Fat mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis is not associated with increased risk of Barrett esophagus

Risk factors for Barrett's esophagus: Recent advances

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the most common malignant tumor of the esophagus in the West. During the past few decades, its morbidity has been increasing in China. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is defined as the replacement of normal squamous epithelium in the lower esophagus by metaplasia of columnar epithelium. BE is closely related to the occurrence of EAC. Knowledge regarding the risk factors for the occurrence and development of BE is of great significance for early screening and diagnosis of BE and prevention of EAC. In this paper, we review the clinical, demographics-related, lifestyle-related, and medications-related risk factors for BE to provide more valuable scientific evidence for the prevention and treatment of BE.

Global burden and epidemiology of Barrett oesophagus and oesophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer is a global health problem; in 2018 there were more than 572,000 people newly diagnosed with oesophageal cancer worldwide. There are two main histological subtypes of oesophageal cancer, oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and there has been a dramatic shift in its epidemiology. While the incidence of EAC and its precursor lesion, Barrett oesophagus, has increased in Western populations over the past four decades, the incidence of ESCC has declined in most parts of the world over the same period. ESCC still accounts for the vast majority of all oesophageal cancer cases diagnosed worldwide each year. Prognosis for patients with oesophageal cancer is strongly related to stage at diagnosis. As most patients are diagnosed with late-stage disease, overall 5-year survival for oesophageal cancer remains <20%. Knowledge of epidemiology and risk factors for oesophageal cancer is essential for public health and clinical decisions about risk stratification, screening and prevention. The goal of this Review is to establish the current epidemiology of oesophageal cancer, with a particular focus on the Western world and the increasing incidence of EAC and Barrett oesophagus.

Incidence of Dysplasia in Obese vs Nonobese Patients With Nondysplastic Barrett Esophagus

Background: Obesity is a known independent risk factor for both Barrett esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, data about the effect of obesity on the risk of progression from nondysplastic Barrett esophagus to dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether obese patients with nondysplastic Barrett esophagus had a higher incidence of dysplasia development during routine surveillance than nonobese patients. Methods: In a retrospective review, 1,999 patients who had a first diagnosis of nondysplastic Barrett esophagus made by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at a single community hospital were tracked to their surveillance EGD 3 to 5 years later to evaluate for dysplasia (low grade, high grade, or adenocarcinoma). We compared the incidence of dysplasia development in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m²) with nonobese patients (BMI <30 kg/m²). Results: The sample population included 1,019 obese patients (51.0%) and 980 nonobese patients (49.0%) with nondysplastic Barrett esophagus. Their mean age was 56.5 ± 11.6 years, 1,228 (61.4%) were male, and 1,853 (92.7%) were Caucasian. At surveillance endoscopy performed at a mean follow-up of 3.7 years after their first EGD, 51 obese patients (incidence of 15.3 cases per 1,000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-19.9) and 15 nonobese patients (incidence of 4.6 cases per 1,000 person-years, 95% CI, 2.7-7.4) had developed dysplasia (P=0.0001). Conclusion: We found a significant increase in the incidence of dysplasia development in obese patients with nondysplastic Barrett esophagus at 3- to 5-year follow-up compared to nonobese patients. This finding suggests that more frequent surveillance in obese patients with nondysplastic Barrett esophagus may be warranted for early detection of dysplasia.

Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: A more sensitive biomarker of disease severity than BMI in adults with mitochondrial diseases

The study aimed to evaluate the body composition of patients with mitochondrial diseases (MD) and correlate it with disease severity. Overall, 89 patients (age ≥ 18 years) with MD were recruited, including 49 with chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) and 40 with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactate acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS). Body composition, including fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass index (FFMI), skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), were examined using multifrequency bioelectric impedance analysis. Clinical assessments, including muscle strength, usual gait speed, and disease severity determined by the Newcastle Mitochondrial Disease Adult Scale score (NMDAS), were performed. The comparisons between patients group and age- and gender-matched healthy controls, as well as the correlations between anthropometric measurements, body composition, and disease severity were analyzed. Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), FFMI, SMI, and ASMI were significantly lower in patients with MD than in healthy controls. Notably, low muscle mass was noted in 69.7% (62/89) of MD patients, with 22 patients also presenting with compromised physical performance as indicated by decreased gait speed, resulting in 24.7% satisfied the sarcopenia diagnostic criteria. Disease severity was more negatively correlated with ASMI than it was with height, weight, and BMI. Subgroup analysis showed that in the MELAS subgroup, disease severity was negatively correlated with height, weight, and ASMI; whereas in the CPEO subgroup, it was only negatively correlated with ASMI and SMI. Additionally, ASMI was positively associated with muscle strength. Altogether, compared with BMI, ASMI is a more sensitive biomarker predicting disease severity of MD, both in MELAS and CPEO patients.

Protective Propensity of Race or Environmental Features in the Development of Barrett's Esophagus in African Americans - A Single Center Pilot Study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Barrett's Esophagus (BE) is a well-recognized pre-malignant condition. Previous data indicate histologically confirmed BE frequency varies by ethnicity in the United States. However, clinical factor assessment to explain this has only occurred in a veteran population to date. The study aim was to determine which clinical factors may be associated with the ethnic variation seen in histologically confirmed BE among a general population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The University of Florida-Jacksonville endoscopy database was searched for all cases of endoscopic BE from September 2002 to October 2012. Histologic BE was diagnosed only if salmon colored, columnar-appearing esophageal mucosa was seen at endoscopy and biopsy revealed intestinal metaplasia with Alcian blue-stained goblet cells. Data collected included: age/BMI at diagnosis, ethnicity, sex, GERD history, atypical manifestations, endoscopic BE length, presence of esophageal stricture/ulcer/hiatal hernia, presence/absence of dysplasia and medication use (aspirin/NSAIDs/statin/PPI).

RESULTS

Salmon colored esophageal mucosa was observed in 1105 of 15,564 patients (7.1%) with BE histologically confirmed in 249 of 1105 patients (23%). Ethnic distribution of histologic BE patients: 83% non-Hispanic white (nHw), 13% African American (AA) and 4% other. No difference was seen between groups with regard to BMI, GERD symptom/complications, BE length, and cigarette, alcohol or medication use.

CONCLUSION

BE occurs primarily in nHw in north Florida. This occurs despite similarities in GERD history, cigarette/alcohol use, medications prescribed and BMI. Molecular level investigation is necessary to explain this observed disparity between nHw and AA.

Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: How Common Are They Really?

Since the early 1970s, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) has increased dramatically in most Western populations while the incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has decreased. As a result, EA has become the predominant subtype of esophageal cancer in North America and Europe and is an important contributor to overall cancer mortality. Barrett's esophagus (BE), a metaplastic columnar epithelium of the distal esophagus, is the known precursor lesion for EA. EA and BE occur more frequently in white men over 50 years old, as well as in people with frequent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, in smokers, and in people who are obese. Conversely, EA and BE are less common in persons using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and in person with Helicobacter pylori infection. The 5-year survival rate for patients with EA, although generally poor, has improved during the past decade, and long-term survival is increasingly possible for patients with early or locally advanced disease. This review combines a synthesis of published studies with an analysis of data from the United States National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to discuss the change in incidence of EA and summarize current knowledge of risk factors.

Development and Validation of a Model to Determine Risk of Progression of Barrett's Esophagus to Neoplasia

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A system is needed to determine the risk of patients with Barrett's esophagus for progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We developed and validated a model to determine of progression to HGD or EAC in patients with BE, based on demographic data and endoscopic and histologic findings at the time of index endoscopy.

METHODS

We performed a longitudinal study of patients with BE at 5 centers in United States and 1 center in Netherlands enrolled in the Barrett's Esophagus Study database from 1985 through 2014. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they had less than 1 year of follow-up, were diagnosed with HGD or EAC within the past year, were missing baseline histologic data, or had no intestinal metaplasia. Seventy percent of the patients were used to derive the model and 30% were used for the validation study. The primary outcome was development of HGD or EAC during the follow-up period (median, 5.9 years). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. We assigned a specific number of points to each BE risk factor, and point totals (scores) were used to create categories of low, intermediate, and high risk. We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals to determine associations between risk of progression and scores.

RESULTS

Of 4584 patients in the database, 2697 were included in our analysis (84.1% men; 87.6% Caucasian; mean age, 55.4 ± 20.1 years; mean body mass index, 27.9 ± 5.5 kg/m²; mean length of BE, 3.7 ± 3.2 cm). During the follow-up period, 154 patients (5.7%) developed HGD or EAC, with an annual rate of progression of 0.95%. Male sex, smoking, length of BE, and baseline-confirmed low-grade dysplasia were significantly associated with progression. Scores assigned identified patients with BE that progressed to HGD or EAC with a c-statistic of 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.80; P < .001). The calibration slope was 0.9966 (P = .99), determined from the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a scoring system (Progression in Barrett's Esophagus score) based on male sex, smoking, length of BE, and baseline low-grade dysplasia that identified patients with BE at low, intermediate, and high risk for HGD or EAC. This scoring system might be used in management of patients.

Abdominal diameter index is a stronger predictor of prevalent Barrett's esophagus than BMI or waist-to-hip ratio

Abdominal obesity is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Increased body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) have been associated with BE. Abdominal diameter index (ADI, sagittal abdominal diameter divided by thigh circumference) was previously shown to be a more accurate predictor of incident cardiovascular disease compared to other measurements. Our aim is to examine whether abdominal diameter index was a more accurate predictor of prevalent BE compared to other anthropometric measurements. We conducted a case-control study of patients presenting to our institution. Our study population was consecutive Caucasian men with a known history of BE, and we recruited control patients who had GERD without BE. Both groups completed a questionnaire about demographics, smoking, and medications and underwent a series of anthropometric body measurements using standardized measuring tools. BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, and abdominal diameter index were calculated. Thirty-one BE patients and 27 control patients were recruited. The BE cohort were older and had a higher rate of hiatal hernia. The mean abdominal diameter index for patients with BE was 0.65 ± 0.07 and without BE was 0.60 ± 0.07 (p = 0.01). The predictive value of abdominal diameter index was analyzed using a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve and was a more powerful predictor of BE than waist-to-hip ratio or BMI (AUROC = 0.70 vs. 0.60 vs. 0.52, respectively). Using a cut-point abdominal diameter index value of 0.60, abdominal diameter index had a sensitivity of 77.4% and a specificity of 63.0% for the presence of BE. When controlling for age, smoking status, and BMI, an abdominal diameter index ≥0.60 was a significant independent risk factor for BE (OR = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.29-25.4). In this pilot study, the abdominal diameter index appears to be a more powerful predictor of the presence of BE than BMI and waist-to-hip ratio and remained the only significant predictor of BE in multivariate analysis. We propose further validation of abdominal diameter index before inclusion in future prediction tools for BE.

Determination of risk for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor, Barrett's esophagus, have increased greatly over the past 40 years and continue to rise. This report summarizes the most recent data on the risk factors for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Other factors, highly correlated with increasing trends for obesity, are the dominant driver of the increase in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, interacting with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Abdominal obesity, independently of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, is associated with increased risk of Barrett's esophagus and this association is likely mediated by high levels of leptin and insulin. Use of aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins, and proton pump inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk of Barrett's esophagus as well as lower risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus. An increasing number of genetic loci have been associated with risk of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in identifying risk factors and reporting of more precise estimates of effect for the main risk factors will positively impact clinical risk stratification efforts for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Large pooling studies are underway to derive and validate reliable clinical risk models.

Risk Factors for Barrett's Oesophagus

BACKGROUND

Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is a premalignant condition associated with the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Globally, the incidence of OAC is rising. Furthermore, the prognosis regarding the morbidity and mortality of OAC is bleak, with an estimated 5-year survival of 10-15%. Hence, detection of the premalignant phase is paramount. Endoscopy and biopsy sampling is the mainstay of diagnosis. Patients may present with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) or be completely asymptomatic. Therefore, symptomatology alone is a poor indicator of this condition.

SUMMARY

This review highlights the current risk factors associated with the development of BO.

KEY MESSAGE

Primary risk factors for BO include male gender, increased age, a family history of the disease, long-standing GORD, smoking, obesity (specifically determined by the waist-to-hip ratio as opposed to BMI), and Caucasian race. Alcohol consumption and Helicobacter pylori are not associated with the condition.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

By ensuring an appropriate understanding of the risk factors, clinicians can discern at-risk patients for endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is among the most common conditions encountered by the gastroenterologist. In this document, the American College of Gastroenterology updates its guidance for the best practices in caring for these patients. These guidelines continue to endorse screening of high-risk patients for BE; however, routine screening is limited to men with reflux symptoms and multiple other risk factors. Acknowledging recent data on the low risk of malignant progression in patients with nondysplastic BE, endoscopic surveillance intervals are attenuated in this population; patients with nondysplastic BE should undergo endoscopic surveillance no more frequently than every 3-5 years. Neither routine use of biomarker panels nor advanced endoscopic imaging techniques (beyond high-definition endoscopy) is recommended at this time. Endoscopic ablative therapy is recommended for patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia, as well as T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma. Based on recent level 1 evidence, endoscopic ablative therapy is also recommended for patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, although endoscopic surveillance continues to be an acceptable alternative. Given the relatively common recurrence of BE after ablation, we suggest postablation endoscopic surveillance intervals. Although many of the recommendations provided are based on weak evidence or expert opinion, this document provides a pragmatic framework for the care of the patient with BE.

Metabolic syndrome and the risk of Barrett's oesophagus in white males

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the association between metabolic syndrome and Barrett's oesophagus (BO). Whether metabolic syndrome confers a risk greater than the sum of its components is unknown.

AIM

To investigate associations between metabolic syndrome, its components and BO in white males.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study among eligible symptomatic patients scheduled for elective oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and a sample of patients eligible for screening colonoscopy recruited at primary care clinics. Metabolic syndrome was defined as the presence of at least three of: high waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), hypertriglyceridaemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hypertension or diabetes. We used multivariate logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

There were 244 BO cases, 209 colonoscopy and 615 endoscopy controls. Comparing BO cases with all controls, metabolic syndrome was significantly associated with BO (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-2.40) and there was a dose effect with increasing number of metabolic syndrome components (Ptrend <0.001); when all five components were present, the OR was 2.61 (95% CI 1.14-5.99). We found that among the components, high WHR, hypertension and hypertriglyceridaemia were associated with increased risk of BO. When we compared cases with the control groups separately, metabolic syndrome was associated with BO for comparisons with endoscopy controls (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.10-2.55) but not colonoscopy controls (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.49-1.54). Associations with individual components also depended on the comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of Barrett's oesophagus in men undergoing endoscopy. Metabolic syndrome may confer additional risk of Barrett's oesophagus separate from obesity.

Role of Obesity in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Barrett's Esophagus

Central obesity is involved in the pathogenesis and progression of Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Involved are likely both mechanical and nonmechanical effects. Mechanical effects of increased abdominal fat cause disruption of the gastroesophageal reflux barrier leading to increased reflux events. Nonmechanical effects may be mediated by inflammation, via classically activated macrophages, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and adipokines such as Leptin, all of which likely potentiate reflux-mediated inflammation. Insulin resistance, associated with central obesity, is also associated with both Barrett's pathogenesis and progression to adenocarcinoma. Molecular pathways activated in obesity, inflammation and insulin resistance overlap with those involved in Barrett's pathogenesis and progression.

The relationship between length of Barrett's oesophagus mucosa and body mass index

BACKGROUND

Length of Barrett's oesophagus (BE) is a risk factor for oesophageal cancer. The underlying mechanisms that determine BE length are nor fully known.

AIM

To determine if there is a correlation between obesity and length of BE.

METHODS

Using a population-based study, 381 patients diagnosed with Barrett's oesophagus between 1999 and 2013 were included. Body mass index (BMI) at the time of BE diagnosis was calculated. Upper endoscopy reports were reviewed to obtain the length of BE. Spearman's correlation coefficient was performed to assess the strength of the relationship between Barrett's length and BMI. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to further examine the association between BMI and length of BE.

RESULTS

The adjusted odds ratio for each five-point increase in BMI was 1.5 (95% CI 1.24-1.81, P < 0.001). The mean BMI was significantly higher in patients with long segment BE as compared to patients with short segment BE (32.7 vs. 30.3, P = 0.001). There was also a positive trend in long segment BE as patients entered into higher BMI categories (Z = 4.25, P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between BMI and length of BE (r = 0.25, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated a correlation between BMI and the length of Barrett's oesophagus mucosa. Thus, increased BMI is associated with longer segment of Barrett's oesophagus.

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease symptoms and demographic factors as a pre-screening tool for Barrett's esophagus

Background

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) occurs as consequence of reflux and is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The current “gold-standard” for diagnosing BE is endoscopy which remains prohibitively expensive and impractical as a population screening tool. We aimed to develop a pre-screening tool to aid decision making for diagnostic referrals.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A prospective (training) cohort of 1603 patients attending for endoscopy was used for identification of risk factors to develop a risk prediction model. Factors associated with BE in the univariate analysis were selected to develop prediction models that were validated in an independent, external cohort of 477 non-BE patients referred for endoscopy with symptoms of reflux or dyspepsia. Two prediction models were developed separately for columnar lined epithelium (CLE) of any length and using a stricter definition of intestinal metaplasia (IM) with segments ≥2 cm with areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of 0.72 (95%CI: 0.67–0.77) and 0.81 (95%CI: 0.76–0.86), respectively. The two prediction models included demographics (age, sex), symptoms (heartburn, acid reflux, chest pain, abdominal pain) and medication for “stomach” symptoms. These two models were validated in the independent cohort with AUCs of 0.61 (95%CI: 0.54–0.68) and 0.64 (95%CI: 0.52–0.77) for CLE and IM≥2 cm, respectively.

Conclusions

We have identified and validated two prediction models for CLE and IM≥2 cm. Both models have fair prediction accuracies and can select out around 20% of individuals unlikely to benefit from investigation for Barrett’s esophagus. Such prediction models have the potential to generate useful cost-savings for BE screening among the symptomatic population.

Total body fat and the risk of Barrett's oesophagus - a bioelectrical impedance study

BACKGROUND

Body mass index is associated with the risk of Barrett's oesophagus (BO). It is uncertain whether this is related to total body fat or other factors that correlate with body mass index. We aimed to quantify the association between total body fat (measured by bioelectrical impedance) and risk of BO and examine if this association was modified by gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) and abdominal obesity.

METHODS

In 2007-2009, we surveyed 235 cases (69% Males, Mean age 62.1 years) and 244 age and sex matched population controls from a population based case-control study of BO. We conducted structured interviews, standard anthropometry and bioimpedance analysis of total body fat. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significantly increased risk of BO among those in the highest tertile of total body fat weight (OR 2.01; 95%CI 1.26-3.21) and total body fat percentage (OR 1.86; 95%CI 1.10-3.15). These risks were largely attenuated after adjustment for GOR and waist circumference. There was a significantly increased risk of BO among those in the highest tertile of waist circumference (OR 2.21; 95%CI 1.39-3.51) and this was minimally attenuated after adjustment for total body fat and moderately attenuated after adjustment for GOR.

CONCLUSIONS

Total body fat is associated with an increased risk of BO but this appears to be mediated via both abdominal obesity and GOR. These findings provide evidence that abdominal obesity is more important than total body fat in the development of BO.