Reporting Standards for Diagnostic Testing: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals

Optimal approach for diagnosing peripheral lung nodules by combining electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound

INTRODUCTION

Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) are essential bronchoscopic procedures for diagnosing peripheral lung lesions. Despite their individual advantages, the optimal circumstances for their combination remain uncertain.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study enrolled 473 patients with 529 pulmonary nodules who underwent ENB and/or RP-EBUS biopsies between December 2021 and December 2022. Diagnostic yield was calculated using strict, intermediate, and liberal definitions. In the strict definition, only malignant and specific benign lesions were deemed diagnostic at the time of the index procedure. The intermediate and liberal definitions included additional results from the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The diagnostic yield of the strict definition was not statistically different among the three groups (ENB/Combination/RP-EBUS 63.8%/64.2%/62.6%, p = 0.944). However, the diagnostic yield was superior in the ENB + RP-EBUS group for nodules with a bronchus type II or III and a solid part <20 mm (odds ratio 1.96, 95% confidence interval 1.09-3.53, p = 0.02). In terms of complications, bleeding was significantly higher in the ENB + RP-EBUS group (ENB/Combination/RP-EBUS 3.7% /6.2/0.6%, p = 0.002), but no major adverse event was observed.

CONCLUSION

The combination of ENB and RP-EBUS enhanced the diagnostic yield for nodules with bronchus type II or III and solid part <20 mm, despite a slightly elevated risk of bleeding. Careful patient selection based on nodule characteristics is important to benefit from this combined approach.

Robotic-assisted Navigation Bronchoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Yield and Complications

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted navigation bronchoscopy (RANB) is a novel method to biopsy lung nodules, with initial reports demonstrating excellent accuracy. We aimed to evaluate pooled estimates of diagnostic yields and complication rates with RANB by performing a meta-analysis of the available literature.

METHODS

We searched 3 databases, including PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science. The resulting abstracts were reviewed by 2 investigators. Analyses were performed using random effects models, and diagnostic yield and complication rates were estimated after the Freeman-Tukey transformation.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles, comprising 1409 patients and 1541 nodules, were included in the final analysis. Mean ages ranged from 63.2 to 69.3 years. The average size of the nodules ranged between 5.9 and 25.0 mm. Most patients (54.0% to 92.0%) had a current or prior smoking history in studies that reported them (n=8). The pooled diagnostic yield was 81.9% (12 studies, 838 nodules, 95% CI: 83.4%-91.0%), and the pooled sensitivity for malignancy was 87.6% (8 studies, 699 nodules, 95% CI: 81.3%-89.5%). The pooled incidence of pneumothorax rates was 0.60% (95% CI: 0.11%-1.35%). The pooled incidence of major bleeding was <0.01%.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic yield for patients with pulmonary nodules undergoing RANB is high, though may be impacted by the prevalence of malignancy, participant selection, and publication bias. Complication rates, including pneumothoraces and bleeding rates, appear low across all studies. If RANB is available, clinicians should consider utilizing this platform to biopsy pulmonary nodules.