Packing of the Cochleostomy Site Affects Auditory Nerve Response Thresholds in Precurved Off-Stylet Cochlear Implants

On the Intracochlear Location of Straight Electrode Arrays After Cochlear Implantation: How Lateral Are Lateral Wall Electrodes?

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implants are the gold standard for patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss. A focused electrical stimulation of individual spiral ganglion neurons has not been achieved yet because the scala tympani is a fluid-filled compartment and does not offer a matrix for neuritic outgrowth. Coating of the electrode contacts with swelling hydrogels could fill that gap between the electrode array and the medial wall of the cochlea. Therefore, the exact position of the electrode array within the scala tympani has to be known.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of patient data sets.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center. A total of 95 patients with cochlear implants from one manufacturer were included in this study. The lateral wall, the modiolar wall, and the cochlear implant electrode were segmented using OsiriX MD. For repositioning and reconstructing the respective contours and measuring distances, files were analyzed in MATLAB. The distances from the edge of each electrode contact to the cochlear walls showed no significant differences. But between the different contacts within each patient, there were significant differences. Around 180 degree insertion, electrodes start to get in contact with the lateral wall. The tip of the electrode array was always facing toward the modiolar wall independent of the length of the electrode. We established a method to analyze the position of electrodes within the cochlea.

[Neurophysiological parameters for speech recognition in patients with cochlear implants]

OBJECTIVES

 Cochlea Implants (CI) are the preferred treatment for deaf and highly hearing imparied people. While deaf people already profit enormously from any regained hearing perception, it is not as easy to predict a profitable outcome for people with a remaining sense of hearing. To provide patients the best possible outcome in speech understanding, a lot of parameters have to be identified and adjusted. The aim of this study is to show the influence of objective parameters on classified speech understanding using collected data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 A total of 52 patients and 65 ears aged between 18 and 80 years were included in this study. ECAP-thresholds from intraoperative measurements and impedance were used as objective parameters. T- and C/M-levels were defined as subjective parameters. To classify the performance the value of speech understanding was used.

RESULTS

 Differences between both groups (age, time after implantation) were not significant. The gained word scores at 500 Hz correlated significantly with the results of the speech perception threshold on two-digit numbers. The electrode impedances correlated on average with speech understanding with constant variability. The distributions of objective and subjective parameters showed partially significant differences. Many distributions showed significant differences to the normal distribution. Accordingly, the overlapping areas of the significance levels are very narrow.

CONCLUSION

 Higher impedances and incorrectly adjusted T-levels resulted in a worse speech understanding. Relation of C/M-levels to ECAP thresholds seem to be crucial for good speech understanding.

Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes

Background

The inserted cochlear implanted electrode is covered at the site of the round window or cochleostomy to prevent infections and leakage. In a surgically hearing preservational concept, low intracochlear pressure changes are of high importance. The aim of this study was to observe intracochlear pressure changes due to different sealing techniques in a cochlear model.

Methods

Cochlear implant electrode insertions were performed in an artifical cochlear model and the intracochlear pressure changes were recorded in parallel with a micro-pressure sensor positioned in the apical region of the cochlea model to follow the maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure. Four different sealing conditions were compared: 1) overlay, 2) overlay with fascia pushed in, 3) donut-like fascia ring, 4) donut-like fascia ring pushed in.

Results

We found statistically significant differences in the occurrence of maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure peak changes related to sealing procedure comparing the different techniques. While the lowest amplitude changes could be observed for the overlay technique (0.14 mmHg ± 0.06) the highest values could be observed for the donut-like pushed in technique (1.79 mmHg ± 0.69).

Conclusion

Sealing the electrode inserted cochlea can lead to significant intracochlear pressure changes. Pushing in of the sealing tissue cannot be recommended.

Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child

OBJECTIVE

To compare stimulation parameters of peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar electrode arrays using two surgical approaches.

METHODS

Impedance, stimulation thresholds, comfortably loud current levels, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds were compared between 2 arrays implanted in the same child at 5 time points: surgery, activation/day 1, week 1, and months 1 and 3. The peri-modiolar array was implanted via cochleostomy in all children (n = 64), while the anti-modiolar array was inserted via a cochleostomy in 43 children and via the round window in 21 children.

RESULTS

The anti-modiolar array had significantly lower impedance, but required higher current levels to elicit thresholds, comfort, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds than the peri-modiolar array across all time points, particularly in basal electrodes (p < 0.05). The prevalence of open electrodes was similar in anti-modiolar (n = 5) and peri-modiolar (n = 3) arrays.

CONCLUSION

Significant but clinically acceptable differences in stimulation parameters between peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar arrays persisted four months after surgery in children using bilateral cochlear implants. The surgical approach used to insert the anti-modiolar array had no overall effect on outcomes.

Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the effects of the intracochlear position of cochlear implants on the clinical fitting levels were analyzed.

DESIGN

A total of 130 adult subjects who used a CII/HiRes 90K cochlear implant with a HiFocus 1/1J electrode were included in the study. The insertion angle and the distance to the modiolus of each electrode contact were determined using high-resolution CT scanning. The threshold levels (T-levels) and maximum comfort levels (M-levels) at 1 year of follow-up were determined. The degree of speech perception of the subjects was evaluated during routine clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The depths of insertion of all the electrode contacts were determined. The distance to the modiolus was significantly smaller at the basal and apical cochlear parts compared with that at the middle of the cochlea (p < 0.05). The T-levels increased toward the basal end of the cochlea (3.4 dB). Additionally, the M-levels, which were fitted in our clinic using a standard profile, also increased toward the basal end, although with a lower amplitude (1.3 dB). Accordingly, the dynamic range decreased toward the basal end (2.1 dB). No correlation was found between the distance to the modiolus and the T-level or the M-level. Furthermore, the correlation between the insertion depth and stimulation levels was not affected by the duration of deafness, age at implantation or the time since implantation. Additionally, the T-levels showed a significant correlation with the speech perception scores (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The stimulation levels of the cochlear implants were affected by the intracochlear position of the electrode contacts, which were determined using postoperative CT scanning. Interestingly, these levels depended on the insertion depth, whereas the distance to the modiolus did not affect the stimulation levels. The T-levels increased toward the basal end of the cochlea. The level profiles were independent of the overall stimulation levels and were not affected by the biographical data of the patients, such as the duration of deafness, age at implantation or time since implantation. Further research is required to elucidate how fitting using level profiles with an increase toward the basal end of the cochlea benefits speech perception. Future investigations may elucidate an explanation for the effects of the intracochlear electrode position on the stimulation levels and might facilitate future improvements in electrode design.

Population-based prediction of fitting levels for individual cochlear implant recipients

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed the predictability of fitting levels for cochlear implant recipients based on a review of the clinical levels of the recipients.

DESIGN

Data containing threshold levels (T-levels) and maximum comfort levels (M-levels) for 151 adult subjects using a CII/HiRes 90K cochlear implant with a HiFocus 1/1 J electrode were used. The 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles of the T- and M-levels are reported. Speech perception of the subjects, using a HiRes speech coding strategy, was measured during routine clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

T-levels for most subjects were between 20 and 35% of their M-levels and were rarely (<1/50) below 10% of the M-levels. Furthermore, both T- and M-levels showed an increase over the first year of follow-up. Interestingly, levels expressed in linear charge units showed a clear increase in dynamic range (DR) over 1 year (29.8 CU; SD 73.0), whereas the DR expressed in decibels remained stable. T-level and DR were the only fitting parameters for which a significant correlation with speech perception (r = 0.34, p < 0.01, and r = 0.33, p < 0.01, respectively) could be demonstrated. Additionally, analysis showed that T- and M-level profiles expressed in decibels were independent of the subjects' across-site mean levels. Using mixed linear models, predictive models were obtained for the T- and M-levels of all separate electrode contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the data set from 151 subjects, clinically applicable predictive models for T- and M-levels have been obtained. Based on one psychophysical measurement and a population-based T- or M-level profile, individual recipients' T- and M-levels can be approximated with a closed-set formula. Additionally, the analyzed fitting level data can serve as a reference for future patients.

From nucleus 24 to 513: changing cochlear implant design affects auditory response thresholds

OBJECTIVES

We asked how thresholds of auditory activity evoked by a recent research cochlear implant, the Nucleus 513, compared with those evoked by previous generations of devices from the same manufacturer.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective repeated measures.

SETTING

Tertiary pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 182 children receiving unilateral or bilateral Nucleus cochlear implants.

INTERVENTIONS

Of 182 children, 39 received the N24M straight array, the oldest device in this study, 20 received the N24RCS Contour, the next device released, 57 received the 24RE Freedom, released after the N24RCS, and 66 received the N513 Leap electrode array, the newest device.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Behavioral thresholds and auditory nerve response thresholds were evoked by an apical, mid-array, and basal electrode and measured in 203 ears.

RESULTS

In general, auditory nerve thresholds decreased with newer devices. Responses evoked by the mid-array electrode had higher thresholds than responses to the other electrodes in most devices and highest in the operating room for the N513. Apical electrodes evoked the lowest thresholds at the level of the auditory nerve. Auditory nerve response thresholds decreased from the operating room to initial device activation with the 2 newest devices (N24RE and N513) tending to show the largest changes. Behavioral thresholds were at lowest levels for the 2 newest devices studied and, unlike auditory nerve response thresholds, decreased with age for all devices.

CONCLUSION

Evolving cochlear implant electrode design significantly affects auditory thresholds, but these changes do not occur uniformly along the array.

Round window electrode insertion potentiates retention in the scala tympani

CONCLUSIONS

The round window membrane (RWM)-intentioned approach is superior to the traditional bony cochleostomy (BC) approach in obtaining electrode placement within the scala tympani (ST).

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implant outcome is influenced by several factors, including optimal placement and retention of the electrode array within the ST. The present study aimed to assess whether the RWM route is superior to a traditional BC for placement and retention of the electrode array in the ST.

METHODS

This was a prospective consecutive non-randomized comparison study. All patients were implanted with the Advanced Bionics 1J electrode array. The RWM approach (n = 32) was compared with a traditional BC group (n = 33). The outcome measure was the electrode position as judged within the scalar chambers at four points along the basal turn using postoperative computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

When the mean position scores were compared, the RWM-intentioned group had significantly more electrodes directed towards the ST compartment than the BC group (p < 0.001). The RWM electrodes achieved 94% ST retention compared with 64% for the BC group (p < 0.05). All electrodes stayed in the ST in the RWM group, whereas in the BC group 9% crossed from the ST to the scala vestibuli.