%] and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI 68-99%). Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were major adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended doses for this combination therapy are carboplatin AUC 5 and S-1 80 mg/m²/day every 3 weeks, and this combination is effective with tolerable toxicities for advanced NSCLC patients ≥ 75 years old.

Rationale and design of a phase II trial of osimertinib as first-line treatment for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (SPIRAL-0 study)

Background

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has a potent inhibitory effect against both T790M resistance mutations and EGFR-TKI sensitizing in EGFR, with a relatively low affinity for wild-type EGFR. Osimertinib has been approved as a therapeutic agent for patients with T790M-mutation positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. As a first-line treatment, osimertinib may significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison with the earlier generation first-line standard treatment. Osimertinib has been reported to provide survival benefits to EGFR mutation-positive patients. However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients aged ≥75 years remains to be established.

Methods

In this single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial, 40 subjects aged ≥75 years with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer will be recruited. Patients will be treated with osimertinib 80 mg/day until disease progresses or until the patient meets a discontinuation criterion. The primary endpoint is 1-year PFS. Secondary endpoints are overall response rate, PFS, overall survival, and safety. Thirty-seven patients are required for the present study, as calculated based on normal approximation with a one-sided α level of 5% and 80% power, assuming that the expected 1-year PFS is 70% and the 1-year PFS threshold is 50%.

Discussion

We are conducting an intervention study to investigate the safety and efficacy of osimertinib as a first-line treatment agent for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in patients aged ≥75 years.

Trial registration number

jRCTs071180007.

The Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guideline for non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV

According to rapid development of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the Japan Lung Cancer Society has been updated its own guideline annually since 2010. In this latest version, all of the procedure was carried out in accordance with grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system. It includes comprehensive literature search, systematic review, and determination of the recommendation by multidisciplinary expert panel which consisted of medical doctors, pharmacists, nurses, statisticians, and patients from patient advocacy group. Recently, we have had various types of chemotherapeutic drugs like kinase inhibitors or immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, the guideline proposes to categorize patients into three entities: (1) driver oncogene-positive, (2) PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and (3) others. Based on this subgroup, 31 clinical questions were described. We believe that this attempt enables clinicians to choose appropriate treatment easier. Here, we report an English version of the Japan Lung Cancer Society Guidelines 2018 for NSCLC, stages IV.

The clinical features of older patients with lung cancer in comparison with their younger counterparts

BACKGROUND

Older patients with lung cancer have increased over the past decades. Several standard treatments for older patients were established, but their clinical features in real world clinics remain unknown. Thus, we performed a retrospective study to clarify the clinical features of them.

METHODS

The patients with lung cancer who were admitted to our hospital between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients older than 75 years were defined as older patients. Standard treatments were based on the guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 333 patients were analyzed. The older patients had a poor performance status (PS), more comorbidities, and fewer opportunities to receive standard treatments. The prognosis of the older patients who received standard treatments was superior to that of those who did not. The therapeutic efficacy of standard treatments for older patients with stages I and II diseases was similar to their younger counterparts. However, the prognosis of older patients with advanced stage, especially stage III disease, was poor. The tolerability of first-line chemotherapy by older patients was comparable with their younger counterparts, but the older patients had fewer opportunities to receive several chemotherapy regimens, even second line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We should positively consider standard treatments for older patients. However, not only their shorter life expectancy but also their poor PS and multiple comorbidities that sometimes render patients unable to receive standard treatments and several chemotherapy regimens, make their prognosis poor. The standard treatments for older patients, especially in locally advanced stages, require modification.

A phase II study of afatinib treatment for elderly patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of afatinib in elderly patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been evaluated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib in elderly chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively assessed the clinical effects of afatinib as a first-line treatment for elderly (age ≥70 years) NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation). All patients were initially administered afatinib (30 mg/day).

RESULTS

Between May 2014 and August 2017, 40 patients (13 men, 27 women) with adenocarcinoma were included in our analysis. The median age was 77 years (range, 70-85 years). The dose was reduced in 19 patients. The objective overall response and disease control rates were 72.5% and 100%, respectively, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.9 months and not reached, respectively. Common adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea, rash/acne, and anemia. Major grade 3 or higher toxicities included diarrhea (12.5%), mucositis (7.5%), and pneumonitis (7.5%). Afatinib treatment was discontinued in 8 patients owing to AEs of elevated amylase (n = 1), liver dysfunction (n = 1), rash/acne (n = 1), nail change (n = 1), anorexia (n = 2), pneumonitis (n = 2), and diarrhea (n = 2). Two patients died due to treatment-related pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that verified the efficacy and feasibility of first-line chemotherapy with afatinib at 30 mg/day in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. First-line afatinib of 30 mg/day could be a treatment option in this patient population.

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is predominantly a disease that affects the elderly; about 30-40% of lung cancers are diagnosed in patients aged 70 or more. The increasing number of elderly patients over the next decades is generating a new social and health problem; despite that, these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and undertreated in clinical practice. Areas covered: The main difficulty in treating elderly patients is to maximize the therapy benefits while minimizing the treatment risk. Elderly patients show a vulnerable clinical profile due to the higher prevalence of comorbid disease, higher polypharmacy interactions and aged organ dysfunction that increase the risk of mortality and toxicity with cancer treatments compared to younger patients. Expert commentary: The choice to treat or not to treat elderly patients cannot be taken only on the basis of the chronological age. Thus, the clinical approach should be to select patients who are effectively suitable for treatment having a better individual functional reserve and a better life expectancy. Elderly patients are a heterogeneous population and those who are fit to receive cancer treatment can be treated similarly to younger patients.

Pneumonitis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor: Meta-analysis of 153 cohorts with 15,713 patients: Meta-analysis of incidence and risk factors of EGFR-TKI pneumonitis in NSCLC

PURPOSE

Pneumonitis is a significant toxicity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We studied the incidence of pneumonitis in clinical trials of EGFR-TKI published in 2003-2017, and performed subgroups analyses to identity predisposing factors.

METHODS

Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE search up to 4/17/17 using the keywords, "erlotinib", "gefitinib", "afatinib", "osimertinib", and "lung cancer", resulted in a total of 153 eligible trial cohorts with 15,713 advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKI. The pooled incidence of all-grade, high-grade, and grade 5 pneumonitis was obtained. Subgroup analyses were performed with meta-regression using study-level covariates.

RESULTS

Among the patients without prior exposure to EGFR-TKI, the overall incidence was 1.12% (95% CI:0.79-1.58%) for all-grade, 0.61% (95% CI:0.40-0.93%) for high-grade, and 0.20% (95% CI:0.11-0.38%) for grade 5 pneumonitis. The incidence was significantly higher in Japanese studies compared to studies of non-Japan origin, for all-grade (4.77% vs. 0.55%, p < 0.001), high grade (2.49% vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001), and grade 5 pneumonitis (1.00% vs. 0.18%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated higher odds of pneumonitis in Japanese studies for all-grade (odds ratio [OR]: 5.04; 95% CI:3.14-8.11, p < 0.001), high-grade (OR: 4.45; 95% CI:2.50-7.93, p < 0.001), and grade 5 pneumonitis (OR: 4.55; 95% CI:2.20-9.44, p < 0.001) compared to others, after adjusting for types of EGFR-TKI and lines of therapy. In patients with EGFR retreatment analyzed separately, the pooled incidence was 1.13% (95% CI:0.40-3.15%) for all-grade, 0.49% (95% CI:0.21-1.11%) for high-grade, and 0.16% (95% CI:0.04-0.65%) for grade 5 pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of EGFR-TKI pneumonitis was 1.12% in patients without prior exposure to EGFR-TKI, and 1.13% in EGFR-TKI retreatment group. The cohorts from Japan had significantly higher incidence of pneumonitis, providing insights for further mechanistic studies.

Opioid Dose and Survival of Patients with Incurable Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies show that opioids promote angiogenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis, resulting in shorter survival.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether opioids are associated with the overall survival (OS) of patients with incurable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of patients with NSCLC.

SETTING

We investigated patients newly diagnosed with advanced or post-operative recurrent NSCLC between April 2013 and December 2015 at a single institute.

MEASUREMENTS

We evaluated OS, opioid requirements, opioid doses, pain levels, and prognostic factors of advanced NSCLC. The effects of variables on survival were analyzed using univariable and multivariable models. Patients were stratified according to oral morphine equivalents (OMEs)/day (<60 or ≥60 mg) to assess the association between opioid dose and OS.

RESULTS

We analyzed 150 patients, including 64 who received opioid treatment during follow-up. The median OS was 242 days in the opioid group and 627 days in the no-opioid group (log-rank p < 0.001). Multivariable models revealed that the opioid requirement was an independent predictor of shorter OS, after adjustment for prognostic variables, including sex, histology, stage, history of systemic chemotherapy, and performance status (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.137-2.631). There was no significant difference in OS between patients who received ≥60 mg OME/day for 250 days versus <60 OME/day for 242 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The opioid dose does not shorten the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. The opioid requirement is associated with shorter survival when opioids are administered any time during the clinical course, independent of the influence of other key factors.