The Effect of Systemic Steroid on Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation via Round Window Approach: A Guinea Pig Model

Sialyllactose preserves residual hearing after cochlear implantation

In individuals with hearing loss, protection of residual hearing is essential following cochlear implantation to facilitate acoustic and electric hearing. Hearing preservation requires slow insertion, atraumatic electrode and delivery of the optimal quantity of a pharmacological agent. Several studies have reported variable hearing outcomes with osmotic pump-mediated steroid delivery. New drugs, such as sialyllactose (SL) which have anti-inflammatory effect in many body parts, can prevent tissue overgrowth. In the present study, the positive effects of the pharmacological agent SL against insults were evaluated in vitro using HEI-OC1 cells. An animal model to simulate the damage due to electrode insertion during cochlear implantation was used. SL was delivered using osmotic pumps to prevent loss of the residual hearing in this animal model. Hearing deterioration, tissue fibrosis and ossification were confirmed in this animal model. Increased gene expressions of inflammatory cytokines were identified in the cochleae following dummy electrode insertion. Following the administration of SL, insertion led to a decrease in hearing threshold shifts, tissue reactions, and inflammatory markers. These results emphasize the possible role of SL in hearing preservation and improve our understanding of the mechanism underlying hearing loss after cochlear implantation.

Recent advances in Otology: Current landscape and future direction

Hearing is an essential sensation, and its deterioration leads to a significant decrease in the quality of life. Thus, great efforts have been made by otologists to preserve and recover hearing. Our knowledge regarding the field of otology has progressed with advances in technology, and otologists have sought to develop novel approaches in the field of otologic surgery to achieve higher hearing recovery or preservation rates. This requires knowledge regarding the anatomy of the temporal bone and the physiology of hearing. Basic research in the field of otology has progressed with advances in molecular biology and genetics. This review summarizes the current views and recent advances in the field of otology and otologic surgery, especially from the viewpoint of young Japanese clinician-scientists, and presents the perspectives and future directions for several topics in the field of otology. This review will aid next-generation researchers in understanding the recent advances and future challenges in the field of otology.

Impact of Endolymphatic Hydrops and Semicircular Canal Dysfunction on the Incomplete Recovery of Acute Low-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

The reasons for short-term, incomplete recovery of some acute low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (ALFHL) are unclear. We investigated the impact of endolymphatic hydrops and semicircular canal dysfunction on the incomplete recovery of ALFHL.

METHODS

The impact of electrocochleography (EcochG), caloric test, video head impulse test (vHIT), cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) results on the incomplete recovery of 86 patients with ALFHL was analyzed. The correlation between a high abnormal rate of vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) and aural fullness, dizziness, and level of hearing loss was also examined.

RESULTS

Abnormal oVEMP with an odds ratio (OR) of 6.071 (P = .002) and EcochG with an OR of 5.919 (P = .005) were independent risk factors for incomplete recovery in ALFHL, but abnormal cVEMP, caloric test, and vHIT were not independent risk factors for ALFHL. There was no correlation between a high abnormal rate of VEMP and aural fullness, dizziness, or level of hearing loss in ALFHL.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal oVEMP and EcochG values rather than caloric test and vHIT were risk factors for incomplete recovery of ALFHL, which may be related to the difficulty of successfully treating utricular and cochlear hydrops. High abnormal rate of VEMP was not correlated with hearing loss level, aural fullness, or dizziness in ALFHL. Abnormal oVEMP and EcochG values can indicate poor short-term prognosis of ALFHL.

Zwitterionic Polymer/Polydopamine Coating of Electrode Arrays Reduces Fibrosis and Residual Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation

Since the first surgery 50 years ago, cochlear implantation (CI) is the major treatment for patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss. However, unexpected foreign body reactions (FBRs) after surgery are reported in 90% of CI recipients, resulting in the formation of fibrosis in the cochlea and progressive residual hearing loss. Zwitterion modification is universally used to reduce bio-fouling and suppress FBRs but never for CI. In the present study, a zwitterionic coating is developed, which is composed of poly sulfobetaine methacrylate (PSB) and polydopamine (PDA) for cochlear implants. The PSB-PDA coating shows a series of characters for an ideal anti-FBRs material, including super-hydrophilicity, low protein and cell adsorption, long-term stability, and high biocompatibility. Compared to the uncoated controls, PSB-PDA coating inhibits the activation of macrophages and reduces the release of inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, NO) and fibrosis-related factors (TGF-β1, α-SMA, collagen I). PSB-PDA coated electrode arrays suppress fibrosis completely and preserve residual hearing significantly in rat CI models. These results suggest that PSB-PDA coating is a novel strategy for anti-fibrosis to improve the outcomes of CI.

Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

Different patterns of electrocochleographic responses along the electrode array after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array have been described. However, the implications of these patterns remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of the study was to correlate different peri- and postoperative electrocochleographic patterns with four-point impedance measurements and preservation of residual hearing.

DESIGN

Thirty-nine subjects with residual low-frequency hearing which were implanted with a slim-straight electrode array could prospectively be included. Intracochlear electrocochleographic recordings and four-point impedance measurements along the 22 electrodes of the array (EL, most apical EL22) were conducted immediately after complete insertion and 3 months after surgery. Hearing preservation was assessed after 3 months.

RESULTS

In perioperative electrocochleographic recordings, 22 subjects (56%) showed the largest amplitude around the tip of the electrode array (apical-peak, AP, EL20 or EL22), whereas 17 subjects (44%) exhibited a maximum amplitude in more basal regions (mid-peak, MP, EL18 or lower). At 3 months, in six subjects with an AP pattern perioperatively, the location of the largest electrocochleographic response had shifted basally (apical-to-mid-peak, AP-MP). Latency was analyzed along the electrode array when this could be discerned. This was the case in 68 peri- and postoperative recordings (87% of all recordings, n = 78). The latency increased with increasing insertion depth in AP recordings (n = 38, median of EL with maximum latency shift = EL21). In MP recordings (n = 30), the maximum latency shift was detectable more basally (median EL12, p < 0.001). Four-point impedance measurements were available at both time points in 90% (n = 35) of all subjects. At the 3-month time point, recordings revealed lower impedances in the AP group (n = 15, mean = 222 Ω, SD = 63) than in the MP (n = 14, mean = 295 Ω, SD= 7 6) and AP-MP groups (n = 6, mean = 234 Ω, SD = 129; AP versus MP p = 0.026, AP versus AP-MP p = 0.023, MP versus AP-MP p > 0.999). The amplitudes of perioperative AP recordings showed a correlation with preoperative hearing thresholds (r2=0.351, p = 0.004). No such correlation was detectable in MP recordings (r2 = 0.033, p = 0.484). Audiograms were available at both time points in 97% (n = 38) of all subjects. The mean postoperative hearing loss in the AP group was 13 dB (n = 16, SD = 9). A significantly larger hearing loss was detectable in the MP and AP-MP groups with 28 (n = 17, SD = 10) and 35 dB (n = 6, SD = 13), respectively (AP versus MP p = 0.002, AP versus AP-MP p = 0.002, MP versus AP-MP p = 0.926).

CONCLUSION

MP and AP-MP response patterns of the electrocochleographic responses along the electrode array after cochlear implantation are correlated with higher four-point impedances and poorer postoperative hearing compared to AP response patterns. The higher impedances suggest that MP and AP-MP patterns are associated with increased intracochlear fibrosis.

Cochlear implants: Causes, effects and mitigation strategies for the foreign body response and inflammation

Cochlear implants provide effective auditory rehabilitation for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Recent advances in cochlear implant technology and surgical approaches have enabled a greater number of patients to benefit from this technology, including those with significant residual low frequency acoustic hearing. Nearly all cochleae implanted with a cochlear implant electrode array develop an inflammatory and fibrotic response. This tissue reaction can have deleterious consequences for implant function, residual acoustic hearing, and the development of the next generation of cochlear prosthetics. This article reviews the current understanding of the inflammatory/foreign body response (FBR) after cochlear implant surgery, its impact on clinical outcome, and therapeutic strategies to mitigate this response. Findings from both in human subjects and animal models across a variety of species are highlighted. Electrode array design, surgical techniques, implant materials, and the degree and type of electrical stimulation are some critical factors that affect the FBR and inflammation. Modification of these factors and various anti-inflammatory pharmacological interventions have been shown to mitigate the inflammatory/FBR response. Ongoing and future approaches that seek to limit surgical trauma and curb the FBR to the implanted biomaterials of the electrode array are discussed. A better understanding of the anatomical, cellular and molecular basis of the inflammatory/FBR response after cochlear implantation has the potential to improve the outcome of current cochlear implants and also facilitate the development of the next generation of neural prostheses.

Systemic methylprednisolone for hearing preservation during cochlear implant surgery: A double blinded placebo-controlled trial

AIM

To assess whether a single, peri-operative, high dose of methylprednisolone can improve the preservation of residual acoustic hearing following cochlear implantation (CI).

METHODS

This was a double blinded placebo-controlled trial, performed in a tertiary academic centre. The hypothesis was that methylprednisolone would improve the preservation of hearing, and lower electrode impedances. Adult patients (18-85 years) with hearing at 85 dB or better at 500 Hz in the ear to be implanted were randomly allocated to either treatment (methylprednisolone, 1g administered intravenously upon induction of anaesthesia) or control (normal saline infusion). As per standard clinical practice, all patients received a routine dose of dexamethasone (8 mg intravenously) on induction of anaesthesia. Implantation was undertaken with a slim and flexible lateral wall electrode via the round window. Surgical technique was routine, with adherence to soft surgical principles. The primary outcome was hearing preservation within 20 dB at 500 Hz, 12 months following cochlear implantation. Secondary outcomes included hearing preservation at 6 weeks and 3 months, monopolar electrode impedance, and Consonant-Vowel-Consonant (CVC) Phoneme scores at 3 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled into the control group and 48 patients received the steroid. The number of patients achieving hearing preservation at 12 months did not differ significantly between those receiving methylprednisolone treatment and the controls. There were no differences in hearing preservation at any frequency at either 6 weeks or 3 months after implantation. Neither CVC phoneme scores nor electrode impedances differed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper demonstrates that high-dose local steroid injection at surgery was not effective in preventing a loss of residual hearing, improving speech perception, or lowering electrode impedances. The findings were contrary to the experimental literature, and emerging clinical evidence that steroid elution from implant electrodes influences cochlear biology in humans. We found no evidence to support the widely-held practice of administering intravenous steroids in the perioperative period, in an attempt to preserve residual hearing.

Dexamethasone delivery for hearing preservation in animal cochlear implant model: continuity, long-term release, and fast release rate

Background: Clinically, steroids have been used for hearing preservation both topically and systemically during cochlear implantation.Objective: This study compared steroid efficacy for hearing preservation among different types of delivery modes using an animal experiment.Materials and methods: For 76 guinea pigs, topical and systemic delivery methods, four pump types with different infusion rates, delivery durations, and total steroid amounts were used. Threshold changes of 8, 16, and 32 kHz after dummy electrode insertion were evaluated at 1 and 4 weeks and compared among delivery method and pump types. Inflammatory response in the cochlea was histologically compared.Results: For topical delivery groups, long-term release showed advantages in preserving hearing. Systemic delivery groups showed smaller threshold shifts than control group in all frequencies (p > .05). In short-term low dose application, compared to topical delivery, systemic delivery showed advantage in hearing preservation at both time point. However, others fail to show significant difference between two methods. Histologically, inflammatory response in the scala tympani at the basal turn was less in systemic delivery, especially in high dose and long-term.Conclusion and significance: The difference of hearing preservation was not obvious between two delivery methods. Higher dose and longer duration might have advantages in hearing preservation.

Long-Term in vivo Release Profile of Dexamethasone-Loaded Silicone Rods Implanted Into the Cochlea of Guinea Pigs

Glucocorticoids are used intra-operatively in cochlear implant surgeries to reduce the inflammatory reaction caused by insertion trauma and the foreign body response against the electrode carrier after cochlear implantation. To prevent higher systemic concentrations of glucocorticoids that might cause undesirable systemic side effects, the drug should be applied locally. Since rapid clearance of glucocorticoids occurs in the inner ear fluid spaces, sustained application is supposedly more effective in suppressing foreign body and tissue reactions and in preserving neuronal structures. Embedding of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone into the cochlear implant electrode carrier and its continuous release may solve this problem. The aim of the present study was to examine how dexamethasone concentrations in the electrode carrier influence drug levels in the perilymph at different time points. Silicone rods were implanted through a cochleostomy into the basal turn of the scala tympani of guinea pigs. The silicone rods were loaded homogeneously with 0.1, 1, and 10% concentrations of dexamethasone. After implantation, dexamethasone concentrations in perilymph and cochlear tissue were measured at several time points over a period of up to 7 weeks. The kinetic was concentration-dependent and showed an initial burst release in the 10%- and the 1%-dexamethasone-loaded electrode carrier dummies. The 10%-loaded electrode carrier resulted in a more elevated and longer lasting burst release than the 1%-loaded carrier. Following this initial burst release phase, sustained dexamethasone levels of about 60 and 100 ng/ml were observed in the perilymph for the 1 and 10% loaded rods, respectively, during the remainder of the observation time. The 0.1% loaded carrier dummy achieved very low perilymph drug levels of about 0.5 ng/ml. The cochlear tissue drug concentration shows a similar dynamic to the perilymph drug concentration, but only reaches about 0.005–0.05% of the perilymph drug concentration. Dexamethasone can be released from silicone electrode carrier dummies in a controlled and sustained way over a period of several weeks, leading to constant drug concentrations in the scala tympani perilymph. No accumulation of dexamethasone was observed in the cochlear tissue. In consideration of experimental studies using similar drug depots and investigating physiological effects, an effective dose range between 50 and 100 ng/ml after burst release is suggested for the CI insertion trauma model.

Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials

OBJECTIVE

To report current knowledge on the topic of intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response following cochlear implantation (CI).

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed to identify peer-reviewed articles. Search components included "cochlear implant," "Foreign body response (FBR)," and "fibrosis." Original studies and review articles relevant to the topic were included.

RESULTS

Ninety peer-reviewed articles describing the foreign body response or intracochlear fibrosis following CI were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracochlear fibrosis following CI represents a significant limiting factor for the success of CI users. Several strategies have been employed to mitigate the foreign body response within the cochlea including drug delivery systems and modifications in surgical technique and electrode design. A better understanding of the FBR has the potential to improve CI outcomes and the next generation of cochlear prostheses.

Long-term effects and potential limits of intratympanic dexamethasone-loaded hydrogels combined with dexamethasone-eluting cochlear electrodes in a low-insertion trauma Guinea pig model

Cochlear implantation has become the most effective hearing restoration method and is one of the great advances in modern medicine. Early implants have been continuously developed into more efficient devices, and electro-acoustic stimulation is increasingly expanding the indication criteria for cochlear implants to patients with more residual hearing. Therefore, protecting the cochlear structures and maintaining its intrinsic capacities like residual hearing has become more important than ever before. In the present study, we aimed to assess the long-term protective effects of a dexamethasone-eluting electrode combined with the preoperative intratympanic application of a dexamethasone-loaded thermoreversible hydrogel in a cochlear implant guinea pig model. 40 normal-hearing animals were equally randomized into a control group receiving an unloaded hydrogel and a non-eluting electrode, a group receiving a dexamethasone-loaded hydrogel and a non-eluting electrode, a group receiving an unloaded hydrogel and a dexamethasone-eluting electrode and a group receiving both a dexamethasone-loaded hydrogel and a dexamethasone-eluting electrode. Residual hearing and impedances were investigated during a period of 120 days. Tissue response and histological changes of cochlear structures were analyzed at the end of the experiments. Treatment with dexamethasone did not show a significant protective effect on residual hearing independent of treatment group. Although the majority of the cochleae didn't exhibit any signs of electrode insertion trauma, a small degree of tissue response could be observed in all animals without a significant difference between the groups. Foreign body giant cells and osteogenesis were significantly associated with tissue response. Hair cells, synapsin-1-positive cells and spiral ganglion cells were preserved in all study groups. Cochlear implantation using a dexamethasone-eluting electrode alone and in combination with a dexamethasone-loaded hydrogel significantly protected auditory nerve fibers on day 120. Post-implantation impedances were equal across study groups and remained stable over the duration of the experiment. In this study we were able to show that use of a dexamethasone-eluting electrode alone and in combination with preoperative application of dexamethasone-loaded hydrogel significantly protects auditory nerve fibers. Furthermore, we have shown that a cochlear implantation-associated hearing threshold shift and tissue response may not be completely prevented by the sole application of dexamethasone.

A novel experimental intraperitoneal infection model for Haemophilus parasuis in neutropenic guinea pigs

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilus parasuis, one of the major swine pathogens, has at least fifteen different types, all of which have significant economic effects on the global swine industry. The aim of this study was to establish an experimental intraperitoneal infection model for H. parasuis in neutropenic guinea pigs.

METHODS

Intraperitoneal administration of cyclophosphamide and Haemophilus parasuis was conducted in guinea pigs. Clinical signs, gross pathology, and histopathology were observed in neutropenic guinea pigs infected with H. parasuis.

RESULTS

Intraperitoneal administration of 100 mg/kg cyclophosphamide led to immunosuppression with white blood cells, lymphocytes, and neutrophils all <1000 mm³, while no histological tissue damage was observed. Intraperitoneal administration of 10⁹ colony-forming units (CFU) of H. parasuis led to typical respiratory symptoms, 90% morbidity, and 20% mortality in a 72 h-period. Bacteriological screening revealed that multiple organs, including the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and blood, were infected with H. parasuis. The threshold loads of bacteria in blood and the lungs were (7.04 ± 0.53)log₁₀ CFU/mL and (6.24 ± 0.62)log₁₀ CFU/g, respectively, at 3 d after infection. Gross pathology examination showed celiac effusion, intestinal mucosal hemorrhage, and liver, spleen, or lung swelling, necrosis, and hemorrhage. Congestion, mild interstitial pneumonia, inflammatory exudation, and endothelial cell proliferation were observed in the histological examination.

DISCUSSION

All the results suggest that we have established an experimental intraperitoneal infection model for H. parasuis in neutropenic guinea pigs. It is especially useful as a tool for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, or a pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) model of antimicrobial agents against respiratory disease.

Cochlear Implantation in the Guinea Pig

Cochlear implants are highly efficient devices that can restore hearing in subjects with profound hearing loss. Due to improved speech perception outcomes, candidacy criteria have been expanded over the last few decades. This includes patients with substantial residual hearing that benefit from electrical and acoustical stimulation of the same ear, which makes hearing preservation during cochlear implantation an important issue. Electrode impedances and the related issue of energy consumption is another major research field, as progress in this area could pave the way for fully implantable auditory prostheses. To address these issues in a systematic way, adequate animal models are essential. Therefore, the goal of this protocol is to provide an animal model of cochlear implantation, which can be used to address various research questions. Due to its large tympanic bulla, which allows easy surgical access to the inner ear, as well as its hearing range which is relatively similar to the hearing range of humans, the guinea pig is a commonly used species in auditory research. Cochlear implantation in the guinea pig is performed via a retroauricular approach. Through the bullostomy a cochleostomy is drilled and the cochlear implant electrode is inserted into the scala tympani. This electrode can then be used for electrical stimulation, determination of electrode impedances and the measurement of compound action potentials of the auditory nerve. In addition to these applications, cochlear implant electrodes can also be used as drug delivery devices, if a topical delivery of pharmaceutical agents to the cells or fluids of the inner ear is intended.

Effects of dexamethasone on intracochlear inflammation and residual hearing after cochleostomy: A comparison of administration routes

Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant is an important issue with regards to hearing performance. Various methods of steroid administration have been widely used in clinical practice to reduce inflammation and preserve residual hearing. Here we compare the effect of different routes of dexamethasone administration on intracochlear inflammation and residual hearing in guinea pig ears. Dexamethasone was delivered into the guinea pigs either through intracochlear, intratympanic or systemic route. The intracochlear concentration of dexamethasone, residual hearing, inflammatory cytokines and histopathologic changes were evaluated over time. A higher intracochlear dexamethasone concentration was observed after intracochlear administration than through the other routes. Residual hearing was better preserved with local dexamethasone administration as was supported by the reduced inflammatory cytokines, more hair cell survival and less severe intracochlear fibrosis and ossification concurrently seen in the local delivery group than in the systemic group. The results demonstrate that local dexamethasone delivery can reduce intracochlear inflammation and preserve residual hearing better than in systemically administered dexamethasone.