An International Survey of Commonly Used Interventions for Management of Pelvic Pain

Recommendations for patient education in the management of persistent pelvic pain: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

ABSTRACT

Patient education has a critical role in the management of pain. There is considerable heterogeneity in patient education for females with persistent pelvic pain (PPP), and it remains unclear what is considered best clinical practice. Therefore, this systematic review identified and summarised recommendations for patient education in the management of benign gynaecological and urological conditions associated with PPP, as endorsed by international guidelines. Academic and relevant guideline databases were searched from inception to May 2022. Included guidelines were those for the management of benign gynaecological and urological conditions associated with PPP in adult females published in English, of any publication date, and endorsed by a professional organisation or society. Two independent reviewers screened 3097 records; 17 guidelines were included in the review. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool. Recommendations were pooled using descriptive synthesis. Persistent pelvic pain guideline quality was generally poor. Three guidelines were classified as "excellent" (The NICE, RANZCOG, and ESHRE endometriosis guidelines) and therefore recommended for use. Eleven guidelines (64.7%) recommended patient education for females with PPP. Recommendations for education content were variable, however most frequently covered treatment strategies and pelvic pain diagnoses. For education delivery, the most frequent recommendations were for support groups and written/printed materials. Further research into tailored education interventions is needed for females with PPP.

Dry needling perceptions and experiences: A survey of Australian physiotherapists

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of information on the use of dry needling in Australian physiotherapy practice.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary aim was to enhance the understanding of why Australian physiotherapists use dry needling in clinical practice. The secondary aim was to explore Australian physiotherapists experiences with adverse events caused by dry needling.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional online survey.

METHOD

We developed a survey and disseminated it through email to physiotherapists from all states and territories in Australia. Participant demographics and responses were reported as frequencies and percentages.

RESULTS/FINDINGS

We invited 1006 Australian physiotherapists, of which 232 (23%) viewed the online survey and 203 (20%) consented to participate, of which nearly all completed the survey (n = 198, 98%). Most respondents worked in private practice (n = 164, 83%), with 127 (64%) reporting using dry needling as an intervention within the previous 12 months. Physiotherapists typically used dry needling to decrease pain intensity (n = 105, 85%) and reduce muscle tension (n = 100, 81%). Reports of minor adverse events were common and included discomfort during the treatment (n = 77, 62%) and bruising (n = 69, 56%). Some respondents reported experiencing major adverse events including prolonged aggravation of symptoms (n = 10, 8%) and syncope (n = 16, 13%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that many Australian physiotherapists in private practice use dry needling, usually to decrease pain intensity and muscle tension. Minor adverse events were experienced by more than half the respondents and between 8 and 13% of the Australian physiotherapists surveyed reported experiencing a major adverse event due to dry needling.

Treatment recommendations for the management of persistent pelvic pain: A systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Females with persistent pelvic pain (PPP) report great variability in treatments they are recommended despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that aim to standardise care. A clear consensus for the best practice care for PPP is required.

OBJECTIVE

Identify and summarise treatment recommendations across CPGs for the management of PPP, and appraise their quality.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, EmCare, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science Core Collection, and relevant guideline databases were searched from their inception to June 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Included CPGs were those for the management of urogynaecological conditions in adult females published in English, of any publication date, and endorsed by a professional organisation or society.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We screened 1,379 records and included 20 CPGs. CPG quality was assessed using The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool. Descriptive synthesis compiled treatment recommendations across CPGs.

MAIN RESULTS

CPGs for seven conditions provided 281 individual recommendations. On quality appraisal, guidelines on average scored 'excellent' for the domains 'scope and purpose' (80.6%, SD=13.3) and 'clarity and presentation' (74.4%, SD=12.0); for other domains, average scores were satisfactory or poor. Four guidelines (Endometriosis, NICE, RANZCOG, ESHRE; PCOS, Teede et al. 2018) were deemed recommended for use. Recommendations were most frequent for pharmaceutical and surgical interventions. Recommendations were variable for psychological, physiotherapy, and other conservative interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of CPGs for PPP is generally poor. Several CPGs endorse the consideration of biopsychosocial elements of PPP. Yet most recommend pharmaceutical, surgical, and other biomedical interventions.

A survey of American physical therapists' current practice of dry needling: Practice patterns and adverse events

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the proportion of physical therapists currently performing dry needling and report current practices patterns. Secondary aims were to report the numbers of minor and major adverse events and determine if these adverse events were related to therapist characteristics.

METHODS

An anonymous electronic survey was distributed through special interest groups within the United States to physical therapists. Participant demographics and responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Associations between variables were examined using chi-square.

RESULTS

The estimated response rate was 14.4% (n = 865, mean age 39.89, SD 11.73 years). More than half (55.0%, n = 461) of respondents perform dry needling; levels of training varied. Most (78.8%, n = 337) performed 0-3 needling sessions per day, usually lasting < 15 min (67.3% of respondents, n = 288). Therapists commonly performed 3-6 sessions over a patient's course of care (82.0% of respondents, n = 350). Minor adverse events were common; respondents estimated this occurred in 39.6% (SD 31.5) of treatments. Major adverse events were rare, typically not requiring emergency care. Being male (X² = 8.197, P = 0.004), experienced (>4 years; X² = 34.635, P < 0.001), and having more training (>61 h; X² = 8.503, P = 0.004) were associated with reporting a major adverse event occurred during their career.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of physical therapists surveyed performed dry needling. Practice patterns were consistent with expert opinion. The number of adverse events reported suggests further research is needed to quantify the risks of dry needling. Participant characteristics associated with a major adverse event appear to be related to the number of exposures.

Riding a Tiger: Maximizing Effects of Manual Therapies for Pelvic Pain

Manual therapy interventions are frequently used during the management of pelvic pain conditions. Pain relief after any intervention results from effects unrelated to the intervention, effects specific to the intervention, and effects of context in which the intervention is provided. Understanding these multiple mechanisms allows providers of manual therapy to maximize outcomes by deliberately harnessing each of these core elements of pain relief.