Novel enzyme immunoassay system for simultaneous detection of six subclasses of antiphospholipid antibodies for differential diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

The Weight of IgA Anti-β2glycoprotein I in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Pathogenesis: Closing the Gap of Seronegative Antiphospholipid Syndrome

The specific value of IgA Anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies (aB2GP1) in the diagnosis and management of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is still controversial and a matter of active debate. The relevance of the IgA aB2GP1 isotype in the pathophysiology of APS has been increasingly studied in the last years. There is well know that subjects with multiple positive APS tests are at increased risk of thrombosis and/or miscarriage. However, these antibodies are not included in the 2006 APS classification criteria. Since 2010 the task force of the Galveston International Congress on APS recommends testing IgA aB2GP1 isotype in patients with APS clinical criteria in the absence of criteria antibodies. In this review, we summarize the molecular and clinical “state of the art” of the IgA aB2GP in the context of APS. We also discuss some of the characteristics that may help to evaluate the real value of the IgA aB2GP1 determination in basic research and clinical practice. The scientific community should be aware of the importance of clarifying the role of IgA aB2GP1 in the APS diagnosis.

Immunoglobulin A Isotype of Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does Not Provide Added Value for the Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a Chinese Population

Objective

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies. However, the relationship between the immunoglobulin (Ig) A isotype of aPL positivity and its clinical utility in APS diagnosis is controversial. Presently, we determine the clinical utility of IgA-aPL from consecutive patients in a large cohort from the Chinese population and patients with APS whose aPL profiles were obtained.

Methods

The detection of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β₂ glycoprotein-Ⅰ (aβ₂GPⅠ) antibodies of the IgA/IgG/IgM isotype by paramagnetic particle chemiluminescent immunoassay was carried out in sera from 7293 subjects. 153 primary APS (PAPS) patients and 59 patients with secondary APS (SAPS) were included in this study.

Results

In total, 1,082 out of 7,293 (2.55%) subjects had a positive IgA-aPL test, and the prevalence of isolated IgA-aPL was 0.29% (21/7,293) in the general population. The prevalence of IgA-aPL in the PAPS patients was 12.42% (19/153); however, only one patient (0.65%) presented with isolated IgA-aPL. Fifty (25.9%) of the SAPS had IgA-aPL, none of whom lacked IgG/IgM-aPL. The combination of the IgA isotype and the IgG/IgM isotype did not increase the diagnostic performance when compared with the IgG/IgM isotype of aCL or aβ₂GPⅠ, respectively. IgA-aPL was not associated with clinical manifestation in patients with APS.

Conclusion

Isolated IgA-aPL is rare in the general population as well as in patients with APS. Whether in the laboratory or in clinical practice, the presence of IgA-aPL does not provide added value for the diagnosis of APS in the Chinese population.

Prevalence of Novel Candidate Sjögren Syndrome Autoantibodies in the Penn Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Cohort

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of novel candidate autoantibodies associated with Sjögren syndrome (SS) and their ability to identify those with SS among participants with dry eye enrolled in the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) study at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn).

METHODS

All participants previously underwent a full ocular and systemic evaluation for possible SS as part of the SICCA study. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect IgG, IgA, and IgM autoantibodies to salivary protein 1 (SP-1), parotid secretory protein (PSP), and carbonic anhydrase 6 from previously banked baseline serum samples from SICCA study participants enrolled at Penn. The prevalence rate of each autoantibody, calculated by considering the presence of any isotype as antibody positive, was compared between participants with dry eye with SS (n = 81) or without SS (n = 129) using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of SP-1 IgM autoantibodies was higher in those with SS compared with those without SS (14% vs. 5%; P = 0.03). Similarly, the prevalence of PSP IgA autoantibodies was higher in those with SS compared with non-SS dry eye participants (21% vs. 11%; P = 0.048). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of carbonic anhydrase 6 autoantibodies between those with or without SS (15% vs. 20%; P = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

In the Penn SICCA cohort, SP-1 IgM and PSP IgA autoantibodies were more prevalent in the serum of SS-related dry eye participants compared with those without SS. Further longitudinal studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings.