A Case Series of Patients With Concurrent Otosclerosis and Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

Toward Automating Diagnosis of Middle- and Inner-ear Mechanical Pathologies With a Wideband Absorbance Regression Model

OBJECTIVES

During an initial diagnostic assessment of an ear with normal otoscopic exam, it can be difficult to determine the specific pathology if there is a mechanical lesion. The audiogram can inform of a conductive hearing loss but not the underlying cause. For example, audiograms can be similar between the inner-ear condition superior canal dehiscence (SCD) and the middle-ear lesion stapes fixation (SF), despite differences in pathologies and sites of lesion. To gain mechanical information, wideband tympanometry (WBT) can be easily performed noninvasively. Absorbance , the most common WBT metric, is related to the absorbed sound energy and can provide information about specific mechanical pathologies. However, absorbance measurements are challenging to analyze and interpret. This study develops a prototype classification method to automate diagnostic estimates. Three predictive models are considered: one to identify ears with SCD versus SF, another to identify SCD versus normal, and finally, a three-way classification model to differentiate among SCD, SF, and normal ears.

DESIGN

Absorbance was measured in ears with SCD and SF as well as normal ears at both tympanometric peak pressure (TPP) and 0 daPa. Characteristic impedance was estimated by two methods: the conventional method (based on a constant ear-canal area) and the surge method, which estimates ear-canal area acoustically.Classification models using multivariate logistic regression predicted the probability of each condition. To quantify expected performance, the condition with the highest probability was selected as the likely diagnosis. Model features included: absorbance-only, air-bone gap (ABG)-only, and absorbance+ABG. Absorbance was transformed into principal components of absorbance to reduce the dimensionality of the data and avoid collinearity. To minimize overfitting, regularization, controlled by a parameter lambda, was introduced into the regression. Average ABG across multiple frequencies was a single feature.Model performance was optimized by adjusting the number of principal components, the magnitude of lambda, and the frequencies included in the ABG average. Finally, model performances using absorbance at TPP versus 0 daPa, and using the surge method versus constant ear-canal area were compared. To estimate model performance on a population unknown by the model, the regression model was repeatedly trained on 70% of the data and validated on the remaining 30%. Cross-validation with randomized training/validation splits was repeated 1000 times.

RESULTS

The model differentiating between SCD and SF based on absorbance-only feature resulted in sensitivities of 77% for SCD and 82% for SF. Combining absorbance+ABG improved sensitivities to 96% and 97%. Differentiating between SCD and normal using absorbance-only provided SCD sensitivity of 40%, which improved to 89% by absorbance+ABG. A three-way model using absorbance-only correctly classified 31% of SCD, 20% of SF and 81% of normal ears. Absorbance+ABG improved sensitivities to 82% for SCD, 97% for SF and 98% for normal. In general, classification performance was better using absorbance at TPP than at 0 daPa.

CONCLUSION

The combination of wideband absorbance and ABG as features for a multivariate logistic regression model can provide good diagnostic estimates for mechanical ear pathologies at initial assessment. Such diagnostic automation can enable faster workup and increase efficiency of resources.

Surgical decision-making in superior canal dehiscence syndrome with concomitant otosclerosis

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis and management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SCDS) with concomitant otosclerosis can be a challenge. Otosclerosis can mask SCDS symptoms and stapes surgery may reveal or exacerbate vestibular symptoms. Our aim is to present four cases of SCDS with concomitant otosclerosis and thereby informing the reader about the possibility of this dual occurrence and its implications for treatment.

CASES

Four patients with SCDS and concomitant otosclerosis are presented. Two patients underwent surgical treatment for both SCDS and otosclerosis and two patients opted for conservative management.

OUTCOMES

The main differences between surgically and non-surgically treated cases are the presence of autophony and pressure-induced vertigo and a more severe experience of symptoms in surgically treated cases. Surgically treated cases achieved a sizeable reduction in postoperative air-bone gap and resolution of vestibular symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The subjective severity of symptoms in combination with shared decision-making is key in determining the appropriate treatment plan for SCDS and concomitant otosclerosis.

Preoperative Evaluation of Otosclerosis: A National Survey of Otologists

OBJECTIVE

Describe practice patterns in preoperative assessment for stapedectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Survey.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

SUBJECTS

Active members of the American Neurotologic Society and American Otologic Society.

INTERVENTION

Survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percent of respondents performing preoperative testing with acoustic reflexes (ARs), electrocochleography, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and computed tomography (CT). Further analysis of those not ordering routine CT to determine whether imaging would be ordered for previous ear surgery, vestibular complaints, childhood hearing loss, AR inconsistent with otosclerosis, possible advanced otosclerosis, or atypical complaints, including autophony. Further subgroup analysis based on years in practice and practice setting (private versus academic).

RESULTS

Most respondents (56.5%) had practiced more than 15 years and worked in academic settings (69.4%). Rates of routine use of preoperative AR, vestibular evoked myogenic potential, and electrocochleography were 80, 4.7, and 0%, respectively. There were no significant differences based on time in practice or practice settings. For CT, 35.3% reported routine use with a statistically significant difference between academic and private practice respondents (42.4% versus 19.2%, p = 0.040). For CT contingent on specific clinical factors, only AR inconsistent with otosclerosis showed a statistically significant difference between academic and private practice providers (85.3% versus 57.1%, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Most otologists routinely obtain AR before stapedectomy. Academic providers more commonly order CT routinely and for AR inconsistent with otosclerosis. Most respondents not ordering routine CT ordered imaging in specific clinical scenarios. Overall, there is a high level of consistency in preoperative testing regardless of practice setting or time in practice.

Role of HRCT Temporal Bone in Predicting Surgical Difficulties Encountered in Fenestral Otosclerosis Surgery

To study spectrum of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) imaging findings in otosclerosis, to predict approximate length of prosthesis required from pre-operative HRCT measurements and to correlate between oval window niche (OWN) height preoperatively and difficulty in introducing foot plate perforator during surgery. A cross sectional study was conducted on 23 patients with a clinical diagnosis of otosclerosis from September 2018 to July 2020. Sensitivity of HRCT in detecting otosclerosis, correlation between pre-operative incudo-stapedial length (ISL) and intra operative prosthesis length, and correlation between OWN height and difficulty in introducing perforator were sought. The mean age of 23 patients studied was 39.9 years with a female preponderance of 56.5%. 17 out of 19 patients with foci of otosclerosis during surgery had HRCT findings of otosclerosis providing a sensitivity of 89.5%. Mean OWN height obtained was 1.29 mm preoperatively and a cut off value of 1.325 mm found using receiver operating characteristic curve method classifying OWN height as narrow or normal. Mean ISL measured pre operatively was 4.25 mm and mean length of prosthesis used was 4.56 mm with significant positive correlation using intraclass correlation coefficient method with correlation coefficient = 0.879. HRCT is an invaluable modality aiding the surgeon to detect otosclerotic foci with high sensitivity, identify thick obliterative otosclerotic foci requiring additional drilling, to predict the length of prosthesis used and to predict difficulties in approaching footplate when OWN height is below 1.325 mm.

Incidence of Concomitant Semicircular Canal Dehiscence With Otosclerosis

Objective

The concurrence of otosclerosis and superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) presents a diagnostic challenge and failure to differentiate between these 2 diagnoses results in mischaracterization and unsuccessful surgery. The objective of this study is to identify the incidence of SSCD in patients who have computed tomography (CT) evidence of otosclerosis.

Study Design

Retrospective chart review.

Setting

Tertiary referral hospital.

Patients

Adults with CT scan of the temporal bone diagnosed with radiological unilateral or bilateral fenestral otosclerosis from January 1995 to April 2018.

Methods

Retrospective review of patient imaging from a multi-center tertiary-referral health system from January 1995 to April 2018. Imaging was reviewed to quantify the incidence of SSCD among patients with CT-diagnosed bilateral fenestral otosclerosis. Poor quality imaging was excluded from review.

Results

One-thousand two-hundred eight patients (1214 CT scans) were identified with otosclerosis, of which 373 were diagnosed with fenestral otosclerosis (663 ears) with imaging of sufficient quality for review. This population was predominantly female (57.2%) with bilateral fenestral otosclerosis (78%). Of these, 23 ears (3.5%) had definitive evidence of SSCD, with an additional 15 ears (2.3%) with possible radiographic evidence of SSCD. There was no significant difference in laterality between the SSCD and otosclerosis.

Conclusions

Among 373 patients with fenestral otosclerosis per CT temporal bone imaging at a tertiary referral hospital, as many as 8.3% of patients had radiographic evidence of SSCD. Given this incidence, it continues to be important to consider SSCD when diagnosing and treating otosclerosis.

Outcomes of Stapedotomy in Patients with Concomitant Otosclerosis and Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence: Should a Radiographic Third-Window Be a Contraindication to Stapes Surgery?

OBJECTIVE

Review surgical outcomes of stapedotomy in patients with concomitant otosclerosis and superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients with otosclerosis and radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence undergoing stapedotomy between 2008 and 2020.

INTERVENTION

Stapedotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pre- and postoperative hearing and unmasking of third-window symptoms. Hearing was measured by air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC) pure-tone averages (PTA), air-bone gap (ABG), and word recognition scores (WRS). Third-window symptoms included hyperacusis, autophony, sound- or pressure-induced vertigo, imbalance, or oscillopsia.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with otosclerosis and radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence underwent stapedotomy, 13 primary and 7 revision. Mean AC PTA was 49.3 dB preoperatively and 35.6 dB postoperatively (p = 0.0077), while the ABG improved on average from 23.9 to 9.68 dB (p < 0.0001). The ABG improved to ≤10 dB in 12/20 patients (60%), and ≤20 dB in 18/20 patients (90%). There was no significant difference in BC PTA or WRS postoperatively. Two patients (10%) experienced potential transient unmasking of third-window symptoms-hyperacusis and prolonged imbalance-which both resolved. There were no other complications. There was no significant difference in audiologic outcomes or unmasking of third window symptoms between primary or revision cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent conductive hearing loss is common following stapedotomy for otosclerosis in patients with concomitant superior semicircular canal dehiscence. However, a majority of patients can achieve excellent hearing outcomes, while unmasking of third window symptoms appears to be rare. Radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence may not be an absolute contraindication to stapes surgery for otosclerosis.

Dural Contact to the Malleus Head in Patients with Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SSCD): Case Series and Review of SSCD and Tegmen Defects

OBJECTIVE

Report a series of cases in which patients have concomitant superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) and a dehiscent tegmen tympani with Dural contact to the malleus head (DCMH).

METHODS

An analysis of radiologic and audiologic data in 4 patients who presented with SSCD and DCMH at a tertiary care institution. A pertinent literature review was performed.

RESULTS

Four patients (5 ears) had SSCD and DCMH. In 3 patients with unilateral DCMH, the mean maximum air-bone gap was 15 dB in the ear with DCMH compared to 50 dB in the ear without DCMH. Of the 5 ears with DCMH, the mean air conduction threshold at 250 Hz was 17 dB compared to 42 dB in the 3 ears without DCMH.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the findings of DCMH in a series of 4 patients with bilateral SSCD. This limited series suggests that ears with SSCD and DCMH have less of an air-bone gap than would be expected, as 1 would expect an additive effect of DCMH and SSCD on the air-bone gap.

Current Trends, Controversies, and Future Directions in the Evaluation and Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

Patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) can present with a range of auditory and/or vestibular signs and symptoms that are associated with a bony defect of the superior semicircular canal (SSC). Over the past two decades, advances in diagnostic techniques have raised the awareness of SCDS and treatment approaches have been refined to improve patient outcomes. However, a number of challenges remain. First, there is currently no standardized clinical testing algorithm for quantifying the effects of superior canal dehiscence (SCD). SCDS mimics a number of common otologic disorders and established metrics such as supranormal bone conduction thresholds and vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements; although useful in certain cases, have diagnostic limitations. Second, while high-resolution computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the detection of SCD, a bony defect does not always result in signs and symptoms. Third, even when SCD repair is indicated, there is a lack of consensus about nomenclature to describe the SCD, ideal surgical approach, specific repair techniques, and type of materials used. Finally, there is no established algorithm in evaluation of SCDS patients who fail primary repair and may be candidates for revision surgery. Herein, we will discuss both contemporary and emerging diagnostic approaches for patients with SCDS and highlight challenges and controversies in the management of this unique patient cohort.