Does the relationship between natriuretic hormones and diastolic function differ by race?

Serial measurement of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin T for cardiovascular disease risk assessment in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

BACKGROUND

N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponin T (TnT) predict cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in a variety of populations. Whether their predictive value varies by ethnicity is unknown. We sought to determine whether NT-proBNP and TnT improve prediction of incident coronary heart disease (CHD) and CVD, independent of CVD risk factors, in a multiethnic population; whether NT-proBNP improves prediction compared with the Framingham Risk Score or the Pooled Cohort Risk Equation; and whether a second NT-proBNP further improves prediction.

METHODS

Both NT-proBNP and TnT were measured in 5,592 MESA white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese participants (60% nonwhite; mean age 62.3 ± 10.3 years) in 2000 to 2002 and 2004 to 2005. We evaluated adjusted risk of incident CHD and CVD based on baseline and change in biomarker concentration.

RESULTS

Participants were followed up through 2011 and incurred 370 CVD events (232 CHD). Concentrations of NT-proBNP and TnT varied by ethnicity. Both NT-proBNP and TnT were associated with an increased risk of events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for CHD [95% CI] for fifth quintile vs other 4 quintiles of NT-proBNP, 2.03 [1.50-2.76]; HR for CHD for detectable vs undetectable TnT, 3.95 [2.29-6.81]). N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide improved risk prediction and classification compared with the Framingham Risk Score and the Pooled Cohort Risk Equation. Change in NT-proBNP was independently associated with events (HR for CHD per unit increase in ΔlogNT-proBNP, 1.95 [1.16-3.26]). None of the observed associations varied by ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Both NT-proBNP and TnT are predictors of incident CHD, independent of established risk factors and ethnicity, in a multiethnic population without known CVD. Change in NT-proBNP may add additional prognostic information.

Association of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and natriuretic peptide with incident ESRD: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic data for cardiac abnormality predating decreased kidney function are sparse. We investigated the associations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) risk in a community-based cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

10,749 white and black participants at the fourth visit (1996-1998) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study with follow-up through 2010.

PREDICTOR

hs-cTnT (3, 6, 9, and 14ng/L) and NT-proBNP (41.6, 81.0, 142.5, and 272.5pg/mL) levels were divided into 5 categories at the same percentiles (32th, 57th, 77th, and 91th; corresponding to ordinary thresholds of hs-cTnT), with the lowest category as a reference.

OUTCOMES

Incident ESRD defined as initiation of dialysis therapy, transplantation, or death due to kidney disease.

MEASUREMENTS

Relative risk and risk prediction of ESRD according to hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP levels based on Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 13.1 years, 235 participants developed ESRD (1.8 cases/1,000 person-years). hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP levels were associated with ESRD risk independently of each other and of potential confounders, including kidney function and albuminuria (adjusted HRs for highest category, 4.43 [95% CI, 2.43-8.09] and 2.28 [95% CI, 1.44-3.60], respectively). For hs-cTnT level, the association was significant even at the third category (HR for 6-8ng/L of hs-cTnT, 2.74 [95% CI, 1.54-4.88]). Their associations were largely consistent even among persons without decreased kidney function or history of cardiovascular disease. hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP levels both significantly improved ESRD prediction (C statistic differences of 0.0084 [95% CI, 0.0005-0.0164] and 0.0045 [95% CI, 0.0004-0.0087], respectively, from 0.884 with conventional risk factors).

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small number of ESRD cases and single measurement of hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP.

CONCLUSIONS

hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP levels independently predicted ESRD risk in the general population, with more evident results for hs-cTnT. These results suggest the involvement of cardiac abnormality, particularly cardiac injury, in the progression of reduced kidney function and/or may reflect the useful property of hs-cTnT as an end-organ damage marker.