Challenges of the management of severe hemophilia A with inhibitors: two case reports emphasizing the potential interest of a high-purity human Factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate and individually tailored prophylaxis guided by thrombin-generation test

Surgery with emicizumab prophylaxis for two paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A with inhibitors

Emicizumab is a prophylaxis for patients with severe haemophilia A with and without inhibitor. Despite weekly administration of emicizumab, coagulation states stay below normal value and cannot be assessed by standard haemostasis tests. In our two patients, we used the thrombin-generation assay (endogenous thrombin potential and Peak) to monitor the patient's clotting status. Under emicizumab, it is necessary to add a bypassing agent (BPA) such as rFVIIa (Novoseven) to avoid bleeding before surgery. The BPA dosage was based on a thrombin-generation assay and collegial consultation.

Kaolin, used to trigger coagulation in thrombin generation test, increases sensitivity of the method in hemophilia patients

: Thrombin generation test (TGT) is well established tool to research blood coagulation in plasma of hemophilia patients. Traditionally coagulation in this test is triggered by a tissue factor (TF), an extrinsic coagulation pathway activator. However, it is known that disorders of the intrinsic pathway are most important for coagulation in hemophilia. In this study, we hypothesized that triggering coagulation via the intrinsic pathway could increase a sensitivity of the TGT to monitor hemophilia treatment. The aim of this study was to compare thrombin generation in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors to factor VIII before and after infusion of bypassing agent [recombinant-activated factor VIIa (rVIIa)] using standard activation of coagulation by TF or by kaolin, an activator of coagulation by intrinsic pathway. Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) in nine patients was measured. ETP before (ETP0) and 60 min after rVIIa infusion (ETP60) were compared. It was shown that ETP0 and ETP60 were significantly different when using any coagulation activator (paired Student's t test, P = 0.017 and 3.7 × 10 for clotting activation by TF and kaolin, respectively). The ratios of ETP60/ETP0 were 1.2 ± 0.2 or 30.0 ± 22.4 (mean ± SD, n = 9) for coagulation activated by TF or kaolin, respectively, and were significantly different (paired Student's t test, P < 0.005). The TGT clearly distinguished between ETP0 and ETP60 in the case of any coagulation activator, but ETP increasing after rVIIa infusion was significantly higher when activated with kaolin. This provided increased sensitivity of this method for monitoring hemophilia therapy.

A century of heparin: past, present and future

Heparin was discovered around 1922 by Howell (Baltimore) and was further developed by the teams of Best (Toronto) and Jorpes (Stockholm). Kakkar (London) propagated its routine use for the prevention of postoperative thrombosis from 1971 onwards. The discovery of low molecular weight heparins (1976, Johnson, London) and their development in the subsequent years led to the present arsenal of clinically useful drugs. In 1976, three teams independently found that a specific structure in heparin binds tightly to antithrombin. This enabled the teams of Lindahl (Stockholm) and Casu (Milan) to determine the pentasaccharide structure responsible for this binding and Petitou, from the Choay team (Paris), to synthesize it (1983). It was found (Olson and others) that heparin facilitates the interaction between antithrombin and a clotting enzyme by allosteric changes in the antithrombin (important for factor Xa) and by facilitating the approach of the enzyme to antithrombin via its "sliding" along the heparin molecule (important for thrombin). Antithrombin action therefore requires a minimum length of seven sugar units next to the pentasaccharide whereas anti-factor Xa action does not. The effect of heparin is almost entirely due to anti-thrombin action (B≐guin), so anti-factor Xa activity does not reflect the concentration of anticoagulant heparin. The anticoagulant effect is poorly reflected by the activated partial thromboplastin time. Because present clinical use is based on the latter tests, it is not generally known that the individual response to heparin shows an extremely wide variation. Individualization of heparin dosage is likely to improve clinical results.