The Efficacy of a Home Treatment Program Combined With Office-Based Canalith Repositioning Procedure for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo—A Randomized Controlled Trial

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo without dizziness is common in people presenting to falls clinics

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo without dizziness, a treatable falls risk factor in people attending outpatient falls clinics.

METHODS

Over 6 years, 618 people at risk of falls attending 2 falls clinics were assessed for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, whether dizzy or non dizzy. Data regarding demographics, canal location of positive tests and comorbidities were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine percent (238) of people with falls risk tested positive for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; 62 (26%) or 1 in 4 of those testing positive were not dizzy. Thirty-nine of 104 (38%) testing positive for single canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and twenty-four of 134 (18%) testing positive for multiple canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo were not dizzy. Comorbidities were common for all with falls risk but did not differentiate for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo on testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is common in people attending falls clinics and contributes to falls risk. Dizziness is common in BPPV though 26% or 1 in 4 people testing positive were not dizzy and would be missed without mandatory testing. Testing should also include all semicircular canals as multiple-canal involvement was high.

Adoption of clinical practice guidelines in cases of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

PURPOSE

Despite being one of the most common types of the peripheral vertigo encountered in clinical practice, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, even in affluent health care systems. The publication of fully updated clinical practice guidelines significantly facilitated the diagnosis and treatment of BPPV. This study evaluates the adoption of the guidelines in our clinical setting and reviews further recommendations for quality-of-care improvement.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional survey included a total of 1155 adult patients diagnosed with BPPV at the biggest tertiary care center in the country during a 5-year period (2017-2021). The data for the first three years (2017-2020) and 919 patients were collected in full, and for the remaining 236 patients (2020-2021) only partially due to the disturbance in referrals caused by COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

The familiarity with and adherence to the published clinical guidelines by physicians judged by patients' charts and our health care database were overall unsatisfactory. The adherence varied from 0 to 40.5% in our sample. The recommendations for making the diagnosis and for repositioning procedure as first-line therapy were followed in only 20-30% of cases.

CONCLUSION

There are large opportunities for improvement in quality of care of BPPV patients. Apart from constant and systematic education at the primary health care level, the health care system may need to adopt more advanced measures of ensuring better adherence to guidelines and subsequent reduction in medical costs.

Efficacy of Epley's maneuver plus betahistine in the management of PC-BPPV: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy of Epley's maneuver plus betahistine in the management of patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PC-BPPV).

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang were searched from their inception to April, 2022. The effect size was analyzed by calculating the pooled risk ratio estimates of efficacy rate, recurrence rate, and standardized mean differences (SMD) of dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) score with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sensitive analysis was performed simultaneously.

RESULTS

A total of 9 randomized controlled trials with 860 PC-BPPV patients were included in the meta-analysis, in which 432 were treated with Epley's maneuver plus betahistine, and 428 received Epley's maneuver alone. The meta-analysis revealed that Epley's maneuver plus betahistine significantly improved DHI score than Epley's maneuver alone (SMD = -0.61, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.26, P = .001). In addition, both Epley's maneuver plus betahistine and Epley's maneuver groups had comparable outcomes in efficacy rate and recurrence rate.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that Epley's maneuver plus betahistine in PC-BPPV patients had favorable effects on DHI score.

Feasibility of an inertial measurement unit sensor-based guiding system for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo treatment: A pilot study

Performing an accurate canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) is important for treating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, because inadequate rotational head angles can result in ineffective otolith mobilization and consequent treatment failure. Specialists-guided Epley maneuver reportedly had mean errors of 13.7°-24.4° while they were significantly larger (40.0°-51.5°) when self-administered. Similar results were obtained for the Barbeque maneuver: mean errors were 9.2°-13.0° by the specialists while they were significantly larger (22.9°-28.6°) when self-administered. Our study aimed to validate the feasibility of an inertial measurement unit sensor-based CRP (IMU-CRP) by analyzing the differences in accuracy in the rotational angles, comparing them with education-based conventional CRP (EDU-CRP). A pilot validation was also performed by analyzing the treatment success rate of IMU-CRP in patients with BPPV. This single-institution prospective, comparative effectiveness study examined 19 participants without active vertigo or prior knowledge of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and CRP. Participants conducted the Epley and Barbeque roll maneuvers without and with auditory guidance (EDU-CRP vs. IMU-CRP, respectively) twice, and head rotation accuracies were compared. Differences in target angles based on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines were considered errors. For BPPV participants, treatment success was assessed based on the presence or absence of nystagmus, vertigo, and dizziness. For all the Epley and Barbeque roll maneuvers steps, the absolute errors were smaller for IMU- than for EDU-CRPs, with significant differences in steps 2-4 and 3-6 of the Epley and Barbeque roll maneuvers, respectively. A learning effect was found in steps 4 and 5 of the Barbeque roll maneuver but not in the Epley maneuver. The treatment success rates after 1 h were 71.4% and 100% for the Epley and Barbeque roll maneuvers, respectively. Real-time feedback on head rotation angles induced more appropriate movements in the Epley and Barbeque roll maneuvers. A guiding device based on head monitoring providing real-time auditory feedback may increase the self-administered CRP success rates in treating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

The Additional Effect of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy on Residual Dizziness After Successful Modified Epley Procedure for Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the additional effect of vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) compared with the modified Epley procedure alone on residual dizziness after a successful modified Epley procedure in patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Method In this cross-sectional analytical comparative study, 47 patients (35 women and 12 men) aged 18-80 years with posterior canal BPPV were randomly assigned to one of two following groups: the control group, who received the modified Epley procedure only, and the VRT group, who received the modified Epley procedure plus vestibular rehabilitation for 4 weeks. Outcome measures, including the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), the Vertigo Symptom Scale-Long Version (VSS-L), and the Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form (VSS-SF), were conducted on the same session before initial therapy (T1), at 48 hr later (T2), and at 4 weeks later (T3). Presence or absence of residual dizziness was evaluated at T2. Results Residual dizziness was found in 20 (42.6%) patients after a successful modified Epley procedure. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean DHI, VSS-L, and VSS-SF scores at T1, T2, and T3 in patients who manifested with residual dizziness and those without residual dizziness in both groups. The average DHI, VSS-L, and VSS-SF score reduced during the time in both groups. These results were demonstrated that the VRT group and the control group have similar reductions in symptoms after treatment with the VRT plus modified Epley procedure and the modified Epley procedure only, respectively. Conclusions Residual dizziness is a common condition after a successful modified Epley procedure for BPPV. The VRT plus modified Epley procedure is as effective as modified Epley procedure alone in the management of residual dizziness. Further studies with supervised and customized VRT and longer follow-up periods are needed. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14825508.

Posttraumatic Dizziness: Navigating the Maze Towards Accurate Vestibular Diagnosis and Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Highlight the importance of establishing a differential diagnosis to identify and treat multiple origins of dizziness in a patient following traumatic brain injury (TBI).

PATIENT

73-year-old man with TBI and temporal bone fracture developed posttraumatic bilateral multiple canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).

INTERVENTION

Multi-disciplinary diagnostic evaluation and vestibular rehabilitation (VR) treatment focused on canalith repositioning maneuvers (CRMs) and central adaptation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic imaging, audiometric testing, clinical evaluation including video recordings of patterns of nystagmus, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI).

RESULTS

Systematic clinical examination identified multiple semicircular canal BPPV in addition to a suspected underlying unilateral hypofunction. Treatment focused on the appropriate CRMs and adaptation exercises. DHI scores improved significantly and patient returned to work and recreational activities.

CONCLUSION

This Clinical Capsule Report highlights the importance of a comprehensive clinical evaluation of the TBI patient with dizziness when making an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. Due to the complexity of differentiating between multiple canal BPPV in addition to other central and vestibular disorders, it is imperative for the clinician to have a clear understanding of nystagmus patterns for multicanal BPPV as well as other vestibular pathology.

Single Cycle Versus Multiple Cycles of Canalith Repositioning Procedure for Treatment of Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment outcomes and complications of single cycle versus multiple cycles of the canalith repositioning procedure (CRP).

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center; Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

PATIENTS

One hundred and forty-three adults who had unilateral posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).

INTERVENTION

Therapeutic. Patients received either a single cycle or multiple cycles of the CRP in one session.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of negative Dix-Hallpike test (DHT), rate of symptom improvement, dizziness handicap inventory score (DHI), and rate of complications.

RESULTS

At the 1st week and the 4th week recall visits after CRP the treatment outcomes between the single-CRP group and the multiple-CRP group showed no significant difference. The outcomes included: 1) rate of negative DHT (1st week: 76.9 and 76.7%, 4th week: 89.5 and 88.2%); 2) rate of complete recovery or improved symptoms (1st week: 92.3 and 91.7%; 4th week: 96.5 and 98.0%); 3) DHI scores (1st week: 22 and 28; 4th week: 6 and 10); and 4) complication rate (1st week: 12.5 and 20%; 4th week: 20 and 0%. Rate of complications in the single-CRP group (6.9%) during the 1st treatment was lower than in the multiple-CRP groups (21.1%) (p-value = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

A single cycle of CRP is as effective as multiple cycle CRP, with a lower incidence of complication and a decrease in the time for treatment. Single-cycle CRP is a more advantageous treatment for unilateral posterior canal BPPV. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02701218.

Update on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of vertigo worldwide. This review considers recent advances in the diagnosis and management of BPPV including the use of web-based technology and artificial intelligence as well as the evidence supporting the use of vitamin D supplements for patients with BPPV and subnormal serum vitamin D.