1
|
Antony MB, Anari PY, Gopal N, Chaurasia A, Firouzabadi FD, Homayounieh F, Kozel Z, Gautam R, Gurram S, Linehan WM, Turkbey EB, Malayeri AA, Ball MW. Preoperative Renal Parenchyma Volume as a Predictor of Kidney Function Following Nephrectomy of Complex Renal Masses. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 57:66-73. [PMID: 38020527 PMCID: PMC10658405 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is a hereditary cancer syndrome with multifocal, bilateral cysts and solid tumors of the kidney. Surgical management may include multiple extirpative surgeries, which ultimately results in parenchymal volume loss and subsequent renal function decline. Recent studies have utilized parenchyma volume as an estimate of renal function prior to surgery for renal cell carcinoma; however, it is not yet validated for surgically altered kidneys with multifocal masses and complex cysts such as are present in VHL. Objective We sought to validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based volumetric analysis with mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) renogram and postoperative renal function. Design setting and participants We identified patients undergoing renal surgery at the National Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2020 with preoperative MRI. Renal tumors, cysts, and parenchyma of the operated kidney were segmented manually using ITK-SNAP software. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Serum creatinine and urinalysis were assessed preoperatively, and at 3- and 12-mo follow-up time points. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using serum creatinine-based CKD-EPI 2021 equation. A statistical analysis was conducted on R Studio version 4.1.1. Results and limitations Preoperative MRI scans of 113 VHL patients (56% male, median age 48 yr) were evaluated between 2015 and 2021. Twelve (10.6%) patients had a solitary kidney at the time of surgery; 59 (52%) patients had at least one previous partial nephrectomy on the renal unit. Patients had a median of three (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-5) tumors and five (IQR: 0-13) cysts per kidney on imaging. The median preoperative GFR was 70 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR: 58-89). Preoperative split renal function derived from MAG-3 studies and MRI split renal volume were significantly correlated (r = 0.848, p < 0.001). On the multivariable analysis, total preoperative parenchymal volume, solitary kidney, and preoperative eGFR were significant independent predictors of 12-mo eGFR. When only considering patients with two kidneys undergoing partial nephrectomy, preoperative parenchymal volume and eGFR remained significant predictors of 12-mo eGFR. Conclusions A parenchyma volume analysis on preoperative MRI correlates well with renogram split function and can predict long-term renal function with added benefit of anatomic detail and ease of application. Patient summary Prior to kidney surgery, it is important to understand the contribution of each kidney to overall kidney function. Nuclear medicine scans are currently used to measure split kidney function. We demonstrated that kidney volumes on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can also be used to estimate split kidney function before surgery, while also providing essential details of tumor and kidney anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria B. Antony
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pouria Y. Anari
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nikhil Gopal
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Aditi Chaurasia
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Fatemeh Homayounieh
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Zach Kozel
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rabindra Gautam
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sandeep Gurram
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - W. Marston Linehan
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Evrim B. Turkbey
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ashkan A. Malayeri
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark W. Ball
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rathi N, Palacios DA, Abramczyk E, Tanaka H, Ye Y, Li J, Yasuda Y, Abouassaly R, Eltemamy M, Wee A, Weight C, Campbell SC. Predicting GFR after radical nephrectomy: the importance of split renal function. World J Urol 2022; 40:1011-1018. [PMID: 35022828 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03918-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate a conceptually simple model to predict new-baseline-glomerular-filtration-rate (NBGFR) after radical nephrectomy (RN) based on split-renal-function (SRF) and renal-functional-compensation (RFC), and to compare its predictive accuracy against a validated non-SRF-based model. RN should only be considered when the tumor has increased oncologic potential and/or when there is concern about perioperative morbidity with PN due to increased tumor complexity. In these circumstances, accurate prediction of NBGFR after RN can be important, with a threshold NBGFR > 45 ml/min/1.73m2 correlating with improved overall survival. METHODS 236 RCC patients who underwent RN (2010-2012) with preoperative imaging (CT/MRI) and relevant functional data were included. NBGFR was defined as GFR 3-12 months post-RN. SRF was determined using semi-automated software that provides differential parenchymal-volume-analysis (PVA) from preoperative imaging. Our SRF-based model was: Predicted NBGFR = 1.24 (× Global GFRPre-RN) (× SRFContralateral), with 1.24 representing the mean RFC estimate from independent analyses. A non-SRF-based model was also assessed: Predicted NBGFR = 17 + preoperative GFR (× 0.65)-age (× 0.25) + 3 (if tumor > 7 cm)-2 (if diabetes). Alignment between predicted/observed NBGFR was assessed by comparing correlation coefficients and area-under-the-curve (AUC) analyses. RESULTS The correlation-coefficients (r) were 0.87/0.72 for SRF-based/non-SRF-based models, respectively (p = 0.005). For prediction of NBGFR > 45 ml/min/1.73m2, the SRF-based/non-SRF-based models provided AUC of 0.94/0.87, respectively (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION Previous non-SRF-based models to predict NBGFR post-RN are complex and omit two important parameters: SRF and RFC. Our proposed model prioritizes these parameters and provides a conceptually simple, accurate, and clinically implementable approach to predict NBGFR post-RN. SRF can be easily obtained using PVA software that is affordable, readily available (FUJIFILM-Medical-Systems), and more accurate than nuclear-renal-scans. The SRF-based model demonstrates greater predictive-accuracy than a non-SRF-based model, including the clinically-important predictive-threshold of NBGFR > 45 ml/min/1.73m2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nityam Rathi
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Diego A Palacios
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Emily Abramczyk
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Hajime Tanaka
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianbo Li
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yosuke Yasuda
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Robert Abouassaly
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Mohamed Eltemamy
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Alvin Wee
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Christopher Weight
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Steven C Campbell
- Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Room Q10-120, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|