Pulmonologist-Performed Per-Esophageal Needle Aspiration of Parenchymal Lung Lesions Using an EBUS Bronchoscope: Diagnostic Utility and Safety

Systematic endoscopic staging of mediastinum to determine impact on radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer (SEISMIC): protocol for a prospective single arm multicentre interventional study

Background

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is established as the preferred method of mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Selective (targeted) LN sampling is most commonly performed however studies in early stage NSCLC and locally advanced NSCLC confirm systematic EBUS-TBNA evaluation improves accuracy of mediastinal staging. This study aims to establish the rate of detection of positron emission tomography (PET)-occult LN metastases following systematic LN staging by EBUS-TBNA, and to determine the utility of systematic mediastinal staging for accurate delineation of radiation treatment fields in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for diagnosis/staging of locally advanced NSCLC will be enrolled in this international multi-centre single arm study. Systematic mediastinal LN evaluation will be performed, with all LN exceeding 6 mm to be sampled by TBNA. Where feasible, endoscopic ultrasound staging (EUS-B) may also be performed. Results of minimally invasive staging will be compared to FDG-PET. The primary end-point is proportion of patients in whom systematic LN staging identified PET-occult NSCLC metastases. Secondary outcome measures include (i) rate of nodal upstaging, (ii) false positive rate of PET for mediastinal LN assessment, (iii) analysis of clinicoradiologic risk factors for presence of PET-occult LN metastases, (iv) impact of systematic LN staging in patients with discrepant findings on PET and EBUS-TBNA on target coverage and dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Discussion

With specificity of PET of 90%, guidelines recommend tissue confirmation of positive mediastinal LN to ensure potentially early stage patients are not erroneously denied potentially curative resection. However, while confirmation of pathologic LN is routinely sought, the exact extent of mediastinal LN involvement in NSCLC in patient with Stage III NSCLC is rarely established. Studies examining systematic LN staging in early stage NSCLC report a significant discordance between PET and EBUS-TBNA. In patients with locally advanced disease this has significant implications for radiation field planning, with risk of geographic miss in the event of PET-occult mediastinal LN metastases. The SEISMIC study will examine both diagnostic outcomes following systematic LN staging with EBUS-TBNA, and impact on radiation treatment planning.

Trial registration

ACTRN12617000333314, ANZCTR, Registered on 3 March 2017.

Accuracy and Predictors of Success of EUS-B-FNA in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Malignant Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Italian Study

BACKGROUND

The role of endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) in the diagnosis of suspected malignant pulmonary lesions adjacent to the esophagus has been poorly investigated. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of EUS-B-FNA for the diagnosis and molecular profiling of paraesophageal pulmonary lesions, as well as its predictors of success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent EUS-B-FNA for the diagnosis of paraesophageal lesions were consecutively enrolled in four Italian centers. Demographic, clinical, procedural, pathological, and molecular characteristics of the malignant samples were collected. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy for pulmonary malignancies. Secondary outcomes were diagnostic yield and predictors of success for diagnosis and molecular profiling.

RESULTS

107 adult patients (60 [56.1%] males; median (interquartile range) age: 69 [60-70] years) were enrolled. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-B-FNA was 95.3% in the overall cohort and 95.2% in the 99 patients with a final diagnosis of malignancy. Neither clinical nor procedural variables significantly affected the diagnostic accuracy, whereas rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), performed by pathologists or trained pulmonologists, was a strong predictor for a complete molecular profiling (OR [95% CI]: 12.9 [1.2-137.4]; p value: 0.03).

CONCLUSION

EUS-B-FNA is a safe and accurate method for the diagnosis of paraesophageal pulmonary lesions. The presence of ROSE is relevant for a complete molecular profiling in this selected cohort of patients with advanced lung cancer.

Thoracic endosonography (EBUS/EUS-b) in the diagnosis of different intrathoracic diseases: A 4-year experience at a single-centre in Greece

BACKGROUND

In the last decade, the advent of thoracic endosonography has revolutionised the field of diagnostic bronchoscopy.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre prospective study in "Sotiria" Chest diseases hospital between January 2016 and December 2019. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and diagnostic value of combined EBUS/EUS-b in comparison with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-b FNA in different intrathoracic diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients were enrolled (70.7% males, 85.7% smokers, mean age ± SD: 62.8 ± 11.8). Diagnosis and staging of suspected lung cancer (LC) were the main indications for EBUS/EUS-b in 56.7% of patients, followed by lymphadenopathy of unknown origin in 27%, lymphadenopathy in previous malignancy in 10.9%, and staging of proven LC in 5.3%. EUS-b FNA alone or combined with EBUS-TBNA was performed in 14.7% of patients. A total of 512 lymph nodes was sampled (481 through EBUS-TBNA and 31 through EUS-b FNA). EBUS/EUS-b led to a definitive diagnosis in 68.4% of the patients. Most cases (50.4%) were malignancies, while 18% represented benign diseases (83.3% sarcoidosis). Sensitivity of combined EBUS/EUS-b was higher in comparison with sensitivity of both procedures alone (100% vs 89.4% vs 88.9%). Accordingly, the overall sensitivity of EBUS/EUS-b for the detection of malignancy and sarcoidosis was 93% and 95.2%, respectively. No severe complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Thoracic endosonography is an efficient, safe, minimally invasive tool yielding high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected malignancy and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Experienced pulmonologists in EBUS-TBNA should more routinely perform EUS-b FNA to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions.

Endoscopic transoesophageal fine-needle aspiration with convex probe bronchoscope for diagnosis of coeliac lymphadenopathy

Endoscopic transoesophageal fine-needle aspiration with a convex probe bronchoscope (EUS-B-FNA) is a complementary technique to endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) for the staging of mediastinal lymph nodes [1]. The safety and feasibility of EUS-B-FNA for sampling pulmonary parenchymal lesions and adrenal lesions has been reported [2, 3]. Recent literature also suggest a role for EUS-B-FNA in the diagnosis of infective lymphadenitis [4]. Here we present two cases of successful sampling of coeliac lymph nodes to further extend the utility of EUS-B-FNA in the assessment of patients with suspected or confirmed lung cancer. Localisation of nodes during the procedure did not involve fluoroscopy and relied upon linear EBUS guidance. Sampling was successfully performed with a 22-G TBNA needle.

EUS-B-FNA is a feasible and accurate technique for diagnosis of extrathoracic lesionshttps://bit.ly/34TFMR8

Characterization of Lung Tumors that the Pulmonologist can Biopsy from the Esophagus with Endosonography (EUS-B-FNA)

BACKGROUND

According to guidelines, it is possible to biopsy lung tumors "immediately adjacent to the esophagus" with EUS-B-FNA. However, it is unknown what "immediately adjacent" exactly means.

OBJECTIVE

to investigate the possibility of achieving EUS-B-FNA biopsies from a lung tumor depending on the distance from the esophagus and to establish the maximal allowable distance between the tumor and the esophagus.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study, we included patients with a lung tumor located maximum 6 cm from the esophagus and indication of EUS-B-FNA from the tumor. The tumors were of different sizes. In a plot presenting the tumor size-distance relationship in cases with (biopsy) versus without (non-biopsy) successful EUS-B-FNA, a separation line representing the threshold between the groups were identified and a biopsy-index equation established. The maximal tumor-size corrected distance (TSCD) was calculated using the residuals to the separation line.

RESULTS

In total, 70 patients were included. EUS-B-FNA from the lung tumor was possible in 46 patients. All tumors with a distance from the esophagus below 19 mm could be biopsied. The maximal allowable esophagus-tumor distance depended on tumor size. From the separation line, a biopsy-index equation was established with the sensitivity of 93.5%, a specificity of 100%, and total accuracy of 95.7%. The TSCD was 31 mm (sensitivity: 95.7%, specificity 75.0%, and accuracy: 88.6%).

CONCLUSION

We established a biopsy-index equation to predict the achievability of a lung tumor using EUS-B-FNA depending on distance to esophagus and tumor size. A general maximal TSCD was 31 mm.

Transoesophageal Fine Needle Aspiration of Pleural Metastasis Using EBUS Scope

Endoscopic ultrasound using convex endobronchial ultrasound probe (EUS-B) is an evolving diagnostic technique. We present a case of successful EUS-B biopsy of pleural metastasis in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. This was an accurate, uncomplicated procedure and demonstrates the feasibility of EUS-B for pleural lesions.

EBUS-TBNA versus EUS-B-FNA for the evaluation of undiagnosed mediastinal lymphadenopathy: The TEAM randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a standard of care modality for the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Transesophageal Bronchoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-B-FNA), wherein one introduces the EBUS bronchoscope through the esophageal route, is also a safe and efficacious diagnostic modality for sampling the mediastinal lymph nodes. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield and patient comfort with these two available approaches.

METHODS

We randomized subjects with predominant subcarinal or lower left paratracheal mediastinal lymph node enlargement to either EBUS-TBNA or EUS-B-FNA (50 to each group). Co-Primary objectives were the comparison of adequate and diagnostic aspirates between groups. Key secondary objectives were a comparison of Operator rated cough and Operator rated procedural comfort on Visual Analog scale (VAS), procedure duration and complications between the groups.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The proportion of adequate (EBUS-TBNA 46/50; 92% and EUS-B-FNA 48/50;96%, P = 0.4) and diagnostic aspirates (EBUS-TBNA 38/50; 76% and EUS-B-FNA 36/50;74%, P = 0.4) were similar between the two groups. Operator rated cough was significantly less, and Operator rated patient comfort significantly higher with the EUS-B-FNA approach. Procedure duration was significantly shorter with EUS-B-FNA [18.1(14.4) minutes versus 16.4 (49.6) minutes, P < 0.001]. Minor complications occurred in one patient in the EBUS-TBNA group and none in the EUS-B-FNA group.

CONCLUSION

During the endosonographic evaluation for undiagnosed mediastinal lymphadenopathy located at predominantly the subcarinal or lower left paratracheal stations, EUS-B-FNA as compared with EBUS-TBNA provides greater patient comfort with a similar diagnostic yield.

Safe performance of diagnostic bronchoscopy/EBUS during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

The SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic is unprecedented in our professional lives and much effort and resources will be devoted to care of patients (and HCW) affected by this illness. We must also continue to aim for the same standard of care for our non‐COVID respiratory patients, while minimizing risks of infection transmission to our colleagues. This commentary addresses the key paired issues of minimizing performance of diagnostic/staging bronchoscopy in patients with suspected/known lung cancer while maximizing the safety of the procedure with respect to HCW transmission of COVID‐19.

EUS-B for suspected left adrenal metastasis in lung cancer

Background

Several studies have reported the efficacy of esophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for the detection of metastases in the left adrenal gland (LAG) in patients with lung cancer. Currently we have only limited evidence based on small studies on the usefulness of EUS-B [endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope into the esophagus] to provide tissue proof of suspected LAG metastases. The objectives of this study are to investigate feasibility, safety and diagnostic yield of EUS-B-FNA in LAG analysis in patients with proven or suspected lung cancer.

Methods

In two Danish hospitals, a systematic search in the electronic database for patients who underwent EUS-B-FNA of the LAG for suspected or proven lung cancer was performed retrospectively between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2017. Computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-CT, endoscopy, pathology and follow-up data were acquired.

Results

One hundred and thirty-five patients were included; the prevalence of biopsy proven LAG malignancy was 30% (40/135). A total of 87% (117/135) of EUS-B-FNA samples were adequate (i.e., containing adrenal or malignant cells). No complications were observed.

Conclusions

We present the largest cohort of patients ever reported showing that EUS-B-FNA of the LAG is a safe and feasible procedure and should therefore be used for staging purposes in patients with lung cancer and a suspicious LAG.

Endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound: it only takes an echobronchoscope to tango

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is indispensable when it comes to evaluation of mediastinal lesion and staging of lung cancer. The incorporation of endoscopic ultrasound using an echobronchoscope (EUS-B) further extends this capability to the paraoesophageal and subdiaphragmatic structures. When combined, EBUS with EUS-B increases the diagnostic yield. Both procedures can be done in a single session and by a single operator; this translates into an overall reduction in the healthcare cost.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Iodine-125 Radioactive Seed Implantation as a Novel Therapy for Mediastinal Tumors

Objective: This study aims to test the treatment effect of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided interstitial iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) seed implantation for mediastinal lymph node metastasis or advanced mediastinal lung cancer. Materials and Methods: The patients with mediastinal lymph node metastasis or advanced mediastinal lung cancer, who had undergone surgery for resection of primary lesions and repeated chemotherapy or external radiotherapy, were selected and scheduled to undergo EBUS-guided ¹²⁵I seed implantation from December 2015 to May 2017. Forty patients were included into this study. Clinical data of these patients were collected and the short-term effects were observed. Then, the feasibility for treating mediastinal tumors was retrospectively analyzed. The follow-up period ranged within 1-6 months. Results: The procedure was successfully completed, and all patients well tolerated the procedure without any major complications. The response evaluation criteria in solid tumors were utilized to test the treatment effect, and the overall response rates (complete remission + partial remission) at postoperative 2, 4, and 6 months were 65.00% (13/20), 80.00% (16/20), and 85.0% (17/20), respectively. All patients of this study survived throughout the follow-up period. Conclusions: This experience revealed that EBUS-guided ¹²⁵I radioactive seed implantation is effective and safe, and is a prospective approach for treating patients with mediastinal lymph node metastasis or advanced mediastinal lung cancer.

Utility of Endobronchial Ultrasound in Assessment of Intrathoracic Lesions in Paediatric Patients

INTRODUCTION

In adults, linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is the preferred modality to sample intrathoracic adenopathy and radial EBUS is a useful tool to biopsy peripheral pulmonary nodules. Utility in children is less well known.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to review the EBUS experience of two specialist centres to better define the current role of EBUS in paediatric practice.

METHODS

A retrospective record review of EBUS procedures undertaken in patients aged 0-17 years at the Royal Children's Hospital (Melbourne, Australia) and Thoraxklinik (Heidelberg, Germany) was performed. Data extracted included patient demographics, clinical presentation, bronchoscope (size and model), EBUS technique used, pathologic results, need for further invasive investigation, and complications.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2017, ten EBUS procedures were performed (6 linear EBUS and 4 radial EBUS). No complications were reported. Linear EBUS was performed on subjects who were between 4 and 15 years old, with a 100% diagnostic yield. Radial EBUS was non-diagnostic in three cases of non-malignant disease. In one case, it was used successfully for imaging alone.

CONCLUSION

Both linear and radial EBUS are safe and feasible in children. Diagnostic yield of linear EBUS was 100%. Radial EBUS did not demonstrate utility, likely reflecting the pathologies of underlying parenchymal masses in paediatric populations.

[A Case of Left Upper Lobe Lung Cancer Successfully Diagnosed by Transesophageal Endoscopic Ultrasound with Bronchoscope-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Alone]

A 58-year-old Japanese woman with fever and cough visited A hospital. Her chest X-ray and CT showed a tumor attached to the mediastinum in the left upper lobe with mediastinal lymphadenopathy (#4R). After an introduction from A hospital to our hospital, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for the mediastinal lymphadenopathy and a simultaneous approach to the mass lesion in the left upper lobe were performed. In spite of twice aspiration by EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy, we failed to obtain enough specimens, and, as the mass lesion in the left upper lobe was invisible in the endobronchial ultrasound, we could not approach it. Then using the same ultrasound bronchoscope, we subsequently performed a transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) to the mass lesion in the left upper lobe twice, with the result that sufficient tissues were obtained. Then we changed from the ultrasound bronchoscope to a normal bronchoscope and we performed brushing and transbronchial lung biopsy for the left upper lobe mass lesion. Pathological results revealed that only the specimens obtained by EUS-B-FNA were diagnostic for adenocarcinoma; the other specimens obtained using EBUS-TBNA and normal bronchoscope failed to be diagnostic. EUS-B-FNA in combination with EBUS-TBNA has been recommended for the diagnosis of mediastinal and near-mediastinal lesions in the guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians in 2013, but EUS-B-FNA has not been widely used in Japan. As shown in our present patient who was successfully diagnosed as having lung cancer by EUS-B-FNA alone, respiratory physicians should be aware of being skillful at performing EUS-B-FNA to accurately and effectively approach target lesions.

Endoscopic Ultrasound with Bronchoscope-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Paraesophageally Located Lung Lesions

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing centrally located lung tumors without endobronchial abnormalities and not located near the major airways is a diagnostic challenge. Tumors near or adjacent to the esophagus can be aspirated and detected with esophageal ultrasound (EUS) using gastrointestinal endoscopes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) in paraesophageally located lung tumors and its added value to bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS).

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter international study (from January 1, 2015 until January 1, 2018) of patients with suspected lung cancer, undergoing bronchoscopy, EBUS, and endoscopic ultrasound bronchoscopy (EUS-B) in one session by a single operator (pulmonologist), in whom the primary lung tumor was detected and aspirated by EUS-B. In the absence of malignancy following endoscopy, transthoracic ultrasound needle aspiration, clinical and radiological follow-up of at least 6 months was performed. The yield and sensitivity of EUS-B-FNA and its added value to bronchoscopy and EBUS was assessed.

RESULTS

58 patients were identified with the following diagnosis: non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 43), small-cell lung cancer (n = 6), mesothelioma (n = 2), metastasis (n = 1), nonmalignant (n = 6). The yield and sensitivity of EUS-B-FNA for detecting lung cancer was 90%. In 26 patients (45%), the intrapulmonary tumor was exclusively detected by EUS-B. Adding EUS-B to conventional bronchoscopy and EBUS increased the diagnostic yield for diagnosing lung cancer in para-esophageally located lung tumors from 51 to 91%. No EUS-B-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

EUS-B-FNA is a feasible and safe technique for diagnosing centrally located intrapulmonary tumors that are located near or adjacent to the esophagus. EUS-B should be considered in the same endoscopy session following nondiagnostic bronchoscopy and EBUS.

Transesophageal approach to lung, adrenal biopsy and fiducial placement using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS): An interventional pulmonology experience. Initial experience of the UCSF-FRETOC (fresno tracheobronchial & oesophageal center) study group

BACKGROUND

Routine lung cancer surveillance has resulted in early detection of pulmonary nodules and masses. Combined endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and trans-esophageal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are approved methods for sampling lymph nodes or masses. Furthermore, EUS allows for adrenal sampling as part of staging, and can assist with fiducial placement for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

OBJECTIVES

Promote use of EUS by interventional pulmonologists in the United States when diagnosing and staging lung cancer or when placing fiducials.

METHODS

All patients undergoing EUS and/or EBUS were serially entered into a prospectively maintained database. Only patients undergoing EUS guided lung and/or adrenal biopsy and/or fiducial placement were selected for analysis. All patients underwent a post-procedure chest radiograph and were followed outpatient.

RESULTS

20 of 39 patients underwent sampling of a suspicious lung mass. An adequate sample was obtained in 19 of 20 patients. In all 19 patients a definitive diagnosis was achieved (95%). In all 13 patients who underwent adrenal sampling, presence or absence of metastasis was conclusively established. 6 patients successfully underwent fiducial placement. In all 39 patients, no major procedure related complications were noted for a period of 30 days. One patient had a small pneumothorax that resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS can be safely performed by a trained interventional pulmonologist for the diagnosis of lung, adrenal masses and placement of fiducials. We think that interventional pulmonologists in the United States involved in lung cancer staging should receive training in EUS techniques.

Initial report of transesophageal EUS-guided intraparenchymal lung mass core biopsy: Findings and outcomes in two cases

EUS is most commonly used to evaluate and sample lesions of the abdomen but has only been used on rare occasions to evaluate and sample lung lesions. Prior reported cases of EUS sampling of lung lesions were performed by fine-needle aspiration. We present what is believed to be the first reported cases of EUS-guided core biopsy of intraparenchymal lung lesions through two separate case reports. Both patients had the upper lobe lesions not amenable to bronchoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound, and both patients underwent core biopsy without adverse event. This report of two cases shows that EUS-guided core biopsy of intraparenchymal lung lesions is technically possible and may not necessarily result in adverse events such as hemorrhage, pneumothorax, or infection.

Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration by experienced pulmonologists: a cusum analysis

Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) is an established, minimally invasive way to sample intrathoracic abnormalities. The EBUS scope can be passed into the oesophagus to perform endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA). In cases of suspected lung cancer, a combination of the two techniques is now recommended by consensus guidelines. EBUS TBNA is usually performed by pulmonologists; however, the learning curve for EUS-B-FNA, which may be performed during the same procedure, has not been described.A multicentre, observational Australian study, using prospectively collected data from three experienced pulmonologists was conducted. Cumulative sum (cusum) analysis was used to generate visual learning curves.A total of 152 target lesions were sampled in 137 patients, with an overall sensitivity for malignancy of 94.8%. The sensitivity for malignant lesions outside of the 2009 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer lymph node map (largely intraparenchymal lesions) was 92.9%. All three operators were competent by conventional cusum criteria. There was one case of pneumothorax, and no episodes of mediastinitis or oesophageal perforation were observed.Our data suggest that experienced pulmonologists can safely and accurately perform EUS-B-FNA, with a high diagnostic sensitivity for both lymph node and non-nodal lesions.

Pulmonologist-performed transoesophageal sampling for lung cancer staging using an endobronchial ultrasound video-bronchoscope: an Australian experience

BACKGROUND

Transoesophageal endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) video-bronchoscope insertion provides pulmonologists access to conduct endoscopic fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) of mediastinal lymph node (LN) lesions and also assist in lung cancer staging by sampling left adrenal gland (LAG) lesions. Limited literature has described additional diagnostic value whilst maintaining patient safety. To elicit whether combining endoscopic transoesophageal fine-needle aspiration using convex probe bronchoscope (EUS-B-FNA) and EBUS bronchoscopy enhances the diagnostic yield of mediastinal nodal staging in lung cancer, whilst maintaining safety.

METHODS

All eligible patients with paraoesophageal lesions on thoracic computed tomography (CT) underwent pulmonologist-performed EUS-B-FNA at two tertiary centres and were included in this prospective observational cohort study.

RESULTS

EUS-B-FNA sampling was performed at 69 mediastinal LN lesion sites, including 17 sites inaccessible to bronchoscopic sampling. Four LAG lesions were sampled via EUS-B-FNA. There were no complications. EBUS-TBNA was augmented by EUS-B-FNA because of accessibility of sampling lesions otherwise unamenable bronchoscopically, thereby increasing diagnostic utility. Diagnostic sensitivity of EUS-B-FNA for malignancy in mediastinal LN lesions was 88% (51 of 58). For mediastinal LN lesions not amenable to EBUS-TBNA, the sensitivity for diagnosis of malignancy via EUS-B-FNA was 88% (15 of 17). Diagnostic sensitivity of EUS-B-FNA for malignancy in LAG lesions was 50% (2 of 4).

CONCLUSION

EUS-B-FNA is a precise and safe approach in the evaluation and staging of lung cancer when performed by a pulmonologist. It complements and increases the diagnostic utility of EBUS-TBNA by further coverage of mediastinal LN stations and access to LAG lesions.

Esophageal Endosonography for the Diagnosis of Intrapulmonary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Biopsy-based diagnosis in patients with paraesophageal intrapulmonary tumors suspected of lung cancer is crucial for adequate treatment planning.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis of intrapulmonary tumors located near or adjacent to the esophagus.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42016033737) and searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, and Web of Science on September 22, 2016, without date or language restrictions. We included studies that evaluated the yield and/or sensitivity of EUS-FNA for diagnosing intrapulmonary tumors. Yield was defined as the number of patients in whom EUS-FNA made a biopsy-proven diagnosis (malignant or nonmalignant) relative to the total number of patients on whom EUS-FNA was performed. Sensitivity was defined as the number of patients in whom EUS-FNA made a biopsy-proven diagnosis of malignancy relative to the total number of patients in whom the tumor was found to be malignant. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 3,320 search results, 11 studies were included. Ten had a high risk of bias. The total number of patients was 313; the proportion of patients with malignancy ranged from 87 to 100% across these studies. The average yield was 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.95) and the average sensitivity was 0.92 (0.83-0.96). In the subgroup of prospective studies (n = 3), the average yield was 0.80 (0.56-0.93) and the average sensitivity was 0.83 (0.58-0.95). EUS-FNA-induced complications were reported for 5/256 patients (2.0%) for whom this information was available.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of high-quality studies is limited, these findings suggest that EUS-FNA is safe and has a high yield for diagnosing intrapulmonary tumors.

The role of the team physician in school athletics

Background

Convenient approaches for accurate biopsy are extremely important to the diagnosis of lung cancer. We aimed to systematically review the clinical updates and development trends of approaches for biopsy, i.e., CT-guided PTNB (Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy), ENB (Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy), EBUS-TBNA (Endobroncheal Ultrasonography-Transbronchial Needle Aspiration), mediastinoscopy and CTC (Circulating Tumor Cell).

Methods

Medline and manual searches were performed. We identified the relevant studies, assessed study eligibility, evaluated methodological quality, and summarized diagnostic yields and complications regarding CT-guided PTNB (22 citations), ENB(31 citations), EBUS-TBNA(66 citations), Mediastinoscopy(15 citations) and CTC (19 citations), respectively.

Results

The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT-guided PTNB were reported to be 92.52% ± 3.14% and 97.98% ± 3.28%, respectively. The top two complications of CT-guided PTNB was pneumothorax (946/4170:22.69%) and hemorrhage (138/1949:7.08%). The detection rate of lung cancer by ENB increased gradually to 79.79% ± 15.34% with pneumothorax as the top one complication (86/1648:5.2%). Detection rate of EBUS-TBNA was 86.06% ± 9.70% with the top three complications, i.e., hemorrhage (53/8662:0.61%), pneumothorax (46/12432:0.37%) and infection (34/11250:0.30%). The detection rate of mediastinoscopy gradually increased to 92.77% ± 3.99% with .hoarseness as the refractory complication (4/2137:0.19%). Sensitivity and specificity of CTCs detection by using PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) were reported to be 78.81% ± 14.72% and 90.88% ± 0.53%, respectively.

Conclusion

The biopsy approaches should be chosen considering a variety of location and situation of lesions. CT-guided PTNB is effective to reach lung parenchyma, however, diagnostic accuracy and incidence of complications may be impacted by lesion size or needle path length. ENB has an advantage for biopsy of smaller and deeper lesions in lung parenchyma. ENB plus EBUS imaging can further improve the detection rate of lesion in lung parenchyma. EBUS-TBNA is relatively safer and mediastinoscopy provides more tissue acquisition and better diagnostic yield of 4R and 7th lymph node. CTC detection can be considered for adjuvant diagnosis.