Are Opioids Necessary in Middle Ear Surgery? Comparing the Transcanal and Postauricular Approach

Opioid Prescribing Patterns Following Lateral Skull Base Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repair

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the opioid prescribing patterns for and requirements of patients undergoing repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (sCSF) leaks of the lateral skull base.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adults with lateral skull base sCSF leaks who underwent repairs between September 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Mean morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) of opioids dispensed to inpatients and prescribed at discharge, additional pain control medications dispensed, and outpatient additional opioid requests were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of 78 patients included, 46 (59%) underwent repair via a transmastoid (TM), 6 (7.7%) via a middle cranial fossa (MCF), and 26 (33.3%) via a combined TM-MCF approach. Inpatients received a mean of 21.3, 31.4, and 37.6 MMEs per day during admission for the TM, MCF, and combined TM-MCF approaches, respectively ( p = 0.019, ηp 2 = 0.101). Upon discharge, nearly all patients (n = 74, 94.9%) received opioids; 27.3, 32.5, and 37.6 MMEs per day were prescribed after the TM, MCF, and TM-MCF approaches, respectively ( p = 0.015, ηp 2 = 0.093). Five (6.4%) patients requested additional outpatient pain medication, after which three were prescribed 36.7 MMEs per day. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension required significantly more inpatient MMEs than those without (41.5 versus 25.2, p = 0.02, d = 0.689), as did patients with a history of headaches (39.6 versus 23.6, p = 0.042, d = 0.684).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing sCSF leak repair via the MCF or TM-MCF approaches are prescribed more opioids postoperatively than patients undergoing the TM approach. Patients with a history of headaches or idiopathic intracranial hypertension might require more opioids postoperatively.

Postoperative pain after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery: A systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

Transcanal endoscopic ear surgery is hypothesized to result in less postoperative pain when compared to nonendoscopic techniques due to its minimally invasive nature. In this systematic literature review, we aim to summarize and evaluate the evidence surrounding postoperative pain control and analgesic utilization after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery.

DATABASES REVIEWED

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using standardized methodology. Computerized and manual searches were performed to identify studies that evaluated postoperative pain outcomes following endoscopic ear surgery. Only studies that met predetermined criteria were selected and evaluated for quality and bias. Extracted data included demographics, pain scores, analgesic administered as well as the diagnosis and type of surgery undertaken. Exclusion criteria included letters/commentaries and reviews, lack of pain outcome data and studies not concerning endoscopic ear surgery.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review included 24 studies. Seven were RCTs, 10 were prospective and 7 were retrospective observational studies. A total of 1859 patients were evaluated for surgical approach and postoperative pain levels and analgesic use. Due to the lack of sufficient reporting of the data, a meta-analysis was not applicable. In the qualitative synthesis for the primary outcome, weighted pooled analysis showed that there was a slight reduction in postoperative pain after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery. Based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool, the quality for the finding is low.

CONCLUSION

There is a small reduction in postoperative pain after transcanal endoscopic ear surgery when compared to nonendoscopic approaches, however, the clinical significance of this reduction is unclear. The evidence was from studies of only low to moderate quality.

Pain and Pain Control With Opioid and Nonopioid Medications After Otologic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively analyze pain and pain medication use following otologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study with patient reported pain logs and medication use logs.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital.Patients: Sixty adults who underwent outpatient otologic surgeries.

INTERVENTIONS

Surveys detailing postoperative pain levels, nonopioid analgesic (NOA) use, and opioid analgesic use.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported pain scores, use of NOA, and use of opioid medications normalized as milligrams morphine equivalents (MME).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients had surgery via a transcanal (TC) approach, and 28 patients had surgery via a postauricular (PA) approach. TC surgery had significantly lower reported pain scores than PA surgery on both postoperative day (POD) 1 (median pain score 2.2, IQR 0-5 vs. median pain score 4.8, IQR 3.4-6.3, respectively; p = 0.0013) and at POD5 (median pain score 0, IQR 0-0 vs. median pain score 2.0, IQR 0-3, respectively; p = 0.0002). Patients also used significantly fewer opioid medications with TC approach than patients who underwent PA approach at POD1 (median total MME 0, IQR 0-5 vs. median total MME 5.0, IQR 0-15, respectively; p = 0.03) and at POD5 (median total MME 0, IQR 0-0 vs. median total MME 0, IQR 0-5, respectively; p = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery with a postauricular approach is associated with higher pain and opioid use following otologic surgery. Patient- and approach-specific opioid prescribing is feasible following otologic surgery.

Variants and Modifications of the Retroauricular Approach Using in Temporomandibular Joint Surgery: A Systematic Review

Introduction: The retroauricular approach (RA) has been developed in order to expose the temporomandibular joint in a way that minimizes the risk of injury to the facial nerve and masks the postoperative scar. One of its characteristics is an excellent posterolateral view of the mandibular head, which allows for the preservation of the lateral temporomandibular joint ligaments in the course of open intracapsular surgery. Aim: The aim of this study is to systematically review the currently used variants and modifications of RA. Materials and Methods: The construction of the following study is based on PICOS and PRISMA protocols. A systematic literature search was performed based on the PubMed and BASE search engines; furthermore the authors performed a more detailed search in the Google Scholar article database as well as a loop search within the references of papers included in the systematic review. Results: Searching medical articles databases, Google Scholar, and references yielded a total of 85 records. First the titles and abstracts were blindly screened which was followed by a full-text eligibility check resulting in eventually including and qualifying 7 articles for detailed analysis. Discussion: All known variants and modifications of RA are characterized by high safety for the facial nerve and an aesthetically hidden scar. There were no reports of auricle necrosis in the collected material. Conclusions: In this systematic review, 2 variants and 2 modifications of RA that allow for open temporomandibular joint surgery have been identified; all of them together cover a large spectrum of indications for joint surgery, including reposition and osteosynthesis of mandibular head fractures, eminoplasty, or eminectomy and treatment of some forms of ankylosis.