18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography

Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Use of Nuclear medicine diagnostic and treatment modalities in cancer

ABSTRACT

PET/CT and radioisotope therapy are diagnostic and therapeutic arms of Nuclear Medicine, respectively. With the emergence of better technology, PET/CT has become an accessible modality. Diagnostic tracers exploring disease-specific targets has led the clinicians to look beyond FDG PET. Moreover, with the emergence of theranostic pairs of radiopharmaceuticals, radioisotope therapy is gradually making it's way into treatment algorithm of common cancers in India. We therefore would like to discuss in detail the updates in PET/CT imaging and radionuclide therapy and generate a consensus-driven evidence based document which would guide the practitioners of Oncology.

Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: Recent studies suggest that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated superiority over 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of various cancer types, especially in gastric cancer (GC). By comprehensively reviewing and analysing the differences between 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG in GC, some evidence is provided to foster the broader clinical application of FAPI PET imaging. Methods: In this review, studies published up to July 3, 2023, that employed radionuclide labelled FAPI as a diagnostic radiotracer for PET in GC were analysed. These studies were sourced from both the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Our statistical analysis involved a bivariate meta-analysis of the diagnostic data and a meta-analysis of the quantitative metrics. These were performed using R language. Results: The meta-analysis included 14 studies, with 527 patients, of which 358 were diagnosed with GC. Overall, 68Ga-FAPI showed higher pooled sensitivity (0.84 [95% CI 0.67-0.94] vs. 0.46 [95% CI 0.32-0.60]), specificity (0.91 [95% CI 0.76-0.98] vs. 0.88 [95% CI 0.74-0.96]) and area under the curve (AUC) (0.92 [95% CI 0.77-0.98] vs. 0.52 [95% CI 0.38-0.86]) than 18F-FDG. The evidence showed superior pooled sensitivities of 68Ga-FAPI PET over 18F-FDG for primary tumours, local recurrence, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and peritoneal metastases. Furthermore, 68Ga-FAPI PET provided higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumour-to-background ratios (TBR). For bone metastases, while 68Ga-FAPI PET demonstrated slightly lower patient-based pooled sensitivity (0.93 vs. 1.00), it significantly outperformed 18F-FDG in the lesion-based analysis (0.95 vs. 0.65). However, SUVmax (mean difference [MD] 1.79 [95% CI -3.87-7.45]) and TBR (MD 5.01 [95% CI -0.78-10.80]) of bone metastases showed no significant difference between 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Conclusion: Compared with 18F-FDG, 68Ga-FAPI PET imaging showed improved diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of GC. It can be effectively applied to the early diagnosis, initial staging, and detection of recurrence/metastases of GC. 68Ga-FAPI may have the potential of replacing 18F-FDG in GC in future applications.

Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI and [18F]FDG uptake in patients with gastric signet-ring-cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the role of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET imaging in the detection of primary and metastatic gastric signet-ring-cell carcinoma (GSRCC) and compared with [¹⁸F]FDG PET.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter analysis included 34 patients with histologically confirmed GSRCCs from four medical centers. The maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and diagnostic accuracy were compared between the two modalities. [¹⁸F]FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI uptakes were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. McNemar's test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy between the two techniques.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 27 paired PET/CT and 7 paired PET/MRI scans for 34 GSRCC patients (16 men and 18 women) who had a median age of 51 years (range: 25-85 years). [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET showed higher SUV_max and TBR values than did [¹⁸F]FDG PET in the primary tumors (SUV_max: 5.2 vs. 2.2, p = 0.001; TBR: 7.6 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001), involved lymph nodes (SUV_max: 6.8 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001; TBR: 5.8 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001), and bone and visceral metastases (SUV_max: 6.5 vs. 2.4, p < 0.001; TBR: 6.3 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001). In diagnostic performance, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET exhibited higher sensitivity than [¹⁸F]FDG PET for detecting primary tumors (73% [16/22] vs. 18% [4/22], p < 0.001), local recurrences (100% [7/7] vs. 29% [2/7], p = 0.071), lymph node metastases (77% [59/77] vs. 23% [18/77], p < 0.001), and distant metastases (93% [207/222] vs. 39% [86/222], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results from this multicenter retrospective analysis justify the clinical use of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI tracers for GSRCC diagnosis and staging.

KEY POINTS

• [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT is a promising imaging modality for the detection of primary and metastatic disease and has implications for TNM staging in GSRCC. • In this multicenter study of 34 patients with GSRCC, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET exhibited greater radiotracer uptake, tumor-to-background ratios, and diagnostic accuracy than [¹⁸F]FDG PET for detecting primary/recurrent tumors and metastatic lesions.

Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

Clinical outcomes of gastroduodenal neuroendocrine tumors according to their WHO grade: A single-institutional retrospective analysis

The management of gastroduodenal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) has been controversial between radical surgical resection and local excision including endoscopic resection. A gastroduodenal NET grade (G), measured by their mitotic rate and Ki67 proliferation index, is important to predict prognosis. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of gastroduodenal NET according to grades in order to identify poor prognostic factors of gastroduodenal NETs. Fifty-four gastroduodenal NETs diagnosed between December 2008 and December 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcomes of gastroduodenal NETs, according to tumor grades and factors associated with NET G2-3, were analyzed. A total of 52 gastroduodenal NET patients was enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 56.2 ± 40.1 months. The mean size of gastric and duodenal NET was 7.9 ± 11.0 mm and 9.8 ± 7.6 mm, respectively. During the study period, 72.7% (16/22) of gastric NETs and 83.3% (25/30) of duodenal NETS were G1. All G1 gastroduodenal NETs showed no lymph node or distant metastasis during the study periods. All G3 gastroduodenal NETs showed metastasis (one lymph node metastasis and 3 hepatic metastases). Among metastatic NETs, the smallest tumor size was a 13 mm gastric G3 NET. Factors associated with G2-3 NETs were larger tumor size, mucosal ulceration, proper muscle or deeper invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. A small-sized gastroduodenal NET confined to submucosa without surface ulceration may be suitable for endoscopic resection. After local resection of a gastroduodenal NET (G1) without lymphovascular and muscle proper invasion, follow-up examination without radical surgical resection can be recommended. G3 NETs may be treated by radical surgical resection, regardless of tumor size.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology: III. Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate the characterization of radioactivity from deep or dense structures, and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The third report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Abstract

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, assessment of response to therapy, restaging and longitudinal surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, and the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications. In the third of these review articles, key tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided to outline the role that PET-CT plays in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The focus is on the use of ¹⁸F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), rather than on research radiopharmaceuticals under development. Many different types of gastrointestinal tumors exist, both pediatric and adult. A discussion of the role of FDG PET-CT for all of these is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this article focuses on the most common adult gastrointestinal malignancies that may be encountered in clinical practice. The information provided here will provide information outlining the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies for healthcare professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides interpretive guidance related to PET-CT for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.

Current and future imaging modalities in gastric cancer

Gastric adenocarcinoma treatment can include endoscopic mucosal resection, surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and palliative measures depending on staging. Both invasive and noninvasive staging techniques have been used to dictate the best treatment pathway. Here, we review the current imaging modalities used in gastric cancer as well as novel techniques to accurately stage and screen these patients.

Evaluation of dual time-point fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography imaging in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of dual time-point fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging in detecting primary and metastatic lesions in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between May 2019 and January 2020, 52 patients with gastric carcinoma were prospectively involved in our study. And dual time-point FDG PET/CT imaging performed to the patients. Of detected primary and metastatic lesions, the ones that are better visualized or only appear in delayed imaging were visually identified. Also, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary and metastatic lesions and the intact liver tissue were measured in early and delayed imaging. Acquired SUVmax values and SUVmax ratios were compared statistically.

RESULTS

In delayed images, lesions were better visualized in 32 patients (61.5%) and extra lesions were detected in 4 patients (7.7%). SUVmax of primary tumor, SUVmax of liver metastases, SUVmax of lymph node metastases, primary tumor SUVmax/liver SUVmax ratio and lymph node metastasis SUVmax/liver SUVmax ratio were significantly higher in delayed images (P < 0.001, P = 0.022, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). However, SUVmax of liver parenchyma was significantly lower in delayed images (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a visually and statistically significant increase in the number and detectability of lesions seen in delayed images and dual time-point FDG PET/CT imaging seems useful in detecting primary and metastatic lesions in gastric cancer.

Improving MR sequence of 18F-FDG PET/MR for diagnosing and staging gastric Cancer: a comparison study to 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

Evaluate the feasibility of fluorine-18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with gastric cancer by optimizing the scan protocol and to compare the image quality to ¹⁸F FDG PET and computed tomography (CT).

Methods

The PET/CT and PET/MR imaging were sequentially performed in 30 patients with gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscope using a single-injection-with-dual-imaging protocol. After intravenous injection of ¹⁸F-FDG (mean, 249 MBq), PET/CT imaging including low-dose CT was performed (mean uptake time, 47 ± 6 min), and PET/MR imaging including a T1-weighted Dixon sequence for attenuation correction and two different T2-weighted sequences was subsequently acquired (88 ± 15 min after ¹⁸F-FDG injection). Four series of images (CT from PET/CT, T1W, T2W Half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo [T2W-HASTE] and T2W-BLADE from PET/MR) were visually evaluated using a 3–4 points scale for: (1) image artifacts, (2) lesion conspicuity and (3) image fusion quality. The characteristics of the primary lesions were assessed and compared between the PET/CT and PET/MR acquisitions.

Results

The image quality and lesion conspicuity of the T2W-HASTE images were significantly improved compared to that of the T2W-BLADE images. A significantly higher number of artifacts were seen in the T2W-HASTE images compared with the T1W and CT images (p < 0. 05). No differences in the accuracy of image fusion between PET/MR and PET/CT (p > 0. 05); however, significant difference was seen in the lesion conspicuity measurements (p < 0.05) with T2W-HASTE being superior. For information about the primary lesion characteristics, the T2W-HASTE images provided the most successful identifications compared with those of the T1W and PET/CT (13vs7vs5) images.

Conclusions

PET/MR with the T2W-HASTE was better at revealing the details of local stomach lesions compared with PET/CT imaging. Combining the PET/MR with the T2W-HASTE technique is a promising imaging method for diagnosing and staging gastric cancer.

Metabolic Characteristics and Diagnostic Contribution of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Gastric Carcinomas

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose (FDG) uptake patterns in primary tumors and metastatic lesions, and also to assess the diagnostic contribution of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the initial staging of gastric cancer (GC).

Methods:

The total number of 341 patients with GC were included in this study. All ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imagings were performed for initial staging. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) of primary tumor, obtained from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging was compared between subtypes of GC.

Results:

Mean SUV_max of 339 patients’ primary tumor was 12.9±8.6. The highest mean SUV_max was detected in patients with medullary subtype GC (17.8±9.9) while the lowest mean SUV_max (9.7±7.6) was seen in signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). The primary mean SUV_max was found statistically higher in tubular adenocarcinoma (TAC) group than SRCC group (p<0.001). Higher SUV_max values were found statistically significantly correlated with advanced age (aged ≥60) and increased tumor size (>3 cm) in patients with TAC (p=0.03). Primary tumor SUV_max was found statistically higher in regional lymph node (RLN) positive patients than in RLN negative patients in TAC and SRCC groups (p<0.001 and p=0.012, respectivelly). Also, in patients with SRCC, SUV_max was significantly higher in the distant metastatic group than in the group without metastasis (p=0.025).

Conclusion:

Increased primary tumor SUV_max was associated with some of clinical parameters such as age and RLN metastasis in patients with TAC. However, there was no relationship between distant metastatic state and primary tumor ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in TAC. However, high SUV_max of primary tumor in SRCC was associated with regional and distant metastasis, and primary tumor ¹⁸F-FDG uptake may be a prognostic value for this subgroup.

The Utility of PET/Computed Tomography for Radiation Oncology Planning, Surveillance, and Prognosis Prediction of Gastrointestinal Tumors

At present, the strongest evidence for the use of PET/computed tomography (CT) in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies is to rule out distant metastatic disease at diagnosis, radiation treatment planning for anal malignancies, and disease recurrence monitoring in colorectal and anal malignancies. Use of PET/CT for GI malignancies continues to evolve over time, with new studies evaluating prognostic abilities of PET/CT and with increasing sensitivity and spatial resolution of more modern PET/CT scanners. The authors encourage future applications and prospective evaluation of the use of PET/CT in the staging, prognostication, and recurrence prediction for GI malignancies.

111In-labeled anti-cadherin17 antibody D2101 has potential as a noninvasive imaging probe for diagnosing gastric cancer and lymph-node metastasis

OBJECTIVE

Cadherin-17 (CDH17) is a transmembrane protein that mediates cell-cell adhesion and is frequently expressed in adenocarcinomas, including gastric cancer. CDH17 may be an effective diagnostic marker for the staging of gastric cancer. Here, we developed an ¹¹¹In-labeled anti-CDH17 monoclonal antibody (Mab) as an imaging tracer and performed biodistribution and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) imaging studies using mice with CDH17-positive gastric cancer xenografts. CDH17 expression in gastric cancer specimens was also analyzed.

METHODS

The cross-reactivity and affinity of our anti-CDH17 Mab D2101 was evaluated by surface plasmon resonance analysis and cell enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Biodistribution and SPECT/CT studies of ¹¹¹In-labeled D2101 (¹¹¹In-D2101) were performed. CDH17 expression in gastric cancer specimens was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Surface plasmon resonance analysis revealed that D2101 specifically recognizes human CDH17, but not murine CDH17. The affinity of D2101 slightly decreased as a result of the radiolabeling procedures. The biodistribution study revealed high uptake of ¹¹¹In-D2101 in tumors (maximum, 39.2 ± 9.5% ID/g at 96 h postinjection), but low uptake in normal organs, including the stomach. Temporal SPECT/CT imaging with ¹¹¹In-D2101 visualized tumors with a high degree of tumor-to-nontumor contrast. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that, compared with HER2, which is a potential marker of N-stage, CDH17 had a higher frequency of positivity in specimens of primary and metastatic gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our ¹¹¹In-anti-CDH17 Mab D2101 depicted CDH17-positive gastric cancer xenografts in vivo and has the potential to be an imaging probe for the diagnosis of primary lesions and lymph-node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Targeting HER2-positive gastric cancer with a novel 18F-labeled ZHER2:342 probe

To realize the diagnosis of HER2-positive gastric cancer via PET imaging, herein, a new kind of ¹⁸F-labeled HER2 affibody probe was created; the bifunctional maleimide derivative 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA-MAL) was first coupled to a polypeptide, and the resulting compound was subsequently labeled with the ¹⁸FAl complex. The binding characteristics of the probe were assessed using both in vitro studies and in vivo microPET imaging and biodistribution experiments. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to confirm the expression level of HER2 in the studied cell lines and tumors. The probe was successfully produced with the radiochemical purity of more than 95%. The NCI N87 cell-associated radioactivity was 19.31 ± 1.01% AD, and it decreased to 0.83 ± 0.04% AD per 10⁶ cells after blocking HER2 as early as 15 minutes post-incubation (p < 0.05). A competition binding assay between radiolabeled and non-radioactive affibody molecules with NCI N87 indicated that the IC₅₀ was 8.10 nM. The microPET imaging and biodistribution of human gastric cancer xenografts demonstrated that the probe could specifically accumulate in tumors at early time points. Protein detection confirmed a strong HER2 expression in NCIN87 and a weak HER2 expression in SGC7901. In conclusion, ¹⁸FAl-NOTA-MAL-Cys-GGGRDN(M⁰)-Z_HER2:342 was successfully prepared via a one-step method. The favorable preclinical data showed specific and effective tumor targeting capacity of the proposed probe; this revealed that the probe proposed herein might have potential application in gastric cancer imaging.

Tumor targeting of the novel ¹⁸F-labeled Z_HER2:342 probe in HER2-positive gastric cancer xenograft models.

Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT Semiquantitative Analysis in the Management of Sarcoidosis

Background:

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder of unknown origin characterized by nonspecific clinical symptomatology. 18F-FDG PET/CT can visualize activated inflammatory cells of sarcoidosis and simultaneously provide whole-body images. </P><P> Objective: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT and its semiquantitative parameters for the assessment of treatment efficacy in patients with sarcoidosis.

Methods:

Thirty-one consecutive patients who performed 18F-FDG PET/CT for sarcoidosis assessment were selected. All subjects performed 18F-FDG PET/CT before any treatment (PET1) and after 6-12 months (PET2). SUVmax and SUVmean on PET1 and PET2 were collected. SUVs values were employed to evaluate the ratios with the liver (R-LIVERmax, R-LIVERmean) and the blood (R-BLOODmax, R-BLOODmean). The difference between the PET1 and PET2 values was evaluated (&#916;SUVmax, &#916;SUVmean, &#916;R-LIVERmax, &#916;R-LIVERmean, &#916;R-BLOODmax, &#916;R-BLOODmean). Patients were classified as Responders (R), Partial-Responders (PR) and Non- Responders (NR).

Results:

Seventeen patients (54.8%) had a complete metabolic response (R), 4 (12.9%) were PR while 10 (32.3%) had no Metabolic Response (NR). The chi-square test showed that response groups were related neither to the stage of disease (p=0.59) nor to therapy performed (p<0.079). The comparison between each &#916; semiquantitative parameter showed a statistically significant decrease from PET1 to PET2 (0.0001 < p < 0.002). The comparison between &#916; mean values in relation to response groups showed to be statistically significant (0.001 < p < 0.005). Conversely, they did not show statistical significance in relation to the clinical stage groups and to the kind of therapy performed (p>0.05). Pearson’s coefficient demonstrated a reverse correlation between a number of sites still involved in disease after therapy and each &#916; semiquantitative parameters (p&#8804;0.0001).

Conclusion:

18F-FDG PET/CT should be considered a useful technique for the evaluation of sarcoidosis and semiquantitative parameters. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on clinical outcomes.

Anthracosilicosis mimicking extensive nodal metastasis from early gastric cancer: A case report

•

Anthracosilicosis can mimic extensive node metastasis from gastric cancer.

•

The PET-CT scan is not specific enough to detect metastatic lymph nodes precisely.

•

Surgical exploration should be considered when the result of imaging studies is doubtful.

Introduction

Lymph node metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in gastric cancer and precise assessment of nodal status facilitates optimal therapeutic decisions. Many diagnostic modalities including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT), and sometimes, positron emission tomography (PET) have been utilized to improve diagnostic accuracy in detecting metastatic lymph nodes; however, their accuracy remains unsatisfactory.

Presentation of case

We report a case of a 73-year old male patient who was erroneously diagnosed with stage IV gastric cancer due to the distant nodal metastasis from early gastric cancer lesion during the initial staging process. However, surgical exploration revealed an anthracosilicosis-associated lymphadenopathy that mimicked extensive distant nodal metastasis in the preoperative CT and PET-CT scans. The patient was finally diagnosed with stage I gastric cancer confined to the mucosa without nodal metastasis.

Discussion

We report a rare case of gastric cancer concurrent extensive nodal involvement of anthracosilicosis mimicking metastatic nodal disease in the imaging studies. This case implies that PET-CT scan for clinical staging is not specific enough to clearly delineate malignant lesions, causing a diagnostic dilemma.

Conclusion

When the characteristics of the primary tumor is poorly correlated to the findings of imaging studies, surgical exploration can be a viable option for a definitive diagnosis before making a hasty decision based only upon the diagnostic imaging results.

Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Routinely Performed in the Clinical Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional imaging techniques in the clinical management of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

METHODS

A prospective study between January 2010 and December 2011 in patients with suspected LAGC was conducted in our hospital. F-FDG PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), endoscopic ultrasound, and laparoscopy were performed in all cases. Standard whole-body F-FDG PET/CT images were obtained centered on the stomach at 1 and 2 hours after injection of 4.0 MBq/kg of F-FDG. Findings were confirmed by histopathology or by imaging follow-up in nonoperable patients.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive patients with confirmed LAGC (20 women, 30 men) with a mean ± SD age of 65.7 ± 12.1 years were included. Using Lauren classification, 24 patients were intestinal subtype, and 26 were diffuse subtype. Thirty-five patients with locoregional lymph node involvement and 22 with distant metastases were confirmed as peritoneal metastases (n = 15), retroperitoneal (n = 2) or mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 1), and liver (n = 3) or bone metastases (n = 1). Patients with signet ring carcinoma showed significantly less F-FDG uptake (P = 0.001). SUVmax correlated with tumor grading (P < 0.05). Standard and delayed F-FDG PET/CT and CECT images identified LAGC in 24, 27, and 28 of 30 patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for F-FDG PET/CT and CECT to detect metastases were 68% and 100% and 64% and 93%, respectively. Contrast-enhanced CT and F-FDG PET/CT diagnosed only 6 of the 15 patients with confirmed peritoneal metastases. The impact in therapeutic management of F-FDG PET/CT and CECT was 24% and 22%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the LGAC showed a significant correlation between SUVmax and overall survival using an SUVmax threshold of less than 3.96 (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

F-FDG PET/CT should be recommended for staging of LAGC; however, F-FDG PET/CT and CECT cannot replace laparoscopy to rule out peritoneal metastases. Delayed F-FDG PET/CT images show an increase of F-FDG uptake in most cases, improving LAGC detection. The grade of F-FDG uptake represents a significant prognostic tool in this series.

Investigation of Association Between Borderline Pancreatic Head Cancer and Glucose Uptake by Using Positron-Emission Tomographic Studies

BACKGROUND In the background of the well-known importance of positron-emission tomographic studies (PET) in the prediction of pancreatic oncologic problems, we designed and performed this investigation to study the link between borderline pancreatic head cancer and glucose uptake by using PET. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively investigated patients during the period of almost 4 years (May 2013 to December 2016). Patients underwent potentially curative resection for borderline exocrine pancreatic head adenocarcinoma without undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. We divided our PET protocol into 2 sets of methods as per renal calyces: 1) U-RC type in which renal calyx (RC) has relatively higher value than that of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake and 2) S-RC type in which renal calyx has similar value than that of 18F-FDG uptake. RESULTS A total of 67 patients were enrolled after reclassification on the basis of majority-agreement. Among these patients, U-RC type was found in 22 patients (32.8%) while S-RC type was found in 45 patients (67.2%). Significant statistical differences were observed for each of the 2 types of pancreatic head cancer (U-RC type and S-RC type) in terms of adjusted cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), size of the tumor, tumor volume (TV2.8), maximum standard uptake value (SUV↑), and lesion glycolysis (LG). A significantly longer disease-free survival time was shown by U-RC type (n=18) pancreatic cancer in comparison to S-RC type (n=42) (25.3 vs. 11.2 months). Additionally, U-RC type (n=4) had higher disease-free survival than did aS-RC type (n=3) (29.4 vs. 12.5 months). CONCLUSIONS Our PET protocol appears to be an indicator for estimation of recurrence of pancreatic head cancer and is as an indispensable asset to oncologists.

Peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer following curative resection can be predicted by postoperative but not preoperative biomarkers: a single-institution study of 320 cases

To determine the risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer patients after curative resection, we included 320 patients with stage I-III primary gastric cancer between January 2008 and June 2012. Data on each patient's surgical and pathological information, preoperative and postoperative tumor markers were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The risk factors for peritoneal recurrence were investigated by univariate and multivariate analysis. In patients with peritoneal recurrence, advanced T or N stage, low differentiation, vascular/lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, and elevated postoperative CEA/CA19-9 were more common than in patients without peritoneal recurrence. Patients with peritoneal recurrence showed a worse overall survival (OS) compared to those without peritoneal recurrence. In addition, patients with peritoneal recurrence within the first year had a worse OS compared to those with recurrence after 1 year. The univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that elevated number of metastatic lymph nodes and elevated postoperative CEA and CA19-9 were three independent risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer patients. For patients with N3 stage and high postoperative CEA and CA19-9, we found an initial steep slope within approximately 1 year and a subsequent gentle slope in the risk curve. Combined receiver operating characteristic curve analysis using the three independent risk factors for peritoneal recurrence yielded an area under the curve value of 0.73 with 73.7% sensitivity and 64.2% specificity. Therefore, the risk factors may be associated with peritoneal recurrence after curative resection in selected gastric cancer patients.

Comparison of DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing preoperative N-staging in gastric cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis

The diagnostic values of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) for N-staging of gastric cancer (GC) were identified and compared. After a systematic search to identify relevant articles, meta-analysis was used to summarize the sensitivities, specificities, and areas under curves (AUCs) for DWI and PET/CT. To better understand the diagnostic utility of DWI and PET/CT for N-staging, the performance of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) was used as a reference. Fifteen studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with 95% confidence intervals of DWI were 0.79 (0.73–0.85), 0.69 (0.61–0.77), and 0.81 (0.77–0.84), respectively. For PET/CT, the corresponding values were 0.52 (0.39–0.64), 0.88 (0.61–0.97), and 0.66 (0.62–0.70), respectively. Comparison of the two techniques revealed DWI had higher sensitivity and AUC, but no difference in specificity. DWI exhibited higher sensitivity but lower specificity than MDCT, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had lower sensitivity and equivalent specificity. Overall, DWI performed better than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative N-staging in GC. When the efficacy of MDCT was taken as a reference, DWI represented a complementary imaging technique, while ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had limited utility for preoperative N-staging.

Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitors Therapies with Mainly Anti-Angiogenic Activity in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Value of PET/CT in Response Evaluation

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most frequent renal tumor and the majority of patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Tumor angiogenesis plays a crucial role in the development and progression of RCC together with hypoxia and glucose metabolism. These three pathways are strictly connected to the cell growth and proliferation, like a loop that is self-feeding. Over the last few years, the ever-deeper knowledge of its contribution in metastatic RCC led to the discovery of numerous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting pro-angiogenic receptors at different levels such as sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, axitinib, tivozanib, and dovitinib. As anti-angiogenic agents, TKIs interfere the loop, being able to inhibit tumor proliferation. TKIs are now available treatments for advanced RCC, which demonstrated to improve overall survival and/or progression free survival. Their effects can be detectable early on Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) by change in ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake, the main radiotracer used to date, as a strong indicator of biological response. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated an ability to predict and monitor disease progression, allowing an early and reliable identification of responders, and could be used for image-guided optimization and "personalization" of anti-angiogenic regimens. New radiotracers for biometabolic imaging are currently under investigation, which exploit the other pathways involved in the cancer process, including cellular proliferation, aerobic metabolism, cell membrane synthesis, hypoxia and amino acid transport, as well as the angiogenic process, but they require further studies.

Comparison between CT Net enhancement and PET/CT SUV for N staging of gastric cancer: A case series

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic approach of gastric cancer strictly depends on TNM staging mainly provided by CT and PET/CT. However, the lymph node size criterion as detected by MDCT causes a poor differential diagnosis between reactive and metastatic enlarged lymph nodes with low specificity values. Our study aims to compare 320-row CT Net enhancement and fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) SUV for N staging of gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

45 patients with histologically proven gastric cancer underwent CT and F-FDG PET/CT. Two radiologists in consensus evaluated all images and calculated the CT Net enhancement and F-FDG PET/CT SUV for N staging, having the histological findings as the reference standard. CT and F-FDG PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were evaluated and compared by using the Mc Nemar test.

RESULTS

The histological examination revealed nodal metastases in 29/45 cases (64%). CT Net enhancement obtained sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 90%, 81%, 87%, 90% and 81%, respectively. F-FDG PET/CT SUV obtained sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 66%, 88%, 73%, 90% and 58%, respectively. No statistically significant difference between the two imaging modalities was found (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

CT Net enhancement represents an accurate tool for N staging of gastric cancer and could be considered as the CT corresponding quantitative parameter of F-FDG PET/CT SUV. It could be applied in the clinical practice for differentiating reactive lymph nodes from metastatic ones improving accuracy and specificity of CT.

PET/Computed Tomography and Precision Medicine: Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is a disease with low survival rates and high morbidity, requiring accurate and prompt diagnosis and treatment. Although limited in the evaluation of the primary tumor as such, the metabolic information of primary tumors in an ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT study can assist in surgical and treatment planning and differentiating gastric cancers. It detects nodal disease with good specificity and positive predictive value, thus enabling appropriate therapy for individual patients. It provides valuable information about distant metastases, altering therapy decisions. It has reasonably good performance in detecting recurrent disease and in the follow-up of patients.

Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Many patients have inoperable disease at diagnosis or have recurrent disease after resection with curative intent. Gastric cancer is separated anatomically into true gastric adenocarcinomas and gastro-oesophageal-junction adenocarcinomas, and histologically into diffuse and intestinal types. Gastric cancer should be treated by teams of experts from different disciplines. Surgery is the only curative treatment. For locally advanced disease, adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy is usually implemented in combination with surgery. In metastatic disease, outcomes are poor, with median survival being around 1 year. Targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab, an antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2), and the VEGFR-2 antibody ramucirumab, have been introduced. In this Seminar, we present an update of the causes, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of gastric cancer.

18F-FDG uptake in the stomach on screening PET/CT: value for predicting Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic atrophic gastritis

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the value of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake on screening PET/CT images for the prediction of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and chronic atrophic gastritis.

Methods

Among subjects who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for cancer screening from April 2005 to November 2015, PET/CT images were analyzed in 88 subjects who had gastrointestinal fiberscopy within 6 months. The volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed in the fornix, corpus and antrum of the stomach to determine maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and mean SUV (SUVmean). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of SUV indicators in predicting H. pylori infection and chronic atrophic gastritis.

Results

SUV indicators of the stomach were significantly higher in subjects with H. pylori infection than those without (from P < 0.001 to P < 0.05). ROC analysis revealed that SUVmean had the highest performance in predicting H. pylori infection (AUC 0.807) and chronic atrophic gastritis (AUC 0.784). SUVmean exhibited the sensitivity of 86.5 % and the specificity of 70.6 % in predicting H. pylori infection, and the sensitivity of 75.0 % and 78.6 % in predicting chronic atrophic gastritis.

Conclusion

Assessment of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the stomach reflecting active inflammation is useful in predicting patients with H. pylori infection and subsequent chronic atrophic gastritis which is closely associated with the risk of gastric neoplasms.

Correlation between PET-CT maximum standardized uptake value and HER2 expression in gastric carcinoma

AIM: To investigate the relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in gastric carcinoma.

METHODS: Sixty-one patients who underwent PET-CT at our hospital and had pathologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma were included, and SUVmax was measured. HER2 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between SUVmax and HER2 expression was analyzed statistically.

RESULTS: Of all the patients, 28 were positive for HER2, with a positive rate of 49.12%. The SUVmax for the HER2 positive group was 4.6448 ± 3.18597, which was significantly higher than that for the HER2 negative group (P = 0.000). There was a moderate positive correlation between SUVmax and HER2, and the correlation coefficient was 0.581. According to the ROC analysis, the area under the curve of SUVmax was 0.83. Taking 5.800 as the threshold of SUVmax, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 82.1% and 79.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: There is a moderate correlation between SUVmax and HER2 in gastric adenocarcinoma, and SUVmax can help assess the biological characteristics of gastric cancer.

Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT

PURPOSE

To evaluate the added clinical value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT (CECT) alone for staging of advanced gastric cancer

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 106 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent pretreatment CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Two experienced reviewers assessed the diagnostic performance of both CECT alone and the combination of CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the primary tumor, regional lymph node metastasis (N) and distant metastasis (M), rating their diagnostic confidence with a 5-point scoring system for each location. The two methods were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for histopathologic findings, imaging, and clinical follow-up as the reference standards.

RESULTS

Among the 106 patients, 96 primary tumors (90.6%) were detected by CECT, while 101 (95.3%) were clearly identified by (18)F-FDG PET/CT (p=0.074). Patient-based areas under the ROC curves for CECT alone versus the combination of CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of N stage, peritoneal dissemination, liver metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, metastasis at other sites and overall M stage were 0.787 vs. 0.858 (p=0.13), 0.866 vs. 0.878 (p=0.31), 0.998 vs. 1.0 (p=0.36), 0.744 vs. 0.865 (p=0.049), 0.786 vs. 0.998 (p=0.034), 0.944 vs. 0.984 (p=0.34), and 0.889 vs. 0.912 (p=0.21), respectively. The diagnostic performance of primary tumor detection and NM staging was not influenced by the histologic subtype.

CONCLUSION

Adding (18)F-FDG PET/CT to CECT provides better diagnostic accuracy for detection of distant lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer.

Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT for surveillance in asymptomatic gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection

PURPOSE

The present study evaluated the diagnostic performance of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for surveillance in asymptomatic gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 190 gastric cancer patients (115 early gastric cancer patients and 75 advanced gastric cancer patients) who underwent 1-year (91 patients) or 2-year (99 patients) postoperative FDG PET/CT surveillance, along with a routine follow-up program, after curative surgical resection. All enrolled patients were asymptomatic and showed no recurrence on follow-up examinations performed before PET/CT surveillance. All PET/CT images were visually assessed and all abnormal findings on follow-up examinations including FDG PET/CT were confirmed with histopathological diagnosis or clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 19 patients (10.0 %) developed recurrence. FDG PET/CT showed abnormal findings in 37 patients (19.5 %). Among them, 16 patients (8.4 %) were diagnosed as cancer recurrence. Of 153 patients without abnormal findings on PET/CT, three patients were false-negative and diagnosed as recurrence on other follow-up examinations. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG PET/CT were 84.2 %, 87.7 %, 43.2 %, and 98.0 %, respectively. Among 115 early gastric cancer patients, PET/CT detected recurrence in four patients (3.5 %) and one patient with local recurrence. Among 75 advanced gastric cancer patients, PET/CT detected recurrence in 12 patients (16.0 %), excluding two patients experiencing peritoneal recurrence. In addition, FDG PET/CT detected secondary primary cancer in six (3.2 %) out of all the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative FDG PET/CT surveillance showed good diagnostic ability for detecting recurrence in gastric cancer patients. FDG PET/CT could be a useful follow-up modality for gastric cancer patients, especially those with advanced gastric cancer. However, further careful evaluation is needed because of false-positive findings on PET/CT.

Laparoscopy, computerised tomography and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers

BACKGROUND

The staging laparoscopy has been used in the management of gastrointestinal cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of staging laparoscopy, in comparison with computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging in staging patients with gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) and gastric cancers.

METHODS

The data were collected for patients between 1996 and 2013 undergoing investigation and treatment for GOJ and gastric cancers at a single institute. The pre-operative data (staging data), intraoperative details, post-operative course and follow-up were analysed for individual cases.

RESULTS

Staging laparoscopy altered management plan in 64 (17 %) of 387 patients with negative staging CT and FDG-PET scan. Twenty-seven (7 %) patients with GOJ cancer (types I, II and III) were identified with pathological intraperitoneal nodes, 15 (4 %) gastric cancer with metastatic intraperitoneal deposits and liver metastases and 3 % gastric cancers with positive ascitic fluid for cancer cells. Ten (3 %) of patients were downstaged and were offered curative resection. Patients with metastatic disease were referred for palliative chemotherapy. The overall sensitivity of staging laparoscopy in diagnosing intraabdominal pathology was 86 % in comparison with CT (81 %) and FDG-PET (78 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic laparoscopy is useful for detecting and confirming nodal involvement and distant metastatic disease not evident on the staging CT scan and FDG-PET. This could potentially alter treatment and prognosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer. The diagnostic laparoscopy should be performed as part of investigation and treatment planning for patients suffering from GOJ and gastric cancers. This can help to avoid surgery in patients with advanced disease.