Differences in coronary plaque morphology between East Asian and Western White patients: an optical coherence tomography study

Intravascular lithotripsy during percutaneous coronary intervention: current concepts

INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is commonly encountered by interventional cardiologists. Severe CAC may impair stent delivery or result in stent underexpansion, stent thrombosis and/or in-stent restenosis (ISR). Multiple tools have been developed to help overcome the challenges associated with CAC and improve outcomes for these patients. Intravascular shockwave lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel therapy that uses acoustic pressure waves for the modification of CAC.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the growing body of evidence to support the safety and efficacy of IVL in the setting of de novo severely calcified coronary arteries prior to stenting. We also discuss international real world experience with the coronary IVL system. This includes the use of IVL in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), ISR and in combination with other tools for calcium modification.

EXPERT OPINION

IVL is a safe and effective therapy that results in the fracture of coronary calcium and facilitates optimal stent delivery and expansion. Longer term follow up is essential to shed light on the durability and late outcomes of an IVL strategy. Randomised control trials are warranted to compare IVL to alternative methods of calcium modification and to explore further the use of IVL for ACS.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can overcome the intrinsic limitations of coronary angiography for lesion assessment and stenting. IVUS improves outcomes of patients presenting with stable or complex coronary artery disease, but dedicated data on the impact of IVUS-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains scarce.

METHODS

We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar for studies that compared clinical outcomes for IVUS- versus angio-guided PCI in patients with AMI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and the secondary endpoint major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Nine studies (8 observational, 1 RCT) with a total of 838.902 patients (796.953 angio-guided PCI, 41.949 IVUS-guided PCI) were included. In patients with AMI, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (pooled RR: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82; p < 0.01), MACE (pooled RR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99; p = 0.04) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (pooled RR: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95; p < 0.01). In the subset of patients presenting with ST-segment elevation, IVUS-guided PCI remained associated with a reduced risk for both all-cause mortality (pooled RR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95, p = 0.01) and MACE (pooled RR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing IVUS- versus angio-guided PCI in patients with AMI, showing a beneficial effect of IVUS-guided PCI on all-cause mortality, MACE and TVR. Results of ongoing dedicated prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Comparison of coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression in East Asians and Caucasians by serial coronary computed tomographic angiography: A PARADIGM substudy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate potential differences in plaque progression (PP) between in East Asians and Caucasians as well as to determine clinical predictors of PP in East Asians.

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated differences in cardiovascular risk factors as well as plaque burden and progression across different ethnic groups.

METHODS

The study comprised 955 East Asians (age 60.4 ​± ​9.3 years, 50.9% males) and 279 Caucasians (age 60.4 ​± ​8.6 years, 74.5% males) who underwent two serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) studies over a period of at least 24 months. Patients were enrolled and analyzed from the PARADIGM (Progression of AtheRosclerotic PlAque DetermIned by Computed TomoGraphic Angiography IMaging) registry. After propensity-score matching, plaque composition and progression were compared between East Asian and Caucasian patients. Within East Asians, the plaque progression group (defined as plaque volume at follow-up CCTA minus plaque volume at baseline CCTA> 0) was compared to the no PP group to determine clinical predictors for PP in East Asians.

RESULTS

In the matched cohort, baseline volumes of total plaque as well as all plaque subtypes were comparable. There was a trend towards increased annualized plaque progression among East Asians compared to Caucasians (18.3 ​± ​24.7 ​mm³/year vs 16.6 ​mm³/year, p ​= ​0.054). Among East Asians, 736 (77%) had PP. East Asians with PP had more clinical risk factors and higher plaque burden at baseline (normalized total plaque volume of144.9 ​± ​233.3 ​mm³ vs 36.6 ​± ​84.2 ​mm³ for PP and no PP, respectively, p ​< ​0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that baseline normalized plaque volume (OR: 1.10, CI: 1.10-1.30, p ​< ​0.001), age (OR: 1.02, CI: 1.00-1.04, p ​= ​0.023) and body mass index (OR: 2.24, CI: 1.01-1.13, p ​= ​0.024) were all predictors of PP in East Asians. Clinical events, driven mainly by percutaneous coronary intervention, were higher among the PP group with a total of 124 (16.8%) events compared to 22 (10.0%) in the no PP group (p ​= ​0.014).

CONCLUSION

East Asians and Caucasians had comparable plaque composition and progression. Among East Asians, the PP group had a higher baseline plaque burden which was associated with greater PP and increased clinical events.

Intravascular Lithotripsy for Vessel Preparation in Severely Calcified Coronary Arteries Prior to Stent Placement - Primary Outcomes From the Japanese Disrupt CAD IV Study

BACKGROUND

Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) delivers acoustic pressure waves to modify calcium, enhance vessel compliance and optimize stent deployment. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of IVL treatment of de novo stenoses involving severely calcified coronary vessels in a Japanese population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Disrupt CAD IV (NCT04151628) was a prospective, multicenter study designed for Japanese regulatory approval of coronary IVL (SWM-1234). The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days. The primary effectiveness endpoint was procedural success (residual stenosis <50% by QCA without in-hospital MACE). Noninferiority analyses for the primary endpoints were performed by comparing the CAD IV cohort with a propensity-matched historical IVL control group. Patients (intent-to-treat, n=64) were enrolled from 8 centers in Japan. Severe calcification by core laboratory assessment was present in all lesions, with a calcified length of 49.8±15.5 mm and a calcium angle of 257.9±78.4° by optical coherence tomography. Primary endpoints were achieved with non-inferiority demonstrated for freedom from 30-day MACE (CAD IV: 93.8% vs. Control: 91.2%, P=0.008), and procedural success (CAD IV: 93.8% vs. Control: 91.6%, P=0.007). No perforations, abrupt closures, or slow/no-reflow events occurred at any time during the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary IVL demonstrated high procedural success with low MACE rates in severely calcified lesions in a Japanese population.

Ethnic Differences in the Pathobiology of Acute Coronary Syndromes Between Asians and Whites

Ethnic differences in the pathobiology of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have not been systematically studied. We compared the underlying mechanisms of ACS between Asians and Whites. ACS patients with the culprit lesion imaged by optical coherence tomography were included. Patients were stratified into ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation-ACS (NSTE-ACS), and baseline characteristics, underlying mechanisms of ACS, and culprit plaque characteristics were compared between Asians and Whites. Of 1,225 patients, 1,019 were Asian (567 STEMI and 452 NSTE-ACS) and 206 were White (71 STEMI and 135 NSTE-ACS). Asians had more diabetes and hypertension among STEMI patients; among NSTE-ACS patients, Asians had higher prevalence of diabetes and renal insufficiency, and lower prevalence of hyperlipidemia. There were no differences in the incidence of plaque rupture, plaque erosion and calcified plaque between Asians and Whites with STEMI (61.2%, 28.6%, 10.2% vs 46.5%, 38.0%, 15.5%, respectively, p = 0.055). Among NSTE-ACS patients, there was a significant difference between Asians and Whites (40.5%, 47.6%, 11.9% vs 27.4%, 48.9%, 23.7%, respectively, p = 0.001). After adjustment for clinical confounders, the risk of plaque rupture (p = 0.713), plaque erosion (p = 0.636), and calcified plaque (p = 0.986) was similar between the groups with STEMI. In NSTE-ACS patients, the only difference was an increased risk of calcified plaque in Whites (odds ratio: 2.125, 95% confidence interval: 1.213 to 3.723, p = 0.008). In conclusion, after adjustment for clinical confounders, Asian and White patients presenting with STEMI and NSTE-ACS showed similar underlying mechanisms of ACS, except for a higher risk of calcified plaque in Whites with NSTE-ACS.