1
|
Mayerhöfer T, Joannidis M, Peer A, Perschinka F, Fries D, Mair P, Gasteiger L, Bachler M, Kilo J, Herkner H, Schwameis M, Schellongowski P, Nagler B, Kornfehl A, Staudinger T, Buchtele N. Anticoagulation with argatroban using hemoclot™ targets is safe and effective in CARDS patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An exploratory bi-centric cohort study. Thromb Res 2024; 236:161-166. [PMID: 38452448 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Direct thrombin inhibitors, including argatroban, are increasingly used for anticoagulation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). In many centers activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is used for monitoring, but it can be affected by several confounders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation with argatroban titrated according to diluted thrombin time targets (hemoclot™ assay) compared to anti-Xa guided anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH). METHODS This cohort study included adults at two tertiary care centers who required VV ECMO for severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS). Patients received center-dependent argatroban or UFH for anticoagulation during ECMO. Argatroban was guided following a hemoclot™ target range of 0.4-0.6 μg/ml. UFH was guided by anti-factor Xa (antiXa) levels (0.2-0.3 IU/ml). The primary outcome was safety of argatroban compared to UFH, assessed by time to first clinically relevant bleeding event or death during ECMO. Secondary outcomes included efficacy (time to thromboembolism) and feasibility (proportion of anticoagulation targets within range). RESULTS From 2019 to 2021 57 patients were included in the study with 27 patients (47 %) receiving argatroban and 30 patients (53 %) receiving UFH. The time to the first clinically relevant bleeding or death during ECMO was similar between groups (HR (argatroban vs. UFH): 1.012, 95 % CI 0.44-2.35, p = 0.978). Argatroban was associated with a decreased risk for thromboembolism compared to UFH (HR 0.494 (95 % CI 0.26-0.95; p = 0.034)). The overall proportion of anticoagulation within target ranges was not different between groups (46 % (23-54 %) vs. 46 % (37 %-57 %), p = 0.45). CONCLUSION Anticoagulation with argatroban according to hemoclot™ targets (0.4-0.6 μg/ml) compared to antiXa guided UFH (0.2-0.3 IU/ml) is safe and may prolong thromboembolism-free time in patients with severe ARDS requiring VV ECMO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Mayerhöfer
- Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Joannidis
- Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andreas Peer
- Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Fabian Perschinka
- Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dietmar Fries
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Mair
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lukas Gasteiger
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mirjam Bachler
- Institute for Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine and Health Tourism (ISAG), UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Juliane Kilo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Harald Herkner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Schwameis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Schellongowski
- Department of Medicine I, Intensive Care Unit 13i2, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Nagler
- Department of Medicine I, Intensive Care Unit 13i2, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Kornfehl
- Department of Medicine I, Intensive Care Unit 13i2, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Staudinger
- Department of Medicine I, Intensive Care Unit 13i2, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Nina Buchtele
- Department of Medicine I, Intensive Care Unit 13i2, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|