1
|
Kiviharju M, Heinonen A, Jakobsson M, Virtanen S, Auvinen E, Kotaniemi-Talonen L, Dillner J, Kyrgiou M, Nieminen P, Aro K, Kalliala I. Overtreatment rate after immediate local excision of suspected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A prospective cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:167-173. [PMID: 36153296 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The gold standard of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treatment is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) after histopathological diagnosis from punch biopsies. In addition, treatment may be appropriate at initial colposcopy. Our objective was to study the applicability of immediate treatment strategy according to clinical parameters. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study among patients referred to colposcopy at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 2014, and September 2018 (ISRCTN10933736). Patients treated with LLETZ, either after biopsies or immediately at initial colposcopy, were included. The main outcome measure was overtreatment (OT) rate defined as normal or low-grade histopathological findings in LLETZ specimen within both treatment groups. RESULTS A total of 572 patients treated with LLETZ were included: 360 treated after biopsies and 212 treated immediately at initial colposcopy. When LLETZ was performed immediately after high-grade referral cytology and with colposcopic impression of high-grade disease, the overtreatment (OT) rate was 10.0% (95% CI 9.10 to 17.2), whereas when LLETZ was done after biopsy-confirmed high-grade lesions, the OT rate was 18.9% (95% CI 14.7 to 23.7), resulting in risk difference (RD) -8.91% (95% CI -16.0 to -1.82). Among HPV16/18 positive patients the OT rate was 8.22% (95% CI 3.08 to 17.0) for immediate treatment, resulting in RD of -10.7% (95% CI -18.3 to -3.04) compared to LLETZ after biopsies. CONCLUSIONS Immediate LLETZ does not result in overtreatment when applied on selected cases, especially after high-grade referral cytology and when high-grade lesion is also colposcopically suspected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kiviharju
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Annu Heinonen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maija Jakobsson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää Hospital, HUCH and University of Helsinki, 05850 Hyvinkää, Finland
| | - Seppo Virtanen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eeva Auvinen
- Department of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Laura Kotaniemi-Talonen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Finland
| | | | - Maria Kyrgiou
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, W120NN, London, UK
| | - Pekka Nieminen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Karoliina Aro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Ilkka Kalliala
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, 00029 Helsinki, Finland; Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction - Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, W120NN, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bensemmane S, Loayza Villarroel K, Montaño K, Louati E, Ascarrunz C, Rodriguez P, Fontaine V, Laokri S. Assessing Barriers Encountered by Women in Cervical Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Care in Urban Bolivia, Cochabamba. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10091604. [PMID: 36141216 PMCID: PMC9498362 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10091604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Timely detection of cervical cells infected with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) improves cervical cancer prevention. In Bolivia, actual screening coverage only reaches 33.3% of the target population aged between 25 and 64 years despite free cytology screening. Furthermore, 50% to 80% screened women are lost during follow-up. This study aimed at identifying factors explaining this lack of follow-up care. Method: During the first phase, face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with HPV-positive women. Secondly, we explored the reasons for the non-adherence to the follow-up care: knowledge, perceptions and beliefs about HPV, as well as barriers to healthcare access, using a structured survey on Cochabamba women and healthcare professionals. Results: Barriers to effective follow-up of the targeted populations were associated with health system shortcomings, including poor service delivery at the front- and second-line, health providers shortage, inadequate training, waiting time, high direct and indirect costs of care seeking and care, complex procedures to obtain HPV screening results and poor patient–provider communication. The follow-up was perceived as extremely stressful by the participants. Conclusion: Improved communication on HPV and HPV-related cancers in terms of representation in the general population and among the health professional’s population is vital to improve access for HPV infection follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherihane Bensemmane
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Health Services Research, Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Katherine Loayza Villarroel
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
- Question Santé asbl, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kevin Montaño
- Instituto de Investigacion en Ciencas Sociales INCISO, Universidad Mayor de San Simon (UMSS), Cochabamba, Bolivia
| | - Elyas Louati
- Faculté de Pharmacie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Campus Plaine, Boulevard du Triomphe, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carla Ascarrunz
- Instituto de Investigacion en Ciencas Sociales INCISO, Universidad Mayor de San Simon (UMSS), Cochabamba, Bolivia
| | - Patricia Rodriguez
- Laboratorio de Virologia, Facultad de Medicina, UMSS, Cochabamba, Bolivia
| | - Véronique Fontaine
- Faculté de Pharmacie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Campus Plaine, Boulevard du Triomphe, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-2-6505296
| | - Samia Laokri
- Faculté de Pharmacie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Campus Plaine, Boulevard du Triomphe, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, 1440 Canal St, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| |
Collapse
|