Improving Outcomes in Bridge-to-Transplant: Extended Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support to Obtain Optimal Donor Lungs for Marginal Recipients

Impact of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridging Duration on Lung Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

We sought to characterize the association between venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) bridging duration and outcomes in patients listed for lung transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database to identify adults (aged ≥18 years) who were listed for lung transplantation between 2016 and 2020 and were bridged with VV-ECMO. Patients were then stratified into groups, determined by risk inflection points, depending on the amount of time spent on pretransplant ECMO: group 1 (≤5 days), group 2 (6-10 days), group 3 (11-20 days), and group 4 (>20 days). Waiting list survival between groups was analyzed using Fine-Gray competing risk models. Posttransplant survival was compared using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of 566 eligible VV-ECMO bridge-to-lung-transplant patients (median age, 54 years, 49% men), 174 (31%), 124 (22%), 130 (23%), and 138 (24%) were categorized as groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Overall, median duration of VV-ECMO was 10 days (interquartile range, 1-211 days), and 178 patients (31%) died on the waiting list. In the Fine-Gray model, compared with group 1, patients bridged with longer ECMO durations in group 2 (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 2.95; 95% CI, 1.63-5.35), group 3 (SHR, 3.96; 95% CI, 2.36-6.63), and group 4 (SHR, 4.33; 95% CI, 2.59-7.22, all P < .001) were more likely to die on the waiting list. Of 388 patients receiving a transplant, pretransplant ECMO duration was not associated with 1-year survival in Cox regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged duration of ECMO bridging was associated with worse waiting list mortality but did not impact survival after lung transplant. Prioritization of very early transplantation may improve waiting list outcomes in this population.

Percutaneous Venopulmonary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Lung Transplantation

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to lung transplant is an infrequent but accepted pathway in patients who have refractory end-stage pulmonary failure. The American Association of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus Guidelines, published in 2023, recommends venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as the initial configuration for those patients who have failed conventional medical therapy, including mechanical ventilation, while waiting for lung transplantation and needing MCS. Alternatively, venoarterial (VA) ECMO can be used in patients with acute right ventricular failure, hemodynamic instability, or refractory respiratory failure. With the advancement in percutaneous venopulmonary (VP) ECMO cannulation techniques, this option is becoming an attractive configuration as bridge to lung transplantation. This configuration enhances stability of the right ventricle, prevents recirculation with direct introduction of pulmonary artery oxygenation, and promotes hemodynamic stability during mobility, rehabilitation, and sedation-weaning trials before lung transplantation. Here, we present a case series of eight percutaneous VP ECMO as bridge to lung transplant with all patients mobilized, awake, and successfully transplanted with survival to hospital discharge.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: Practice patterns and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly relied on to bridge patients with respiratory failure to lung transplantation despite limited evidence for its use in this setting. This study evaluated longitudinal trends in practice patterns, patient characteristics, and outcomes in patients bridged with ECMO to lung transplant.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all adult isolated lung transplant patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database between 2000 and 2019 was performed. Patients were classified as "ECMO" if supported with ECMO at the time of listing or transplantation and "non-ECMO" otherwise. Linear regression was used to evaluate trends in patient demographics during the study period. Trends in mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards modeling, with time period as the primary covariate (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, or 2015-2019) and age, time on the waitlist, and underlying diagnosis as covariates.

RESULTS

The number of patients included were 40,866, of whom 1,387 (3.4%) were classified as ECMO and 39,479 (96.6%) as no ECMO. Average age and initial Lung Allocation Score increased significantly during the study period in both cohorts, but occurred at a slower rate in the ECMO population. The hazard of death was significantly lower in more recent years (2015-2019) for both the ECMO and non-ECMO cohorts (aHR (adjusted hazards ratio) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.96 and aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70-0.79) when compared to the early years (2000-2004) of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplantation survival for patients bridged to transplantation with ECMO demonstrates ongoing improvement despite cannulation of progressively older and sicker patients.

Early experience of a new national lung allocation scheme in the UK based on clinical urgency

INTRODUCTION

A new UK Lung Allocation Scheme (UKLAS) was introduced in 2017, replacing the previous geographic allocation system. Patients are prioritised according to predefined clinical criteria into a three-tier system: the super-urgent lung allocation scheme (SULAS), the urgent lung allocation scheme (ULAS) and the non-urgent lung allocation scheme (NULAS). This study assessed the early impact of this scheme on waiting-list and post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS

A cohort study of adult lung transplant registrations between March 2015 and November 2016 (era-1) and between May 2017 and January 2019 (era-2). Outcomes from registration were compared between eras and stratified by urgency tier and diagnostic group.

RESULTS

During era-1, 461 patients were registered. In era-2, 471 patients were registered (19 (4.0%) SULAS, 82 (17.4%) ULAS and 370 (78.6%) NULAS). SULAS patients were younger (median age 35 vs 50 and 55 for urgent and non-urgent, respectively, p=0.0015) and predominantly suffered from cystic fibrosis (53%) or pulmonary fibrosis (37%). Between eras 1 and 2, the odds of transplantation within 6 months of registration were increased (OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.85, p=0.0142) despite only a 5% increase in transplant activity. Median time-to-transplantation during era-1 was 427 days compared with waiting times in era-2 of 8 days for SULAS, 15 days for ULAS and 585 days for NULAS patients. Waiting-list mortality (15% era-1 vs 13% era-2; p=0.5441) and post-transplant survival at 1 year (81.3% era-1 vs 83.3% era-2; p=0.6065) were similar between eras.

CONCLUSION

The UKLAS scheme prioritises the critically ill and improves transplantation odds. The true impact on waiting-list mortality and post-transplant survival requires further follow-up.

Waitlist Mortality and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridge to Lung Transplant

BACKGROUND

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as bridge to lung transplant has increased. However, little is known about patients placed on ECMO who die while on the waiting list. Using a national lung transplant data set, we investigated variables associated with waitlist mortality of patients bridged to lung transplant.

METHODS

All patients supported on ECMO at time of listing were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Univariable analyses were performed using bias-reduced logistic regression. Cause-specific hazard models were used to determine the effect of variables of interest on hazard of outcomes.

RESULTS

From April 2016 to December 2021, 634 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 445 (70%) were successfully bridged to transplant, 148 (23%) died on the waitlist, and 41 (6.5%) were removed for other reasons. Univariable analysis found associations between waitlist mortality and blood group, age, body mass index, serum creatinine, lung allocation score, days on waitlist, United Network for Organ Sharing region, and being listed at a lower-volume center. Cause-specific hazard models demonstrated that patients at high-volume centers were 24% more likely to survive to transplant and 44% less likely to die on the waitlist. Among patients who were successfully bridged to transplant, there was no difference in survival between low- and high-volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

ECMO is an appropriate strategy to bridge selected high-risk patients to lung transplant. Of those placed on ECMO with intent to transplant, about one quarter may not survive to transplantation. High-risk patients requiring advanced support strategies may be more likely to survive to transplant when bridged at a high-volume center.

COVID-19-Associated Lung Fibrosis: Two Pathways and Two Phenotypes, Lung Transplantation, and Antifibrotics

COVID-19 can be associated with lung fibrosis. Although lung fibrosis after COVID-19 is a relatively rare finding, the mere fact that globally a very large number of patients have had COVID-19 leads to a significant burden of disease. However, patients with COVID-19-associated lung fibrosis have different clinical and radiological features. The aim of this review is to define the different phenotypes of COVID-19-associated lung fibrosis, based on the medical literature. We found that two phenotypes have emerged. One phenotype is COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS); the other phenotype is post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (PCPF). Both phenotypes have different risk factors, clinical, and radiological features, and differ in their pathophysiological mechanisms and prognoses. A long-term follow-up of patients with pulmonary complications after COVID-19 is warranted, even in patients with only discrete fibrosis. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment because currently the literature is scarce, and evidence is only based on small case series or case reports.

Managing pulmonary arterial hypertension: how to select and facilitate successful transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite improvements in available medical therapies, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a progressive, ultimately fatal disorder. Lung transplantation is a viable treatment option for PAH patients with advanced disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent guidelines from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) have updated recommendations regarding time of referral and listing for lung transplantation in PAH. The new guidelines emphasize earlier referral for transplant evaluation to ensure adequate time for proper evaluation and listing. They also incorporate objective risk stratification criteria to assist in decision-making regarding timing of referral and listing. With regards to the transplant procedure, bilateral lung transplantation has largely supplanted heart-lung transplantation as the procedure of choice for transplantation for advanced PAH. Exceptions to this include patients with PAH because of congenital heart disease and those with concurrent LV dysfunction. Use of mechanical support via venoarterial ECMO initiated before transplantation and continued into the early postoperative period is emerging as a standard of care and may help to reduce early posttransplant mortality in this population. There has been increased recognition of the importance of WHO Group 3 pulmonary hypertension. Many of the lessons learned from PAH may be applied when transplanting patients with severe WHO Group 3 pulmonary hypertension.

SUMMARY

Patients with PAH present unique challenges with regards to transplantation that require a therapeutic approach distinct from other lung disorders. Lung transplantations for PAH are high-risk endeavors best performed at centers with expertise in management of both PAH and extracorporeal support.

Taking a Deep Breath: an Examination of Current Controversies in Surgical Procedures in Lung Transplantation

Purpose of Review

This article reviews controversial questions within the field of lung transplantation, with a focus on data generated within the last 3 years. We aim to summarize differing opinions on a selection of topics, including bridge-to-transplantation, intraoperative machine circulatory support, bronchial anastomosis, size mismatch, delayed chest closure, and ex vivo lung perfusion.

Recent Findings

With the growing rate of lung transplantations worldwide and increasing numbers of patients placed on waiting lists, the importance of determining best practices has only increased in recent years. Factors which promote successful outcomes have been identified across all the topics, with certain approaches promoted, such as ambulation in bridge-to-transplant and widespread intraoperative ECMO as machine support.

Summary

While great strides have been made in the operative procedures involved in lung transplantation, there are still key questions to be answered. The consensus which can be reached will be instrumental in further improving outcomes in recipients.

Inpatient Management of the Acutely Decompensating Lung Transplant Candidate

Lung allocation in the US changed nearly 15 years ago from time accrued on the waiting list to disease severity and likelihood of posttransplant survival, represented by the lung allocation score (LAS). Notably, the risk of death within a year plays a stronger role on the score calculation than posttransplant survival. While this change was associated with the intended decrease in waitlist mortality (most recently reported at 14.6%), it was predictable that transplant teams would have to care for increasingly older and complex candidates and recipients. This urgency-based allocation also led centers to routinely consider transplanting patients with higher acuity, often hospitalized and, not infrequently, in the intensive care unit (ICU). According to the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients, from 2009 to 2019, the proportion of lung recipients hospitalized and those admitted to the ICU at the time of transplant increased from 18.9% to 26.8% and from 9.2% to 16.5%, respectively..

Lung Transplantation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

In this review, we discuss the outcomes of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We discuss evidence that suggests that a significant proportion of patients with ARDS develop end-stage lung disease and die of pulmonary complications. In carefully selected patients with permanent lung damage, lung transplant can be a life-saving treatment.

Hospital survival outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients receiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for longer than 28 days: A retrospective study

The successful use of prolonged (ie, >28 days) veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is being increasingly reported. However, limited data are available on its outcomes. This study investigated the outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients on prolonged ECMO support. We retrospectively evaluated 57 patients requiring V-V ECMO for ARDS between 2015 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups according to ECMO duration: (a) ≤28 days group (n = 43, 75%) or (b) >28 days (n = 14, 25%) group. Clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes between these two groups were statistically compared. There were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidity, ARDS etiology, and severity scores between the two groups. However, the mechanical ventilation period before ECMO initiation was significantly longer in the >28 days group than in the ≤28 days group (10.5 days vs. 1 day; P < .05). The incidence of positive bacterial blood culture results during ECMO was significantly higher in the >28 days group than in the ≤28 days group (43% vs. 9%; P < .05). Additionally, the hospital survival rate was significantly lower in the >28 days group than in the ≤28 days ECMO group (21% vs. 60%; P < .05). Prolonged ECMO was associated with worse hospital survival outcomes. Early initiation of ECMO along with meticulous care and appropriate treatment against infection during ECMO could improve the hospital survival of ARDS patients on prolonged ECMO support.

Effects of the duration of bridge to lung transplantation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Background

Although bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly performed, the impact of BTT and its duration on post-transplant outcomes are unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of adult patients who underwent lung or heart-lung transplantation in our institution between January 2008 and December 2018. Data were compared in patients who did (n = 41; BTT) and did not (n = 36; non-BTT) require pre-transplant ECMO support. Data were also compared in patients who underwent short-term (<14 days; n = 21; ST-BTT) and long-term (≥14 days; n = 20; LT-BTT) BTTs.

Results

Among 77 patients included, 51 (66.2%) were male and median age was 53 years. The median bridging time in the BTT group was 13 days (interquartile range [IQR], 7–19 days). Although simplified acute physiologic score II was significantly higher in the BTT group (median, 35; IQR, 31–49 in BTT group vs. median, 12; IQR, 7–19 in non-BTT group; p<0.001), 1-year (73.2% vs. 80.6%; p = 0.361) and 5-year (61.5% vs. 61.5%; p = 0.765) post-transplant survival rates were comparable in both groups. Comparison of ST- and LT-BTT subgroups showed that 1-year (90.5% vs. 55.0%; p = 0.009) and 5-year (73.0% vs. 48.1%; p = 0.030) post-transplant survival rates were significantly higher in ST-BTT group. In age and sex adjusted model, the LT-BTT was an independent risk factor for 1-year post-transplant mortality (hazard ratio, 3.019; 95% confidence interval, 1.119–8.146; p = 0.029), whereas the ST-BTT was not.

Conclusions

Despite the severe illness, the BTT group showed favorable post-transplantation outcomes, particularly those bridged for less than 14 days.

Lung Transplant from ECMO: Current Results and Predictors of Post-transplant Mortality

Purpose of Review

We examined data from the last 5 years describing extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge to lung transplantation. We assessed predictors of survival to transplantation and post-transplant mortality.

Recent Findings

The number of lung transplants performed worldwide is increasing. This is accompanied by an increase in the type of patients being transplanted, including sicker patients with more advanced disease. Consequently, there is an increase in the need for bridging strategies, with varying success. Several predictors of failure have been identified. Major risk factors include retransplantation, other organ dysfunction, and deconditioning.

Summary

ECLS is a risky strategy but necessary for patients who would otherwise die if not bridged to transplantation. The presence of predictors for failure is not a contraindication for bridging. However, major risk factors should be approached cautiously. Other, more minor risk factors may be considered acceptable. More importantly, the strategy should be individualized for each patient to achieve the best possible outcomes.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge vs. non-bridging for lung transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) can achieve a similar survival to non-BTT remains controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the outcomes between ECMO BTT and non-BTT to facilitate better clinical decision-making. Seven databases were searched for eligible studies comparing ECMO BTT and non-BTT. The primary endpoints included survival, intraoperative indicators, postoperative hospitalization indicators, and postoperative complications. Nineteen studies (involving 7061 participants) were included in the final analysis. The outcomes of overall survival, overall survival rate, graft survival rate, in-hospital mortality, postoperative hospital days, postoperative intensive care unit days, postoperative ventilation time, blood transfusion volume, and postoperative complications were all better in the non-BTT group. The total mortality in ECMO bridging was 23.03%, in which the top five causes of death were right heart failure (8.03%), multiple organ failure (7.03%), bleeding (not cranial) (4.67%), cranial bleeding (3.15%), and sepsis (2.90%). In summary, Non-BTT is associated with better survival and fewer complications compared to BTT. When ECMO may be the only option, the patient and medical team need to realize the increased risk of ECMO by complications and survival.

Successful Lung Transplantation After 213 Days of Extracorporeal Life Support: Role of Oxygenator-Right Ventricular Assist Device

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) can successfully support patients with refractory respiratory failure and is widely accepted as a bridge to recovery or bridge to transplantation. However, some problems hinder success. Recirculation, an innate complication of VV ECMO, hamper efficient oxygenation. Right ventricular (RV) failure secondary to respiratory failure is not uncommon and can be reversed by VV ECMO. But there are often times when RV failure gets worse, and since VV ECMO is no longer effective, additional measures are needed. Moreover, peripheral cannulation restricts active rehabilitation leading to weakness and weaning failure. Oxygenator-right ventricular assist device (OxyRVAD) refers any configuration that combines oxygenator and centrifugal pump. Compared to VV ECMO, it has advantages of hemodynamic support, elimination of recirculation, and facilitation of rehabilitation. In the present case, we overcame recirculation and impending RV failure by applying OxyRVAD to patient who was initially managed with VV ECMO. He underwent lung transplantation after about 6 months of OxyRVAD support with active rehabilitation, the longest maintenance period ever known.