1
|
Antony MB, Kozel Z, Gopal N, Loebach L, Metwalli AR, Gurram S, Linehan WM, Ball MW. Cumulative Impact of Serial Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Recurrent Renal Masses. J Urol 2024; 212:431-440. [PMID: 38865696 PMCID: PMC11309881 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reoperative partial nephrectomy (RePN) offers several advantages for the treatment of recurrent, multifocal renal masses. RePN has been previously demonstrated to be technically feasible and delay the need for renal replacement therapy. However, there is still inherent complexity and known risks to reoperative nephrectomy. We studied the largest population of RePNs to characterize renal functional outcomes and the likelihood of intra- and postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Query of an institutional surgical registry was conducted. Demographic data, serum creatinine for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and protein dipstick results were assessed within 1 week prior to surgery, and postoperative function assessments were studied within a year of surgery. RePN was defined as serial surgical resection of the ipsilateral renal unit. RESULTS A total of 1131 partial nephrectomies performed on 663 patients at a single center were retrospectively evaluated. In reoperative cases, median number of operations per renal unit was 2 (range: 2-6). There was a stepwise decline in eGFR with an average decline of 6.1 with each RePN. With each subsequent nephrectomy, surgical duration, estimated blood loss, and incidence of preoperative anemia increased. Postoperative eGFR showed a significant positive association with preoperative eGFR, while negative associations were found with age, number of previous ipsilateral partial nephrectomies, number of tumors, and largest tumor size. High-grade complications were associated with the number of ipsilateral partial nephrectomies, tumor count, and tumor size. Robotic or laparoscopic procedures exhibited a likelihood of grade 3 or greater complications compared to open surgery. CONCLUSIONS RePN contributes to renal dysfunction and an increased risk of surgical complications. Intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration increase with subsequent nephrectomy. Such risks are dependent on the number of prior operative interventions on the kidney, suggesting a stepwise progression of surgical morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria B. Antony
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA
| | - Zach Kozel
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA
| | - Nikhil Gopal
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA
| | - Lauren Loebach
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA
| | - Adam R. Metwalli
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA
| | - Sandeep Gurram
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA
| | - W. Marston Linehan
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA
| | - Mark W. Ball
- Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma W, Xu W, Meng J, Chen L, Tai S, Yang C, Chen J, Shi H, Liang C. Reoperation for ipsilateral local recurrence following prior nephron-sparing surgery: innovative surgical insights from a high-volume urological center with cross-sectional study. Int J Surg 2024; 111:01279778-990000000-01757. [PMID: 38954665 PMCID: PMC11745716 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main aim of this study was to examine the perioperative results of reoperations and suggest novel surgical approaches. Based on a substantial number of robotic and laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), we aim to propose novel surgical strategies that offer practical recommendations to surgeons. METHODS Renal cell carcinoma patients with ipsilateral recurrent tumors, without evidence of metastasis, and who underwent primary NSS at our center between 2013 and 2023 were enrolled in this study, and all received the second time surgery. We conducted an analysis to evaluate perioperative outcomes and observed trends over a decade. Additionally, based on the findings from this study, we developed our surgical strategies. RESULTS In the past decade, our center has successfully conducted a total of 2546 surgeries for renal cell carcinoma, out of which this study includes 15 patients who met the specified criteria. For reoperation, robotic-assisted surgery was applied in 5 cases (33.3%), laparoscopic surgery in 6 cases (40%), and open surgeries in 4 cases (26.7%). While 4 (26.7%) patients underwent NSS while radical nephrectomy was performed on 11 patients (73.3%). The median operative time was 215 minutes (IQR: 135-300), and the median estimated blood loss was 50 ml (IQR: 50-100). The median length of postoperative hospitalization was 6 days (IQR: 5-9). Furthermore, there has been a yearly increase in the application of robotic-assisted NSS at our institution. CONCLUSION Reoperation following the pNSS is a secure and effective surgical approach. We introduce novel surgical strategies for primary surgery and reoperation, which offer valuable insights to surgeons in current study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenming Ma
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
| | - Wenlong Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
| | - Jialin Meng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
| | - Sheng Tai
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
| | - Cheng Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
- Center for Big Data and Population Health of IHM, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jinhu Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
| | - Haoqiang Shi
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
| | - Chaozhao Liang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
- Institute of Urology, Anhui Medical University
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Urological and Andrological Diseases Research and Medical Transformation
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shi X, Yu Y, Ye T, Yu G, Xu B, Zhang Z, Wang S, Liu Z, Chen K, Wang S, Li H. Initial Experience with Hybrid Partial Nephrectomy with Ultrasound-guided Balloon Catheter Occlusion of the Renal Artery for Recurrent Renal Tumors. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 60:47-53. [PMID: 38333046 PMCID: PMC10850398 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Repeat partial nephrectomy (PN) is an effective treatment in improving the prognosis for patients with recurrent renal cancer after initial PN. However, salvage PN (sPN) is inevitably associated with a higher rate of complications, largely because of intraperitoneal adhesions and fibrosis. Here we describe three initial cases for which recurrent renal tumors were treated with a novel minimally invasive approach, namely Ultrasound-guided Renal Artery Balloon catheter Occluded Hybrid Partial Nephrectomy (UBo-HPN).With laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) guiding a Fogarty catheter to occlude the arterial blood supply, dissection of the renal hilum and most of the abdominal cavity can be avoided. UBo-HPN was successfully performed in three patients. One case of postoperative fever (Clavien-Dindo grade II) occurred, with no other complications. The mean operative time was 106 min, with a mean warm ischemia time of 21 min. UBo-HPN may be considered a safe and effective alternative for sPN, with a minimally invasive surgical footprint and better surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Shi
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tianrun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Gan Yu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang, China
| | - Zongbiao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Shen Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Ke Chen
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Shaogang Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Institute of Urology of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Antony MB, Anari PY, Gopal N, Chaurasia A, Firouzabadi FD, Homayounieh F, Kozel Z, Gautam R, Gurram S, Linehan WM, Turkbey EB, Malayeri AA, Ball MW. Preoperative Renal Parenchyma Volume as a Predictor of Kidney Function Following Nephrectomy of Complex Renal Masses. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 57:66-73. [PMID: 38020527 PMCID: PMC10658405 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is a hereditary cancer syndrome with multifocal, bilateral cysts and solid tumors of the kidney. Surgical management may include multiple extirpative surgeries, which ultimately results in parenchymal volume loss and subsequent renal function decline. Recent studies have utilized parenchyma volume as an estimate of renal function prior to surgery for renal cell carcinoma; however, it is not yet validated for surgically altered kidneys with multifocal masses and complex cysts such as are present in VHL. Objective We sought to validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based volumetric analysis with mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) renogram and postoperative renal function. Design setting and participants We identified patients undergoing renal surgery at the National Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2020 with preoperative MRI. Renal tumors, cysts, and parenchyma of the operated kidney were segmented manually using ITK-SNAP software. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Serum creatinine and urinalysis were assessed preoperatively, and at 3- and 12-mo follow-up time points. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using serum creatinine-based CKD-EPI 2021 equation. A statistical analysis was conducted on R Studio version 4.1.1. Results and limitations Preoperative MRI scans of 113 VHL patients (56% male, median age 48 yr) were evaluated between 2015 and 2021. Twelve (10.6%) patients had a solitary kidney at the time of surgery; 59 (52%) patients had at least one previous partial nephrectomy on the renal unit. Patients had a median of three (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-5) tumors and five (IQR: 0-13) cysts per kidney on imaging. The median preoperative GFR was 70 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR: 58-89). Preoperative split renal function derived from MAG-3 studies and MRI split renal volume were significantly correlated (r = 0.848, p < 0.001). On the multivariable analysis, total preoperative parenchymal volume, solitary kidney, and preoperative eGFR were significant independent predictors of 12-mo eGFR. When only considering patients with two kidneys undergoing partial nephrectomy, preoperative parenchymal volume and eGFR remained significant predictors of 12-mo eGFR. Conclusions A parenchyma volume analysis on preoperative MRI correlates well with renogram split function and can predict long-term renal function with added benefit of anatomic detail and ease of application. Patient summary Prior to kidney surgery, it is important to understand the contribution of each kidney to overall kidney function. Nuclear medicine scans are currently used to measure split kidney function. We demonstrated that kidney volumes on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can also be used to estimate split kidney function before surgery, while also providing essential details of tumor and kidney anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria B. Antony
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pouria Y. Anari
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nikhil Gopal
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Aditi Chaurasia
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Fatemeh Homayounieh
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Zach Kozel
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rabindra Gautam
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sandeep Gurram
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - W. Marston Linehan
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Evrim B. Turkbey
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ashkan A. Malayeri
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark W. Ball
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pandolfo SD, Cerrato C, Wu Z, Franco A, Del Giudice F, Sciarra A, Verze P, Lucarelli G, Imbimbo C, Perdonà S, Cherullo EE, Porpiglia F, Derweesh IH, Autorino R. A systematic review of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes for advanced indications: Large tumors (cT2-T3), solitary kidney, completely endophytic, hilar, recurrent, and multiple renal tumors. Asian J Urol 2023; 10:390-406. [PMID: 38024426 PMCID: PMC10659988 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become widely used for treatment of renal cell carcinoma and it is expanding in the field of complex renal masses. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze outcomes of RAPN for completely endophytic renal masses, large tumors (cT2-T3), renal cell carcinoma in solitary kidney, recurrent tumors, completely endophytic and hilar masses, and simultaneous and multiple tumors. Methods A comprehensive search in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was performed in December 2022 for English language papers. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the role of RAPN in the setting of each category of complex renal masses considered. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes. Results After screening 1250 records, 43 full-text manuscripts were selected, comprising over 8500 patients. Twelve and thirteen studies reported data for endophytic and hilar renal masses, respectively. Five and three studies reported outcomes for cT2-T3 and solitary kidney patients, respectively. Four studies focused on redo-RAPN for recurrent tumors. Two studies investigated simultaneous bilateral renal masses and five reports focused on multiple tumor excision in ipsilateral kidney. Conclusion Over the past decade, evidence supporting the use of RAPN for the most challenging nephron-sparing surgery indications has continuously grown. Although limitations remain including study design and lack of detailed long-term functional and oncological outcomes, the adoption of RAPN for the included advanced indications is associated with favorable surgical outcomes with good preservation of renal function without compromising the oncological result. Certainly, a higher likelihood of complication might be expected when facing extremely challenging cases. However, none of these indications should be considered per se an exclusion criterion for performing RAPN. Ultimately, a risk-adapted approach should be employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urologic Sciences, La Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urologic Sciences, La Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department Uro-Gynecology, IRCCS G. Pascale Foundation, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Ithaar H. Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang J, Su R, Zhang C, Bao Y, Hu X, Ye X, Chen M, Wang P, Wu J, Wang Y, Tang Q, Huang Z, Zheng B, Li C, Guo J, Huang Y, Wei Q, He Z, Xue W. Comparative analysis of salvage partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy after the failure of initial partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:434.e17-434.e25. [PMID: 37563078 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the oncologic outcomes and renal function discrepancy of salvage partial nephrectomy (sPN) and salvage radical nephrectomy (sRN) after an initial failed PN. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective data from multiple centers between 2008 and 2022 were analyzed in this study. Patients who received sPN or sRN after an initial failed PN were identified. Comparative analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed and the RENAL score, tumor size, and pathological T stage at salvage surgery were used to match the 2 groups. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank tests. Renal function after salvage surgery was assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS A total of 140 patients who underwent salvage surgery were evaluated, of whom 60 were considered for PSM analysis after matching. At a median follow-up of 27.0 months, LRFS and RFS showed no significant difference between sPN and sRN, either before (LRFS, HR = 0.673 [95% CI: 0.171-2.644], P = 0.610; RFS, HR = 0.744 [95% CI: 0.271-1.344], P = 0.595) or after matching (LRFS, HR = 1.080 [95% CI: 0.067-17.30], P = 0.957; RFS, HR = 1.199 [95% CI: 0.241-5.983], P = 0.822). During long-term follow-up, sPN preserved renal function (after matching, eGFR, 71.4 vs. 54.0, P < 0.001) and prevented eGFR loss (after matching: 6.6% vs. 25.6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Salvage partial nephrectomy offers a better alternative than sRN for recurrence after initial PN, as sPN preserves renal function better while maintaining parallel tumor control and acceptable complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiwei Huang
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Ruopeng Su
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Cuijian Zhang
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Peking University, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Yige Bao
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoyi Hu
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiongjun Ye
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Minfeng Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jitao Wu
- Department of Urology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Yueming Wang
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Tang
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Peking University, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Zhiyang Huang
- Department of Urology, Quanzhou First Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Bing Zheng
- The Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Chancan Li
- The Department of Urology, AnHui NO.2 Provincial People Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Jianming Guo
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiran Huang
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Peking University, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, P. R. China.
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Okhawere KE, Grauer R, Zuluaga L, Meilika KN, Ucpinar B, Beksac AT, Razdan S, Saini I, Abramowitz C, Abaza R, Eun DD, Bhandari A, Hemal AK, Porter J, Stifelman MD, Menon M, Badani KK. Operative and oncological outcomes of salvage robotic radical and partial nephrectomy: a multicenter experience. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:1579-1585. [PMID: 36928751 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01538-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
We aim to describe the perioperative and oncological outcomes for salvage robotic partial nephrectomy (sRPN) and salvage robotic radical nephrectomy (sRRN). Using a prospectively maintained multi-institutional database, we compared baseline clinical characteristics and perioperative and postoperative outcomes, including pathological stage, tumor histology, operative time, ischemia time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), postoperative complication rate, recurrence rate, and mortality. We identified a total of 58 patients who had undergone robotic salvage surgery for a recurrent renal mass, of which 22 (38%) had sRRN and 36 (62%) had sRPN. Ischemia time for sRPN was 14 min. The median EBL was 100 mL in both groups (p = 0.581). One intraoperative complication occurred during sRRN, while three occurred during sRPN cases (p = 1.000). The median LOS was 2 days for sRRN and 1 day for sRPN (p = 0.039). Postoperatively, one major complication occurred after sRRN and two after sRPN (p = 1.000). The recurrence reported after sRRN was 5% and 3% after sRPN. Among the patients who underwent sRRN, the two most prevalent stages were pT1a (27%) and pT3a (27%). Similarly, the two most prevalent stages in sRPN patients were pT1a (69%) and pT3a (6%). sRRN and sRPN have similar operative and perioperative outcomes. sRPN is a safe and feasible procedure when performed by experienced surgeons. Future studies on large cohorts are essential to better characterize the importance and benefit of salvage partial nephrectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kennedy E Okhawere
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ralph Grauer
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Laura Zuluaga
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Kirolos N Meilika
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Burak Ucpinar
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Alp Tuna Beksac
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Shirin Razdan
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Indu Saini
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Chiya Abramowitz
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ronney Abaza
- Department of Urology, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, Dublin, OH, USA
| | - Daniel D Eun
- Department of Urology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Akshay Bhandari
- Division of Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Ashok K Hemal
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - James Porter
- Department of Urology, Swedish Urology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D Stifelman
- Department of Urology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Mani Menon
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ketan K Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Webster BR, Gopal N, Ball MW. Tumorigenesis Mechanisms Found in Hereditary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:2122. [PMID: 36421797 PMCID: PMC9690265 DOI: 10.3390/genes13112122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma is a heterogenous cancer composed of an increasing number of unique subtypes each with their own cellular and tumor behavior. The study of hereditary renal cell carcinoma, which composes just 5% of all types of tumor cases, has allowed for the elucidation of subtype-specific tumorigenesis mechanisms that can also be applied to their sporadic counterparts. This review will focus on the major forms of hereditary renal cell carcinoma and the genetic alterations contributing to their tumorigenesis, including von Hippel Lindau syndrome, Hereditary Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma, Succinate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma, Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Carcinoma, BRCA Associated Protein 1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis, Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome and Translocation RCC. The mechanisms for tumorigenesis described in this review are beginning to be exploited via the utilization of novel targets to treat renal cell carcinoma in a subtype-specific fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark W. Ball
- Center for Cancer Research, Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/NIH, 10 Center Drive, CRC Room 2W-5940, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|