Recent developments in electronic alerts for acute kidney injury

Optimization of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Time Definitions Using the Electronic Health Record: A First Step in Automating In-Hospital AKI Detection

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury (AKI) definitions were evaluated for cases detected and their respective outcomes using expanded time windows to 168 h. AKI incidence and outcomes with expanded time intervals were identified in the electronic health records (EHRs) from 126,367 unique adult hospital admissions (2012-2014) and evaluated using multivariable logistic regression with bootstrap sampling. The incidence of AKI detected was 7.4% (n = 9357) using a 24-h time window for both serum creatinine (SCr) criterion 1a (≥0.30 mg/dL) and 1b (≥50%) increases from index SCr, with additional cases of AKI identified: 6963 from 24-48 h.; 2509 for criterion 1b from 48 h to 7 days; 3004 cases (expansion of criterion 1a and 1b from 48 to 168 h). Compared to patients without AKI, adjusted hospital days increased if AKI (criterion 1a and 1b) was observed using a 24-h observation window (5.5 days), 48-h expansion (3.4 days), 48-h to 7-day expansion (6.5 days), and 168-h expansion (3.9 days); all are p < 0.001. Similarly, the adjusted risk of in-hospital death increased if AKI was detected using a 24-h observation window (odds ratio (OR) = 16.9), 48-h expansion (OR = 5.5), 48-h to 7-day expansion (OR = 4.2), and 168-h expansion (OR = 1.6); all are p ≤ 0.01. Expanding the time windows for both AKI SCr criteria 1a and 1b standardizes and facilitates EHR AKI detection, while identifying additional clinically relevant cases of in-hospital AKI.

The influence of multiple episodes of acute kidney injury on survival and progression to end stage kidney disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are common syndromes associated with significant morbidity, mortality and cost. The extent to which repeated AKI episodes may cumulatively affect the rate of progression of all-cause CKD has not previously been investigated. In this study, we explored the hypothesis that repeated episodes of AKI increase the rate of renal functional deterioration loss in patients recruited to a large, all-cause CKD cohort.

Methods

Patients from the Salford Kidney Study (SKS) were considered. Application of KDIGO criteria to all available laboratory measurements of renal function identified episodes of AKI. A competing risks model was specified for four survival events: Stage 1 AKI; stage 2 or 3 AKI; dialysis initiation or transplant before AKI event; death before AKI event. The model was adjusted for patient age, gender, smoking status, alcohol intake, diabetic status, cardiovascular co-morbidities, and primary renal disease. Analyses were performed for patients’ first, second, and third or more AKI episodes.

Results

A total of 48,338 creatinine measurements were available for 2287 patients (median 13 measures per patient [IQR 6–26]). There was a median age of 66.8years, median eGFR of 28.4 and 31.6% had type 1 or 2 diabetes. Six hundred and forty three (28.1%) patients suffered one or more AKI events; 1000 AKI events (58% AKI 1) in total were observed over a median follow-up of 2.6 years [IQR 1.1–3.2]. In patients who suffered an AKI, a second AKI was more likely to be a stage 2 or 3 AKI than stage 1 [HR 2.04, p 0.01]. AKI events were associated with progression to RRT, with multiple episodes of AKI progressively increasing likelihood of progression to RRT [HR 14.4 after 1 episode of AKI, HR 28.4 after 2 episodes of AKI]. However, suffering one or more AKI events was not associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Conclusions

AKI events are associated with more rapid CKD deterioration as hypothesised, and also with a greater severity of subsequent AKI. However, our study did not find an association of AKI with increased mortality risk in this CKD cohort.

Acute Kidney Injury in Western Countries

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent and is associated with poor outcomes, including increased mortality, higher risk of chronic kidney disease, and prolonged hospital lengths of stay. The epidemiology of AKI mainly derives from studies performed in Western high-income countries. More limited data are available from Western low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) located in Central and South America.

SUMMARY

In this review, we summarize the most recent data on the epidemiology of AKI in Western countries, aiming to contrast results from industrialized high-income countries with LMICs. The global picture of AKI in LMICs is not as well characterized as in the USA and Europe. In addition, in some LMICs, the epidemiology of AKI may vary depending on the region and socioeconomic status, which contributes to the difficulty of getting a better portrait of the clinical condition. In low-income regions and tropical countries, AKI is frequently attributed to diarrhea, infections, nephrotoxins, as well as obstetric complications. As opposed to the situation in high-income countries, access to basic care in LMICs is limited by economic constraints, and treatment is often delayed due to late presentation and recognition of the condition, which contribute to worse outcomes. In addition, dialysis is often not available or must be paid by patients, which further restricts its use.

KEY MESSAGES

There are great disparities in the epidemiology of AKI between Western high-income countries and Western LMICs. In LMICs, education and training programs should increase the public awareness of AKI and improve preventive and basic treatments to improve AKI outcomes.

FACTS FROM EAST AND WEST

(1) More than 90% of the patients recruited in AKI studies using KDIGO-equivalent criteria originate from North America, Europe, or Oceania, although these regions represent less than a fifth of the global population. However, the pooled incidence of AKI in hospitalized patients reaches 20% globally with moderate variance between regions. (2) The lower incidence rates observed in Asian countries (except Japan) may be due to a poorer recognition rate, for instance because of less systematically performed serum creatinine tests. (3) AKI patients in South and Southeastern Asia are younger than in East Asia and Western countries and present with fewer comorbidities. (4) Asian countries (and to a certain extent Latin America) face specific challenges that lead to AKI: nephrotoxicity of traditional herbal and less strictly regulated nonprescription medicines, environmental toxins (snake, bee, and wasp venoms), and tropical infectious diseases (malaria and leptospirosis). A higher incidence and less efficient management of natural disasters (particularly earthquakes) are also causes of AKI that Western countries are less likely to encounter. (5) The incidence of obstetric AKI decreased globally together with an improvement in socioeconomic levels particularly in China and India in the last decades. However, antenatal care and abortion management must be improved to reduce AKI in women, particularly in rural areas. (6) Earlier nephrology referral and better access to peritoneal dialysis should improve the outcome of AKI patients.