Specific Targeting of Retrocochlear Auditory Pathway for Optimal Pharmacotherapy Delivery Using a Mouse Model

Cochlear protection against noise exposure requires serotonin type 3A receptor via the medial olivocochlear system

The cochlear efferent feedback system plays important roles in auditory processing, including regulation of the dynamic range of hearing, and provides protection against acoustic trauma. These functions are performed through medial olivocochlear (MOC) neurons. However, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. The serotonin type 3A (5-HT3A) receptor is widely expressed throughout the nervous system, which suggests important roles in various neural functions. However, involvement of the 5-HT3A receptor in the MOC system remains unclear. We used mice in this study and found that the 5-HT3A receptor was expressed in MOC neurons that innervated outer hair cells in the cochlea and was involved in the activation of MOC neurons by noise exposure. 5-HT3A receptor knockout impaired MOC functions, potentiated noise-induced hearing loss, and increased loss of ribbon synapses following noise exposure. Furthermore, 5-HT3 receptor agonist treatment alleviated the noise-induced hearing loss and loss of ribbon synapses, which enhanced cochlear protection provided by the MOC system. Our findings demonstrate that the 5-HT3A receptor plays fundamental roles in the MOC system and critically contributes to protection from noise-induced hearing impairment.

The mammalian efferent vestibular system utilizes cholinergic mechanisms to excite primary vestibular afferents

Electrical stimulation of the mammalian efferent vestibular system (EVS) predominantly excites primary vestibular afferents along two distinct time scales. Although roles for acetylcholine (ACh) have been demonstrated in other vertebrates, synaptic mechanisms underlying mammalian EVS actions are not well-characterized. To determine if activation of ACh receptors account for efferent-mediated afferent excitation in mammals, we recorded afferent activity from the superior vestibular nerve of anesthetized C57BL/6 mice while stimulating EVS neurons in the brainstem, before and after administration of cholinergic antagonists. Using a normalized coefficient of variation (CV*), we broadly classified vestibular afferents as regularly- (CV* < 0.1) or irregularly-discharging (CV* > 0.1) and characterized their responses to midline or ipsilateral EVS stimulation. Afferent responses to efferent stimulation were predominantly excitatory, grew in amplitude with increasing CV*, and consisted of fast and slow components that could be identified by differences in rise time and post-stimulus duration. Both efferent-mediated excitatory components were larger in irregular afferents with ipsilateral EVS stimulation. Our pharmacological data show, for the first time in mammals, that muscarinic AChR antagonists block efferent-mediated slow excitation whereas the nicotinic AChR antagonist DHβE selectively blocks efferent-mediated fast excitation, while leaving the efferent-mediated slow component intact. These data confirm that mammalian EVS actions are predominantly cholinergic.

A comparison of systemic and local dexamethasone administration: From perilymph/cochlea concentration to cochlear distribution

Different types of inner ear diseases can damage different cochlear subsites by different mechanisms. Steroids administered by different methods are commonly used for treating inner ear diseases. There is reason to believe that dexamethasone (Dex) may reach cochlear subsite targets via different pathways after administration by different methods: Intratympanic (IT), postaural (PA), and intraperitoneal (IP). The purpose of this study was to explore the cochlear concentration and distribution of Dex after administration by different methods. High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and immunofluorescence technology were employed to measure and compare the Dex concentration in the perilymph and cochlear tissue and the cochlear distribution of Dex. IT administration resulted in higher Dex concentrations in the perilymph and cochlear tissues than those with the other administration methods. Intratympanic and postaural administration could result in higher Dex concentrations in the organ of Corti than systemic administration, but systemic administration could result in higher Dex concentrations in the stria vascularis than the other administration methods. A decreasing basal-apical gradient of Dex uptake was present in the cochlea after IT but not IP or PA administration. These results indicate that different administration methods result in different Dex distributions, which can be attributed to features of the cochlear vascular system and intracochlear diffusion. Our results provide clinicians with an experimental basis for the use of different steroid injection routes to optimize the effects on inner ear diseases with different target organs.

Communication pathways to and from the inner ear and their contributions to drug delivery

The environment of the inner ear is highly regulated in a manner that some solutes are permitted to enter while others are excluded or transported out. Drug therapies targeting the sensory and supporting cells of the auditory and vestibular systems require the agent to gain entry to the fluid spaces of the inner ear, perilymph or endolymph, which surround the sensory organs. Access to the inner ear fluids from the vasculature is limited by the blood-labyrinth barriers, which include the blood-perilymph and blood-strial barriers. Intratympanic applications provide an alternative approach in which drugs are applied locally. Drug from the applied solution enters perilymph through the round window membrane, through the stapes, and under some circumstances, through thin bone in the otic capsule. The amount of drug applied to the middle ear is always substantially more than the amount entering perilymph. As a result, significant amounts of the applied drug can pass to the digestive system, to the vasculature, and to the brain. Drugs in perilymph pass to the vasculature and to cerebrospinal fluid via the cochlear aqueduct. Conversely, drugs applied to cerebrospinal fluid, including those given intrathecally, can enter perilymph through the cochlear aqueduct. Other possible routes in or out of the ear include passage by neuronal pathways, passage via endolymph and the endolymphatic sac, and possibly via lymphatic pathways. A better understanding of the pathways for drug movements in and out of the ear will enable better intervention strategies.

Dexamethasone's effect in the retrocochlear auditory centers of a noise-induced hearing loss mouse model

OBJECTIVE

Examine prophylactic effects of dexamethasone (Dex) in retrocochlear auditory centers in a noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) mouse model.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective animal study.

SETTING

Academic research center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two mice were divided into control, untreated, saline (2 and 10 µL), and Dex (2 and 10 µL) groups. Dex was applied intratympanically (IT) prior to 110 to 120 dB noise over 6 hours. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) were performed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months. Retrocochlear neuronal cells were labeled with FluoroGold and counted. Hair cells of the organ of Corti were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin and counted.

RESULTS

Auditory brainstem response thresholds of untreated NIHL, 2 and 10 µL IT saline, and 2 and 10 µL IT Dex were 21.7 ± 2.9 dB, 20 ± 0 dB, 20 ± 5 dB, 18.3 ± 2.9 dB, and 18.3 ± 2.9 dB, respectively. At 1-day post NIHL, all groups demonstrated profound hearing loss. At 2 weeks, 2 and 10 µL Dex thresholds improved to 47.5 ± 3.5 dB and 48.8 ± 18.9 dB, respectively, whereas the untreated and saline groups remained unchanged. Mean cell counts in the cochlear nucleus (CN), superior olivary complex (SOC), and lateral lemniscus (LL) of control mice were 1483 ± 190, 2807 ± 67, and 112 ± 20, respectively. After acoustic trauma, the untreated, saline, and 2 µL Dex groups yielded decreased neuronal counts in the SOC. In contrast, the 10 µL Dex group had 1883 ± 186 (CN), 2774 ± 182 (SOC), and 166 ± 18 (LL). There was sporadic hair cell loss for all traumatized groups.

CONCLUSION

Our NIHL mouse model demonstrated dose-dependent Dex pretreatment otoprotection against NIHL with preservation of retrocochlear auditory neurons.