1
|
Redó MA, Gil IP, Pérez-Carbonell T, González CE, Ventura AM, Algarra JM. Prospective study of sound localisation in patients with single sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss treated with cochlear implant. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2024:S2173-5735(24)00062-0. [PMID: 38797372 DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Sound localization plays a crucial role in our daily lives, enabling us to recognize voices, respond to alarming situations, avoid dangers, and navigate towards specific signals. However, this ability is compromised in patients with Single-Sided Deafness (SSD) and Asymmetric Hearing Loss (AHL), negatively impacting their daily functioning. The main objective of the study was to quantify the degree of sound source localization in patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss using a Cochlear Implant (CI) and to compare between the two subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective, longitudinal, observational, single-center study involving adult patients diagnosed with profound unilateral or asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss who underwent cochlear implantation. Sound localization was assessed in a chamber equipped with seven speakers evenly distributed from -90º to 90º. Stimuli were presented at 1000 Hz and intensities of 65 dB, 70 dB, and 75 dB. Each stimulus was presented only once per speaker, totaling 21 presentations. The number of correct responses at different intensities was recorded, and angular error in degrees was calculated to determine the mean angular distance between the patient-indicated speaker and the speaker presenting the stimulus. Both assessments were conducted preoperatively without a cochlear implant and two years post-implantation. RESULTS The total sample comprised 20 patients, with 9 assigned to the SSD group and 11 to the AHL group. The Preoperative Pure Tone Average (PTA) in free field was 31.7 dB in the SSD group and 41.8 dB in the AHL group. There was a statistically significant improvement in sound localization ability and angular error with the use of the cochlear implant at all intensities in both SSD and AHL subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Cochlear implantation in patients with SSD and AHL enhances sound localization, reducing mean angular error and increasing the number of correct sound localization responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Aragonés Redó
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Ignacio Pla Gil
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Tomàs Pérez-Carbonell
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Clara Espina González
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Morant Ventura
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jaime Marco Algarra
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wazen JJ, Kim CS, Ortega C, King T, Schwartz SR, Zeitler DM. Benefits of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss: Audiologic and patient-related outcome measures. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104138. [PMID: 38101137 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the benefits of cochlear implantation in adults with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). STUDY DESIGN Prospective within-subjects repeated-measures. SETTING Two tertiary cochlear implant centers. PATIENTS Fourteen adults with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in the worse hearing ear and up to moderate SNHL in the better hearing ear. INTERVENTION Cochlear implantation in the worse hearing ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) test, AzBio sentence test in noise, and lateralization testing were conducted preoperatively and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-activation. Patient-related outcomes were measured using the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale and Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory was administered to subjects with tinnitus. RESULTS Mean length of hearing loss in the worse hearing ear was 3.5 years. The mean CNC change scores from baseline were 54.8, 55.9, and 58.9 percentage points at 3-, 6-, and 12-months (p < 0.001). AzBio sentence test in noise demonstrated improved scores in all spatial configurations, although statistically significant in S0N0 (speech front, noise front) only. Lateralization testing showed significant improvement of 22.9, 24.5, and 24.0 percentage points at 3-, 6-, and 12 months post-activation (p = 0.002). All patient-related outcome measures revealed significant improvement. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates improved speech perception in noise, sound lateralization, quality of life, and reduction in tinnitus perception in adults with SSD/AHL who undergo cochlear implantation. Our results add to the growing body of evidence that cochlear implant should be offered to this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack J Wazen
- First Physicians Group Silverstein Institute, 1901 Floyd Street, Sarasota, FL 34239, United States of America
| | - Christine S Kim
- First Physicians Group Silverstein Institute, 1901 Floyd Street, Sarasota, FL 34239, United States of America.
| | - Carmelo Ortega
- First Physicians Group Silverstein Institute, 1901 Floyd Street, Sarasota, FL 34239, United States of America
| | - Tonya King
- Sarasota Memorial Hospital Research Institute, 1700 South Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL 34239, United States of America
| | - Seth R Schwartz
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, United States of America
| | - Daniel M Zeitler
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spitzer ER, Attlassy Y, Roland JT, Waltzman SB. Early cochlear implantation for children with single sided deafness. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 177:111857. [PMID: 38244481 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Single-sided deafness (SSD) can have consequences for a child's language, educational, and social development. A cochlear implant (CI) is the only device which can restore true binaural hearing, yet they are only approved for children with (SSD) over the age of five in the United States. Reports on speech perception outcomes for children implanted at a younger age are limited. The present study aims to examine the effects of age at implantation, duration of deafness, hearing loss etiology, and presence of additional disabilities on device usage and speech perception outcomes. METHODS A retrospective chart review was used to examine demographics and speech perception outcomes for 18 children implanted at age five or younger. RESULTS Speech perception results were highly variable, with some children deriving significant benefit and others demonstrating no sound awareness through the implant alone. Age at implantation and duration of deafness did not have a clear impact on outcomes. Device usage was low in many children, often those with anatomical abnormalities such as a hypoplastic cochlear nerve. There are challenges to assessing speech perception in young children with SSD, leading to a lack of standardized outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Early CI for children with SSD may improve speech perception, but benefit is not guaranteed. Candidacy evaluation should consider both medical and audiological factors, in addition to the degree of family support and realistic expectations. Caution is especially warranted in children with significant anatomical anomalies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily R Spitzer
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Younes Attlassy
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Thomas Roland
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan B Waltzman
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muck S, Magele A, Wirthner B, Schoerg P, Sprinzl GM. Effects of Auditory Training on Speech Recognition in Children with Single-Sided Deafness and Cochlea Implants Using a Direct Streaming Device: A Pilot Study. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1688. [PMID: 38138915 PMCID: PMC10744358 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Treating individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD) with a cochlear implant (CI) offers significant benefits for speech perception in complex spatial listening environments. After implantation, training without involvement of the normal-hearing ear is essential. Therefore, the AudioLink streaming device (MED-EL GmbH, Austria) can be used to connect the externally worn audio processor to media devices; thus, the auditory stimuli are directly streamed to the implanted ear. The aim was to test whether children with SSD, aged 5-12 years, accept this training method and whether auditory training, streamed directly via AudioLink using the Tiptoi device (Ravensburger GmbH., Ravensburg, Germany), improves speech recognition. A total of 12 children with SSD and implanted with a CI received Tiptoi training via AudioLink and were asked to practice daily for 10 min over a period of one month. All participants completed the training. The measurements employed to assess improvement included speech audiometry, speech, spatial, and quality of hearing scale for parents (SSQ P), and specially designed tasks crafted for this study. Daily training of 9.93 min was reported. The word recognition score (WRS) at 65 dB and 80 dB in aided condition significantly improved and the WRS streamed via AudioLink was significantly better after training. The speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale for parents (SSQ P questionnaire) showed significant improvement in the dimension of quality of hearing and overall gain. The outcomes of the Tiptoi tasks resulted in a significant benefit in both categories of the "recognition of sounds" and "understanding of sentences". The results are very encouraging and do not only show the positive uptake of daily training at home but also how this resulted in a significant improvement in subjective and objective measures for this rather short training period of one month only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Muck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Clinic St. Poelten, 3100 St. Poelten, Austria; (S.M.); (A.M.); (B.W.); (P.S.)
| | - Astrid Magele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Clinic St. Poelten, 3100 St. Poelten, Austria; (S.M.); (A.M.); (B.W.); (P.S.)
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Implantable Hearing Devices, 3100 St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Bianca Wirthner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Clinic St. Poelten, 3100 St. Poelten, Austria; (S.M.); (A.M.); (B.W.); (P.S.)
| | - Philipp Schoerg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Clinic St. Poelten, 3100 St. Poelten, Austria; (S.M.); (A.M.); (B.W.); (P.S.)
| | - Georg Mathias Sprinzl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Clinic St. Poelten, 3100 St. Poelten, Austria; (S.M.); (A.M.); (B.W.); (P.S.)
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Implantable Hearing Devices, 3100 St. Poelten, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zeitler DM, Dunn C, Schwartz SR, McCoy JL, Jamis C, Chi DH, Goldberg DM, Anne S. Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Cochlear Implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:1511-1520. [PMID: 36934432 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 03/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) benefits with cochlear implantation (CI) in children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL) versus bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (BSNHL). STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional survey of parents of children who underwent CI for USNHL and BSNHL. SETTING Tertiary care academic centers. METHODS The "Children with cochlear implants: parental perspectives" survey was administered. Parents rated responses on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores greater than 3.0 were considered favorable. Responses were recorded within 8 domains and groups were compared with respect to domain scores. Analysis of covariance models was used to compare groups while adjusting for age at implantation and duration of implant use. RESULTS There were 31 patients with USNHL and 27 patients with BSNHL. The average age of implantation in BSNHL patients was 1.9 and 6.7 years for USNHL. Parents of all children answered favorably in all domains. When adjusted for age at implantation and duration of implant use, parents of BSNHL children responded significantly more favorably only in 2 domains. When comparing patients with older age or prolonged duration of hearing loss in the USNHL cohort, there were favorable responses in all domains with no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION There are HR-QOL benefits of CI in USNHL children; less pronounced favorable results were noted only in 2 domains when compared to BSNHL children. Benefits were noted with CI in USNHL children at an older age at implantation or prolonged duration of hearing loss. Therefore, these factors should not be absolute contraindications for CI in USNHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jennifer L McCoy
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - David H Chi
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitton TJ, Yancey KL, Isaacson B, Kutz W, Whitson J, Hunter JB. Audiometric and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Recipients Using the CIQOL-35. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:1156-1163. [PMID: 36871181 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Describe the effect that cochlear implantation (CI) has on audiometric outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary university hospital system. METHODS Preoperative and postoperative AzBio performance and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 (CIQOL-35) Profile scores in CI patients with SSD were compared, and postoperative measures were compared to those from CI patients without SSD. RESULTS Seventeen patients with unilateral CI and contralateral unaided pure-tone averages ≤30 dB were included. The median age was 60.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 50.9-64.9 years), and 7/17 (41%) were women. Median daily use was 8.2 hour (IQR, 5.4-11.9 h). The median preoperative AzBio quiet score in the ear to be implanted was 3% (IQR, 0%-6%). After a median follow-up of 12.0 months, the median postoperative AzBio quiet score was 76% (IQR, 47%-86%) (p < .01). SSD subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median scores on the following CIQOL-35 subdomains following implantation: Entertainment (17 preoperatively vs 21 postoperatively), Listening Effort (12 vs 14), Social (17 vs 22), and Global (28 vs 35; p < .05). SSD patients achieved equal or higher postoperative CIQOL-35 scores in most subdomains (6/7) compared to an age-matched group of non-SSD CI recipients who underwent unilaterally (N = 19) or sequential (N = 6) implantation. CONCLUSION SSD CI patients not only demonstrate significant improvements in speech perception testing in the implanted ear but also exhibit improvement in multiple QOL subdomains on the CIQOL-35, the only validated cochlear implant QOL instrument.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanner J Mitton
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kristen L Yancey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Brandon Isaacson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Walter Kutz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Johanna Whitson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jacob B Hunter
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gordon KA, Alemu R, Papsin BC, Negandhi J, Cushing SL. Effects of Age at Implantation on Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Children with Short Durations of Single-Sided Deafness. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:233-240. [PMID: 36728258 PMCID: PMC9924958 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Children with single-sided deafness (SSD) show reduced language and academic development and report hearing challenges. We aim to improve outcomes in children with SSD by providing bilateral hearing through cochlear implantation of the deaf ear with minimal delay. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study of 57 children with SSD provided with cochlear implant (CI) between May 13, 2013, and June 25, 2021. SETTING Tertiary children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS Children with early onset (n = 40) or later onset of SSD (n = 17) received CIs at ages 2.47 ± 1.58 years (early onset group) and 11.67 ± 3.91 years (late onset group) (mean ± SD). Duration of unilateral deafness was limited (mean ± SD = 1.93 ± 1.56 yr). INTERVENTION Cochlear implantation of the deaf ear. MAIN OUTCOMES/MEASURES Evaluations of device use (data logging) and hearing (speech perception, effects of spatial release from masking on speech detection, localization of stationary and moving sound, self-reported hearing questionnaires). RESULTS Results indicated that daily device use is variable (mean ± SD = 5.60 ± 2.97, range = 0.0-14.7 h/d) with particular challenges during extended COVID-19 lockdowns, including school closures (daily use reduced by mean 1.73 h). Speech perception with the CI alone improved (mean ± SD = 65.7 ± 26.4 RAU) but, in the late onset group, remained poorer than in the normal hearing ear. Measures of spatial release from masking also showed asymmetric hearing in the late onset group ( t13 = 5.14, p = 0.001). Localization of both stationary and moving sound was poor (mean ± SD error = 34.6° ± 16.7°) but slightly improved on the deaf side with CI use ( F1,36 = 3.95, p = 0.05). Decreased sound localization significantly correlated with poorer self-reported hearing. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Benefits of CI in children with limited durations of SSD may be more restricted for older children/adolescents. Spatial hearing challenges remain. Efforts to increase CI acceptance and consistent use are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen A. Gordon
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto
- Archie’s Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Department of Communication Disorders, The Hospital for Sick Children
| | - Robel Alemu
- Archie’s Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
| | - Blake C. Papsin
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto
- Archie’s Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jaina Negandhi
- Archie’s Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
| | - Sharon L. Cushing
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto
- Archie’s Cochlear Implant Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
- Department of Otolaryngology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Karoui C, Strelnikov K, Payoux P, Salabert AS, James CJ, Deguine O, Barone P, Marx M. Auditory cortical plasticity after cochlear implantation in asymmetric hearing loss is related to spatial hearing: a PET H215O study. Cereb Cortex 2023; 33:2229-2244. [PMID: 35640270 PMCID: PMC9977387 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
In asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), the normal pattern of contralateral hemispheric dominance for monaural stimulation is modified, with a shift towards the hemisphere ipsilateral to the better ear. The extent of this shift has been shown to relate to sound localization deficits. In this study, we examined whether cochlear implantation to treat postlingual AHL can restore the normal functional pattern of auditory cortical activity and whether this relates to improved sound localization. The auditory cortical activity was found to be lower in the AHL cochlear implanted (AHL-CI) participants. A cortical asymmetry index was calculated and showed that a normal contralateral dominance was restored in the AHL-CI patients for the nonimplanted ear, but not for the ear with the cochlear implant. It was found that the contralateral dominance for the nonimplanted ear strongly correlated with sound localization performance (rho = 0.8, P < 0.05). We conclude that the reorganization of binaural mechanisms in AHL-CI subjects reverses the abnormal lateralization pattern induced by the deafness, and that this leads to improved spatial hearing. Our results suggest that cochlear implantation enables the reconstruction of the cortical mechanisms of spatial selectivity needed for sound localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadlia Karoui
- UMR 5549, Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France.,Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Kuzma Strelnikov
- UMR 5549, Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France.,Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Payoux
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France.,ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Salabert
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France.,ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Chris J James
- Cochlear France SAS, Toulouse, France.,Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et Oto-Neurologie, CHU Toulouse France, Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Olivier Deguine
- UMR 5549, Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France.,Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et Oto-Neurologie, CHU Toulouse France, Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascal Barone
- UMR 5549, Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France.,Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Mathieu Marx
- UMR 5549, Faculté de Médecine Purpan, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France.,Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.,Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et Oto-Neurologie, CHU Toulouse France, Université Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oh SJ, Mavrommatis MA, Fan CJ, DiRisio AC, Villavisanis DF, Berson ER, Schwam ZG, Wanna GB, Cosetti MK. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:131-142. [PMID: 35230924 DOI: 10.1177/01945998221083283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical outcomes of adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implantation. DATA SOURCE An electronic search of Medline and Embase articles. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review was performed with a search strategy developed by a licensed librarian to identify studies of adult patients with SSD who underwent ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Articles were managed in Covidence and evaluated by 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed and data were extracted, including patient demographics, etiology of deafness, duration of deafness, and postoperative change in speech recognition, tinnitus, sound localization, and quality of life (QoL). A meta-analysis was performed, and pooled mean differences were calculated for each outcome of interest via random effects models by each outcome, as well as subgroup analyses by the individual clinical score used. RESULTS Of 2309 studies identified, 185 full texts were evaluated, and 50 were ultimately included involving 674 patients. Speech perception scores in quiet and noise, tinnitus control, sound localization, and QoL all significantly improved after implantation. Pooled outcomes demonstrated score improvements in speech perception (standardized mean difference [SMD], 2.8 [95% CI, 2.16-3.43]), QoL (SMD, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.45-0.91]), sound localization (SMD, -1.13 [95% CI, -1.68 to -0.57]), and tinnitus score reduction (SMD, -1.32 [95% CI, -1.85 to -0.80]). CONCLUSIONS Cochlear implantation in adults with SSD results in significant improvements in speech perception, tinnitus control, sound localization, and QoL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Oh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maria A Mavrommatis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Caleb J Fan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aislyn C DiRisio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dillan F Villavisanis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elisa R Berson
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zachary G Schwam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - George B Wanna
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maura K Cosetti
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Seebacher J, Franke-Trieger A, Weichbold V, Galvan O, Schmutzhard J, Zorowka P, Stephan K. Sound localisation of low- and high-frequency sounds in cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Int J Audiol 2023; 62:71-78. [PMID: 35103553 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2030496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Localisation of low- and high-frequency sounds in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users was investigated using noise stimuli designed to mitigate monaural localisation cues. DESIGN Within subject design. Sound source localisation was tested in the horizontal plane using an array of seven loudspeakers along the azimuthal angle span from -90° to +90°. Stimuli were broadband noise and high- and low-frequency noise. STUDY SAMPLE Twelve adult subjects with single-sided deafness participated in the study. All had normal hearing in the healthy ear and were supplied with a cochlear implant (CI) in their deaf ear. RESULTS With broadband noise, the mean angular localisation error was 39° in aided condition as compared to a median angular error of 83.6° when the speech processor was not worn. For high-frequency noise, the median angular error was 30° and for low-frequency noise, it was 46° in the CI-aided condition. CONCLUSIONS Single-sided deaf CI users show the best sound localisation for high-frequency sounds. This supports the view that interaural level differences are dominant for sound localisation in these listeners. Nonetheless, a limited ability to localise low-frequency sounds was observed, which may be based on the supportive perception of interaural time differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Seebacher
- Department for Hearing, Speech and Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - A Franke-Trieger
- Saxonian Cochlear Implant Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - V Weichbold
- Department for Hearing, Speech and Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - O Galvan
- Department for Hearing, Speech and Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - J Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - P Zorowka
- Department for Hearing, Speech and Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - K Stephan
- Department for Hearing, Speech and Voice Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners. Ear Hear 2023; 44:77-91. [PMID: 35733275 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Talker sex and spatial cues can facilitate segregation of competing speech. However, the spectrotemporal degradation associated with cochlear implants (CIs) can limit the benefit of talker sex and spatial cues. Acoustic hearing in the nonimplanted ear can improve access to talker sex cues in CI users. However, it's unclear whether the CI can improve segregation of competing speech when maskers are symmetrically placed around the target (i.e., when spatial cues are available), compared with acoustic hearing alone. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a CI can improve segregation of competing speech by individuals with unilateral hearing loss. DESIGN Speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) for competing speech were measured in 16 normal-hearing (NH) adults and 16 unilaterally deaf CI users. All participants were native speakers of Mandarin Chinese. CI users were divided into two groups according to thresholds in the nonimplanted ear: (1) single-sided deaf (SSD); pure-tone thresholds <25 dB HL at all audiometric frequencies, and (2) Asymmetric hearing loss (AHL; one or more thresholds > 25 dB HL). SRTs were measured for target sentences produced by a male talker in the presence of two masker talkers (different male or female talkers). The target sentence was always presented via loudspeaker directly in front of the listener (0°), and the maskers were either colocated with the target (0°) or spatially separated from the target at ±90°. Three segregation cue conditions were tested to measure masking release (MR) relative to the baseline condition: (1) Talker sex, (2) Spatial, and (3) Talker sex + Spatial. For CI users, SRTs were measured with the CI on or off. RESULTS Binaural MR was significantly better for the NH group than for the AHL or SSD groups ( P < 0.001 in all cases). For the NH group, mean MR was largest with the Talker sex + spatial cues (18.8 dB) and smallest for the Talker sex cues (10.7 dB). In contrast, mean MR for the SSD group was largest with the Talker sex + spatial cues (14.7 dB), and smallest with the Spatial cues (4.8 dB). For the AHL group, mean MR was largest with the Talker sex + spatial cues (7.8 dB) and smallest with the Talker sex (4.8 dB) and the Spatial cues (4.8 dB). MR was significantly better with the CI on than off for both the AHL ( P = 0.014) and SSD groups ( P < 0.001). Across all unilaterally deaf CI users, monaural (acoustic ear alone) and binaural MR were significantly correlated with unaided pure-tone average thresholds in the nonimplanted ear for the Talker sex and Talker sex + spatial conditions ( P < 0.001 in both cases) but not for the Spatial condition. CONCLUSION Although the CI benefitted unilaterally deaf listeners' segregation of competing speech, MR was much poorer than that observed in NH listeners. Different from previous findings with steady noise maskers, the CI benefit for segregation of competing speech from a different talker sex was greater in the SSD group than in the AHL group.
Collapse
|
12
|
Silva VAR, Pauna HF, Lavinsky J, Hyppolito MA, Vianna MF, Leal M, Massuda ET, Hamerschmidt R, Bahmad Jr F, Cal RV, Sampaio ALL, Felix F, Chone CT, Castilho AM. Task force Guideline of Brazilian Society of Otology - hearing loss in children - Part II - Treatment. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 89:190-206. [PMID: 36528468 PMCID: PMC9874354 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide an overview of the main evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hearing loss in children and adolescents aged 0-18 years. METHODS Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on childhood hearing loss were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions. RESULTS The topics were divided into 2 parts: (1) treatment of sensorineural hearing loss: individual hearing aids, bilateral cochlear implants, cochlear implants in young children, unilateral hearing loss, and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder; and (2) treatment of conductive/mixed hearing loss: external/middle ear malformations, ventilation tube insertion, and tympanoplasty in children. CONCLUSIONS In children with hearing loss, in addition to speech therapy, Hearing AIDS (HAs) or implantable systems may be indicated. Even in children with profound hearing loss, both the use of HAs and behavioral assessments while using the device are important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vagner Antonio Rodrigues Silva
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Campinas, SP, Brazil,Corresponding author.
| | - Henrique Furlan Pauna
- Hospital Universitário Cajuru, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Joel Lavinsky
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Departamento de Cirurgia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
- Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Melissa Ferreira Vianna
- Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Mariana Leal
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Departamento de Cirurgia, Recife, PE, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Tanaka Massuda
- Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Rogério Hamerschmidt
- Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Hospital de Clínicas, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Fayez Bahmad Jr
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil,Instituto Brasiliense de Otorrinolaringologia (IBO), Brasília, DF, Brazil
| | - Renato Valério Cal
- Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará (CESUPA), Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Belém, PA, Brazil
| | - André Luiz Lopes Sampaio
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório de Ensino e Pesquisa em Otorrinolaringologia, Brasília, DF, Brazil
| | - Felippe Felix
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF), Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Carlos Takahiro Chone
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Arthur Menino Castilho
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Clinical Assessment and Management of Adult Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness. Ear Hear 2022; 43:1605-1619. [PMID: 35994570 PMCID: PMC9592177 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The indications for cochlear implantation have expanded to include individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss in the impaired ear and normal hearing (NH) in the contralateral ear, known as single-sided deafness (SSD). There are additional considerations for the clinical assessment and management of adult cochlear implant candidates and recipients with SSD as compared to conventional cochlear implant candidates with bilateral moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The present report reviews the current evidence relevant to the assessment and management of adults with SSD. A systematic review was also conducted on published studies that investigated outcomes of cochlear implant use on measures of speech recognition in quiet and noise, sound source localization, tinnitus perception, and quality of life for this patient population. Expert consensus and systematic review of the current literature were combined to provide guidance for the clinical assessment and management of adults with SSD.
Collapse
|
14
|
Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:666-675. [PMID: 35761459 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Bilateral cochlear-implant (BI-CI) users will have a range of interaural insertion-depth mismatch because of different array placement or characteristics. Mismatch will be larger for electrodes located near the apex or outside scala tympani, or for arrays that are a mix of precurved and straight types. BACKGROUND Brainstem superior olivary-complex neurons are exquisitely sensitive to interaural-difference cues for sound localization. Because these neurons rely on interaurally place-of-stimulation-matched inputs, interaural insertion-depth or scalar-location differences for BI-CI users could cause interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch that impairs binaural abilities. METHODS Insertion depths and scalar locations were calculated from temporal-bone computed-tomography scans for 107 BI-CI users (27 Advanced Bionics, 62 Cochlear, 18 MED-EL). RESULTS Median interaural insertion-depth mismatch was 23.4 degrees or 1.3 mm. Mismatch in the estimated clinically relevant range expected to impair binaural processing (>75 degrees or 3 mm) occurred for 13 to 19% of electrode pairs overall, and for at least three electrode pairs for 23 to 37% of subjects. There was a significant three-way interaction between insertion depth, scalar location, and array type. Interaural insertion-depth mismatch was largest for apical electrodes, for electrode pairs in two different scala, and for arrays that were both-precurved. CONCLUSION Average BI-CI interaural insertion-depth mismatch was small; however, large interaural insertion-depth mismatch-with the potential to degrade spatial hearing-occurred frequently enough to warrant attention. For new BICI users, improved surgical techniques to avoid interaural insertion-depth and scalar mismatch are recommended. For existing BI-CI users with interaural insertion-depth mismatch, interaural alignment of clinical frequency tables might reduce negative spatial-hearing consequences.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kay-Rivest E, Irace AL, Golub JS, Svirsky MA. Prevalence of Single-Sided Deafness in the United States. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:1652-1656. [PMID: 34757636 PMCID: PMC9085960 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS The aim of this study was to obtain a reliable estimate of single-sided deafness (SSD) prevalence in the adult U.S. POPULATION METHODS A cross-sectional national epidemiologic study was performed. Participants were included from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Each cohort includes a nationally representative sample of approximately 5,000 noninstitutionalized civilians. Subjects 20 years old and over with audiometric testing were included. SSD was defined as normal hearing (pure-tone average [PTA] of ≤25 dB) in one ear and severe or worse hearing (PTA > 70 dB) in the other, using both three- and four-frequency PTA definition. Prevalence was measured as a raw number (n) and percentage (%) of the sample. Weighted estimates of prevalence were calculated based on the 2019 U.S. population census. RESULTS An estimated 345,064 Americans (estimated prevalence of 0.14%, 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.24) had SSD. SSD was more prevalent in individuals 60 to 79 years of age (estimated 155,917 U.S. adults, prevalence of 0.25%). A higher prevalence of SSD was noted among women compared to men (215,430 U.S. adult women, prevalence of 0.17% vs. 131,726 U.S. adult men, prevalence of 0.11%). Using a three-frequency PTA definition resulted in an estimated prevalence of 0.11%. Finally, 27% of adults with SSD reported having "good" or "excellent" hearing despite their hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of SSD in the United States is estimated at 0.11%-0.14% (271,122 to 345,064 adults), depending on PTA definition used. These individuals could potentially benefit from auditory rehabilitation, including cochlear implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kay-Rivest
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Alexandria L Irace
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Justin S Golub
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sagi E, Azadpour M, Neukam J, Capach NH, Svirsky MA. Reducing interaural tonotopic mismatch preserves binaural unmasking in cochlear implant simulations of single-sided deafness. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 150:2316. [PMID: 34717490 PMCID: PMC8637719 DOI: 10.1121/10.0006446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Binaural unmasking, a key feature of normal binaural hearing, can refer to the improved intelligibility of masked speech by adding masking that facilitates perceived separation of target and masker. A question relevant for cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness (SSD-CI) is whether binaural unmasking can still be achieved if the additional masking is spectrally degraded and shifted. CIs restore some aspects of binaural hearing to these listeners, although binaural unmasking remains limited. Notably, these listeners may experience a mismatch between the frequency information perceived through the CI and that perceived by their normal hearing ear. Employing acoustic simulations of SSD-CI with normal hearing listeners, the present study confirms a previous simulation study that binaural unmasking is severely limited when interaural frequency mismatch between the input frequency range and simulated place of stimulation exceeds 1-2 mm. The present study also shows that binaural unmasking is largely retained when the input frequency range is adjusted to match simulated place of stimulation, even at the expense of removing low-frequency information. This result bears implications for the mechanisms driving the type of binaural unmasking of the present study and for mapping the frequency range of the CI speech processor in SSD-CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elad Sagi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Mahan Azadpour
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Jonathan Neukam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Nicole Hope Capach
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Longino ES, Manzoor NF, Cass ND, Tawfik KO, Bennett ML, O'Malley MR, Haynes DS, Perkins EL. Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Observed Vestibular Schwannoma: A Preliminary Report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 167:149-154. [PMID: 34546801 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211045903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Over the last decade there has been a trend toward observation for small nongrowing vestibular schwannoma (VS). Even without tumor growth, patients commonly experience ipsilateral hearing decline, and hearing rehabilitation remains challenging. This study analyzes hearing and speech performance outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) in observed VS. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. METHODS Chart review was used to include patients with observed VS who had undergone ipsilateral CI, pre- and postimplantation audiometry, and speech performance. Tumor size pre- and postimplantation was measured with volumetric analysis. RESULTS Seven patients with ipsilateral VS and CI were identified. Preimplantation tumor volume was 0.11 to 1.02 cm3. Five subjects were implanted with a straight electrode and two with a perimodiolar electrode. The average preimplant pure tone average was 91.3 dB (range, 80-117 dB) and 61.2 dB (range, 12-118 dB) for the implanted and nonimplanted ears, respectively. In all subjects with at least 1 year of listening experience (n = 6), consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores improved at 6 months and 1 year in the CI-alone and bimodal listening conditions. AzBio scores in quiet also improved at 6 months and 1 year. Of subjects with serial pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, volumetric analysis demonstrated no tumor growth. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate that CI is a successful option for subjects with small nongrowing VS. All subjects had improved performance postimplantation. VS may continue to be observed with serial magnetic resonance imaging given increasing conditionality among CI manufacturers and ability to assess cerebellopontine angle extension despite implant artifact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Longino
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nauman F Manzoor
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nathan D Cass
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kareem O Tawfik
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Marc L Bennett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew R O'Malley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David S Haynes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Perkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Selleck AM, Dillon M, Perkins E, Brown KD. Cochlear Implantation in the Setting of Menière's Disease After Labyrinthectomy: A Meta-Analysis. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e973-e979. [PMID: 34049331 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Characterize the speech recognition and sound source localization of patients with unilateral Menière's disease who undergo labyrinthectomy for vertigo control with simultaneous or sequential cochlear implantation. DATABASES REVIEWED PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. METHODS The search was performed on May 6, 2020. The keywords utilized included: "Menière's disease AND cochlear implant;" "cochlear implant AND single sided deafness;" "cochlear implant AND vestibular;" and "labyrinthectomy AND cochlear implant." Manuscripts published in English with a publication date after 1995 that assessed adult subjects (≥18 years of age) were included for review. Subjects must have been diagnosed with Menière's disease unilaterally and underwent labyrinthectomy with simultaneous or sequential cochlear implantation. Reported outcomes with cochlear implant (CI) use included speech recognition as measured with the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word test and/or sound source localization reported in root-mean squared (RMS) error. The method of data collection and study type were recorded to assess level of evidence. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS Data from 14 CI recipients met the criteria for inclusion. Word recognition comparisons between the preoperative interval and a postactivation interval demonstrated a significant improvement with the CI (p = 0.014), with an average improvement of 23% (range -16 to 50%). Sound source localization postoperatively with the CI demonstrated an average RMS error of 26° (SD 6.8, range 18.7-43.1°) compared to the 42° (SD 19.1, range 18-85°) in the preoperative or CI off condition, these two conditions were not statistically different (p = 0.148). CONCLUSION Cochlear implantation and labyrinthectomy in adult patients with Menière's disease can support improvements in speech recognition and sound source localization for some CI users, though observed performance may be poorer than traditional CI candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Morgan Selleck
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Margaret Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Elizabeth Perkins
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Müller V, Lang-Roth R. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2021; 64:3343-3356. [PMID: 34310192 DOI: 10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the susceptibility to energetic and informational masking in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) with one normal-hearing (NH) ear and a cochlear implant (CI) in the contralateral ear, understand the effect on speech recognition when spatially separating noise and speech maskers, and investigate the influence of the CI in situations with energetic and informational masking. Method Speech recognition was measured in the presence of either a modulated speech-shaped noise or one of two competing speech maskers in 11 SSD-CI listeners. The speech maskers were manipulated with respect to fundamental frequency to consider the effect of different voices. Measurements were conducted in the unaided (NH) and aided (NHCI) conditions. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was calculated for each masker type and both listening conditions (NH and NHCI) by subtracting scores of the colocated target and masker condition (S0N0) from the spatially separated target and masker conditions (S0N≠0). Results Speech recognition was highly variable depending on the type of masker. SRM occurred in the unaided (NH) and aided (NHCI) conditions when the speech masker had the same gender as the target talker. Adding the CI improved speech recognition when this speech masker was ipsilateral to the NH ear. Conclusions The amount of informational masking is substantial in SSD-CI listeners with both colocated and spatially separated target and masker signals. The contribution of SRM to better speech recognition largely depends on the masker and is considerable when no differences in voices between the target and the competing talker occur. There is only a slight improvement in speech recognition by adding the CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Müller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Ruth Lang-Roth
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pastore MT, Natale SJ, Clayton C, Dorman MF, Yost WA, Zhou Y. Effects of Head Movements on Sound-Source Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Patients With Their Cochlear Implant On Versus Off. Ear Hear 2021; 41:1660-1674. [PMID: 33136640 PMCID: PMC7772279 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated the ability of single-sided deaf listeners implanted with a cochlear implant (SSD-CI) to (1) determine the front-back and left-right location of sound sources presented from loudspeakers surrounding the listener and (2) use small head rotations to further improve their localization performance. The resulting behavioral data were used for further analyses investigating the value of so-called "monaural" spectral shape cues for front-back sound source localization. DESIGN Eight SSD-CI patients were tested with their cochlear implant (CI) on and off. Eight normal-hearing (NH) listeners, with one ear plugged during the experiment, and another group of eight NH listeners, with neither ear plugged, were also tested. Gaussian noises of 3-sec duration were band-pass filtered to 2-8 kHz and presented from 1 of 6 loudspeakers surrounding the listener, spaced 60° apart. Perceived sound source localization was tested under conditions where the patients faced forward with the head stationary, and under conditions where they rotated their heads between (Equation is included in full-text article.). RESULTS (1) Under stationary listener conditions, unilaterally-plugged NH listeners and SSD-CI listeners (with their CIs both on and off) were nearly at chance in determining the front-back location of high-frequency sound sources. (2) Allowing rotational head movements improved performance in both the front-back and left-right dimensions for all listeners. (3) For SSD-CI patients with their CI turned off, head rotations substantially reduced front-back reversals, and the combination of turning on the CI with head rotations led to near-perfect resolution of front-back sound source location. (4) Turning on the CI also improved left-right localization performance. (5) As expected, NH listeners with both ears unplugged localized to the correct front-back and left-right hemifields both with and without head movements. CONCLUSIONS Although SSD-CI listeners demonstrate a relatively poor ability to distinguish the front-back location of sound sources when their head is stationary, their performance is substantially improved with head movements. Most of this improvement occurs when the CI is off, suggesting that the NH ear does most of the "work" in this regard, though some additional gain is introduced with turning the CI on. During head turns, these listeners appear to primarily rely on comparing changes in head position to changes in monaural level cues produced by the direction-dependent attenuation of high-frequency sounds that result from acoustic head shadowing. In this way, SSD-CI listeners overcome limitations to the reliability of monaural spectral and level cues under stationary conditions. SSD-CI listeners may have learned, through chronic monaural experience before CI implantation, or with the relatively impoverished spatial cues provided by their CI-implanted ear, to exploit the monaural level cue. Unilaterally-plugged NH listeners were also able to use this cue during the experiment to realize approximately the same magnitude of benefit from head turns just minutes after plugging, though their performance was less accurate than that of the SSD-CI listeners, both with and without their CI turned on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Torben Pastore
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Sound-Localization Behavior With Multiple Concurrent Sources. Ear Hear 2021; 43:206-219. [PMID: 34320529 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES For listeners with one deaf ear and the other ear with normal/near-normal hearing (single-sided deafness [SSD]) or moderate hearing loss (asymmetric hearing loss), cochlear implants (CIs) can improve speech understanding in noise and sound-source localization. Previous SSD-CI localization studies have used a single source with artificial sounds such as clicks or random noise. While this approach provides insights regarding the auditory cues that facilitate localization, it does not capture the complex nature of localization behavior in real-world environments. This study examined SSD-CI sound localization in a complex scenario where a target sound was added to or removed from a mixture of other environmental sounds, while tracking head movements to assess behavioral strategy. DESIGN Eleven CI users with normal hearing or moderate hearing loss in the contralateral ear completed a sound-localization task in monaural (CI-OFF) and bilateral (CI-ON) configurations. Ten of the listeners were also tested before CI activation to examine longitudinal effects. Two-second environmental sound samples, looped to create 4- or 10-sec trials, were presented in a spherical array of 26 loudspeakers encompassing ±144° azimuth and ±30° elevation at a 1-m radius. The target sound was presented alone (localize task) or concurrently with one or three additional sources presented to different loudspeakers, with the target cued by being added to (Add) or removed from (Rem) the mixture after 6 sec. A head-mounted tracker recorded movements in six dimensions (three for location, three for orientation). Mixed-model regression was used to examine target sound-identification accuracy, localization accuracy, and head movement. Angular and translational head movements were analyzed both before and after the target was switched on or off. RESULTS Listeners showed improved localization accuracy in the CI-ON configuration, but there was no interaction with test condition and no effect of the CI on sound-identification performance. Although high-frequency hearing loss in the unimplanted ear reduced localization accuracy and sound-identification performance, the magnitude of the CI localization benefit was independent of hearing loss. The CI reduced the magnitude of gross head movements used during the task in the azimuthal rotation and translational dimensions, both while the target sound was present (in all conditions) and during the anticipatory period before the target was switched on (in the Add condition). There was no change in pre- versus post-activation CI-OFF performance. CONCLUSIONS These results extend previous findings, demonstrating a CI localization benefit in a complex listening scenario that includes environmental and behavioral elements encountered in everyday listening conditions. The CI also reduced the magnitude of gross head movements used to perform the task. This was the case even before the target sound was added to the mixture. This suggests that a CI can reduce the need for physical movement both in anticipation of an upcoming sound event and while actively localizing the target sound. Overall, these results show that for SSD listeners, a CI can improve localization in a complex sound environment and reduce the amount of physical movement used.
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cochlear implants (CIs) restore some spatial advantages for speech understanding in noise to individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD). In addition to a head-shadow advantage when the CI ear has a better signal-to-noise ratio, a CI can also provide a binaural advantage in certain situations, facilitating the perceptual separation of spatially separated concurrent voices. While some bilateral-CI listeners show a similar binaural advantage, bilateral-CI listeners with relatively large asymmetries in monaural speech understanding can instead experience contralateral speech interference. Based on the interference previously observed for asymmetric bilateral-CI listeners, this study tested the hypothesis that in a multiple-talker situation, the acoustic ear would interfere with rather than improve CI speech understanding for SSD-CI listeners. DESIGN Experiment 1 measured CI-ear speech understanding in the presence of competing speech or noise for 13 SSD-CI listeners. Target speech from the closed-set coordinate response-measure corpus was presented to the CI ear along with one same-gender competing talker or stationary noise at target-to-masker ratios between -8 and 20 dB. The acoustic ear was presented with silence (monaural condition) or with a copy of the competing speech or noise (bilateral condition). Experiment 2 tested a subset of 6 listeners in the reverse configuration for which SSD-CI listeners have previously shown a binaural benefit (target and competing speech presented to the acoustic ear; silence or competing speech presented to the CI ear). Experiment 3 examined the possible influence of a methodological difference between experiments 1 and 2: whether the competing talker spoke keywords that were inside or outside the response set. For each experiment, the data were analyzed using repeated-measures logistic regression. For experiment 1, a correlation analysis compared the difference between bilateral and monaural speech-understanding scores to several listener-specific factors: speech understanding in the CI ear, preimplantation duration of deafness, duration of CI experience, ear of deafness (left/right), acoustic-ear audiometric thresholds, and listener age. RESULTS In experiment 1, presenting a copy of the competing speech to the acoustic ear reduced CI speech-understanding scores for target-to-masker ratios ≥4 dB. This interference effect was limited to competing-speech conditions and was not observed for a noise masker. There was dramatic intersubject variability in the magnitude of the interference (range: 1 to 43 rationalized arcsine units), which was found to be significantly correlated with listener age. The interference effect contrasted sharply with the reverse configuration (experiment 2), whereby presenting a copy of the competing speech to the contralateral CI ear significantly improved performance relative to monaural acoustic-ear performance. Keyword condition (experiment 3) did not influence the observed pattern of interference. CONCLUSIONS Most SSD-CI listeners experienced interference when they attended to the CI ear and competing speech was added to the acoustic ear, although there was a large amount of intersubject variability in the magnitude of the effect, with older listeners particularly susceptible to interference. While further research is needed to investigate these effects under free-field listening conditions, these results suggest that for certain spatial configurations in a multiple-talker situation, contralateral speech interference could reduce the benefit that an SSD-CI otherwise provides.
Collapse
|
23
|
Sheffield SW, Goupell MJ, Spencer NJ, Stakhovskaya OA, Bernstein JGW. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit. Ear Hear 2021; 41:576-590. [PMID: 31436754 PMCID: PMC7028504 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Single-sided deafness cochlear-implant (SSD-CI) listeners and bilateral cochlear-implant (BI-CI) listeners gain near-normal levels of head-shadow benefit but limited binaural benefits. One possible reason for these limited binaural benefits is that cochlear places of stimulation tend to be mismatched between the ears. SSD-CI and BI-CI patients might benefit from a binaural fitting that reallocates frequencies to reduce interaural place mismatch. However, this approach could reduce monaural speech recognition and head-shadow benefit by excluding low- or high-frequency information from one ear. This study examined how much frequency information can be excluded from a CI signal in the poorer-hearing ear without reducing head-shadow benefits and how these outcomes are influenced by interaural asymmetry in monaural speech recognition. DESIGN Speech-recognition thresholds for sentences in speech-shaped noise were measured for 6 adult SSD-CI listeners, 12 BI-CI listeners, and 9 normal-hearing listeners presented with vocoder simulations. Stimuli were presented using nonindividualized in-the-ear or behind-the-ear head-related impulse-response simulations with speech presented from a 70° azimuth (poorer-hearing side) and noise from 70° (better-hearing side), thereby yielding a better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the poorer-hearing ear. Head-shadow benefit was computed as the improvement in bilateral speech-recognition thresholds gained from enabling the CI in the poorer-hearing, better-SNR ear. High- or low-pass filtering was systematically applied to the head-related impulse-response-filtered stimuli presented to the poorer-hearing ear. For the SSD-CI listeners and SSD-vocoder simulations, only high-pass filtering was applied, because the CI frequency allocation would never need to be adjusted downward to frequency-match the ears. For the BI-CI listeners and BI-vocoder simulations, both low and high pass filtering were applied. The normal-hearing listeners were tested with two levels of performance to examine the effect of interaural asymmetry in monaural speech recognition (vocoder synthesis-filter slopes: 5 or 20 dB/octave). RESULTS Mean head-shadow benefit was smaller for the SSD-CI listeners (~7 dB) than for the BI-CI listeners (~14 dB). For SSD-CI listeners, frequencies <1236 Hz could be excluded; for BI-CI listeners, frequencies <886 or >3814 Hz could be excluded from the poorer-hearing ear without reducing head-shadow benefit. Bilateral performance showed greater immunity to filtering than monaural performance, with gradual changes in performance as a function of filter cutoff. Real and vocoder-simulated CI users with larger interaural asymmetry in monaural performance had less head-shadow benefit. CONCLUSIONS The "exclusion frequency" ranges that could be removed without diminishing head-shadow benefit are interpreted in terms of low importance in the speech intelligibility index and a small head-shadow magnitude at low frequencies. Although groups and individuals with greater performance asymmetry gained less head-shadow benefit, the magnitudes of these factors did not predict the exclusion frequency range. Overall, these data suggest that for many SSD-CI and BI-CI listeners, the frequency allocation for the poorer-ear CI can be shifted substantially without sacrificing head-shadow benefit, at least for energetic maskers. Considering the two ears together as a single system may allow greater flexibility in discarding redundant frequency content from a CI in one ear when considering bilateral programming solutions aimed at reducing interaural frequency mismatch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sterling W. Sheffield
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Matthew J. Goupell
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | | | - Olga A. Stakhovskaya
- National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD USA
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Joshua G. W. Bernstein
- National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Burg EA, Thakkar T, Fields T, Misurelli SM, Kuchinsky SE, Roche J, Lee DJ, Litovsky RY. Systematic Comparison of Trial Exclusion Criteria for Pupillometry Data Analysis in Individuals With Single-Sided Deafness and Normal Hearing. Trends Hear 2021; 25:23312165211013256. [PMID: 34024219 PMCID: PMC8150669 DOI: 10.1177/23312165211013256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The measurement of pupil dilation has become a common way to assess listening effort. Pupillometry data are subject to artifacts, requiring highly contaminated data to be discarded from analysis. It is unknown how trial exclusion criteria impact experimental results. The present study examined the effect of a common exclusion criterion, percentage of blinks, on speech intelligibility and pupil dilation measures in 9 participants with single-sided deafness (SSD) and 20 participants with normal hearing. Participants listened to and repeated sentences in quiet or with speech maskers. Pupillometry trials were processed using three levels of blink exclusion criteria: 15%, 30%, and 45%. These percentages reflect a threshold for missing data points in a trial, where trials that exceed the threshold are excluded from analysis. Results indicated that pupil dilation was significantly greater and intelligibility was significantly lower in the masker compared with the quiet condition for both groups. Across-group comparisons revealed that speech intelligibility in the SSD group decreased significantly more than the normal hearing group from quiet to masker conditions, but the change in pupil dilation was similar for both groups. There was no effect of blink criteria on speech intelligibility or pupil dilation results for either group. However, the total percentage of blinks in the masker condition was significantly greater than in the quiet condition for the SSD group, which is consistent with previous studies that have found a relationship between blinking and task difficulty. This association should be carefully considered in future experiments using pupillometry to gauge listening effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burg
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Tanvi Thakkar
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Taylor Fields
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Sara M Misurelli
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.,Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Stefanie E Kuchinsky
- Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Joseph Roche
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Daniel J Lee
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Ruth Y Litovsky
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.,Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe our experience with adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for treatment of single-sided deafness (SSD). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Fifty-three adults with SSD. INTERVENTIONS Unilateral CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Speech perception testing in quiet and noise, tinnitus suppression, and device usage from datalogs. RESULTS The mean age at CI was 53.2 years (SD 11.9). The mean duration of deafness was 4.0 years (SD 7.8). The most common etiology was idiopathic sudden SNHL (50%). Word recognition improved from 8.7% (SD 15) preoperatively to 61.8% (SD 20) at a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (SD 1.8) (p < 0.0001). Adaptive speech recognition testing in the "binaural with CI" condition (speech directed toward the front and noise toward the normal hearing ear) revealed a significant improvement by 2.6-dB SNR compared to the preoperative unaided condition (p = 0.0002) and by 3.6-dB SNR compared to when a device to route sound to the contralateral side was used (p < 0.0001). Tinnitus suppression was reported to be complete in 23 patients (43%) and improved in 20 patients (38%) while the device was on. The addition of the CI did not lead to a decrement in hearing performance in any spatial configuration. Device usage averaged 8.7 (SD 3.7) hours/day. CONCLUSIONS Cochlear implantation in adult SSD patients can suppress tinnitus and achieve speech perception outcomes comparable with CI in conventional candidates. Modest improvements in spatial hearing were also observed and primarily attributable to the head shadow effect. Careful patient selection and counseling regarding potential benefits are important to optimize outcomes.
Collapse
|
26
|
Prospective Multicentric Follow-up Study of Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness: Tinnitus and Audiological Outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2021; 41:458-466. [PMID: 32176124 PMCID: PMC7208276 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the audiological and tinnitus outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in adults with single-sided deafness (SSD) and tinnitus. Study Design: Multicentered prospective, non-randomized intervention study. Setting: Six French CI centers. Patients: Twenty-six patients with SSD and incapacitating tinnitus (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI] >58) underwent cochlear implantation. Interventions: First, CIs delivered only masking white noise stimulation for 1 month and then standard CI stimulation. Main Outcome Measures: Before and after CI surgery, patients completed the THI, Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (TRQ), Subjective Tinnitus Severity Scale (STSS), and two visual analogue scales quantifying tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Speech perception in spatialized noise was tested at 13 months. Results: The first month of white noise stimulation triggered a significant improvement in THI scores (72 ± 9 to 55 ± 20, p < 0.05). No change was observed for the other measures. After 1 year of standard CI stimulation, 23 patients (92%) reported a significant improvement in tinnitus. This improvement started 1 to 2 months after CI and exceeded 40% improvement for 14 patients (54%). Average speech-in-noise perception after 1 year significantly improved for the 23 patients who completed these measures. Conclusions: CI is efficacious to reduce the handicap of patient with SSD and incapacitating tinnitus, leading to a decrease in reported tinnitus and partial restoration of binaural hearing abilities.
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee HJ, Smieja D, Polonenko MJ, Cushing SL, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Consistent and chronic cochlear implant use partially reverses cortical effects of single sided deafness in children. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21526. [PMID: 33298987 PMCID: PMC7726152 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78371-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Potentially neuroprotective effects of CI use were studied in 22 children with single sided deafness (SSD). Auditory-evoked EEG confirmed strengthened representation of the intact ear in the ipsilateral auditory cortex at initial CI activation in children with early-onset SSD (n = 15) and late-onset SSD occurring suddenly in later childhood/adolescence (n = 7). In early-onset SSD, representation of the hearing ear decreased with chronic CI experience and expected lateralization to the contralateral auditory cortex from the CI increased with longer daily CI use. In late-onset SSD, abnormally high activity from the intact ear in the ipsilateral cortex reduced, but responses from the deaf ear weakened despite CI use. Results suggest that: (1) cortical reorganization driven by unilateral hearing can occur throughout childhood; (2) chronic and consistent CI use can partially reverse these effects; and (3) CI use may not protect children with late-onset SSD from ongoing deterioration of pathways from the deaf ear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo-Jeong Lee
- Archie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Rm 6D08, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Department of Communication Disorders, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Daniel Smieja
- Archie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Rm 6D08, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Department of Communication Disorders, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa Jane Polonenko
- Archie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Rm 6D08, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Department of Communication Disorders, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sharon Lynn Cushing
- Archie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Rm 6D08, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Blake Croll Papsin
- Archie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Rm 6D08, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karen Ann Gordon
- Archie's Cochlear Implant Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Rm 6D08, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada. .,Department of Communication Disorders, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The impact of cochlear implant microphone settings on the binaural hearing of experienced cochlear implant users with single-sided deafness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 278:2067-2077. [PMID: 33141254 PMCID: PMC8131307 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06450-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cochlear implantation has become a well-accepted treatment option for people with single-sided deafness (SSD) and has become a clinical standard in many countries. A cochlear implant (CI) is the only device which restores binaural hearing. The effect of microphone directionality (MD) settings has been investigated in other CI indication groups, but its impact on speech perception in noise has not been established in CI users with SSD. The focus of this investigation was, therefore, to assess binaural hearing effects using different MD settings in CI users with SSD. METHODS Twenty-nine experienced CI users with SSD were recruited to determine speech reception thresholds with varying target and noise sources to define binaural effects (head shadow, squelch, summation, and spatial release from masking), sound localization, and sound quality using the SSQ12 and HISQUI19 questionnaires. Outcome measures included the MD settings "natural", "adaptive", and "omnidirectional". RESULTS The 29 participants involved in the study were divided into two groups: 11 SONNET users and 18 OPUS 2/RONDO users. In both groups, a significant head shadow effect of 7.4-9.2 dB was achieved with the CI. The MD setting "adaptive" provided a significant head shadow effect of 9.2 dB, a squelch effect of 0.9 dB, and spatial release from masking of 7.6 dB in the SONNET group. No significant summation effect could be determined in either group with CI. Outcomes with the omnidirectional setting were not significantly different between groups. For both groups, localization improved significantly when the CI was activated and was best when the omnidirectional setting was used. The groups' sound quality scores did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS Adaptive directional microphone settings improve speech perception and binaural hearing abilities in CI users with SSD. Binaural effect measures are valuable to quantify the benefit of CI use, especially in this indication group.
Collapse
|
29
|
Development of cortical auditory responses to speech in noise in unilaterally deaf adults following cochlear implantation. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239487. [PMID: 32976532 PMCID: PMC7518575 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with single-sided deafness (SSD), restoration of binaural function via cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve speech understanding in noise. The objective of this study was to investigate changes in behavioral performance and cortical auditory responses following cochlear implantation. Design Prospective longitudinal study. Setting Tertiary referral center. Methods Six adults with SSD were tested before and 12 months post-activation of the CI. Six normal hearing (NH) participants served as experimental controls. Speech understanding in noise was evaluated for various spatial conditions. Cortical auditory evoked potentials were recorded with /ba/ stimuli in quiet and in noise. Global field power and responses at Cz were analyzed. Results Speech understanding in noise significantly improved with the CI when speech was presented to the CI ear and noise to the normal ear (p<0.05), but remained poorer than that of NH controls (p<0.05). N1 peak amplitude measure in noise significantly increased after CI activation (p<0.05), but remained lower than that of NH controls (p<0.05) at 12 months. After 12 months of CI experience, cortical responses in noise became more comparable between groups. Conclusion Binaural restoration in SSD patients via cochlear implantation improved speech performance noise and cortical responses. While behavioral performance and cortical auditory responses improved, SSD-CI outcomes remained poorer than that of NH controls in most cases, suggesting only partial restoration of binaural hearing.
Collapse
|
30
|
Elkins E, Harvey A, Hillyer J, Hazlewood C, Watson S, Parbery-Clark A. Estimating Real-World Performance of Percutaneously Coupled Bone-Conduction Device Users With Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss. Am J Audiol 2020; 29:170-187. [PMID: 32286081 DOI: 10.1044/2019_aja-19-00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The bone-conduction device attached to a percutaneous screw (BCD) is an important treatment option for individuals with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing loss (UHL). Clinicians may use subjective questionnaires and speech-in-noise measures to evaluate BCD use in this patient population; however, the translation of these metrics to real-world aided performance is unclear. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to measure speech-in-noise performance in BCD users with severe-to-profound UHL in a simulated real-world environment, relative to individuals with normal hearing bilaterally; second, to determine if BCD users' subjective reports of aided performance relate to simulated real-world performance. Method A between-subjects design with two groups was conducted with 14 adults with severe-to-profound UHL (BCD group) and 10 age-matched participants with normal hearing bilaterally (control group). Speech-in-noise tests were administered in an eight-speaker R-Space simulating a real-world environment. To further explore speech-in-noise evaluation methods for this population, testing was also completed in a clinically common two-speaker array. The effects of various microphone settings on performance were explored for BCD users. Subjective performance was measured with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; Cox & Alexander, 1995) and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (Gatehouse & Noble, 2004). Statistical analyses to explore relationships between variables included repeated-measures analysis of variance, regression analyses, independent-samples t tests, nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests, and correlations. Results In the simulated real-world environment, BCD group participants struggled with speech-in-noise understanding compared to control group participants. BCD benefit was observed for all microphone settings when speech stimuli were presented to the side with the BCD. When adaptive directional or fixed directional microphone settings were used, a relationship was noted between simulated real-world speech-in-noise performance for speech stimuli presented to the side with the BCD and subjective reports on the Background Noise subscale of the APHAB. Conclusions The Background Noise subscale of the APHAB may help estimate real-world speech-in-noise performance for BCD users with severe-to-profound UHL for signals of interest presented to the implanted side, specifically when adaptive or fixed directional microphone settings are used. This subscale may provide an efficient and accessible alternative to assessing real-world speech-in-noise performance in lieu of less clinically available measurement tools, such as an R-Space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Elkins
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Anne Harvey
- University of California San Francisco Audiology Clinic
| | - Jake Hillyer
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - Chantel Hazlewood
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Stacey Watson
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Alexandra Parbery-Clark
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Snapp HA, Ausili SA. Hearing with One Ear: Consequences and Treatments for Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9041010. [PMID: 32260087 PMCID: PMC7230949 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an increasing global recognition of the negative impact of hearing loss, and its association to many chronic health conditions. The deficits and disabilities associated with profound unilateral hearing loss, however, continue to be under-recognized and lack public awareness. Profound unilateral hearing loss significantly impairs spatial hearing abilities, which is reliant on the complex interaction of monaural and binaural hearing cues. Unilaterally deafened listeners lose access to critical binaural hearing cues. Consequently, this leads to a reduced ability to understand speech in competing noise and to localize sounds. The functional deficits of profound unilateral hearing loss have a substantial impact on socialization, learning and work productivity. In recognition of this, rehabilitative solutions such as the rerouting of signal and hearing implants are on the rise. This review focuses on the latest insights into the deficits of profound unilateral hearing impairment, and current treatment approaches.
Collapse
|
32
|
Williges B, Wesarg T, Jung L, Geven LI, Radeloff A, Jürgens T. Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users. Trends Hear 2020; 23:2331216519858311. [PMID: 31364496 PMCID: PMC6669847 DOI: 10.1177/2331216519858311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study compared spatial speech-in-noise performance in two cochlear implant (CI) patient groups: bimodal listeners, who use a hearing aid contralaterally to support their impaired acoustic hearing, and listeners with contralateral normal hearing, i.e., who were single-sided deaf before implantation. Using a laboratory setting that controls for head movements and that simulates spatial acoustic scenes, speech reception thresholds were measured for frontal speech-in-stationary noise from the front, the left, or the right side. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was then extracted from speech reception thresholds for monaural and binaural listening. SRM was found to be significantly lower in bimodal CI than in CI single-sided deaf listeners. Within each listener group, the SRM extracted from monaural listening did not differ from the SRM extracted from binaural listening. In contrast, a normal-hearing control group showed a significant improvement in SRM when using two ears in comparison to one. Neither CI group showed a binaural summation effect; that is, their performance was not improved by using two devices instead of the best monaural device in each spatial scenario. The results confirm a "listening with the better ear" strategy in the two CI patient groups, where patients benefited from using two ears/devices instead of one by selectively attending to the better one. Which one is the better ear, however, depends on the spatial scenario and on the individual configuration of hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Williges
- 1 Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wesarg
- 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lorenz Jung
- 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Leontien I Geven
- 3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Radeloff
- 3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Tim Jürgens
- 1 Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany.,4 Institute of Acoustics, University of Applied Sciences Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Távora-Vieira D, Acharya A, Rajan GP. What can we learn from adult cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness who became elective non-users? Cochlear Implants Int 2020; 21:220-227. [PMID: 32122282 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1733746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study investigates the incidence of elective cochlear implant (CI) non-use amongst a cohort of adult CI recipients with single-sided deafness (SSD), identifies the causes that led to non-use, and assesses how non-use could be prevented. Methods: All adults with SSD who received a CI between 2008 and 2018 and who became elective CI non-users were included. Elective non-users were defined as CI recipients who decided to stop using their CI or, if explantation was necessary, refused reimplantation. Results: 5/114 (4.4%) adults with SSD who received a CI became elective non-users. The 5 non-users were a mean 44.2 years old (range 33-70 years) at implantation, had a mean duration of deafness of 7.1 years (range 0.5-20 years) at implantation, and used their CI for a mean 11.5 months (range 1.5-60 months) before (fully) discontinuing use. The primary cause of elective non-use was postoperative discouragement due to unrealistic expectations (4 participants) regarding sound perception with the CI or about the greater than expected level of commitment necessary for rehabilitation. Conclusions: Elective non-use among adult CI recipients with single-sided deafness was very rare and could be further prevented by comprehensive counselling to ensure that candidates have realistic expectations about the rehabilitation requirements and the outcomes with the CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.,Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Aanand Acharya
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.,Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Gunesh P Rajan
- Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.,Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery Department, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yost WA, Pastore MT, Dorman MF. Sound source localization is a multisystem process. ACOUSTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2020; 41:113-120. [PMID: 34305431 PMCID: PMC8297655 DOI: 10.1250/ast.41.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A review of data published or presented by the authors from two populations of subjects (normal hearing listeners and patients fit with cochlear implants, CIs) involving research on sound source localization when listeners move is provided. The overall theme of the review is that sound source localization requires an integration of auditory-spatial and head-position cues and is, therefore, a multisystem process. Research with normal hearing listeners includes that related to the Wallach Azimuth Illusion, and additional aspects of sound source localization perception when listeners and sound sources rotate. Research with CI patients involves investigations of sound source localization performance by patients fit with a single CI, bilateral CIs, a CI and a hearing aid (bimodal patients), and single-sided deaf patients with one normal functioning ear and the other ear fit with a CI. Past research involving CI patients who were stationary and more recent data based on CI patients' use of head rotation to localize sound sources is summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A. Yost
- Spatial Hearing Laboratory, Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, PO Box 870102, Tempe, Arizona, 85287, USA
| | - M. Torben Pastore
- Spatial Hearing Laboratory, Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, PO Box 870102, Tempe, Arizona, 85287, USA
| | - Michael F. Dorman
- Cochlear Implant Laboratory, Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, PO Box 870102, Tempe, Arizona, 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dorman MF, Natale SC, Baxter L, Zeitler DM, Carlson ML, Lorens A, Skarzynski H, Peters JPM, Torres JH, Noble JH. Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners. Trends Hear 2020; 24:2331216520920079. [PMID: 32339072 PMCID: PMC7225791 DOI: 10.1177/2331216520920079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Fourteen single-sided deaf listeners fit with an MED-EL cochlear implant (CI) judged the similarity of clean signals presented to their CI and modified signals presented to their normal-hearing ear. The signals to the normal-hearing ear were created by (a) filtering, (b) spectral smearing, (c) changing overall fundamental frequency (F0), (d) F0 contour flattening, (e) changing formant frequencies, (f) altering resonances and ring times to create a metallic sound quality, (g) using a noise vocoder, or (h) using a sine vocoder. The operations could be used singly or in any combination. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 was a complete match to the sound of the CI, the mean match score was 8.8. Over half of the matches were 9.0 or higher. The most common alterations to a clean signal were band-pass or low-pass filtering, spectral peak smearing, and F0 contour flattening. On average, 3.4 operations were used to create a match. Upshifts in formant frequencies were implemented most often for electrode insertion angles less than approximately 500°. A relatively small set of operations can produce signals that approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI. There are large individual differences in the combination of operations needed. The sound files in Supplemental Material approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI for patients fit with 28-mm electrode arrays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F. Dorman
- Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University
| | - Sarah Cook Natale
- Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University
| | - Leslie Baxter
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Mayo Clinic Arizona
| | - Daniel M. Zeitler
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head-Neck Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center
| | - Matthew L. Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Artur Lorens
- World Hearing Centre, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- World Hearing Centre, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jeroen P. M. Peters
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht
| | | | - Jack H. Noble
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ausili SA, Backus B, Agterberg MJH, van Opstal AJ, van Wanrooij MM. Sound Localization in Real-Time Vocoded Cochlear-Implant Simulations With Normal-Hearing Listeners. Trends Hear 2019; 23:2331216519847332. [PMID: 31088265 PMCID: PMC6535744 DOI: 10.1177/2331216519847332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilateral cochlear-implant (CI) users and single-sided deaf listeners with a CI are less effective at localizing sounds than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. This performance gap is due to the degradation of binaural and monaural sound localization cues, caused by a combination of device-related and patient-related issues. In this study, we targeted the device-related issues by measuring sound localization performance of 11 NH listeners, listening to free-field stimuli processed by a real-time CI vocoder. The use of a real-time vocoder is a new approach, which enables testing in a free-field environment. For the NH listening condition, all listeners accurately and precisely localized sounds according to a linear stimulus–response relationship with an optimal gain and a minimal bias both in the azimuth and in the elevation directions. In contrast, when listening with bilateral real-time vocoders, listeners tended to orient either to the left or to the right in azimuth and were unable to determine sound source elevation. When listening with an NH ear and a unilateral vocoder, localization was impoverished on the vocoder side but improved toward the NH side. Localization performance was also reflected by systematic variations in reaction times across listening conditions. We conclude that perturbation of interaural temporal cues, reduction of interaural level cues, and removal of spectral pinna cues by the vocoder impairs sound localization. Listeners seem to ignore cues that were made unreliable by the vocoder, leading to acute reweighting of available localization cues. We discuss how current CI processors prevent CI users from localizing sounds in everyday environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian A Ausili
- 1 Department of Biophysics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn J H Agterberg
- 1 Department of Biophysics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - A John van Opstal
- 1 Department of Biophysics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc M van Wanrooij
- 1 Department of Biophysics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cochlear implantation in adults with single-sided deafness: generic and disease-specific long-term quality of life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 277:695-704. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05737-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
38
|
Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit. Otol Neurotol 2019; 39:e803-e809. [PMID: 30199498 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have great difficulties in listening situations which rely on binaural auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to examine to which extent a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech perception outcomes in various noisy listening environments. Additionally, the ability to use interaural level differences for sound localization and subjective benefit with the CI were assessed. METHODS Ten single-sided deaf patients with CI were tested in different loudspeaker configurations with and without the CI. A multi-source noise field (MSNF) with uncorrelated noise from four different directions was used in addition to a setup with the signal from the CI side and noise from the normal-hearing side (SCINNH, azimuth of ±45 degrees). Ten normal-hearing subjects were used as a control for the setup. Speech understanding was measured by an adaptive sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence Test, OLSA) in stationary speech shaped noise and temporally modulated noise to assess the benefit in each listening situation. Sensitivity to interaural level differences was measured in a lateralization experiment. Furthermore, patients completed the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSS) questionnaire to assess subjective benefit with the CI. RESULTS An overall average benefit in speech reception threshold (SRT) of 1.6 dB (±0.6 dB standard error of the mean [SEM]) was observed in the binaural listening condition (with CI) in all conditions. In the MSNF setup thresholds improved by 0.4 dB (±0.5 dB SEM) and in the SCINNH configuration by 2.7 dB (±0.7 dB SEM). The choice of masking noise effect also had a significant effect on the SRT outcome. The lateralization performance of the SSD users was on a par with the normal hearing group. BBSS scores reflect the overall benefit with the CI apparent in the speech test results. CONCLUSION Patients with single-sided deafness do benefit from a CI in difficult listening environments and are able to localize sound based on interaural level differences. Considering these outcomes, cochlear implantation represents a promising treatment option for patients with single-sided deafness.
Collapse
|
39
|
Banakis Hartl RM, Greene NT, Benichoux V, Dondzillo A, Brown AD, Tollin DJ. Establishing an Animal Model of Single-Sided Deafness in Chinchilla lanigera. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 161:1004-1011. [PMID: 31570054 DOI: 10.1177/0194599819877649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To characterize changes in brainstem neural activity following unilateral deafening in an animal model. (2) To compare brainstem neural activity from unilaterally deafened animals with that of normal-hearing controls. STUDY DESIGN Prospective controlled animal study. SETTING Vivarium and animal research facilities. SUBJECTS AND METHODS The effect of single-sided deafness on brainstem activity was studied in Chinchilla lanigera. Animals were unilaterally deafened via gentamycin injection into the middle ear, which was verified by loss of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). Animals underwent measurement of ABR and local field potential in the inferior colliculus. RESULTS Four animals underwent chemical deafening, with 2 normal-hearing animals as controls. ABRs confirmed unilateral loss of auditory function. Deafened animals demonstrated symmetric local field potential responses that were distinctly different than the contralaterally dominated responses of the inferior colliculus seen in normal-hearing animals. CONCLUSION We successfully developed a model for unilateral deafness to investigate effects of single-sided deafness on brainstem plasticity. This preliminary investigation serves as a foundation for more comprehensive studies that will include cochlear implantation and manipulation of binaural cues, as well as functional behavioral tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee M Banakis Hartl
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Nathaniel T Greene
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Anna Dondzillo
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Andrew D Brown
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Daniel J Tollin
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kurz A, Grubenbecher M, Rak K, Hagen R, Kühn H. The impact of etiology and duration of deafness on speech perception outcomes in SSD patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276:3317-3325. [PMID: 31535291 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05644-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate a cohort of adult single-sided deafness (SSD) patients who received a cochlear implant and to determine the impact of underlying causes of etiology and duration of deafness on outcome STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis SETTING: Tertiary referral centre with a large cochlear implant program SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A demographic description of 55 adult patients implanted between 2009 and 2016. The best available speech perception score in every patient using the Freiburg Numbers, Freiburg Monosyllables and the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser (HSM) sentence test measured at the 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month intervals, and the yearly follow-up appointments were examined. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted on the variables speech test, duration of deafness and etiology. Patients were split into four groups according to their duration of deafness (shorter duration of 10 years or less versus longer duration of more than 10 years) and etiology (inflammatory disease versus other causes). RESULTS The median word reception score for the Monosyllables at 65 dB SPL were 43.75% (IQR: 29.38) and 67.50% (IQR: 25.63) at 80 dB SPL at 1 year following cochlear implantation. The median percentage score correct for the HSM sentence test was 80% (IQR: 62.95). Etiology of the reviewed patient cohort revealed that most frequent causes for deafness were sudden hearing losses and inflammatory etiologies, e.g. otitis media, labyrinthitis, meningitis, cholesteatoma or mumps. The duration of deafness was not significantly associated with poor speech perception outcome. A significant correlation was found for inflammatory diseases and duration of deafness of longer than 10 years. CONCLUSION The etiology and duration of deafness are important factors for the estimated outcome in speech perception in SSD patients. Presented data reveal that an inflammatory disease leading to deafness in combination with a long duration of deafness (10 + years) lead to poorer speech perception outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Kurz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef Schneider Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Marius Grubenbecher
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef Schneider Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Kristen Rak
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef Schneider Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef Schneider Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Heike Kühn
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef Schneider Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cortical auditory responses according to hearing rehabilitation in unilateral hearing loss. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2019; 136:439-445. [PMID: 31477531 DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of rehabilitation systems (CROS: Contralateral Routing of Signal; BAHA: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid; CI: cochlear implant) on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) and auditory performance in unilateral hearing loss. SUBJECTS AND METHOD Twenty-one adults with unilateral hearing loss, using CROS (n=6), BAHA (n=6) or CI (n=9), were included. Seven normal-hearing subjects served as controls. CAEPs were recorded for a (/ba/) speech stimulus; for patients, tests were conducted with and without their auditory rehabilitation. Amplitude and latency of the various CAEP components of the global field power (GFP) were measured, and scalp potential fields were mapped. Behavioral assessment used sentence recognition in noise, with and without spatial cues. RESULTS Only CI induced N1 peak amplitude change (P<0.05). CI and CROS increased polarity inversion amplitude in the contralateral ear, and frontocentral negativity on the scalp potential map. CI improved understanding when speech was presented to the implanted ear and noise to the healthy ear, and vice-versa. CONCLUSION Cochlear implantation had the greatest impact on CAEP morphology and auditory performance. A longitudinal study could analyze progression of cortical reorganization.
Collapse
|
42
|
Benefits of Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: Data From the House Clinic-University of Southern California-University of California, Los Angeles Clinical Trial. Ear Hear 2019; 40:766-781. [DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
43
|
[Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss. German version]. HNO 2019; 65:586-598. [PMID: 27995277 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0294-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rehabilitation of patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) or asymmetric hearing loss can be achieved with conventional (bilateral) contralateral routing of signals ((Bi)CROS) hearing aids ((Bi)CROS-HA, (Bi)CROS), bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHS) or cochlear implants (CI). To date, only small case series have been published on treatment outcomes in SSD patients after CI surgery and there are only a few comparative studies evaluating rehabilitation outcomes. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide evidence of successful treatment of SSD and asymmetric hearing loss with a CI compared to the untreated monaural hearing condition and the BAHS and (Bi)CROS treatment options in a large number of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a single-centre study, 45 patients with SSD and 40 patients with asymmetric hearing loss were treated with a CI after careful evaluation for CI candidacy. Monaural speech comprehension in noise and localisation ability were examined with (Bi)CROS-HA and BAHS devices (on a test rod) both preoperatively and at 12 months after CI switch-on. At the same intervals, subjective evaluation of hearing ability was conducted using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). RESULTS This report presents the first evidence of successful binaural rehabilitation with CI in a relatively large patient cohort and the advantages over (Bi)CROS and BAHS in smaller subgroups, thus confirming the indication for CI treatment. Moreover, patients with long-term acquired deafness (>10 years) show a benefit from the CI comparable to that observed in patients with shorter-term deafness.
Collapse
|
44
|
Liu YW, Cheng X, Chen B, Peng K, Ishiyama A, Fu QJ. Effect of Tinnitus and Duration of Deafness on Sound Localization and Speech Recognition in Noise in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness. Trends Hear 2019; 22:2331216518813802. [PMID: 30509148 PMCID: PMC6291880 DOI: 10.1177/2331216518813802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) often experience poor sound localization, reduced speech understanding in noise, reduced quality of life, and tinnitus. The present study aims to evaluate effects of tinnitus and duration of deafness on sound localization and speech recognition in noise by SSD subjects. Sound localization and speech recognition in noise were measured in 26 SSD and 10 normal-hearing (NH) subjects. Speech was always presented directly in front of the listener. Noise was presented to the deaf ear, in front of the listener, or to the better hearing ear. Tinnitus severity was measured using visual analog scale and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Relative to NH subjects, SSD subjects had significant deficits in sound localization and speech recognition in all listening conditions (p < .001). For SSD subjects, speech recognition in noise was correlated with mean hearing thresholds in the better hearing ear (p < .001) but not in the deaf ear. SSD subjects with tinnitus performed poorer in sound localization and speech recognition in noise than those without tinnitus. Shorter duration of deafness was associated with greater tinnitus and sound localization difficulty. Tinnitus visual analog scale and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory were highly correlated; the degree of tinnitus was negatively correlated with sound localization and speech recognition in noise. Those experiencing noticeable tinnitus may benefit more from cochlear implantation than those without; subjective tinnitus reduction may be correlated with improved sound localization and speech recognition in noise. Subjects with longer duration of deafness demonstrated better sound localization, suggesting long-term compensation for loss of binaural cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang-Wenyi Liu
- 1 Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 NHC Key Laboratory of Hearing Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoting Cheng
- 1 Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 NHC Key Laboratory of Hearing Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bing Chen
- 1 Department of Otology and Skull Base Surgery, Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,2 NHC Key Laboratory of Hearing Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kevin Peng
- 3 House Clinic, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,4 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Akira Ishiyama
- 4 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Qian-Jie Fu
- 4 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wess JM, Bernstein JGW. The Effect of Nonlinear Amplitude Growth on the Speech Perception Benefits Provided by a Single-Sided Vocoder. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2019; 62:745-757. [PMID: 30950730 DOI: 10.1044/2018_jslhr-h-18-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Purpose For listeners with single-sided deafness, a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech understanding by giving the listener access to the ear with the better target-to-masker ratio (TMR; head shadow) or by providing interaural difference cues to facilitate the perceptual separation of concurrent talkers (squelch). CI simulations presented to listeners with normal hearing examined how these benefits could be affected by interaural differences in loudness growth in a speech-on-speech masking task. Method Experiment 1 examined a target-masker spatial configuration where the vocoded ear had a poorer TMR than the nonvocoded ear. Experiment 2 examined the reverse configuration. Generic head-related transfer functions simulated free-field listening. Compression or expansion was applied independently to each vocoder channel (power-law exponents: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 2). Results Compression reduced the benefit provided by the vocoder ear in both experiments. There was some evidence that expansion increased squelch in Experiment 1 but reduced the benefit in Experiment 2 where the vocoder ear provided a combination of head-shadow and squelch benefits. Conclusions The effects of compression and expansion are interpreted in terms of envelope distortion and changes in the vocoded-ear TMR (for head shadow) or changes in perceived target-masker spatial separation (for squelch). The compression parameter is a candidate for clinical optimization to improve single-sided deafness CI outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Wess
- National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
- Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Joshua G W Bernstein
- National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bernstein JGW, Stakhovskaya OA, Schuchman GI, Jensen KK, Goupell MJ. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness. Trends Hear 2019; 22:2331216518765514. [PMID: 29623771 PMCID: PMC5894906 DOI: 10.1177/2331216518765514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Current clinical practice in programming a cochlear implant (CI) for individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD) is to maximize the transmission of speech information via the implant, with the implicit assumption that this will also result in improved spatial-hearing abilities. However, binaural sensitivity is reduced by interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch, a likely occurrence with a standard CI frequency-to-electrode allocation table (FAT). As a step toward reducing interaural mismatch, this study investigated whether a test of interaural-time-difference (ITD) discrimination could be used to estimate the acoustic frequency yielding the best place match for a given CI electrode. ITD-discrimination performance was measured by presenting 300-ms bursts of 100-pulses-per-second electrical pulse trains to a single CI electrode and band-limited pulse trains with variable carrier frequencies to the acoustic ear. Listeners discriminated between two reference intervals (four bursts each with constant ITD) and a moving target interval (four bursts with variable ITD). For 17 out of the 26 electrodes tested across eight listeners, the function describing the relationship between ITD-discrimination performance and carrier frequency had a discernable peak where listeners achieved 70% to 100% performance. On average, this peak occurred 1.15 octaves above the CI manufacturer’s default FAT. ITD discrimination shows promise as a method of estimating the cochlear place of stimulation for a given electrode, thereby providing information to optimize the FAT for SSD-CI listeners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua G W Bernstein
- 1 National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Olga A Stakhovskaya
- 1 National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.,2 Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Gerald I Schuchman
- 1 National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kenneth K Jensen
- 1 National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Goupell
- 2 Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Buss E, Dillon MT, Rooth MA, King ER, Deres EJ, Buchman CA, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD. Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Trends Hear 2019; 22:2331216518771173. [PMID: 29732951 PMCID: PMC5950506 DOI: 10.1177/2331216518771173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A FDA clinical trial was carried out to evaluate the potential benefit of cochlear implant (CI) use for adults with unilateral moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Subjects were 20 adults with moderate-to-profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss and normal or near-normal hearing on the other side. A MED-EL standard electrode was implanted in the impaired ear. Outcome measures included: (a) sound localization on the horizontal plane (11 positions, -90° to 90°), (b) word recognition in quiet with the CI alone, and (c) masked sentence recognition with the target at 0° and the masker at -90°, 0°, or 90°. This battery was completed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after CI activation. Normative data were also collected for 20 age-matched control subjects with normal or near-normal hearing bilaterally. The CI improved localization accuracy and reduced side bias. Word recognition with the CI alone was similar to performance of traditional CI recipients. The CI improved masked sentence recognition when the masker was presented from the front or from the side of normal or near-normal hearing. The binaural benefits observed with the CI increased between the 1- and 3-month intervals but appeared stable thereafter. In contrast to previous reports on localization and speech perception in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, CI benefits were consistently observed across individual subjects, and performance was at asymptote by the 3-month test interval. Cochlear implant settings, consistent CI use, and short duration of deafness could play a role in this result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Buss
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, 2331 University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, 2331 University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Meredith A Rooth
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, 2331 University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - English R King
- 2 Department of Audiology, 2334 UNC Health Care , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ellen J Deres
- 2 Department of Audiology, 2334 UNC Health Care , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Craig A Buchman
- 3 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, 12275 Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Harold C Pillsbury
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, 2331 University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kevin D Brown
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, 2331 University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zeitler DM, Sladen DP, DeJong MD, Torres JH, Dorman MF, Carlson ML. Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness in children and adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 118:128-133. [PMID: 30623849 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate outcomes in pediatric and adolescent patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) undergoing cochlear implantation. METHODS A retrospective cohort design at two tertiary level academic cochlear implant centers. The subjects included nine children ages 1.5 to 15 years-old with single-sided deafness (SSD) who had undergone cochlear implantation in the affected ear. Objective outcome measures included were speech reception testing in quiet and noise, bimodal speech reception threshold testing in noise, tinnitus suppression, and device usage. RESULTS Nine pediatric and adolescent patients with SSD were implanted between 2011 and 2017. The median age at implantation was 8.9 years (range, 1.5-15.1) and the children had a median duration of deafness 2.9 years (range, 0.8-9.5). There was variability in testing measures due to patient age. Median pre-operative aided word recognition scores on the affected side were <30% regardless of the testing paradigm used. Six patients had pre-operative word testing (4 CNC, median score 25%; 2 MLNT, 8% and 17%). Four patients had pre-operative sentence testing (3 AzBio, median score 44%; 1 HINT-C, 57%). Median post-implantation follow-up interval was 12.3 months (range, 3-27.6 months). Six subjects had post-operative word recognition testing (CNC median, 70%; MLNT 50%, 92%) with a median improvement of 45.5% points. Five subjects had post-operative sentence testing (AzBio, median 82%; HINT, median 76%), with a median improvement of 40.5% points. Eight patients are full time users of their device. Tinnitus and bimodal speech reception thresholds in noise were improved. CONCLUSION Pediatric subjects with SSD benefit substantially from cochlear implantation. Objective speech outcome measures are improved in both quiet and noise, and bimodal speech reception thresholds in noise are greatly improved. There is a low rate of device non-use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Zeitler
- Listen for Life Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
| | - Douglas P Sladen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Melissa D DeJong
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jennifer H Torres
- Denver Ear Associates, 401 W. Hampden Place #240, Englewood, CO, 80110, USA
| | - Michael F Dorman
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, PO Box 870102, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Matthew L Carlson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zeitler DM, Dorman MF. Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: A New Treatment Paradigm. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80:178-186. [PMID: 30931226 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Unilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), also known as single sided deafness (SSD), is a problem that affects both children and adults, and can have severe and detrimental effects on multiple aspects of life including music appreciation, speech understanding in noise, speech and language acquisition, performance in the classroom and/or the workplace, and quality of life. Additionally, the loss of binaural hearing in SSD patients affects those processes that rely on two functional ears including sound localization, binaural squelch and summation, and the head shadow effect. Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in cochlear implantation for SSD to restore binaural hearing. Early data are promising that cochlear implantation for SSD can help to restore binaural functionality, improve quality of life, and may faciliate reversal of neuroplasticity related to auditory deprivation in the pediatric population. Additionally, this new patient population has allowed researchers the opportunity to investigate the age-old question "what does a cochlear implant (CI) sound like?."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Zeitler
- Listen for Life Center, Department of Otolaryngology/HNS, Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle, Washington, United States.,Department of Otolarygology/HNS, Clinical Faculty, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Michael F Dorman
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lorens A, Kruszyńska M, Obrycka A, Skarzynski PH, Wilson B, Skarzynski H. Binaural advantages in using a cochlear implant for adults with profound unilateral hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol 2019; 139:153-161. [PMID: 30762466 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1535190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies of cochlear implants (CIs) in profound unilateral hearing loss (UHL) patients have demonstrated a restoration of some binaural hearing. AIMS/OBJECTIVES The objective was to evaluate three possible advantages of binaural hearing in CIs adult users with UHL including single-side deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) subgroups. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective study was conducted that included 70 sequentially implanted patients. Subgroups of these subjects included 64 with a postlingual onset of a profound hearing loss on the implanted side and 6 with a prelingual onset of that loss. Three binaural effects - redundancy, head shadow, and squelch - were evaluated. RESULTS Significant differences between the 'CI on' and 'CI off' conditions were found for all three binaural effects for the study group as a whole and for the postlingual subgroup. However, results for the subjects in the prelingual subgroup did not demonstrate any of the binaural advantages. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE Patients with a postlingual onset of a profound hearing loss in one ear and normal hearing or only a moderate loss in the other ear are able to make the effective use of a CI in the profound-loss ear in conjunction with acoustic stimulation of the other ear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artur Lorens
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Anita Obrycka
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Henryk Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department of the Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Blake Wilson
- Departments of Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|