First Experience With a New Miniaturized Pump-Driven Venovenous Extracorporeal CO2 Removal System (iLA Activve): A Retrospective Data Analysis

Effects of extracorporeal CO2 removal on gas exchange and ventilator settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) on gas exchange and respiratory settings in critically ill adults with respiratory failure.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive database search, including observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2000 to March 2022, targeting adult ICU patients undergoing ECCO2R. Primary outcomes were changes in gas exchange and ventilator settings 24 h after ECCO2R initiation, estimated as mean of differences, or proportions for adverse events (AEs); with subgroup analyses for disease indication and technology. Across RCTs, we assessed mortality, length of stay, ventilation days, and AEs as mean differences or odds ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies encompassing 1672 patients were included. ECCO2R was associated with a significant decrease in PaCO2, plateau pressure, and tidal volume and an increase in pH across all patient groups, at an overall 19% adverse event rate. In ARDS and lung transplant patients, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased significantly while ventilator settings were variable. "Higher extraction" systems reduced PaCO2 and respiratory rate more efficiently. The three available RCTs did not demonstrate an effect on mortality, but a significantly longer ICU and hospital stay associated with ECCO2R.

CONCLUSIONS

ECCO2R effectively reduces PaCO2 and acidosis allowing for less invasive ventilation. "Higher extraction" systems may be more efficient to achieve this goal. However, as RCTs have not shown a mortality benefit but increase AEs, ECCO2R's effects on clinical outcome remain unclear. Future studies should target patient groups that may benefit from ECCO2R. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD 42020154110 (on January 24, 2021).

Comparison of Hemostatic Changes in Pump-driven Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal and Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO 2 R) has gained widespread use as a supposedly less invasive alternative for hypercapnic respiratory failure besides venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). Despite technological advances, coagulation-related adverse events remain a major challenge in both therapies. The overlapping operating areas of VV ECMO and pump-driven ECCO 2 R could allow for a device selection targeted at the lowest risk of such complications. This retrospective analysis of 47 consecutive patients compared hemostatic changes between pump-driven ECCO 2 R (n = 23) and VV ECMO (n = 24) by application of linear mixed effect models. A significant decrease in platelet count, increase in D-dimer levels, and decrease of fibrinogen levels were observed. However, except for fibrinogen, the type of extracorporeal support did not have a significant effect on the time course of these parameters. Our findings suggest that in terms of hemocompatibility, pump-driven ECCO 2 R is not significantly different from VV ECMO.

A bi-centric experience of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2 R) for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the main reason for ICU admission following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Extracorporeal CO₂ removal (ECCO₂R) can be used as an adjunct to mechanical ventilation in patients with severe hypercapnia but has not been assessed in HSCT recipients. Retrospective analysis of all allogeneic HSCT recipients ≥18 years treated with ECCO₂R at two HSCT centers. 11 patients (m:f = 4:7, median age: 45 [IQR: 32‐58] years) were analyzed. Acute leukemia was the underlying hematologic malignancy in all patients. The time from HSCT to ICU admission was 37 [8‐79] months, and 9/11 (82%) suffered from chronic graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) with lung involvement. Pneumonia was the most frequent reason for ventilatory decompensation (n = 9). ECCO₂R was initiated for severe hypercapnia (P_aCO₂: 96 [84‐115] mm Hg; pH: 7.13 [7.09‐7.27]) despite aggressive mechanical ventilation (invasive, n = 9; non‐invasive, n = 2). ECCO₂R effectively resolved blood gas disturbances in all patients, but only 2/11 (18%) could be weaned off ventilatory support, and one (9%) patient survived hospital discharge. Progressive respiratory and multiorgan dysfunction were the main reasons for treatment failure. ECCO₂R was technically feasible but resulted in a low survival rate in our cohort. A better understanding of the prognosis of ARF in patients with chronic GVHD and lung involvement is necessary before its use can be reconsidered in this setting.

The use of extracorporeal CO2 removal in acute respiratory failure

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation and protective mechanical ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients induce hypercapnic respiratory acidosis.

Main text

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) aims to eliminate blood CO₂ to fight against the adverse effects of hypercapnia and related acidosis. Hypercapnia has deleterious extrapulmonary consequences, particularly for the brain. In addition, in the lung, hypercapnia leads to: lower pH, pulmonary vasoconstriction, increases in right ventricular afterload, acute cor pulmonale. Moreover, hypercapnic acidosis may further damage the lungs by increasing both nitric oxide production and inflammation and altering alveolar epithelial cells. During an exacerbation of COPD, relieving the native lungs of at least a portion of the CO₂ could potentially reduce the patient's respiratory work, Instead of mechanically increasing alveolar ventilation with MV in an already hyperinflated lung to increase CO₂ removal, the use of ECCO₂R may allow a decrease in respiratory volume and respiratory rate, resulting in improvement of lung mechanic. Thus, the use of ECCO₂R may prevent noninvasive ventilation failure and allow intubated patients to be weaned off mechanical ventilation. In ARDS patients, ECCO₂R may be used to promote an ultraprotective ventilation in allowing to lower tidal volume, plateau (Pplat) and driving pressures, parameters that have identified as a major risk factors for mortality. However, although ECCO₂R appears to be effective in improving gas exchange and possibly in reducing the rate of endotracheal intubation and allowing more protective ventilation, its use may have pulmonary and hemodynamic consequences and may be associated with complications.

Conclusion

In selected patients, ECCO₂R may be a promising adjunctive therapeutic strategy for the management of patients with severe COPD exacerbation and for the establishment of protective or ultraprotective ventilation in patients with ARDS without prognosis-threatening hypoxemia.

The use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a narrative review

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation induces hypercapnic respiratory acidosis. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) aims to eliminate blood carbon dioxide (CO2) in order to reduce adverse effects from hypercapnia and the related acidosis. Hypercapnia has deleterious extra-pulmonary consequences in increasing intracranial pressure and inducing and/or worsening right heart failure. During COPD exacerbation, the use of ECCO2R may improve the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in terms of CO2 removal, decrease respiratory rate and reduce dynamic hyperinflation and intrinsic positive end expiratory pressure, which all contribute to increasing dead space. Moreover, ECCO2R may prevent NIV failure while facilitating the weaning of intubated patients from mechanical ventilation. In this review of the literature, the authors will present the current knowledge on the pathophysiology related to COPD, the principles of the ECCO2R technique and its role in acute and severe decompensation of COPD. However, despite technical advances, there are only case series in the literature and few prospective studies to clearly establish the role of ECCO2R in acute and severe COPD decompensation.

ECMO without anticoagulation in patients with disease-related severe thrombocytopenia: Feasible but futile?

Severe thrombocytopenia poses a high risk for bleeding thus representing a relative contraindication for anticoagulation and therefore extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We herein report on a series of immunocompromised patients with severe thrombocytopenia undergoing long-term ECMO without systemic anticoagulation. We retrospectively identified seven adult patients with anticoagulation withdrawal for ≥3 days (range 5-317) during venovenous ECMO therapy due to thrombocytopenia < 50 G/L treated in a university-affiliated hospital from January 2013 to April 2017. All ECMO systems used were heparin coated. Overall, 530 ECMO days were observed, 404 (76%) of them without systemic anticoagulation. Platelet count during ECMO treatment was 24 G/L (median, range 1-138), ECMO duration was 35 days (5-317), and ECMO was run without any anticoagulation for 20 days (5-317). Altogether, five clotting events were seen leading to oxygenator exchanges. Bleeding was common including one fatal intracerebral hemorrhage. Altogether, 29 platelet concentrates per patient (7-207) were administered, which correspond to 0.8 per day (0.6-1.3). One patient survived ICU and hospital. In patients with thrombocytopenia, ECMO can be run without anticoagulation even for considerably long periods of time. Bleeding remains common, while clotting events seem to be rare. However, prognosis of this patient population undergoing ECMO support seems grim.

Intermittent extracorporeal CO2 removal in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a fiction or an option

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Aim of this article is to review evidence recently generated on the application of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring mechanical ventilation (invasive and non invasive) for hypercapnic respiratory failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

To date, the paucity of evidences on ECCO2R to decrease the rate of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure and to wean hypercapnic patients from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) precludes to systematically apply this technology to COPD patients.

SUMMARY

Although several efforts have been made to reduce invasiveness and to improve the efficiency of extracorporeal systems, further randomized studies are needed to assess the effects of this technique on both short-term and long-term clinical outcomes.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) has been proposed as an adjunctive intervention to avoid worsening respiratory acidosis, thereby preventing or shortening the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This review will present a comprehensive summary of the pathophysiological rationale and clinical evidence of ECCO2R in patients suffering from severe COPD exacerbations.

An extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) device operating at hemodialysis blood flow rates

Background

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) systems have gained clinical appeal as supplemental therapy in the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory injuries with low tidal volume or non-invasive ventilation. We have developed an ultra-low-flow ECCO₂R device (ULFED) capable of operating at blood flows comparable to renal hemodialysis (250 mL/min). Comparable operating conditions allow use of minimally invasive dialysis cannulation strategies with potential for direct integration to existing dialysis circuitry.

Methods

A carbon dioxide (CO₂) removal device was fabricated with rotating impellers inside an annular hollow fiber membrane bundle to disrupt blood flow patterns and enhance gas exchange. In vitro gas exchange and hemolysis testing was conducted at hemodialysis blood flows (250 mL/min).

Results

In vitro carbon dioxide removal rates up to 75 mL/min were achieved in blood at normocapnia (pCO₂ = 45 mmHg). In vitro hemolysis (including cannula and blood pump) was comparable to a Medtronic Minimax oxygenator control loop using a time-of-therapy normalized index of hemolysis (0.19 ± 0.04 g/100 min versus 0.12 ± 0.01 g/100 min, p = 0.169).

Conclusions

In vitro performance suggests a new ultra-low-flow extracorporeal CO₂ removal device could be utilized for safe and effective CO₂ removal at hemodialysis flow rates using simplified and minimally invasive connection strategies.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) in patients with acute respiratory failure

PURPOSE

To review the available knowledge related to the use of ECCO₂R as adjuvant strategy to mechanical ventilation (MV) in various clinical settings of acute respiratory failure (ARF).

METHODS

Expert opinion and review of the literature.

RESULTS

ECCO₂R may be a promising adjuvant therapeutic strategy for the management of patients with severe exacerbations of COPD and for the achievement of protective or ultra-protective ventilation in patients with ARDS without life-threatening hypoxemia. Given the observational nature of most of the available clinical data and differences in technical features and performances of current devices, the balance of risks and benefits for or against ECCO₂R in such patient populations remains unclear CONCLUSIONS: ECCO₂R is currently an experimental technique rather than an accepted therapeutic strategy in ARF-its safety and efficacy require confirmation in clinical trials.

[Extracorporeal CO2 removal as an alternative to tracheotomy in a patient with extubation failure]

We report a patient with chest trauma who was admitted to the ICU after surgery. As he fulfilled protocol-based criteria, he was extubated 7 days after admission. However, despite intermittent non-invasive ventilation, the patient had to be re-intubated on day 10 owing to progressive hypercapnia. We decided to support the patient with a mid-flow veno-venous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂‑R) system instead of a tracheotomy. Sufficient CO₂ removal was established with a blood flow of 1.5 l/min and the patient was successfully extubated within a few hours. After 5 days of ECCO₂‑R the patient could be weaned and transferred to a general ward in a stable condition.

[Extracorporeal lung support-news and future developments]

Technical developments as well as the experiences during the 2009 influenza pandemia have led to an increased and safer use of extracorporeal gas exchange. Indications are expanding as new systems with the main goal of CO₂ elimination have entered the market, thus, broadening the range of systems in addition to classic "high flow" extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), although evidence for many suggested indications is sparse or lacking. However, recent research has shed light into the pathophysiology and interaction between the organism and the extracorporeal systems. Upcoming indications like avoiding intubation and mechanical ventilation or reducing invasiveness of ventilation are being evaluated. Novel data and technical advances will keep perspectives of extracorporeal gas exchange dynamic and exciting.

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) in respiratory deficiency and current investigations on its improvement: a review

The implementation of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) as one of the extracorporeal life support system is getting more attention today. Thus, the objectives of this paper are to study the clinical practice of commercial ECCO₂R system, current trend of its development and also the perspective on future improvement that can be done to the existing ECCO₂R system. The strength of this article lies in its review scope, which focuses on the commercial ECCO₂R therapy in the market based on membrane lung and current investigation to improve the efficiency of the ECCO₂R system, in terms of surface modification by carbonic anhydrase (CA) immobilization technique and respiratory electrodialysis (R-ED). Our methodology approach involves the identification of relevant published literature from PubMed and Web of Sciences search engine using the terms Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal (ECCO₂R), Extracorporeal life support, by combining terms between ECCO₂R and CA and also ECCO₂R with R-ED. This identification only limits articles in English language. Overall, several commercial ECCO₂R systems are known and proven safe to be used in patients in terms of efficiency, safety and risk of complication. In addition, CA-modified hollow fiber for membrane lung and R-ED are proven to have good potential to be applied in conventional ECCO₂R design. The detailed technique and current progress on CA immobilization and R-ED development were also reviewed in this article.

Extracorporeal CO2 removal as bridge to lung transplantation in life-threatening hypercapnia

In patients awaiting lung transplantation (LTX), adequate gas exchange may not be sufficiently achieved by mechanical ventilation alone if acute respiratory decompensation arises. We report on 20 patients with life-threatening hypercapnia who received extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2-R) by means of the interventional lung assist (ILA®, Novalung) as bridge to LTX. The most common underlying diagnoses were bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, respectively. The type of ILA was pumpless arteriovenous or pump-driven venovenous (ILA activve®, Novalung) in 10 patients each. ILA bridging was initiated in 15 invasively ventilated and five noninvasively ventilated patients, of whom one had to be intubated prior to LTX. Hypercapnia and acidosis were effectively corrected in all patients within the first 12 h of ILA therapy: PaCO2 declined from 109 (70-146) to 57 (45-64) mmHg, P < 0.0001; pH increased from 7.20 (7.06-7.28) to 7.39 (7.35-7.49), P < 0.0001. Four patients were switched to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation due to progressive hypoxia or circulatory failure. Nineteen patients (95%) were successfully transplanted. Hospital and 1-year survival was 75 and 72%, respectively. Bridging to LTX with ECCO2-R delivered by arteriovenous pumpless or venovenous pump-driven ILA is feasible and associated with high transplantation and survival rates.