Outcome and Toxicity of Proton Therapy for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Cohort Study

Cochlear-optimized treatment planning in photon and proton radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma patients

Objective

To investigate the potential to reduce the cochlear dose with robotic photon radiosurgery or intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for vestibular schwannomas.

Materials and Methods

Clinically delivered photon radiosurgery treatment plans were compared to five cochlear-optimized plans: one photon and four proton plans (total of 120). A 1x12 Gy dose was prescribed. Photon plans were generated with Precision (Cyberknife, Accuray) with no PTV margin for set-up errors. Proton plans were generated using an in-house automated multi-criterial planning system with three or nine-beam arrangements, and applying 0 or 3 mm robustness for set-up errors during plan optimization and evaluation (and 3 % range robustness). The sample size was calculated based on a reduction of cochlear Dmean > 1.5 Gy(RBE) from the clinical plans, and resulted in 24 patients.

Results

Compared to the clinical photon plans, a reduction of cochlear Dmean > 1.5 Gy(RBE) could be achieved in 11/24 cochlear-optimized photon plans, 4/24 and 6/24 cochlear-optimized proton plans without set-up robustness for three and nine-beam arrangement, respectively, and in 0/24 proton plans with set-up robustness. The cochlea could best be spared in cases with a distance between tumor and cochlea. Using nine proton beams resulted in a reduced dose to most organs at risk.

Conclusion

Cochlear dose reduction is possible in vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery while maintaining tumor coverage, especially when the tumor is not adjacent to the cochlea. With current set-up robustness, proton therapy is capable of providing lower dose to organs at risk located distant to the tumor, but not for organs adjacent to it. Consequently, photon plans provided better cochlear sparing than proton plans.

The Course of Hearing Loss in Patients With a Progressive Vestibular Schwannoma

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the natural course of hearing loss (HL) prior to treatment in patients with progressive tumors and an indication for active intervention. Evaluating this patient group specifically can put hearing outcomes after vestibular schwannoma therapy into an adequate context.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria comprised unilateral vestibular schwannomas prior to active treatment, with ≥2 mm extracanalicular (EC) tumor growth and ≥2 audiograms. We performed a comprehensive assessment of hearing using multiple outcome parameters including (the annual decrease in) pure-tone averages (PTAs; an average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz). Predictors for HL were evaluated (patient age, tumor size/progression, follow-up duration, baseline hearing).

RESULTS

At presentation, 86% of patients suffered from sensorineural HL on the affected side (≥20 dB PTA) with a median of 39 dB (interquartile rate [IQR]: 27-51 dB). The median follow-up duration was 21 months (IQR: 13-34 months), after which 58% (187/322) of patients experienced progressive HL (≥10 dB), with a median increase of 6.4 dB/year. At the last follow-up, the median PTA was 56 dB (IQR: 37-73). Median speech discrimination scores deteriorated from 90% (IQR: 70%-100%) to 65% (IQR: 35%-100%). Tumor progression (maximal EC diameter) was significantly correlated to the progression of sensorineural HL, corrected for follow-up (F(2,228) = 10.4, p < .001, R2  = 8%).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients (58%) with radiologically confirmed progressive vestibular schwannomas experience progressive sensorineural HL during observation. Tumor progression rate, EC tumor extension, and longer follow-up are factors associated with more sensorineural HL.

Proton beam radiation therapy for vestibular schwannomas-tumor control and hearing preservation rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of proton beam for VSs, evaluating tumor control and cranial nerve preservation rates, particularly with regard to facial and hearing preservation.

METHODS

We reviewed, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) articles published between 1968 and September 30, 2022. We retained 8 studies reporting 587 patients.

RESULTS

Overall rate of tumor control (both stability and decrease in volume) was 95.4% (range 93.5-97.2%, p heterogeneity= 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of tumor progression was 4.6% (range 2.8-6.5%, p heterogeneity < 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of trigeminal nerve preservation (absence of numbness) was 95.6% (range 93.5-97.7%, I2 = 11.44%, p heterogeneity= 0.34, p<0.001). Overall rate of facial nerve preservation was 93.7% (range 89.6-97.7%, I2 = 76.27%, p heterogeneity<0.001, p<0.001). Overall rate of hearing preservation was 40.6% (range 29.4-51.8%, I2 = 43.36%, p heterogeneity= 0.1, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Proton beam therapy for VSs achieves high tumor control rates, as high as 95.4%. Facial rate preservation overall rates are 93%, which is lower compared to the most SRS series. Compared with most currently reported SRS techniques, proton beam radiation therapy for VSs does not offer an advantage for facial and hearing preservation compared to most of the currently reported SRS series.

Proton Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannomas in Patients with NF2-Related Schwannomatosis: A Case Series

(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and treatment-related toxicity of proton radiotherapy (PRT) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis (NF2). (2) Methods: Consecutive NF2 patients treated with PRT for VS between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated, focusing on tumor volume, facial and trigeminal nerve function, hearing, tinnitus, vestibular symptoms, and the need for salvage therapy after PRT. (3) Results: Eight patients were included (median age 36 years, 50% female). Median follow-up was 71 months. Five (63%) patients received fractionated PRT and three (38%) received PRT radiosurgery for VS. Six patients (75%) received prior VS surgery; three also received bevacizumab. Six patients (75%) did not require salvage therapy after PRT. Two patients (25%) with residual hearing lost it after PRT, and six had already lost ipsilateral hearing prior to PRT. Tumor and treatment-related morbidity could be evaluated in six patients. Following PRT, conditions that occurred or worsened were: facial paresis in five (83%), trigeminal hypoesthesia in two (33%), tinnitus in two (33%), and vestibular symptoms in four patients (67%). (4) Conclusion: After PRT for VS, the majority of the NF2 patients in the cohort did not require additional therapy. Tumor and/or treatment-related cranial nerve deficits were common. This is at least partly explained by the use of PRT as a salvage treatment after surgery or bevacizumab, in the majority of cases. There remains the further opportunity to elucidate the efficacy and toxicity of proton radiotherapy as a primary treatment.

Labyrinthine Fluid Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas Undergoing Proton Radiotherapy: A Longitudinal Assessment

OBJECTIVE

In vestibular schwannoma patients, a loss of signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported within the ipsilateral labyrinth. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the occurrence and course of this intensity loss in relation to proton radiotherapy and its possible association with hearing loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients who received proton therapy for a vestibular schwannoma and underwent at least two high-resolution T2-weighted cisternographic sequence (constructive interference in steady state/fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition/DRIVE) MRIs and audiometry assessments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relative T2 SIs from the vestibules and basal/apical cochlear turns of the labyrinth, bilaterally.

RESULTS

Ninety-five MRI scans from 34 patients were included. The apical turn of the ipsilateral cochlea showed a lower mean cochlear SI than on the contralateral side (±3.5 versus 5.0). The mean relative cochlear SI did not significantly change after proton radiotherapy. The ipsilateral vestibule showed a higher SI than the cochlea. The relative mean cochlear SI was not directly correlated to (the degree of) hearing loss before or after proton radiotherapy, nor did it predict future hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

The relative mean cochlear SI on cisternographic T2-MRI in vestibular schwannoma patients is diminished on the treated side, when compared with the ipsilateral vestibule and the contralateral cochlea/vestibule. The SI of the ipsilateral cochlea does not further decrease after proton radiotherapy and seems to be related to the tumor rather than the therapy. The diminished cochlear SI does not correlate with subsequent loss of hearing.

Outcome after Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannomas (VS)—Differences in Tumor Control, Symptoms and Quality of Life after Radiotherapy with Photon versus Proton Therapy

Background: To evaluate differences in local tumor control (LC), symptoms and quality of life (QOL) of 261 patients with VS after stereotactic radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/HFSRT) vs. fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) vs. fractionated proton therapy (FPT) were studied. Methods: For SRS/HFSRT (n = 149), the median fraction dose applied was 12 Gy. For FRT (n = 87) and FPT (n = 25), the median cumulative doses applied were 57.6 Gy and 54 Gy (RBE), respectively. FRT and FPT used single median doses of 1.8 Gy/Gy (RBE). Median follow-up was 38 months. We investigated dosimetry for organs at risk and analyzed toxicity and QOL by sending out a questionnaire. Results: LC was 99.5% at 12 months after RT with no statistical difference between treatment groups (p = 0.19). LC was significantly lower in NF2 patients (p = 0.004) and in patients with higher tumor extension grade (p = 0.039). The hearing preservation rate was 97% at 12 months after RT with no statistical difference between treatment groups (p = 0.31). Facial and trigeminal nerve affection after RT occurred as mild symptoms with highest toxicity rate in FPT patients. Conclusion: SRS/HFSRT, FRT and FPT for VS show similar overall clinical and functional outcomes. Cranial nerve impairment rates vary, potentially due to selection bias with larger VS in the FRT and FPT group.