The Starling Relationship and Veno-Arterial ECMO: Ventricular Distension Explained. ASAIO J. 2018;64:497-501. [PMID: 29076945 DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000000660]

Steady Flow Left Ventricle Unloading Is Superior to Pulsatile Pressure Augmentation Venting During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) shunts venous blood to the systemic arterial circulation to provide end-organ perfusion while increasing afterload that may impede left ventricle (LV) ejection and impair cardiac recovery. To maintain flow across the aortic valve and reduce risk of lethal clot formation, secondary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are increasingly used despite limited understanding of their effects on cardiac function. This study sought to quantify the effects of VA-ECMO and combined with either intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) or percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD) on LV physiologic state and perfusion metrics in a porcine model of acute cardiogenic shock. Shock was induced through serial left anterior descending artery microbead embolization followed by initiation of VA-ECMO support and then placement of either IABP or pVAD. Hemodynamic measurements, LV pressure-volume loops, and carotid artery blood flow were evaluated before and after institution of combined MCS. The IABP decreased LV end-diastolic pressure by a peak of 15% while slightly increasing LV stroke work compared with decreases of more than 60% and 50% with the pVAD, respectively. The pVAD also demonstrated increased coronary perfusion and systemic pressure gradients in comparison to the IABP. Combined support with VA-ECMO and pVAD improves cardiovascular state in comparison to IABP.

Left ventricular unloading to facilitate ventricular remodelling in heart failure: A narrative review of mechanical circulatory support

Heart failure represents a dynamic clinical challenge with the continuous rise of a multi-morbid and ageing population. Yet, the evolving nature of mechanical circulatory support offers a variety of means to manage candidates who might benefit from such interventions. This narrative review focuses on the role of the main mechanical circulatory support devices, such as ventricular assist device, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella and TandemHeart, in the physiological process of ventricular unloading and remodelling in heart failure, highlighting their characteristics, mechanism and clinical outcomes. The outcome measures described include physiological changes (i.e., stroke volume or preload and afterload), intracardiac pressure (i.e., end-diastolic pressure) and extracardiac pressure (i.e., pulmonary capillary wedge pressure). Overall, all the above mechanical circulatory support strategies can facilitate the unloading of the ventricular failure through different mechanisms, which subsequently affects the ventricular remodelling process. These physiological changes start immediately after ventricular assist device implantation. The devices are indicated in different but overlapping populations and operate in distinctive ways; yet, they have evidenced performance to a favourable standard to improve cardiac function in heart failure, although this proved variable for different devices, and further high-quality trials are vital to assess their clinical outcomes further. Both Impella and TandemHeart are indicated mainly in cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention patients; at the time the literature was evaluated, both devices were found to yield a significant improvement in haemodynamics but not in survival. Nevertheless, the choice of device strategy should be based on individual patient factors, including indication, to optimize clinical outcomes.

Haemodynamic implications of VA-ECMO vs. VA-ECMO plus Impella CP for cardiogenic shock in a large animal model

AIMS

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with profound left ventricular (LV) failure is associated with inadequate LV emptying. To unload the LV, VA-ECMO can be combined with Impella CP (ECMELLA). We hypothesized that ECMELLA improves cardiac energetics compared with VA-ECMO in a porcine model of cardiogenic shock (CS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Land-race pigs (weight 70 kg) were instrumented, including a LV conductance catheter and a carotid artery Doppler flow probe. CS was induced with embolization in the left main coronary artery. CS was defined as reduction of ≥50% in cardiac output or mixed oxygen saturation (SvO2) or a SvO2 < 30%. At CS VA-ECMO was initiated and embolization was continued until arterial pulse pressure was <10 mmHg. At this point, Impella CP was placed in the ECMELLA arm. Support was maintained for 4 h. CS was induced in 15 pigs (VA-ECMO n = 7, ECMELLA n = 8). At time of CS MAP was <45 mmHg in both groups, with no difference at 4 h (VA-ECMO 64 mmHg ± 11 vs. ECMELLA 55 mmHg ± 21, P = 0.08). Carotid blood flow and arterial lactate increased from CS and was similar in VA-ECMO and ECMELLA [239 mL/min ± 97 vs. 213 mL/min ± 133 (P = 0.6) and 5.2 ± 3.3 vs. 4.2 ± 2.9 mmol/ (P = 0.5)]. Pressure-volume area (PVA) was significantly higher with VA-ECMO compared with ECMELLA (9567 ± 1733 vs. 6921 ± 5036 mmHg × mL/min × 10-3, P = 0.014). Total diureses was found to be lower in VA-ECMO compared with ECMELLA [248 mL (179-930) vs. 506 mL (418-2190); P = 0.005].

CONCLUSIONS

In a porcine model of CS, we found lower PVA, with the ECMELLA configuration compared with VA-ECMO, indicating better cardiac energetics without compromising systemic perfusion.

Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a time-sensitive and hemodynamically complex syndrome with a broad spectrum of etiologies and clinical presentations. Despite contemporary therapies, CS continues to maintain high morbidity and mortality ranging from 35 to 50%. More recently, burgeoning observational research in this field aimed at enhancing the early recognition and characterization of the shock state through standardized team-based protocols, comprehensive hemodynamic profiling, and tailored and selective utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices has been associated with improved outcomes. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiology of CS, novel phenotypes, evolving definitions and staging systems, currently available pharmacologic and device-based therapies, standardized, team-based management protocols, and regionalized systems-of-care aimed at improving shock outcomes. We also explore opportunities for fertile investigation through randomized and non-randomized studies to address the prevailing knowledge gaps that will be critical to improving long-term outcomes.

Systemic Hemodynamics, Cardiac Mechanics, and Signaling Pathways Induced by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Cardiogenic Shock Model

Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Although considered life-saving, peripheral VA-ECMO may also be responsible for intracardiac hemodynamic changes, including left ventricular overload and dysfunction. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also increase myocardial wall stress and stroke work, possibly affecting the cellular cardioprotective and apoptosis signaling pathways, and thus the infarct size. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of increasing the peripheral VA-ECMO blood flow (25-100% of the baseline cardiac output) on systemic and cardiac hemodynamics in a closed-chest CS model. Upon completion of the experiment, the hearts were removed for assessment of infarct size, histology, apoptosis measurements, and phosphorylation statuses of p38 and protein Kinase B (Akt), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinases (ERK-MAPK). Peripheral VA-ECMO restored systemic perfusion but induced a significant and blood flow-dependent increase in left ventricular preload and afterload. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation did not affect infarct size but significantly decreased p38-MAPK phosphorylation and cardiac myocyte apoptosis in the border zone.

Concomitant use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and percutaneous microaxial assist device support for cardiogenic shock

Objectives

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) with concomitant percutaneous microaxial left ventricular assist device support is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with this support strategy have not been well described.

Methods

This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with CS due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with VA-ECMO with concomitant percutaneous microaxial left ventricular assist device support from December 2020 to January 2023.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included (AMI-CS, n = 20, and ADHF-CS, n = 24). Patients with AMI-CS and ADHF-CS had similar survival at 90 days postdischarge (P = .267) with similar destinations after support (P = .220). Patients with AMI-CS initially supported with VA-ECMO were less likely to survive 90 days postdischarge (P = .038) when compared with other cohorts. Limb ischemia and acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in patients presenting with AMI-CS (P =.013; P = .030). Subanalysis of ADHF-CS patients into acute-on-chronic decompensated HF and de novo HF demonstrated no difference in survival or destination.

Conclusions

VA-ECMO with concomitant percutaneous microaxial left ventricular assist device support can be used to successfully manage patients with CS. There is no difference in survival or destination for AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with this support strategy. AMI-CS patients with initial VA-ECMO support have increased mortality in comparison to other cohorts. Future multicenter studies are required to fully analyze the differences between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with this support strategy.

Case Report: Correlation between pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and left-ventricular diastolic pressure during treatment with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Background

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is often used as a surrogate for left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients (LVEDP) who are on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. However, the correlation between PCWP and LVEDP is not clear in the setting of V-A ECMO usage. We sought to evaluate this correlation in this case series.

Methods

Patients were referred to our cardiac catheterization laboratory for invasive hemodynamic studies to assess their readiness for VA-ECMO decannulation. All patients underwent simultaneous left and right heart catheterization. Using standard techniques, we measured PCWP and LVEDP simultaneously. Continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile ranges. The correlation between PCWP and LVEDP was evaluated using simple linear regression and reported as R2.

Results

Four patients underwent invasive hemodynamic studies 4 (2.5, 7) days after VA-ECMO cannulation. All four patients had suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest and had been put on VA-ECMO. At the baseline level of VA-ECMO flow of 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) L/min, the median LVEDP and PCWP were 6 (4, 7.5) mmHg and 12 (6.5, 16) mmHg, respectively. At the lowest level of VA-ECMO flow of 1.9 (1.6, 2.0) L/min, the median LVEDP and PCWP was 13.5 (8.5, 16) mmHg and 15 (13, 18) mmHg, respectively. There was a poor correlation between the simultaneously measured PCWP and LVEDP (R2 = 0.03, p = 0.66).

Conclusions

The PCWP may not correlate well with LVEDP in patients treated with VA-ECMO, particularly at high levels of VA-ECMO support.

Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock

Background

VA-ECMO with concomitant Impella support (ECpella) is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with ECpella support have not been well-described.

Methods

This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with ECpella from December 2020 to January 2023. Primary outcomes included 90-day survival post-discharge and destination after support. Secondary outcomes included complications post-ECpella support.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included (AMI-CS, n = 20, and ADHF-CS, n = 24). Patients with AMI-CS and ADHF-CS had similar survival 90 days post-discharge (p = .267) with similar destinations after ECpella support (p = .220). Limb ischemia and acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in patients presenting with AMI-CS (p=.013; p = .030). Patients with initial Impella support were more likely to survive ECpella support and be bridged to transplant (p=.033) and less likely to have a cerebrovascular accident (p=.016). Sub-analysis of ADHF-CS patients into acute-on-chronic decompensated heart failure and de novo heart failure demonstrated no difference in survival or destination.

Conclusion

ECpella can be used to successfully manage patients with CS. There is no difference in survival or destination for AMI-CS and ADHF-CS in patients with ECpella support. Patients with initial Impella support are more likely to survive ECpella support and bridge to transplant. Future multicenter studies are required to fully analyze the differences between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with ECpella support.

Transvalvular Unloading Mitigates Ventricular Injury Due to Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Whether extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with Impella, known as EC-Pella, limits cardiac damage in acute myocardial infarction remains unknown. The authors now report that the combination of transvalvular unloading and ECMO (EC-Pella) initiated before reperfusion reduced infarct size compared with ECMO alone before reperfusion in a preclinical model of acute myocardial infarction. EC-Pella also reduced left ventricular pressure-volume area when transvalvular unloading was applied before, not after, activation of ECMO. The authors further observed that EC-Pella increased cardioprotective signaling but failed to rescue mitochondrial dysfunction compared with ECMO alone. These findings suggest that ECMO can increase infarct size in acute myocardial infarction and that EC-Pella can mitigate this effect but also suggest that left ventricular unloading and myocardial salvage may be uncoupled in the presence of ECMO in acute myocardial infarction. These observations implicate mechanisms beyond hemodynamic load as part of the injury cascade associated with ECMO in acute myocardial infarction.

Role of acute mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is a state of low cardiac output that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A considerable proportion of patients with cardiogenic shock respond poorly to medical management and require acute mechanical circulatory support (AMCS) devices to improve tissue perfusion as well as to support the heart. In the last two decades, many new AMCS devices have been introduced to support the right, left, and both ventricles. All these devices vary in terms of the support they provide to the body and heart, mechanism of functioning, method of insertion, and adverse events. In this review, we compare and contrast the available percutaneous and surgically placed AMCS devices used in cardiogenic shock and discuss the associated clinical and hemodynamic data to make a conscious decision about choosing a device.

Unloading the Left Ventricle in Venoarterial ECMO: In Whom, When, and How?

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides cardiorespiratory support to patients in cardiogenic shock. This comes at the cost of increased left ventricle (LV) afterload that can be partly ascribed to retrograde aortic flow, causing LV distension, and leads to complications including cardiac thrombi, arrhythmias, and pulmonary edema. LV unloading can be achieved by using an additional circulatory support device to mitigate the adverse effects of mechanical overload that may increase the likelihood of myocardial recovery. Observational data suggest that these strategies may improve outcomes, but in whom, when, and how LV unloading should be employed is unclear; all techniques require balancing presumed benefits against known risks of device-related complications. This review summarizes the current evidence related to LV unloading with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Sensitivity of ventricular systolic function to afterload during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

AIMS

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) increases afterload to the injured heart and may hinder myocardial recovery. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of left ventricular (LV) systolic function to the afterload effects of peripheral V-A ECMO during the acute and delayed stages of acute myocardial dysfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 46 adult patients who were supported by peripheral V-A ECMO between April 2019 and June 2021 were analysed. Serial cardiac performance parameters were measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on mean day 1 ± 1 of V-A ECMO initiation (n = 45, 'acute phase') and mean day 4 ± 2 of V-A ECMO initiation (n = 36, 'delayed phase'). Measurements were obtained at 100%, 120%, and 50% of ECMO target blood flow (TBF). LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) significantly improved from -6.1 (-8.9 to -4.0)% during 120% TBF to -8.8 (-11.5 to -6.0)% during 50% TBF (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of LV GLS to changes in ECMO flow was significantly greater in the acute phase of myocardial injury compared with the delayed phase [median (IQR) percentage change: 72.7 (26.8-100.0)% vs. 22.5 (14.9-43.8)%, P < 0.001]. Findings from other echocardiographic parameters including LV ejection fraction [43.0 (29.1-56.8)% vs. 22.8 (9.2-42.2)%, P = 0.012] and LV outflow tract velocity-time integral [45.8 (18.6-58.7)% vs. 24.2 (12.6-34.0)%, P = 0.001] were similar. A total of 24 (52.2%) patients were weaned off ECMO successfully.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that LV systolic function was significantly more sensitive to the afterload effects of V-A ECMO during the acute stage of myocardial dysfunction compared with the delayed phase. Understanding the evolution of the heart-ECMO interaction over the course of acute myocardial dysfunction informs the clinical utility of echocardiographic assessment in patients on V-A ECMO.

Effects of Add-On Left Ventricular Assist Device to Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Refractory Cardiac Arrest in a Porcine Model

This study evaluated the effects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in combination with a percutaneous adjunctive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a porcine model during 60 minutes of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). Twenty-four anesthetized swine were randomly allocated into three groups given different modes of circulatory assist: group 1: ECMO 72 ml/kg/min and LVAD; group 2: ECMO 36 ml/kg/min and LVAD; and group 3: ECMO 72 ml/kg/min. During CA and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), mean left ventricular pressure (mLVP) was lower in group 1 (p = 0.013) and in group 2 (p = 0.003) versus group 3. Mean aortic pressure (mAP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) were higher in group 1 compared with the other groups. In group 3, mean pulmonary artery flow (mPAf) was lower versus group 1 (p = 0.003) and group 2 (p = 0.039). If the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved after defibrillation, up to 180 minutes of unsupported observation followed. All subjects in groups 1 and 3, and 5 subjects in group 2 had ROSC. All subjects in group 1, five in group 2 and four in group 3 had sustained cardiac function after 3 hours of spontaneous circulation. Subjects that did not achieve ROSC or maintained cardiac function post-ROSC had lower mAP (p < 0.001), CPP (p = 0.002), and mPAf (p = 0.004) during CA and ECPR. Add-on LVAD may improve hemodynamics compared with ECMO alone during refractory CA but could not substitute reduced ECMO flow. Increased mAP and CPP could be related to ROSC rate and sustained cardiac function. Increased mLVP was related to poor post-ROSC cardiac function.

Impact of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Flow on Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is used to provide cardiopulmonary support in cardiogenic shock; however, high extracorporeal flow may increase left ventricular (LV) afterload leading to LV distention and intracardiac stasis. It is unclear how ECMO flow affects patient outcomes and complications related to ECMO. Retrospective review of patients at a single institution placed on VA ECMO from 2007 to 2018 was performed. Patients were divided into full flow (flow index > 2.2 L/min/m2) and partial flow (flow index < 2.2 L/min/m2) groups. In-hospital mortality and markers of end-organ perfusion were compared between groups balanced for risk factors using propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting. ECMO-related complications such as LV distention, limb ischemia, and bleeding were recorded. There were 488 patients included, 405 (83%) in the partial flow group, and 83 (17%) in the full flow group. No major differences in age, gender, or comorbidities were found. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between groups (51% vs. 55%, p = 0.59). At 72 hours post-ECMO initiation, there was no difference in the change in renal, hepatic function, or lactate from baseline nor in the rates of continuous venoveno hemofiltration initiation (p = 0.41). There was a trend towards the decreased incidence of LV distention requiring LV vent placement in the partial flow group (12% vs. 7%, p = 0.16). Compared with full flow VA ECMO, partial flow VA ECMO in carefully selected patients results in similar in-hospital mortality and provides similar end-organ perfusion for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock.

Atrial Septostomy for Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock: Animal Model

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to quantify and understand the unloading effect of percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) in acute cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO).

BACKGROUND

In CS treated with VA ECMO, increased left ventricular (LV) afterload is observed that commonly interferes with myocardial recovery or even promotes further LV deterioration. Several techniques for LV unloading exist, but the optimal strategy and the actual extent of such procedures have not been fully disclosed.

METHODS

In a porcine model (n = 11; weight 56 kg [53-58 kg]), CS was induced by coronary artery balloon occlusion (57 minutes [53-64 minutes]). Then, a step-up VA ECMO protocol (40-80 mL/kg/min) was run before and after percutaneous BAS was performed. LV pressure-volume loops and multiple hemoglobin saturation data were evaluated. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess individual variable differences.

RESULTS

Immediately after BAS while on VA ECMO support, LV work decreased significantly: pressure-volume area, end-diastolic pressure, and stroke volume to ∼78% and end-systolic pressure to ∼86%, while superior vena cava and tissue oximetry did not change. During elevating VA ECMO support (40-80 mL/kg/min) with BAS vs without BAS, we observed 1) significantly less mechanical work increase (122% vs 172%); 2) no end-diastolic volume increase (100% vs 111%); and 3) a considerable increase in end-systolic pressure (134% vs 144%).

CONCLUSIONS

In acute CS supported by VA ECMO, atrial septostomy is an effective LV unloading tool. LV pressure is a key component of LV work load, so whenever LV work reduction is a priority, arterial pressure should carefully be titrated low while maintaining organ perfusion.

Left Ventricular Unloading during Extracorporeal Life Support: Current Practice

Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is a powerful tool that can provide complete cardiopulmonary support for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. However, VA-ECLS increases left ventricular afterload resulting in greater myocardial oxygen demand, which can impair myocardial recovery and worsen pulmonary edema. These complications can be ameliorated by various LV venting strategies to unload the LV. Evidence suggests that LV venting improves outcomes in VA-ECLS, but there is a paucity of randomized trials to help guide optimal strategy and the timing of venting. In this review, we discuss the available evidence regarding LV venting in VA-ECLS, explain important hemodynamic principles involved, and propose a practical approach to LV venting in VA-ECLS.

SEDAR/SECCE ECMO management consensus document

ECMO is an extracorporeal cardiorespiratory support system whose use has been increased in the last decade. Respiratory failure, postcardiotomy shock, and lung or heart primary graft failure may require the use of cardiorespiratory mechanical assistance. In this scenario perioperative medical and surgical management is crucial. Despite the evolution of technology in the area of extracorporeal support, morbidity and mortality of these patients continues to be high, and therefore the indication as well as the ECMO removal should be established within a multidisciplinary team with expertise in the area. This consensus document aims to unify medical knowledge and provides recommendations based on both the recent bibliography and the main national ECMO implantation centres experience with the goal of improving comprehensive patient care.

Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Acute Myocardial Infarct Size Reduction: Meta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis of preclinical studies that tested left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy for reducing myocardial infarct size in experimental acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Twenty-six articles were included with a total of 488 experimental animal subjects. The meta-analysis showed that infarct size was significantly decreased by LVAD support compared to control animals (SDM, - 2.19; 95% CI, - 2.70 to - 1.69; P < 0.001). The meta-regression analysis demonstrated a high degree of heterogeneity associated with time from coronary artery occlusion to LVAD support, which correlated positively with infarct size. Subgroup analysis suggested smaller infarct size in LVAD therapies that withdrew blood from left heart than those from right heart. The proportion of left ventricular support relative to total cardiac output was positively correlated with infarct size reduction in Impella studies. Thus, early initiation of LVAD after ischemia and effective left ventricular venting may be important factors to reduce infarct size in AMI.

ECMO Assistance during Mechanical Ventilation: Effects Induced on Energetic and Haemodynamic Variables

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Simulation in cardiovascular medicine may help clinicians understand the important events occurring during mechanical ventilation and circulatory support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant number of patients have required hospital admission to tertiary referral centres for concomitant mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Nevertheless, the management of ventilated patients on circulatory support can be quite challenging. Therefore, we sought to review the management of these patients based on the analysis of haemodynamic and energetic parameters using numerical simulations generated by a software package named CARDIOSIM©.

METHODS

New modules of the systemic circulation and ECMO were implemented in CARDIOSIM© platform. This is a modular software simulator of the cardiovascular system used in research, clinical and e-learning environment. The new structure of the developed modules is based on the concept of lumped (0-D) numerical modelling. Different ECMO configurations have been connected to the cardiovascular network to reproduce Veno-Arterial (VA) and Veno-Venous (VV) ECMO assistance. The advantages and limitations of different ECMO cannulation strategies have been considered. We have used literature data to validate the effects of a combined ventilation and ECMO support strategy.

RESULTS

The results have shown that our simulations reproduced the typical effects induced during mechanical ventilation and ECMO assistance. We focused our attention on ECMO with triple cannulation such as Veno-Ventricular-Arterial (VV-A) and Veno-Atrial-Arterial (VA-A) configurations to improve the hemodynamic and energetic conditions of a virtual patient. Simulations of VV-A and VA-A assistance with and without mechanical ventilation have generated specific effects on cardiac output, coupling of arterial and ventricular elastance for both ventricles, mean pulmonary pressure, external work and pressure volume area.

CONCLUSION

The new modules of the systemic circulation and ECMO support allowed the study of the effects induced by concomitant mechanical ventilation and circulatory support. Based on our clinical experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, numerical simulations may help clinicians with data analysis and treatment optimisation of patients requiring both mechanical ventilation and circulatory support.

Right-Left Ventricular Interaction in Left-Sided Heart Failure With and Without Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support-A Simulation Study

Left ventricular (LV) dilatation is commonly seen with LV failure and is often aggravated during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). In this context, the intricate interaction between left and right heart function is considered to be of pivotal importance, yet mechanistically not well understood. We hypothesize that a preserved or enhanced right heart contractility causes increased LV loading both with and without VA ECMO. A closed-loop in-silico simulation model containing the cardiac chambers, the pericardium, septal interactions, and the pulmonary and systemic vascular systems with an option to connect a simulated VA ECMO circuit was developed. Right ventricular contractility was modified during simulation of severe LV failure with and without VA ECMO. Left atrial pressures increased from 14.0 to 23.8 mm Hg without VA ECMO and from 18.4 to 27.0 mm Hg under VA ECMO support when right heart contractility was increased between end-systolic elastance 0.1 and 1.0 mm Hg/ml. Left-sided end-diastolic volumes increased from 125 to 169 ml without VA ECMO and from 150 to 180 ml with VA ECMO. Simulations demonstrate that increased diastolic loading of the LV may be driven by increased right ventricular contractility and that left atrial pressures cannot be interpreted as a reflection of the degree of LV dysfunction and overload without considering right ventricular function. Our study illustrates that modelling and computer simulation are important tools to unravel complex cardiovascular mechanisms underlying the right-left heart interdependency both with and without mechanical circulatory support.

Trendelenburg maneuver predicts fluid responsiveness in patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of fluid responsiveness during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support is crucial. The aim of this study was to investigate whether changes in left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (ΔVTI), induced by a Trendelenburg maneuver, could predict fluid responsiveness during VA-ECMO.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted in patients with VA-ECMO support. The protocol included four sequential steps: (1) baseline-1, a supine position with a 15° upward bed angulation; (2) Trendelenburg maneuver, 15° downward bed angulation; (3) baseline-2, the same position as baseline-1, and (4) fluid challenge, administration of 500 mL gelatin over 15 min without postural change. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at each step. Fluid responsiveness was defined as ΔVTI of 15% or more, after volume expansion.

RESULTS

From June 2018 to December 2019, 22 patients with VA-ECMO were included, and a total of 39 measurements were performed. Of these, 22 measurements (56%) met fluid responsiveness. The R² of the linear regression was 0.76, between ΔVTIs induced by Trendelenburg maneuver and the fluid challenge. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ΔVTI induced by Trendelenburg maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness was 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.98], with a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 60-95%), and specificity of 88% (95% CI 64-99%), at a best threshold of 10% (95% CI 6-12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in VTI induced by the Trendelenburg maneuver could effectively predict fluid responsiveness in VA-ECMO patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553459 (the TEMPLE study). Registered on May 30, 2018.

Left Ventricular Unloading Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From an International, Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used to treat cardiogenic shock. However, VA-ECMO might hamper myocardial recovery. The Impella unloads the left ventricle. This study aimed to evaluate whether left ventricular unloading in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO was associated with lower mortality.

METHODS

Data from 686 consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO with or without left ventricular unloading using an Impella at 16 tertiary care centers in 4 countries were collected. The association between left ventricular unloading and 30-day mortality was assessed by Cox regression models in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Left ventricular unloading was used in 337 of the 686 patients (49%). After matching, 255 patients with left ventricular unloading were compared with 255 patients without left ventricular unloading. In the matched cohort, left ventricular unloading was associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.98]; P=0.03) without differences in various subgroups. Complications occurred more frequently in patients with left ventricular unloading: severe bleeding in 98 (38.4%) versus 45 (17.9%), access site-related ischemia in 55 (21.6%) versus 31 (12.3%), abdominal compartment in 23 (9.4%) versus 9 (3.7%), and renal replacement therapy in 148 (58.5%) versus 99 (39.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this international, multicenter cohort study, left ventricular unloading was associated with lower mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO, despite higher complication rates. These findings support use of left ventricular unloading in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO and call for further validation, ideally in a randomized, controlled trial.

CPR and ECMO: The Next Frontier

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a first-line therapy for sudden cardiac arrest, while extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has traditionally been used as a means of countering circulatory failure. However, new advances dictate that CPR and ECMO could be complementary for support after cardiac arrest. This review details the emerging science, technology, and clinical application that are enabling the new paradigm of these iconic circulatory support modalities in the setting of cardiac arrest.

Left Ventricle Unloading with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

During veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), the increase of left ventricular (LV) afterload can potentially increase the LV stress, exacerbate myocardial ischemia and delay recovery from cardiogenic shock (CS). Several strategies of LV unloading have been proposed. Systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement included adult patients from studies published between January 2000 and March 2019. The search was conducted through numerous databases. Overall, from 62 papers, 7581 patients were included, among whom 3337 (44.0%) received LV unloading concomitant to VA-ECMO. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 58.9% (4466/7581). A concomitant strategy of LV unloading as compared to ECMO alone was associated with 12% lower mortality risk (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82–0.93; p < 0.0001; I² = 40%) and 35% higher probability of weaning from ECMO (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.21–1.51; p < 0.00001; I² = 38%). In an analysis stratified by setting, the highest mortality risk benefit was observed in case of acute myocardial infarction: RR 0.75; 95%CI 0.68–0.83; p < 0.0001; I² = 0%. There were no apparent differences between two techniques in terms of complications. In heterogeneous populations of critically ill adults in CS and supported with VA-ECMO, the adjunct of LV unloading is associated with lower early mortality and higher rate of weaning.

Veno-arterial mechanical support as bridge to surgery in a patient with severe aortic regurgitation: a case report

In this case report, we describe the successful application of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in a young patient with severe aortic regurgitation caused by a blocked mechanical valve. In this situation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation mechanical support was used as a bridge to the prompt replacement of the diseased valve. Aortic regurgitation is commonly recognized as a contraindication to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support because of the risk of ventricular distension, pulmonary oedema and further organ failure. However, in certain cases and with a rapid decision making, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be used as a bridge to treatment and recovery.

Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation in aortic surgery and dissection: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Very little is known about the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the management of patients undergoing major aortic surgery with particular reference to aortic dissection.

AIM

To review the available literature to determine if there was any evidence.

METHODS

A systematic literature search through PubMed and EMBASE was undertaken according to specific key words.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 29 publications relevant to the subject: 1 brief communication, 1 surgical technique report, 1 invited commentary, 1 retrospective case review, 1 observational study, 4 retrospective reviews, 13 case reports and 7 conference abstracts. A total of 194 patients were included in these publications of whom 77 survived.

CONCLUSION

Although there is no compelling evidence for or against the use of ECMO in major aortic surgery or dissection, it is enough to justify its use in this patient population despite current adverse attitude.

Left ventricular distension and venting strategies for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is an established method of short-term mechanical support for patients in cardiogenic shock, but can create left ventricular (LV) distension. This paper analyzes the physiologic basis of this phenomenon and treatment methods. This is a retrospective review of the existing literature on VA ECMO and LV distension. We undertook a PubMed review of all peer-reviewed papers focusing on VA ECMO, LV distension, and LV venting. We reviewed these papers and synthesized our findings. We also will discuss the various methods of LV venting and venting strategies we use at Columbia. LV distension is becoming an increasingly appreciated aspect of caring for patients on VA ECMO support. The literature demonstrates that the consequences of failing to anticipate, recognize, and treat LV distension are grave, and will worsen an already distended and hypocontractile LV. Myocardial recovery will be hindered, and LV thrombus formation more likely. Early recognition and aggressive management of LV distension is paramount in helping care for this critically ill patient population.

Clinical outcomes of patients receiving prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory support

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, despite increase in ECMO use and duration in patients with respiratory failure. The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of severe acute respiratory failure patients supported with prolonged ECMO for more than 28 days.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2015, all consecutive adult patients with severe acute respiratory failure who underwent ECMO for respiratory support at 16 tertiary or university-affiliated hospitals in South Korea were enrolled retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: short-term group defined as ECMO for ⩽28 days and long-term group defined as ECMO for more than 28 days. In-hospital and 6-month mortalities were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 487 patients received ECMO support for acute respiratory failure during the study period, and the median support duration was 8 days (4-20 days). Of these patients, 411 (84.4%) received ECMO support for ⩽28 days (short-term group), and 76 (15.6%) received support for more than 28 days (long-term group). The proportion of acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease as a cause of respiratory failure was higher in the long-term group than in the short-term group (22.4% versus 7.5%, p < 0.001), and the duration of mechanical ventilation before ECMO was longer (4 days versus 1 day, p < 0.001). The hospital mortality rate (60.8% versus 69.7%, p = 0.141) and the 6-month mortality rate (66.2% versus 74.0%, p = 0.196) were not different between the two groups. ECMO support longer than 28 days was not associated with hospital mortality in univariable and multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Short- and long-term survival rates among patients receiving ECMO support for more than 28 days for severe acute respiratory failure were not worse than those among patients receiving ECMO for 28 days or less.