Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays

Impact of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design on Post-Op Speech Perception

OBJECTIVE

Electrode array design may impact hearing outcomes in patients who receive cochlear implants. The goal of this work was to assess differences in post operative speech perception among patients who received cochlear implants of differing designs and lengths.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary Care Hospital.

METHODS

Patients (n = 129) received 1 of 9 electrode arrays, which were categorized by design: Lateral wall electrodes (n = 36) included CI522, CI622 (Cochlear Americas), Flex24, and Flex28 (Med El). Midscala electrodes (n = 16) included HiRes Ultra 3D (Advanced Bionics). Perimodiolar electrodes (n = 77) included CI512, CI532, CI612, and CI632 (Cochlear Americas). Speech perception was evaluated using consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) tests and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postimplantation.

RESULTS

Perimodiolar electrodes showed significantly higher CNC scores compared to lateral wall electrodes at 6 and 24 months. Perimodiolar electrodes also outperformed midscala electrodes at 12 months. An inverse relationship was observed between electrode length and CNC scores noted at 6, 12, and 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Perimodiolar electrode arrays, which tend to be shorter, demonstrated better speech perception outcomes compared to the longer lateral wall and midscala arrays at some timepoints. These findings suggest a potential advantages of perimodiolar electrodes for optimizing hearing outcomes.

Evaluation of a Slim Modiolar Electrode Array: A Temporal Bone Study

HYPOTHESIS

Evaluation of the Slim Modiolar (SM) electrode in temporal bones (TB) will elucidate the electrode's insertion outcomes.

BACKGROUND

The SM electrode was designed for atraumatic insertion into the scala tympani, for ideal perimodiolar positioning and with a smaller caliber to minimize interference with cochlear biological processes.

METHODS

The SM electrode was inserted into TBs via a cochleostomy. First, the axial force of insertion was measured. Next, TBs were inserted under fluoroscopy to study insertion dynamics, followed by histologic evaluation of electrode placement and cochlear trauma. A subset of TBs were inserted with the Contour Advance (CA) electrode for comparison.

RESULTS

Sixteen of 22 insertions performed to measure the axial force of insertion had flat or near zero insertion force profiles. Six insertions had increased insertion forces, which were attributed to improper sheath depth before electrode insertion. Under real-time fluoroscopy, 23 of 25 TBs had uneventful insertion and good perimodiolar placement. There was 1 scala vestibuli insertion due to suboptimal cochleostomy position and 1 tip roll over related to premature electrode deployment. When compared with the CA electrode, 14 of 15 insertions with the SM electrode resulted in a more perimodiolar electrode position. No evidence of trauma was found in histologic evaluation of the 24 TBs with scala tympani insertions.

CONCLUSION

TB evaluation revealed that the SM electrode exerts minimal insertion forces on cochlear structures, produces no histologic evidence of trauma, and reliably assumes the perimodiolar position. Nonstandard cochleostomy location, improper sheath insertion depth, or premature deployment of the electrode may lead to suboptimal outcomes.

Recent advances in Otology: Current landscape and future direction

Hearing is an essential sensation, and its deterioration leads to a significant decrease in the quality of life. Thus, great efforts have been made by otologists to preserve and recover hearing. Our knowledge regarding the field of otology has progressed with advances in technology, and otologists have sought to develop novel approaches in the field of otologic surgery to achieve higher hearing recovery or preservation rates. This requires knowledge regarding the anatomy of the temporal bone and the physiology of hearing. Basic research in the field of otology has progressed with advances in molecular biology and genetics. This review summarizes the current views and recent advances in the field of otology and otologic surgery, especially from the viewpoint of young Japanese clinician-scientists, and presents the perspectives and future directions for several topics in the field of otology. This review will aid next-generation researchers in understanding the recent advances and future challenges in the field of otology.

Cochlear implant electrode design for safe and effective treatment

The optimal placement of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode inside the scala tympani compartment to create an effective electrode-neural interface is the base for a successful CI treatment. The characteristics of an effective electrode design include (a) electrode matching every possible variation in the inner ear size, shape, and anatomy, (b) electrically covering most of the neuronal elements, and (c) preserving intra-cochlear structures, even in non-hearing preservation surgeries. Flexible electrode arrays of various lengths are required to reach an angular insertion depth of 680° to which neuronal cell bodies are angularly distributed and to minimize the rate of electrode scalar deviation. At the time of writing this article, the current scientific evidence indicates that straight lateral wall electrode outperforms perimodiolar electrode by preventing electrode tip fold-over and scalar deviation. Most of the available literature on electrode insertion depth and hearing outcomes supports the practice of physically placing an electrode to cover both the basal and middle turns of the cochlea. This is only achievable with longer straight lateral wall electrodes as single-sized and pre-shaped perimodiolar electrodes have limitations in reaching beyond the basal turn of the cochlea and in offering consistent modiolar hugging placement in every cochlea. For malformed inner ear anatomies that lack a central modiolar trunk, the perimodiolar electrode is not an effective electrode choice. Most of the literature has failed to demonstrate superiority in hearing outcomes when comparing perimodiolar electrodes with straight lateral wall electrodes from single CI manufacturers. In summary, flexible and straight lateral wall electrode type is reported to be gentle to intra-cochlear structures and has the potential to electrically stimulate most of the neuronal elements, which are necessary in bringing full benefit of the CI device to recipients.

Intraoperative EABR Testing Predicts Strength of Cochlear Implant Stimulation Optimized After Long-Term Use in Pediatric Malformation Ears

OBJECTIVE

This study focused on the intensities of cochlear implant (CI) stimulation in pediatric CI users with inner ear malformation or cochlear nerve deficiency (CND). In this population, CI programming is difficult because a large intensity of CI stimulation is required to achieve sufficient hearing, but the excess CI stimuli often induce facial nerve stimulation. We aimed to assess whether the results of intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) testing predict maximum current levels of CI stimuli (cC levels) optimized by a behavioral-based method after long-term CI use.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case review.

SETTING

A tertiary referral CI center.

PATIENTS

A total of 116 ears with malformations (malformation group) and 63 control ears (control group) from patients younger than 18 years who received CI. The malformation group comprised 23 ears with a common cavity (CC), 26 with incomplete partition type 1 (IP-1), 26 with incomplete partition type 2 (IP-2), and 41 with CND.

INTERVENTIONS

Diagnostic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlation between intraoperative EABR results and cC levels determined by the behavioral-based CI programming after long-term CI use.

RESULTS

The CC, IP-1, and CND ears required significantly larger cC levels than the IP-2 ears and control groups. However, the cC levels increased to reach the plateau 1 year after surgery in all groups. Among the malformation group, 79 ears underwent intraoperative EABR testing. Greater than 80% of the CC, IP-1, and IP-2 ears and 54.8% of the CND ears exhibited evoked wave V (eV) and were included in the eV-positive category. Myogenic responses but no eV were observed in 18.2, 15.0, and 35.5% of the CC, IP-1, and CND ears, defined as the myogenic category. No eV or myogenic response was elicited in 9.7% of the CND ears. We focused on minimum current levels that elicited eV (eV levels) in the eV-positive category and maximum current levels that did not elicit any myogenic responses (myogenic levels) in the myogenic category. A significant relationship was detected between the eV levels and the cC levels. When analyzed in each malformation type, the eV levels significantly correlate with the cC levels in the CC and CND ears but not in the IP-1 and IP-2 ears, probably because of slight variation within the IP-1 group and the small number of the IP-2 group. The myogenic category did not show a significant relationship between the myogenic levels and cC levels, but the cC levels were similar to or smaller than the myogenic levels in most ears.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that intraoperative EABR testing helps predict the optimal cC levels in malformation ears. EABR-based CI programming immediately after cochlear implantation, followed by behavioral-based CI programming, may allow us to achieve early postoperative optimization of CI maps even in young children with severe malformations.

Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design and Speech Understanding

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implant electrode arrays are categorized based on their design as lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar (PM) electrode arrays. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LW versus PM designs on postoperative speech perception across multiple manufacturers and over long follow-up durations.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 478 adult cochlear implant recipients, implanted between the years 1992 and 2017.

INTERVENTIONSS

PM versus LW cochlear implants.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Postoperative Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Word (CNC-w) and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) scores between 6 months and 5 years.

RESULTS

Across 478 patients, approximately one-third received LW (n = 176, 36.8%), whereas 302 patients received a PM array (63.2%). The PM group had higher CNC-w scores from 6 months to 2 years (52 [interquartile range, 38-68] versus 48 [31-62], p = 0.036) and from 2 to 5 years (58 [43-72] versus 48 [33-66], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of patient-averaged scores indicated that the PM group had greater improvement from preoperative scores at all time points after the initial 6 months for both CNC-w ( β = 4.4 [95% confidence interval, 0.6-8.3], p = 0.023) and HINT testing ( β = 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.3-8.7], p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that PM electrode arrays are associated with small increases in postoperative speech perception scores, relative to LW arrays, when assessed across manufacturers, over long time durations, and using multiple outcome instruments. These findings may help guide surgeon selection and patient counseling of cochlear implant arrays.

Comparison of Speech Recognition and Hearing Preservation Outcomes Between the Mid-Scala and Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

To assess speech recognition and hearing preservation (HP) outcomes with the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala and SlimJ electrodes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 237 adult patients implanted between 2013 and 2020 (Mid-Scala, n = 136; SlimJ, n = 101).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) and AzBio (Arizona Biomedical) scores at 6 and 12 months; postoperative HP, defined as low-frequency pure-tone average ≤ 80 dB HL; scalar position.

RESULTS

Mean CNC scores did not significantly differ between Mid-Scala and SlimJ recipients at 6 (45.8% versus 46.0%, p = 0.962) and 12 (51.9% versus 48.8%, p = 0.363) months. Similarly, mean AzBio in quiet scores were equivalent for both groups at 6 (55.1% versus 59.2%, p = 0.334) and 12 (60.6% versus 62.3%, p = 0.684) months. HP rates were significantly higher with the SlimJ (48.4%) than the Mid-Scala (30.8%; p = 0.033). Scalar translocations were 34.8 and 16.1% for the Mid-Scala and SlimJ groups, respectively ( p = 0.019). Ears with postoperative HP had significantly fewer scalar translocations (16.7% versus 37.2%, p = 0.048), and postoperative HP was associated with higher AzBio in noise scores at the most recent follow-up interval (38.7% versus 25.1%, p = 0.042). CNC, AzBio in quiet and noise, low-frequency pure-tone average shifts, and PTA at 6 and 12 months were not significantly different between patients with scala tympani insertions of the SlimJ versus the Mid-Scala ( p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the Mid-Scala, the lateral wall electrode has superior HP rates and fewer scalar translocations, whereas speech recognition scores are equivalent between both electrode arrays. These findings can help providers with electrode selection and patient counseling.

A Multicenter Comparison of 1-yr Functional Outcomes and Programming Differences Between the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala and SlimJ Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in hearing outcomes or stimulation levels between Advanced Bionics straight and precurved arrays.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review across three implant centers.

SETTING

Tertiary centers for cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifteen pediatric and 205 adult cochlear implants (CIs) were reviewed. All patients were implanted under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2009 guidelines with a HiRes Ultra SlimJ or Mid-Scala electrode array.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing preservation after implantation, as well as CI-only listening scores for Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences were compared 1 year after implantation. Stimulation levels for threshold and comfort levels were also compared 1 year after implantation.

RESULTS

Hearing preservation was significantly better with the SlimJ compared with the Mid-Scala electrode array. Bamford-Kowal-Bench outcomes were not significantly different between the two arrays in any listening condition. Stimulation levels were not different between arrays but did vary across electrode contacts. At least one electrode was deactivated in 33% of implants but was more common for the SlimJ device.

CONCLUSION

Modern straight and precurved arrays from Advanced Bionics did not differ in hearing performance or current requirements. Although hearing preservation was possible with both devices, the SlimJ array would still be the preferred electrode in cases where hearing preservation was a priority. Unfortunately, the SlimJ device was also prone to poor sound perception on basal electrodes. Further investigation is needed to determine if deactivated electrodes are associated with electrode position/migration, and if programming changes are needed to optimize the use of these high-frequency channels.

Early Datalogging Predicts Cochlear Implant Performance: Building a Recommendation for Daily Device Usage

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effect of datalogging on speech recognition scores and time to achievement for a "benchmark" level of performance within the first year, and to provide a data-driven recommendation for minimum daily cochlear implant (CI) device usage to better guide patient counseling and future outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Three hundred thirty-seven adult CI patients with data logging and speech recognition outcome data who were implanted between August 2015 and August 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Processor datalogging, speech recognition scores, achievement of "benchmark speech recognition performance" defined as 80% of the median score for speech recognition outcomes at our institution.

RESULTS

The 1-month datalogging measure correlated positively with word and sentences scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postactivation. Compared with age, sex, and preoperative performance, datalogging was the largest predictive factor of benchmark achievement on multivariate analysis. Each hour/day increase of device usage at 1 month resulted in a higher likelihood of achieving benchmark consonant-nucleus-consonant and AzBio scores within the first year (odds ratio = 1.21, p < 0.001) as well as earlier benchmark achievement. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified the optimal data logging threshold at an average of 12 hours/day.

CONCLUSIONS

Early CI device usage, as measured by 1-month datalogging, predicts benchmark speech recognition achievement in adults. Datalogging is an important predictor of CI performance within the first year postimplantation. These data support the recommended daily CI processor utilization of at least 12 hours/day to achieve optimal speech recognition performance for most patients.

Effects of the Number of Channels and Channel Stimulation Rate on Speech Recognition and Sound Quality Using Precurved Electrode Arrays

PURPOSE

This study investigated the relationship between the number of active electrodes, channel stimulation rate, and their interaction on speech recognition and sound quality measures while controlling for electrode placement. Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with precurved electrode arrays placed entirely within scala tympani and closer to the modiolus were hypothesized to be able to utilize more channels and possibly higher stimulation rates to achieve better speech recognition performance and sound quality ratings than recipients in previous studies.

METHOD

Participants included seven postlingually deafened adult CI recipients with Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala electrode arrays confirmed to be entirely within scala tympani using postoperative computerized tomography. Twelve conditions were tested using four, eight, 12, and 16 electrodes and channel stimulation rates of 600 pulse per second (pps), 1,200 pps, and each participant's maximum allowable rate (1,245-4,800 pps). Measures of speech recognition and sound quality were acutely assessed.

RESULTS

For the effect of channels, results showed no significant improvements beyond eight channels for all measures. For the effect of channel stimulation rate, results showed no significant improvements with higher rates, suggesting that 600 pps was sufficient for maximum speech recognition performance and sound quality ratings. However, across all conditions, there was a significant relationship between mean electrode-to-modiolus distance and all measures, suggesting that a lower mean electrode-to-modiolus distance was correlated with higher speech recognition scores and sound quality ratings.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that even well-placed precurved electrode array recipients may not be able to take advantage of more than eight channels or higher channel stimulation rates (> 600 pps), but that closer electrode array placement to the modiolus correlates with better outcomes for these recipients.

A new paradigm of hearing loss and preservation with cochlear implants: Learnings from fundamental studies and clinical research

In 2010 Cochlear initiated a coordinated preclinical research program to identify the factors and underlying mechanisms of acoustic hearing loss following cochlear implantation and device use. At its inception the program was structured around several major hypotheses implicated in the loss of acoustic hearing. The understanding of causes evolved over the course of the program, leading to an increased appreciation of the role of the biological response in post-implant hearing loss. A systematic approach was developed which mapped the cochlear implant journey along a timeline that considers all events in an individual's hearing history. By evaluating the available data in this context, rather than by discrete hypothesis testing, causative and associated factors may be more readily detected. This approach presents opportunities for more effective research management and may aid in identifying new prospects for intervention. Many of the outcomes of the research program apply beyond preservation of acoustic hearing to factors important to overall cochlear health and considerations for future therapies.

Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation

OBJECTIVES

To determine rates of hearing preservation and performance in patients who met candidacy for electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) and were implanted with a slim modiolar electrode (CI532 or CI632).

DESIGN

Adult patients meeting Food and Drug Administration criteria for electroacoustic stimulation (preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average [LFPTA] less than 60 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz and monosyllabic word scores between 10% and 60% in the ear to be implanted), who received a slim modiolar electrode were included. Main outcome measures included rates of hearing preservation, defined as a LFPTA ≤80 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz, as well as postoperative low-frequency pure-tone threshold shifts, consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores and AzBio sentences in noise scores.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients met inclusion criteria during a 4-year period. Mean (standard deviation) preoperative LFPTA was 34.5 (13.0) dB, and 71.7% had preserved hearing at initial activation. The mean LFPTA shift in patients who preserved hearing at initial activation was 19.7 (14.6) dB, compared with 62.6 (17.7) dB in patients who did not preserve hearing as per our definition. Perioperative steroid use was not different in patients with and without preserved hearing (X 2 (1, N = 46) = 0.19, p = .67, V = 0.06). One year after surgery, 57% of patients had a decline in LFPTA >80 dB and were no longer considered candidates for EAS, with 34.7% still retaining low-frequency thresholds ≤80 dB. CNC word scores at 1 year were 69.9% and 61.4% among individuals with and without preserved low-frequency hearing respectively, measured in their CI ear alone, in their regular listening condition of EAS or electric only ( t (32) = 1.13, p = 0.27, d = 0.39, 95% CI = -6.51, 22.86). Device use time did not differ between groups. Among adults with preserved residual hearing at 1 year (n = 16), 44% used EAS, although there was no significant difference in performance between EAS users and nonusers with preserved hearing. Loss of residual hearing over time did not result in a decline in speech perception performance.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated favorable early rates of hearing preservation with a slim modiolar array. Performance was not significantly different in individuals with and without preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing, independent of EAS use. Compared with reports of short electrode use, the loss of residual hearing in patients implanted with this array did not impact speech perception performance.

Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer

OBJECTIVE

Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays have demonstrated superior audiometric outcomes compared with straight electrodes in a handful of studies. However, previous comparisons have often failed to account for preoperative hearing and age. This study compares hearing outcomes for precurved and straight electrodes by a single manufacturer while controlling for these and other factors in a large cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Two hundred thirty-one adult CI recipients between 2015 and 2021 with cochlear (Sydney, Australia) 522/622 (straight) or 532/632 (precurved) electrode arrays.

INTERVENTIONS

Postactivation speech recognition and audiometric testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech recognition testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant word [CNCw] and AzBio) was collected at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Hearing preservation was characterized by a low-frequency pure-tone average shift, or the change between preoperative and postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-one patients (253 ears) with 6-month and/or 12-month CNCw or AzBio testing were included. One hundred forty-nine (59%) and 104 (41%) ears were implanted with straight and precurved electrode arrays, respectively. Average age at implantation was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-77 y). There was no significant difference in mean age between groups. CNCw scores were significantly different ( p = 0.001) between straight (51%; IQR, 36-67%) and precurved arrays (64%; IQR, 48-72%). AzBio scores were not significantly different ( p = 0.081) between straight (72%; IQR, 51-87%) and precurved arrays (81%; IQR, 57-90%). Controlling for age, race, sex, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time, precurved electrode arrays performed significantly better on CNCw (b = 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-16.0; p < 0.001) and AzBio (b = 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16.0;, p = 0.014) testing. Hearing preservation was not different between electrodes on adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

During the study period, patients undergoing placement of precurved electrode arrays had significantly higher CNC and AzBio scores than patients receiving straight electrodes, even after controlling for age, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time.

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED

Understanding the difference in audiometric outcomes between precurved and straight electrode arrays will help to guide electrode selection.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

To understand differences in speech recognition scores postoperatively by electrode array type (precurved versus straight).

DESIRED RESULT

To demonstrate a difference in hearing performance postoperatively by electrode type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

INDICATE IRB OR IACUC

Approved by the Institutional IRB (090155).

The Relation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Type and Position on Continued Hearing Preservation

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the relationship of electrode array (EA) type and position on hearing preservation longevity following cochlear implantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adult cochlear implant recipients between 2013 and 2019 with hearing preserved postoperatively and postoperative CT scans.

INTERVENTIONS

CT scan analysis of EA position. Stepwise regression to determine influence of EA position, EA type, and patient demographics on postoperative low frequency hearing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Low frequency pure tone average (LFPTA), LFPTA shift, angular insertion depth, base insertion depth, scalar position, mean perimodiolar distance.

RESULTS

Of 792 cochlear implant recipients, 121 had preoperative LFPTA <80 dB HL with 60 of the 121 (49.6%) implanted with straight, 32 (26.4%) with precurved, styletted, and 29 (24.0%) implanted precurved, nonstyletted EA. Mean follow up was 28.6 months (range 1-103). There was no statistically significant difference in activation, 6- and 12-month, and last follow-up LFPTA (125, 250, and 500 Hz) shift based on EA type (straight p = 0.302, precurved, styletted p = 0.52, precurved, nonstyletted p = 0.77). Preoperative LFPTA and age of implantation were significant predictors of LFPTA shift at activation, accounting for 30.8% of variance ( F [2, 113] = 26.603, p < 0.0001). LFPTA shift at activation, scalar position, and base insertion depth were significant predictors of variability and accounted for 39.1% of variance in LFPTA shift at 6 months ( F [3, 87] = 20.269, p < 0.0001). Only LFPTA shift at 12 months was found to be a significant predictor of LFPTA shift at last follow up, accounting for 41.0% of variance ( F [1, 48] = 32.653, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients had excellent long-term residual hearing regardless of EA type. Age, preoperative acoustic hearing, and base insertion depth may predict short term preservation, while 12-month outcomes significantly predicted long-term hearing preservation.

Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users

HYPOTHESIS

Bilateral cochlear-implant (BI-CI) users will have a range of interaural insertion-depth mismatch because of different array placement or characteristics. Mismatch will be larger for electrodes located near the apex or outside scala tympani, or for arrays that are a mix of precurved and straight types.

BACKGROUND

Brainstem superior olivary-complex neurons are exquisitely sensitive to interaural-difference cues for sound localization. Because these neurons rely on interaurally place-of-stimulation-matched inputs, interaural insertion-depth or scalar-location differences for BI-CI users could cause interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch that impairs binaural abilities.

METHODS

Insertion depths and scalar locations were calculated from temporal-bone computed-tomography scans for 107 BI-CI users (27 Advanced Bionics, 62 Cochlear, 18 MED-EL).

RESULTS

Median interaural insertion-depth mismatch was 23.4 degrees or 1.3 mm. Mismatch in the estimated clinically relevant range expected to impair binaural processing (>75 degrees or 3 mm) occurred for 13 to 19% of electrode pairs overall, and for at least three electrode pairs for 23 to 37% of subjects. There was a significant three-way interaction between insertion depth, scalar location, and array type. Interaural insertion-depth mismatch was largest for apical electrodes, for electrode pairs in two different scala, and for arrays that were both-precurved.

CONCLUSION

Average BI-CI interaural insertion-depth mismatch was small; however, large interaural insertion-depth mismatch-with the potential to degrade spatial hearing-occurred frequently enough to warrant attention. For new BICI users, improved surgical techniques to avoid interaural insertion-depth and scalar mismatch are recommended. For existing BI-CI users with interaural insertion-depth mismatch, interaural alignment of clinical frequency tables might reduce negative spatial-hearing consequences.

Natural course of residual hearing preservation with a slim, modiolar cochlear implant electrode array

PURPOSE

Understanding residual hearing preservation and its natural course following cochlear implantation is important for developing rehabilitation strategies for hearing loss. However, non-uniform evaluation criteria and varying surgical skills pose challenges in fair comparison of the effect of different electrodes on residual hearing preservation. We compared the effect of a slim modiolar electrode (SME) and a slim straight electrode (SSE), implanted by a single surgeon, on progression of residual hearing using different parameters, based on cross-sectional and longitudinal audiological analyses.

METHODS

Patients with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) ≤85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz and who underwent minimally traumatic surgical techniques were included. The progression of residual hearing using threshold shifts, hearing preservation rate according to the HEARRING classification, and maintenance of functional low-frequency hearing potentially qualifying for a hybrid stimulation was analyzed up to five time points throughout the 1-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Threshold shifts and hearing preservation rates according to the HEARRING classification of the electrodes were comparable from 3 months through 12 months postoperatively. Maintenance of functional low-frequency hearing, required for the usage of a hybrid stimulation, was similar for both electrodes. A substantial proportion of implantees with SME use a hybrid stimulation, resulting in long-term use. However, a difference in the pattern of postoperative residual hearing preservation between the two electrodes is possible, probably due to differences in their physical characteristics and location. Specifically, correlation analysis exhibited that significantly less tight modiolar proximity negatively affect the residual hearing preservation, albeit only at 3 months postoperatively, among patients with the SME.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, both SME and SSE implantation showed favorable residual hearing preservation. Our findings further refine the recently proposed hearing preservation with the SME and suggest that the physical characteristics and location of electrodes, in terms of electrode-to-modiolus distance, could affect loss of acoustic hearing in various ways.

Molecular aetiology of ski-slope hearing loss and audiological course of cochlear implantees

PURPOSE

A challenge for patients with ski-slope hearing loss is that hearing aids do not adequately amplify the mid-to-high frequencies necessary for speech perception and conversely, cochlear implant (CI) may damage low-frequency hearing. We aimed to describe the clinical profile of patients with ski-slope hearing loss, with a special focus on aetiology of such hearing loss and audiological course of low-frequency hearing after CI.

METHODS

We recruited hearing-impaired patients who visited a tertiary referral centre and met the criteria for ski-slope hearing loss patients from 2015 to 2021. Genetic testing was performed in all ski-slope hearing loss patients unless refused. Baseline audiograms of patients who continued to use hearing aids or who finally underwent CIs were reviewed. As for CI patients, outcome and hearing preservation rate were rigorously analysed.

RESULTS

Of 46 recruited patients with ski-slope hearing loss, 45 agreed to undergo genetic testing and causative variants were identified in 17 (37.8%) patients. The TMC1, MYO7A, and TMPRSS3 variants were the most common, while LRTOMT was newly identified as a causative gene. Twenty-five patients eventually received CI, while 13 continued to wear the hearing aid and 8 patients did not ever try hearing aids. CI in ski-slope hearing loss led to immediate and sufficient improvement of sentence recognition by as early as 3 months, however, the duration of hearing loss was inversely correlated with the sentence recognition score. The average hearing preservation rate (using the HEARRING classification) after CI was 53.0% (SD 30.0) and 45.6% (SD 31.1) at 1 year. Seventy-nine percent of implantees maintained functional low-frequency hearing (better than 85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz) eligible for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). A trend was found that patients with hair cell stereocilia-associated genetic variants may have a slightly better preservation, albeit with no statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Detection rate of a molecular genetic aetiology of ski-slope hearing loss appears to be lower than other type of hearing loss reported in the literature. Especially with short hearing loss duration, CI in ski-slope hearing loss leads to immediate and sufficient speech improvement, while preserving functional low-frequency hearing eligible for EAS as many as in 79%. A certain genetic aetiology might be associated with a trend towards better low-frequency hearing preservation.

Intracochlear electrode array position and cochlear implant outcomes using the nucleus slim modiolar electrode and the extended round window approach: a follow-up study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intracochlear position of the Slim Modiolar Electrode (SME) after insertion via the extended Round Window (eRW) approach, and to correlate this with residual hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-three adult participants, consecutively implanted with the SME via the eRW approach, were included in this prospective, single-center, observational study. Electrode position was evaluated intra-operatively using X-ray fluoroscopy and TIM measurement, and post-operatively using ultra-high resolution CT. Residual hearing [threshold shift in PTA between pre- and post-operative measurement, relative hearing preservation (RHP%)] and speech perception were evaluated at 2 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

In each of the 23 participants, complete scala tympani positioning of the electrode array could be achieved. In one participant, an initial tip fold-over was corrected during surgery. Average age at implantation was 63.3 years (SD 13.3, range 28-76) and mean preoperative residual hearing was 81.5 dB. The average post-operative PTA threshold shift was 16.2 dB (SD 10.8) at 2 months post-operatively, corresponding with a RHP% score of 44% (SD 34.9). At 12 months, the average RHP% score decreased to 37%. Postoperative phoneme scores improved from 27.1% preoperatively, to 72.1% and 82.1% at 2 and 12 months after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Use of the eRW approach results in an increased likelihood of complete scala tympani insertion when inserting the SME, with subsequent excellent levels of speech perception. However, residual hearing preservation was found to be moderate, possibly as a result of the extended round window approach, emphasizing that it is not an all-purpose approach for inserting this particular electrode array.

Tight modiolar proximity and feasibility of slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode array insertion in diverse etiologies of hearing loss

PURPOSE

To report on our experience with the slim modiolar electrode (SME) especially focusing on the wide range of etiologies including inner ear anomalies, tumors, ossifications, and even revision surgeries.

METHODS

All the cochlear implantation cases performed from June 2018 to September 2019 by a single surgeon was prospectively recruited. The molecular/radiological etiology of hearing loss, intraoperative outcomes, and radiographic studies of cases where the SME was implanted was reviewed to evaluate compatibility of SME for the wide range of etiologies. For cases where SME replaced the other electrode as a revision, audiologic assessment was also made.

RESULTS

Among the 99 ears implanted during the study period, the SME was successfully implanted in 86 ears. These SME cases comprised inner ear anomaly/cochear nerve deficiency (n = 21) including cochlear hypoplasia type IV with the modiolus, intracochlear schwannoma (n = 1), far advanced otosclerosis (n = 1) and 7 revision cases. The SME was successfully used in 7 revision surgeries to replace the existing electrode. Shorter spiral diameter and decreased intracochlear position index for SME was found compared with their previous electrodes. Four out of the 6 patients who received revision implantation showed better speech perception after their surgeries.

CONCLUSION

The SME can be implanted in any cases unless the integrity of the modiolus is totally compromised. Due to its slim design and tight modiolar-hugging feature, good functional outcome can also be anticipated. Additionally, it is suitable for revision surgeries possibly allowing better hearing outcomes which may be attributed to its closer proximity to the modiolus.

Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Slim Straight and Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

To compare differences in audiologic outcomes between slim modiolar electrode (SME) CI532 and slim lateral wall electrode (SLW) CI522 cochlear implant recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital.

METHODS

Comparison of postoperative AzBio sentence scores in quiet (percentage correct) in adult cochlear implant recipients with SME or SLW matched for preoperative AzBio sentence scores in quiet and aided and unaided pure tone average.

RESULTS

Patients with SLW (n = 52) and patients with SME (n = 37) had a similar mean (SD) age (62.0 [18.2] vs 62.6 [14.6] years, respectively), mean preoperative aided pure tone average (55.9 [20.4] vs 58.1 [16.4] dB; P = .59), and mean AzBio score (percentage correct, 11.1% [13.3%] vs 8.0% [11.5%]; P = .25). At last follow-up (SLW vs SME, 9.0 [2.9] vs 9.9 [2.6] months), postoperative mean AzBio scores in quiet were not significantly different (percentage correct, 70.8% [21.3%] vs 65.6% [24.5%]; P = .29), and data log usage was similar (12.9 [4.0] vs 11.3 [4.1] hours; P = .07). In patients with preoperative AzBio <10% correct, the 6-month mean AzBio scores were significantly better with SLW than SME (percentage correct, 70.6% [22.9%] vs 53.9% [30.3%]; P = .02). The intraoperative tip rollover rate was 8% for SME and 0% for SLW.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implantation with SLW and SME provides comparable improvement in audiologic functioning. SME does not exhibit superior speech recognition outcomes when compared with SLW.

Factors Influencing Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The primary objective of this study is to identify the biographic, audiologic, and electrode position factors that influence speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a device from a single manufacturer. The secondary objective is to investigate the independent association of the type of electrode (precurved or straight) with speech perception.

Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception

The slim modiolar electrode has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than previous conventional perimodiolar electrodes and consistently high scala tympani localization. Nonetheless, variability in modiolar proximity exists even among slim modiolar electrodes, still leaving room for further improvement of modiolar proximity, which may positively affect functional outcomes. Given this, the pull-back maneuver was reported to increase the modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes in a cadaveric study, but in vivo repositioning effects remain to be established. Here we identified that the pull-back maneuver led to better modiolar proximity than conventional insertion while maintaining a similar angular insertion depth. Notably, the reduced electrode-modiolus distance from the pull-back maneuver was associated with significantly lower impedances across electrodes postoperatively as well as reduced intraoperative electrophysiological thresholds than conventional insertion. Among adult cochlear implant recipients, this maneuver resulted in significantly better sentence recognition scores at three months postoperatively when compared to those with a conventional insertion; however, this benefit was not observed at later intervals. Collectively, slim modiolar electrodes with the pull-back maneuver further enhance the modiolar proximity, possibly leading to better open-set sentence recognition, at least in the early postoperative stage.

On the Intracochlear Location of Straight Electrode Arrays After Cochlear Implantation: How Lateral Are Lateral Wall Electrodes?

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implants are the gold standard for patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss. A focused electrical stimulation of individual spiral ganglion neurons has not been achieved yet because the scala tympani is a fluid-filled compartment and does not offer a matrix for neuritic outgrowth. Coating of the electrode contacts with swelling hydrogels could fill that gap between the electrode array and the medial wall of the cochlea. Therefore, the exact position of the electrode array within the scala tympani has to be known.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of patient data sets.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center. A total of 95 patients with cochlear implants from one manufacturer were included in this study. The lateral wall, the modiolar wall, and the cochlear implant electrode were segmented using OsiriX MD. For repositioning and reconstructing the respective contours and measuring distances, files were analyzed in MATLAB. The distances from the edge of each electrode contact to the cochlear walls showed no significant differences. But between the different contacts within each patient, there were significant differences. Around 180 degree insertion, electrodes start to get in contact with the lateral wall. The tip of the electrode array was always facing toward the modiolar wall independent of the length of the electrode. We established a method to analyze the position of electrodes within the cochlea.

The Effect of Ultra-slow Velocities on Insertion Forces: A Study Using a Highly Flexible Straight Electrode Array

OBJECTIVE

The present study sought to 1) characterize insertion forces resulting from a flexible straight electrode array (EA) inserted at slow and ultra-slow insertion velocities, and 2) evaluate if ultra-slow velocities decrease insertion forces independent of other variables.

BACKGROUND

Low insertion forces are desirable in cochlear implant (CI) surgery to reduce trauma and preserve hearing. Recently, ultra-slow insertion velocities (lower than manually feasible) have been shown to produce significantly lower insertion forces using other EAs.

METHODS

Five flexible straight EAs were used to record insertion forces into an inelastic artificial scala tympani model. Eleven trial recordings were performed for each EA at five predetermined automated, continuous insertion velocities ranging from 0.03 to 1.6 mm/s.

RESULTS

An ultra-slow insertion velocity of 0.03 mm/s resulted in a median insertion force of 0.010 N at 20 mm of insertion depth, and 0.026 N at 24.3 mm-the final insertion depth. These forces represent only 24 to 29% of those measured using 1.6 mm/s. After controlling for insertion depth of the EA into the artificial scala tympani model and trial insertion number, decreasing the insertion velocity from 0.4 to 0.03 mm/s resulted in a 50% decrease in the insertion forces.

CONCLUSION

Using the tested EA ultra-slow velocities can decrease insertion forces, independent of variables like insertion depth. Our results suggest ultra-slow velocities can reduce insertion forces at least 60%, compared with humanly feasible continuous velocities (≥0.9 mm/s).

Reduced Spread of Electric Field After Surgical Removal of Intracochlear Schwannoma and Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of the study was to explore whether reduced spread of electrical field is observed after partial or subtotal cochleoectomy and cochlear implantation compared with standard cochlear implantation. Secondarily, the influence on speech perception was explored comparing both groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonconcurrent cohort study.

SETTING

Monocentric study at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Twenty adult cochlear implant (CI) users after tumor resection with cochleoectomy of varying extent and 20 electrode-matched CI users with standard electrode insertion.

INTERVENTIONS

Partial and subtotal cochleoectomy for tumor removal and CI.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Trans-impedance, electrically evoked compound action potentials, and word recognition were measured. Relative impedance was computed as a function of distance between the stimulation and recording electrode.

RESULTS

Trans-impedance was smaller and more homogeneous in patients with partial or subtotal cochleoectomy than in the control group. In the tumor group, the mean relative impedance decreased to 0.20 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.03) at a distance of 1 electrode and to 0.25 (SD = 0.04) in the control group. After excluding seven patients with a second tumor in the internal auditory canal or cerebellopontine angle, with transmodiolar tumors, after near total cochleoectomy, or only extended cochleostomy, word recognition was 61% (SD = 19%) at 3 months and 75% (SD = 19%) at 12 months after activation of the audio processor in the tumor group. At 12 months, it was significantly (p < 0.05) better than in the control group (3 mo: 45%, SD = 25%; 12 mo: 53%, SD = 26%). A smaller trans-impedance is associated with a better word recognition.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the surgical technique used for CI surgery after subtotal cochleoectomy reduces the spread of the electric field and overcomes the potential drawbacks in structure preservation associated with that technique.

Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode

PURPOSE

Numerous endeavors have been undertaken to preserve hearing in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Particularly, optimization of electrode array design aims at preservation of residual hearing (RH). This study examines whether a slim perimodiolar (PM) electrode array could bear the capability to preserve hearing.

METHODS

A total of 47 patients underwent cochlear implantation receiving the PM electrode. (i) Patients with pure tone audiogram (PTA) thresholds better than 85 dB and/or hearing loss for Freiburg speech test numbers less than 60 dB and more than 50% maximum monosyllabic understanding were assigned to the RH group (n = 17), while all others belonged to the noRH group (n = 30). (ii) Another group implanted with a slim straight, lateral wall (LW) electrode was recruited for comparison.

RESULTS

We compared 17 RH-30 noRH patients all receiving the PM electrode. RH in PM recipients decreased faster than in LW recipients. No significant differences were observed between both (RH v/s noRH) groups in NRT thresholds, Freiburg speech test and A§E^® phonemes. Analogous satisfaction levels were indicated through the questionnaires in terms of sound quality, hearing in silence, noise and directional hearing in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that hearing preservation is influenced not only by electrode shape but various factors. This study opens an avenue for further investigations to elucidate and enumerate the causes for progressive hearing loss.

Assessment of Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Tablet-Based Software to Measure Cochlear Duct Length

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to build upon previous work validating a tablet-based software to measure cochlear duct length (CDL). Here, we do so by greatly expanding the number of cochleae (n = 166) analyzed, and examined whether computed tomography (CT) slice thickness influences reliability of CDL measurements.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Eighty-three adult cochlear implant recipients were included in the study. Both cochleae were measured for each patient (n = 166).

INTERVENTIONS

Three raters analyzed the scans of 166 cochleae at 2 different time points. Each rater individually identified anatomical landmarks that delineated the basal turn diameter and width. These coordinates were applied to the elliptic approximation method (ECA) to estimate CDL. The effect of CT scan slice thickness on the measurements was explored.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure is the strength of the inter- and intra-rater reliability.

RESULTS

The mean CDL measured was 32.84 ± 2.03 mm, with a range of 29.03 to 38.07 mm. We observed no significant relationship between slice thickness and CDL measurement (F1,164 = 3.04; p = 0.08). The mean absolute difference in CDL estimations between raters was 1.76 ± 1.24 mm and within raters was 0.263 ± 0.200 mm. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between raters was 0.54 and ranged from 0.63 to 0.83 within raters.

CONCLUSIONS

This software produces reliable measurements of CDL between and within raters, regardless of CT scan thickness.

Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate speech understanding outcomes in a large adult cohort who demonstrated poor hearing performance with well fit hearing aids in the unilateral and bilateral or bimodal listening conditions at preimplant, 3-, 6- and 12-months.

SUBJECTS

Post-linguistically deafened adults (N = 100) with bilateral moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss and limited functional benefit from well fit bilateral hearing aids.

METHOD

A multicenter, prospective, repeated-measures, within-subject controlled study was conducted. All subjects were implanted with a Slim Modiolar cochlear implant and were required to use bimodal stimulation (cochlear implant and hearing aid in contralateral ear) for 6-months postimplant and optionally to 12-months. Evaluations included: speech recognition for monosyllabic consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet; AzBio sentences in coincident noise (at +5 and +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)), in implant ear and bimodal conditions. All speech tests were performed at preimplant and 6-months postimplant for primary endpoint outcomes, and a subset of speech tests at 3- and 12-months.

RESULTS

In the implant ear only, at 3-, 6- and 12-months postimplant, 84%, 93% and 97% of subjects respectively, demonstrated significantly improved monosyllabic word scores in quiet compared to preimplant hearing aid scores (p < 0.05). At 12-months, a mean gain of 51% points, for monosyllabic words and 32% points for sentences in noise was observed (p < 0.001). In the bimodal condition, at 6-months postimplant, 87% of subjects demonstrated significantly improved monosyllabic word scores in quiet compared to preimplant bilateral hearing aid scores (p < 0.05). At 6-months, a mean gain of 40% points, for monosyllabic words was observed (p < 0.001). Speech scores for sentences in noise significantly improved for the bimodal condition at 6- and 12-months (p < 0.001). In addition to speech scores for the implanted ear, bimodal condition scores demonstrated further increments, especially for sentences in noise at 6- and 12-months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Results support that bimodal hearing is superior to bilateral hearing aids in this cohort of bilateral moderate-to-profound adult hearing aid users. Our study cohort demonstrated significant improvements for speech scores for the cochlear implant (CI) ear only and bimodal conditions compared to the baseline preimplant unilateral and bilateral hearing aid conditions respectively. The greatest gain in performance was in the first three months of device use with incremental improvement through 12 months. These findings indicate that when hearing aids fit to National Acoustics Laboratory (NAL-1) targets do not provide the necessary audibility needed for speech recognition, referral for CI-candidacy evaluation is strongly recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clintrial.govNCT03007472. Registered 01/02/2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03007472?term=clinical+evaluation+of+the+nucleus+CI532&draw=2&rank=2.

Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode

A new slim modiolar electrode (CI532/632) has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than conventional electrodes. Better modiolar proximity has been proposed to yield better electrode discrimination capability and potentially better speech outcomes, necessitating its efficient measurement. Currently, intracochlear positional index (ICPI), the most reliable indicator for evaluating modiolar proximity, has been measured exclusively through ‘metal artifact-less’ cone beam CT. However, popular use of this index is precluded due to lack of cone beam CT in many institutions. Thus, eyes are now on elucidation of easy-to-measure indicators of modiolar proximity derived from conventional CT, which is accessible in all centers. We observed that enhanced tomographic resolution significantly reduces partial volume artifacts, providing better visualization of modiolus-electrode distance. Aided by ultra-high kernel specification with high-resolution index, we developed a novel and easy-to-measure, conventional CT-specific indicator, “modified ICPI”, for evaluation of modiolar proximity. Further, we showed that it closely correlates with the previously proposed parameter of modiolar proximity, the spiral diameter, measured from post-insertion radiograph, reiterating the value of X-ray-based spiral diameter. Through this study, we have taken a step toward the stage of immediate visual feedback regarding modiolar proximity and changes in insertion technique intraoperatively, ensuring optimal modiolar proximity.

Modiolar Proximity of Slim Modiolar Electrodes and Cochlear Duct Length: Correlation for Potential Basis of Customized Cochlear Implantation With Perimodiolar Electrodes

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have shown that cochlear duct length (CDL) varies among individuals and could significantly influence the final position of the electrode and its trajectory in the cochlea. Given this, we hypothesized that the degree of modiolar proximity of novel slim modiolar electrodes, such as CI532 and CI632, can also be affected by CDL. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively evaluated individual CDL to determine if there is any significant correlation of CDL with degree of modiolar proximity.

METHODS

Fifty-one ears from 38 subjects implanted with slim modiolar electrodes by a single surgeon through the round window approach using the pull-back technique were included. Our cohort was classified according to the deafness onset (congenital versus postlingual) and the degree of modiolar proximity (less versus tight) with reference to the spiral diameter made by the slim modiolar electrodes in situ on transorbital x ray. We then analyzed the CDL and its metrics using a readily available surgical preplanning tool (OTOPLAN) to obtain comparable data.

RESULTS

Among 30 ears associated with congenital deafness, 9 ears (30%) showed less modiolar proximity, while none of the 21 ears from 19 subjects with postlingual deafness exhibited "less modiolar proximity" based on our criteria. In this study, CDL showed significant variation among subjects. Importantly, a significant inverse correlation between spiral diameter and CDL (ρ = -0.581, p < 0.001) was found, showing that shorter CDLs have longer spiral diameter and less modiolar proximity. Moreover, further pull-back technique characterized by pulling out the electrode a little bit more in cases with shorter CDL, if not always, exhibited tighter modiolar proximity.

CONCLUSION

A preponderance of less modiolar proximity of the electrode was observed exclusively among congenital deafness cases, demonstrated by a less tight spiral configuration even under the pull-back technique. Our data suggest that shorter CDL is associated with a less tight spiral configuration of slim modiolar electrodes postoperatively. Depending on the insertion technique, the differential degree of modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes can be alleviated in cases with short CDL, which justifies cochlear duct length-based customized insertion of slim modiolar electrodes.

Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant

PURPOSE

Hearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores.

METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.