1
|
Aronoff JM, Soleimanifar S, Bk P. Temporal pitch matching with bilateral cochlear implants. JASA EXPRESS LETTERS 2024; 4:044401. [PMID: 38558234 PMCID: PMC10989667 DOI: 10.1121/10.0025507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Interaural pitch matching is a common task used with bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users, although studies measuring this have largely focused on place-based pitch matches. Temporal-based pitch also plays an important role in CI users' perception, but interaural temporal-based pitch matching has not been well characterized for CI users. To investigate this, bilateral CI users were asked to match amplitude modulation frequencies of stimulation across ears. Comparisons were made to previous place-based pitch matching data that were collected using similar procedures. The results indicate that temporal-based pitch matching is particularly sensitive to the choice of reference ear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Aronoff
- Speech and Hearing Science Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 South 6th Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820, , ,
| | - Simin Soleimanifar
- Speech and Hearing Science Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 South 6th Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820, , ,
| | - Prajna Bk
- Speech and Hearing Science Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 South 6th Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820, , ,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kashani RG, Kocharyan A, Bennion DM, Scheperle RA, Etler C, Oleson J, Dunn CC, Claussen AD, Gantz BJ, Hansen MR. Combining Intraoperative Electrocochleography with Robotics-Assisted Electrode Array Insertion. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:143-149. [PMID: 38206061 PMCID: PMC10786337 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the use of robotics-assisted electrode array (EA) insertion combined with intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG) in hearing preservation cochlear implant surgery. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, single-arm, open-label study. SETTING All procedures and data collection were performed at a single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Twenty-one postlingually deaf adult subjects meeting Food and Drug Administration indication criteria for cochlear implantation with residual acoustic hearing defined as thresholds no worse than 65 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz. INTERVENTION All patients underwent standard-of-care unilateral cochlear implant surgery using a single-use robotics-assisted EA insertion device and concurrent intraoperative ECochG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postoperative pure-tone average over 125, 250, and 500 Hz measured at initial activation and subsequent intervals up to 1 year afterward. RESULTS Twenty-two EAs were implanted with a single-use robotics-assisted insertion device and simultaneous intraoperative ECochG. Fine control over robotic insertion kinetics could be applied in response to changes in ECochG signal. Patients had stable pure-tone averages after activation with normal impedance and neural telemetry responses. CONCLUSIONS Combining robotics-assisted EA insertion with intraoperative ECochG is a feasible technique when performing hearing preservation implant surgery. This combined approach may provide the surgeon a means to overcome the limitations of manual insertion and respond to cochlear feedback in real-time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rustin G. Kashani
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Armine Kocharyan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Douglas M. Bennion
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Rachel A. Scheperle
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Christine Etler
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Jacob Oleson
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Camille C. Dunn
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Alexander D. Claussen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Bruce J. Gantz
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Marlan R. Hansen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shim H, Kim S, Hong J, Na Y, Woo J, Hansen M, Gantz B, Choi I. Differences in neural encoding of speech in noise between cochlear implant users with and without preserved acoustic hearing. Hear Res 2023; 427:108649. [PMID: 36462377 PMCID: PMC9842477 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) have evolved to combine residual acoustic hearing with electric hearing. It has been expected that CI users with residual acoustic hearing experience better speech-in-noise perception than CI-only listeners because preserved acoustic cues aid unmasking speech from background noise. This study sought neural substrate of better speech unmasking in CI users with preserved acoustic hearing compared to those with lower degree of acoustic hearing. Cortical evoked responses to speech in multi-talker babble noise were compared between 29 Hybrid (i.e., electric acoustic stimulation or EAS) and 29 electric-only CI users. The amplitude ratio of evoked responses to speech and noise, or internal SNR, was significantly larger in the CI users with EAS. This result indicates that CI users with better residual acoustic hearing exhibit enhanced unmasking of speech from background noise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwan Shim
- Dept. Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, United States
| | - Subong Kim
- Dept. Communication Sciences and Disorders, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, United States
| | - Jean Hong
- Dept. Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States
| | - Youngmin Na
- Dept. Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States
| | - Jihwan Woo
- Dept. Biomedical Engineering, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Marlan Hansen
- Dept. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States
| | - Bruce Gantz
- Dept. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States
| | - Inyong Choi
- Dept. Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States; Dept. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aljazeeri I, Hamed N, Abdelsamad Y, Sharif T, Al-Momani M, Hagr A. Anatomy-Based Frequency Allocation in Cochlear Implantation: The Importance of Cochlear Coverage. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:2224-2231. [PMID: 34967457 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS This study aimed to compare the predicted anatomy-based frequency allocation of cochlear implant electrodes with the default standard frequencies. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed using computed tomography (CT) images of patients who received cochlear implants at a tertiary referral center. Patients were excluded if they had any congenital or acquired cochlear anatomical anomalies. The CT images of the patients were uploaded to the surgical planning software. Two independent reviewers allocated the anatomical parameters of the cochlea. The software then used these parameters to calculate the frequency allocation for each electrode according to the type of electrode and the length of the organ of Corti (OC) in each patient. These anatomy-based frequency allocations were compared with the default frequency settings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Frequency-to-place mismatch in semitones. RESULTS A total of 169 implanted ears in 102 patients were included in this study. The readings of the two reviewers were homogenous, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.98. The mean anatomy-based frequency allocation was 487.3 ± 202.9 Hz in electrode 1; 9,298.6 ± 490.6 Hz in electrode 12. The anatomy-based frequency allocations were found to be significantly higher than the frequencies of the default frequencies for each corresponding electrode (one-sample t-test, P < .001). The frequency-to-place mismatch was negatively correlated with cochlear coverage and positively correlated with the cochlear duct length (Pearson correlation > 0.65, P < .003). CONCLUSIONS The anatomy-based frequency allocation of each electrode is significantly different from the default frequency setting. This frequency-to-place mismatch was affected mainly by the cochlear coverage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isra Aljazeeri
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Aljaber Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Specialized Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nezar Hamed
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Tahir Sharif
- Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Murad Al-Momani
- ENT Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McGuire K, Firestone GM, Zhang N, Zhang F. The Acoustic Change Complex in Response to Frequency Changes and Its Correlation to Cochlear Implant Speech Outcomes. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:757254. [PMID: 34744668 PMCID: PMC8566680 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.757254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the biggest challenges that face cochlear implant (CI) users is the highly variable hearing outcomes of implantation across patients. Since speech perception requires the detection of various dynamic changes in acoustic features (e.g., frequency, intensity, timing) in speech sounds, it is critical to examine the ability to detect the within-stimulus acoustic changes in CI users. The primary objective of this study was to examine the auditory event-related potential (ERP) evoked by the within-stimulus frequency changes (F-changes), one type of the acoustic change complex (ACC), in adult CI users, and its correlation to speech outcomes. Twenty-one adult CI users (29 individual CI ears) were tested with psychoacoustic frequency change detection tasks, speech tests including the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word recognition, Arizona Biomedical Sentence Recognition in quiet and noise (AzBio-Q and AzBio-N), and the Digit-in-Noise (DIN) tests, and electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. The stimuli for the psychoacoustic tests and EEG recordings were pure tones at three different base frequencies (0.25, 1, and 4 kHz) that contained a F-change at the midpoint of the tone. Results showed that the frequency change detection threshold (FCDT), ACC N1' latency, and P2' latency did not differ across frequencies (p > 0.05). ACC N1'-P2 amplitude was significantly larger for 0.25 kHz than for other base frequencies (p < 0.05). The mean N1' latency across three base frequencies was negatively correlated with CNC word recognition (r = -0.40, p < 0.05) and CNC phoneme (r = -0.40, p < 0.05), and positively correlated with mean FCDT (r = 0.46, p < 0.05). The P2' latency was positively correlated with DIN (r = 0.47, p < 0.05) and mean FCDT (r = 0.47, p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between N1'-P2' amplitude and speech outcomes (all ps > 0.05). Results of this study indicated that variability in CI speech outcomes assessed with the CNC, AzBio-Q, and DIN tests can be partially explained (approximately 16-21%) by the variability of cortical sensory encoding of F-changes reflected by the ACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelli McGuire
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Gabrielle M. Firestone
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Nanhua Zhang
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Fawen Zhang
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carlyon RP, Goehring T. Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2021; 22:481-508. [PMID: 34432222 PMCID: PMC8476711 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00811-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) are the world's most successful sensory prosthesis and have been the subject of intense research and development in recent decades. We critically review the progress in CI research, and its success in improving patient outcomes, from the turn of the century to the present day. The review focuses on the processing, stimulation, and audiological methods that have been used to try to improve speech perception by human CI listeners, and on fundamental new insights in the response of the auditory system to electrical stimulation. The introduction of directional microphones and of new noise reduction and pre-processing algorithms has produced robust and sometimes substantial improvements. Novel speech-processing algorithms, the use of current-focusing methods, and individualised (patient-by-patient) deactivation of subsets of electrodes have produced more modest improvements. We argue that incremental advances have and will continue to be made, that collectively these may substantially improve patient outcomes, but that the modest size of each individual advance will require greater attention to experimental design and power. We also briefly discuss the potential and limitations of promising technologies that are currently being developed in animal models, and suggest strategies for researchers to collectively maximise the potential of CIs to improve hearing in a wide range of listening situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | - Tobias Goehring
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, O'Connell BP. Comparison of Speech Recognition With an Organ of Corti Versus Spiral Ganglion Frequency-to-Place Function in Place-Based Mapping of Cochlear Implant and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:721-725. [PMID: 33625196 PMCID: PMC8935664 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare acute speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) alone or electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device for place-based maps calculated with an organ of Corti (OC) versus a spiral ganglion (SG) frequency-to-place function. PATIENTS Eleven adult CI recipients of a lateral wall electrode array. INTERVENTION Postoperative imaging was used to derive place-based maps calculated with an OC versus SG function. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Phoneme recognition was evaluated at initial activation with consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words presented using an OC versus a SG place-based map. RESULTS For the 9 CI-alone users, there was a nonsignificant trend for better acute phoneme recognition with the SG map (mean 18 RAUs) than the OC map (mean 9 RAUs; p = 0.071, 95% CI [≤-1.2]). When including the 2 EAS users in the analysis, performance was significantly better with the SG map (mean 21 RAUs) than the OC map (mean 7 RAUs; p = 0.019, 95% CI [≤-6.2]). CONCLUSIONS Better phoneme recognition with the SG frequency-to-place function could indicate more natural tonotopic alignment of information compared with the OC place-based map.A prospective, randomized investigation is currently underway to assess longitudinal outcomes with place-based mapping in CI-alone and EAS devices using the SG frequency-to-place function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
- Division of Speech & Hearing, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Currently, bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) are independently programmed in clinics using frequency allocations based on the relative location of a given electrode from the end of each electrode array. By pairing electrodes based on this method, bilateral CI recipients may have decreased sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITD) and/or interaural level differences (ILD), two cues critical for binaural tasks. There are multiple different binaural measures that can potentially be used to determine the optimal way to pair electrodes across the ears. Previous studies suggest that the optimal electrode pairing between the left and right ears may vary depending on the binaural task used. These studies, however, have only used one reference location or a single bilateral CI user. In both instances, it is difficult to determine if the results that were obtained reflect a measurement error or a systematic difference across binaural tasks. It is also difficult to determine from these studies if the differences between the three cues vary across electrode regions, which could result from differences in the availability of binaural cues across frequency regions. The purpose of this study was to determine if, after experience-dependent adaptation, there are systematic differences in the optimal pairing of electrodes at different points along the array for the optimal perception of ITD, ILD, and pitch. DESIGN Data from seven bilateral Nucleus users was collected and analyzed. Participants were tested with ITD, ILD, and pitch-matching tasks using five different reference electrodes in one ear, spaced across the array. Comparisons were conducted to determine if the optimal bilateral electrode pairs systematically differed in different regions depending on whether they were measured based on ITD sensitivity, ILD sensitivity, or pitch matching, and how those pairs differed from the pairing in the participants' clinical programs. RESULTS Results indicate that there was a significant difference in the optimal pairing depending on the cue measured, but only at the basal end of the array. CONCLUSION The results suggest that optimal electrode pairings differ depending on the cue measured to determine optimal pairing, at least for the basal end of the array. This also suggests that the improvements seen when using optimally paired electrodes may be tied to the particular percept being measured both to determine electrode pairing and to assess performance, at least for the basal end of the array.
Collapse
|
9
|
Karoui C, James C, Barone P, Bakhos D, Marx M, Macherey O. Searching for the Sound of a Cochlear Implant: Evaluation of Different Vocoder Parameters by Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness. Trends Hear 2020; 23:2331216519866029. [PMID: 31533581 PMCID: PMC6753516 DOI: 10.1177/2331216519866029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation in subjects with single-sided deafness (SSD) offers a unique opportunity to directly compare the percepts evoked by a cochlear implant (CI) with those evoked acoustically. Here, nine SSD-CI users performed a forced-choice task evaluating the similarity of speech processed by their CI with speech processed by several vocoders presented to their healthy ear. In each trial, subjects heard two intervals: their CI followed by a certain vocoder in Interval 1 and their CI followed by a different vocoder in Interval 2. The vocoders differed either (i) in carrier type-(sinusoidal [SINE], bandfiltered noise [NOISE], and pulse-spreading harmonic complex) or (ii) in frequency mismatch between the analysis and synthesis frequency ranges-(no mismatch, and two frequency-mismatched conditions of 2 and 4 equivalent rectangular bandwidths [ERBs]). Subjects had to state in which of the two intervals the CI and vocoder sounds were more similar. Despite a large intersubject variability, the PSHC vocoder was judged significantly more similar to the CI than SINE or NOISE vocoders. Furthermore, the No-mismatch and 2-ERB mismatch vocoders were judged significantly more similar to the CI than the 4-ERB mismatch vocoder. The mismatch data were also interpreted by comparing spiral ganglion characteristic frequencies with electrode contact positions determined from postoperative computed tomography scans. Only one subject demonstrated a pattern of preference consistent with adaptation to the CI sound processor frequency-to-electrode allocation table and two subjects showed possible partial adaptation. Those subjects with adaptation patterns presented overall small and consistent frequency mismatches across their electrode arrays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadlia Karoui
- Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Cochlear France SAS, Toulouse, France
| | - Chris James
- Cochlear France SAS, Toulouse, France.,Department of Otology-Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascal Barone
- Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France
| | - David Bakhos
- Université François-Rabelais de Tours, CHRU de Tours, France.,Ear Nose and Throat department, CHUR de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Mathieu Marx
- Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.,Department of Otology-Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Olivier Macherey
- Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, LMA, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dillon MT, Buss E, Rooth MA, King ER, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD. Low-Frequency Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2019; 62:2860-2871. [PMID: 31306588 DOI: 10.1044/2019_jslhr-h-18-0409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Three experiments were carried out to evaluate the low-frequency pitch perception of adults with unilateral hearing loss who received a cochlear implant (CI). Method Participants were recruited from a cohort of CI users with unilateral hearing loss and normal hearing in the contralateral ear. First, low-frequency pitch perception was assessed for the 5 most apical electrodes at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after CI activation using an adaptive pitch-matching task. Participants listened with a coding strategy that presents low-frequency temporal fine structure (TFS) and compared the pitch to that of an acoustic target presented to the normal hearing ear. Next, participants listened with an envelope-only, continuous interleaved sampling strategy. Pitch perception was compared between coding strategies to assess the influence of TFS cues on low-frequency pitch perception. Finally, participants completed a vocal pitch-matching task to corroborate the results obtained with the adaptive pitch-matching task. Results Pitch matches roughly corresponded to electrode center frequencies (CFs) in the CI map. Adaptive pitch matches exceeded the CF for the most apical electrode, an effect that was larger for continuous interleaved sampling than TFS. Vocal pitch matches were variable but correlated with the CF of the 3 most apical electrodes. There was no evidence that pitch matches changed between the 1- and 12-month intervals. Conclusions Relatively accurate and asymptotic pitch perception was observed at the 1-month interval, indicating either very rapid acclimatization or the provision of familiar place and rate cues. Early availability of appropriate pitch cues could have played a role in the early improvements in localization and masked speech recognition previously observed in this cohort. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8862389.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Meredith A Rooth
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - English R King
- Department of Audiology, UNC Healthcare, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Harold C Pillsbury
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pitch Matching Adapts Even for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Relatively Small Initial Pitch Differences Across the Ears. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2019; 20:595-603. [PMID: 31385149 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-019-00733-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
There is often a mismatch for bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users between the electrodes in the two ears that receive the same frequency allocation and the electrodes that, when stimulated, yield the same pitch. Studies with CI users who have extreme mismatches between the two ears show that adaptation occurs in terms of pitch matching, reducing the difference between which electrodes receive the same frequency allocation and which ones produce the same pitch. The considerable adaptation that occurs for these extreme cases suggests that adaptation should be sufficient to overcome the relatively minor mismatches seen with typical bilateral CI users. However, even those with many years of bilateral CI use continue to demonstrate a mismatch. This may indicate that adaptation only occurs when there are large mismatches. Alternatively, it may indicate that adaptation occurs regardless of the magnitude of the mismatch, but that adaptation is proportional to the magnitude of the mismatch, and thus never fully counters the original mismatch. To investigate this, six bilateral CI users with initial pitch-matching mismatches of less than 3 mm completed a pitch-matching task near the time of activation, 6 months after activation, and 1 year after activation. Despite relatively small initial mismatches, the results indicated that adaptation still occurred.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Two Electrode Lengths in Infants With Profound Deafness. Otol Neurotol 2019; 40:e267-e276. [PMID: 30741906 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000002124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this investigation was to determine if a short electrode in one ear and standard electrode in the contralateral ear could be an option for infants with congenital profound deafness to theoretically preserve the structures of the inner ear. Similarities in performance between ears and compared with a control group of infants implanted with bilateral standard electrodes was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN Repeated-measure, single-subject experiment. SETTING University of Iowa-Department of Otolaryngology. PARTICIPANTS Nine infants with congenital profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. INTERVENTION(S) Short and standard implants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Early speech perception test (ESP), children's vowel, phonetically balanced-kindergarten (PB-K) word test, and preschool language scales-3 (PLS-3). RESULTS ESP scores showed performance reaching a ceiling effect for the individual short and standard ears and bilaterally. The children's vowel and PB-K word results indicated significant (both p < 0.001) differences between the two ears. Bilateral comparisons to age-matched children with standard bilateral electrodes showed no significant differences (p = 0.321) in performance. Global language performance for six children demonstrated standard scores around 1 standard deviation (SD) of the mean. Two children showed scores below the mean, but can be attributed to inconsistent device usage. Averaged total language scores between groups showed no difference in performance (p = 0.293). CONCLUSIONS The combined use of a short electrode and standard electrode might provide an option for implantation with the goal of preserving the cochlear anatomy. However, further studies are needed to understand why some children have or do not have symmetric performance.
Collapse
|
13
|
Yu F, Li H, Zhou X, Tang X, Galvin III JJ, Fu QJ, Yuan W. Effects of Training on Lateralization for Simulations of Cochlear Implants and Single-Sided Deafness. Front Hum Neurosci 2018; 12:287. [PMID: 30065641 PMCID: PMC6056606 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
While cochlear implantation has benefitted many patients with single-sided deafness (SSD), there is great variability in cochlear implant (CI) outcomes and binaural performance remains poorer than that of normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Differences in sound quality across ears-temporal fine structure (TFS) information with acoustic hearing vs. coarse spectro-temporal envelope information with electric hearing-may limit integration of acoustic and electric patterns. Binaural performance may also be limited by inter-aural mismatch between the acoustic input frequency and the place of stimulation in the cochlea. SSD CI patients must learn to accommodate these differences between acoustic and electric stimulation to maximize binaural performance. It is possible that training may increase and/or accelerate accommodation and further improve binaural performance. In this study, we evaluated lateralization training in NH subjects listening to broad simulations of SSD CI signal processing. A 16-channel vocoder was used to simulate the coarse spectro-temporal cues available with electric hearing; the degree of inter-aural mismatch was varied by adjusting the simulated insertion depth (SID) to be 25 mm (SID25), 22 mm (SID22) and 19 mm (SID19) from the base of the cochlea. Lateralization was measured using headphones and head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). Baseline lateralization was measured for unprocessed speech (UN) delivered to the left ear to simulate SSD and for binaural performance with the acoustic ear combined with the 16-channel vocoders (UN+SID25, UN+SID22 and UN+SID19). After completing baseline measurements, subjects completed six lateralization training exercises with the UN+SID22 condition, after which performance was re-measured for all baseline conditions. Post-training performance was significantly better than baseline for all conditions (p < 0.05 in all cases), with no significant difference in training benefits among conditions. Given that there was no significant difference between the SSD and the SSD CI conditions before or after training, the results suggest that NH listeners were unable to integrate TFS and coarse spectro-temporal cues across ears for lateralization, and that inter-aural mismatch played a secondary role at best. While lateralization training may benefit SSD CI patients, the training may largely improve spectral analysis with the acoustic ear alone, rather than improve integration of acoustic and electric hearing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Yu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Hai Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaoqing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - XiaoLin Tang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | | | - Qian-Jie Fu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wei Yuan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A preliminary study to identify a neurophysiological correlate of electroacoustic pitch matching in cochlear implant users. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2018; 2017:1162-1165. [PMID: 29060081 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2017.8037036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
One challenge facing postlingually-deafened cochlear implant (CI) users is the frequency mismatch between the incoming acoustic signal and the characteristic frequency of the electrically stimulated neurons. Current CI is an open-loop system and it requires extensive fine-tuning to help users to adapt to this mismatch over time. Electric-acoustic pitch matching in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) participants who has residual hearing in the non-implanted ear had been shown to serve as a useful metric to monitor adaptation process. The goal of this study was to identify a potential neurophysiological correlate to this electroacoustic pitch matching for a possible metric to track the adaptation process of CI users over time and a possible feedback for a closed-loop CI system design. This study utilized a method of presenting electrical and acoustic stimuli that were continuously alternating across ears. The stimuli were either matched or mismatched in pitch. Auditory Evoked Potentials (AEP) were recorded from 10 CI users and 10 normal hearing (NH) participants. For NH participants, an acoustic tone at a fixed frequency was presented in place of electrical stimulation. Results with CI participants indicated that N1 latency decreases when the acoustic frequency of the tone presented in the non-implanted ear increases. More importantly, there was an additional shortening of N1 latency in the pitch matched condition. These two patterns were repeated with NH participants. These results indicate the potential utility of N1 latency as an index of pitch matching in both normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant user.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tan CT, Martin BA, Svirsky MA. A potential neurophysiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in adult cochlear implant users: Pilot data. Cochlear Implants Int 2018; 19:198-209. [PMID: 29508662 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1442126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
The overall goal of this study was to identify an objective physiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in unilaterally implanted cochlear implant (CI) participants with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear. Electrical and acoustic stimuli were presented in a continuously alternating fashion across ears. The acoustic stimulus and the electrical stimulus were either matched or mismatched in pitch. Auditory evoked potentials were obtained from nine CI users. Results indicated that N1 latency was stimulus-dependent, decreasing when the acoustic frequency of the tone presented to the non-implanted ear was increased. More importantly, there was an additional decrease in N1 latency in the pitch-matched condition. These results indicate the potential utility of N1 latency as an index of pitch matching in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Tuan Tan
- a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Behavioral and Brain Science (Callier Center for Communication Disorders) , University of Texas at Dallas , Richardson , TX , USA.,b Program in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences and Program in Audiology, Graduate Center , City University of New York , New York , NY , USA
| | - Brett A Martin
- b Program in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences and Program in Audiology, Graduate Center , City University of New York , New York , NY , USA
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- c Department of Otolaryngology , New York University , New York , NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tan CT, Martin B, Svirsky MA. Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 2018; 28:187-199. [PMID: 28277210 DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochlear implants (CIs) successfully restore hearing in postlingually deaf adults, but in doing so impose a frequency-position function in the cochlea that may differ from the physiological one. PURPOSE The CI-imposed frequency-position function is determined by the frequency allocation table programmed into the listener's speech processor and by the location of the electrode array along the cochlea. To what extent can postlingually deaf CI users successfully adapt to the difference between physiological and CI-imposed frequency-position functions? RESEARCH DESIGN We attempt to answer the question by combining behavioral measures of electroacoustic pitch matching (PM) and measures of electrode location within the cochlea. STUDY SAMPLE The participants in this study were 16 adult CI users with residual hearing who could match the pitch of acoustic pure tones presented to their unimplanted ears to the pitch resulting from stimulation of different CI electrodes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We obtained data for four to eight apical electrodes from 16 participants with CIs (most of whom were long-term users), and estimated electrode insertion angle for 12 of these participants. PM functions in this group were compared with the two frequency-position functions discussed above. RESULTS Taken together, the findings were consistent with the possibility that adaptation to the frequency-position function imposed by CIs does happen, but it is not always complete. CONCLUSIONS Some electrodes continue to be perceived as higher pitched than the acoustic frequencies with which they are associated despite years of listening experience after cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Tuan Tan
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Brett Martin
- Speech and Hearing Sciences, Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness. Ear Hear 2018; 37:248-59. [PMID: 27116049 PMCID: PMC4847646 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study used vocoder simulations with normal-hearing (NH) listeners to (1) measure their ability to integrate speech information from an NH ear and a simulated cochlear implant (CI), and (2) investigate whether binaural integration is disrupted by a mismatch in the delivery of spectral information between the ears arising from a misalignment in the mapping of frequency to place. DESIGN Eight NH volunteers participated in the study and listened to sentences embedded in background noise via headphones. Stimuli presented to the left ear were unprocessed. Stimuli presented to the right ear (referred to as the CI-simulation ear) were processed using an eight-channel noise vocoder with one of the three processing strategies. An Ideal strategy simulated a frequency-to-place map across all channels that matched the delivery of spectral information between the ears. A Realistic strategy created a misalignment in the mapping of frequency to place in the CI-simulation ear where the size of the mismatch between the ears varied across channels. Finally, a Shifted strategy imposed a similar degree of misalignment in all channels, resulting in consistent mismatch between the ears across frequency. The ability to report key words in sentences was assessed under monaural and binaural listening conditions and at signal to noise ratios (SNRs) established by estimating speech-reception thresholds in each ear alone. The SNRs ensured that the monaural performance of the left ear never exceeded that of the CI-simulation ear. The advantages of binaural integration were calculated by comparing binaural performance with monaural performance using the CI-simulation ear alone. Thus, these advantages reflected the additional use of the experimentally constrained left ear and were not attributable to better-ear listening. RESULTS Binaural performance was as accurate as, or more accurate than, monaural performance with the CI-simulation ear alone. When both ears supported a similar level of monaural performance (50%), binaural integration advantages were found regardless of whether a mismatch was simulated or not. When the CI-simulation ear supported a superior level of monaural performance (71%), evidence of binaural integration was absent when a mismatch was simulated using both the Realistic and the Ideal processing strategies. This absence of integration could not be accounted for by ceiling effects or by changes in SNR. CONCLUSIONS If generalizable to unilaterally deaf CI users, the results of the current simulation study would suggest that benefits to speech perception in noise can be obtained by integrating information from an implanted ear and an NH ear. A mismatch in the delivery of spectral information between the ears due to a misalignment in the mapping of frequency to place may disrupt binaural integration in situations where both ears cannot support a similar level of monaural speech understanding. Previous studies that have measured the speech perception of unilaterally deaf individuals after CI but with nonindividualized frequency-to-electrode allocations may therefore have underestimated the potential benefits of providing binaural hearing. However, it remains unclear whether the size and nature of the potential incremental benefits from individualized allocations are sufficient to justify the time and resources required to derive them based on cochlear imaging or pitch-matching tasks.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ehlers E, Goupell MJ, Zheng Y, Godar SP, Litovsky RY. Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2017; 141:4264. [PMID: 28618809 PMCID: PMC5464955 DOI: 10.1121/1.4983824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Revised: 05/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Children who are deaf and receive bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) perform better on spatial hearing tasks using bilateral rather than unilateral inputs; however, they underperform relative to normal-hearing (NH) peers. This gap in performance is multi-factorial, including the inability of speech processors to reliably deliver binaural cues. Although much is known regarding binaural sensitivity of adults with BiCIs, less is known about how the development of binaural sensitivity in children with BiCIs compared to NH children. Sixteen children (ages 9-17 years) were tested using synchronized research processors. Interaural time differences and interaural level differences (ITDs and ILDs, respectively) were presented to pairs of pitch-matched electrodes. Stimuli were 300-ms, 100-pulses-per-second, constant-amplitude pulse trains. In the first and second experiments, discrimination of interaural cues (either ITDs or ILDs) was measured using a two-interval left/right task. In the third experiment, subjects reported the perceived intracranial position of ITDs and ILDs in a lateralization task. All children demonstrated sensitivity to ILDs, possibly due to monaural level cues. Children who were born deaf had weak or absent sensitivity to ITDs; in contrast, ITD sensitivity was noted in children with previous exposure to acoustic hearing. Therefore, factors such as auditory deprivation, in particular, lack of early exposure to consistent timing differences between the ears, may delay the maturation of binaural circuits and cause insensitivity to binaural differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Ehlers
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Waisman Center, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Matthew J Goupell
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
| | - Yi Zheng
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
| | - Shelly P Godar
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Waisman Center, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Ruth Y Litovsky
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Waisman Center, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kim JR, Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Intracochlear Recordings of Acoustically and Electrically Evoked Potentials in Nucleus Hybrid L24 Cochlear Implant Users and Their Relationship to Speech Perception. Front Neurosci 2017; 11:216. [PMID: 28469553 PMCID: PMC5395645 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The Hybrid cochlear implant (CI) has been developed for individuals with high frequency hearing loss who retain good low frequency hearing. Outcomes have been encouraging but individual variability is high; the health of the cochlea and the auditory nerve may be important factors driving outcomes. Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) reflect the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation while electrocochleography (ECochG) reflects the response of the cochlear hair cells and auditory nerve to acoustic stimulation. In this study both ECAPs and ECochG responses were recorded from Nucleus Hybrid L24 CI users. Correlations between these two measures of peripheral auditory function and speech perception are reported. This retrospective study includes data from 25 L24 CI users. ECAPs and ECochG responses were recorded from an intracochlear electrode using stimuli presented at or near maximum acceptable loudness levels. Speech perception was assessed using Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word lists presented in quiet and AzBio sentences presented at a +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio in both the combined acoustic and electric (A+E) and electric (E) alone listening modes. Acoustic gain was calculated by subtracting these two scores. Correlations between these physiologic and speech perception measures were then computed. ECAP amplitudes recorded from the most apical electrode were significantly correlated with CNC scores measured in the E alone (r = 0.56) and A+E conditions (r = 0.64), but not with performance on the AzBio test. ECochG responses recorded using the most apical electrode in the intracochlear array but evoked using a 500 Hz tone burst were not correlated with either the scores on the CNC or AzBio tests. However, ECochG amplitude was correlated with a composite metric relating the additional benefit of acoustic gain in noise relative to quiet conditions (r = 0.67). Both measures can be recorded from Hybrid L24 CI users and both ECAP and ECochG measures may result in more complete characterization of speech perception outcomes than either measure alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Ryong Kim
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of IowaIowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of MedicineBusan, South Korea
| | - Viral D Tejani
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of IowaIowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa City, IA, USA
| | - Paul J Abbas
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of IowaIowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa City, IA, USA
| | - Carolyn J Brown
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of IowaIowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37:e353-9. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
21
|
Reiss LAJ, Eggleston JL, Walker EP, Oh Y. Two Ears Are Not Always Better than One: Mandatory Vowel Fusion Across Spectrally Mismatched Ears in Hearing-Impaired Listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2016; 17:341-56. [PMID: 27220769 PMCID: PMC4940290 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0570-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 04/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Hearing loss and auditory prostheses can alter auditory processing by inducing large pitch mismatches and broad pitch fusion between the two ears. Similar to integration of incongruent inputs in other sensory modalities, the mismatched, fused pitches are often averaged across ears for simple stimuli. Here, we measured parallel effects on complex stimulus integration using a new technique based on vowel classification in five bilateral hearing aid users and eight bimodal cochlear implant users. Continua between five pairs of synthetic vowels were created by varying the first formant spectral peak while keeping the second formant constant. Comparison of binaural and monaural vowel classification functions for each vowel pair continuum enabled visualization of the following frequency-dependent integration trends: (1) similar monaural and binaural functions, (2) ear dominance, (3) binaural averaging, and (4) binaural interference. Hearing aid users showed all trends, while bimodal cochlear implant users showed mostly ear dominance or interference. Interaural pitch mismatches, frequency ranges of binaural pitch fusion, and the relative weightings of pitch averaging across ears were also measured using tone and/or electrode stimulation. The presence of both large interaural pitch mismatches and broad pitch fusion was not sufficient to predict vowel integration trends such as binaural averaging or interference. The way that pitch averaging was weighted between ears also appears to be important for determining binaural vowel integration trends. Abnormally broad spectral fusion and the associated phoneme fusion across mismatched ears may underlie binaural speech perception interference observed in hearing aid and cochlear implant users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina A J Reiss
- Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Jessica L Eggleston
- Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Emily P Walker
- Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Yonghee Oh
- Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Staisloff HE, Lee DH, Aronoff JM. Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation. Hear Res 2016; 337:59-64. [PMID: 27208791 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
For bilateral cochlear implant users, the left and right arrays are typically not physically aligned, resulting in a degradation of binaural fusion, which can be detrimental to binaural abilities. Perceptually aligning the two arrays can be accomplished by disabling electrodes in one ear that do not have a perceptually corresponding electrode in the other side. However, disabling electrodes at the edges of the array will cause compression of the input frequency range into a smaller cochlear extent, which may result in reduced spectral resolution. An alternative approach to overcome this mismatch would be to only align one edge of the array. By aligning either only the apical or basal end of the arrays, fewer electrodes would be disabled, potentially causing less reduction in spectral resolution. The goal of this study was to determine the relative effect of aligning either the basal or apical end of the electrode with regards to binaural fusion. A vocoder was used to simulate cochlear implant listening conditions in normal hearing listeners. Speech signals were vocoded such that the two ears were either predominantly aligned at only the basal or apical end of the simulated arrays. The experiment was then repeated with a spectrally inverted vocoder to determine whether the detrimental effects on fusion were related to the spectral-temporal characteristics of the stimuli or the location in the cochlea where the misalignment occurred. In Experiment 1, aligning the basal portion of the simulated arrays led to significantly less binaural fusion than aligning the apical portions of the simulated array. However, when the input was spectrally inverted, aligning the apical portion of the simulated array led to significantly less binaural fusion than aligning the basal portions of the simulated arrays. These results suggest that, for speech, with its predominantly low frequency spectral-temporal modulations, it is more important to perceptually align the apical portion of the array to better preserve binaural fusion. By partially aligning these arrays, cochlear implant users could potentially increase their ability to fuse speech sounds presented to the two ears while maximizing spectral resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E Staisloff
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| | - Daniel H Lee
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| | - Justin M Aronoff
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Guimarães AC, de Carvalho GM, Duarte AS, Bianchini WA, Sarasty AB, di Gregorio MF, Zernotti ME, Sartorato EL, Castilho AM. Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 81:190-6. [PMID: 25649137 PMCID: PMC9449015 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2013] [Accepted: 06/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. Objectives To evaluate the hearing preservation in patients that underwent implant placement and to compare the results in accordance with the approach to the inner ear. Methods 19 subjects underwent a soft surgical technique, and the electrode MED-EL FLEX™ EAS, designed to be atraumatic, was used. We evaluated pre- and postoperative tonal audiometric tests with an average of 18.4 months after implantation, to measure the rate of hearing preservation. Results 17 patients had total or partial preservation of residual hearing; 5 had total hearing preservation and two individuals had no preservation of hearing. The insertion of the electrode occurred through a cochleostomy in 3 patients, and in 2 of these there was no hearing preservation; the other 16 patients experienced electrode insertion through a round window approach. All patients benefited from the cochlear implant, even those who are only using electrical stimulation. Conclusion The hearing preservation occurred in 89.4% of cases. There was no significant difference between the forms of inner ear approach.
Collapse
|
24
|
Aronoff JM, Shayman C, Prasad A, Suneel D, Stelmach J. Unilateral spectral and temporal compression reduces binaural fusion for normal hearing listeners with cochlear implant simulations. Hear Res 2014; 320:24-9. [PMID: 25549574 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Revised: 12/10/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Patients with single sided deafness have recently begun receiving cochlear implants in their deaf ear. These patients gain a significant benefit from having a cochlear implant. However, despite this benefit, they are considerably slower to develop binaural abilities such as summation compared to bilateral cochlear implant patients. This suggests that these patients have difficulty fusing electric and acoustic signals. Although this may reflect inherent differences between electric and acoustic stimulation, it may also reflect properties of the processor and fitting system, which result in spectral and temporal compression. To examine the possibility that unilateral spectral and temporal compression can adversely affect binaural fusion, this study tested normal hearing listeners' binaural fusion through the use of vocoded speech with unilateral spectral and temporal compression. The results indicate that unilateral spectral and temporal compression can each hinder binaural fusion and thus may adversely affect binaural abilities in patients with single sided deafness who use a cochlear implant in their deaf ear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Aronoff
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| | - Corey Shayman
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA; Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 393 Morrill Hall, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
| | - Akila Prasad
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| | - Deepa Suneel
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| | - Julia Stelmach
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S. 6th St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery. Int J Otolaryngol 2014; 2014:468515. [PMID: 25276136 PMCID: PMC4167950 DOI: 10.1155/2014/468515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2014] [Revised: 08/15/2014] [Accepted: 08/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past, it was thought that hearing loss patients with residual low-frequency hearing would not be good candidates for cochlear implantation since insertion was expected to induce inner ear trauma. Recent advances in electrode design and surgical techniques have made the preservation of residual low-frequency hearing achievable and desirable. The importance of preserving residual low-frequency hearing cannot be underestimated in light of the added benefit of hearing in noisy atmospheres and in music quality. The concept of electrical and acoustic stimulation involves electrically stimulating the nonfunctional, high-frequency region of the cochlea with a cochlear implant and applying a hearing aid in the low-frequency range. The principle of preserving low-frequency hearing by a “soft surgery” cochlear implantation could also be useful to the population of children who might profit from regenerative hair cell therapy in the future.
Main aspects of low-frequency hearing preservation surgery are discussed in this review: its brief history, electrode design, principles and advantages of electric-acoustic stimulation, surgical technique, and further implications of this new treatment possibility for hearing impaired patients.
Collapse
|
26
|
Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea. Hear Res 2014; 315:10-24. [PMID: 24975087 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Revised: 06/06/2014] [Accepted: 06/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Place pitch was investigated in a computational model of the implanted human cochlea containing nerve fibres with realistic trajectories that take the variable distance between the organ of Corti and spiral ganglion into account. The model was further updated from previous studies by including fluid compartments in the modiolus and updating the electrical conductivity values of (temporal) bone and the modiolus, based on clinical data. Four different cochlear geometries are used, modelled with both lateral and perimodiolar implants, and their neural excitation patterns were examined for nerve fibres modelled with and without peripheral processes. Additionally, equations were derived from the model geometries that describe Greenwood's frequency map as a function of cochlear angle at the basilar membrane as well as at the spiral ganglion. The main findings are: (I) in the first (basal) turn of the cochlea, cochlear implant induced pitch can be predicted fairly well using the Greenwood function. (II) Beyond the first turn this pitch becomes increasingly unpredictable, greatly dependent on stimulus level, state of the cochlear neurons and the electrode's distance from the modiolus. (III) After the first turn cochlear implant induced pitch decreases as stimulus level increases, but the pitch does not reach values expected from direct spiral ganglion stimulation unless the peripheral processes are missing. (IV) Electrode contacts near the end of the spiral ganglion or deeper elicit very unpredictable pitch, with broad frequency ranges that strongly overlap with those of neighbouring contacts. (V) The characteristic place pitch for stimulation at either the organ of Corti or the spiral ganglion can be described as a function of cochlear angle by the equations presented in this paper.
Collapse
|
27
|
Prentiss S, Staecker H, Wolford B. Ipsilateral acoustic electric pitch matching: A case study of cochlear implantation in an up-sloping hearing loss with preserved hearing across multiple frequencies. Cochlear Implants Int 2014; 15:161-5. [DOI: 10.1179/1754762814y.0000000066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
28
|
Schatzer R, Vermeire K, Visser D, Krenmayr A, Kals M, Voormolen M, Van de Heyning P, Zierhofer C. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch. Hear Res 2013; 309:26-35. [PMID: 24252455 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2013] [Revised: 10/22/2013] [Accepted: 11/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Eight cochlear implant users with near-normal hearing in their non-implanted ear compared pitch percepts for pulsatile electric and acoustic pure-tone stimuli presented to the two ears. Six subjects were implanted with a 31-mm MED-EL FLEX(SOFT) electrode, and two with a 24-mm medium (M) electrode, with insertion angles of the most apical contacts ranging from 565° to 758°. In the first experiment, frequency-place functions were derived from pure-tone matches to 1500-pps unmodulated pulse trains presented to individual electrodes and compared to Greenwood's frequency position map along the organ of Corti. While the overall median downward shift of the obtained frequency-place functions (-0.16 octaves re. Greenwood) and the mean shifts in the basal (<240°; -0.33 octaves) and middle (-0.35 octaves) regions were statistically significant, the shift in the apical region (>480°; 0.26 octaves) was not. Standard deviations of frequency-place functions were approximately half an octave at electrode insertion angles below 480°, increasing to an octave at higher angular locations while individual functions were gradually leveling off. In a second experiment, subjects matched the rates of unmodulated pulse trains presented to individual electrodes in the apical half of the array to low-frequency pure tones between 100 Hz and 450 Hz. The aim was to investigate the influence of electrode place on the salience of temporal pitch cues, for coding strategies that present temporal fine structure information via rate modulations on select apical channels. Most subjects achieved reliable matches to tone frequencies from 100 Hz to 300 Hz only on electrodes at angular insertion depths beyond 360°, while rate-matches to 450-Hz tones were primarily achieved on electrodes at shallower insertion angles. Only for electrodes in the second turn the average slopes of rate-pitch functions did not differ significantly from the pure-tone references, suggesting their use for the encoding of within-channel fine frequency information via rate modulations in temporal fine structure stimulation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhold Schatzer
- Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Katrien Vermeire
- C. Doppler Laboratory for Active Implantable Systems, Institute of Ion Physics and Applied Physics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniel Visser
- C. Doppler Laboratory for Active Implantable Systems, Institute of Ion Physics and Applied Physics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andreas Krenmayr
- C. Doppler Laboratory for Active Implantable Systems, Institute of Ion Physics and Applied Physics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mathias Kals
- C. Doppler Laboratory for Active Implantable Systems, Institute of Ion Physics and Applied Physics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maurits Voormolen
- Univ. Dept. of Radiology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Univ. Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Clemens Zierhofer
- Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine an optimal approach to program combined acoustic plus electric (A+E) hearing devices in the same ear to maximize speech-recognition performance. DESIGN Ten participants with at least 1 year of experience using Nucleus Hybrid (short electrode) A+E devices were evaluated across three different fitting conditions that varied in the frequency ranges assigned to the acoustically and electrically presented portions of the spectrum. Real-ear measurements were used to optimize the acoustic component for each participant, and the acoustic stimulation was then held constant across conditions. The lower boundary of the electric frequency range was systematically varied to create three conditions with respect to the upper boundary of the acoustic spectrum: Meet, Overlap, and Gap programming. Consonant recognition in quiet and speech recognition in competing-talker babble were evaluated after participants were given the opportunity to adapt by using the experimental programs in their typical everyday listening situations. Participants provided subjective ratings and evaluations for each fitting condition. RESULTS There were no significant differences in performance between conditions (Meet, Overlap, Gap) for consonant recognition in quiet. A significant decrement in performance was measured for the Overlap fitting condition for speech recognition in babble. Subjective ratings indicated a significant preference for the Meet fitting regimen. CONCLUSIONS Participants using the Hybrid ipsilateral A+E device generally performed better when the acoustic and electric spectra were programmed to meet at a single frequency region, as opposed to a gap or overlap. Although there is no particular advantage for the Meet fitting strategy for recognition of consonants in quiet, the advantage becomes evident for speech recognition in competing-talker babble and in patient preferences.
Collapse
|
30
|
Looi V, Gfeller K, Driscoll V. MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW. Semin Hear 2012; 33:307-334. [PMID: 23459244 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in music perception of cochlear implant (CI) recipients, and a growing body of research conducted in this area. The majority of these studies have examined perceptual accuracy for pitch, rhythm, and timbre. Another important, but less commonly studied aspect of music listening is appreciation, or appraisal. Despite the ongoing research into potential technological improvements that may improve music perception for recipients, both perceptual accuracy and appreciation generally remain poor for most recipients. Whilst perceptual accuracy for music is important, appreciation and enjoyment also warrants research as it also contributes to clinical outcomes and perceived benefits. Music training is being shown to offer excellent potential for improving music perception and appreciation for recipients.Therefore, the primary topics of this review are music appreciation and training. However, a brief overview of the psychoacoustic, technical, and physiological factors associated with a recipient's perception of music is provided, as these are important factors in understanding the listening experience for CI recipients. The purpose of this review is to summarize key papers that have investigated these issues, in order to demonstrate that i) music enjoyment and appraisal is an important and valid consideration in evaluating music outcomes for recipients, and ii) that music training can improve music listening for many recipients, and is something that can be offered to persons using current technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Looi
- c/o Cochlear - Asia Pacific, 1 University Ave, Macquarie University 2109 NSW
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Reiss LAJ, Turner CW, Karsten SA, Erenberg SR, Taylor J, Gantz BJ. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of stimulation channels in the Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2012; 132:3406-3417. [PMID: 23145621 PMCID: PMC3505213 DOI: 10.1121/1.4757735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2011] [Revised: 09/18/2012] [Accepted: 09/21/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Consonant recognition was measured as a function of the number of stimulation channels for Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant (CI) users, long-electrode CI users, and normal-hearing (NH) listeners in quiet and background noise. Short-electrode CI subjects were tested with 1-6 channels allocated to a frequency range of 1063-7938 Hz. Long-electrode CI subjects were tested with 1-6, 8, or 22 channels allocated to 188-7938 Hz, or 1-6 or 15 channels from the basal 15 electrodes allocated to 1063-7938 Hz. NH listeners were tested with simulations of each CI group/condition. Despite differences in intracochlear electrode spacing for equivalent channel conditions, all CI subject groups performed similarly at each channel condition and improved up to at least four channels in quiet and noise. All CI subject groups underperformed relative to NH subjects. These preliminary findings suggest that the limited channel benefit seen for CI users may not be due solely to increases in channel interactions as a function of electrode density. Other factors such as pre-operative patient history, location of stimulation in the base versus apex, or a limit on the number of electric channels that can be processed cognitively, may also interact with the effects of electrode contact spacing along the cochlea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina A J Reiss
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Reiss LAJ, Perreau AE, Turner CW. Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant. Audiol Neurootol 2012; 17:357-72. [PMID: 22907151 PMCID: PMC3519932 DOI: 10.1159/000341165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2012] [Accepted: 06/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Because some users of a Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant (CI) lose their low-frequency residual hearing after receiving the CI, we tested whether increasing the CI speech processor frequency allocation range to include lower frequencies improves speech perception in these individuals. A secondary goal was to see if pitch perception changed after experience with the new CI frequency allocation. Three subjects who had lost all residual hearing in the implanted ear were recruited to use an experimental CI frequency allocation with a lower frequency cutoff than their current clinical frequency allocation. Speech and pitch perception results were collected at multiple time points throughout the study. In general, subjects showed little or no improvement for speech recognition with the experimental allocation when the CI was worn with a hearing aid in the contralateral ear. However, all 3 subjects showed changes in pitch perception that followed the changes in frequency allocations over time, consistent with previous studies showing that pitch perception changes upon provision of a CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina A J Reiss
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mowry SE, Woodson E, Gantz BJ. New frontiers in cochlear implantation: acoustic plus electric hearing, hearing preservation, and more. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 45:187-203. [PMID: 22115690 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
As cochlear implant technology has changed, so have implantation criteria. In addition to profoundly deaf individuals, candidacy has expanded to include those with significant remaining acoustic hearing. This article describes the devices that are now in clinical trial, discusses the rationale as to why residual hearing preservation is important, details the surgical techniques for hearing preservation, and shares the clinical results of electric plus acoustic processing. That a video is available online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Mowry
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, PFP 21212, Iowa City, IA 52249, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Effects of extreme tonotopic mismatches between bilateral cochlear implants on electric pitch perception: a case study. Ear Hear 2011; 32:536-40. [PMID: 21307775 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31820c81b0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent studies suggest that pitch perceived through cochlear implants (CIs) changes with experience to minimize spectral mismatches between electric and acoustic hearing. This study aimed to test whether perceived spectral mismatches are similarly minimized between two electric inputs. DESIGN Pitch perception was studied in a subject with a 10-mm CI in one ear and a 24-mm CI in the other ear. Both processors were programmed to allocate information from the same frequency range of 188-7938 Hz, despite the large differences in putative insertion depth and stimulated cochlear locations between the CIs. RESULTS After 2 and 3 years of experience, pitch-matched electrode pairs between CIs were aligned closer to the processor-provided frequencies than to cochlear position. CONCLUSIONS Pitch perception may have adapted to reduce perceived spectral discrepancies between bilateral CI inputs, despite 2-3 octave differences in tonotopic mapping.
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review examines evidence for potential benefits of using cochlear implant electrodes that extend into the apical regions of the cochlea. Most cochlear implant systems use electrode arrays that extend 1 to 1.5 turns from the basal cochleostomy, but one manufacturer (MED-EL GmbH) uses an electrode array that is considerably longer. The fundamental rationale for using electrodes extending toward the apex of the cochlea is to provide additional low-pitched auditory percepts and thereby increase the spectral information available to the user. Several experimental long arrays have also been produced by other manufacturers to assess potential benefits of this approach. DESIGN In addition to assessing the effects of deeply inserted electrodes on performance, this review examines several underlying and associated issues, including cochlear anatomy, electrode design, surgical considerations (including insertion trauma), and pitch scaling trials. Where possible, the aim is to draw conclusions regarding the potential from apical electrodes in general, rather than relating to the performance of specific and current devices. RESULTS Imaging studies indicate that currently available electrode arrays rarely extend more than two turns into the cochlea, the mean insertion angle for full insertions of the MED-EL electrodes being about 630°. This is considerably shorter than the total length of the cochlea and more closely approximates the length of the spiral ganglion. Anatomical considerations, and some modelling studies, suggest that fabrication of even longer electrodes is unlikely to provide additional spectral information. The issue of potential benefit from the most apical electrodes, therefore, is whether they are able to selectively stimulate discrete and tonotopically ordered neural populations near the apex of the spiral ganglion, where the ganglion cells are closely grouped. Pitch scaling studies, using the MED-EL and experimental long arrays, suggest that this is achieved in many cases, but that a significant number of individuals show evidence of pitch confusions or reversals among the most apical electrodes, presumably reducing potential performance benefit and presenting challenges for processor programming. CONCLUSIONS Benefits in terms of speech recognition and other performance measures are less clear. Several studies have indicated that deactivation of apical electrodes results in poorer speech recognition performance, but these have been mostly acute studies where the subjects have been accustomed to the full complement of electrodes, thus making interpretation difficult. Some chronic studies have suggested that apical electrodes do provide additional performance benefit, but others have shown performance improvement after deactivating some of the apical electrodes. Whether or not deeply inserted electrodes can offer performance benefits, there is evidence that currently available designs tend to produce more intracochlear trauma than shorter arrays, in terms of loss of residual acoustic hearing and reduction of the neural substrate. This may have important long-term consequences for the user. Furthermore, as it is possible that subjects with better low-frequency residual hearing are more likely to benefit from the inclusion of apical electrodes, there may be a potential clinical dilemma as the same subjects are those most likely to benefit from bimodal electroacoustic stimulation, requiring a relatively shallow insertion.
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Kong YY, Braida LD. Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2011; 54:959-980. [PMID: 21060139 PMCID: PMC3107368 DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0197)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Improved speech recognition in binaurally combined acoustic-electric stimulation (otherwise known as bimodal hearing) could arise when listeners integrate speech cues from the acoustic and electric hearing. The aims of this study were (a) to identify speech cues extracted in electric hearing and residual acoustic hearing in the low-frequency region and (b) to investigate cochlear implant (CI) users' ability to integrate speech cues across frequencies. METHOD Normal-hearing (NH) and CI subjects participated in consonant and vowel identification tasks. Each subject was tested in 3 listening conditions: CI alone (vocoder speech for NH), hearing aid (HA) alone (low-pass filtered speech for NH), and both. Integration ability for each subject was evaluated using a model of optimal integration--the PreLabeling integration model (Braida, 1991). RESULTS Only a few CI listeners demonstrated bimodal benefit for phoneme identification in quiet. Speech cues extracted from the CI and the HA were highly redundant for consonants but were complementary for vowels. CI listeners also exhibited reduced integration ability for both consonant and vowel identification compared with their NH counterparts. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that reduced bimodal benefits in CI listeners are due to insufficient complementary speech cues across ears, a decrease in integration ability, or both.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this feasibility study was to evaluate whether the use of a shorter-length cochlear implant (10 mm) on one ear and a standard electrode (24 mm) on the contralateral ear is a viable bilateral option for children with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. A secondary purpose of this study was to determine whether the ear with the shorter-length electrode performs similarly to the standard-length electrode. Our goal was to provide an option of electrical stimulation that theoretically might preserve the structures of the scala media and organ of Corti. STUDY DESIGN The study is being conducted as a repeated-measure, single-subject experiment. SETTING University of Iowa-Department of Otolaryngology. PATIENTS Eight pediatric patients with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss between the ages of 12 and 24 months. INTERVENTIONS Nucleus Hybrid S12 10-mm electrode and a Nucleus Freedom implant in the contralateral ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) parent questionnaire, Early Speech Perception, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure word test, and Children's Vowel tests will be used to evaluate speech perception and the Minnesota Child Development Inventory and Preschool Language Scales 3 test will be used to evaluate language growth. RESULTS Preliminary results for 8 children have been collected before and after the operation using the IT-MAIS. All 3 children showed incremental improvements in their IT-MAIS scores overtime. Early Speech Perception, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure word test, and Children's Vowel word perception results indicated no difference between the individual ears for the 2 children tested. Performance compared with age-matched children implanted with standard bilateral cochlear implants showed similar results to the children implanted with Nucleus Hybrid S12 10-mm electrode and a Nucleus Freedom implant in contralateral ears. CONCLUSION The use of a shorter-length cochlear implant on one ear and a standard-length electrode on the contralateral ear might provide a viable option for bilateral cochlear implantation in children with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss. Further study of this patient population will be continued.
Collapse
|
39
|
Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Karsten S, Fowler J, Reiss LA. Impact of hair cell preservation in cochlear implantation: combined electric and acoustic hearing. Otol Neurotol 2011; 31:1227-32. [PMID: 20802370 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181f24005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article reviews some of the potential benefits of preserving low-frequency residual hearing using a short-electrode cochlear implant. Both the status of the inner ear and acoustic characteristics of speech cues are important factors. How does the magnitude of the potential benefits depend on the candidacy criteria for implantation with a hearing-preservation electrode? BACKGROUND Previous research has demonstrated that preserving residual hearing in cochlear implantation can provide significant advantages for the understanding of speech in background noise as well as for the aesthetic qualities of music and other sounds. Developing optimal candidacy guidelines for these devices is a current goal. METHODS In a large group of patients with Hybrid (acoustic + electric) cochlear implant, performance in the recognition of speech in background of other talkers is measured and compared with patients with traditional long-electrode implant. In addition, a number of patient characteristics are compared to success with the short-electrode implant. RESULTS Age and duration of hearing loss are found to be predictive factors for the success of the short-electrode approach. CONCLUSION Optimal criterion for candidacy for the use of the short-electrode versus a traditional long electrode can improve the outlook for patients with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Turner
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jethanamest D, Tan CT, Fitzgerald MB, Svirsky MA. A new software tool to optimize frequency table selection for cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31:1242-7. [PMID: 20729774 PMCID: PMC2962926 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181f2063e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS When cochlear implant (CI) users are allowed to self-select the "most intelligible" frequency-to-electrode table, some of them choose one that differs from the default frequency table that is normally used in clinical practice. BACKGROUND CIs reproduce the tonotopicity of normal cochleas using frequency-to-electrode tables that assign stimulation of more basal electrodes to higher frequencies and more apical electrodes to lower frequency sounds. Current audiologic practice uses a default frequency-to-electrode table for most patients. However, individual differences in cochlear size, neural survival, and electrode positioning may result in different tables sounding most intelligible to different patients. No clinical tools currently exist to facilitate this fitting. METHODS A software tool was designed that enables CI users to self-select a most intelligible frequency table. Users explore a 2-dimensional space that represents a range of different frequency tables. Unlike existing tools, this software enables users to interactively audition speech processed by different frequency tables and quickly identify a preferred one. Pilot testing was performed in 11 long-term, postlingually deaf CI users. RESULTS The software tool was designed, developed, tested, and debugged. Patients successfully used the tool to sample frequency tables and to self-select tables deemed most intelligible, which for approximately half of the users differed from the clinical default. CONCLUSION A software tool allowing CI users to self-select frequency-to-electrode tables may help in fitting postlingually deaf users. This novel approach may transform current methods of CI fitting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jethanamest
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Woodson EA, Reiss LA, Turner CW, Gfeller K, Gantz BJ. The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 67:125-134. [PMID: 19955729 PMCID: PMC4274269 DOI: 10.1159/000262604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The Hybrid S or 'short-electrode' cochlear implant was developed to treat patients with a severe to profound hearing loss limited to the high frequencies. The short electrode is implanted into just the base or high-frequency region of the cochlea, with the goal of preserving residual low-frequency hearing. As a result, electric stimulation can be combined with acoustic stimulation in the same ear (and the opposite ear); this is one instance of 'acoustic plus electric' (A + E) stimulation. In this paper, we will review the latest findings from the first two stages of the clinical trial for the Hybrid concept in the United States. Generally, we will review surgical techniques, clinical trial criteria, residual hearing preservation, improvements in speech perception in quiet, and predictive factors for patient benefit. We will also discuss the significant benefit of A + E stimulation for speech perception in noise and musical measures of melody and instrument recognition, as well as valuable insights into central auditory nervous system plasticity gained from the use of a very short electrode array.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika A. Woodson
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Lina A.J. Reiss
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorers, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Christopher W. Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorers, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kate Gfeller
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorers, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
- School of Music, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Bruce J. Gantz
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Turner CW, Reiss LAJ, Gantz BJ. Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing. Hear Res 2007; 242:164-71. [PMID: 18164883 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2007] [Revised: 11/21/2007] [Accepted: 11/22/2007] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The topic of this review is the strategy of preserving residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear to provide combined electrical stimulation and acoustic hearing as a rehabilitative strategy for sensorineural hearing loss. This chapter will concentrate on research done with the Iowa/Nucleus 10 mm Hybrid device, but we will also attempt to summarize strategies and results from other groups around the world who use slightly different approaches. A number of studies have shown that preserving residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear is a realistic goal for many patients with severe high-frequency hearing loss. The addition of the electric stimulation to their existing acoustic hearing can provide increased speech recognition for these patients. In addition, the preserved acoustic hearing can offer considerable advantages, as compared to a traditional cochlear implant, for tasks such as speech recognition in backgrounds or appreciation of music and other situations where the poor frequency resolution of electric stimulation has been a disadvantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Turner
- Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, 121B SHC Building, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|