Are all fluids bad for the kidney?

Controlled Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients and the Potential Role of Venous Bagging in Acute Kidney Injury

A very low incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) has been observed in COVID-19 patients purposefully treated with early pressure support ventilation (PSV) compared to those receiving mainly controlled ventilation. The prevention of subdiaphragmatic venous congestion through limited fluid intake and the lowering of intrathoracic pressure is a possible and attractive explanation for this observed phenomenon. Both venous congestion, or "venous bagging", and a positive fluid balance correlate with the occurrence of AKI. The impact of PSV on venous return, in addition to the effects of limiting intravenous fluids, may, at least in part, explain this even more clearly when there is no primary kidney disease or the presence of nephrotoxins. Optimizing the patient-ventilator interaction in PSV is challenging, in part because of the need for the ongoing titration of sedatives and opioids. The known benefits include improved ventilation/perfusion matching and reduced ventilator time. Furthermore, conservative fluid management positively influences cognitive and psychiatric morbidities in ICU patients and survivors. Here, it is hypothesized that cranial lymphatic congestion in relation to a more positive intrathoracic pressure, i.e., in patients predominantly treated with controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), is a contributing risk factor for ICU delirium. No studies have addressed the question of how PSV can limit AKI, nor are there studies providing high-level evidence relating controlled mechanical ventilation to AKI. For this perspective article, we discuss studies in the literature demonstrating the effects of venous congestion leading to AKI. We aim to shed light on early PSV as a preventive measure, especially for the development of AKI and ICU delirium and emphasize the need for further research in this domain.

2023 Update on Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adult Patients: Management in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Sepsis/septic shock is a life-threatening and time-dependent condition that requires timely management to reduce mortality. This review aims to update physicians with regard to the main pillars of treatment for this insidious condition.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched from inception with special attention paid to November 2021-January 2023.

RESULTS

The management of sepsis/septic shock is challenging and involves different pathophysiological aspects, encompassing empirical antimicrobial treatment (which is promptly administered after microbial tests), fluid (crystalloids) replacement (to be established according to fluid tolerance and fluid responsiveness), and vasoactive agents (e.g., norepinephrine (NE)), which are employed to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg and reduce the risk of fluid overload. In cases of refractory shock, vasopressin (rather than epinephrine) should be combined with NE to reach an acceptable level of pressure control. If mechanical ventilation is indicated, the tidal volume should be reduced from 10 to 6 mL/kg. Heparin is administered to prevent venous thromboembolism, and glycemic control is recommended. The efficacy of other treatments (e.g., proton-pump inhibitors, sodium bicarbonate, etc.) is largely debated, and such treatments might be used on a case-to-case basis.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of sepsis/septic shock has significantly progressed in the last few years. Improving knowledge of the main therapeutic cornerstones of this challenging condition is crucial to achieve better patient outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of tetrastarches in surgery and trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130 is a frequently used fluid to replace intravascular losses during surgery or trauma. In the past years, several trials performed in critically ill patients have raised questions regarding the safety of this product. Our aim in this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 6% HES during surgery and in trauma.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018100379). We included 85 fully published articles from 1980 to June 2018 according to the protocol and three additional recent articles up to June 2020 in English, French, German, and Spanish reporting on prospective, randomised, and controlled clinical trials applying volume therapy with HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42, including combinations with crystalloids, to patients undergoing surgery. Comparators were albumin, gelatin, and crystalloids only. A meta-analysis could not be performed for the two trauma studies as there was only one study that reported data on endpoints of interest.

RESULTS

Surgical patients treated with HES had lower postoperative serum creatinine (P<0.001) and showed no differences in renal dysfunction, renal failure, or renal replacement therapy. Although there was practically no further difference in the colloids albumin or gelatin, the use of HES improved haemodynamic stability, reduced need for vasopressors (P<0.001), and decreased length of hospital stay (P<0.001) compared with the use of crystalloids alone.

CONCLUSIONS

HES was shown to be safe and efficacious in the perioperative setting. Results of the present meta-analysis suggest that when used with adequate indication, a combination of intravenous fluid therapy with crystalloids and volume replacement with HES as colloid has clinically beneficial effects over using crystalloids only.

Prise en charge du transplanté rénal en réanimation

La transplantation rénale est la thérapeutique de choix de l’insuffisance rénale chronique au stade ultime, son usage est de plus en plus large. Les progrès réalisés dans les traitements immunosuppresseurs ont permis une amélioration de la durée de vie du greffon, mais au prix d’une augmentation des complications cardiovasculaires et infectieuses. Environ 5 % des transplantés rénaux présentent des complications sévères qui nécessitent une prise en charge intensive. Elles sont principalement de cause infectieuse et dominées par la défaillance respiratoire aiguë. L’insuffisance rénale aiguë est commune, elle affecte la fonction du greffon à court et long termes. La prise en charge en réanimation de ces complications doit prendre en compte le terrain particulier du transplanté rénal et les effets délétères de l’immunosuppression, condition nécessaire à une amélioration de la mortalité qui reste à plus de 30 %.

Does fluid management affect the occurrence of acute kidney injury?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the potential impact of different fluid management strategies on renal outcomes in critically ill and postoperative patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Uncritical fluid administration may induce renal compartment syndrome and renal venous congestion, which contribute to kidney dysfunction. In more than 5000 randomized surgical or septic patients, goal-directed therapy did not reduce fluid accumulation, acute kidney injury (AKI) development or need for renal replacement therapy. In contrast to synthetic colloids, which increase the risk of AKI, albumin solutions and balanced crystalloids appear well tolerated from a renal standpoint in medical and surgical patients requiring intensive care. However, any clinical benefits compared with 0.9% sodium chloride have not yet been demonstrated.

SUMMARY

Although synthetic colloids should be avoided in patients with or at risk of AKI, the renal efficacy of using albumin solutions and/or balanced crystalloids as alternatives to 0.9% sodium chloride in high-risk patients is yet to be confirmed or refuted. Improved goal-directed protocols, which minimize unnecessary fluid administration and reduce potentially harmful effects of fluid overload, need to be developed and tested.

Does Fluid Type and Amount Affect Kidney Function in Critical Illness?

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common, although commonly used clinical diagnostic markers are imperfect. Intravenous fluid administration remains a cornerstone of therapy worldwide, but there is minimal evidence of efficacy for the use of fluid bolus therapy outside of specific circumstances, and emerging evidence associates fluid accumulation with worse renal outcomes and even increased mortality among critically ill patients. Artificial colloid solutions have been associated with harm, and chloride-rich solutions may adversely affect renal function. Large trials to provide guidance regarding the optimal fluid choices to prevent or ameliorate AKI, and promote renal recovery, are urgently required.

Comparison of acid-base and electrolyte changes following administration of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 in a saline and a polyionic solution in anaesthetized dogs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.42) in either a buffered, electrolyte-balanced (HES-BAL) or saline (HES-SAL) carrier solution on electrolyte concentrations and acid-base parameters in healthy anaesthetized dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomised clinical study.

ANIMALS

A group of 40 client-owned dogs undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgical procedures or diagnostic imaging.

METHODS

During anaesthesia, dogs were intravenously administered 15 mL kg^-1 of either HES-SAL (n = 20) or HES-BAL (n = 20) over 30-40 minutes. Jugular blood samples were analysed before (T₀) and 5 minutes (T₅), 1 hour (T₆₀) and 3 hours (T₁₈₀) after fluid administration. Sodium, potassium, chloride, ionised calcium, phosphate, albumin, pH, venous pCO₂, base excess (BE), bicarbonate and anion gap were determined and strong ion difference (SID) and total quantity of weak nonvolatile acids were calculated for each time point.

RESULTS

Chloride was significantly increased at T₅, T₆₀ and T₁₈₀ compared with T₀ after HES-SAL, and was significantly greater after HES-SAL than after HES-BAL at T₅ (p = 0.042). Ionised calcium was significantly decreased at T₅ compared with T₀ after HES-SAL, and was significantly lower after HES-SAL than after HES-BAL at T₅ (p < 0.001). Bicarbonate was significantly lower after HES-SAL than after HES-BAL at T₅ (p = 0.004) and T₆₀ (p = 0.032). BE was significantly lower after HES-SAL than after HES-BAL at T₅ (p < 0.001) and T₆₀ (p = 0.007). SID was significantly decreased after HES-SAL at T₅ and T₆₀ compared with T₀, and was significantly lower after HES-SAL than after HES-BAL at T₅ (p = 0.027). Mean electrolyte and acid-base parameters remained within or marginally outside of reference intervals.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Changes in both groups were minor and short-lived with either fluid in healthy individuals, but might become clinically relevant with higher fluid doses or in critically ill dogs.

Are postoperative intravenous fluids in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy a necessity? A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Intravenous (IV) fluid therapy should be individualized according to each patient's weight, disease, and comorbidities, as well as the type and duration of the operative procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents one of the most common, short-duration operations; thus, the aim of this study was to assess the necessity of postoperative administration of IV fluids.

METHOD

A randomized clinical trial with patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to control group (IV fluids at the surgeon's discretion) and study group (no IV fluids after the operation). Body weight and composition, total intravenous fluids, urinary output, creatinine levels, and the presence of thirst and hunger were assessed. Costs related to the administration of postoperative IV fluids were measured.

RESULTS

The study and control groups were similar with regard to sex distribution, age, and general characteristics. There was a significant difference in the amount of infused IV fluids (1,600 mL vs 3,000 mL), directly related to the amount offered postoperatively to the control group. Weight, extracellular water, and urinary output (1,257 ± 736 mL vs 888 ± 392 mL; P < .05) were increased in the control group, and this was positively correlated with the volume of infused fluids (r = 0.333). There were no differences in creatinine levels, thirst, hunger, and well-being features. An average of 10.7 minutes per patient of nursing time was required for IV administration. Cost related to IV fluids was increased in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative intravenous fluids are not necessary in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and their use is associated with increased nursing time and costs.

Anesthesia for Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation

Kidney transplants are the most common solid organ abdominal transplant and are occasionally performed simultaneously with pancreas transplants in diabetic patients. Preoperative evaluation of potential transplant recipients should focus on the potential for occult cardiovascular disease while also screening for other signs of end-organ dysfunction. Intraoperatively, it is of utmost importance to ensure adequate graft perfusion to limit the risk of postoperative graft dysfunction or rejection. Postoperative care of the kidney or pancreas transplant patient should focus on ensuring normalization of volume status, electrolyte concentrations, and glycemic control.

Balanced crystalloids for septic shock resuscitation

Timely fluid administration is crucial to maintain tissue perfusion in septic shock patients. However, the question concerning which fluid should be used for septic shock resuscitation remains a matter of debate. A growing body of evidence suggests that the type, amount and timing of fluid administration during the course of sepsis may affect patient outcomes. Crystalloids have been recommended as the first-line fluids for septic shock resuscitation. Nevertheless, given the inconclusive nature of the available literature, no definitive recommendations about the most appropriate crystalloid solution can be made. Resuscitation of septic and non-septic critically ill patients with unbalanced crystalloids, mainly 0.9% saline, has been associated with a higher incidence of acid-base balance and electrolyte disorders and might be associated with a higher incidence of acute kidney injury. This can result in greater demand for renal replacement therapy and increased mortality. Balanced crystalloids have been proposed as an alternative to unbalanced solutions in order to mitigate their detrimental effects. Nevertheless, the safety and effectiveness of balanced crystalloids for septic shock resuscitation need to be further addressed in a well-designed, multicenter, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.

Renal perfusion in sepsis: from macro- to microcirculation

The pathogenesis of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury is complex and likely involves perfusion alterations, a dysregulated inflammatory response, and bioenergetic derangements. Although global renal hypoperfusion has been the main target of therapeutic interventions, its role in the development of renal dysfunction in sepsis is controversial. The implications of renal hypoperfusion during sepsis probably extend beyond a simple decrease in glomerular filtration pressure, and targeting microvascular perfusion deficits to maintain tubular epithelial integrity and function may be equally important. In this review, we provide an overview of macro- and microcirculatory dysfunction in experimental and clinical sepsis and discuss relationships with kidney oxygenation, metabolism, inflammation, and function.