Added value of electrical impedance spectroscopy in adjunction of colposcopy: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) as an adjunctive technology enhances the performance of colposcopy.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University Hospital colposcopy clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

Colposcopy with EIS for 647 women and conventional colposcopy for 962 women.

INTERVENTIONS

Comparison of the performance of colposcopy by referral cervical cytology in two cohorts, with and without EIS as an adjunctive technology.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+), diagnostic testing accuracy to detect CIN2+ with and without EIS and their relative differences between cohorts.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CIN2+ varied between the cohorts according to referral cytology: 17.0% after abnormal squamous cells of unknown significance referral cytology in EIS cohort and 9.1% in the reference cohort, 16.5% and 18.9% after low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 44.3% and 58.2% after atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (atypical squamous cells that cannot exclude HSIL), and 81.9% and 77.0% after HSIL cytology, respectively. Sensitivity to detect CIN2+ was higher in the EIS cohort, varying from 1.79 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.45) after LSIL referral cytology to 1.16 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.23) after HSIL referral cytology, with correspondingly lower specificity after any referral cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

Colposcopy with EIS had overall higher sensitivity but lower specificity to detect CIN2+ than conventional colposcopy. CIN2+ prevalence rates were, however, not consistently higher in the EIS cohort, suggesting innate differences between the cohorts or truly lower detection rates of CIN2+ for EIS, highlighting the need for randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of EIS.

Overtreatment rate after immediate local excision of suspected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The gold standard of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treatment is large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) after histopathological diagnosis from punch biopsies. In addition, treatment may be appropriate at initial colposcopy. Our objective was to study the applicability of immediate treatment strategy according to clinical parameters.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study among patients referred to colposcopy at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 2014, and September 2018 (ISRCTN10933736). Patients treated with LLETZ, either after biopsies or immediately at initial colposcopy, were included. The main outcome measure was overtreatment (OT) rate defined as normal or low-grade histopathological findings in LLETZ specimen within both treatment groups.

RESULTS

A total of 572 patients treated with LLETZ were included: 360 treated after biopsies and 212 treated immediately at initial colposcopy. When LLETZ was performed immediately after high-grade referral cytology and with colposcopic impression of high-grade disease, the overtreatment (OT) rate was 10.0% (95% CI 9.10 to 17.2), whereas when LLETZ was done after biopsy-confirmed high-grade lesions, the OT rate was 18.9% (95% CI 14.7 to 23.7), resulting in risk difference (RD) -8.91% (95% CI -16.0 to -1.82). Among HPV16/18 positive patients the OT rate was 8.22% (95% CI 3.08 to 17.0) for immediate treatment, resulting in RD of -10.7% (95% CI -18.3 to -3.04) compared to LLETZ after biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate LLETZ does not result in overtreatment when applied on selected cases, especially after high-grade referral cytology and when high-grade lesion is also colposcopically suspected.

Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer: Results after two screening rounds in a regional screening program in Finland

INTRODUCTION

Since 2012, cervical cancer screening has been conducted with a primary high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test and conventional cytology triage in the city of Tampere, Finland. The women who were screened with the hrHPV test in 2012 were invited to participate in the second screening round in 2017. The aim of the present report was to compare the number of colposcopy referrals and the number of histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)+ (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN2+]) lesions between the first and second screening rounds of women of a specific age group who were screened twice with the hrHPV test.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The primary hrHPV test used was the RealTime hrHPV PCR assay by Abbott. Women with a positive hrHPV test and cytology triage equal to or worse than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or atypical glandular cells, favor neoplasia, were directly referred to colposcopy, whereas hrHPV-positive women with a negative or equivocal cytology triage were re-screened after approximately 12-16 months. hrHPV-negative women were scheduled for re-screening after 5 years. The present report focuses on the cohort of women who were screened twice with the hrHPV test, who were 35-55 years old in 2012, and 40-60 years old in 2017.

RESULTS

In all, 8076 women were invited for HPV screening in 2012 and 8331 women were invited for the second round 5 years later, with attendance rates of 70% and 71%, respectively. Of the women who were screened in 2012, 4571 (69%) belonged to the 35- to 55-year age cohort. In 2017, 4807 (73%) of the women aged 40-60 years participated in the screening. In this cohort, 185 (4.0%) colposcopies were performed in the first screening round, compared with 139 (2.9%) in the second round, and the colposcopy rate was 29% smaller in the second round (P = .002). The number of histological HSIL+ cases was 38 (0.8%) during the first screening round and 29 (0.6%) during the second round (P = .220).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of routine organized cervical cancer screening, the initially high colposcopy rate associated with primary HPV screening seems to level off at the second screening round in women who were screened twice with an hrHPV test.

The HPV test has similar sensitivity but more overdiagnosis than the Pap test--a randomised health services study on cervical cancer screening in Finland

We compared test sensitivity (in terms of prevented cancers) and overdiagnosis (in terms of non-progressive pre-invasive lesions) between the human papillomavirus test (HPV test, Hybrid Capture 2) and the traditional Pap test in routine screening for cervical cancer. The design was a randomised (1:1) health services study in Finland with intake between 2003 and 2007. We estimated sensitivity by the incidence method within one screening round. Overdiagnosis was based on the rate of cervical intraepithelial Grade 3 (CIN3) lesions diagnosed at screen and during the following interval. Out of 203,788 randomised women 132,298 attended (65% in both study arms) and 600,753 person-years accumulated among attenders up to the end of 2010. In all attenders, 34 invasive cervical cancers and 288 CIN3 lesions were diagnosed at screen or during the following interval. The interval cancer incidence was 2.5/10(5) person-years (sensitivity 0.87) and 1.4 (sensitivity 0.93) in the HPV arm and Pap test arm, respectively. The rate of CIN3 lesions was 57.1 and 38.8, respectively. In conclusion, sensitivity of HPV testing was similar to that of Pap testing but caused more overdiagnosis. Therefore, implementation of HPV testing needs to be reconsidered especially in countries with well organised programmes.

Intensified screening among high risk women within the organised screening programme for cervical cancer in Finland

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on a five-year follow-up of 130 692 women who participated in the five-yearly organised screening in Finland in 1995, we estimated the risk for incident invasive cervical cancer and severe precancerous lesion for groups of women with different combinations of high-risk determinants at baseline.

RESULTS

Compared to women with normal cytology and no symptoms at the index screen, the risk of developing invasive cervical cancer during the next screening interval was significantly elevated in women with abnormal cytology at baseline screen (RR 5.8, 95% CI 2.6-13.1); additionally, the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) lesions was even higher (RR 9.4, 95% CI 6.9-12.5), both results after removing respective screen detected cases at index screen. Among women with symptoms of vaginal bleeding or abnormal vaginal discharge but normal cytology the risk of invasive cervical cancer was increased but not significantly (RR 2.4, 95% CI 0.9-6.3) and the risk of CIN3 lesions was only slightly elevated (RR 1.5, 95% CI 0.95-2.4). In women less than 40 years of age, the risk of cervical cancer was 50% higher than in women 40 years or more in those with normal cytology and no symptoms, however not significantly. Symptoms indicated a similarly elevated risk for cancer in both age groups. After abnormal cytology there was a nine-fold risk for cancer in young women (under 40 years) and a six-fold risk in old women (40 years or more) when compared to women aged 40 or more with no symptoms and normal cytology. In young women CIN3 lesions were found in great excess, three times more often, compared to those aged 40 and over.

DISCUSSION

In all, selective intensified screening for cervical cancer complementing the five-yearly unselective programme is feasible for women with abnormal cytological findings at an acceptable level of incremental cost.

Rate of cervical cancer, severe intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ in primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage: randomised study within organised screening programme

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance and impact of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA screening with cytology triage compared with conventional cytology on cervical cancer and severe pre-cancerous lesions.

DESIGN

Randomised trial.

SETTING

Population based screening programme for cervical cancer in southern Finland in 2003-5.

PARTICIPANTS

58 076 women, aged 30-60, invited to the routine population based screening programme for cervical cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

Primary HPV DNA test (hybrid capture II) with cytology triage if the result was positive or conventional cytological screening (reference).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade III, and adenocarcinoma in situ (as a composite outcome referred to as CIN III+) during 2003-7 through record linkage between files from the screening registry and the national cancer registry.

RESULTS

In the HPV and conventional arms there were 95 600 and 95 700 woman years of follow-up and 76 and 53 cases of CIN III+, respectively (of which six and eight were cervical cancers). The relative rate of CIN III+ in the HPV arm versus the conventional arm was 1.44 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.05) among all women invited for screening and 1.77 (1.16 to 2.74) among those who attended. Among women with a normal or negative test result, the relative rate of subsequent CIN III+ was 0.28 (0.04 to 1.17). The rate of cervical cancer between arms was 0.75 (0.25 to 2.16) among women invited for screening and 1.98 (0.52 to 9.38) among those who attended.

CONCLUSIONS

When incorporated into a well established organised screening programme, primary HPV screening with cytology triage was more sensitive than conventional cytology in detecting CIN III+ lesions. The number of cases of cervical cancer was small, but considering the high probability of progression of CIN III the findings are of importance regarding cancer prevention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23885553.

Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing has shown higher sensitivity than cytology for detecting cervical lesions, but it is uncertain whether the higher sensitivity is dependent on the age of the woman being screened. We compared the age-specific performance of primary HPV DNA screening with that of conventional cytology screening in the setting of an organized population-based cervical cancer screening program in Finland.

METHODS

From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2005, randomized invitations were sent to women aged 25-65 years for routine cervical cancer screening by primary high-risk HPV DNA testing (n = 54 207) with a Hybrid Capture 2 assay followed by cytology triage for women who were HPV DNA positive or by conventional cytology screening (n = 54 218). In both screening arms, cytology results of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse triggered a referral for colposcopy. Relative rates (RRs) of detection to assess test sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the histological endpoints of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1 or higher (CIN 1+), CIN grade 2 or higher (CIN 2+), and CIN grade 3 or higher (CIN 3+). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The overall frequency of colposcopy referrals was 1.2% in both screening arms. Women younger than 35 years were referred more often in the HPV DNA screening vs the conventional screening arm (RR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.60). The prevalence of histologically confirmed CIN or cancer was 0.59% in the HPV DNA screening arm vs 0.43% in the conventional screening arm. The relative rates of detection for CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3+ for HPV DNA screening with cytology triage vs conventional screening were 1.44 (95% CI = 0.99 to 2.10), 1.39 (95% CI = 1.03 to 1.88), and 1.22 (95% CI = 0.78 to 1.92), respectively. The specificity of the HPV DNA test with cytology triage was equal to that of conventional screening for all age groups (99.2% vs 99.1% for CIN 2+, P = .13). Among women aged 35 years or older, the HPV DNA test with cytology triage tended to have higher specificity than conventional screening. The PPVs for HPV DNA screening with cytology triage were consistently higher than those for conventional screening. In both screening arms, the test specificities increased with increasing age of the women being screening, whereas the highest PPVs were observed among the youngest women being screened. Overall, 7.2% of women in the HPV DNA screening arm vs 6.6% of women in the conventional screening arm were recommended for intensified follow-up, and the percentages were highest among 25- to 29-year-olds (21.9% vs 10.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage is more sensitive than conventional screening. Among women aged 35 years or older, primary HPV DNA screening with cytology triage is also more specific than conventional screening and decreases colposcopy referrals and follow-up tests.

Prevalence of oncogenic human papillomavirus infection in an organised screening population in Finland

A persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is a necessary condition for developing a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. The viral aetiology in cervical carcinogenesis has stimulated attempts to use HPV DNA detection in cervical cancer screening. In Finland there is an ongoing study assessing the benefits of primary HPV DNA testing in the setting of centrally organised mass screening for cervical cancer. Here we present the age-specific prevalence of hrHPV infection and associated sociodemographic factors of 16,895 women aged 25-65 years attending the 5-yearly cervical cancer screening between years 2003 and 2004. The overall hrHPV prevalence rate was 7.5%. The peak prevalence at the age group of 25-29 was 24.1% decreasing steadily thereafter to approximately 2.9% in women aged 65 years. Young age and marital status were the main determinants for oncogenic HPV types. Our study confirms the inverse relationship between age and hrHPV prevalence reported in many developed countries. As our prevalence rates and hence background risk for cervical cancer are not lower than in other European countries, it is likely that our lowest cervical cancer burden in Europe is due to health care actions justifying the organised cervical cancer screening.

Randomized evaluation trial on automation-assisted screening for cervical cancer: results after 777,000 invitations

OBJECTIVES

New cervical screening methods have been developed. They seem to become accepted in routine use without randomized trials, within existing screening programmes. Our aim was to evaluate, in a randomized setting, the performance of automation-assisted cytological screening in routine use compared with conventional Papanicoalou (Pap) screening.

SETTING

This prospective study was based on a 1:2 individually randomized design. Altogether 777,144 women were invited to attend the routine screening programme.

RESULTS

Automation-assisted screening found more Pap class III (LSIL+) findings compared with conventional study arm, relative risk (RR) 1.08 (confidence interval 1.01-1.15). Also, detection rates of verified pre-cancers were more common in automation-assisted arm, RR 1.11 (1.02-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Automation-assisted screening performed well compared with conventional screening. The difference was smaller than reported in non-randomized studies. A new technique may assume several years to reach the ultimate quality and can add costs without improving efficacy. Follow-up of prevented cervical cancers is required.

Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer screening programmes have markedly reduced the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. A substantial amount of deaths from the disease could be prevented further by organised screening programmes or improving currently running programmes.

METHODS/DESIGN

We present here a randomised evaluation trial design integrated to the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme, in order to evaluate renewal of the programme using emerging technological alternatives. The main aim of the evaluation is to assess screening effectiveness, using subsequent cancers as the outcome and screen-detected pre-cancers as surrogates. For the time being, approximately 863,000 women have been allocated to automation-assisted cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, or to conventional cytology within the organised screening programme. Follow-up results on subsequent cervical cancers will become available during 2007-2015.

DISCUSSION

Large-scale randomised trials are useful to clarify effectiveness and cost-effectiveness issues of the most important technological alternatives in the screening programmes for cervical cancer.

Significant variation in performance does not reflect the effectiveness of the cervical cancer screening programme in Finland

AIM

To characterise the variation in performance indicators of the Finnish cervical screening programme by screening laboratory and to assess whether the performance affects cervical cancer incidence.

METHODS

Cervical cancer screening data from 1999 to 2003 from six well-established laboratories were used to analyse rates for follow-up recommendations, referrals and histologically confirmed dysplastic lesions. Laboratory-specific cervical cancer incidences for 1954-2003 were assessed using the cancer registry files.

RESULTS

Differences in follow-up recommendations were up to 3.1-fold and 2.2-fold in referrals; differences in the rates for CIN1, CIN2 and CIN3+ were up to 4.5-, 4.7-, and 1.5-fold, respectively. Pre-screening incidence rates for cervical cancer varied 1.5-fold by laboratory, with no major differences in the incidence trends since the onset of screening.

CONCLUSION

The performance of a cervical screening programme differs by screening laboratory but does not materially affect the overall programme effectiveness. This leads to variation in cost-effectiveness and probably in avoidable adverse effects. In cervical cancer screening studies, the outcome should be selected as closely as possible to the true measure of programme effectiveness, prevented invasive cervical cancers and subsequent deaths.

Routine cervical screening with primary HPV testing and cytology triage protocol in a randomised setting

The role of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing in primary cervical screening has not been established. We generated a randomised evaluation design ultimately to clarify whether primary hrHPV testing implemented into routine screening can bring increase in the programme effectiveness. The aim of the present report on first-year results was to assess the cross-sectional relative validity parameters for routine hrHPV screening, in comparison with conventional screening. An equal number of women invited to routine screening was randomly allocated to primary hrHPV screening (n=7060) and to cytological screening (n=7089). In the hrHPV screening arm, after a single positive hrHPV test result, the need of colposcopy referral was determined by a cytological triage test. Compared with the conventional arm, more colposcopy referrals were made in the hrHPV screening arm (relative risk 1.51, confidence interval 95% 1.03–2.22). Specificity of the primary screening with sole hrHPV test (91.5–92.1%) was much lower than that with the cytology triage (98.7–99.3%), which was not quite as specific as screening with conventional cytology (99.2–99.6%). Compared with conventional cytology, primary screening with hrHPV test results in increased cross-sectional relative sensitivity at the level of all positive lesions at the cost of substantial loss in specificity. With cytology triage, the specificity improves to the level of conventional cytology.