Adaptation and Compensation of Vestibular Responses Following Superior Canal Dehiscence Surgery

Narrowing of Low-Frequency Air-Bone Gap and Its Association with Symptom Resolution Following Superior Canal Dehiscence Repair

OBJECTIVE

Low-frequency air-bone gap (LABG) on pure tone audiometry is an expected clinical finding of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome. We investigate how narrowing of LABG following SCD repairs translates to symptom resolution.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary Care Center.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive SCD repairs at an institution between 2012 and 2022. Pure tone audiometry and symptom questionnaires were administered pre- and post-operatively. The independent variable assessed whether the LABG narrowed (≥5 dB) following surgery. Outcome measures were rates of Overall Symptom Improvement (OSI, net resolution of ≥1 symptom) and Symptom Resolution Score (SRS, % symptoms resolved). We conducted multivariable regression analyses with LABG narrowing as the primary predictor. All models controlled for demographics, bilateral disease, prior ear surgery, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Among total of 217 repairs analyzed, 161 (74%) reached OSI, and mean SRS was 39 (out of 100). LABG narrowing at 250 Hz (65%), 500 Hz (52%), and 1000 Hz (47%) was associated with a 41-point (β 95% confidence interval [CI] 5-77) increase in auditory, 15-point (β 95% CI 1-30) increase in auditory, and 23-point (β 95% CI 2-45) increase in vestibular SRS, respectively. However, LABG narrowing was not significantly associated with the rates of auditory and vestibular OSI at all frequencies assessed.

CONCLUSION

Lack of LABG narrowing following repair was associated with the persistence of a greater proportion of preoperative symptoms but similar likelihood of OSI. This relationship was more prominent for auditory symptoms at 250 to 500 Hz and for vestibular symptoms at 1000 Hz. Additional research is warranted to elucidate the mechanism through which symptoms resolve despite LABG persistence.

Posterior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence with Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Reduction for the Affected Canal at the Video-Head Impulse Test: Considerations to Pathomechanisms

Posterior semicircular canal dehiscence (PSCD) has been demonstrated to result in a third mobile window mechanism (TMWM) in the inner ear similar to superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). Typical clinical and instrumental features of TMWM, including low-frequency conductive hearing loss (CHL), autophony, pulsatile tinnitus, sound/pressure-induced vertigo and enhanced vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, have been widely described in cases with PSCD. Nevertheless, video-head impulse test (vHIT) results have been poorly investigated. Here, we present six patients with PSCD presenting with a clinical scenario consistent with a TMWM and an impaired vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) for the affected canal on vHIT. In two cases, an additional dehiscence between the facial nerve and the horizontal semicircular canal (HSC) was detected, leading to a concurrent VOR impairment for the HSC. While in SSCD, a VOR gain reduction could be ascribed to a spontaneous "auto-plugging" process due to a dural prolapse into the canal, the same pathomechanism is difficult to conceive in PSCD due to a different anatomical position, making a dural herniation less likely. Alternative putative pathomechanisms are discussed, including an endolymphatic flow dissipation during head impulses as already hypothesized in SSCD. The association of symptoms/signs consistent with TMWM and a reduced VOR gain for the posterior canal might address the diagnosis toward PSCD.

Predictors of non-primary auditory and vestibular symptom persistence following surgical repair of superior canal dehiscence syndrome

Objective

Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a plethora of auditory and/or vestibular symptoms associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal. While surgical repair is a reasonable option for patients with significant localizing symptoms, the degree of clinical improvement will vary among patients and poses challenges in outcome prediction. This study aims to assess the relationship between preoperative and postoperative symptoms and identify predictors of symptom persistence following repair.

Study design

Retrospective chart review.

Setting

Tertiary neurotology single-institution care center.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was to determine the proportion of resolved and persistent primary (most bothersome) and non-primary audiologic and vestibular symptoms following SCD repair. Secondary outcomes included comparison of patient, operative and radiologic characteristics between patients with resolved vs. persistent symptoms. Standardized patient questionnaires including 11 auditory and 8 vestibular symptoms were administered to patients at their preoperative and follow-up visits. Patient pre- vs. postoperative survey results, demographic and clinical characteristics, operative characteristics, audiometric data and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds were compared via univariate χ2 and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses between those patients reporting full postoperative resolution of symptoms and persistence of one or more symptoms. Radiologic computed tomography (CT) measurements of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) defect size, location, and laterality were also compared between these two groups.

Results

Of 126 patients (132 ears) included in our study, 119 patients (90.2%) reported postoperative resolution (n = 82, 62.1%) or improvement (n = 37, 28.0%) of primary (most bothersome) symptoms, while 13 patients (9.8%) reported persistence of primary symptoms. The median (interquartile range) and range between surgery and questionnaire completion were 9 (4-28), 1-124 months, respectively. Analyzing all symptoms (primary and non-primary) 69 (52.3%) and 68 (51.1%) patients reported complete postoperative auditory and vestibular symptom resolution, respectively. The most likely persistent symptoms included imbalance (33/65/67, 50.8%), positional dizziness (7/20, 35.0%) and oscillopsia (44/15, 26.7%). Factors associated with persistent auditory symptoms included history of seizures (0% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.023), auditory chief complaint (50.0% vs. 70.5%), higher PTA (mean 19.6 vs. 25.1 dB, p = 0.043) and higher cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds at 1000 Hz (mean 66.5 vs. 71.4, p = 0.033). A migraine diagnosis (14.0% vs. 41.9% p < 0.010), bilateral radiologic SCD (17.5% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.034) and revision cases (0.0% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.002) were associated with persistent vestibular symptoms. Neither SCD defect size nor location were significantly associated with symptom persistence (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Surgical repair for SCDS offers meaningful reduction in the majority of auditory and vestibular symptoms. However, the persistence of certain, mostly non-primary, symptoms and the identification of potential associated factors including migraines, PTA thresholds, cVEMP threshold, bilateral SCD, and revision cases emphasize the importance of individualized patient counseling and management strategies.

[Semicircular canal occlusion]

Semicircular canal occlusion（SCO） is a surgical technique widely used for treating vertigo symptoms. It is primarily aimed at treating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo（BPPV）, Ménière's disease（MD）, labyrinthine fistula, and superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome, among others. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the development, evolution, relevant basic research, and clinical applications of semicircular canal occlusion, especially the application of endoscopic technology in recent years, and explore its practical value in the field of surgical treatment for vertigo.

Transmastoid Surgery for Superior Canal Dehiscence: Prospective Longitudinal Objective and Patient-Reported Audiovestibular Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

We assess symptom control, reversal and stability of objective third-window indicators, and hearing and balance function after transmastoid superior canal dehiscence plugging. To do this, we combine patient self-assessment questionnaires with auditory and vestibular test data collected at a preoperative and multiple postoperative visits.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent transmastoid plugging for superior canal dehiscence from 2012 to 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Plugging of the superior semicircular canal using the transmastoid approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were evaluated preoperatively, 3-month postoperative, and at yearly follow-ups (up to 8 yr postoperative). Self-assessment questionnaires included Autophony Index, Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, and Hearing Handicap Inventory. Objective tests included audiometry, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential, ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, and video head impulse test.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant improvement in Autophony Index and Hearing Handicap Inventory total scores from the preoperative evaluation to 1 year postoperative. Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory total scores also improved but statistically insignificant. Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential amplitudes and low-frequency air-bone gap showed statically significant reversal of the third-window effect preoperative versus 1 year postoperative. Video head impulse test of the superior semicircular canal revealed cases of pathological function preoperative with postoperative recovery. Results were stable over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Superior canal dehiscence repair resolves symptoms of autophony and improves hearing disability. Objective third-window indicators reverse and show long-term stability. Auditory and vestibular function is preserved postoperative, even superior semicircular canal function may be normal. Data suggest that surgical outcomes should not be evaluated until 1 year postoperative.

Impaired Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex on Video Head Impulse Test in Superior Canal Dehiscence: "Spontaneous Plugging" or Endolymphatic Flow Dissipation?

Surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal (SSC) represents an effective procedure to treat disabling symptoms in superior canal dehiscence (SCD), despite resulting in an impaired vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain for the SSC. On the other hand, SSC hypofunction on video head impulse test (vHIT) represents a common finding in patients with SCD exhibiting sound/pressure-induced vertigo, a low-frequency air-bone gap (ABG), and enhanced vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). "Spontaneous canal plugging" has been assumed as the underlying process. Nevertheless, missing/mitigated symptoms and/or near-normal instrumental findings would be expected. An endolymphatic flow dissipation has been recently proposed as an alternative pathomechanism for SSC VOR gain reduction in SCD. We aimed to shed light on this debate by comparing instrumental findings from 46 ears of 44 patients with SCD exhibiting SSC hypofunction with post-operative data from 10 ears of 10 patients with SCD who underwent surgical plugging. While no difference in SSC VOR gain values was found between the two groups (p = 0.199), operated ears developed a posterior canal hypofunction (p = 0.002). Moreover, both ABG values (p = 0.012) and cervical/ocular VEMP amplitudes (p < 0.001) were significantly higher and VEMP thresholds were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in ears with SCD compared to operated ears. According to our data, canal VOR gain reduction in SCD should be considered as an additional sign of a third window mechanism, likely due to an endolymphatic flow dissipation.

Auditory and Vestibular Symptom Improvement With Surgery for Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

(1) To measure the change in auditory and vestibular symptoms following superior canal dehiscence (SCD) surgery, and (2) to determine differences in clinical features and surgical outcomes between superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) patients with primarily auditory or vestibular complaints.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single surgeon series at the tertiary academic medical center from 2002 to 2021.

METHODS

Retrospective review of SCDS patients who underwent surgical repair. (1) Patients were administered a standardized symptom questionnaire at preoperative and follow-up visits, and results were compared with paired statistical testing. (2) Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on either auditory or vestibular chief complaint and differences in demographic, clinical, and outcome variables were examined.

RESULTS

Our study included 113 patients with 118 operated ears. Twenty-seven patients (24%) had radiographic bilateral dehiscence. 10/11 auditory symptoms (91%) and 5/8 vestibular symptoms (63%) solicited on the questionnaire improved significantly with surgery, except for nonpulsatile tinnitus, sense of imbalance, positional dizziness, and oscillopsia. Analyses stratified by chief complaint (auditory vs vestibular) revealed overall similar characteristics and surgical outcomes. Patients with chief vestibular complaints underwent surgery at an earlier age (45.5 vs 53.9 years, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SCD surgery alleviates a wide range of auditory and vestibular symptoms. Overall, we did not find significant differences between patients with chief auditory versus vestibular complaints, and both groups benefited from surgery. Symptoms are not directly linked to third-window physiology and certain vestibular symptoms may be more likely to persist. Bilateral dehiscence may play an important role in persistent symptoms as well.

Case Report: Fremitus Nystagmus in Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

Superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) is a structural bony defect of the roof of the superior semi-circular canal into the middle cranial fossa and is responsible for the creation of a third window, which alters the dynamics of the inner ear. During humming, vibratory waves entering the vestibulum and cochlea are re-routed through the dehiscence, leading to stimulation of the otolithic and ampullary vestibular organs. This is responsible for the torsional-vertical nystagmus known as “fremitus nystagmus”. In this case report, we video-document a rare case of fremitus nystagmus and its resolution after plugging of the superior semi-circular canal.

The resilience of the inner ear-vestibular and audiometric impact of transmastoid semicircular canal plugging

Background

Certain cases of superior semicircular canal dehiscence or benign paroxysmal positional vertigo can be treated by plugging of the affected semicircular canal. However, the extent of the impact on vestibular function and hearing during postoperative follow-up is not known.

Objective

To evaluate the evolution of vestibular function and hearing after plugging of a semicircular canal.

Methods

Six patients underwent testing before and 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months after plugging of the superior or posterior semicircular canal. Testing included caloric irrigation test, video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), cervical and ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) and audiometry.

Results

Initially, ipsilateral caloric response decreased in all patients and vHIT vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain of each ipsilateral semicircular canal decreased in 4/6 patients. In 4/6 patients, postoperative caloric response recovered to > 60% of the preoperative value. In 5/6 patients, vHIT VOR gain was restored to > 85% of the preoperative value for both ipsilateral non-plugged semicircular canals. In the plugged semicircular canal, this gain decreased in 4/5 patients and recovered to > 50% of the preoperative value. Four patients preserved cervical and ocular VEMP responses. Bone conduction hearing deteriorated in 3/6 patients, but recovered within 6 months postoperatively, although one patient had a persistent loss of 15 dB at 8 kHz.

Conclusion

Plugging of a semicircular canal can affect both vestibular function and hearing. After initial deterioration, most patients show recovery during follow-up. However, a vestibular function loss or high-frequency hearing loss can persist. This stresses the importance of adequate counseling of patients considering plugging of a semicircular canal.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10693-5.

Quantitative three-dimensional image analysis of the superior canal after surgical plugging to treat superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Surgical plugging to treat superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) has been proven to impede the effect of the third mobile window, abating cochleovestibular symptoms. Knowledge of superior semicircular canal (SC)-plugging status has been proposed to serve as a guide for adjuvant treatment. Here, we investigated disturbances in the inner ear fluid space following SC plugging using a novel three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction-based method. This approach used a semi-automatic segmentation algorithm and a direct volume rendering method derived from conventional magnetic resonance images. The variable extents of filling defects at the sites of SC plugging and the positional relation of the defect to the ampulla and common crus were identified. The success group exhibited markedly reduced volumes following surgery, whereas the failure group displayed no changes in volume. These results indicate that the success or failure of SC plugging was related to 3D volume changes in the labyrinth fluid signal. Collectively, this study presents individualized SC-plugging statuses using a novel 3D reconstruction-based method and it facilitates future work regarding easy-to-measure 3D volume changes. This current technology also aids in the exploration of pathologic changes in various targets of interest.

Relationship Between Corrective Saccades and Measures of Physical Function in Unilateral and Bilateral Vestibular Loss

OBJECTIVES

Following the loss of vestibular function, some patients functionally improve and are minimally bothered by their loss of peripheral function while others remain more symptomatic and are unable to return to their activities of daily living. To date, the mechanisms for functional improvement remain poorly understood. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association between corrective saccades and measures of handicap, dynamic visual acuity, gait, and falls.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who were diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral vestibular hypofunction and who also completed a baseline vestibular rehabilitation evaluation. A total of 82 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction and 17 patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction were identified. The video head impulse test results for each patient were grouped based on the type of presenting saccades. Specifically, the saccade grouping included the following: (1) covert, (2) overt, or (3) a combination of both types of saccades.

RESULTS

The results show that covert saccades are associated with better performance on measures of dynamic visual acuity, gait, and balance in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Patients exhibiting overt saccades or combination of both covert and overt saccades were more often found to have an abnormal gait speed and be characterized as being at risk for falls using the Dynamic Gait Index. We observed no differences in physical function for those patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction as a function of saccade grouping.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing saccade groups (covert, overt, or combination of both), patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction and covert saccades demonstrated better performance on standard baseline physical therapy measures of dynamic visual acuity and gait and balance. We did not observe any significant associations between saccade group and physical function in patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction; however, additional studies are needed with adequate sample sizes. Our findings may suggest that corrective saccade latency in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction is related to measures of physical function. The extent to which saccade latency has the potential to be a useful target for vestibular rehabilitation is still to be determined and may be promising target to improve functional outcomes.

How Good Are We in Evaluating a Bedside Head Impulse Test?

OBJECTIVES

Clinicians performing a horizontal head impulse test (HIT) are looking for a corrective saccade. The detection of such saccades is a challenge. The aim of this study is to assess an expert's likelihood of detecting corrective saccades in subjects with vestibular hypofunction.

DESIGN

In a prospective cohort observational study at a tertiary referral hospital, we assessed 365 horizontal HITs performed clinically by an expert neurootologist from a convenience sample of seven patients with unilateral or bilateral deficient vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). All HITs were recorded simultaneously by video-oculography, as a gold standard. We evaluated saccades latency and amplitude, head velocity, and gain.

RESULTS

Saccade amplitude was statistically the most significant parameter for saccade detection (p < 0.001).The probability of saccade detection was eight times higher for HIT toward the pathological side (p = 0.029). In addition, an increase in saccade amplitude resulted in an increased probability of detection (odds ratio [OR] 1.77 [1.31 to 2.40] per degree, p < 0.001). The sensitivity to detect a saccade amplitude of 1 degree was 92.9% and specificity 79%. Saccade latency and VOR gain did not significantly influence the probability of the physician identifying a saccade (OR 1.02 [0.94 to 1.11] per 10-msec latency and OR 0.84 [0.60 to 1.17] per 0.1 VOR gain increase).

CONCLUSIONS

The saccade amplitude is the most important factor for accurate saccade detection in clinically performed head impulse tests. Contrary to current knowledge, saccade latency and VOR gain play a minor role in saccade detection.

Association Between Saccule and Semicircular Canal Impairments and Cognitive Performance Among Vestibular Patients

OBJECTIVES

Growing evidence suggests that vestibular function impacts higher-order cognitive ability such as visuospatial processing and executive functioning. Despite evidence demonstrating vestibular functional impairment impacting cognitive performance, it is unknown whether cognitive ability is differentially affected according to the type of vestibular impairment (semicircular canal [SCC] versus saccule) among patients with diagnosed vestibular disease.

DESIGN

Fifty-four patients who presented to an academic neurotologic clinic were recruited into the study. All patients received a specific vestibular diagnosis. Forty-one patients had saccule function measured with the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential, and 43 had SCC function measured using caloric irrigation. Cognitive tests were administered to assess cognitive performance among patients. One hundred twenty-five matched controls were recruited from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging to compare cognitive performance in patients relative to age-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

Using multivariate linear regression analyses, patients with bilaterally absent cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e., bilateral saccular impairments) were found to take longer in completing the Trail-Making test (β = 25.7 sec, 95% confidence interval = 0.3 to 51.6) and to make significantly more errors on the Benton Visual Retention test part-C (β = 4.5 errors, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2 to 7.8). Patients with bilateral SCC impairment were found to make significantly more errors on the Benton Visual Retention test part-C (β = 9.8 errors, 95% CI = 0.2 to 19.4). From case-control analysis, for each SD difference in Trail-Making test part-B time, there was a corresponding 142% increase in odds of having vestibular impairment (odds ratio = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.44 to 4.07).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that bilateral saccule and SCC vestibular impairments may significantly affect various domains of cognitive performance. Notably, the cognitive performance in patients in this study was significantly poorer relative to age-matched healthy adults. Cognitive assessment may be considered in patients with saccule and SCC impairments, and cognitive deficits in vestibular patients may represent an important target for intervention.

Transmastoid Superior Semicircular Canal Plugging: A Prospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcomes of the transmastoid superior semicircular canal plugging in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary, university center.

PATIENTS

Patients with SSCD undergoing transmastoid superior semicircular canal plugging within a 30-month period.

INTERVENTIONS

Transmastoid superior semicircular canal occlusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We documented the surgical technique, pre- and postoperative (3-month review) dizziness handicap inventory scores, average hearing thresholds, low-frequency air-bone gap, six-canal video head-impulse-test responses, improvement of the auditory symptoms and complications.

RESULTS

Out of 30 patients with SSCD, 11 patients (12 ears) were enrolled with an average age 41.17 years (range 32-65 years). Oscillopsia resolved in all patients; DHI score improved from 56.7 (range 22-84) preoperatively to 25.83 (10-46) postoperatively (p = 0.001), while out of the nine patients with troublesome auditory symptoms, five patients noticed an improvement. The average pre- and postoperative hearing thresholds were 15.2 dB (range 3-32.5 dB) and 14.17 dB (range 5-30 dB) (p = 0.73), respectively. The average pre- and postoperative low-frequency air bone gap was 12.3 dB (range 5-20 dB) and 9.4 dB (range 0-20 dB), respectively (p = 0.24) (Table 1). There were no major complications; two patients developed postoperative benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

CONCLUSION

Transmastoid plugging of the superior semicircular canal can safely and significantly improve the vestibular symptoms of the patients with SCDS, as well as the auditory symptoms in a substantial number of patients in a hearing-preservation way.

Video-head impulse test in superior canal dehiscence

BACKGROUND

Superior Canal Dehiscence is classically diagnosed with typical abnormalities on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) and Computed Tomography (CT) scans.

AIM

This paper discusses the utility of the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) in SCD.

METHODS

Data from 11 ears (8 patients) with SCD were retrospectively reviewed. Results from vHIT, VEMPs and CT and when possible, MRI scans were correlated. An audit of 300 vHIT from patients undergoing routine testing for any neurotological complaint was also conducted to look at the incidence of isolated abnormal superior canal function.

RESULTS

82% of patients (9 ears) with SCD showed abnormal vHIT (reduced gain and catch-up saccades) isolated to the affected superior semicircular canal.

CONCLUSION

Correlation of the CT and VEMPs are important in forming a diagnosis of SCD. However, if isolated superior canal vHIT abnormalities are demonstrated, it is suggestive of SCD and such patients should be referred for further investigations.

Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort.

Diagnosing vestibular hypofunction: an update

Unilateral or bilateral vestibular hypofunction presents most commonly with symptoms of dizziness or postural imbalance and affects a large population. However, it is often missed because no quantitative testing of vestibular function is performed, or misdiagnosed due to a lack of standardization of vestibular testing. Therefore, this article reviews the current status of the most frequently used vestibular tests for canal and otolith function. This information can also be used to reach a consensus about the systematic diagnosis of vestibular hypofunction.

Biomechanics of Third Window Syndrome

Third window syndrome describes a set of vestibular and auditory symptoms that arise when a pathological third mobile window is present in the bony labyrinth of the inner ear. The pathological mobile window (or windows) adds to the oval and round windows, disrupting normal auditory and vestibular function by altering biomechanics of the inner ear. The most commonly occurring third window syndrome arises from superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), where a section of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal is absent or thinned (near-dehiscence). The presentation of SSCD syndrome is well characterized by clinical audiological and vestibular tests. In this review, we describe how the third compliant window introduced by a SSCD alters the biomechanics of the inner ear and thereby leads to vestibular and auditory symptoms. Understanding the biomechanical origins of SSCD further provides insight into other third window syndromes and the potential of restoring function or reducing symptoms through surgical repair.

Comparison of three video head impulse test systems for the diagnosis of bilateral vestibulopathy

INTRODUCTION

A horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain (VOR gain) of < 0.6, measured by the video head impulse test (VHIT), is one of the diagnostic criteria for bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) according to the Báràny Society. Several VHIT systems are commercially available, each with different techniques of tracking head and eye movements and different methods of gain calculation. This study compared three different VHIT systems in patients diagnosed with BV.

METHODS

This study comprised 46 BV patients (diagnosed according to the Báràny criteria), tested with three commercial VHIT systems (Interacoustics, Otometrics and Synapsys) in random order. Main outcome parameter was VOR gain as calculated by the system, and the agreement on BV diagnosis (VOR gain < 0.6) between the VHIT systems. Peak head velocities, the order effect and covert saccades were analysed separately, to determine whether these parameters could have influenced differences in outcome between VHIT systems.

RESULTS

VOR gain in the Synapsys system differed significantly from VOR gain in the other two systems [F(1.256, 33.916) = 35.681, p < 0.000]. The VHIT systems agreed in 83% of the patients on the BV diagnosis. Peak head velocities, the order effect and covert saccades were not likely to have influenced the above mentioned results.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, using different VHIT systems in the same BV patient can lead to clinically significant differences in VOR gain, when using a cut-off value of 0.6. This might hinder proper diagnosis of BV patients. It would, therefore, be preferred that VHIT systems are standardised regarding eye and head tracking methods, and VOR gain calculation algorithms. Until then, it is advised to not only take the VOR gain in consideration when assessing a VHIT trial, but also look at the raw traces and the compensatory saccades.

Changes in Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Gain After Surgical Plugging of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), which is characterized by a “third mobile window” in the inner ear, causes various vestibular and auditory symptoms and signs. Surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal (SC) can eliminate the symptoms associated with increased perilymph mobility due to the presence of the third window. However, the natural course of vestibular function after surgical plugging remains unknown. Therefore, we explored longitudinal vestibular function after surgery in 11 subjects with SCD who underwent SC plugging using the middle cranial fossa approach. Changes in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain in all planes were measured over 1 year with the video head impulse test. We also evaluated surgical outcomes, including changes in symptoms, audiometric results, and electrophysiological tests, to assess whether plugging eliminated third mobile window effects. The mean VOR gain for the plugged SC decreased from 0.81 ± 0.05 before surgery to 0.65 ± 0.08 on examinations performed within 1 week after surgery but normalized thereafter. Four of seven subjects who were able to perform both VOR tests before surgery and immediately after surgery had pathologic values (SC VOR gain < 0.70). Conversely, the mean VOR gain in the other canals remained unchanged over 1 year. The majority of symptoms and signs were absent or markedly decreased at the last follow-up evaluation, and no complications associated with the surgery were reported. Surgical plugging significantly attenuated the air-bone gap, in particular at low frequencies, because of increased bone conduction thresholds and deceased air conduction thresholds. Moreover, surgical plugging significantly increased vestibular-evoked myogenic potential thresholds and decreased the ratio of summating potential to action potential in plugged ears. Postoperative heavily T2-weighted images were available for two subjects and showed complete obliteration of the T2-bright signal intensity in the patent SC lumen in preoperative imaging based on filling defect at the site of plugging. Our results suggest that successful plugging of dehiscent SCs is closely associated with a transient, rather than persistent, disturbance of labyrinthine activity exclusively involved in plugged SCs, which may have clinical implications for timely and individualized vestibular rehabilitation.

Audiometric and cVEMP Thresholds Show Little Correlation With Symptoms in Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the relationship between objective audiometric and vestibular tests and patient symptoms in superior canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Ninety-eight patients with SCD, preoperative threshold audiograms, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) thresholds, and computed tomography (CT) imaging were included. Clinical reports were reviewed for self-reported SCD symptoms. Twenty-five patients completed the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Autophony Index (AI), and the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlations between preoperative low-frequency air-bone gap (ABG), cVEMP thresholds, and symptoms (including HHI, DHI, AI, and SF-36). Symptoms included hearing loss, aural fullness, autophony, hyperacusis, tinnitus, vertigo, imbalance and sound-, pressure and exercise provoked dizziness. Secondary outcome measure: Correlations between changes of objective and subjective measures before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients who reported hearing loss had larger ABGs at 250 Hz than patients without subjective hearing loss (p = 0.001). ABGs and cVEMP thresholds did not correlate with any other symptom. No significant correlation was found between ABG or cVEMP threshold and the HHI, DHI, AI or Health Utility Value (derived from the SF-36 quality of life score). Following SCD surgery, ABG decreased (p < 0.001), cVEMP thresholds increased (p < 0.001) and overall symptoms, handicap scores and quality-of-life improved; however, there was no significant relationship between these measures.

CONCLUSION

While threshold audiometry and cVEMP are important tools to diagnose SCD and monitor surgical outcomes, these measures showed no significant correlation with vestibular and most auditory symptoms or their severity.

Video Head Impulse Test in Labyrinthine Fistula due to Middle Ear Cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVES

To assess and monitor lateral semicircular canal (LSC) function over time in patients affected by chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma (CHO) complicated by fistula of LSC (LSC-F) before and after surgery using video Head Impulse Test (vHIT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight patients aged 18-67 years affected by CHO with imaging-ascertained LSC-F were included in this preliminary prospective study. The following protocol has been applied: oto-microscopic diagnosis with patient's history; computed tomography scan of the temporal bone; surgery with concomitant resurfacing of LSF-F; audiological and vestibular evaluation before surgery (T0) and at 30 days (T1), 6 months (T2), and 1 year after surgery (T3). vHIT was used to assess vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in LSC.

RESULTS

None of the patients showed deterioration of bone conduction hearing levels during the different time of evaluation. Three patients showed a reduced VOR gain and catch-up saccades at T0, with VOR gain normalization at T2. This finding remained stable at the 1-year follow-up. The VOR gain in the nonaffected side generally experienced an increase, paralleled by the normalization on the affected side, with statistically significant correlation. The subjects with normal vHIT before surgery did not show any variation following surgery.

CONCLUSION

vHIT allows the assessment of LSC function in case of fistula. The adopted surgical fistula repair did not induce deterioration of the auditory or LSC function, but indeed, it could prevent worsening and help promoting recovery to the normal function.

The Video Head Impulse Test

In 1988, we introduced impulsive testing of semicircular canal (SCC) function measured with scleral search coils and showed that it could accurately and reliably detect impaired function even of a single lateral canal. Later we showed that it was also possible to test individual vertical canal function in peripheral and also in central vestibular disorders and proposed a physiological mechanism for why this might be so. For the next 20 years, between 1988 and 2008, impulsive testing of individual SCC function could only be accurately done by a few aficionados with the time and money to support scleral search-coil systems—an expensive, complicated and cumbersome, semi-invasive technique that never made the transition from the research lab to the dizzy clinic. Then, in 2009 and 2013, we introduced a video method of testing function of each of the six canals individually. Since 2009, the method has been taken up by most dizzy clinics around the world, with now close to 100 refereed articles in PubMed. In many dizzy clinics around the world, video Head Impulse Testing has supplanted caloric testing as the initial and in some cases the final test of choice in patients with suspected vestibular disorders. Here, we consider seven current, interesting, and controversial aspects of video Head Impulse Testing: (1) introduction to the test; (2) the progress from the head impulse protocol (HIMPs) to the new variant—suppression head impulse protocol (SHIMPs); (3) the physiological basis for head impulse testing; (4) practical aspects and potential pitfalls of video head impulse testing; (5) problems of vestibulo-ocular reflex gain calculations; (6) head impulse testing in central vestibular disorders; and (7) to stay right up-to-date—new clinical disease patterns emerging from video head impulse testing. With thanks and appreciation we dedicate this article to our friend, colleague, and mentor, Dr Bernard Cohen of Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, who since his first article 55 years ago on compensatory eye movements induced by vertical SCC stimulation has become one of the giants of the vestibular world.

Electrophysiological Measurements of Peripheral Vestibular Function-A Review of Electrovestibulography

Electrocochleography (EcochG), incorporating the Cochlear Microphonic (CM), the Summating Potential (SP), and the cochlear Compound Action Potential (CAP), has been used to study cochlear function in humans and experimental animals since the 1930s, providing a simple objective tool to assess both hair cell (HC) and nerve sensitivity. The vestibular equivalent of ECochG, termed here Electrovestibulography (EVestG), incorporates responses of the vestibular HCs and nerve. Few research groups have utilized EVestG to study vestibular function. Arguably, this is because stimulating the cochlea in isolation with sound is a trivial matter, whereas stimulating the vestibular system in isolation requires significantly more technical effort. That is, the vestibular system is sensitive to both high-level sound and bone-conducted vibrations, but so is the cochlea, and gross electrical responses of the inner ear to such stimuli can be difficult to interpret. Fortunately, several simple techniques can be employed to isolate vestibular electrical responses. Here, we review the literature underpinning gross vestibular nerve and HC responses, and we discuss the nomenclature used in this field. We also discuss techniques for recording EVestG in experimental animals and humans and highlight how EVestG is furthering our understanding of the vestibular system.