Prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide with the sequential organ failure assessment score in septic shock

N-Terminal B Natriuretic Peptide as a Prognostic Marker in Sepsis Induced Myocardial Dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) is an increasingly recognized form of transient cardiac dysfunction in sepsis patients. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluation of N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) as a predictor of SIMD and poor outcome in patients with sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: Forty patients were enrolled and divided into: Group 1 with sepsis; Group 2 with septic shock. Each group was subdivided according to the presence or absence of cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography, NT-pro BNP - assay on the 1st and 2nd days of admission - were performed. RESULTS: NT-pro BNP level was significant predictor for cardiomyopathy in all case group with 75% sensitivity, 70% specificity (cutoff level >334 pg/ml) on 1st day of admission and 65% sensitivity, and 80% specificity (cutoff level >325 pg/ml) on 2nd day. On subgroup analysis, pro-BNP had 70% sensitivity, 90% specificity; cutoff level >334 pg/ml for prediction of cardiomyopathy in sepsis group and 70% sensitivity and 80% specificity; cutoff level >357pg/ml in septic shock group. Pro-BNP on 2nd day was excellent predictor of mortality in septic shock group with 100% sensitivity and specificity; cutoff level >350 pg/ml. CONCLUSION: N terminal pro-BNP is a good diagnostic and prognostic indicator for cardiomyopathy and mortality in septic patients.

Natriuretic Peptides to Predict Short-Term Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Data are conflicting regarding the optimal cutoffs of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to predict short-term mortality in patients with sepsis. We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus) for English-language reports of studies evaluating adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock with BNP/NT-proBNP levels and short-term mortality (intensive care unit, in-hospital, 28-day, or 30-day) published from January 1, 2000, to September 5, 2017. The average values in survivors and nonsurvivors were used to estimate the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) using a parametric regression model. Thirty-five observational studies (3508 patients) were included (median age, 51-75 years; 12%-74% males; cumulative mortality, 34.2%). A BNP of 622 pg/mL had the greatest discrimination for mortality (sensitivity, 0.695 [95% CI, 0.659-0.729]; specificity, 0.907 [95% CI, 0.810-1.003]; area under the ROC, 0.766 [95% CI, 0.734-0.797]). An NT-proBNP of 4000 pg/mL had the greatest discrimination for mortality (sensitivity, 0.728 [95% CI, 0.703-0.753]; specificity, 0.789 [95% CI, 0.710-0.867]; area under the ROC, 0.787 [95% CI, 0.766-0.809]). In prespecified subgroup analyses, identified BNP/NT-proBNP cutoffs had higher discrimination if specimens were obtained 24 hours or less after admission, in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, in patients enrolled after 2010, and in studies performed in the United States and Europe. There was inconsistent adjustment for renal function. In this hypothesis-generating analysis, BNP and NT-proBNP cutoffs of 622 pg/mL and 4000 pg/mL optimally predicted short-term mortality in patients with sepsis. The applicability of these results is limited by the heterogeneity of included patient populations.

The role of natriuretic peptides in the management, outcomes and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock

Sepsis continues to be a leading public health burden in the United States and worldwide. With the increasing use of advanced laboratory technology, there is a renewed interest in the use of biomarkers in sepsis to aid in more precise and targeted decision-making. Natriuretic peptides have been increasingly recognized to play a role outside of heart failure. They are commonly elevated among critically ill patients in the setting of cardiopulmonary dysfunction and may play a role in identifying patients with sepsis and septic shock. There are limited data on the role of these biomarkers in the diagnosis, management, outcomes and prognosis of septic patients. This review seeks to describe the role of natriuretic peptides in fluid resuscitation, diagnosis of ventricular dysfunction and outcomes and the prognosis of patients with sepsis. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) have been noted to be associated with left ventricular systolic and diastolic and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with septic cardiomyopathy. BNP/NT-proBNP may predict fluid responsiveness, and trends of these peptides may play a role in fluid resuscitation. Despite suggestions of a correlation with mortality, the role of BNP in mortality outcomes and prognosis during sepsis needs further evaluation.

The utility of brain natriuretic peptides in septic shock as markers for mortality and cardiac dysfunction: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review evaluating the utility of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) as biomarkers in adult patients with septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed/Medline databases were searched from inception to November 2018 using the search terms: (septic[Title/Abstract] AND shock[Title/Abstract]) AND bnp[Title/Abstract]) and (septic[Title/Abstract]) AND shock[Title/Abstract]) AND natriuretic[Title/Abstract]). No restriction was applied regarding date of publication. Comparative observational studies evaluating BNP and NT-proBNP in patients with septic shock aged ≥18 years were eligible for inclusion. Bibliographies from the extracted articles were also reviewed to identify additional relevant publications.

RESULTS

In total, 46 studies met all eligibility criteria and were included. A strong body of literature has demonstrated that in patients with septic shock, increased values of BNP and NT-proBNP are associated with increased mortality. An increase from baseline BNP values has also been associated with increased mortality, whereas decreases from baseline values are not related to worse outcome. Brain natriuretic peptides have also been associated with cardiac dysfunction in patients with sepsis. Moreover, BNP values have been found to be significantly elevated in septic shock, regardless of cardiac dysfunction, and have been used to distinguish between septic and cardiogenic shock. Furthermore, BNP and NT-proBNP are significantly increased in patients with septic shock, compared to patients with sepsis and severe sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

BNP and NT-proBNP appear to be reliable predictors of outcome in septic shock.

Clinical outcome comparison of patients with septic shock defined by the new sepsis-3 criteria and by previous criteria

Background

We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes between the new definition of sepsis-3 septic shock and the definition previously used from 1991 until recently.

Methods

We conducted an observational study using a prospective, multi-center registry of septic shock from October 2015 to February 2017. Registry data were collected by 10 emergency departments (EDs) in tertiary hospitals that are members of the Korean Shock Society. Data on septic shock patients who met the previous septic shock definition were collected. The patients were divided into a sepsis-3 defined septic shock group, made up of those who met the new criteria for refractory hypotension with hyperlactatemia, and a group of those who met only the 1991 definition for septic shock. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, and secondary outcomes were 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Of all 1,028 included patients, 574 (55.8%) met the septic shock criteria for sepsis-3, leaving 454 patients who met only the previous definition. Those who met the sepsis-3 criteria demonstrated higher comorbidity than those who met the previous definition (83.1% vs. 75.3%, P<0.01), but there was no difference in infection focus. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) (initial/maximal), the acute physiology, and the chronic health evaluation II scores were significantly higher in for those who met the sepsis-3 criteria [6.5±3.1 vs. 5.0±2.9, 9.3±3.8 vs. 6.6±3.4, and 20.0 (15.0-26.0) vs. 15.0 (10.0-20.3), respectively; P<0.01]. The 90-day mortality was significantly higher in the sepsis-3 group (32.1% vs. 23.3%; P<0.01). In-hospital and 28-day mortality were also higher in the sepsis-3 group (26.8% vs. 17.1% and 25.1% vs. 16.5%, respectively; P<0.01).

Conclusions

The new definition of septic shock successfully selected patients with greater severities and worse outcomes.